Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/2010/November

Source 📝

2796:, perhaps together with others, only hints at the true issues, relating to 'truth', in this case, the international implications of European (including Russian) civic art in all forms which began with the Renaissance, together with the 'renaissance' (or 'rebirth') in question, which was of course not that of Christianity but of the pre-Christian ancient world, as exemplified in particular by the revival of the concept of 'victory' symbolized by Nike (or within Rome, 'Victoria', in the 19th Cent. the name adopted for a person who became Queen-Empress together with the name of the Emperor Alexander of Russian, in the form of 'Alexandrina', her 'godfather') together with associated architecture such as triumphal arches, and included the introduction in an original form (that is post-Christian conversion to a different section of European civilization) in the increasingly technical Europe, which has now reached the state we are in today. This was I suggest (although no-one else says this so far as I am aware) typifed, after the First World (or 'Great') War within the memorials of the Allies, in response to the Russian revolution by what was both collaboration and specifically agreed differences between in particular the British Empire, France and the United States, the memorials being related therefore both within the countries in question and as between the countries. If you 2806:
otherwise, I am glad to say, as available now on the Internet. My email address is given above so anyone who is interested can let me know (Councillors within the north-east, in particular in Hartlepool and Middlesbrough, and persons working within English Heritage, Historic Scotland or any members of the Committee of Experts under Article 20 of the Granada Convention, to which Committee this text is incidentally copied, who can of course remain anyonymous although I would very much appreciate it if they did not do so, may have a great deal to gain, who knows?). In any event I now have nothing more to say here, other than to repeat, notwithstanding that I have been called idiotic to do so, my extremely sincere appreciation for what was done by the holder (or holders) of this particular Talk Page. Au revoir if you want, in the way specified. Peter Judge.
2756:). WELL DONE WIKIPEDIA will be the ultimate verdict, or so I believe. It remains to be seen. If you want further information I shall be pleased to provide it to you (by email or by post, contact peter.judge laposte.net). Thanks for that which you have so WELL in fact MAGNIFICENTLY done. I find it difficult to explain fully my gratitude but a step will now I can assure you be a contribution in financial terms to Knowledge (XXG) by myself, even if I am afraid it must be rather modest. Au revoir, and good luck to you and Knowledge (XXG). Peter Judge 22 November 2010 1845: 31: 2570:"There he joined a crew later called "The Young Turks", which was a group of Americanized Italians AND JEWS in New York which included mobsters like Frank Costello, Albert "Mad Hatter" Anastasia, Frank Scalice, Settimo Accardi, Gaetano "Tommy" Lucchese, Joe Adonis, Vito Genovese, Meyer Lansky, Benjamin "Bugsy" Siegel and was headed by one of the future's most powerful Mob bosses, Charlie "Lucky" Luciano." 3391:
the flat numbers he posts, and also fails to account for the fact that the bot reduces vandal-fighter workload by half or more. I am open to being corrected, so I am awaiting his response to my above post before restarting. If he does not respond soon, however, I'll allow the bot to continue its work. Anyone else with something to contribute to the thread should do so.
2639:
Cluebot learns what vandalism is by example. If there are several instances in its dataset of this particular middle name being added, then it will learn that it's considered vandalism, and will start reverting it. Note that the Bayesian database (the part that would detect this) currently requires
1048:
Cluebot-NG is a complete rewrite of the original Cluebot, using new code, and completely different algorithms. It is intended as a replacement, but is currently in a trial period. While it's in a trial period, both Cluebot-NG and the old Cluebot are running, but as SnoFox said, Cluebot NG is faster
913:
Theses focus on theoretics. Cluebot-NG is designed to be practical. This is one major thing that sets Cluebot-NG apart from previous attempts at machine-learning vandalism detection on Knowledge (XXG). It could be adapted to remove some of the aspects that were added for practicality, but our time
704:
Thank your for reporting the false positive. The bot normally detects vandalism reversions by other users using the edit summary. I'll look into detecting it by other means. The edit summary must be terse because its length is limited. "BRFA" is Bot Request For Approval - Cluebot NG is in a trial
3104:
I have written most of the existing section "Etymology" in the article.I tried to make some abbreviations -clean up without changing the meaning,because I understand that many details can confuse a reader.I have tried in the past to improve the article,but it was rejected too, so I cannot improve my
2186:
However the IP making the edit has only edited Knowledge (XXG) once before and in this case I suspect that they weren't trying to vandalise the article, I think they were trying to add in a hidden comment but just didn't know what they were doing. I really do think it was a good faith edit, however
529:
the nation which is will defile will decrease truth did not know like this severely from the English cultural area. To pay attention, nine ' ' ' Head ' of successive Argentina; ' ' , The chief of state defilement characteristic subject which is wishes two time does not use again drinking. mote|Cis
3390:
I am leaving the bot paused for a day or so, pending a response from Stepheng3 to my last post in the above thread, discussing this issue. As stated there, most people are fine with a small fraction of a percent of edits being reverted as false positives - Stepheng3 fails to include perspective in
2791:
Thank you for suggesting that the truth no longer counts in our technical age! Is this what you mean? Human war is surely about a concept of truth, or is not justified at all; war memorials are of course about war, and therefore about truth. What was said by a person on the website dealing, if only
2751:
May I thank you for the immediate and extremely necessary, sensible, competent and (as I personally believe) nationally useful (in fact extremely useful and sensible in all respects including international) immediate removal on 18 November of the remarkably non-substantiated comment provided by the
2219:
The current (first) warning message is already very polite, but there always is a fine line between being strict with the 55% of vandals it catches, and making it easy for the 0.25% of false positives to get around it. If you can come up with a good idea that both makes it easy for users to handle
1436:
The bot actually caught that. It didn't get reverted because the Knowledge (XXG) interface code currently has a rule that ignores edits where the user has more than 50 edits. In this case, the user did have more than 50 edits, but most edits were vandalism. It may be possible to adjust this rule
1360:
The bot actually caught that. It didn't get reverted because the Knowledge (XXG) interface code currently has a rule that ignores edits where the user has more than 50 edits. In this case, the user did have more than 50 edits, but most edits were vandalism. It may be possible to adjust this rule
2921:
We have a lot of IP editors making legitimate edits to the article and getting identified as vandalism by cluebot. I have temporarily excluded cluebot ng from the Deathly hallows page, since a lot of new editors are feeling bitten. I reported one of the erroneous flaggings, but there have been at
2190:
I was going to suggest, if the person has nothing posted on their talk page before, would it be possible for ClueBot to post a welcome template message maybe explaining about vandalism before it starts to warn people? I was thinking a template kind of along the lines of the Welcomelaws template or
1704:
In the current dataset, "bro" is used in a number of vandalism edits, and zero good edits. If this is acceptable, then expanding the dataset with instances of "bro" being constructive would help. Also, "cool" has a 97.6 vandal probability (but since it appears in some good articles, this alone
1511:
It's not currently possible, or necessary. Each edit must be classified by at least two users before it is considered definitely correct. If the two users disagree (one clicks constructive, one clicks vandalism), the edit is skipped. Discarding a few edits (out of tens of thousands) from the
2727:
The review interface does not have a whitelist, it just displays all edits in a random order over the period of a day. Because some bots operate intermittently, bots that were operating that day may be overrepresented. We should pick random edits from a wider timespan, of maybe a few months.
2805:
to which the UK is a signatory, and therefore not be perhaps at least in this sense such a 'waste of time') that we do something rather unique perhaps, and talk about it together, but confidentially, and free of any charge if not more than three people join in, and not particularly expensive
2377:
I noticed cluebot had removed some vandalism to the Haydock article. Since then, it has been vandalised again by a user named Olliepee. It seems they opened that user name specifically to vandalise the Haydock article. Anyway, I've reverted it back to the version last edited by myself
2752:
person or persons as named under 'User talk' address above, and also for your explanation and suggestions on this same talk page. You may be interested to know (if any of you should have the time or the interest) that I myself have added a further comment to the talk page in question (
101:
seems just to have started up (but not having reset its reference counter?). So far, so good, but the user page says: "Selecting a threshold to hold false positives at a minimal rate of 0.25%, the bot catches approximately 63% of all vandalism." Shouldn't that be 'maximal'?
2435:
You have reverted some edits I have made. I was the original author of the article in question and have requested its removal by Knowledge (XXG) as in hindsight Knowledge (XXG) is the wrong forum for it. Please could you let me know how I go about getting it removed. Thanks
2246:
be that we would get less vandals then if they get either the Welcome Laws template or the Welcome Anon Vandal template as a message from ClueBot especially if they're new to editing because both those templates explain a lot about vandalism. Hope that makes sense!
2792:
by implication, with these matters, was that it was telling lies. The revert was essential for any number of reasons including as pointed out by myself the general philosophical concept of truth. In connection with this, the Knowledge (XXG) article in question,
1424:. It is very obviously vandalism, and I'm sure all of the Cluebots would be able to determine it is vandalism with a very high certainty, but for some reason this edit stayed up for 3 hours. Why is it that vandalism like this sometimes still gets missed? 1348:. It is very obviously vandalism, and I'm sure all of the Cluebots would be able to determine it is vandalism with a very high certainty, but for some reason this edit stayed up for 3 hours. Why is it that vandalism like this sometimes still gets missed? 2832:
Maybe if quoted words are not counted, it can have less false positives, as false positives can result from quoting something that appears un-orderly. This will not allow people to use quotes to hide vandalism, as edits with only quotes can still be
2619:
article (and others, I'd imagine) is a regular target for a certain kind of fancruft. Vandals will continually try inserting a fictional, unverified middle name. A registered user was recently blocked for this, and now an IP or two is at it again.
211:
I am seeing Cluebot adding a header for the current month after one already exists. Is that something that can be fixed or just something we have to live with? (This got archived even though I posted it less than a week ago, so I am reposting.)
2623:
Is there a way to create a bot that could detect and revert something like this (like whenever the word is inserted into the article)? Or could something like ClueBot be adjusted to do it? Just thought I'd see if something could be done. --
2871:
and see if there would be anyway of making cluebot realise it was reverting to an already vandalised version? I would think this should be fairly obvious, as it was reverting to a 44 byte version when the page used to be 16 kbytes. Cheers
2899:'s page I don't know! I would leave you a gift of some sort but the message above says you can't accept gifts, so please accept my most grateful thanks instead. You really are doing the best job at the moment reverting vandalism -- 386:
I'd like to know what filter the edit hit (one of the "making a minor change with obscenities" filters, but which regex?) as well as to check that similar edits will be allowed in the future. The Mathematics WikiProject adds many
1579:
The original ClueBot will stop editing in mainspace when ClueBot NG is approved. It will likely still run in template space and the optin list for a while - or until ClueBot NG learns enough to operate in those namespaces. --
705:
period, and has not been approved as a full bot yet. This is the reason the edit summary links to the BRFA (so false positives can be reported there so reviewers can see), and also the reason it does not yet have a bot flag.
817:
about this issue, and if the community agrees, we will change the edit summary. You should start the discussion before the end of the trial period, so the BAG has a chance to reject the bot on the grounds of being too nice.
3266:
My edit was right... The first version said that the album would come out on 7th December, but that's wrong because albums usually come out on Fridays. So I change it back to my edit (which was right, 4th February 2011)
1615:
Cluebot-NG is not just an upgrade of the original Cluebot. Its mechanism is entirely different, and incompatible, with the original. Cluebot-NG will eventually learn how to properly classify edits in other namespaces.
356:. I've removed everything from the optin list, for now. Keep in mind, when users add pages there, they are inviting the bot somewhere where it has not been tested or designed for. It may work well. It may not. -- 2327:
I think there's a whitelist, though. There may be editors that ClueBot is set to completely ignore, which would only in extremely exceptional circumstances include IP addresses (mostly it would be registered users).
750:
is a link to the block page. Admins can click block at the top of the page just as easily as click that big red button. The button also confuses normal users when they click it and get sent to a permission denied
382:
and I attempted to report it at the standard place. Unfortunately, when given revert ID 610876 it didn't pull up the data from the edit (and said it had not been reverted, but I trust this is some sort of default).
1170:
Update: A couple additional edits have been done on that page and that extra first line has now disappeared, even from the particular revision created by ClueBot for which I provided the link above. Very odd.
337:
Cluebot-NG was not trained on data outside of the main namespace, and is not designed to analyze data outside of it. The Knowledge (XXG) interface is being changed to ignore edits outside of the main namespace.
2800:
or indeed anyone else is interested in discussing these matters further then I suggest (and will be very pleased if you think that after all it would be in the public interest of the Council of Europe under the
1862: 2414:
Sometimes things like this happen, but they can be fixed. False positives should be reported on the BRFA using the format specified there. Any other discussion is also occurring there for the moment.
1305:
Note: This comment and the proceeding one are written by a user who has a long history of vandalism. All of the edits from this user that Cluebot-NG has reverted are clear, obvious vandalism.
1283:
I don't see what's wrong with this filter bot other than that it reverts constructive edits to pages on Wikepedia, and starts spamming messages to users attempting to revert vandalised edits.
2064:
I can only assume it's down to the length of time that's lapsed between the warnings. Looking at the ones you've mentioned there, there is a good few days between the warnings. If you look at
744:
During trials, edit summaries typically link to the discussion about the bot pending approval. BRFA was linked there because I wanted people to go there to make comments/questions/complaints.
1589:
Pardon my ignorance, but wouldn't it be possible to copy that part of the code onto ClueBot NG's code and then modify it as needed or is that more work than it's made out to be? Regards, —
546: 1777: 1651: 1610: 3062: 814: 810: 188: 1782: 2068:
you will see all warnings are on the same date and ClueBot only created one heading despite warning the IP more than once. I'm sure if I'm wrong I'll be corrected! --
1787: 2502:
was vandalism. You are very clever. Your programmer must be very smart and talented, and also quite attractive to his or her preferred gender or genders. Hurrah! -
1792: 1690:
It is OK to propose an article for deletion, even if you do not have an account. It's probably the words "cool story bro." that caused the bot to revert your edit.
1035:
Both ClueBots are running; however, ClueBot NG appears to be faster and catches more vandalism than the original ClueBot, drowning out old-ClueBot edits. Here's a
727:. I expect just one link to the bot-talk-page (with a STOP button there!). Again: I understand your testing state, but for me the es should be part of the test. - 445:
This link is a remnant from the old Cluebot. It will become operational again when the new bot does. False positives are currently being reported on the BRFA.
2777:
Uhhh, what? All it did was delete some random sentence and you wasted a long time typing the above, which doesn't even explain why the revert was so important.
3147:
I will revert your edit. That guy just wanted to make thath article more interesting. I think we must let him to do his job till the end, he has just started.
1774:
Anti-vandal bots are typically not allowed to mark their edits with the bot flag. A quick search of the archives shows more resources and further responses:
2470:
to the page, but it's not entirely clear that you are the only author, so an administrator may not actually delete it. Other than that you'd have to start a
1802: 1797: 3179:
I'am from Latin America, and while watching TV I saw a commerial about the next episode of The Walking Dead, (revealing what I out on the episodes section.
813:. Before changing the edit summary, the community should discuss reasons why politeness in an edit summary is a problem. Please start a discussion on the 565: 542: 505: 485: 2915: 284:
Thanks. The page is well watched, and rarely (almost never) vandalised. Problems on the page are more usually due to editors violating other WP guidelines.
1705:
wouldn't trigger it). "cool" would also be outweighed by "story", which has a 21% vandal probability, and "sources" which has a 25% vandal probability.
1573: 2979:, but there was no confirmation that my report was received. I tried several times, using different browsers. Is the False Positives page broken? -- 2204:
If it is and you need a template to be written, I would be happy to assist with this as I'm part of the Welcoming Committee on Knowledge (XXG) :) --
578:
ClueBot only reverted your edit because a page does not exist. It does not know anything specific about topics except for what it knows to reject.
2922:
least 5 more bad reversions in the past day by cluebot, and not one of which has been actual vandalism. Could you please look into this issue?
1017:, but after my short break of a week or so, Cluebot NG is now the only bot that I see reverting. Is it a replacement or a new version of Cluebot? 2198:
I didn't report it as a false positive because although I don't think the edit was vandalism I can see why ClueBot may have reverted it as this.
1961:
Where did you find this link? It's not currently functioning - all the references we know of to this link have been changed. Did we miss one?
1625: 1584: 1476:
The bot uses a completely different mechanism than all previous antivandal bots. This new mechanism allows it to catch things such as this.
1400:
The bot uses a completely different mechanism than all previous antivandal bots. This new mechanism allows it to catch things such as this.
623: 2834: 2778: 2580: 1164: 978:
frequently get this error message when classifying edits using the review interface, even more so than other error messages I was getting.
425:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Knowledge (XXG):Reference_desk/Science&action=historysubmit&diff=394563020&oldid=39456300
2640:
4 instances of a word to contribute to the score, so at least 4 instances of the middle name being added and reverted would be required.
1878:. I finally realized that I didn't like these. They were without an explanation, by an unregistered IP, and had removed links. It wasn't 3268: 3229: 3201: 3106: 2381: 2270: 1882:
clear, because material was apparently added as well. Finally I reverted it, only to find that the bot had already done so! Incredible!
1290: 1264: 1124: 932:
That makes sense. On second thought, it would probably be more suitable for a regular research paper rather than a M.S./Ph.D. thesis. --
267: 244: 2933: 2813: 2763: 2400: 2017: 1675: 409: 2220:
the very few false positives, and makes it difficult for vandals to get around the bot and simply revandalize, I'd love to hear it.
3320: 2512: 2339: 862: 589: 148: 1155:, that line is still displayed even though it's not there if you click the edit tab. Do you or someone else know what's going on? 2443: 3073: 3066: 2939: 2712:
adding metadata and the like. I imagine you have a whitelist with other bots on it but you seems to have missed this one:-)--
2459: 2293:
I'm not aware of ClueBot or ClueBot NG having a 'blacklist' as such, though if I'm wrong I'm sure someone will correct me. --
747: 3022:
Why hasn't this been fixed? Why is the bot allowed to continue operating when there's no way to report false positives? --
2686:
Or are you saying that it's an automatic process that may take effect eventually? In any case, thanks for your response. --
2595:
This was a false positive, likely because the only thing that was added was "jews", and this is usually found in vandalism.
2082:
Well it would be nice if the Bot followed convention rather creating duplicate headings after a certain number of days...--
1496:
Is it necessary to somehow correct a classification if I have, by chance, clicked the wrong button? If so, how do I do it?
3008:
Hi Stephen, if you look at the first post on the page it seems a few users are having trouble reporting false positives --
2151: 2116: 1891: 792: 774: 2039:
Why is the bot adding month headings when warning on talk pages, when the relevant month heading is already present? e.g
2793: 3076:. That points to cobihome.external.cluenet.org, so it seems that the problem (whatever it was) has been dealt with.-- 2101:
IMHO it does not make sense to add a welcome message after a final warning has already been issued in the same month (
1980: 1875: 178: 3283: 1024: 38: 3013: 2904: 2717: 2298: 2252: 2209: 2129: 2073: 328: 47: 17: 607:
Does what it says on the tin really: You just get an error page if you click the link given for editing stats.
2838: 2797: 2782: 2584: 2102: 2089: 2054: 1735: 1538: 1197: 619: 137:
For people that are sensitive to war, at least the avatar for ClueBot NG doesn't show any falling bombs in it.
107: 3400: 3385: 3370: 3325: 3295: 3276: 3256: 3237: 3209: 3156: 3133: 3114: 3085: 3044: 3031: 3017: 3003: 2988: 2965: 2943: 2908: 2881: 2857: 2842: 2821: 2786: 2771: 2737: 2721: 2695: 2649: 2633: 2604: 2588: 2555: 2534: 2517: 2487: 2451: 2424: 2408: 2389: 2366: 2344: 2318: 2302: 2278: 2256: 2229: 2213: 2154: 2133: 2124:
I've actually found out now from Crispy that it's a glitch with ClueBot NG. Hopefully will be fixed soon :) --
2119: 2093: 2077: 2058: 2025: 1992: 1970: 1955: 1858: 1832: 1768: 1742: 1714: 1699: 1683: 1542: 1521: 1505: 1485: 1470: 1446: 1430: 1409: 1394: 1370: 1354: 1331: 1314: 1298: 1272: 1246: 1229: 1201: 1180: 1132: 1098: 1083: 1058: 1043: 1029: 1002: 987: 959: 941: 923: 907: 883: 866: 827: 804: 784: 736: 714: 699: 684: 644: 627: 594: 569: 509: 489: 454: 436: 414: 360: 347: 332: 314: 293: 279: 256: 223: 200: 181: 153: 126: 111: 87: 77: 2573:
look, there's a few men of Jewish Mafia in the list, not only Italians, where do you see a vandalism here?!
1643: 1602: 1565: 3272: 3233: 3205: 3110: 2817: 2767: 2385: 2274: 1294: 1268: 1222: 1128: 3197: 2809: 2759: 2576: 2439: 2013: 1671: 1286: 1260: 1120: 850: 611: 534: 2927: 2404: 2021: 1679: 1322:
If you don't like Cluebot-NG reverting your edits, don't post angry messages here. Just don't vandalize.
615: 405: 2544: 2447: 1089:
This is simple easy-to-catch vandalism. The bot is capable of catching much harder vandalism than this.
3315: 3290: 2963: 2530: 2508: 2334: 1437:
to that it only applies when fewer than 10% of the user's past edits have been vandalism, or something.
1361:
to that it only applies when fewer than 10% of the user's past edits have been vandalism, or something.
1018: 858: 584: 143: 3105:
own section because it can be considered "vandalism".Does the section "Etymology" need clean-up or not?
2192: 2003:
Having the same issue. Perhaps you can post here a link to a correct reporting page for false reports?
690:
re-reading my thing, I apologise for the rude text. Can you find the questions, or should I rephrase? -
3396: 3009: 2900: 2853: 2753: 2745: 2733: 2713: 2645: 2600: 2420: 2314: 2294: 2248: 2225: 2205: 2125: 2069: 1966: 1710: 1621: 1517: 1481: 1442: 1405: 1366: 1327: 1310: 1094: 1054: 955: 919: 895: 879: 823: 710: 640: 450: 343: 324: 196: 122: 73: 3037: 3381: 3081: 3027: 2999: 2984: 2540: 2465: 2284:
If you're meaning have you been reported for vandalism then the answer at the minute is no because
2083: 2048: 1728: 1552:
Will ClueBot NG replace ClueBot any time in the near future or will the work cohesively? Regards, —
1534: 1466: 1390: 1242: 1193: 432: 289: 275: 252: 218: 103: 3376:
100 false positives (i.e. bitten/alienated users) per day is acceptable, go ahead and revert me.--
2994:
I find it hard to believe I'm the only person encountering this problem. Is anybody listening? --
2848:
The bot already handles quoted words differently. They do not contribute to the Bayesian scores.
3252: 3152: 2896: 1887: 1764: 1633: 1592: 1555: 1216: 561: 538: 501: 481: 307: 1109:
I can understand why removing a section is suspicious. But it should be stopped by abuse filter
172: 2309:
There is no blacklist. Having a blacklist would cause a very large number of false positives.
3362: 3183: 3058: 2923: 2877: 2691: 2629: 2483: 2146: 2111: 1851: 1844: 1428: 1420:
This is not meant as criticism, it is just a question. Sometimes I come across vandalism like
1352: 1344:
This is not meant as criticism, it is just a question. Sometimes I come across vandalism like
1176: 1160: 1079: 400: 2802: 3310: 3285: 3129: 2958: 2709: 2526: 2503: 2362: 2329: 1691: 1497: 1148: 994: 979: 937: 903: 854: 800: 732: 695: 680: 579: 138: 3036:
Stepheng3: Where have you found this link? I believe the new error reporting page is found
2471: 2285: 1901:
I'm trying to report cluebot sequence number 34998 as a false positive (which I reverted).
763: 723:
be). I sensed a bot, but that is not the issue. I suggest (again): please take care of the
167:
yet a full bot, in that it still shows on my watchlist despite my setting the watchlist to
3392: 3366: 3306: 3050: 2849: 2729: 2641: 2596: 2416: 2310: 2221: 1988: 1962: 1951: 1810: 1706: 1617: 1513: 1477: 1438: 1401: 1362: 1323: 1306: 1090: 1050: 951: 915: 875: 819: 706: 636: 446: 391: 339: 192: 175: 118: 98: 69: 3069:
but probably wasn't, since I see that the latter page was only created on November 21st.
3377: 3354: 3347: 3337: 3140: 3077: 3023: 2995: 2980: 2242:
does which is post a welcome message and post a friendly warning at the same time. It
1462: 1386: 1238: 428: 285: 271: 248: 213: 2475: 1049:
and catches more vandalism than the original Cluebot, so these are the edits you see.
3248: 3148: 2616: 2615:
Hi. Don't know if this is in the right place, but I thought I'd try asking here. The
2239: 2180: 1883: 1760: 1074:. The change was most definiteley vandalism. Let me know if you have any questions. 791:
You skipped my q: do not say "Thanks" by bot. Disgusting habit; US? Don't copy what "
302: 3358: 2873: 2687: 2625: 2479: 2141: 2106: 1425: 1349: 1172: 1156: 1075: 1014: 522: 2357:
ClueBot hasn't made any edits since November 10th. Has it been retired already? --
2008: 3189: 719:
Thank you for reply. Still, I think the es (edit summary) should be better (not:
3125: 3041: 2548: 2358: 1040: 933: 899: 796: 728: 691: 676: 46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2708:
In working with the review interface I've been asked about at least 4 edits by
2195:
currently uses. That might be of use to the person especially if they're new.
2004: 1798:
User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/2008/July#Missing bot flag in edit summaries
1036: 846:
I undid your edit to the page on pet rabbits because what i'm saying is true.
3182:
If you want references, and PROBE he's a video of the ORIGINAL "TV" online of
2040: 1984: 1947: 68:
that Cluebot NG gives out at the moment, does not seem to display properly. --
2976: 2525:
Robot can not except cookies or other such gifts, but its master thanks you--
1904: 2552: 2065: 2044: 1829: 1581: 781: 526: 473: 357: 84: 3247:
Hi. CuriousColonal = Vandalism (Origin theories of Christopher Columbus) --
3049:
I originally got there by way of the wikilink in the edit summary that
1778:
User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/2007/August#If you're a bot, say so!
635:
Where is this link? Is it on the Cluebot-NG page or old Cluebot page?
773:
As for the edit summary, other than the BRFA link, it is exactly what
947: 2474:
about the article, but having a quick look, it looks as if it is a
1822:
User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/2010/November#Bot Classification
521:
in army prerogative of supreme command person of a country ' ' '
914:
is better spent improving it so it can improve Knowledge (XXG).
652: 3124:
Hi. Is the source code available under a free license? Thanks.
3173: 671:-- uh, I do not want a bot to say 'Thanks'. Just link to the ' 25: 2378:(92.239.71.235) as you (or cluebot) did on the 6th November. 3176:
transmits internationally the TV series: "The Walking Dead"
2891:
ClueBot NG, you never cease to amaze me. How you picked up
1946:
There's no submit button & no info on the change loaded.
1865:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
1843: 1803:
User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/2009/July#Bot shows on RC
894:
I think ClueBot NG would make a great Ph.D. thesis topic in
675:, ok? And, operator, your bot did not set the "b" switch. - 2238:
What I was thinking was something along the lines of what
516:
Korean languages and listen and the cotton bond interpret.
3169:
I just wanted to tell why did I put the "short summary".
1788:
User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/2007/November#Bot flag
1492:
Correcting classification in the ClueBot Review Interface
1211:
Yeah, I have a stupid question. What's the NG stand for?
187:
It is in a trial period. Discussion can be found on the
1817:
User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/2010/November#re Watt
809:
Discussion about the bot's behavior is occurring on the
397:
templates and I wouldn't want to fight ClueBot's edits.
3331: 3054: 2954: 2892: 2869: 2674: 2670: 2666: 2662: 2658: 2499: 2399:
You are only reverting back to the original vandalism.
2176: 1793:
User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/2008/January#Bot tag
1783:
User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/2007/September#Flag?
1757: 1532: 1461:
ever since Inception came out. Neat trick there, bot.
1458: 1421: 1385:
ever since Inception came out. Neat trick there, bot.
1382: 1345: 1235: 1191: 1152: 1144: 1072: 659: 424: 380: 353: 320: 299: 263: 239: 237: 235: 233: 65: 3063:
Knowledge (XXG):Bots/Requests for approval/ClueBot NG
2458:
If you're talking about the article currently called
1752:
I see not all edits by this bot are flagged with the
1416:
Why does very obvious vandalism sometimes get missed?
1340:
Why does very obvious vandalism sometimes get missed?
1105:
Clarification of my abuse report about stupid cluebot
301:, doesn't appear the the bot is completely blocked -- 530:mote]] ( mote|talk]]) 14:09, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 2009:
http://en.wikipedia.org/User:ClueBot/FalsePositives
3072:Trying to recreate the process just now, I got to 1850:Hello, ClueBot Commons. You have new messages at 874:Your edits on this page are considered vandalism. 2005:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:ClueBot_Commons 754:Anti-vandalism bots have typically never set the 3224:. It just needed a little more info. Some pages 525:' ' ' Writes the expression which is and hangs… 1117:both. So do some joined up thinking please :) 667:BRFA? Is your bot user's page, not mine. Then, 558:List of Presidents of USA → List of Head of USA 3190:http://mundofox.com/la/videos/the-walking-dead 1983:. I'm pretty sure that's the link I followed. 1213:The nerd in me is hoping for "Next Generation" 1809:And these for discussions specifically about 1727:When is the first ClueBot coming back again? 8: 3228:a little more info. It's what makes it fun. 1071:I am endorsing the work that ClueBot did at 1013:Most of the reverts previously were made by 2971:the error reporting page seems to be broken 2916:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (film) 427:gives the wrong user and the wrong article. 423:same problem above eg ID8834 for this edit 3065:. Somehow I got to a page that resembled 2977:http://delta.cluenet.org/~cobi/cluebot.php 2201:However would my suggestion be possible? 1905:http://delta.cluenet.org/~cobi/cluebot.php 1138: 1457:The WP:FILM peeps have been dealing with 1381:The WP:FILM peeps have been dealing with 2864:Reverting to already vandalised versions 2498:I can't imagine how you recognized that 1664:are anons not allowed to post subst:prod 950:, but it's not a formal research paper. 2460:criticisms of age regulations in sports 1821: 664:"Questions, comments, complaints -: --> 476:라는 국가를 이렇게 심하게 모독할 줄은 정말 몰랐습니다. 주의하시구요 2191:the Welcome-Anon-Vandal template that 2105:) by the same silicon-based lifeform. 1938:"ClueBot didn't catch some vandalism." 268:Knowledge (XXG):Reference desk/Science 245:Knowledge (XXG):Reference desk/Science 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 480:라는 국가원수모독성 제목은 두 번 다시 사용하지 마시기 바랍니다. 7: 3375:I paused the bot. If you think : --> 2478:topic so is unlikely to be deleted. 1139:ClueBot's revert didn't seem to take 993:Now I don't seem to get it anymore. 2975:I entered the revert id (46513) at 1759:This gets annoying on watch lists. 560:, When is like this, cheerfulness? 375:"Report false positive" not working 1897:Unable to report a false positive. 1630:Ok thanks for the clarification. — 662:. The edit summary was illegible. 60:Warning seems to be malfunctioning 24: 229:Cluebot -too many false positives 2187:ClueBot marked it as vandalism. 748:That big, red, tacky stop button 29: 1940:"ClueBot reverted a good edit." 1928:Why are you making this report? 3074:User:ClueBot NG/FalsePositives 3067:User:ClueBot NG/FalsePositives 758:flag in edits. Approved bots 379:ClueBot made this bad revert: 1: 3401:05:57, 28 November 2010 (UTC) 3386:05:20, 28 November 2010 (UTC) 3371:02:29, 28 November 2010 (UTC) 3326:02:24, 28 November 2010 (UTC) 3296:19:01, 27 November 2010 (UTC) 3277:17:02, 27 November 2010 (UTC) 3257:16:14, 27 November 2010 (UTC) 3238:14:53, 27 November 2010 (UTC) 3210:06:26, 27 November 2010 (UTC) 3157:00:07, 27 November 2010 (UTC) 3134:22:47, 26 November 2010 (UTC) 3115:17:16, 26 November 2010 (UTC) 3086:22:15, 26 November 2010 (UTC) 3045:23:09, 24 November 2010 (UTC) 3032:02:13, 24 November 2010 (UTC) 3018:21:53, 23 November 2010 (UTC) 3004:21:39, 23 November 2010 (UTC) 2989:02:59, 21 November 2010 (UTC) 2966:04:08, 25 November 2010 (UTC) 2944:00:07, 25 November 2010 (UTC) 2914:Excessive False positives on 2909:21:44, 24 November 2010 (UTC) 2882:13:01, 23 November 2010 (UTC) 2858:18:24, 23 November 2010 (UTC) 2843:07:34, 23 November 2010 (UTC) 2822:11:25, 23 November 2010 (UTC) 2787:07:37, 23 November 2010 (UTC) 2772:15:41, 22 November 2010 (UTC) 2738:19:05, 22 November 2010 (UTC) 2722:14:15, 22 November 2010 (UTC) 2696:21:47, 22 November 2010 (UTC) 2650:19:03, 22 November 2010 (UTC) 2634:13:40, 22 November 2010 (UTC) 2605:19:02, 22 November 2010 (UTC) 2589:12:41, 22 November 2010 (UTC) 2566:where do you see a vandalism? 2556:22:29, 24 November 2010 (UTC) 2535:10:01, 22 November 2010 (UTC) 2518:23:00, 21 November 2010 (UTC) 2488:20:40, 23 November 2010 (UTC) 2452:13:04, 21 November 2010 (UTC) 2425:02:40, 21 November 2010 (UTC) 2409:02:33, 21 November 2010 (UTC) 2390:18:22, 20 November 2010 (UTC) 2367:21:08, 19 November 2010 (UTC) 2345:04:40, 24 November 2010 (UTC) 2319:18:26, 19 November 2010 (UTC) 2303:18:13, 19 November 2010 (UTC) 2279:16:57, 19 November 2010 (UTC) 2257:18:44, 19 November 2010 (UTC) 2230:18:29, 19 November 2010 (UTC) 2214:21:13, 18 November 2010 (UTC) 2155:21:54, 21 November 2010 (UTC) 2134:18:05, 21 November 2010 (UTC) 2120:17:35, 21 November 2010 (UTC) 2094:16:06, 19 November 2010 (UTC) 2078:00:25, 19 November 2010 (UTC) 2059:13:50, 16 November 2010 (UTC) 2026:00:52, 19 November 2010 (UTC) 1993:21:50, 18 November 2010 (UTC) 1971:12:14, 16 November 2010 (UTC) 1956:08:32, 16 November 2010 (UTC) 1892:22:17, 15 November 2010 (UTC) 1859:18:41, 15 November 2010 (UTC) 1833:11:32, 15 November 2010 (UTC) 1769:11:17, 15 November 2010 (UTC) 1743:22:13, 14 November 2010 (UTC) 1715:12:59, 12 November 2010 (UTC) 1700:12:21, 12 November 2010 (UTC) 1684:04:40, 12 November 2010 (UTC) 1652:04:58, 14 November 2010 (UTC) 1626:11:49, 10 November 2010 (UTC) 1611:10:59, 10 November 2010 (UTC) 1585:06:46, 10 November 2010 (UTC) 1574:06:40, 10 November 2010 (UTC) 1543:22:09, 10 November 2010 (UTC) 1522:01:04, 10 November 2010 (UTC) 1506:00:47, 10 November 2010 (UTC) 2949:Four second vandalism revert 2794:West Hartlepool War Memorial 2373:Vandalism to Haydock article 1876:List of Maronite Patriarchs‎ 1816: 1486:22:54, 9 November 2010 (UTC) 1471:22:29, 9 November 2010 (UTC) 1447:22:51, 9 November 2010 (UTC) 1431:21:48, 9 November 2010 (UTC) 1410:22:54, 9 November 2010 (UTC) 1395:22:29, 9 November 2010 (UTC) 1371:22:51, 9 November 2010 (UTC) 1355:21:48, 9 November 2010 (UTC) 1332:11:45, 9 November 2010 (UTC) 1315:11:45, 9 November 2010 (UTC) 1299:04:39, 9 November 2010 (UTC) 1273:04:37, 9 November 2010 (UTC) 1247:08:06, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 1230:03:33, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 1202:00:22, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 1181:01:19, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 1165:23:28, 7 November 2010 (UTC) 1133:19:44, 7 November 2010 (UTC) 1099:22:38, 6 November 2010 (UTC) 1084:18:38, 6 November 2010 (UTC) 1059:22:37, 6 November 2010 (UTC) 1044:15:51, 6 November 2010 (UTC) 1030:14:42, 6 November 2010 (UTC) 1003:03:30, 6 November 2010 (UTC) 988:01:22, 6 November 2010 (UTC) 970:Transaction failed to commit 960:08:14, 4 November 2010 (UTC) 942:06:38, 4 November 2010 (UTC) 924:06:18, 4 November 2010 (UTC) 908:06:05, 4 November 2010 (UTC) 884:20:34, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 867:20:26, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 828:06:06, 4 November 2010 (UTC) 805:23:48, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 785:20:41, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 737:19:24, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 715:18:58, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 700:18:50, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 685:18:41, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 645:16:43, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 628:15:50, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 595:14:44, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 570:14:29, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 510:14:30, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 490:14:09, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 455:16:38, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 437:13:21, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 415:12:57, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 361:17:33, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 348:16:36, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 333:16:10, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 323:. Another false positive. -- 315:16:10, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 294:14:16, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 280:13:29, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 257:12:55, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 224:01:29, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 201:22:32, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 182:22:08, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 154:20:28, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 133:I like the new image better. 127:19:10, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 112:19:01, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 88:19:03, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 78:18:58, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 3057:. The wikilink took me to 1981:User:ClueBot/FalsePositives 1874:Three changes were made to 1512:dataset isn't a big issue. 3421: 3222:The Penguins of Madagascar 3220:You didn't have to unedit 2494:ClueBot NG, you dazzle me! 1528:Now I really am impressed! 1257:This is fucking retarded. 890:a little off-topic, but... 2868:Could you take a look at 2353:original ClueBot retired? 2140:THX for the information! 1869: 793:the original ClueBot uses 775:the original ClueBot uses 665:BRFA Thanks, ClueBot NG." 603:Editing stats link broken 319:(after ec) ClueBot NG is 18:User talk:ClueBot Commons 2431:Message From Sportmania7 2269:AM I IN THE BLACKLIST?-- 472:라는 표현을 쓰시다니... 영어 문화권에서 2803:1985 Granada Convention 2547:, though. Robots like 1151:but if you look at the 1145:reverted some vandalism 1143:Oddest thing. ClueBot 974:I have just started to 766:. And unapproved bots 498:역대 미국의 대통령 → 역대 미국의 대갈통 298:Just caught another FP 207:Redundant month headers 3139:Possible vandalism on 3120:ClueBot NG source code 3061:, which redirected to 1848: 1320:Note to other vandals: 3216:An unnecessary unedit 2539:Robot operators like 2462:, then you could add 1934:"Someone vandalized." 1847: 1147:in the first line of 1009:Where did Cluebot go? 352:That page was on the 171:include bot edits. -- 42:of past discussions. 2953:Amazing. Thanks for 2754:User talk:82.1.67.40 2746:User talk:82.1.67.40 896:computer engineering 94:Picky, picky, picky! 3302:Trial over already? 2472:deletion discussion 2288:is sitting empty :) 2066:this IP's talk page 1930:"I made a mistake." 1852:Hybirdd's talk page 764:bot approvals group 463:한국어를 알아들으시면 해석해보세요. 3162:The Walking Dead!! 2897:The Queen Victoria 2086: 2051: 1863:remove this notice 1849: 1668:i didnt know dis 1279:This is a spambot. 1153:resulting revision 1039:I just took. :p - 159:Bot Classification 3200:comment added by 3184:Fox Latin America 3059:User:ClueBot NG/B 2938: 2932: 2812:comment added by 2762:comment added by 2579:comment added by 2442:comment added by 2175:The Bot reverted 2084: 2049: 2016:comment added by 1674:comment added by 1289:comment added by 1263:comment added by 1214: 1123:comment added by 1027: 870: 853:comment added by 842:i undid your edit 741: 631: 614:comment added by 551: 537:comment added by 413: 311: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3412: 3352: 3346: 3342: 3336: 3323: 3318: 3313: 3293: 3288: 3262:Bruno Mars album 3212: 2961: 2936: 2930: 2895:as vandalism on 2824: 2774: 2710:User:RjwilmsiBot 2704:User:RjwilmsiBot 2591: 2516: 2469: 2454: 2342: 2337: 2332: 2149: 2144: 2114: 2109: 2028: 1907:gives me a form: 1866: 1739: 1732: 1686: 1649: 1646: 1639: 1636: 1608: 1605: 1598: 1595: 1571: 1568: 1561: 1558: 1301: 1275: 1228: 1219: 1212: 1149:Medical cannabis 1135: 1026:talk to me here! 1025: 1020:I am a violinist 869: 847: 740:(better sign ?1) 739: 630: 608: 592: 587: 582: 556:You think about 550: 531: 403: 396: 390: 312: 309: 305: 221: 216: 151: 146: 141: 33: 32: 26: 3420: 3419: 3415: 3414: 3413: 3411: 3410: 3409: 3350: 3344: 3340: 3334: 3321: 3316: 3311: 3309:was on a roll! 3304: 3291: 3286: 3264: 3245: 3218: 3195: 3164: 3145: 3122: 3102: 3010:5 albert square 2973: 2959: 2951: 2919: 2901:5 albert square 2889: 2866: 2830: 2828:just suggesting 2807: 2757: 2749: 2714:Fuhghettaboutit 2706: 2613: 2574: 2568: 2506: 2496: 2463: 2437: 2433: 2397: 2375: 2355: 2340: 2335: 2330: 2295:5 albert square 2267: 2249:5 albert square 2206:5 albert square 2173: 2147: 2142: 2126:5 albert square 2112: 2107: 2070:5 albert square 2037: 2011: 1944: 1936:"I vandalized." 1899: 1872: 1867: 1856: 1841: 1750: 1737: 1730: 1725: 1669: 1666: 1644: 1642: 1634: 1631: 1603: 1601: 1593: 1590: 1566: 1564: 1556: 1553: 1550: 1530: 1494: 1455: 1418: 1379: 1342: 1284: 1281: 1258: 1255: 1227: 1217: 1215: 1209: 1207:Stupid Question 1189: 1141: 1118: 1107: 1069: 1011: 972: 892: 848: 844: 656: 616:Sonicdrewdriver 609: 605: 590: 585: 580: 532: 518: 500:, 이러면 기분이 좋나요? 465: 394: 388: 377: 325:Kurt Shaped Box 308: 303: 231: 219: 214: 209: 161: 149: 144: 139: 135: 96: 62: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3418: 3416: 3408: 3407: 3406: 3405: 3404: 3403: 3303: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3263: 3260: 3244: 3241: 3217: 3214: 3163: 3160: 3144: 3141:Ved Buens Ende 3137: 3121: 3118: 3101: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3095: 3094: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3090: 3089: 3088: 3070: 2972: 2969: 2950: 2947: 2918: 2912: 2888: 2885: 2865: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2835:173.183.69.134 2829: 2826: 2779:173.183.69.134 2748: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2705: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2678: 2653: 2652: 2612: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2581:82.145.208.144 2567: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2495: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2432: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2396: 2393: 2374: 2371: 2370: 2354: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2322: 2321: 2306: 2305: 2290: 2289: 2266: 2265:False positive 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2233: 2232: 2172: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2085:Pontificalibus 2050:Pontificalibus 2036: 2035:Month headings 2033: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2029: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1974: 1973: 1943: 1941: 1939: 1937: 1935: 1933: 1931: 1929: 1927: 1926: 1924: 1922: 1920: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1914: 1912: 1910: 1908: 1898: 1895: 1871: 1868: 1857:Message added 1855: 1842: 1840: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1819: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1800: 1795: 1790: 1785: 1780: 1749: 1746: 1724: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1665: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1549: 1546: 1535:Philip Trueman 1529: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1493: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1454: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1417: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1378: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1341: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1280: 1277: 1254: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1221: 1208: 1205: 1194:Philip Trueman 1188: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1140: 1137: 1106: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1068: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1010: 1007: 1006: 1005: 971: 968: 967: 966: 965: 964: 963: 962: 927: 926: 891: 888: 887: 886: 843: 840: 839: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 830: 788: 787: 778: 771: 752: 745: 655: 649: 648: 647: 604: 601: 600: 599: 598: 597: 573: 572: 553: 552: 517: 514: 513: 512: 493: 492: 464: 461: 460: 459: 458: 457: 440: 439: 376: 373: 372: 371: 370: 369: 368: 367: 366: 365: 364: 363: 296: 247:within 24hrs. 230: 227: 208: 205: 204: 203: 163:ClueBot NG is 160: 157: 134: 131: 130: 129: 104:Philip Trueman 95: 92: 91: 90: 61: 58: 56: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3417: 3402: 3398: 3394: 3389: 3388: 3387: 3383: 3379: 3374: 3373: 3372: 3368: 3364: 3360: 3357:is in order. 3356: 3349: 3339: 3332: 3330: 3329: 3328: 3327: 3324: 3319: 3314: 3308: 3301: 3297: 3294: 3289: 3284: 3281: 3280: 3279: 3278: 3274: 3270: 3269:79.216.184.12 3261: 3259: 3258: 3254: 3250: 3242: 3240: 3239: 3235: 3231: 3230:76.26.187.138 3227: 3223: 3215: 3213: 3211: 3207: 3203: 3202:201.171.42.41 3199: 3192: 3191: 3187: 3185: 3180: 3177: 3175: 3170: 3167: 3161: 3159: 3158: 3154: 3150: 3142: 3138: 3136: 3135: 3131: 3127: 3119: 3117: 3116: 3112: 3108: 3107:79.103.25.225 3099: 3087: 3083: 3079: 3075: 3071: 3068: 3064: 3060: 3056: 3053:provided for 3052: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3043: 3039: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3029: 3025: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3015: 3011: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3001: 2997: 2993: 2992: 2991: 2990: 2986: 2982: 2978: 2970: 2968: 2967: 2964: 2962: 2956: 2948: 2946: 2945: 2941: 2935: 2929: 2925: 2917: 2913: 2911: 2910: 2906: 2902: 2898: 2894: 2886: 2884: 2883: 2879: 2875: 2870: 2863: 2859: 2855: 2851: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2840: 2836: 2827: 2825: 2823: 2819: 2815: 2811: 2804: 2799: 2795: 2789: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2775: 2773: 2769: 2765: 2761: 2755: 2747: 2743: 2739: 2735: 2731: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2719: 2715: 2711: 2703: 2697: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2676: 2672: 2668: 2664: 2660: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2651: 2647: 2643: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2631: 2627: 2621: 2618: 2617:Blair Waldorf 2610: 2606: 2602: 2598: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2590: 2586: 2582: 2578: 2571: 2565: 2557: 2554: 2550: 2546: 2542: 2538: 2537: 2536: 2532: 2528: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2514: 2510: 2505: 2501: 2493: 2489: 2485: 2481: 2477: 2473: 2467: 2461: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2453: 2449: 2445: 2441: 2430: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2406: 2402: 2394: 2392: 2391: 2387: 2383: 2382:92.239.71.235 2379: 2372: 2369: 2368: 2364: 2360: 2352: 2346: 2343: 2338: 2333: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2320: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2307: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2291: 2287: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2276: 2272: 2271:182.53.48.177 2264: 2258: 2254: 2250: 2245: 2241: 2240:User:XLinkBot 2237: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2231: 2227: 2223: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2202: 2199: 2196: 2194: 2188: 2184: 2182: 2181:Stacey Slater 2178: 2170: 2156: 2153: 2150: 2145: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2131: 2127: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2118: 2115: 2110: 2104: 2100: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2046: 2042: 2034: 2027: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2010: 2006: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1994: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1932: 1906: 1902: 1896: 1894: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1877: 1870:I'm impressed 1864: 1860: 1853: 1846: 1838: 1834: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1820: 1818: 1815: 1814: 1812: 1808: 1804: 1801: 1799: 1796: 1794: 1791: 1789: 1786: 1784: 1781: 1779: 1776: 1775: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1755: 1747: 1745: 1744: 1741: 1740: 1734: 1733: 1722: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1698: 1697: 1694: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1663: 1653: 1650: 1647: 1638: 1637: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1609: 1606: 1597: 1596: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1583: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1572: 1569: 1560: 1559: 1547: 1545: 1544: 1540: 1536: 1533: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1504: 1503: 1500: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1429: 1427: 1423: 1415: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1353: 1351: 1347: 1339: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1291:208.96.187.44 1288: 1278: 1276: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1265:208.96.187.44 1262: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1226: 1225: 1220: 1218:Sven Manguard 1206: 1204: 1203: 1199: 1195: 1192: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1136: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1125:86.181.253.37 1122: 1116: 1112: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1066: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1028: 1022: 1021: 1016: 1008: 1004: 1001: 1000: 997: 992: 991: 990: 989: 986: 985: 982: 977: 969: 961: 957: 953: 949: 945: 944: 943: 939: 935: 931: 930: 929: 928: 925: 921: 917: 912: 911: 910: 909: 905: 901: 897: 889: 885: 881: 877: 873: 872: 871: 868: 864: 860: 856: 852: 841: 829: 825: 821: 816: 812: 808: 807: 806: 802: 798: 794: 790: 789: 786: 783: 779: 776: 772: 769: 765: 761: 757: 753: 749: 746: 743: 742: 738: 734: 730: 726: 722: 718: 717: 716: 712: 708: 703: 702: 701: 697: 693: 689: 688: 687: 686: 682: 678: 674: 670: 666: 661: 654: 650: 646: 642: 638: 634: 633: 632: 629: 625: 621: 617: 613: 602: 596: 593: 588: 583: 577: 576: 575: 574: 571: 567: 563: 559: 555: 554: 548: 544: 540: 536: 528: 524: 520: 519: 515: 511: 507: 503: 499: 495: 494: 491: 487: 483: 479: 478:역대 아르헨티나의 대가리 475: 471: 468:일국의 군 통수권자에게 467: 466: 462: 456: 452: 448: 444: 443: 442: 441: 438: 434: 430: 426: 422: 419: 418: 417: 416: 411: 407: 402: 398: 393: 384: 381: 374: 362: 359: 355: 351: 350: 349: 345: 341: 336: 335: 334: 330: 326: 322: 318: 317: 316: 313: 306: 300: 297: 295: 291: 287: 283: 282: 281: 277: 273: 269: 266:ClueBot from 265: 261: 260: 259: 258: 254: 250: 246: 241: 240: 238: 236: 234: 228: 226: 225: 222: 217: 206: 202: 198: 194: 190: 186: 185: 184: 183: 180: 177: 174: 170: 166: 158: 156: 155: 152: 147: 142: 132: 128: 124: 120: 116: 115: 114: 113: 109: 105: 100: 93: 89: 86: 82: 81: 80: 79: 75: 71: 67: 59: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3363:Congratulate 3333:I believe a 3305: 3265: 3246: 3225: 3221: 3219: 3194:Thank you. 3193: 3188: 3181: 3178: 3171: 3168: 3165: 3146: 3123: 3103: 2974: 2952: 2924:Sailsbystars 2920: 2890: 2867: 2831: 2814:92.17.37.148 2790: 2776: 2764:92.17.96.225 2750: 2707: 2622: 2614: 2572: 2569: 2549:HTTP Cookies 2497: 2434: 2401:98.111.95.78 2398: 2380: 2376: 2356: 2268: 2243: 2203: 2200: 2197: 2189: 2185: 2174: 2171:A suggestion 2098: 2038: 2018:80.98.58.118 1945: 1903: 1900: 1879: 1873: 1753: 1751: 1736: 1729: 1726: 1695: 1692: 1676:61.7.120.132 1667: 1640: 1635:Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм 1632: 1599: 1594:Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм 1591: 1562: 1557:Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм 1554: 1551: 1531: 1501: 1498: 1495: 1456: 1419: 1380: 1343: 1319: 1282: 1256: 1223: 1210: 1190: 1142: 1114: 1113:by cluebot, 1110: 1108: 1070: 1019: 1012: 998: 995: 983: 980: 975: 973: 893: 845: 767: 759: 755: 724: 720: 672: 668: 663: 657: 606: 557: 497: 477: 469: 420: 401:CRGreathouse 399: 385: 378: 242: 232: 210: 168: 164: 162: 136: 117:Also fixed. 97: 63: 55: 43: 37: 3307:The new guy 3287:Airplaneman 3196:—Preceding 3172:As you now 2960:Ohconfucius 2808:—Preceding 2758:—Preceding 2575:—Preceding 2541:WikiCookies 2527:Lerdthenerd 2504:FisherQueen 2438:—Preceding 2012:—Preceding 1756:flag, e.g. 1670:—Preceding 1285:—Preceding 1259:—Preceding 1119:—Preceding 855:Catlover324 849:—Preceding 610:—Preceding 533:—Preceding 321:still at it 270:for now. - 36:This is an 3393:Crispy1989 3367:Complaints 3051:ClueBot NG 2850:Crispy1989 2730:Crispy1989 2642:Crispy1989 2597:Crispy1989 2466:db-blanked 2417:Crispy1989 2311:Crispy1989 2222:Crispy1989 1963:Crispy1989 1919:Heuristic: 1861:. You can 1811:ClueBot NG 1707:Crispy1989 1648:• 3:58pm • 1645:Champagne? 1618:Crispy1989 1607:• 9:59pm • 1604:Champagne? 1570:• 5:40pm • 1567:Champagne? 1548:ClueBot NG 1514:Crispy1989 1478:Crispy1989 1453:Impressive 1439:Crispy1989 1402:Crispy1989 1377:Impressive 1363:Crispy1989 1324:Crispy1989 1307:Crispy1989 1187:Well done! 1091:Crispy1989 1051:Crispy1989 1037:screenshot 952:Crispy1989 916:Crispy1989 876:Crispy1989 820:Crispy1989 760:should not 707:Crispy1989 637:Crispy1989 447:Crispy1989 354:optin list 340:Crispy1989 193:Crispy1989 119:Crispy1989 99:ClueBot NG 83:Fixed. -- 70:Saddhiyama 3378:Stepheng3 3355:Stepheng3 3312:mechamind 3243:Vandalism 3166:Hey, hi. 3078:Stepheng3 3055:this edit 3024:Stepheng3 2996:Stepheng3 2981:Stepheng3 2893:this edit 2833:detected. 2545:Barnstars 2500:this edit 2444:92.8.4.83 2331:mechamind 2183:earlier. 2177:this edit 2099:Suported. 2007:links to 1923:Reverted: 1748:Bot flag? 1463:Millahnna 1387:Millahnna 1239:Yair rand 1067:Good Work 946:There is 581:mechamind 527:Argentina 496:생각해 보세요. 429:Sf5xeplus 286:Sf5xeplus 249:Sf5xeplus 140:mechamind 3249:Davide41 3198:unsigned 3149:Vater-96 2934:contribs 2810:unsigned 2760:unsigned 2611:Question 2577:unsigned 2513:contribs 2440:unsigned 2193:Friendly 2014:unsigned 1979:It's on 1913:Article: 1884:Student7 1839:Talkback 1761:Tijfo098 1738:OLAJUWON 1672:unsigned 1422:this one 1346:this one 1287:unsigned 1261:unsigned 1121:unsigned 863:contribs 851:unsigned 762:per the 669:"Thanks" 624:contribs 612:unsigned 547:contribs 535:unsigned 304:LarryMac 3100:Demeter 2874:SmartSE 2688:James26 2626:James26 2480:SmartSE 2476:notable 2103:example 1921:Reason: 1723:ClueBot 1426:Arthena 1350:Arthena 1173:Msnicki 1157:Msnicki 1076:Hasteur 1015:Cluebot 272:Kingpin 264:blocked 66:warning 39:archive 3359:930913 3126:emijrp 3042:SnoFox 2551:. -- 2359:Ixfd64 2286:WP:AIV 1693:Please 1499:Please 1041:SnoFox 996:Please 981:Please 934:Ixfd64 900:Ixfd64 797:DePiep 768:cannot 729:DePiep 692:DePiep 677:DePiep 562:시스플라티나 539:시스플라티나 502:시스플라티나 482:시스플라티나 392:OEIS2C 310:| Talk 3348:whale 3343:or a 3338:trout 3040:. -- 2940:email 2887:Wow!! 2143:Alfie 2108:Alfie 1985:Kiore 1948:Kiore 1942:Other 1915:Diff: 1911:User: 1731:WAYNE 1696:Stand 1502:Stand 1237::) -- 999:Stand 984:Stand 751:page. 721:could 474:아르헨티나 262:I've 220:lozzo 16:< 3397:talk 3382:talk 3282:See 3273:talk 3253:talk 3234:talk 3226:need 3206:talk 3153:talk 3130:talk 3111:talk 3082:talk 3038:here 3028:talk 3014:talk 3000:talk 2985:talk 2957:. -- 2955:this 2928:talk 2905:talk 2878:talk 2854:talk 2839:talk 2818:talk 2798:talk 2783:talk 2768:talk 2744:Re. 2734:talk 2718:talk 2692:talk 2646:talk 2630:talk 2601:talk 2585:talk 2553:Cobi 2543:and 2531:talk 2509:talk 2484:talk 2448:talk 2421:talk 2405:talk 2395:Stop 2386:talk 2363:talk 2315:talk 2299:talk 2275:talk 2253:talk 2226:talk 2210:talk 2130:talk 2090:talk 2074:talk 2055:talk 2022:talk 1989:talk 1967:talk 1952:talk 1888:talk 1880:that 1830:Cobi 1765:talk 1711:talk 1680:talk 1622:talk 1582:Cobi 1539:talk 1518:talk 1482:talk 1467:talk 1459:this 1443:talk 1406:talk 1391:talk 1383:this 1367:talk 1328:talk 1311:talk 1295:talk 1269:talk 1253:Wow. 1243:talk 1224:Talk 1198:talk 1177:talk 1161:talk 1129:talk 1095:talk 1080:talk 1055:talk 976:very 956:talk 948:this 938:talk 920:talk 904:talk 898:. -- 880:talk 859:talk 824:talk 815:BRFA 811:BRFA 801:talk 795:". - 782:Cobi 733:talk 711:talk 696:talk 681:talk 660:this 653:Watt 641:talk 620:talk 566:talk 543:talk 523:Head 506:talk 486:talk 451:talk 433:talk 358:Cobi 344:talk 329:talk 290:talk 276:talk 253:talk 215:Joja 197:talk 189:BRFA 123:talk 108:talk 85:Cobi 74:talk 64:The 3353:to 3186:: 3174:FOX 2244:may 2179:to 1909:ID: 1828:-- 1115:not 780:-- 673:bot 658:re 651:re 470:대가리 421:yes 243:On 179:何献龙 169:not 165:not 3399:) 3384:) 3369:) 3351:}} 3345:{{ 3341:}} 3335:{{ 3275:) 3267:-- 3255:) 3236:) 3208:) 3155:) 3132:) 3113:) 3084:) 3030:) 3016:) 3002:) 2987:) 2942:) 2907:) 2880:) 2856:) 2841:) 2820:) 2785:) 2770:) 2736:) 2720:) 2694:) 2673:, 2669:, 2665:, 2661:, 2648:) 2632:) 2603:) 2587:) 2533:) 2511:· 2486:) 2468:}} 2464:{{ 2450:) 2423:) 2407:) 2388:) 2365:) 2317:) 2301:) 2277:) 2255:) 2247:-- 2228:) 2212:) 2148:↑↓ 2132:) 2113:↑↓ 2092:) 2076:) 2057:) 2047:-- 2043:, 2024:) 1991:) 1969:) 1954:) 1925:No 1890:) 1813:: 1767:) 1713:) 1682:) 1641:• 1624:) 1600:• 1563:• 1541:) 1520:) 1484:) 1469:) 1445:) 1408:) 1393:) 1369:) 1330:) 1313:) 1297:) 1271:) 1245:) 1200:) 1179:) 1163:) 1131:) 1111:or 1097:) 1082:) 1057:) 1023:♫ 958:) 940:) 922:) 906:) 882:) 865:) 861:• 826:) 803:) 735:) 725:es 713:) 698:) 683:) 643:) 626:) 622:• 568:) 549:) 545:• 508:) 488:) 453:) 435:) 408:| 395:}} 389:{{ 346:) 331:) 292:) 278:) 255:) 199:) 191:. 176:XL 125:) 110:) 76:) 3395:( 3380:( 3365:/ 3361:( 3322:0 3317:9 3292:✈ 3271:( 3251:( 3232:( 3204:( 3151:( 3143:? 3128:( 3109:( 3080:( 3026:( 3012:( 2998:( 2983:( 2937:• 2931:• 2926:( 2903:( 2876:( 2852:( 2837:( 2816:( 2781:( 2766:( 2732:( 2716:( 2690:( 2677:. 2675:5 2671:4 2667:3 2663:2 2659:1 2644:( 2628:( 2599:( 2583:( 2529:( 2515:) 2507:( 2482:( 2446:( 2419:( 2403:( 2384:( 2361:( 2341:0 2336:9 2313:( 2297:( 2273:( 2251:( 2224:( 2208:( 2152:© 2128:( 2117:© 2088:( 2072:( 2053:( 2045:2 2041:1 2020:( 1987:( 1965:( 1950:( 1886:( 1854:. 1763:( 1754:b 1709:( 1678:( 1620:( 1537:( 1516:( 1480:( 1465:( 1441:( 1404:( 1389:( 1365:( 1326:( 1309:( 1293:( 1267:( 1241:( 1196:( 1175:( 1159:( 1127:( 1093:( 1078:( 1053:( 954:( 936:( 918:( 902:( 878:( 857:( 822:( 799:( 777:. 770:. 756:b 731:( 709:( 694:( 679:( 639:( 618:( 591:0 586:9 564:( 541:( 504:( 484:( 449:( 431:( 412:) 410:c 406:t 404:( 342:( 327:( 288:( 274:( 251:( 195:( 173:H 150:0 145:9 121:( 106:( 72:( 50:.

Index

User talk:ClueBot Commons
archive
current talk page
warning
Saddhiyama
talk
18:58, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Cobi
19:03, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
ClueBot NG
Philip Trueman
talk
19:01, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Crispy1989
talk
19:10, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
mechamind
9
0
20:28, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
H
XL
何献龙
22:08, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
BRFA
Crispy1989
talk
22:32, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Joja
lozzo

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.