287:. "Simple and readable... provide the performance of C..." He does also mention "fast compile times" later in the video, but the problem with that was previous reviewers and editors objected to it being used as a source and any YouTube videos by the V project, though it might be time to reconsider. Oddly, the V draft appeared to be put under greater restrictions and arguably a different set of rules than what other programming language articles demonstrate (who reference their own site(s) and videos repeatedly). My issue is more about using that particular source for "fast compile times". If anything, it would arguably be better to put maintainability there (as referred to on their website and other sources) or use a different source for "fast compile times".
407:, thanks for the talk page message and sorry for the partial revert! I'm not sure I like the paragraph organization based on "projects exist both to create entirely new operating systems in Rust and to integrate Rust components into established systems." I'm not familiar with r9 but your edit suggests it could be arguably placed in either category, and it's not clear that's the most relevant dimension to group projects by. The other thing is that I would like to have the Rust for Linux and Windows mentions first, following the principle of ordering by most notable to least notable. Beyond that my intention was just to tighten the writing, I like the mention of r9! Thanks,
33:
550:
483:
94:
talk page and history, to get a better understanding. To avoid getting into edit wars or issues with vandalizing articles for any arbitrary reasons, it would be much more constructive to specifically point out what any grievances are on our talk pages or V's. It would be better for editors to come to an understanding or consensus.
93:
article (and as a draft) was vetted by numerous editors over a long period of time to not be promotional or advertisement-like. In comparison to the articles of many other programming languages on
Knowledge, it is arguably very much not so and care was taken to make sure it was not so. Do read V's
290:
Anyway, the reason for coming here is that we are probably in agreement with the lead and history sections, minus that particular goal. Not sure if it's really worth getting into passionate epic internet battles over it. Also, in re-reading V's talk, it looks more like a brawl between me and you.
282:
The article you refer to is showing that V is capable of fast compile times, but not that it was a goal or purpose of the language. I'm of the opinion that it's more suitable as a source for readability, because of statements like, "V has a simpler, more readable syntax". Detail clarification of
250:
This is to note that you appear intent on vandalizing the article. You did not list any specifics for anything from the previous template, and put up a new template, in what appears to be an attempt to justify violating the three-revert rule. Even with the new template, you are not giving any
129:
Hi Caleb, you didn't list any needed improvements. More specifically, it should be a list of what specifically is promotional or advertisement-like. Do you have some ulterior motive for sparking a confrontation? You appear to be going outside of the original context, and into a confrontation
380:
Hi, I was wondering why you reverted the order of the adoption section. I hoped that ordering the operating systems in terms of their reliance in rust, with native first, would appear more logical. I placed r9 in the middle, whilst based on a legacy design still more "native" than win or linux
201:
You have resorted to multiple changing tags, as the first move. And appear to be avoiding specifically resolving the issue, in what looks like vandalism. There are no list of issues here on your page and in this exchange. There is nothing you have listed here about the article that can be
421:
I have taken your point regarding brevity and run with it! My suggested amendment takes away dates and other filler on
Windows, Android and Linux implementation (I don't think the lay reader needs to know what kernel version enabled rust or how many lines of rust code in windows - there are
144:
There were many examples, so rather than list all of them I edited to improve or note them where present. You may ask, but you did not answer the question. I am not involved in the development of Rust, the Rust toolchain, or the Rust foundation.
422:
references and Linux links to rust-on-linux for those who want to know more). Also added mention of
Fuchsia. Edit - I posted the draft here but decided to save it on page so to avoid cluttering your own talk page with refs!
180:
Additionally, "Simply being of the opinion that a page is not neutral is not sufficient to justify the addition of the tag. Tags should be added as a last resort. Also avoid over-tagging...".
275:
I'm giving you more information on why I removed and objected to "fast compile times" as one of the (primary) goals of the V programming language. If you look at their
159:
I am not involved in the development of V, the V toolchain, or in any V organization. I am not paid by any V organization or any persons associated with it.
251:
specifics, which is required. This comes across as Drive-by tagging. Does this behavior have anything to do with any affiliation you may have with Rust?
202:
discussed. This is why I asked about your affiliation with Rust, which may create an conflict of interest and motivation for what is happening here.
342:
333:
384:
It might also be worth commenting that native systems expect to take advantage of the benefits of rust in a way that legacy systems cannot.
558:
465:
109:
Hi
Wukuendo, of course and not a problem, I will be more clear about the needed improvements. May I ask what is your connection to Vlang?
544:
54:
49:
554:
486:
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
103:
307:
540:
533:
469:
458:
279:, they make statements such as, "The language promotes writing simple and clear code with minimal abstraction."
66:
90:
561:
failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.
529:
454:
352:
341:
If you are interested in our Utah
Knowledge Day celebration on Saturday, January 27, 2024, please visit
577:
502:
402:
385:
513:
434:
408:
389:
311:
292:
252:
221:
203:
146:
131:
110:
95:
296:
256:
207:
135:
99:
72:
564:
489:
366:
68:
32:
573:
568:
498:
493:
477:
433:
The edit looks OK to me. Please take this discussion to the Rust talk page going forward.
17:
276:
473:
217:
362:
70:
581:
521:
506:
442:
416:
393:
370:
319:
300:
284:
260:
229:
211:
154:
139:
118:
283:
what those goals are for the language were elaborated on by its creator in
220:
if you continue to disagree. You can link the request on the V talk page.
334:
Interested in celebrating
Knowledge Day in Park City during Sundance?
348:
291:
Maybe it's time for us to give deescalation or diplomacy a try.
73:
26:
81:
130:
direction. And may I ask what is your connection to Rust?
329:
82:
What's considered to be of a promotional tone for V
381:because it rewrites the kernel in one fell swoop.
464:Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
8:
512:Thank you for signing up for the review!
343:Knowledge:Meetup/Utah/Wikipedia Day 2024
7:
306:Let's take this discussion to the
25:
355:page for an event near you! ~~~~
271:Fast compile times as a goal of V
555:Talk:Constant-recursive sequence
548:
481:
31:
326:Sat Jan 27: Utah Knowledge Day!
1:
371:19:34, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
320:14:56, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
301:06:02, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
261:15:03, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
230:15:31, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
212:15:27, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
155:15:11, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
140:14:45, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
119:14:34, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
104:14:18, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
541:Constant-recursive sequence
534:Constant-recursive sequence
470:Constant-recursive sequence
459:Constant-recursive sequence
597:
582:16:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
522:16:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
507:03:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
443:15:52, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
310:rather than here. Thanks,
476:-status according to the
417:16:04, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
394:08:04, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
376:Rust - "adoption" section
517:
438:
412:
315:
225:
150:
114:
18:User talk:Cstanford.math
563:Message delivered by
488:Message delivered by
345:to add your response.
543:you nominated as a
472:you nominated for
571:
496:
360:
359:
351:area? Check the
79:
78:
60:
59:
16:(Redirected from
588:
562:
557:for reasons why
552:
551:
487:
485:
484:
406:
330:
74:
46:
45:
35:
27:
21:
596:
595:
591:
590:
589:
587:
586:
585:
567:, on behalf of
549:
537:
492:, on behalf of
482:
466:begun reviewing
462:
400:
378:
328:
273:
216:Please request
84:
75:
69:
40:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
594:
592:
559:the nomination
536:
532:nomination of
526:
525:
524:
514:Caleb Stanford
461:
457:nomination of
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
435:Caleb Stanford
426:
425:
424:
423:
409:Caleb Stanford
377:
374:
358:
357:
346:
337:
336:
327:
324:
323:
322:
312:Caleb Stanford
285:YouTube videos
272:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
263:
243:
242:
241:
240:
239:
238:
237:
236:
235:
234:
233:
232:
222:Caleb Stanford
190:
189:
188:
187:
186:
185:
184:
183:
182:
181:
169:
168:
167:
166:
165:
164:
163:
162:
161:
160:
147:Caleb Stanford
122:
121:
111:Caleb Stanford
83:
80:
77:
76:
71:
67:
65:
62:
61:
58:
57:
52:
42:
41:
36:
30:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
593:
584:
583:
579:
575:
570:
566:
560:
556:
546:
542:
535:
531:
527:
523:
519:
515:
511:
510:
509:
508:
504:
500:
495:
491:
479:
475:
471:
467:
460:
456:
452:
444:
440:
436:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
420:
419:
418:
414:
410:
404:
398:
397:
396:
395:
391:
387:
382:
375:
373:
372:
368:
364:
356:
354:
353:Knowledge Day
350:
344:
339:
338:
335:
332:
331:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
304:
303:
302:
298:
294:
288:
286:
280:
278:
277:documentation
270:
262:
258:
254:
249:
248:
247:
246:
245:
244:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
214:
213:
209:
205:
200:
199:
198:
197:
196:
195:
194:
193:
192:
191:
179:
178:
177:
176:
175:
174:
173:
172:
171:
170:
158:
157:
156:
152:
148:
143:
142:
141:
137:
133:
128:
127:
126:
125:
124:
123:
120:
116:
112:
108:
107:
106:
105:
101:
97:
92:
87:
64:
63:
56:
53:
51:
48:
47:
44:
43:
39:
34:
29:
28:
19:
545:good article
539:The article
538:
468:the article
463:
383:
379:
361:
340:
289:
281:
274:
88:
85:
37:
565:ChristieBot
547:has failed
490:ChristieBot
347:Not in the
308:V Talk page
574:Dedhert.Jr
569:Dedhert.Jr
499:Dedhert.Jr
494:Dedhert.Jr
86:Hi Caleb,
403:Squizzler
386:Squizzler
55:Archive 2
50:Archive 1
478:criteria
293:Wukuendo
253:Wukuendo
204:Wukuendo
132:Wukuendo
96:Wukuendo
38:Archives
553:; see
363:Pharos
528:Your
453:Your
218:WP:3O
578:talk
518:talk
503:talk
439:talk
413:talk
390:talk
367:talk
349:Utah
316:talk
297:talk
257:talk
226:talk
208:talk
151:talk
136:talk
115:talk
100:talk
89:The
572:--
497:--
399:Hi
580:)
530:GA
520:)
505:)
480:.
474:GA
455:GA
441:)
415:)
392:)
369:)
318:)
299:)
259:)
228:)
210:)
153:)
138:)
117:)
102:)
576:(
516:(
501:(
437:(
411:(
405::
401:@
388:(
365:(
314:(
295:(
255:(
224:(
206:(
149:(
134:(
113:(
98:(
91:V
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
