Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Clossius

Source 📝

429:
you quit, you may retain legally the title Professor. This was debatable with the "Hessenprofessoren" of the 1970s, C2 and so on, but by now it is absolutely clear that this is so. The German law and usage are very clear here; we have respective laws, court decisions of the respective courts, approvals by the ministries, and of course comments in the respective Wissenschaftsrechts-commentaries, handbooks, the recommendations etc. by Wissenschaftsrat, KMK and the like. Look at the entry you changed - I do not say that Professor is a title, indeed it hardly is in Germany, but that it also has a title function that is separate from the position. Yes, it is not legally a title like the Dr., in that it does not get into your ID cards etc., but it is a title in the sense that you retain it legally (and there are severe penalties if you use titles you are not en-itled to in Germany) even if you quit. As regards the German article,
481:- I think the ANC is the most "real" church in Tallinn by now (at least in the Toompea/Vanalinn area), because it is actually used as a church; it is welcoming to foreigners, and people of all classes and generations go there to pray and worship. I think that is what matters. I do, in principle, like Russian Orthodox (and Greek Orthodox) churches, though not the ones you mentioned (I like extravagant architecture, but not necessarily colorful). But that is really a non-wiki matter of taste; I think ANC was indeed intended as "show architecture". Even that "works" sometimes, but in this case, what is fascinating to me is that was primarily meant as a political symbol has turned into a real church. 290:"postmodernism-conservative". :-) But I must say - and that has to do with my own view of Knowledge (XXG) - that that I see no reason on earth why he should be deleted; he's certainly more important than your arverage college professor (just 12 hits on Google Scholar, but many more on Google itself), and the presses and substance matter of his pieces are solid enough. Of course, the article is a stub and is missing especially the key contributions and merits of Spanos, but this is not a "vanity piece" (and if it were, I wouldn't care either; I think vanity is fine for those who have at least a bit of a reason to be vain :-)). 521:, and Mr. Reinert found my name and contacted me about some vandalism on his bio. The bio was written by one of his students, and he is reluctant to edit an article about himself. I noticed that you've reverted vandalism in the article before, so I thought I'd let you know what's going on. Someone is trying to bring personal issues into this article. Reinert has documentation to support his claim that falsehoods have been inserted, which he'll be sending to me later today. I'll keep it on my watchlist, but since you've already looked after it I also hope that you'll continute to keep an eye out for any trouble. 437:. I should say that this is not a personal issue for me (I can tell you outside of wiki why not), and I find this even odd and regrettable - once you quit being a Professor, you should not retain the title, i.m.h.o., but my opinion is not what matters - nor is yours. I'll revert the article again; if you have a problem with that, we can either do arbitration right away, or we can start citing the respective literature (not the German wiki, please), which admittedly would be a bit tedious (and not readily understandable for the readership here), but if it has to be... 354:. I just noticed that there were two articles for this person, and they needed to be merged, with a redirect from one to the other. If you feel the article belongs under "Adolph", you are quite free to move it and you have the power to do so. To help you do this, I have deleted the redirect, and all you need to do is to move the article from Adolf Wagner to Adolph Wagner. You can then create a new article on the other Adolf Wagner to avoid future confusion. 246:
legal discipline, and the field of economics as well", whereas "Law and Economics", or even better "Law & Economics" (which I prefer also), signalizes that this is a specific scholarly method or, better, approach (economic analysis of the law, broadly understood). But I don't care for the issue strongly enough to get into the issue of the (highly problematic) L&E article, so I won't revert anything again and just let it go.
1417: 1461: 1074: 694:
I am not sure I know of any serious historian of science today who judges the historical contribution of scholars according to the standards of today, i.e. of what today is believed to be correct. It's hardly a matter of feeling to say that in its time, White's was indeed decent history - nor that it
419:
This makes it absolutely clear that in the vast majority of german Professors the term "Professor" is not a title but a work position. This is also reflected in the fact that unlike the title 'Dr.' (Ph.D.) the term 'Professor' can NOT be added to the name for example in the passport or identity card.
195:
that name!) would require the same effort as a full scholarly paper (and I just finished one on Xenophanes and am a bit exhausted). What is true is that this is a Classics discussion that can only orient itself towards the Greek text, not any translation, not even by Jowett (a great man indeed, but
88:
20:40, 18 Mar 2004 (UTC) But because I didn't want to mess up 'Did You Know' with a small detail, which, after all is designed to entice new people into Knowledge (XXG), I reasoned that a curious person could just click on Einasto, as you did. So my scheme worked. And Einasto would be happy to share
684:. I am not sure what you see as the problem, so you are going to have to explain it more if you want me to address it. You seem to have the feeling that there must be some historians who would regard White's book as decent history, if a little dated. What would it take to assure you that it is not? 589:
The usual biographical literature of course - the standard German, Russaian, and Estonian histories of the University of Tartu, the essay on his Chair (which has a good biosketch with the data and evaluation of his work), and there is a big recent biography by an Estonian scholar with a summary in
428:
The German wikipedia, where I am also active, is plainly wrong there, but I did not have the time to improve it there. It may well be that you think you are right, but factually you are not. It is by now so that even if you are Ordinarius or Extraordinarius (C4 or C3, by now mostly W3 or W2) and
83:
I was reacting to the 'Did you know' notation which incorrectly attributed the discovery of dark matter only to Einasto, when Vera Rubin did the work decades ago in the midst of great incredulity. It is just to share credit with Einasto, but it is incorrect for the 'Did you know' notation to grant
301:
Thank you for your comments. I too wouldn't have minded if Prof. Spanos had written this article by himself, even with slight vanity it would probably have been more insightful than what we currently have. Can't fault the person who nominated this for deletion though, the first version was almost
127:
Because there is a Discussion Page attached to the Reichsdeutsche page, and I read somewhere that it is "bad form" to delete or move or redirect pages with discussion, and I am certainly nobody who would try to "take along" the discussion. Hence I thought that this way of indirect referral would
381:
which you reverted. Sorry, but your opionion is just plainely wrong. I'm affiliated with a german university (however not as a professor) and the title Professor is not a life long title but related to the work position. This is also explained in the corresponding article in the german wikipedia
245:
The issue is a bit debated even within the scholarly community dealing with the issue. The problem, I think, is that for many, the capitalization/decapitalization issue is somehow ideological, and so there is a problem here. Usually, L&E experts are wary that "law and economics" means "the
408:
Even more: "Der Unterschied besteht vor allem darin, dass der Titel erhalten bleibt, auch wenn der Beruf nicht mehr ausgeübt wird (man kann ihn aber aberkennen oder niederlegen), während die Berufs- oder Dienstbezeichnung bei Aufgabe der Tätigkeit nicht mehr weiter besteht (eine Ausnahme bildet
144:
Seems to be done now, but at least not by myself. :-) You know, one of the most interesting experiences on wiki for me is that because of the group dynamics, one has to be much more careful with what one says or does than one has to be when writing scholarly articles for journals or "classic"
814:
status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually
897:
The copyright status is completely clear; it is not necessary to change anything there. This is the case regarding US law as well as the German one. If someone really feels she or he would enjoy additional information, I would however supply it before getting into some no-win fight.
414:
The main difference is that the title will still remain after the job is no longer fullfilled (it is however possible to return it or have it rejected), while the work title will not remain any longer after the end of the job entitlement (with an exception beeing the retirement or
289:
Hi jni, I'm afraid that I have to reply with the weasel answer that "the name rings a bell" but that I could not have placed the name, and that I'm not familiar with any of his work from my own dealings with the Heidegger, Arendt etc. discourse. From his website, he seems to be a
476:
Well, I do not like the Romanov revival style of the turn-of-the century in general (with exceptions), and I don't think the ANC is particularly beautiful as such - it can be in a certain light, from certain perspectives, etc. But my point in this discussion was not disparaging,
733: 1301:
Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).
1228:
Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).
785:
Thank you for the invitation. This looks like a very cool prpject - exactly the direction Knowledge (XXG) ought to be going -, and I've signed up and will be happy to see how the project is going (and will contribute to that myself of course :-)).
650:
Hello, I've been impressed with your edits and was curious about your "real-world" publications. Can you direct me to some? I understand if you would rather remain anonymous, but on the other hand I would be interested in reading your work.
754:
I won't say too much, as I'd like you to judge it for yourself, but you should find that it is different from Knowledge (XXG), because approximately 90% of our contributors so far are psychologists, academics, or students and trainees.
237:? There are many articles linking to it in its current case. I'm not an expert in this area; if you think this would be more appropriate capitalisation, I suggest you move the page and revert my change to Wilhelm Lexis again.-- 190:
Wow, what a discussion there! I'm not a classicist, but I deal with Greek Philosophy (and political philosophy) quite a bit. The problem is, to get into this Republic discussion (this is what happens if one gives the
531:
Doing what I can, but I really hope this will stop some time soon. This guy and his sockpuppets are really slanderous and libelous, and it's well beyond what should happen on wikipedia. Just saw it has happened again.
389:
I will cite: "Professor (von lat. profiteri, 'öffentlich bekennen, vortragen') ist die Berufsbezeichnung (bzw. Dienstbezeichnung) eines in der Regel beamteten Lehrers an einer Hochschule (auch: Hochschullehrer)."
1161: 1373:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 277:, is he a notable enough scholar to have an article about him in Knowledge (XXG)? He has published few papers about Heidegger, Arendt, Derrida, etc. so I venture a guess you might have heard of him. Please see 89:
the credit with a giant, which Vera Rubin indeed is. It is again unjust that such a quiet scientist like Rubin would be ignored, in this age of women's rights. Notice again the inadequate article on Zwicky.
261:
I will be putting ol' Max on Featured candidate soon, after 2 peer reviews I think he is ready for big time. Since you have helped before, I'd appreciate any last checks you could give the article. --
1011:
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
969:
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
92:
Her work on galactic rotation was not attributed either in that article or in the dark matter article, so where do we start ... I chose to start with a glaring injustice in Did You Know.
922: 1050: 1481:
to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.
1433: 695:
was and (actually to my own surprise) is a book that is actually read. I think that's also reflected in the contemporary literature both on White and on the history of science.
320:
We could use some Wikimania help, particularly with coordinating travel plans, flights and hotels, and getting information about the city together to hand out to attendees.
718:
of the proposal, or even adding your name as one of the contributors in the template. (NB: I'm posting this to a lot of people, so please reply to my talkpage or to Meta) --
1295:
appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.
1222:
appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.
855:
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following
455: 1155: 818:
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the
1476: 770:. There are Google Ads on the site, but we dont make money from the project, they're just to pay for the bandwidth, storage and technical support that Wikia give us. 302:
totally incoherent and without context. Nowadays so much total garbage gets posted to Knowledge (XXG) making it hard to spot the few notable entries among the chaff.
747:
I noticed that you are interested in contributing to a community with fellow academics, and thought you might be interested in this project which I am involved in,
50: 1003:. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at 961:. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at 229:
as this is a standard name. I've tried to apply my change in a compromise manner, as all I want is for the link to work, but the real issue might be the
1086: 1046: 918: 868: 1053:
to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -
815:
sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
661:
Oh, many thanks. :-) You can write me an e-mail and we can discuss that. Unfortunately (but systemically), this is not a subject best discussed here.
1015: 1008: 973: 966: 864: 1423: 1408: 925:
to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
368:
article under the wrong heading. I will do so, not because of a feeling, but because it's not accurate to list him under another person's name.
459: 1438: 1019: 977: 884: 278: 145:
encyclopedias, although those are signed and credited to one's name. So, anonymity and the wiki system makes one not more bold, but less so.
28: 1398: 1331:
If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.
1258:
If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.
1007:
carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at
965:
carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at
46: 1472: 849: 845: 1014:
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
972:
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
1394: 1298:
It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.
1225:
It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.
1176: 17: 1106: 1143: 399:
Also: "Im Fall von Ehrenprofessuren und außerplanmäßigen Professuren handelt es sich um einen Titel (Titularprofessur)."
839: 1004: 962: 420:
I'm not sure where you got your wrong opionion from, but sorry, it is wrong. Just trust the german wikipedia article. --
176: 42:
You can sign your name on talk pages by using " ~~~ " for your username and " ~~~~ " for your username and a timestamp.
1385:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
32: 1390: 96:
Added link in the galactic rotation article. You are free to delete her listing under Einasto, if you wish, of course.
1428: 1427:
has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the
172: 1446: 1137: 914: 806: 798: 180: 714:
to add an Ancient Greek Wikisource on Meta, and I'd be very grateful if you could assist me by either voting in
61: 36: 21: 1114: 1027: 404:
In the case of honorary professors and außerplanmäßig (outside of the regular plan) professors it is a title".
1292: 1280: 1309: 1236: 1133: 929: 1468: 957: 549:
Could I trouble you for a source for this article? not apparently on German Knowledge (XXG). Best wishes,
1386: 1219: 1207: 1098: 454:
Hello, I noticed your today's disparaging comments about a Russian church. Can you tell me - do you find
1442: 1431:
guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
1042: 926: 888: 499: 467: 1183: 1094: 999: 872: 833: 810:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 1343: 1270: 1058: 937:
How can one possibly get a kick out of deleting images, especially where there is no legal issue...?
681: 491: 462:
any better, or do you dislike all colourful and extravagant architecture in principle? Just curious,
65: 1362: 1353: 1306:
If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which:
1233:
If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which:
1101: 572:
I meant only to ask you to identify whatever source it was you had used to write the article. Best,
1169: 1023: 981: 1382: 1366: 184: 1487: 822: 1197: 652: 274: 234: 230: 1378: 1370: 1149: 57: 543: 495: 463: 114: 97: 85: 1381:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1374: 1078: 878: 1339: 1266: 1054: 776: 719: 677: 639: 511: 72: 676:
Hello, Clossius. I hope you will believe that I am making a serious effort to be NPOV on
1335: 1262: 767: 612: 573: 550: 110: 710:
I understand from your userboxes you're interested in Ancient Greek. I've submitted a
1482: 1124: 938: 899: 787: 696: 685: 662: 591: 560: 533: 482: 438: 365: 347: 291: 247: 226: 213: 197: 168: 156: 146: 137: 129: 120: 732: 1320: 1247: 1193: 522: 448: 351: 324: 262: 238: 212:
No, by chance I am actually not (quite), but I'm interested in EE subecjt matters.
861:
Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged
711: 421: 763: 759: 1110:
article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the
632: 628: 431:
es ist ja oft so, daß wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiter das nicht so genau wissen,
49:. If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in 811: 378: 255: 383: 109:
Am not less impressed, but somewhat intrigued. Why no simple redirect from
355: 303: 282: 1460: 1073: 748: 737: 1369:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
321: 1492: 1450: 1402: 1347: 1274: 1201: 1062: 1031: 984: 941: 931: 902: 891: 790: 779: 722: 699: 688: 665: 655: 615: 594: 576: 563: 553: 536: 525: 502: 485: 470: 441: 358: 329: 84:
entire credit when she and Fritz Zwicky blazed the trail decades ago.
39:
button before you save, to make sure your edits do what you intended.
490:
Thanks for detailed explanation. You may want to check my article on
731: 56:
If you have any other questions about the project then check out
829: 1424:
Category:Members of the Zentrale Dombauverein zu Köln von 1842
1409:
Category:Members of the Zentrale Dombauverein zu Köln von 1842
79:
Vera Rubin discovered evidence for 'dark matter' decades ago
208:
Hello, Clossius. You are not by chance an Estonian are you?
1459: 433:
and even professorial colleagues are not always sure of the
136:
Oh, I see! (I ponder to do it anyway, but it's no hurry!) --
1104:
to this article, it would greatly help us with the current
395:
Professor is the work title of a teacher at a university.
1077:
Hello Clossius! Thank you for your contributions. I am a
518: 273:
Hello Clossius, I would like to know your opinion about
856: 1168: 1089:. Please note that all biographies of living persons 852:
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
45:
Some time when you're bored, you can read through our
1041:
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,
951:
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nurksestamp.jpg
913:
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,
1182: 1018:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 976:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 883:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 435:
herrschende Meinung in Rechtsprechung und Literatur
993:Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Emu logo.gif 409:allerdings die Emeritierung oder Pensionierung)." 1361:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 832:. If you believe the media meets the criteria at 559:You mean to insert scholarly (printed) sources? 909:Image:Hanno_Drechsler.jpeg listed for deletion 1047:Knowledge (XXG):Images and media for deletion 919:Knowledge (XXG):Images and media for deletion 846:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags#Fair use 8: 1009:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use rationale guideline 967:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use rationale guideline 225:I see you reverted my change to the link in 171:start in the archived section and check out 1456:File:HEbbinghaus.jpg listed for discussion 167:If you are a classicist can you check out 1087:Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person 1085:of the articles that you created is an 279:Knowledge (XXG):Votes for deletion/Spanos 828:tag can be used to release it under the 64:. You can also drop me a question on my 29:Knowledge (XXG):How does one edit a page 1037:Image:Defen1618.jpg listed for deletion 233:article; perhaps it should be moved to 175:and its talk page and need help at the 1314:will produce an appropriate expansion, 1241:will produce an appropriate expansion, 867:. If the image is copyrighted under a 78: 20:to Knowledge (XXG)! Drop us a note at 1467:A file that you uploaded or altered, 1334:If you have any questions please see 1261:If you have any questions please see 263:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 7: 1473:Knowledge (XXG):Files for discussion 1411:has been nominated for listification 850:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags 377:I've made the change in the article 844:or one of the other tags listed at 773:Have a look and see what you think 611:Many thanks for adding them. Best, 386:which i referenced in my change. 31:. For format questions, visit our 14: 1387:review the candidates' statements 196:really, not quite a Jaeger! ;-)) 1415: 1072: 1005:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content 963:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content 177:Knowledge (XXG):Policy thinktank 51:assigning those to your username 27:If you need editing help, visit 1291:The media file you uploaded as 1218:The media file you uploaded as 758:Its hosted by a company called 1393:. For the Election committee, 1363:Arbitration Committee election 1354:ArbCom elections are now open! 1020:media copyright questions page 978:media copyright questions page 885:Media copyright questions page 881:after 01:20, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 173:Greek Philosophies on Republic 1: 1403:22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC) 1348:12:02, 30 December 2011 (UTC) 1275:12:01, 30 December 2011 (UTC) 1032:21:04, 13 February 2008 (UTC) 672:Conflict over Conflict Thesis 666:06:58, 16 February 2006 (UTC) 656:20:29, 15 February 2006 (UTC) 616:13:32, 15 February 2006 (UTC) 595:06:09, 14 February 2006 (UTC) 577:00:32, 14 February 2006 (UTC) 564:16:21, 13 February 2006 (UTC) 554:19:03, 12 February 2006 (UTC) 537:16:10, 13 February 2006 (UTC) 526:12:59, 11 February 2006 (UTC) 1493:09:55, 5 December 2023 (UTC) 1283:needs authorship information 1210:needs authorship information 1016:criteria for speedy deletion 985:08:48, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 974:criteria for speedy deletion 865:criteria for speedy deletion 503:11:02, 3 February 2006 (UTC) 486:18:58, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 471:18:07, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 364:I wonder who duplicated the 22:Knowledge (XXG):New user log 1389:and submit your choices on 1202:19:01, 2 January 2010 (UTC) 942:19:23, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 181:Knowledge (XXG):Revisionism 1508: 1395:MediaWiki message delivery 1120:tag. Here is the article: 932:16:24, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 915:Image:Hanno_Drechsler.jpeg 877:the image will be deleted 807:Image:Hanno_Drechsler.jpeg 799:Image:Hanno_Drechsler.jpeg 791:07:52, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 700:10:02, 14 March 2006 (UTC) 689:08:36, 14 March 2006 (UTC) 517:I'm the press contact for 424:13:22, 14 July 2005 (UTC) 1439:categories for discussion 1063:01:15, 25 July 2008 (UTC) 780:01:28, 31 July 2006 (UTC) 442:18:43, 15 July 2005 (UTC) 285:10:45, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC) 265:01:00, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC) 241:00:44, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC) 75:08:11, 10 Mar 2004 (UTC) 60:or add a question to the 903:13:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 892:01:20, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 873:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use 834:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use 723:20:06, 24 May 2006 (UTC) 706:Ancient Greek Wikisource 359:16:09, 29 May 2005 (UTC) 330:05:15, 27 May 2005 (UTC) 306:15:12, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC) 294:07:00, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC) 250:08:24, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC) 216:12:06, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC) 200:20:52, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC) 187:17:06, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC) 162: 159:07:20, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC) 140:20:25, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC) 123:18:46, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC) 100:22:59, 18 Mar 2004 (UTC) 24:to introduce yourself. 1451:00:09, 4 May 2021 (UTC) 1293:File:PhilippIHesse2.jpg 1281:File:PhilippIHesse2.jpg 797:Unspecified source for 762:, which was founded by 149:06:56, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC) 132:19:22, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC) 47:policies and guidelines 1464: 741: 1471:, has been listed at 1463: 1367:Arbitration Committee 1093:. If you were to add 1045:, has been listed at 997:Thanks for uploading 958:Image:Nurksestamp.jpg 955:Thanks for uploading 917:, has been listed at 804:Thanks for uploading 735: 638:(discussion moved to 1469:File:HEbbinghaus.jpg 1434:the category's entry 1310:subst:usernameexpand 1237:subst:usernameexpand 840:non-free fair use in 836:, use a tag such as 682:Andrew Dickson White 492:Russian architecture 58:Knowledge (XXG):Help 1371:arbitration process 1220:File:Marburgalt.jpg 1208:File:Marburgalt.jpg 1043:Image:Defen1618.jpg 749:The Psychology Wiki 128:solve the problem. 1465: 1383:arbitration policy 1081:alerting you that 1000:Image:Emu logo.gif 863:, as described on 742: 342:I didn't actually 35:. You can use the 1475:. Please see the 1441:page. Thank you. 1188: 1068:Unreferenced BLPs 1049:. Please see the 921:. Please see the 736:The Logo for the 346:the article from 275:William V. Spanos 269:William V. Spanos 235:Law and Economics 231:Law and economics 221:Law and Economics 1499: 1490: 1485: 1443:RevelationDirect 1419: 1418: 1325: 1319: 1313: 1252: 1246: 1240: 1187: 1186: 1172: 1128: 1119: 1113: 1076: 869:non-free license 843: 827: 821: 544:Gustav von Ewers 494:, by the way. -- 327: 163:Plato's Republic 153:That's well put. 115:Imperial Germans 105:Imperial Germans 1507: 1506: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1488: 1483: 1458: 1420: 1416: 1413: 1391:the voting page 1357: 1350: 1323: 1317: 1307: 1285: 1277: 1250: 1244: 1234: 1212: 1129: 1117: 1115:unreferencedBLP 1111: 1091:must be sourced 1070: 1039: 995: 953: 911: 842:|article name}} 837: 825: 819: 802: 738:Psychology Wiki 730: 728:Psychology Wiki 708: 678:Conflict thesis 674: 648: 640:Talk:Xenophanes 636: 547: 515: 512:Erik S. Reinert 452: 422:de:Benutzer:Kju 375: 337: 325: 315: 271: 259: 223: 206: 165: 107: 81: 71:Happy editing, 33:manual of style 12: 11: 5: 1505: 1503: 1457: 1454: 1429:categorization 1414: 1412: 1406: 1360: 1356: 1351: 1336:Help:File page 1333: 1332: 1328: 1327: 1315: 1288:Dear uploader: 1286: 1284: 1278: 1263:Help:File page 1260: 1259: 1255: 1254: 1242: 1215:Dear uploader: 1213: 1211: 1205: 1190: 1189: 1069: 1066: 1038: 1035: 1024:BetacommandBot 994: 991: 989: 982:BetacommandBot 952: 949: 947: 945: 944: 910: 907: 906: 905: 801: 795: 794: 793: 768:Angela Beesley 729: 726: 707: 704: 703: 702: 673: 670: 669: 668: 647: 644: 635: 626: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 602: 601: 600: 599: 598: 597: 582: 581: 580: 579: 567: 566: 546: 541: 540: 539: 514: 509: 508: 507: 506: 505: 451: 446: 445: 444: 417: 416: 406: 405: 397: 396: 374: 371: 370: 369: 336: 333: 314: 311: 310: 309: 308: 307: 296: 295: 270: 267: 258: 253: 252: 251: 222: 219: 218: 217: 205: 202: 164: 161: 154: 151: 150: 134: 133: 118: 111:Reichsdeutsche 106: 103: 102: 101: 80: 77: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1504: 1495: 1494: 1491: 1486: 1480: 1479: 1474: 1470: 1462: 1455: 1453: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1435: 1430: 1426: 1425: 1410: 1407: 1405: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1355: 1352: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1338:. Thank you. 1337: 1330: 1329: 1322: 1311: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1299: 1296: 1294: 1289: 1282: 1279: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1265:. Thank you. 1264: 1257: 1256: 1249: 1238: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1226: 1223: 1221: 1216: 1209: 1206: 1204: 1203: 1199: 1195: 1185: 1181: 1178: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1163: 1160: 1157: 1154: 1151: 1148: 1145: 1142: 1139: 1135: 1132: 1131:Find sources: 1126: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1116: 1109: 1108: 1103: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1075: 1067: 1065: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1036: 1034: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1012: 1010: 1006: 1002: 1001: 992: 990: 987: 986: 983: 979: 975: 970: 968: 964: 960: 959: 950: 948: 943: 940: 936: 935: 934: 933: 930: 928: 927:Videmus Omnia 924: 920: 916: 908: 904: 901: 896: 895: 894: 893: 890: 889:Videmus Omnia 887:. Thank you. 886: 882: 880: 874: 870: 866: 862: 858: 853: 851: 847: 841: 835: 831: 824: 816: 813: 809: 808: 800: 796: 792: 789: 784: 783: 782: 781: 778: 774: 771: 769: 765: 761: 756: 752: 750: 745: 744:Hi Clossius, 739: 734: 727: 725: 724: 721: 717: 713: 705: 701: 698: 693: 692: 691: 690: 687: 683: 679: 671: 667: 664: 660: 659: 658: 657: 654: 645: 643: 641: 634: 630: 627: 617: 614: 610: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 604: 603: 596: 593: 588: 587: 586: 585: 584: 583: 578: 575: 571: 570: 569: 568: 565: 562: 558: 557: 556: 555: 552: 545: 542: 538: 535: 530: 529: 528: 527: 524: 520: 513: 510: 504: 501: 497: 493: 489: 488: 487: 484: 480: 475: 474: 473: 472: 469: 465: 461: 457: 450: 447: 443: 440: 436: 432: 427: 426: 425: 423: 412: 411: 410: 402: 401: 400: 393: 392: 391: 387: 385: 380: 372: 367: 366:Adolph Wagner 363: 362: 361: 360: 357: 353: 349: 348:Adolph Wagner 345: 340: 339:Hi, Clossius 335:Adolph Wagner 334: 332: 331: 328: 323: 318: 317:Hi Clossius, 312: 305: 300: 299: 298: 297: 293: 288: 287: 286: 284: 281:. Cordially, 280: 276: 268: 266: 264: 257: 254: 249: 244: 243: 242: 240: 236: 232: 228: 227:Wilhelm Lexis 220: 215: 211: 210: 209: 203: 201: 199: 194: 188: 186: 182: 178: 174: 170: 169:Talk:Republic 160: 158: 148: 143: 142: 141: 139: 131: 126: 125: 124: 122: 116: 112: 104: 99: 95: 94: 93: 90: 87: 76: 74: 69: 67: 63: 59: 54: 52: 48: 43: 40: 38: 34: 30: 25: 23: 19: 1477: 1466: 1432: 1422: 1421: 1358: 1300: 1297: 1290: 1287: 1227: 1224: 1217: 1214: 1191: 1179: 1173: 1165: 1158: 1152: 1146: 1140: 1130: 1105: 1090: 1082: 1071: 1040: 1022:. Thank you. 1013: 998: 996: 988: 980:. Thank you. 971: 956: 954: 946: 912: 876: 860: 854: 817: 805: 803: 775: 772: 757: 753: 746: 743: 715: 709: 675: 653:Halidecyphon 649: 637: 548: 519:no.wikipedia 516: 479:au contraire 478: 453: 449:Talk:Tallinn 434: 430: 418: 407: 398: 388: 384:de:Professor 376: 352:Adolf Wagner 343: 341: 338: 319: 316: 272: 260: 224: 207: 192: 189: 166: 152: 135: 108: 91: 82: 70: 62:Village pump 55: 44: 41: 37:Show preview 26: 15: 1316:or use the 1312:|Clossius}} 1243:or use the 1239:|Clossius}} 1156:free images 764:Jimmy Wales 456:this church 98:Ancheta Wis 86:Ancheta Wis 1478:discussion 1379:topic bans 1340:Sfan00 IMG 1267:Sfan00 IMG 1125:Jüri Allik 1055:AWeenieMan 1051:discussion 923:discussion 777:Mostly Zen 720:Nema Fakei 633:Monotheism 629:Xenophanes 415:emeritus). 313:Wikimania! 73:Isomorphic 16:Hi there. 1375:site bans 1326:template. 1253:template. 1192:Thanks!-- 1099:secondary 857:this link 823:GFDL-self 812:copyright 646:Your book 613:Staffelde 574:Staffelde 551:Staffelde 379:Professor 373:Professor 256:Max Weber 204:Estonian? 66:talk page 1095:reliable 939:Clossius 900:Clossius 879:48 hours 788:Clossius 712:proposal 697:Clossius 686:Maestlin 663:Clossius 592:Clossius 590:German. 561:Clossius 534:Clossius 483:Clossius 439:Clossius 292:Clossius 248:Clossius 214:Clossius 198:Clossius 193:Politeia 157:Ruhrjung 147:Clossius 138:Ruhrjung 130:Clossius 121:Ruhrjung 1437:on the 1194:DASHBot 1162:WP refs 1150:scholar 1102:sources 875:) then 716:Support 523:Cnyborg 239:gadfium 185:WHEELER 18:Welcome 1489:plicit 1365:. The 1134:Google 848:. See 496:Ghirla 464:Ghirla 413:-: --> 403:-: --> 394:-: --> 1177:JSTOR 1138:books 871:(per 760:Wikia 1447:talk 1399:talk 1344:talk 1271:talk 1198:talk 1170:FENS 1144:news 1059:talk 1028:talk 830:GFDL 766:and 680:and 500:talk 468:talk 460:this 344:move 322:+sj 1359:Hi, 1321:own 1248:own 1184:TWL 1107:697 1079:bot 458:or 356:Deb 350:to 304:jni 283:jni 179:at 113:to 68:. 1449:) 1401:) 1377:, 1346:) 1324:}} 1318:{{ 1308:{{ 1273:) 1251:}} 1245:{{ 1235:{{ 1200:) 1164:) 1127:- 1118:}} 1112:{{ 1097:, 1061:) 1030:) 859:. 838:{{ 826:}} 820:{{ 751:. 642:) 631:/ 498:| 466:| 155:-- 119:-- 53:. 1484:✗ 1445:( 1397:( 1342:( 1269:( 1196:( 1180:· 1174:· 1166:· 1159:· 1153:· 1147:· 1141:· 1136:( 1083:1 1057:( 1026:( 740:. 651:- 326:+ 183:. 117:?

Index

Welcome
Knowledge (XXG):New user log
Knowledge (XXG):How does one edit a page
manual of style
Show preview
policies and guidelines
assigning those to your username
Knowledge (XXG):Help
Village pump
talk page
Isomorphic
Ancheta Wis
Ancheta Wis
Reichsdeutsche
Imperial Germans
Ruhrjung
Clossius
Ruhrjung
Clossius
Ruhrjung
Talk:Republic
Greek Philosophies on Republic
Knowledge (XXG):Policy thinktank
Knowledge (XXG):Revisionism
WHEELER
Clossius
Clossius
Wilhelm Lexis
Law and economics
Law and Economics

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.