User talk:Clinkophonist - Knowledge (XXG)

808:

Ottawa Citizen, 3 November 1977, pg5. 5. ^ "Mall 'prophet' jailed again", Ottawa Citizen, 5 November 1977, pg 5. 6. ^ "Prophet hauled out of Commons gallery", Ottawa Citizen, 18 October 1977, pg 3. 7. ^ "Gagged protester gets heave-ho", Ottawa Today, 18 October 1977. 8. ^ "Masked protester returns", The Ottawa Citizen, July 15, 1978 9. ^ Jane Taber "'Prophet' fined for shouting at Nov. 11 service", Ottawa Citizen, 3 January 1986 10. ^ "Anti-war speech costs man $ 250", Globe and Mail, 3 January 1986 11. ^ "Cormier condamné", Le Droit, 3 January 1986 12. ^ Steve St. Laurent. "Visiting 'prophet' no average preacher", Calgary Herald, 18 July 1981, A11. 13. ^ Cathy Lord "Visions compelled search for God", Edmonton Journal, 25 July 1981,G13. 14. ^ Leslie Cole "Self-proclaimed prophet: Showmanship not his style", Whitehorse Star, 26 August 1981, pg 3 15. ^ Nicholas Read "'Divine gifts' inspire ex-executive to tramp the land with a message", Vancouver Sun, 3 October 1981 16. ^ Maclean's Magazine, pg 40 31 August 1981, People Section. 17. ^ Richard Caron "Raymond Cormier sillonne le pays pour precher Dieu", Le Soliel, 28 July 1986 18. ^ Elizabeth Hanton "Prophet sees Canada as the new Israel", The Halifax Daily News, 11 August 1986 19. ^ Sylvia Reddom "Shares Faith With Canadians - Religion More Than Going To Church Says Travelling Born Again Christian", The Charlottetown Guardian, 20 August 1986 20. ^ Emily Dyckson "Wandering prophet shares his faith", The Weekend (St. John's), 30 August 1986 21. ^ History of Federal Ridings since 1867 22. ^ Kernaghan R. Webb Focus Magazine September1984 'RJC: Cormier makes people nervous. Especially authorities.' 23. ^ Elections Canada On-Line | General Information 24. ^ Kathleen Patterson "Prophet Chooses Park for Vigil" The Kansas City Times pg. 3A 13 September 1976 25. ^ Robert W. Butler "Prophet Plans Appeal of Conviction" The Kansas City Times 2 November 1976

414:

most of his land, but left him with what I didn't take." In addition, you provide no scholarly interpretations, most of which you claim I contradict. I realized upon reading the actual Biblical accounts and the text on the Prism (available at that site I referenced) that my initial skepticism (related to other historic precedents of rulers boasting of conquests on monuments and steles that never happened or are grossly exaggerated relative to truth) was misplaced and that I could not imply that "a conquest never happened." You will note that I subsequently edited my addition to reflect this understanding. I find it difficult to understand how, even after my edits reflecting this, you could take issue with my editing, when it is obvious that I am changing it as my understanding changes, not matching my editing to some preconceived doctrine. If you are able to reference other translations and/or interpretations of the Prism, I would appreciate it if you could include them in the wiki article itself, as I notice that you do not.

1063:"Your servant has been keeping his father's sheep. When a lion or a bear came and carried off a sheep from the flock, I went after it, struck it and rescued the sheep from its mouth. When it turned on me, I seized it by its hair, struck it and killed it. Your servant has killed both the lion and the bear; this uncircumcised Philistine will be like one of them, because he has defied the armies of the living God. The LORD who delivered me from the paw of the lion and the paw of the bear will deliver me from the hand of this Philistine." Saul said to David, "Go, and the LORD be with you." (1 Samuel 17:33=37 447:

the Old Testament claim that a promise was made and kept (and only that Jerusalem would not fall, not that some major victory would be won throughout Judea - the website with the Prism translation I referenced, unfortunately, turns out to be biased, and for that I must apologize, though I expect its translation to be relatively neutral), and this bears itself out by confirmation from the translation of the Prism that while much else was indeed taken, Jerusalem itself did not fall. The NIV version of the Bible does indicate that Sennacherib assaulted

1362:: On February 28th the Daily Mail published an article by Tom Cox, in which Prof. Dr. Klaus Schmidt, leader of the Göbekli Tepe excavations, is cited as follows: "Göbekli Tepe is a temple in Eden". On the basis of this, the author formulates several conclusions about the biblical paradise, Adam and Eve and other events connected to the Book of Genesis in the Old Testament. Several German- and Turkish-language newspapers and radio stations of german and turkish language have picked up on the contents of the article since its publication. 1176:

detail is important is this, that I think many think of David as very young when he killed Goliath, obviously not everyone. That may have been true, but that is one reason why I think his statement about killing a lion and a bear is important and interesting, since killing those kinds of animals is not, perhaps, the same as killing a fox or cat or dog, and tends to show something about David at the time of the confrontation. I didn't intend to offend anyone by using 70 AD. The Gobekli tepe article that was cited is here:

533:

at any level of academia outside of my own independent study. Thus, while my assessments or interpretations may seem biased or unbalanced, it is only an indication of my lack of extensive experience, which I try to obtain through other means. It is certainly unbalanced, and quite hostile, to hold everyone else to your standard of scholarly rigor in your field (and I may be mistaken when I assume here that you are a student/scholar of history) when only a few have actually had the training.

603: 440:

case - and some of them must be objectively documented (i.e. some of the sources must not only use that phrase but must also be clearly describing a literal annexation that is known without a doubt to have happened), the words must be taken literally, rather than assuming that they are a euphemism for another phenomenon. To dictate to others what some phrase or another means is not academic, nor is it at all a rigorously consistent standard.

1364:"Tom Cox" or "Tom Knox" is a pseudonym of the British journalist Sean Thomas, who used the article to get publicity for his thriller "Genesis Secret", which is due to appear in March in English and simultaneously in German. Since Sean Thomas is using a falsified version of an interview with Klaus Schmidt made in fall 2006, he presents a distortion of the scientific work of the German Archaeological Institute. 81:, I give notice that I am sitting down with the three classic original source texts (Puylaurens, Vaux-de-Cernay and de Tudèle - the last in the Livre de Poche edition as the Martin-Chabot is long out of print) to add the missing inline citations to this page. I do not intend at this point to make any textual alterations, but if comments are made which are NOT justified, be prepared to state your sources now. 1773: 1584: 243: 1128:. The summary is more encyclopaedically pertinent than the detail; its the summary that's more important. Encyclopedia articles should be written from a top down approach (ie. 'here is a summary. here is a summary of how that summary breaks down. here is some more detail. here is more detail about that detail.' rather than 'here is lots and lots of detail. here is a summary of it'). 765:. They concerned me. I wondered if perhaps you have some obvious motivation or bias. So I read your user page, to see if you were honest/open about some of your possible biases. I saw the link to the article. I read the article - it fails to establish notability. References are fairly irrelevant - read the article (including the version at your link below); it doesn't establish 1486: 1409: 1669: 572:

it (if there is even a single authoritative version of the Bible, at that) is lying. If you're going to make blanket statements like that, you had better be prepared to back it up with hard, irrefutable evidence, which you fail to do at every turn. Yet you accuse others of original research. On top of that, comparing this to the neo-Nazi denials of the Holocaust is quite

1158:

fended them off. Perhaps he helped them lamb. Perhaps he lead them away from a treacherous mountainside during a storm. Maybe it rained one day so he made little paper hats for the sheep. Whatever; its not encyclopedic - shepherds did that sort of thing all the time, it comes with the job. 'He had previously killed predatory animals to protect his flock' will do.

455:; you cannot authoritatively claim that the one and only "Bible recounts a successful Assyrian attack...." and so on and then contrast this with the claim on the Prism as if they are somehow significantly different, because different versions of the Bible do recount Assyrian attacks (and successes) remarkably similar to the claims made on the Prism. 1849: 375:

I used (though perhaps to different versions of the Bible available on the site), are the reasons why I decided to go with NIV as opposed to Bibleverse, which IMO is not any more or less neutral than the site I linked to (since you can also choose a different version on that site as well). The "HE" was a copy/paste hanger-on, the significance

1143:

summary as you read it - therefore it should not occur before the first two thirds. Secondly, all that your reading of it adds to your reading of the summary is 'by Saul on account of the success'; the quote is bulky, and is therefore hugely unnecessary as adding 'by Saul, on account of the success' to the summary would do instead.

576:, as there is no real confusion as to the occurrence and objective documentation of the Holocaust and therefore Holocaust deniers are really just deceiving themselves. Comparing the Bible, a biased historical document, with the Prism, another biased historical document (if only for propaganda purposes), is far less clear-cut. 388:

wikipedia's behalf that allows the user to choose from all bible versions online which can be linked to; biblegateway only occurs so frequently on that list because it hosts significantly more versions than other sites do etc - 'more' is not the same as 'wider range'. For guidance on using template XYZAFGH see

1175:

To finish this discussion, 1 and 2 I don't really understand all the fuss, but okay, sorry about that, it is not the first and won't be last mistake I ever make. 3- I always felt the summary was a bit rushed, and could be a bit more clear, that is all, just my opinion. As to 4 the reason I feel the

1055:

I disagree because I think the conversation is important for a number of reasons, including the fact that it provides a few details about David's life prior to this event, including killing a lion and bear. Further the summary from the article, as it was, stated Saul reluctantly allows David to make

374:

2) With regards to bibleverse v. NIV: please notice that I wasn't able to get the bibleverse links/references to appear properly, which is the reason why I looked around for other formats that I could use. That, and the fact that most of the Bibleverse links lead to the same website as the NIV format

807:

1. ^ "Preacher Arrested on Mall" Ottawa Citizen 3 September 1977 2. ^ Dave Rogers, "Second police warning for God's emissary", Ottawa Citizen, 10 September 1977, A2. 3. ^ "Emissary from God undaunted", Ottawa Citizen, 22 October 1977, pg 2. 4. ^ "The self-styled prophet hauled off Mall again",

797:

but please keep in mind the BLP is not finished unless you get the consensus you wish. It is a lamentation that as a scribe, you would choose words like this, ¨Activities appear to be no more significant than incidents of petty theft or occasional graffiti¨ in pressing your case for deletion. It is

532:

I had already conceded that, and your response only seems to indicate hostility towards criticism or legitimate inquiry into your basic assumptions, for which you provide no sources or backup whatsoever. While I am an enthusiast of history, I did not have the opportunity to extensively study history

387:

Biblegateway is run by a protestant bible society. They seem to refuse to host Roman Catholic version, recent academic versions, Jewish versions, etc. as well as (for obvious reasons) certain copyrighted versions. Linking to it preferentially isn't neutral. The bibleverse links link to a tool run on

571:

That was a rhetorical question. Perhaps you're taking this all a bit too seriously? On top of that, there is no doubt that the parts of the Bible, like any other historical document/piece of evidence, has its biases. But simply because it has biases, like everything else, doesn't mean flat-out that

446:

You seem to somehow think that I am taking one side or another in some major confrontation. If I am, I am unaware of this, and I will be sure to be more careful. That Jerusalem was maintained was not meant to be a point (on my part, that is) about some Judaic victory, but to show that that parts of

439:

is a historic euphemism for annexed. Nor does anyone else. At this point, as far as I know, you are putting words into the mouths (or, more accurately, the writing utensils) of ancient scribes who may have used such wording. Until it's unequivocably clear, from a number of sources, that this is the

400:

3) I wasn't "shoring up my own side," as I have no particular "side." In addition, I wasn't trying to fuel some sort of debate as you seem to imply; I was adding another point (perhaps you misunderstood what I meant by "argument," for which I suppose "another possibility" might be more appropriate)

1142:

3. Quote for David's rank behaviour. You read the summary as 'David was an armor-bearer, killed Goliath, then was made commander of the army', you read your quote as saying 'David was so succesful that Saul gave him a high rank in the army'. Firstly, this quote only addresses the last third of the

510:

Well, lets see, Gaius Julius Caesar is stabbed 36 times in the Senate, then Marcus Junius Brutus stabs him. He dies. Why did he die? You could blame it entirely on Brutus, but to do that you'd have to overlook the fact that by that point he had 36 stab wounds. In the same way, a historian writes a

413:

4) You request references from me, some of which I had included (i.e. those coming from versions of the Bible), yet you provide none of your own. Please direct me to reliable sources that clearly indicate that "diminished his land" is clearly the same as "annexed his territory" as opposed to "took

308:

Unfortunately I wasn't around to be able to comment, but I've had a look at the archives and I have to say I find your introductions a little fatuously prejudiced, but I do like your 'bible primary' template. However, I can't really see why, if you're willing to create something like that, you had

1179:

I have no way of knowing if it is true or not but that is where the information came from. If it contradicts the wiki article I also have no way of knowing if the wiki article is correct either. As to the Nag Hammadi library, I think it is more appropriate to say they are gnostic writings about

1157:

4. Your other addition of a quote. Knowledge (XXG) isn't a mindless collection of trivia. Minor details are not important; no-one cares about the numerous fauna that preyed on his sheep. He doubtless killed one or two foxes for the same reason. Perhaps a poacher attacked his sheep one day, and he

1034:

This was done for transition. From the summary it read to me like David was an armor-bearer, killed Goliath, then was made commander of the army. I think this text clarifies that: The Bible states: "Whatever Saul sent him to do, David did it so successfully that Saul gave him a high rank in the

1366:

The German Archaeological Institute (DAI) distances itself from these statements and reserves the right to take legal action against further dissemination of the story in connection with the work of the DAI at Göbekli Tepe. Klaus Schmidt neither in an interview nor on any other occasion made the

1062:

Here it is: "David said to Saul, "Let no one lose heart on account of this Philistine; your servant will go and fight him." Saul replied, "You are not able to go out against this Philistine and fight him; you are only a boy, and he has been a fighting man from his youth." But David said to Saul,

528:

All this stuff has been handed over, his own daughters included, and Hezekiah has submitted to Sennacherib; why would he do that? Maybe Hezekiah was utterly bored and fancied some excitement, maybe he found Sennacherib attractive and wanted to impress him, maybe he became a Buddhist monk and was

554:

Because the bible is lying, or it was written so long after the events that no-one could remember properly so they made it up. Its a very obvious answer. The bible has a theological prejudice that makes it heavily pro-hezekiah (and very anti-manasseh). You might as well ask why Neo-Nazi's keep

505:

The Prism isn't clear why the siege was lifted, though it does take note of the tribute it took from Hezekiah. I suppose though you could probably make the claim that as the tribute appears chronologically after the siege of Jerusalem began, this position indicates that the tribute was paid to

498:

I am not judging the Prism by the Bible, actually; I am not judging the Prism at all in this particular argument. I am trying to judge what versions of the Bible are saying about historical events based on the order in which they appear, which may in this case be misleading. Not only was I not

367:

capitulate, just that Jerusalem itself wasn't taken (be it by surrender/tribute or some other means). "Corroborated (via implication) by the notable lack of mention on the prism regarding any entry into Jerusalem" only refers to this fact; it isn't meant to imply that somehow Hezekiah emerged

1210:

Clarity is provided by the correct article link. Further clarity is not needed. The use of AD vs. CE is very controversial. The article seems to have used CE/BCE previously; the Manual of Style guidelines therefore insist that, if used at all (which is discouraged), it should be CE/BCE not

1024:), when the text already summarises it. Quoting is discouraged, except where the quoted text is itself notable in its own right (eg. the quote is well known, or widely considered interesting in its own right as a piece of text). You'll notice that the subsequent text does quote the bible - 924:

What exactly has Israel got to do with anything on the question of notability of Ray Joseph Cormier? Please don't bring off-topic matters into this. If you start using Knowledge (XXG) for polemicism, I'm afraid I'm going to have to take up your behaviour with higher authorities.

339:

edit, I think you missed my subsequent edits in which I eliminate the bias and the weasel words on my own cognizance. I find it highly suspect that you pick and choose certain edits (outdated ones at that) to attempt to indicate that you somehow think I am a biased editor.

309:

such a problem with the 'bible as fact', which said essentially exactly the same thing. Similarly I can't see what the problem with 'in religion universe' was, when its the same as the 'bible primary' template but extended to using other texts and opinions stemming from

409:

in particular, neither of which I had any part in and there whose neutrality I cannot vouch for; if they are not indeed neutral, I am so far unaware of this). I've also linked directly to the passages contributing to the possibility, which you seem to have missed.

901:

Evidently other Editors do not share your bleak POV and assessment. Did you actually read anything about the subject? With the current political stalemate in Israel, it´s too bad you didn´t notice Reference #18. It´s much more significant than biscuits and jams.

1797:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

499:

ignoring the Prism's order of events, I was making note of the difference between it and the order appearing in the Bible. If that tribute mentioned in versions of the Bible doesn't actually refer to the same tribute, then to what else could it possibly refer?

1116:

for the subsequent descriptions of three specific episodes. Without it its just 'and now, here are 3 randomly selected episodes from David's life' - there needs to be an explanation of why those particular 3 are mentioned. That is what the summary is for.

1082:

Its better to reply on your own page, and then add a {{tb}} to mine; the way you've replied above doesn't make it clear which bits are those that I wrote and which bits you have written. To avoid further confusion, I will reply below, rather than inline.

484:

You're judging the prism by the bible. The prism is over 500 years older than the oldest surviving copy of the bible. An academic would view the younger document in light of the older one, if anything. The prism clearly has capture of other cities -:

1214:

Consistency is very important. Don't contradict the Gobekli Tepe article, when mentioning it. Please read the talk page there, and you'll see why the article outside of wikipedia was discounted from having an ability to substantiate the claim made.

435:, if anything, is original research, uncorroborated by any sources (if you have them, please provide them; I'd asked for that originally, and I see you have yet to cite anything). I have no real reason to take it as absolute or accepted truth that 815:

To me, that looks very much like extremely minor news. Much like "Mrs Winslow wins Welsh jam contest with her strawberry preserve", "Mrs Winslow is announced winner of Newcastle WI jam competition", "Mrs Winslow does it again with her latest

355:, the Egyptians laid seige to Megiddo, but eventually the kings of Megiddo and Kadesh (who was also in the city) sent out jewels, money, and their own children; the Egyptians did not set foot in Megiddo but they had still won, and Megiddo 359:

capitulated - the Egyptian empire expanded considerably as a result. You don't give up your own children (like Hezekiah), vast chunks of money, gold from your temple doors, and your concubines, if you were the one that didn't capitulate.

351:. You added the phrase "corroborated (via implication) by the notable lack of mention on the prism regarding any entry into Jerusalem"; not only is that the most weaselly thing I've read in years, but its also Original Research. In the 920:

Characterising a challenge to the notability of Ray Joseph Cormier as 'bleak' is really stretching things quite a bit. It wouldn't be 'bleak' even if half the current articles in Knowledge (XXG) were deleted. Please, get some sense of

190: 183: 1523: 48:

article disconfirms your assertion. Would you be willing and to document your assertion from a reference within the Book of the Dead? If you can't find a primary source, what is your 2ndary source? Thx for your assistance.

1310: 1206:. AD was not added to cause controversy, but the date was added for clarity. The addition of Gobleki tepe was based on an article outside of wikipedia, which was cited. Please help improve that list in any way you can. 1009:- in which you remove the summary phrasing - ie. you remove the explanation of what is significant about the subsequent three points; without these words they are just random extracts from the story. Why did you do this? 494:

tribute occurring before the siege doesn't mean you can ignore the prism's order of events, in an article about the prism, and adjust it to the bible's claim; it doesn't even mean that it's referring to the same tribute.

109:

There really isn't that much activity at that project, which is why it hasn't been noticed. The more active projects seem to be the Christianity and Judaism projects, and it might make more sense to leave comments there.

462:

It specifically says that Hezekiah was overcome by Sennacherib, and that he was abandoned by his re-enforcements, then that he gave huge tribute, and that he sent messengers to confirm that he submitted to Sennacherib.

971:

I didn't make those changes, about Gobekli Tepe or the Jerusalem sacking. The only changes I made to the article were clarifications on the Black Obelisk, and I added the Balaam inscription and Letter of Aristeas. --

1801:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

43:

Dear C: Your 18:07, 22 April 2006 Clinkophonist edit of the above article added a new next-to-last paragraph to the Meaning section. It does not document the first sentence. My check of external sources at the

1727:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1261:(ie. whether they are the deviation, or whether what became mainstream christianity is the deviation) is a POV claim, and therefore removing the Nag Hammadi texts on these grounds is heavily in violation of 142:

I agree. However, if there is no real activity at the Bible project, and there isn't, then the logical choice for such discussion would be with the other groups which do relate to the subject. I acknowledge

1794: 151:, also deal with the subject, and you might want to contact them as well. But, honestly, leaving a message on a project page which no one seems to be watching isn't likely to get many results. 1423:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also 1637: 1632: 1627: 1622: 1861: 368:

victorious, when both the Bible and the Prism are fairly clear that he didn't. You're taking my lines out of context, and I think that's certainly more weaselly than anything I ever said.

1500: 1434:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

1548: 1435: 1306: 949:

You have placed several tags on the subject article, but did not discuss your reasons in the Article Talk. Knowledge (XXG) policies require you to do so, or remove the tags.

1655: 529:

giving up all his worldly things; but the blatantly obvious answer, as obvious as 'blue' is to 'what colour does the sky look', is that it was how he got the siege lifted.

251:

You are receiving this invitation because you are a member of one of the related Christianity Projects and I thought that you might be interested in this project also -

1530: 383:

version (simply because it's the one with which I'm most familiar), but the site I used doesn't have it :( Thanks for the tip on how to use Bibleverse - I'll try that.

237:

as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Christianity, but prefers that all Christian traditions are fairly and accurately represented.

811:

Obviously the Article as it is currently does not reflect these References. Another Editor, now having all these original References in hand, is re-working the BLP.

1028:- but this is a comparatively well known phrase in its own right; its a definite saying. Your quote is not. Please therefore explain why you thought it worth adding? 1503:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 862: 1112:

2. Summary vs. no summary. If the summary is imprecise, make it more precise. Removing it altogether is inappropriate, as doing so removes the explanation of the

868:, but still not notable for wikipedia. And if you are wondering where I got his name - I actually just made it up and googled to find if there were any matches. 777:. It doesn't matter how many references from sources of whatever significance you have; if the article doesn't establish notability, then it shouldn't be there. 476:

Both the Bible and the Prism indicate that Hezekiah did pay tribute (but differ in what was paid), but versions of the Bible note that this tribute was paid

1784: 1543: 539:(which then begs the question of why the Biblical versions are so drastically different in their depiction of the siege when compared with the Prism). 148: 1177: 1553: 229:

The goal of WikiProject Christianity is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Christianity available on Knowledge (XXG).

33:

From time to time, I will not be in England, and won't be able to respond, so sorry if I don't get back to you as speedily as other editors.

1857: 1841: 1535: 223: 208: 1752: 699:

You were an early contributor to the subject. There is now a revived discussion of the article, and your participation would be welcome.

352: 1474: 1398: 1813: 425:

is inaccurate; the prism says that Hezekiah became a tributary, so its actually 'what I took but allowed him to rent back' - see

27: 22: 17: 1748: 1539: 1000:

That was a mistake, I meant to correct it. -The link had a lowercase "b" I think, and I meant to replace it with an upper-case.

1689: 843: 144: 1518:

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Religion articles needing distinction between internal and external views

1416: 1359:

I've added this to the appropriate talk pages. Just in case you miss it: "From the Deutsches Archaeologisches Institut:

1788: 1739:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

1496: 1337: 287: 265:

Thanks for the invite, but I'm not really able to access the internet frequently enough to be in so many WikiProjects.

1744: 774: 757:

article. I don´t know how much of the history or two archives in the article Talk you read or the old version here:

280: 1673: 1499:. I do not think that this article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at 853: 825:- you'll notice that that's a red link, the article doesn't belong in Knowledge (XXG). Here's an article by him 1036: 850: 652: 645: 1345: 520:'the king of jerusalem sent to the assyrians vast amounts of money, jewels, artworks, even his own children' 458:

In addition, you claim that Hezekiah bribed Sennacherib to leave Jerusalem. The Prism isn't clear on this.

1492: 1478: 1424: 648:, replacing "NewName" with the new name for the article. This creates the required template for you there. 1819: 1322: 1253:

They predate almost all surviving ancient copies of the new testament books. Additionally, the claim that

977: 299: 198: 1853: 1740: 1314: 1697: 1685: 1420: 1402: 1387: 1288: 1243: 1185: 1073: 865: 770: 747: 581: 544: 256: 156: 115: 37: 1459:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 548: 452: 429:. So what you actually have in total is 'took his land, but allowed him to rent back a small portion'. 1864:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.

614: 595: 480:

Sennacherib threatens Jerusalem, and thus was not paid to Sennacherib to lift the siege of Jerusalem.

389: 336: 1827: 1464: 1372: 954: 907: 887: 704: 573: 1716: 1707: 994:- edit. You removed the correct link, and replaced it with a link to the disambiguation page; why? 822: 675: 401:

or possible conclusion about the genealogy that has been raised elsewhere (see the wiki articles on

1681: 1231: 1090:

link. That explanation makes sense. But it would have been easier, and better, to just correct the

846: 832: 393: 78: 1736: 1720: 801:

These References were in the Article before the last attempt at deletion less than two weeks ago.

82: 1266: 1216: 1159: 1144: 1129: 1099: 926: 869: 778: 733: 558: 380: 314: 266: 166: 128: 91: 59: 313:

the religion, rather than just the bible, and rather than only covering bible-based religions.

124:

But its not about Christianity or Judaism. Its about the Bible. A document. I've left a note at

687: 1869: 1779: 1763: 1546:. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 1318: 1113: 973: 295: 194: 1732: 1724: 1262: 377:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Clinkophonist&action=edit&section=7of

1693: 1445:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

1383: 1284: 1239: 1181: 1069: 683: 602: 577: 540: 252: 152: 111: 50: 45: 1735:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1728: 1456: 1446: 1439: 1428: 291: 1807: 1561: 1507: 1460: 1368: 1120:

In particular you are looking at the article 'the wrong way round'. You are reading it as

950: 903: 883: 700: 426: 1301:

Additional information needed on Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/78.144.172.188

1203: 667: 626: 610: 1340:

which you may be able to answer. Can you please return to that discussion to answer it?

753:

I have to presume you came across the subject BLP because of my request you look at the

1095: 1091: 1087: 723: 1650: 1415:

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for

659:

to the bottom of the page, which will automatically create a discussion section there.

511:

history; they say, in this order, adjacent to one another without intervening events:

1677: 1449:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

826: 125: 1180:

figures described in the Bible. Is that an accurate statement and fair compromise?

1865: 1583: 1531:

Category:Religion articles needing distinction between internal and external views

1862:

Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 29#Religious authority

1309:. This is an automated notice to inform you that the case is currently missing a 1341: 679: 466:

Fair enough. This, however, corroborates my earlier point that Jerusalem itself

191:

Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Organisation of Bible articles

184:

Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Organisation of Bible articles

1485: 1408: 856: 1557: 402: 242: 523:'the king of jerusalem sent messengers to confirm that he accepted servitude' 1873: 1834: 1756: 1701: 1565: 1512: 1468: 1391: 1376: 1349: 1326: 1292: 1274: 1258: 1247: 1224: 1189: 1167: 1152: 1137: 1107: 1077: 981: 958: 934: 911: 891: 877: 793:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Ray_Joseph_Cormier&oldid=220975243

786: 741: 727: 719: 708: 585: 566: 406: 322: 303: 274: 260: 202: 174: 160: 136: 119: 99: 85: 67: 53: 1049:. Please do not quote when a summary will do. Its just not encyclopaedic. 1015:

I thought the summary might be imprecise, but as always I could be wrong.

1848: 1317:

why a check is valid. Please revisit the page and add this. Sincerely,

1064: 1021:

I'd also like to know why you've inserted a minor quote from the bible (

1723:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

1254: 1235: 859: 1522: 1122:....here are some details...., which can be summarised as situation X 286:

I have nominated this template for deletion under Knowledge (XXG)'s

1506:

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.

629:. Requests that remain incomplete will be removed after five days. 1126:

Situation X occurred (if you want the details, here they are.....)

842:-, here's a reference to him on the Manchester University website 775:

Knowledge (XXG) is not an indiscriminate collection of information

379:

which I was unaware (sorry). I would personally prefer to use the

1035:

army. This pleased all the people, and Saul's officers as well."

517:'the king of jerusalem was abandoned by his army re-enforcements' 1056:

the attempt, and I am not sure that inference is correct either.

762: 754: 693: 1852:

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect

1795:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Alatrism (2nd nomination)

1046:

Similarly you've done the same sort of thing with this edit -

835: 829: 1026:

Saul has slain his thousands, and David his tens of thousands

1582: 1521: 1407: 674:

If you need any further guidance, please leave a message at

601: 1501:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Christianised rituals

1783:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

1436:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Ray Joseph Cormier 3

1674:

Template_talk:Catholicism#Edit_request_on_7_December_2012

1360: 1307:

Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/78.144.172.188

490:

Hezekiah sends tribute. Just because the bible mentions

1777:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

1047: 1022: 1007: 992: 792: 376: 349: 1663:

Request for consensus for editing Template:Catholicism

1043:

Again it may not read like that and I could be wrong.

617:

to a different title - however your request is either

470:

saved, albeit by Hezekiah's capitulation and tribute.

363:

Never in that entire section did I ever say Hezekiah

1068:

If you have any other questions please let me know.

625:for being controversial, and has been moved to the 1367:above mentioned statements." That's pretty clear. 651:Added a place for discussion at the bottom of the 1715:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 1688:. I am messaging you because you are a member of 1676:to edit the list of Doctors of the Church to add 664:{{subst:RMlink|PageName|NewName|reason for move}} 1654:For submissions and subscriptions contact the 1238:texts. I do not think they belong on the list. 864:. Asa Winstanley is clearly more notable than 392:; for guidance on the bibleverse template see 290:. Please feel free to join the discussion at 8: 1534:, which you created, has been nominated for 1234:back. I removed it because those are later 655:. This can easily be accomplished by adding 222:You are cordially invited to participate in 555:claiming that the holocaust never happened. 149:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Religious texts 77:Having discussed the withdrawal of GA with 1672:You are invited to join the discussion at 653:talk page of the page you want to be moved 627:incomplete and contested proposals section 147:and, to an extent, the currently inactive 1785:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 488:Hezekiah's mercenaries abandon him -: --> 1338:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review#Gene_Ray 1094:article by making it into a redirect to 657:{{subst:RMtalk|NewName|reason for move}} 514:'jerusalem is beseiged by the assyrians' 506:convince Sennacherib to lift the siege. 330: 1455:This is an automatic notification by a 489:Hezekiah overcome by Sennacherib -: --> 331:Please don't throw around accusations 7: 1638:Spotlight on WikiProject Catholicism 676:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Requested moves 646:talk page of the page you want moved 632:Please make sure you have completed 1495:, an article that you created, for 1198:Further note - list of artifacts... 838:- not petty little local news, but 798:a very poor and unfair comparison. 353:Battle of Megiddo (15th century BC) 1690:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject_Saints 1202:I made the 70 AD addition and the 849:, an article in a different paper 678:or contact me on my talk page. - 14: 1793:The article will be discussed at 1741:review the candidates' statements 1633:Fun and Exciting Contest Launched 145:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Books 1860:. This discussion will occur at 1847: 1840:"Religious authority" listed at 1771: 1667: 1484: 845:, here's their wikipedia page - 609:You recently filed a request at 593: 423:left him with what I didn't take 241: 611:Knowledge (XXG):Requested moves 1747:. For the Election committee, 1717:Arbitration Committee election 1708:ArbCom elections are now open! 666:to the top of today's section 1: 1874:13:21, 29 December 2021 (UTC) 1835:21:22, 24 December 2020 (UTC) 1757:13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 709:20:44, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 688:07:38, 22 February 2009 (UTC) 567:21:11, 28 February 2009 (UTC) 549:05:50, 22 February 2009 (UTC) 323:20:25, 15 February 2009 (UTC) 281:Template:in-religion-universe 275:20:11, 15 February 2009 (UTC) 189:Please see the discussion at 175:19:47, 24 February 2008 (UTC) 161:19:25, 24 February 2008 (UTC) 137:19:18, 24 February 2008 (UTC) 120:19:04, 24 February 2008 (UTC) 90:And what is my part in this? 1702:16:55, 7 December 2012 (UTC) 1628:What are You doing For Lent? 1469:01:10, 30 October 2009 (UTC) 1336:I have posted a question at 1305:Hello. Thank you for filing 1006:Also, please explain this - 861:, another article elsewhere 852:, an article somewhere else 86:17:51, 12 October 2007 (UTC) 1743:and submit your choices on 1429:What Knowledge (XXG) is not 1419:. The nominated article is 292:WP:TFD#in-religion-universe 1889: 1749:MediaWiki message delivery 1513:14:29, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 1425:Knowledge (XXG):Notability 1392:06:04, 25 April 2009 (UTC) 1377:09:29, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 1350:21:16, 14 March 2009 (UTC) 967:Biblical artifacts article 959:00:38, 10 March 2009 (UTC) 304:00:45, 1 August 2008 (UTC) 261:04:26, 24 April 2008 (UTC) 203:03:08, 11 March 2008 (UTC) 54:19:51, 6 August 2006 (UTC) 1684:and do this by embedding 1566:01:46, 21 June 2010 (UTC) 1554:Categories for discussion 1442:with four tildes (~~~~). 1327:18:55, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 1293:00:52, 9 March 2009 (UTC) 1275:17:56, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 1248:16:56, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 1225:17:56, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 1190:00:07, 9 March 2009 (UTC) 1168:18:35, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 1153:18:35, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 1138:18:35, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 1108:18:35, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 1078:16:38, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 982:20:28, 7 March 2009 (UTC) 935:14:06, 7 March 2009 (UTC) 912:19:06, 1 March 2009 (UTC) 892:06:26, 1 March 2009 (UTC) 878:18:21, 1 March 2009 (UTC) 787:18:21, 1 March 2009 (UTC) 742:00:31, 1 March 2009 (UTC) 728:00:23, 1 March 2009 (UTC) 586:18:20, 3 April 2009 (UTC) 487:jerusalem besieged -: --> 100:13:33, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 68:13:34, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 1842:Redirects for discussion 1787:or whether it should be 1651:WikiProject Christianity 1270: 1220: 1163: 1148: 1133: 1103: 1098:. I have now done this. 930: 873: 855:, and another reference 831:, here's a photo of his 782: 737: 594:Request to move article 562: 348:of your several edits - 318: 270: 224:WikiProject Christianity 209:WikiProject Christianity 170: 132: 95: 63: 1856:and has thus listed it 1587: 1526: 1412: 991:Please explain this - 606: 486:people deported -: --> 165:I'll post it at both. 1721:Arbitration Committee 1686:Template:Churchdoctor 1586: 1525: 1493:Christianised rituals 1479:Christianised rituals 1475:Articles for deletion 1447:articles for deletion 1411: 1313:, which indicates to 761:I read your edits to 605: 437:took most of his land 419:took most of his land 344:This is the combined 214:Hello Clinkophonist! 38:Feeding the multitude 1549:the category's entry 1438:. Please be sure to 451:fortified town (see 1854:Religious authority 1725:arbitration process 1682:Hildegard of Bingen 1232:Nag Hammadi library 847:User:Asa Winstanley 714:The Bible Unearthed 615:Sennacherib's Prism 596:Sennacherib's Prism 394:Template:Bibleverse 337:Sennacherib's Prism 73:Albigensian Crusade 1737:arbitration policy 1659: 1588: 1527: 1440:sign your comments 1421:Ray Joseph Cormier 1413: 1403:Ray Joseph Cormier 1283:See above section 866:Ray Joseph Cormier 828:, here's his blog 771:Ray Joseph Cormier 748:Ray Joseph Cormier 644:at the top of the 636:of the following: 623:has been contested 607: 381:New American Bible 1658: 1644: 1612: 1611: 1556:page. Thank you. 1491:I have nominated 1257:were or were not 1124:, rather than as 987:Strange Behaviour 834:that was used on 613:to move the page 249: 248: 1880: 1851: 1775: 1774: 1671: 1670: 1649:is published by 1645: 1616:In this issue... 1579: 1578: 1510: 1488: 642:{{move|NewName}} 390:Template:XYZAFGH 245: 217: 216: 46:Book of the Dead 1888: 1887: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1845: 1804: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1745:the voting page 1711: 1668: 1665: 1660: 1642: 1623:From the Editor 1597: 1576: 1520: 1508: 1489: 1482: 1406: 1357: 1334: 1332:Deletion review 1303: 1200: 989: 969: 809: 751: 716: 697: 600: 427:tributary state 333: 288:deletion policy 284: 227: 212: 187: 107: 75: 41: 12: 11: 5: 1886: 1884: 1858:for discussion 1844: 1838: 1832: 1770: 1769: 1767: 1762:Nomination of 1760: 1714: 1710: 1705: 1664: 1661: 1653: 1643: 1641: 1640: 1635: 1630: 1625: 1618: 1613: 1610: 1609: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1595: 1593: 1590: 1589: 1577: 1575: 1574:: January 2012 1569: 1519: 1516: 1483: 1481: 1477:nomination of 1472: 1405: 1401:nomination of 1396: 1395: 1394: 1365: 1363: 1356: 1353: 1333: 1330: 1302: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1278: 1277: 1230:You added the 1228: 1227: 1212: 1199: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1096:Samuel (Bible) 1092:Samuel (bible) 1088:Samuel (Bible) 1060: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 988: 985: 968: 965: 964: 963: 962: 961: 944: 943: 942: 941: 940: 939: 938: 937: 922: 915: 914: 881: 880: 858:, and another 823:Asa Winstanley 818: 817: 806: 790: 789: 769:notable about 750: 745: 718:Good work :) 715: 712: 696: 691: 672: 671: 660: 649: 599: 592: 591: 590: 589: 588: 556: 537: 536: 535: 534: 526: 525: 524: 521: 518: 515: 503: 502: 501: 500: 474: 473: 472: 471: 444: 443: 442: 441: 398: 397: 372: 371: 370: 369: 332: 329: 327: 283: 278: 247: 246: 239: 220: 211: 206: 186: 181: 180: 179: 178: 177: 106: 103: 74: 71: 40: 35: 31: 30: 25: 20: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1885: 1876: 1875: 1871: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1855: 1850: 1843: 1839: 1837: 1836: 1831: 1830: 1826: 1824: 1822: 1818: 1816: 1812: 1810: 1803: 1799: 1796: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1781: 1765: 1761: 1759: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1709: 1706: 1704: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1678:John of Avila 1675: 1662: 1657: 1652: 1648: 1639: 1636: 1634: 1631: 1629: 1626: 1624: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1617: 1608: 1605: 1604: 1599: 1592: 1591: 1585: 1581: 1580: 1573: 1570: 1568: 1567: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1550: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1532: 1524: 1517: 1515: 1514: 1511: 1504: 1502: 1498: 1494: 1487: 1480: 1476: 1473: 1471: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1448: 1443: 1441: 1437: 1432: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1410: 1404: 1400: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1361: 1354: 1352: 1351: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1331: 1329: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1300: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1267:Clinkophonist 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1217:Clinkophonist 1213: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1205: 1197: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1178: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1160:Clinkophonist 1155: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1145:Clinkophonist 1140: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1130:Clinkophonist 1127: 1123: 1118: 1115: 1114:raison d'être 1110: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1100:Clinkophonist 1097: 1093: 1089: 1084: 1080: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1066: 1065: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1048: 1044: 1037: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1027: 1023: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1008: 999: 998: 997: 996: 995: 993: 986: 984: 983: 979: 975: 966: 960: 956: 952: 948: 947: 946: 945: 936: 932: 928: 927:Clinkophonist 923: 919: 918: 917: 916: 913: 909: 905: 900: 899: 898: 897: 896: 895: 894: 893: 889: 885: 879: 875: 871: 870:Clinkophonist 867: 863: 860: 857: 854: 851: 848: 844: 841: 837: 833: 830: 827: 824: 820: 819: 814: 813: 812: 805: 802: 799: 795: 794: 788: 784: 780: 779:Clinkophonist 776: 772: 768: 764: 760: 759: 758: 756: 749: 746: 744: 743: 739: 735: 734:Clinkophonist 730: 729: 725: 721: 713: 711: 710: 706: 702: 695: 692: 690: 689: 685: 681: 677: 669: 665: 661: 658: 654: 650: 647: 643: 639: 638: 637: 635: 630: 628: 624: 620: 616: 612: 604: 597: 587: 583: 579: 575: 570: 569: 568: 564: 560: 559:Clinkophonist 557: 553: 552: 551: 550: 546: 542: 531: 530: 527: 522: 519: 516: 513: 512: 509: 508: 507: 497: 496: 493: 483: 482: 481: 479: 469: 465: 464: 461: 460: 459: 456: 454: 453:2 Kings 18:13 450: 438: 434: 431: 430: 428: 424: 420: 417: 416: 415: 411: 408: 404: 395: 391: 386: 385: 384: 382: 378: 366: 362: 361: 358: 354: 350: 347: 343: 342: 341: 338: 328: 325: 324: 320: 316: 315:Clinkophonist 312: 306: 305: 301: 297: 293: 289: 282: 279: 277: 276: 272: 268: 267:Clinkophonist 263: 262: 258: 254: 244: 240: 238: 236: 232: 226: 225: 219: 218: 215: 210: 207: 205: 204: 200: 196: 192: 185: 182: 176: 172: 168: 167:Clinkophonist 164: 163: 162: 158: 154: 150: 146: 141: 140: 139: 138: 134: 130: 129:Clinkophonist 127: 126:Template:Cent 122: 121: 117: 113: 105:Bible project 104: 102: 101: 97: 93: 92:Clinkophonist 88: 87: 84: 80: 79:LuciferMorgan 72: 70: 69: 65: 61: 60:Clinkophonist 56: 55: 52: 47: 39: 36: 34: 29: 26: 24: 21: 19: 16: 15: 1846: 1828: 1820: 1814: 1808: 1805: 1800: 1792: 1778: 1766:for deletion 1712: 1666: 1646: 1615: 1614: 1607:January 2012 1606: 1594: 1571: 1547: 1529: 1528: 1505: 1490: 1453:Please note: 1452: 1451: 1444: 1433: 1414: 1382:Interesting. 1358: 1355:Gobleki Tepe 1335: 1319:SPCUClerkbot 1304: 1229: 1204:Göbekli Tepe 1201: 1156: 1141: 1125: 1121: 1119: 1111: 1085: 1081: 1067: 1061: 1045: 1042: 1025: 1020: 1005: 990: 974:LightSpectra 970: 921:perspective. 882: 839: 810: 803: 800: 796: 791: 766: 752: 731: 717: 698: 673: 663: 656: 641: 633: 631: 622: 618: 608: 538: 504: 491: 477: 475: 467: 457: 448: 445: 436: 432: 422: 418: 412: 399: 373: 364: 356: 345: 334: 326: 310: 307: 296:Shirahadasha 285: 264: 250: 234: 230: 228: 221: 213: 195:Shirahadasha 188: 123: 108: 89: 76: 58:About what? 57: 42: 32: 1694:Jayarathina 1384:Sweetmoose6 1311:code letter 1285:Sweetmoose6 1240:Sweetmoose6 1182:Sweetmoose6 1070:Sweetmoose6 816:preserves". 804:References 578:Ecthelion83 541:Ecthelion83 421:= annexed. 253:Tinucherian 153:John Carter 112:John Carter 51:Thomasmeeks 1733:topic bans 1461:Erwin85Bot 1369:dougweller 1315:checkusers 1263:Neutrality 951:DoDaCanaDa 904:DoDaCanaDa 884:DoDaCanaDa 821:Lets take 701:DoDaCanaDa 619:incomplete 598:incomplete 403:Zerubbabel 346:end result 335:1) On the 294:. Best, -- 193:. Best, -- 1729:site bans 1259:heterodox 634:all three 407:Shealtiel 28:/Archive3 23:/Archive2 18:/Archive1 1780:Alatrism 1764:Alatrism 1656:Newsroom 1544:renaming 1536:deletion 1497:deletion 1417:deletion 1255:gnostics 767:anything 732:Thanks. 574:juvenile 1866:Veverve 1789:deleted 1647:Ichthus 1572:Ichthus 1552:on the 1540:merging 1236:gnostic 1719:. The 1598:CHTHUS 1342:Stifle 1211:AD/BC. 680:JPG-GR 662:Added 640:Added 478:before 365:didn't 311:within 1558:Svick 1542:, or 1427:and " 449:every 1870:talk 1753:talk 1698:talk 1680:and 1562:talk 1509:Brad 1465:talk 1431:"). 1388:talk 1373:talk 1346:talk 1323:talk 1289:talk 1271:talk 1244:talk 1221:talk 1186:talk 1164:talk 1149:talk 1134:talk 1104:talk 1074:talk 978:talk 955:talk 931:talk 908:talk 888:talk 874:talk 783:talk 763:Cana 755:Cana 738:talk 724:talk 720:PiCo 705:talk 694:Cana 684:talk 668:here 582:talk 563:talk 545:talk 433:That 405:and 319:talk 300:talk 271:talk 257:talk 199:talk 171:talk 157:talk 133:talk 116:talk 96:talk 64:talk 1823:ion 1713:Hi, 1457:bot 1399:AfD 1086:1. 840:CNN 836:CNN 621:or 485:--> 468:was 357:had 83:Jel 1872:) 1833:⟩ 1829:?? 1817:ec 1811:ur 1806:— 1791:. 1755:) 1731:, 1700:) 1692:-- 1564:) 1538:, 1467:) 1390:) 1375:) 1348:) 1325:) 1291:) 1273:) 1246:) 1223:) 1188:) 1166:) 1151:) 1136:) 1106:) 1076:) 980:) 957:) 933:) 910:) 890:) 876:) 785:) 773:. 740:) 726:) 707:) 686:) 584:) 565:) 547:) 321:) 302:) 273:) 259:) 231:WP 201:) 173:) 159:) 135:) 118:) 98:) 66:) 1868:( 1825:⟨ 1821:t 1815:j 1809:s 1751:( 1696:( 1596:I 1560:( 1463:( 1386:( 1371:( 1344:( 1321:( 1287:( 1269:( 1265:. 1242:( 1219:( 1184:( 1162:( 1147:( 1132:( 1102:( 1072:( 976:( 953:( 929:( 906:( 886:( 872:( 781:( 736:( 722:( 703:( 682:( 670:. 580:( 561:( 543:( 492:a 396:. 317:( 298:( 269:( 255:( 235:X 233:: 197:( 169:( 155:( 131:( 114:( 94:( 62:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index