User talk:Cprice1000/Archive 6

918:

Love?)", what even? xD I got it on iTunes the day it came out, I really like it. Yeah, the single choice was weird, but I don't even think we can call it a single, it was only released digitally. All her songs sound look promo songs to me. And yeah, it sounds cool! I really wanted to get it, but I can't afford it. I have no job or anything. xD I might get it off eBay one day though. And yeah, I wanted the one for FF too. I just bought it in stores the day of the release. xD Haha, do what you can, and I'd be happy to help out with them. :) I just noticed "I Wanna Go" got its own page up. It looks like "I Wanna Go" and "Big Fat Bass" are going to be released as next singles. IWG international, and BFB in the US. The promo CD leaked I guess. Sounds good to me, though I'd rather have IWG worldwide.

2532: 31: 2971: 2065: 1828: 1765: 1662: 1594: 259: 301:

I'll listen to it later. I'm mostly disappointed that "Cold" isn't on it. But both songs could appear on the US version. Let's hope. Haha yeah. I honestly can't decide which ones are better, to be honest. They're all amazing to me. Haha, Unique did most of the work. I'm more of a copy-editing kind of editor. xD Not really a content finder and article grower. Hopefully soon we can get

2207:

top 10 in the US, it should creep inside the top 10 of iTunes first. I applause B for her new musical direction. Critical reception (professional) have embraced both the single and its video. I am also happy that she is not turning towards generic pop. It is fans who are not liking any of them. Do you think Beyonce's days in the music industry are over?

2990:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 1250:. But the song is not notable enough. I mean, only persons who bought the album actually know the song. I know this is not a reason to delete the article. But, if you really want to nominate it as a GA, you should make several changes first: expand more the composition section. Plus, the info in that section is about the background. Examples: 3099:

bit bias and no original research, something that an IP user would add. And yeah, I don't care if there are negative reviews in an article, you need them to make up a decent section. Not every song/video is perfect in everyones eyes. (Even though I don't think the video is as bad as what people are saying).

3098:

Lol, well, I get defensive as well, so good times. You would achieve the same literary result just by saying "we just need to accept that Gaga has released an awful video", which reads so much better. Even if swearing is allowed, it's not nice to read and the quote "complete shit" does sound a little

2488:

Yup. After this, she may disappear for 3 years, raise her kids, get the conservat...whatty...word by her father taken off and get back to herself. I feels and looks so glassy eyed these days. Like a shell. I think her dad and her record label are trying to show a happy appearance, but I don't believe

1222:

Why the shock? Haha. I was just thinking about how bare the article was. The song was used in an Adidas commercial, and I know I've seen coverage about that, so I'll start working on it shortly. It'd be awesome for us to collaborate on it! If you don't have much time, but find some sources, feel free

1025:

JLO's been out for years, so I think hers is deff more needed than Swifty. JLO has over like, what, 40 movies? And she's on her 7th album, 30+ singles, discography, videgraphy, filmography... etc. I'd be great if you could help me with the layout of the page, and info, etc. I want to purpose it later

2654:

Haha, exact same with me buddy! :P I'm pretty sure I heard "Starry Eyed" before, but I think that's it. Maybe I'll give her a listen later. My computer is currently being reformatted. Yes, I have! Woah, really?! I'm surprised as well. Hopefully it can debut on the Hot 100. This may finally her time.

2206:

But i agree with you. You know, instead of criticizing Beyonce, people should see that she is trying something different. Very few artists do that but it always turns into a disaster. I do not know if the video will save the single. it managed to move from #173 to #29 on iTunes but to reach at least

1175: 300:

Yeah, I just saw it, and reverted it. xD It doesn't sound too bad to me honestly, but with all the work they've been doing on it, some of those songs shouldn't be on it. I don't think it's real anyway, so it doesn't matter. I never heard "Guns and Roses" honestly. I tried not to listen to the leaks.

802:

Haha, yeah. I love the album too! The only one I don't like is Drop Dead. It's a weak point of the album to me. The Bloodshy tracks and "Big Fat Bass" are my top 3 songs! They are such jams!! I wish she would have done that. :( Only eight songs, it would have been PERFECT. But she is pretty busy on

1118:

I'll gladly keep it as mixed if you can find the negative reviews that may have disappeared but I just see way more positive then negative now, and for the most part the positive's range from 5/5 stars to 4/5 stars, which is pretty good. Thus, I believe the correct summary for the reviews would be

1333:

video is of Kylie discussing the album's development with US radio's Z100. This is part 1, part 2 is on the side of the page. Also there is another interview with Kylie and Stuart Price. You dont need to linjk the youtube videos, just ask me after you are done adding the content, I'll source it

917:

Haha, me too! There was a bit of confusion whether "I'm Into You" was a single or not, for example. xD What do you think about the track list? I like it, but I wish "Hooked on You" was on the deluxe, and "Take Care" was on the standard. And I don't like how "What is Love?" is titled "(What Is)

1930:

Her hips dont lie is also one of her best songs and one of my fav8s.i think its an aawweessomme song she does a great job in it.her movement r so graceful in her all songs including she wolf,hips dont lie,waka waka etc. i like her all songs and also objection(tango)which is so nice.rply back

1352:

Hi Mr. Price. How are you doing? I have just nominated Queen B's discography for FL. As always, i am sticking to her articles. Now working on videography,. Actually Adabow started the videography. Just helping him a bit. I need your help. Could you please write a synopsis for the video of

2467:

I know exactly what you mean and I agree with that. I just want her to get back with Danja, Max Martin (and only Max Martin, no Dr. Luke or Billboard), Bloodshy, and Darkchild and make a smashing comeback after this album. Femme Fatale is seriously looking like Britney's

2575:

Even though the production sounds like a (better) copy of Run the World, it works better with this track. In fact, in parts it comes close to the magnificence of B-Day! I really think I will love this song when I get to hear the "For-internal-use-only-free radio edit :P

1013:

Firefox didn't recognize it, and I swear that it was supposed to be baseline, but whatever. xD Yeah! I think so as well. I think J.Lo deff needs one more. I'd be happy to start one up with you. That'd be amazing. And I don't, sorry, I'm no good at getting info.

2151:

You are welcome my friend. Well Calvin often does things he should not but we cannot control him. He is kind of stubborn you know. And he likes replying back. I wonder what a verbal fight between him and Legolas will look like. Lol. (No offense Legolas.).

1522:

Ah okay. To tell you frankly, i came to know about the song only three days ago. And i like it after only 2 or 3 plays. I like this type of Keri. Lol. Bye. I have got something important to do (Still my Beyonce articles. Lol.) Take care.

508:

Yeah, I see what he means. xD I'm just upset it got failed so quickly. That'd be great if you could help. As for the archives, I seriously CANNOT find out what's wrong with them. On another note, can you please take place in this

2643:"I will reply on MY OWN talk page, so have it on your watchlist." I'm special, so you can reply to me on my talk, right? And I probably never would end up seeing the reply. I watch some many things it isn't even funny. 2358:

Yes, she released a "Remix EP" to promote the tour. I am still gathering all of the details before I dub it a single. After the response on tour, she released the lyric video, after the response to the lyric video,

2363:

decided to release it. After Astralwerks decided to release it, Parlophone jumped on. Let's see what happens! :) Also, please re-read that deletion discussion. Not only am I deleting it because it violates

1197:

Well, thank you. But I think it's really your work that made the article look great :) I hope you don't mind me taking two or three days to finish those sections (I have some important stuff coming up irl)

939: 775:

I honestly don't see any need to make one for L&L, but whatever floats your boat. xD Sorry for the late reply, been messing with my user page. xD Was gonna add tabs, but couldn't get it properly. :(

93: 1283:

for an example. And yes, I agree that quantity is not necessary for a GA, but the quality of this article is mid... However, this is more like a stub than a article, because, considering the

2531: 2277:

Ah okayyyyyyyy. I have understood now. You know i thought you had started hating Beyonce. Lol. Such a relief. Seems like she will perform the song tomorrow at the Billboard Music Awards.

803:

tour. xD I know you were involved a lot with "On the Floor" (HOORAY), so you should feel free to help out on the sandboxes I have started for "I'm Into You" and the other promo singles.

3028:

I wasn't vandalising. You have included an expletive, which is not necessary and makes what you have added look cheap. If you think I vandalised, you clearly don't know what it is.

2368:, but because there is a bigger sandbox started by WP:Kylie 2 months ago. Copy and pasting the information from the sandbox would break Knowledge Attribution rules. The sandbox is 2103:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 1866:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 1803:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 1700:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 1632:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 2911:

The article is shaping up amazingly. I'm sure its almost ready for GA and maybe beyond. Before that we could do with a few extra eyes over it. Could you take a look please? —

2099:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1862:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1799:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1696:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1628:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "

547: 841: 2549: 1279:

I don't think that date is necessary either. The song was released before the single and the release date is only needed if the song was released as a single. See

554: 2092:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

1855:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

1792:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

1689:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

1621:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

1090:

Also, look at the critical reception section most of the reviews were actually very positive and the comparisons to Express Yourself were not that negative.--

2545: 2088:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1851:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1788:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1685:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1617:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 3067:

to add it, it' doesn't read well at all, especially in what you have added. Would read a lot better simply by removing "complete shit" from the sentence.

2878:

I'm pretty sure I know why it's doing it though. I decided to make each achieve 100 bytes, so I got the two that were left all by themselves deleted.

2592:

I know, I tweeted a statement like that. I don't think its innovative or an improvement on her sound, but it gives you a good feeling in your heart.

2177:

Anyway, we haven't talked since long? Are you fine? How's life? What's new? Have you watched B's new video? And yes, the second single leaked today.

1162:

Yes!! I was thinking of fixing it up, but got lost amidst other projects, lol. Hmmm... earlier, Google Books had a great preview of a book called

944: 3002: 2937:

Yeah I agree... she shoulda gone with "Papi," "Invading My Mind" or "Hypnotico". She always manages to terminate her album-era's early. GRR! —

2108: 1871: 1808: 1705: 1637: 791:. That would have been amazing. LOL @ Beyoncepedia, I know what you mean. She has like 567898765679098767909765267894876728983789 articles. xD 263: 2538: 2787:

XD lol I know. I wish all artists would just make a flipping compilation album of unreleased songs every now and then. Is that too hard? --

1284: 496:. I'm gonna try my best to find out what the hell is wrong with them. I don't know about you, but it's really bothering me, personally! xD 332: 2030:

Cprice it is true na that shakira is with Gerard Pique?can u tell me something more about hr song Sale el sol i haven't seen the video..(

2472:. The only difference is that Rebirth was unsuccessful because she released the wrong second single. Femme Fatale just ain't good. :P -- 1264:

Also, try to re-write the lead section, and the release date is only valid if the song was released as a single/promotional single. -

253: 171:

That's exact;y what i am not able to figure out. It was supposed to be released but it was not. So, can i change the infobox to song?

3063:

What the hell? Knowledge is so strict on some things but you can include "shit" in articles? Even if it is allowed, doesn't mean you

2809:

If artists actually released mixtapes of leaked/unreleased material... e.g. they mastered some of the songs hell I'd buy them! :P —

2369: 1255: 249: 242: 975: 2469: 787:

She would like die. Baha! She has way to much on her plate to do something like that. xD I wish Gaga would have done one for

731:

In a completely unrelated incident, a sex scandal at my school just got busted wide open. You think I should report it here?

107: 84: 72: 67: 59: 2454:

has been a little contrived. Anyway, Coverlandia, the masters of fan covers, have labeled that cover as the official one.

883:

Thank you. It passes the notability guideline. Actually, if you want the GA, you can have it. Your good at song articles.

2708: 1776: 1673: 987: 697: 356: 2986:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 2753: 2080:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 1843:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 1780:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 1677:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 1609:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 1049: 852:

article, but the one you don't do, I will probably start with the singles for it. I wanna do Body Language... ... ...

2762:

songs will never reach the light of day but you'll see 5869676969 singles and 5869676968 remixes so all's good :P —

669: 526: 2991: 2372:. Dang Cprice, read the discussions (even though they are long) all the way through. You may figure out things. :P 2093: 1856: 1793: 1690: 1622: 38: 2982: 1605: 951:. If you are interested in joining, please visit the project page and add your name to the list of participants. 3102:

You're right, I just don't think it reads well or looks professional. It wouldn't be so bad if it was "sh*t" lol

2126: 1260: 492:

I've come to the conclusion the archive bot hates you. I've fixed them up for you again. Slap a deletion page on

2851: 2329: 2288: 2251: 2218: 2188: 2163: 2140: 1576: 1555: 1534: 1512: 1491: 1470: 1444: 1415: 1390: 1368: 1280: 588: 477: 452: 431: 410: 385: 207: 182: 160: 2502:

Oh, I don't think she is happy either. She might even slip further since FF is, as I said, kinda flopping. --

1223:

to drop the URLs off on either my talk page or the song's talk page, and I may be able to work with that. :)

2100: 1863: 1800: 1697: 1629: 1138: 1124: 1119:

positive. But once again if negative reviews are found to even out the positive then mixed would go fine.--

1109: 1095: 1080: 2076: 1839: 1174:. Legolas has a book, so he might be able to help. I'll try to expand the Composition section a bit :) Oh, 146: 3010: 2953: 2927: 2825: 2778: 2440: 1713: 1645: 1340: 1310: 1296: 1269: 1166:. It had information on how the album was conceived, now it's gone! You can start by saying a bit about 1134: 1120: 1105: 1091: 1076: 196:

Yes, i agree, really odd. Thank you for your help. I am going to bed now. Bye. See you soon. Take care.

2793: 2725:

It would be a GREAT second single. Also, I think they should mix in the "For Internal Use Only" lol.

2611: 2582: 2508: 2478: 2014: 47: 17: 964: 3113: 3078: 3042: 2841: 2738:

That's one thing I hate about Bey's recording process. 48 songs will never reach the light of day.

2319: 2278: 2241: 2208: 2178: 2153: 2130: 1566: 1545: 1524: 1502: 1481: 1460: 1434: 1405: 1380: 1358: 1354: 1291:. Just work a little more on it before nominate it as a GA, please. I know you can do it better. - 1228: 752:

Haha, he probably will kill you if he finds out. xD Welcome back! And WTF at the titling you used.

578: 467: 442: 421: 400: 375: 336: 197: 172: 150: 371: 2741: 2728: 2714: 2691: 2677: 2595: 2564: 2492: 2457: 2402: 2389: 2375: 2043: 2031: 2008: 1992: 1980: 1970: 1956: 1944: 1936: 1920: 1909: 1897: 1746: 1732: 1459:

Will you be able to write another synopsis for me? Its for "The Way You Love Me" by Keri Hilson.

1001:

Sorry for getting to this late. Looks pretty good so far. I'm gonna copyedit it a bit for ya. :)

959: 899: 886: 873: 855: 734: 721: 703: 650: 615: 273: 227: 541: 1404:

You are absolutely right. she is only in that part and she does not sing (in the music video).

513:

about whether Christina should be listed as a singer-songwriter or a recording artist? Thanks!

2424:. Everything about the new album is horrific. I don't the like the production or auto-tune. — 2365: 1205: 1185: 867: 804: 633: 628: 606: 3006: 2938: 2912: 2810: 2763: 2425: 2085: 1848: 1785: 1709: 1682: 1641: 1614: 1335: 1306: 1292: 1265: 1251: 1247: 983: 849: 641: 537: 352: 325: 305:

to become a Knowledge article. I'm on March break now, so I'll be able to work on it a lot.

420:

Can you please upload music samples for "Summertime" and "Fighting Temptation" by Beyonce?

2788: 2606: 2577: 2503: 2473: 2112: 1875: 1812: 1379:

Oh no. In fact, i just learnt that the song has a music video. Lol. Thanks for doing it.

441:

Oh you really do not have to be sorry Mr. Price. Lol. Any part you deem as appropriate.

128:

Look at the discussions I had with the other two, and you will understand what I meant.

3103: 3068: 3032: 2089: 1852: 1789: 1686: 1618: 1224: 673: 661: 574: 3128: 3093: 3057: 3014: 2957: 2931: 2884: 2872: 2856: 2829: 2798: 2782: 2746: 2733: 2719: 2696: 2682: 2661: 2649: 2637: 2616: 2600: 2587: 2569: 2513: 2497: 2483: 2462: 2444: 2407: 2394: 2380: 2334: 2293: 2256: 2223: 2193: 2168: 2145: 2115: 2018: 1940: 1924: 1878: 1815: 1751: 1737: 1717: 1649: 1581: 1560: 1539: 1517: 1496: 1475: 1449: 1420: 1395: 1373: 1342: 1314: 1300: 1273: 1232: 1211: 1191: 1142: 1128: 1113: 1099: 1084: 1058: 1043: 1032: 1020: 1007: 991: 924: 904: 891: 878: 860: 821: 797: 782: 770: 758: 739: 726: 708: 682: 655: 593: 563: 553:

Please contribute to the discuss whether or not this article should be deleted at its

519: 502: 493: 482: 457: 436: 415: 390: 360: 311: 289: 277: 231: 212: 187: 165: 134: 122: 2035: 2004: 1984: 1966: 1948: 1932: 1916: 1901: 1723: 1243: 693: 599: 344: 340: 268: 222: 2758:

what you mean? with B's strategy of re-releasing her albums 5869676970 times, maybe

2420:

I can't stand her. Everything about this era is so fake. I stopped liking her after

2987: 2891: 2081: 1979:

I think u r a big fan of her Hips dont lie.r u ? also tell me why in ur own words.(

1844: 1781: 1678: 1610: 1199: 1179: 948: 637: 258: 238: 2360: 979: 715: 533: 348: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2631:

Haha, you're welcome then! ;) I've actually never ever listened to her before.

1289:"a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Britney Spears on Knowledge" 812: 1330: 1287:

standards, information about the singer is actually important, since we are

510: 808: 609:. I'm currently in the stages of collecting some sources to start it up. 532:

Hi if you feel like it please participate in this articles Afd. Thanks.--

463: 1501:

Thank you. By the way, why don't you like it? I mean, its so different.

220:{{subst:GANotice|result=pass|article=Poison (Nicole Scherzinger song)} 2318:

I don't think she will release it so soon. Maybe in three weeks time.

1334:

according to Z100's episode (which I havent found yet). Clear? :) —

1075:

A discussion between two users does not form a consensus though.--

834: 462:

It is okay my friend. What an mazing coincidence. A reviewer from

1133:

Kk if you can find those again, mixed to positive will be fine.--

1892:

on that time i was in U.K.G. or 1st class. she became my favr8.

1242:

Look, don't get me wrong, but even now it probably don't fails

605:

I created a sandbox for the article. I'd be great if you could

25: 2969: 2552:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

2530: 2063: 1826: 1763: 1660: 1592: 1258:. You should also try to find more critical reception info. 714:

Really? You didn't know?? Really??? There great. What about

1758:

Orphaned non-free image File:Nicki Minaj-Moment 4 Life.jpg

1655:

Orphaned non-free image File:Nicki Minaj-Moment 4 Life.jpg

764:

Lol, you clever bitch! Naw, I was just super confused. xD

2840:

Wow. I am happy to hear that. Beyonce never disappoints.

1565:

It doesn't matter. And yes, i t is excellent. Thank you.

947:

dedicated to improving articles and lists related to the

2539:

Why Don't You Love Me (Beyoncé Knowles song)'s talk page

1888:

I am also a fan of $ hakira from when i listen her song

1329:

I know you have been searching for long, and here I am.

3001: