User talk:Coaster92 - Knowledge (XXG)

1306:

service and therefore cannot provide a URL web link. That means you have to find it on your own. You can try some of the search tools listed below HOWEVER, what I have found to be much more useful is to contact my local library and get the password for their paid research service. There are some very powerful and comprehensive ones like Proquest and Lexis that will save you a lot of time. Most libraries will allow their local card holders to use the service for free. ALSO, you can sometimes acquire paid services for free through Knowledge (XXG) ie High Beam (news and magazines) (

1325: 185:. The third-party sources which might make the case for a standalone article are currently used in the Academy draft itself, while a complete list of winners would have to be sourced back to the Academy itself; many articles exist identifying individual winners (often in their obits) but there is no accounting for all winners besides the Academy's own website. Of course, the same appears to be true of list articles associated with the Oscars, for example 1776: 1736: 206: 85:

government documents that state her name as "von Drachenberg", so do countless secondary sources, major newspapers, books, her facebook account, IMDb, her interviews, etc, etc. Where does this claim that her name is "Drachenberg" only come from anyway... it just doesn't make any sense. Every other language wikipedia page names her "von Drachenberg". So just because there is one editor trying to prove his POV reason does not apply anymore?--

1558: 951: 1099:. I've replied there but also wanted to leave this note in case you aren't watching that page. I noticed you commented on the unsourced criticisms and maybe didn't see the other two requests above. If you have time now, would you be able to look at those and also the third statement from the "Criticisms" section? So far, there have not been any other replies to the requests (on the Talk page, at the 1257: 876:. Well, nothing was expected of you from me other than the clear-minded and objective view of things that you had already displayed. And I was simply thanking you for that and that I valued your input. Dennis Bratland called this 'canvassing' but you might be interested to know that other editors have since looked at my messsage to you and agree with me that it is not canvassing - see here 517: 617:'s name is misspelled on the list; I accidentally used the more common spelling of "Barbara", which is wrong in this case. Seems silly to ask you about it when it's so obviously non-controversial an edit, but better safe than sorry, I figure. Also, have you had a chance to consider the hatnote and orphan tag removal? Let me know when you have a moment. Best, 1628: 834:

Slight misunderstanding here: actually, I didn't mean 'talk' page mentions specifically about this case; I meant that on your talk page you had in the past clearly discussed ongoing edit disputes with editors who were involved in them, which is why I was surprised at your reaction to the idea of this

715:

However, since then I have started to receive advisories from the user Dennis Bratland regarding my supposed 'personal attacks' on him. It seems like a tactic to divert from the discussion of discredited evidence/sources. (And on the BMW R1100GS article 'talk' page, the codes WP:OWN and WP:SNOW where

300:

Hi Coaster, thanks for looking into this but it needs more that an impartial opinion. Page obviously is completely inconsistent with years of edit warring and pov pushing. Unfortunately there does not seem to be any way to force someone to discuss a change, nor do they have to explain themselves when

1203:

IMO the proposed paragraph could use more detail, including specific mention of the luxury apartment, jet and chauffeured limo (instead of "transportation") and why the package came under scrutiny, ie, presumably the need to allocate the perks in the divorce, possible SEC questions, and the issue of

1026:

Thank you for your latest post at the Buddy Fletcher thread. But I want to assure you: no worries. Not much is permanent here. Especially at BLPN. The text you cited at BLPN applies to the things in the first ten words of what you quoted. It doesn't apply to content. A useful content-related link is

270:

so I'm at odds as to why NI can not be mentioned in the location field. 3. The location field does allow for NI in the location field, contrary to BJmullans interpretation of the Infobox. NI does not need to be a country, for Northern Ireland to be a location. Its ridiculous. I do not see why NI can

1713:

Hmmm, not sure what to say. Certainly the spaces before the = sign were a problem, but the quotation marks also seemed to be an issue. It's possible that you drafted the text in Word, which used a special character for the curved quotation marks, and possibly WP markup didn't recognize that special

1479:

Hi, yes I did check the topic in the MSV article and that was my impression, that the focus in that article is on the buildings and land more than the activities of the participants (which is the discussion in the other article). It does not look like duplication to me. Please point me in the right

1219:

Hi again Coaster, I've made several changes to the section regarding Jack Welch's compensation taking into account the most recent feedback from you and Maximilianklein. This version better explains the compensation package and notes the criticism over "greed" that you mentioned. I would appreciate

1162:

Hi again, Hamilton83. I took a look at the reference for the current statement in the article concerning Welch's retirement compensation. The source is actually quoting the ex-wife's divorce papers, which are not a reliable secondary source. The source also states that Welch gave up the package and

1075:

At the moment the infobox links to the page for 2007-2009 winners, but I think it would make more sense to link to this new summary page. If this page was then so linked, does it seem reasonable to add the rest of the names from this page to the list? I've checked and there would be around 150 new

784:

However, in the spirit of hands-across-the-ocean, what is your view now on your own use of some, shall we say, 'strong' response language on the R1100GS 'talk' page (I think you know which I mean as I've mentioned them before). I ask because I've yet to read a response by you to the mention of it.

176:

Hi there, Coaster. As I said back on the Academy page, thanks for the help and I agree about the chronological listing. By the way, your second point raises a question I had in mind, perhaps you can offer some feedback. The Academy is interested in finding out whether a list article for winners of

1039:

in your view on mentioning a same-sex relationship in this context, but I've found it helpful to ask myself, "Is this something the subject would want to muzzle?" That's not carte blanche for the subject when the answer is "yes," but here, objectively, the answer is "no." The line of questioning

1267:

talk page. I hope you will be able to spend some time on the TM topic in the future. There are many related articles and a more sets of eyes from new editors are needed. I don't know how much time or interest you have but any help or input is appreciated. For example, recently a few editors made

84:

Thank you for your contribution. But why a birth certificate? That would mean that we would have to get a birth certificate on every bio on the wikipedia. In her autobiography her grandparents names are given as "von Drachenberg", her own name is given as "von Drachenberg"; there are official US

1695:

Hi Coaster. Thanks for your note. I love trouble-shooting things like this. Again, it was simply a matter of deleting extra spaces in the named refs and deleting the quotation marks around the ref names. (I have an intuition about what was causing the problem, and could probably explain it. But

1305:

Hi Coaster92, there are a number of search engine tools around that can help you find info on a topic and I've listed a bunch of FREE sources below. When a citation does not have a URL to support it, it often means that the editor who created the citation read the source via a PAID subscription

774:

it. Also, Coaster92 has proved to be an objective and non-connected editor who has commented on the noticeboard discussion of their own volition - so to complain about their involvement seems to suggest you think otherwise. I have no way of guaranteeing what they think on this and wanted them

382:

Bjmullan, whether a lough borders a sovereign state is irrelevant if it is inconsistent with the article content and not the most specific term to use. If you want to be more vague, you could say that the lough is in Western Europe. Your argument that Northern Ireland could not be used in the

856:

HI Dennis Bratland and Rivercard. I am happy to help out if I can but right now I am not sure what is requested of me. Rivercard, I did see on the DRN discussion that Dennis B is researching a different approach for the Ghost Rider section of the article, presumably an approach in which the

486:

earlier in the week, of course I do mean for only one to be used, though I wanted to present some different options. If you think the "chronological" is ready to post, would you be willing to move it to the mainspace? Relatedly, I've also got a couple of minor additional suggestions for the

238:

Could you possibly re-open this DR? As the discussion on the talk page is going no where with the DR results being ignored. Also the objecting parties seem to change their reasoning every time a valid rationale point for change is made. Also despite the ongoing discussion this edit was made

1185:

of Jack Welch's talk page? I made some adjustments to the proposed new text based on a reply from Maximilianklein, but since July 9 there have not been any further replies. I have asked him as well, but I would really like your input too. I hope to see you there again soon. Thanks,

1272:

article and commented that some parts of the article sounded promotional. If you see any specific areas that need to be edited for neutrality I would be very interested in that feedback (or you can just go ahead and adjust the text as needed). If you have any time to look at that

1454:

are article and look at the content there on monastic communities there? Do you feel its also more about people than architecture? I'm just trying to avoid duplication and to figure out where what is the proper place for this content. Any help or insights are appreciated. Thanks,

811:

It is not possible explain the WP:POINTy retaliation against Biker Biker's edits of the Corrado article without mentioning him by name. When anyone is mentioned by name on AIN, you are expected to notify them. If I were to guess, I'd say Biker Biker agrees with me about

1067:

article recently—particularly with the AfD. Now that the article is definitely going to stay, I've been thinking about possibly updating it with an expanded list of names. I wanted to get your opinion on whether it would be reasonable to expand the list based on this

419:

Thanks Coaster for your comments. I dare say that those will probably be ignored. For lack of a good argument, those who oppose seem to go silent, but then when you make an edit they come out of hiding again. Its ashame that this is what wiki is like, but thanks

769:

Well, I'm very surprised by your reaction because there's ample evidence on other talk pages of you discussing continuing entry edits with users such as Biker Biker, so it seems strange for you to disagree with it in principle as the evidence suggests you are

1163:

started funding most everything himself. So there needs to be an edit based on this alone. But I was not able to identify or connect to the source of your proposed statement. Let me know what the source is and how to connect and I will have a look at that.

664: 639:

Just saw your note: thanks for taking care of all those changes! Plus I've seen your reply on the Academy Talk page. I'll think about it over the weekend, and should have some thoughts for you Monday. Meantime, I hope you have a great weekend. Cheers,

1448:" It looks to me that the discussion of monastic communities in this article focuses on the activities of the people, rather than the buildings. Offhand, it does not seem the section is the best fit with the MSV article. Unless I am missing something" 726:

As you have already shown your objectivity and distance from these subjects, could I suggest your 'fresh perspective' input on this would be a great help. I wouldn't want to see the noticeboard discussion deleted because of false accusations. Thanks.

750:

takes a dim view of notifying the one editor from the the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard discussion that you think might be sympathetic, while pointedly not inviting the others whom you think might not be on your side. It's called votestacking.

977:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

999:

Coaster, thanks for the notice, and sorry about the trouble. I've actually got citations for additional coverage that I hadn't included (because they weren't online) which I'll take to the discussion page sometime today. Cheers,

775:

included as a way of introducing third-party balance. Finally, I cannot contact other editors who 'might not be onside' because there are none who have fundamentally disagreed with the case - so it would be difficult to do that.

389:

even though the edit was made without consensus, so please dont spew hypocrisy. My edit was made with support from HackneyHound and Mabuska and was consistent with text, infobox and map. Can you please answer these questions

981:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

1830:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 339:. These loughs are all in Northern Ireland, and all reference Northern Ireland in the Location field. Any argument that suggests that Northern Ireland can not be used in this field, is just pure POV pushing. 450:

Hi Coaster, the RFC seems to have hit a wall. The users who oppose the suggestion seem to be reasoning not relevant to the change. Can you advise what is the next step? How do you get around POV like this?

308:

BJmullan suggested that I wanted to remove the pipelink from the page, but no where on the Carlingford Talk Page did I suggest that. A complete fabrication, yet that was his objection. All your advice is

974: 357:

edit by Gravyring which was made without any consensus whatsoever. This editor talks about other's POV but all he seems to be interested in is pushing his own. I think you are on a hiding to nothing...

49:

once again; the discussion has progressed since you last weighed in, and I have proposed a possible compromise on the "EduCap" issue. Hope to see you there, at least once the strike is over. Cheers,

262:. If you can see a consensus here, then Ill ignore this. The same old argument that NI is not a country, hence NI can not have an international border blah blah blah, yet in the article this exists 1031:. On balance, I think content ought to be noteworthy in light of the subject and the subject's notability, but need not be tied to any central claim of notability. As long as the prose strikes the 279:

text to ROI-UK border page was also blocked yet pipe from point 1 exists. Its a contradiction. 5. The opposition argument is very weak. 6. Opposition argument and edit made without consensus

24:

Because you have participated in a related RfC on this article, or have recently contributed to it, you are hereby informed that your input would be highly appreciated on the new RfC here:

161:

regarding an arguably missing name from the list of student delegates, with a {{Request edit}} template, but I haven't received any response. Would you mind taking a look at it? Cheers,

534:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

1782: 1775: 1742: 1735: 1122:

Hi Hamilton83. I went to the article and talk page to check it out and it looks like everything has been done as you have requested by Canoe1967. So I think you are set for now.

535: 1044:

at any rate. I do not intend to browbeat with this post. You've been big. Again, thank you. And I apologize for my tone generally. I hope you'll keep contributing at BLPN.

383:

location field was false as I've shown a number of pages using the same template and using 'Northern Ireland' as the location. This edit was made by One Night in Hackney

789:

that often attempts to humanise these exchanges rather than have them degenerate it cold factionalism. In other words, I'm all for doing the best for the article entry.)

259:

My Concerns are that the page has been riddled with POV that the article is not very coherent or consistent. 1. The term 'International' was removed with out consensus

263: 1513: 117: 491:

article I'm going to post over there in a moment. If you want to review those, feel free, though I'm going to put a {{Request edit}} tag on it as well. Cheers,

1509: 113: 1355: 1523: 963: 902:

Anyway, hopefully, Dennis won't seek out this brief communication I've made with you and use it to accuse me of some other kind of violation! With regards,

127: 568:

Hi again, Coaster. Since you asked for a ping, I'm all too happy to supply one—two, actually. I've just posted a pair of responses, first on the

820:, and doesn't give a hoot about personal attacks enough to weigh in on AIN. So it's neither here nor there and notifying him was a formality. -- 897:

motorbike's that Peart could have used instead of this one. Which rather destroys the notion that the book is inextricable linked to the bike.

857:

connection of this section to the topic would be readily apparent. That could be worth a try. Please let me know what you would like me to do.

1519: 123: 1855: 1789: 1749: 1264: 223: 1269: 64:

Just posted a follow-up comment on the Academy Talk page; I look forward to continuing the discussion when you have the chance. Cheers,

506: 678:

Thanks for all of your assistance with the Academy of Achievement and Golden Plate articles! You've been extraordinarily helpful.

1851: 177:

the Golden Plate award would be plausible. In my investigation of existing articles and guidelines, I've found myself weighing

1516:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 120:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1696:

likely it's not worth the time.) When you name a ref, simply don't use spaces or quotation marks: <ref name=NYTimes: -->

1064: 958: 942: 610: 1104: 524: 353:

The difference with these articles are the loughs do not border a sovereign state. Coaster92 you might be interested in

1842:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

967: 186: 1847: 1107:

page) and I'd be very grateful for your help. I'll also try at the Help desk, in case someone there can help. Thanks,

569: 158: 46: 1698:. In many of the refs you had put a space before the = sign. Great work on the article. You've really improved it! 1500:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

306: 1236:

Maximiliankleinoclc added the latest version of your paragraph to the criticism section. Is this what you wanted?

825: 756: 31: 922:

I'm not exactly sure which editors who have been involved in the original discussions I should notify of this -

1800: 1760: 1714:

character. When I type quotation marks in WP markup, they're straight rather than curved. That's just a guess.

923: 877: 720: 1451: 576:

about the Golden Plate list, with a small request. Meantime, thanks so much for your help with both. Cheers,

1220:

it if you had time to review the changes I've made and make the edit if you agree with the wording. Thanks,

747: 743: 178: 1501: 105: 1843: 1681: 1652: 1599: 712:(or others) to show that the section on Neil Peart's book should remain on the motorbike article page. 1614:

Thanks WhiteWriter. That is an interesting topic. It seems so long ago I worked on that. Best wishes.

1604: 1572: 893:

noticeboard discussion, and there is ample evidence - even on Knowledge (XXG) itself - that there are

1225: 1191: 1149: 1112: 821: 752: 709: 27: 1819: 1810: 1646: 1637: 478:

Hi there, Coaster. I hope I'm not a bother, but I'm writing to check in with you about the proposed

1796: 1756: 1410: 1274: 1144:, which I've posted on the Jack Welch discussion page, in case you're able to consider it. Thanks, 931: 907: 890: 840: 802: 733: 705: 554: 455: 425: 398: 344: 314: 290: 250: 1839: 1823: 1032: 545:

You are welcome to edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

1719: 1703: 1466: 1428: 1288: 363: 90: 1100: 1041: 817: 182: 1641:, a WikiProject and resource for Knowledge (XXG) cleanup listings, information and discussion. 1539: 1081: 1069: 1005: 683: 645: 622: 596: 581: 573: 496: 483: 212: 205: 194: 166: 143: 69: 54: 1835: 1827: 1016: 1697:. On subsequent references, also omit spaces and quotation marks: <ref name=NYTimes/: --> 614: 528: 510: 45:

Hello, Coaster. I'd like to see if I could get you to look at the current discussion on the

1838:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1831: 1557: 1036: 1028: 546: 539: 1221: 1187: 1182: 1145: 1141: 1108: 1096: 1049: 1680:

Thanks for signing on, and please feel free to post entries there for clean-up! Cheers,

1666: 1585: 1481: 1307: 1237: 1205: 1164: 1123: 1035:

in terms of textual import, no content in particular is limited. I don't question your

1020: 927: 903: 858: 836: 798: 746:

explains what a topic ban actually is. I would think you wouldn't let it come to that.

729: 550: 549:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. --

451: 421: 394: 340: 310: 286: 246: 889:. You might be interested to know I've posted a rebuttal of this idea on the original 1715: 1699: 1530:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1458: 1420: 1280: 1181:

Hi again, Coaster. If you have the opportunity, would you be willing to revisit the

989: 359: 134:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

86: 1535: 1531: 1077: 1001: 679: 641: 618: 592: 577: 492: 190: 162: 139: 135: 109: 65: 50: 1311: 1256: 663: 516: 1707: 1315: 1045: 1505: 18: 1450:

This is a good point..... but as an alternative can you take a look at the

260: 1385: 327:

Some examples of other pages using the same template as Carlingford Lough

1570:

For a great copy-edit of a awful subject. Thank you for your fine work.

984: 1859: 1826:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

1804: 1764: 1723: 1684: 1674: 1656: 1627: 1608: 1593: 1576: 1543: 1489: 1473: 1435: 1400: 1295: 1245: 1229: 1213: 1195: 1172: 1153: 1131: 1116: 1085: 1053: 1009: 993: 935: 926:- but rather than mistakenly leave out, I'll instead include. Regards, 911: 866: 844: 829: 806: 760: 737: 723:- which is an attempt by user Dennis Bratland to ban the whole topic! 687: 649: 626: 600: 585: 558: 500: 459: 429: 402: 367: 348: 318: 294: 254: 219: 198: 170: 147: 94: 73: 58: 35: 1375: 1335: 328: 1395: 975:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of Golden Plate awardees

1140:

Thanks for going over and taking a look at things. I actually have

523:

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have on for

301:

they make a revert. The objections so far have been like comparing

1255: 1365: 1076:

names to add to the article. Let me know what you think. Cheers,

1665:

Thanks for the invite, Northamerica. I went ahead and joined up.

1405: 1390: 708:. Since your contribution no new evidence has been presented by 1350: 1345: 1277:

and/or the article that would be very helpful. Thanks again.--

887:'researching a different approach for the Ghost Rider section' 1621: 189:. Any feedback you might have would be very welcome. Cheers, 157:

Hi there, Coaster. Last week I put up a small request on the

1792:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1774: 1752:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1734: 1626: 1370: 1340: 1204:

greed. I left this comment on the article talk page as well.

515: 337: 226:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

204: 1360: 1330: 1263:

Thanks for being a participant at RSN and for visiting the

835:

editor's involvement. That's all it was, nothing sinister.

1063:

Hi Coaster, I really appreciated your assistance with the

962:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

334: 331: 1783:

Knowledge (XXG):Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard

1743:

Knowledge (XXG):Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard

285:

There are users who are clearly pushing some sort of POV.

1504:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 956:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

391: 387: 384: 354: 280: 243: 240: 108:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1380: 1072:, which summarizes winners of the award by category. 536:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Plummer v. State

242:

by User:One Night In Hackney based on this reasoning

1650:

the project, just add your name to the member list.

268:

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

878:- Request to delete personal attacks else topic ban 591:And just replied on my Talk page re: the hatnote. 1818:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 721:Request to delete personal attacks else topic ban 1788:Message added 10:28, 30 May 2013 (UTC). You can 1748:Message added 11:45, 29 May 2013 (UTC). You can 1496:Disambiguation link notification for February 10 1318:) but they are not as powerful as Proquest etc. 1070:new page on the Academy of Achievement website 41:Proposed compromise for Academy of Achievement 8: 1781:Hello, Coaster92. You have new messages at 1741:Hello, Coaster92. You have new messages at 1691:Nice job on article about David Lynch's book 211:Hello, Coaster92. You have new messages at 1602:. You may check talk page.. :) All best! -- 964:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 661: 609:I just noticed an error of my own on the 716:thrown about without any justification) 572:about the Foundation's support, and on 266:. 2. United Kingdom or UK is short for 1097:my requests for the Jack Welch article 271:not be used in the location field as 245:which is a very inflammatory action. 7: 1480:direction if I overlooked something. 1265:History of Transcendental Meditation 704:Hi, thanks for your contribution to 1270:Transcendental Meditation technique 14: 1844:review the candidates' statements 973:The article will be discussed at 187:List of Best Actor winners by age 1556: 1040:ends. Plus, there's no apparent 949: 662: 159:Academy of Achievement Talk page 100:Disambiguation link notification 47:Academy of Achievement Talk page 1314:), Credo (encyclopedias etc.) ( 1850:. For the Election committee, 1820:Arbitration Committee election 1811:ArbCom elections are now open! 816:, but disagrees with me about 1: 1860:16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 1657:15:40, 24 February 2013 (UTC) 1609:19:15, 20 February 2013 (UTC) 1594:23:20, 16 February 2013 (UTC) 1577:16:49, 15 February 2013 (UTC) 1544:11:28, 10 February 2013 (UTC) 1065:List of Golden Plate awardees 959:List of Golden Plate awardees 943:List of Golden Plate awardees 480:List of Golden Plate awardees 199:22:11, 28 February 2012 (UTC) 171:13:09, 28 February 2012 (UTC) 104:Hi. When you recently edited 1490:07:08, 5 December 2012 (UTC) 1474:19:52, 2 December 2012 (UTC) 1436:17:21, 27 October 2012 (UTC) 1310:), Questia (academic books)( 386:and you supported this edit 148:10:36, 31 January 2012 (UTC) 95:23:31, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 74:18:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC) 59:23:17, 17 January 2012 (UTC) 36:17:01, 9 November 2011 (UTC) 1846:and submit your choices on 1446:HI, regarding your comment: 1336:Google News Timeline Search 1326:Google News Search Archives 1095:Thanks for your comment on 527:. The nominated article is 275:. 4. MY suggestion to pipe 1875: 1852:MediaWiki message delivery 1724:20:53, 31 March 2013 (UTC) 1708:14:52, 31 March 2013 (UTC) 1296:02:47, 8 August 2012 (UTC) 1059:Golden Plate awardees list 1010:11:33, 11 April 2012 (UTC) 994:23:53, 10 April 2012 (UTC) 936:13:06, 10 April 2012 (UTC) 748:Knowledge (XXG):Canvassing 744:Knowledge (XXG):Topic bans 688:18:55, 26 March 2012 (UTC) 650:21:34, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 627:13:25, 22 March 2012 (UTC) 601:18:36, 20 March 2012 (UTC) 586:19:43, 19 March 2012 (UTC) 559:19:43, 17 March 2012 (UTC) 460:22:06, 12 March 2012 (UTC) 1685:01:38, 7 March 2013 (UTC) 1675:06:49, 1 March 2013 (UTC) 1564:The Copyeditor's Barnstar 1555: 1351:Google Book Citation Tool 1246:04:11, 31 July 2012 (UTC) 1230:20:09, 30 July 2012 (UTC) 1214:05:19, 17 July 2012 (UTC) 1196:13:10, 16 July 2012 (UTC) 1132:06:00, 28 June 2012 (UTC) 1117:16:07, 27 June 2012 (UTC) 1042:libelous untrue statement 924:Bad Faith and Mr Bratland 912:11:56, 6 April 2012 (UTC) 867:05:08, 6 April 2012 (UTC) 845:23:20, 5 April 2012 (UTC) 830:22:42, 5 April 2012 (UTC) 807:22:32, 5 April 2012 (UTC) 761:20:08, 5 April 2012 (UTC) 738:18:52, 5 April 2012 (UTC) 668: 611:Golden Plate list article 542:with four tildes (~~~~). 501:17:28, 9 March 2012 (UTC) 430:22:02, 6 March 2012 (UTC) 403:22:59, 5 March 2012 (UTC) 368:22:32, 5 March 2012 (UTC) 349:22:09, 5 March 2012 (UTC) 319:21:47, 5 March 2012 (UTC) 295:10:41, 3 March 2012 (UTC) 255:22:18, 1 March 2012 (UTC) 220:17:23, 6 March 2012 (UTC) 1805:10:28, 30 May 2013 (UTC) 1765:11:45, 29 May 2013 (UTC) 1670: 1635:You are invited to join 1589: 1485: 1452:Maharishi Sthapatya Veda 1411:Rolling Stone mag search 1401:US State Archives search 1241: 1209: 1173:05:13, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 1168: 1154:18:41, 2 July 2012 (UTC) 1127: 1086:18:06, 25 May 2012 (UTC) 966:or whether it should be 862: 482:drafts. As I replied on 1396:Web Page Archive search 1268:one-time visits to the 1183:Compensation discussion 1054:03:43, 2 May 2012 (UTC) 1779: 1739: 1631: 1502:David Lynch Foundation 1260: 885:Re: Dennis Bratland's 785:(And, remember, it is 706:BMW R1100GS discussion 700:Noticeboard discussion 520: 489:Academy of Achievement 474:Golden Plate follow-up 209: 106:Academy of Achievement 1824:Arbitration Committee 1778: 1738: 1630: 1600:Organ theft in Kosovo 1346:Google Scholar Search 1259: 891:BMW R1100GS (Reopend) 672:The Original Barnstar 547:articles for deletion 519: 208: 1690: 1532:opt-out instructions 538:. Please be sure to 231:DR Carlingford Lough 136:opt-out instructions 1828:arbitration process 1638:WikiProject Cleanup 1618:WikiProject Cleanup 1549:A barnstar for you! 1514:fix with Dab solver 1356:Google Ngram Viewer 1341:Google Books Search 213:WWB Too's talk page 118:fix with Dab solver 1840:arbitration policy 1790:remove this notice 1780: 1750:remove this notice 1740: 1633:Hello, Coaster92. 1632: 1522:• Join us at the 1331:Google News Search 1261: 540:sign your comments 521: 224:remove this notice 210: 126:• Join us at the 1663: 1662: 1582: 1581: 1527: 719:Also, now this - 693: 692: 570:Academy Talk page 303:apples with pears 131: 1866: 1793: 1753: 1682:Northamerica1000 1655: 1653:Northamerica1000 1622: 1607: 1575: 1560: 1553: 1552: 1517: 1510:check to confirm 1472: 1469: 1434: 1431: 1366:The Free Library 1294: 1291: 1142:one more request 1105:Paid Editor Help 953: 952: 918:Hi - A follow up 666: 659: 658: 615:Barbra Streisand 529:Plummer v. State 511:Plummer v. State 227: 153:Academy question 121: 114:check to confirm 1874: 1873: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1848:the voting page 1814: 1794: 1787: 1772: 1754: 1747: 1732: 1693: 1659: 1651: 1620: 1603: 1571: 1551: 1524:DPL WikiProject 1498: 1467: 1456: 1444: 1429: 1418: 1406:TV News Archive 1371:Magazine Search 1322:Research Tools 1303: 1289: 1278: 1254: 1101:BLP noticeboard 1093: 1061: 1024: 954: 950: 947: 920: 822:Dennis Bratland 753:Dennis Bratland 710:Dennis Bratland 702: 566: 514: 476: 233: 228: 217: 155: 128:DPL WikiProject 102: 82: 43: 28:Dominus Vobisdu 22: 12: 11: 5: 1872: 1870: 1817: 1813: 1808: 1797:OrangesRyellow 1786: 1773: 1771: 1768: 1757:OrangesRyellow 1746: 1733: 1731: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1692: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1661: 1660: 1642: 1625: 1619: 1616: 1612: 1611: 1584:What edit, WW? 1580: 1579: 1567: 1566: 1561: 1550: 1547: 1497: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1443: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1408: 1403: 1398: 1393: 1388: 1383: 1378: 1376:Pub Med Search 1373: 1368: 1363: 1358: 1353: 1348: 1343: 1338: 1333: 1328: 1302: 1301:Research tools 1299: 1253: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1233: 1232: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1176: 1175: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1135: 1134: 1092: 1089: 1060: 1057: 1023: 1021:Buddy Fletcher 1014: 1013: 1012: 948: 946: 941:Nomination of 939: 919: 916: 915: 914: 899: 898: 882: 881: 854: 853: 852: 851: 850: 849: 848: 847: 793: 792: 791: 790: 779: 778: 777: 776: 764: 763: 728: 701: 698: 696: 695: 691: 690: 675: 674: 669: 667: 657: 656: 655: 654: 653: 652: 632: 631: 630: 629: 604: 603: 565: 562: 513: 509:nomination of 504: 475: 472: 471: 470: 469: 468: 467: 466: 465: 464: 463: 462: 439: 438: 437: 436: 435: 434: 433: 432: 410: 409: 408: 407: 406: 405: 375: 374: 373: 372: 371: 370: 322: 321: 235:Hi Coaster92, 232: 229: 218:Message added 216: 203: 202: 201: 154: 151: 101: 98: 81: 78: 77: 76: 42: 39: 26:]. Thank you! 21: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1871: 1862: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1821: 1812: 1809: 1807: 1806: 1802: 1798: 1791: 1784: 1777: 1769: 1767: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1751: 1744: 1737: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1717: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1686: 1683: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1658: 1654: 1649: 1648: 1643: 1640: 1639: 1629: 1624: 1623: 1617: 1615: 1610: 1606: 1601: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1578: 1574: 1569: 1568: 1565: 1562: 1559: 1554: 1548: 1546: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1528: 1525: 1521: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1470: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1453: 1449: 1441: 1437: 1432: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1416: 1412: 1409: 1407: 1404: 1402: 1399: 1397: 1394: 1392: 1389: 1387: 1384: 1382: 1379: 1377: 1374: 1372: 1369: 1367: 1364: 1362: 1359: 1357: 1354: 1352: 1349: 1347: 1344: 1342: 1339: 1337: 1334: 1332: 1329: 1327: 1324: 1323: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1317: 1313: 1309: 1300: 1298: 1297: 1292: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1276: 1271: 1266: 1258: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1234: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1184: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1161: 1160: 1155: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1090: 1088: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1073: 1071: 1066: 1058: 1056: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1022: 1018: 1015: 1011: 1007: 1003: 998: 997: 996: 995: 991: 987: 986: 979: 976: 971: 969: 965: 961: 960: 944: 940: 938: 937: 933: 929: 925: 917: 913: 909: 905: 901: 900: 896: 892: 888: 884: 883: 879: 875: 871: 870: 869: 868: 864: 860: 846: 842: 838: 833: 832: 831: 827: 823: 819: 815: 810: 809: 808: 804: 800: 797: 796: 795: 794: 788: 783: 782: 781: 780: 773: 768: 767: 766: 765: 762: 758: 754: 749: 745: 742: 741: 740: 739: 735: 731: 724: 722: 717: 713: 711: 707: 699: 697: 689: 685: 681: 677: 676: 673: 670: 665: 660: 651: 647: 643: 638: 637: 636: 635: 634: 633: 628: 624: 620: 616: 612: 608: 607: 606: 605: 602: 598: 594: 590: 589: 588: 587: 583: 579: 575: 571: 563: 561: 560: 556: 552: 548: 543: 541: 537: 532: 530: 526: 518: 512: 508: 505: 503: 502: 498: 494: 490: 485: 481: 473: 461: 457: 453: 449: 448: 447: 446: 445: 444: 443: 442: 441: 440: 431: 427: 423: 418: 417: 416: 415: 414: 413: 412: 411: 404: 400: 396: 392: 388: 385: 381: 380: 379: 378: 377: 376: 369: 365: 361: 356: 352: 351: 350: 346: 342: 338: 335: 332: 329: 326: 325: 324: 323: 320: 316: 312: 307: 304: 299: 298: 297: 296: 292: 288: 283: 281: 278: 277:NI-ROI border 274: 273:NI-ROI border 269: 265: 261: 257: 256: 252: 248: 244: 241: 236: 230: 225: 221: 214: 207: 200: 196: 192: 188: 184: 180: 179:WP:NOTCATALOG 175: 174: 173: 172: 168: 164: 160: 152: 150: 149: 145: 141: 137: 132: 129: 125: 119: 115: 111: 107: 99: 97: 96: 92: 88: 79: 75: 71: 67: 63: 62: 61: 60: 56: 52: 48: 40: 38: 37: 33: 29: 25: 20: 16: 1815: 1795: 1755: 1694: 1664: 1645: 1636: 1634: 1613: 1583: 1563: 1529: 1499: 1460: 1459: 1447: 1445: 1422: 1421: 1386:Legal Search 1304: 1282: 1281: 1262: 1202: 1094: 1074: 1062: 1033:best balance 1025: 983: 980: 972: 957: 955: 945:for deletion 921: 894: 886: 873: 855: 813: 786: 771: 725: 718: 714: 703: 694: 671: 574:my Talk page 567: 544: 533: 522: 488: 484:my Talk page 479: 477: 302: 284: 276: 272: 267: 258: 237: 234: 156: 133: 110:Charles Mayo 103: 83: 44: 23: 1605:WhiteWriter 1573:WhiteWriter 1391:Wiki Search 1103:or at the 814:Ghost Rider 564:WWB replies 1836:topic bans 1534:. Thanks, 1381:PDF Search 1316:apply here 1312:apply here 1308:apply here 1222:Hamilton83 1188:Hamilton83 1146:Hamilton83 1109:Hamilton83 1091:Jack Welch 1037:good faith 1019:thread on 264:the border 222:. You can 138:. Thanks, 1832:site bans 1667:Coaster92 1586:Coaster92 1518:Read the 1506:Paul Horn 1482:Coaster92 1361:World Cat 1275:talk page 1238:Coaster92 1206:Coaster92 1165:Coaster92 1124:Coaster92 928:Rivercard 904:Rivercard 874:Coaster92 859:Coaster92 837:Rivercard 799:Rivercard 730:Rivercard 551:Guy Macon 452:Gravyring 422:Gravyring 395:Gravyring 341:Gravyring 311:Gravyring 305:. In the 287:Gravyring 247:Gravyring 122:Read the 80:Kat von D 19:Astrology 1770:Talkback 1730:Talkback 1716:TimidGuy 1700:TimidGuy 1461:Keithbob 1442:Question 1423:Keithbob 1283:Keithbob 818:WP:WPACT 525:deletion 360:Bjmullan 309:welcome. 183:WP:NLIST 181:against 87:IIIraute 1536:DPL bot 1078:WWB Too 1002:WWB Too 968:deleted 680:WWB Too 642:WWB Too 619:WWB Too 593:WWB Too 578:WWB Too 493:WWB Too 191:WWB Too 163:WWB Too 140:DPL bot 66:WWB Too 51:WWB Too 17:RfC on 1822:. The 1252:Thanks 1029:WP:NNC 420:again. 1046:JFHJr 990:talk 895:other 1856:talk 1801:talk 1761:talk 1720:talk 1704:talk 1671:talk 1647:join 1590:talk 1540:talk 1486:talk 1468:Talk 1430:Talk 1290:Talk 1242:talk 1226:talk 1210:talk 1192:talk 1169:talk 1150:talk 1128:talk 1113:talk 1082:talk 1017:BLPN 1006:talk 932:talk 908:talk 863:talk 841:talk 826:talk 803:talk 757:talk 734:talk 684:talk 646:talk 623:talk 597:talk 582:talk 555:talk 497:talk 456:talk 426:talk 399:talk 364:talk 355:this 345:talk 315:talk 291:talk 251:talk 195:talk 167:talk 144:talk 91:talk 70:talk 55:talk 32:talk 1816:Hi, 1644:To 1520:FAQ 1027:at 985:DGG 872:Hi 772:for 531:. 507:AfD 124:FAQ 1858:) 1834:, 1803:) 1763:) 1722:) 1706:) 1673:) 1592:) 1542:) 1512:| 1488:) 1471:• 1465:• 1457:— 1455:-- 1433:• 1427:• 1419:— 1417:-- 1293:• 1287:• 1279:— 1244:) 1228:) 1212:) 1194:) 1171:) 1152:) 1130:) 1115:) 1084:) 1052:) 1008:) 992:) 970:. 934:) 910:) 865:) 843:) 828:) 805:) 787:me 759:) 751:-- 736:) 686:) 648:) 625:) 613:: 599:) 584:) 557:) 499:) 458:) 428:) 401:) 393:? 366:) 347:) 336:, 333:, 330:, 317:) 293:) 282:. 253:) 197:) 169:) 146:) 116:| 93:) 72:) 57:) 34:) 1854:( 1799:( 1785:. 1759:( 1745:. 1718:( 1702:( 1669:( 1588:( 1538:( 1526:. 1508:( 1484:( 1240:( 1224:( 1208:( 1190:( 1167:( 1148:( 1126:( 1111:( 1080:( 1050:㊟ 1048:( 1004:( 988:( 930:( 906:( 880:. 861:( 839:( 824:( 801:( 755:( 732:( 682:( 644:( 621:( 595:( 580:( 553:( 495:( 454:( 424:( 397:( 362:( 343:( 313:( 289:( 249:( 215:. 193:( 165:( 142:( 130:. 112:( 89:( 68:( 53:( 30:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index