User talk:Crews Giles - Knowledge (XXG)

508:

respectable. I have no disagreement with those who believe in theistic evolution, or deistic evolution. I do disagree with the people who claim that the hand of God in evolution can be demonstrated scientifically, the proponents of intelligent design, because I believe that their empirical claims are untenable. But that would be nothing more than a private complaint if it weren't for their campaign to "intelligent design" - their specific theology - taught in schools as science. And it's not that I (necessarily) have a problem with religion in the classroom. But I have no interest in silencing them. Nor am I here to silence people I disagree with - there are people I disagree with far more strenuously than I do the IDists... I feel far more strongly about HIV denial, having seen people I know die of AIDS. I feel far more strongly about Holocaust denial. I feel far more strongly about local politicians engaging in what I perceive to be hate speech about LGBT people and illegal immigrants, and about neo-Nazis and the KKK....these are groups whose demise I would be happy to see. But I don't edit those articles because they don't interest me. But rather than learn anything of the facts, all you seek to do is smear me, discredit me, simply because I called you out on the nonsense you were writing. Nice work.

475:"Silencing any reasonable opponent"...spoken like someone with real political experience. It goes well with the forcefully fact-free pronouncements you made on the talk page. We aren't supposed to have "opponents" here - you would do well to stop assuming that people are your enemies just because they disagree with you. As for your claims that you have reason and truth on your side - if you have reason on your side, why not use it, rather than resorting to the tactics on politicians? As for truth...I'm always inclined to give someone with an MDiv more than a fair shake. Your claims about truth are either laughable, or just sad. It's people like you that make this place such a frustrating hobby. No interest in playing by "the rules", no concern for the time others put into trying to build an encyclopaedia. Sourcing is irrelevant. And the knowledge base that others have spent years building up? Irrelevant, because you know the TRUTH. 1440: 682:

relatives, so I actually rarely get to use my teapot and loose tea lately. I liked your comment about misconception not being the basis for inclusion. If that were the case, the article on libraries would have "liberry" as an alternate pronunciation. I don't think any proposals will be acceptable to certain people so I'm not going to involve myself any longer, so long as no incorrect unsourced information is slid back into the article.

1450: 1125: 1393: 634:

accused of personal attacks. Let's just say I think there's some wet ink on her wall. Thanks for your efforts and for bringing some humor to the discussion. I see nothing else to do at this point other than make sure no one sneaks any unsourced information about "high" tea in the article. There must be something out there about "high" tea at 4:20 though. hmmm....

916: 1087:

Ms.K is on me again about unimportant Texans & poor references... and that muster rolls used in books to show where people served don't mean diddly...I always thought it was definite proof, anyways if you got an opinion on my article, see the discussion for deletion page ? If you like it, I would

777:

I was hoping it wouldn't come to this. The US was not in the war but Americans were (The US gov did support the rebels though), which is why I named the template "Mexican-American wars" instead of "Wars between the US and Mexico," or something like that. I created the template to link together all of

186:

I have been participating in the various Talk Page discussions on the issue. Finding no consensus, but spurred (pardon my idiom) by more edits removing Texan from the article and replacing with Texian, and the one-sided edit war (skirmish, really) prompted me to attempt consensus through the Dispute

182:

I am certain and clear that the evidence supports the use of either; but that Texan is the modern, preferred, and, an equally historically-accurate term. Yet, I am not going to war over it-- that is, I am not going to revert edits, or change original contributions which use either-- as has been done

745:

Type 420 into google and the results are all about pot. There's even a 420 dating site. Who knew? Anyway, while fasting I think having "high" tea in that sense would be counterproductive. Meanwhile, I think I'm going to move to California and open up a tea house called the "high" tea cafe, and cater

600:

Post or Martin, I don't recall, stated something to the effect that the best of manners are used to prevent those with lesser social aptitudes from being embarrassed. I think, perhaps, the article hit just such a nerve with one or two editors. Miss Manners, blaming the hotels, is, therefore, being

471:

has been disproven. And no, I'm not out to silence them - I find them fascinating. I've seen most of the leading figures speak. I've had quite pleasant conversations with several of them. Like any people, some are nice, and some are jerks. Sadly, they've jumped the shark - the YECs are dominant once

451:

Had you bothered to read the article, you'd have realised that it clearly says that it is about the DI-linked form of ID. Why? For one, it's a matter of focus - if we try to cover every possible use of a term, we'd end up with hopelessly unfocused articles...one that's even longer than this one. And

256:

All scientific truths are reasonable, even if not fully understood (e.g., quantum mechanics), and so simply believing in a God who is also Creator will always confirm, for them, the intelligence of that Creator. I do not understand how the ID supporters see the expected reasonableness of scientific

1058:

And yes, I deleted the templated notice you sent me; it's acceptable to delete templated messages from your talk page, and since I was one of the people who drafted the terms of the probation, I'd been aware of their contents for quite some time. If you feel that I have violated them, you are free

834:

Yes, it was that bullet-point style of your agreement that made the indent of my reply appear to be merely a continuation of your comment, so I moved my self-identifying tag to within the first line of my comment. By-the-Way, "Uninvolved editors" are the sought-after opinions of an RfC; many, such

708:

Four-twenty-- I had no idea! Personally, my mind is on three o'clock when I can break the Good Friday fast. At present, I am waiting for my coffee order to arrive while the smell of hamburger orders fill the air in the little place where I have landed within walking distance of the Church. Ah...

652:

You did post that here-- as I read it last night. This morning, my watchlist shows your addition, above, as "Undid revision 485814328 by Njsustain (talk.)" Also saw, on the article's talk page, that you humbled yourself by admitting bagged, instead of loose, tea used. My mug in which I steeped my

387:

I have worked for political campaigns, marketing campaigns and ad copy. I have rejected the temptation to "get my shots in" as a newspaper reporter, getting myself out of the way so that the best objectivity I could muster showed. It takes discipline and a loathing of one's own agenda because you

311:

Give it rest. I'm not a schoolboy. Any insult you perceived is of your imagination and/or a failure to appreciate irony-- said irony having nothing at all to do with you in the first place. Do I really need to spell it out for you? Seriously? If you are truly confused, I will spell it out, but

455:

If you believe that the article "screams" POV, then why not take on the article? It has been an FA for 5 years and has gone through FAR twice. It represents sources fairly, and in a balanced way. And as a regular target for True Believers who are convinced that it's all a "Darwinian conspiracy" it

401:

So is that silencing of any reasonable opponent your own agenda, or were you simply not aware that is how things work out in the real world? I don't like it, and I won't do it. Will you? Do you? Even if you do, I still win-- because I have not only reason, but I have truth, and where truth has

244:

That I am not willing to tar the ID supporters with the term, "denialism," is in no way a voice of support of the concept of ID as the article suggests at least some hold it. I believe in a 14.5 billion year old universe, evolution, and that dinosaurs lived and became extinct before humans walked

633:

Hmm I thought I posted something yesterday here to the affect of "Yes, it's amazing what impassions people. Hopefully a compromise can be reached, etc." Well, obviously some people just refuse to compromise. I see exactly what is happening with Dr. Margi, but won't elaborate as I don't want to be

565:

I see that DrMargi is now claiming that you are impossible as well! But perhaps I am inadvertaently putting words in her mouth. It's all rather ironic as I have never seen any situation in which anyone has assumed bad faith with opposing suggestions and viewpoints as much as this. Thanks for your

507:

And just to be clear - I have no disagreement with the "creationist" who believes in divine creation. I disagree with the type of creationist who rejects the scientific evidence of evolution...and that has become the dominant usage of the word, even though the other term is far older and far more

1256:

A good reminder that I have an article almost ready to go. The article is an important one with most research completed and entered. A final edit review would be sufficient to make the article go "life" although I would prefer to include more data, and need to update to include Obama's 2011 (I

359:

The other perspectives (from the philosophical to the metaphysical) are relegated to a tiny place in the article which never develops, and from there, the article focuses on the movement-- and that movement is easily dismissed as poppycock by a reasoning mind. Thus the suspicion of an intent to

238:

Answered, there. Implicit in my answer is that we are NOT discussing whether or not ID is a valid hypothesis, but whether those who support the concept, do so because they are in denial. Common sense suggests interpretation of data, authorities and ideological bias is far more likely to be the

681:

Yeah, 420 is the popular number associated with marijuana, and hence the time 4:20 being popular for smoking (i.e. "high" tea). I'm not sure how I ended up doing an undo during my edit. Must have simply hit the wrong link. I never buy bagged tea but it always seems to come my way via gifts from

447:

It's decidedly uncivil to waste people's time by expounding on a subject about which you know almost nothing. You seem to have no hesitation to waste other people's time. It's obvious that you are not a schoolboy - you obviously believe that you know everything and all the rest of us, who have

170:

I also dislike the new practice found outside of Knowledge (XXG) to follow with the Latin abbreviation for "as it was written" , as, "...Texian ... ." Latin editorial abbreviations are not allowed on Knowledge (XXG), and for most readers, the erroneous connotation is taken that the word was

985:

You cast my analogy as "hyperbole," (clearly it was a comparison of situational logic-- not of parties involved). Ot does not matter at all if you thought I was intending a comparison instead of an analogy, you were still wrong, and failed to presume good faith editing on my part-- which it

1017:

Ask yourself-- Do you only allow editors to contribute their opinions on a Talk Page if you are in agreement with them? In which case, you have become the very thing you hate. We call it "Projection" when a person falsely accuses other of the very thing the accuser is doing. That takes

373:

You know as well as I do that tagging it with "denialism" will eventually lead to the mention of those such as Aquinas and Gray being removed as not relevant to the discussion, and so the silencing of the reasonable creationists will have been completed. Right? You know I

532:

The fact remains that Denialism may be appropriate for tagging the article on the movement, but not for the concept of ID. The long history of believing in a Creator and implicitness of ID to be found in nature is unrelated to the movement and its political motives.

467:. They have been promising great breakthroughs for decades, but they have produced almost nothing of substance. They claim ID is science but they have produced no science. They won't publish, but they will travel to churches and mislead people with stuff that they 1048:

You do realize that not only had I been participating in the discussion, but that I started it, right? (And the reason I never responded to your specific claims of bias was because I agree with you that the article has a bias, I just don't agree with you that it

250:

That the Fundamentalists claim one cannot believe in an old universe and evolution and also believe in God is a testament to the shallowness of their faith in comparison to the rich, complex, and (above all), reasonable faith I was offered and took as my

974:

You were not in the discussion on the talk page, had not contributed to it. That discussion asked for editors to consider the use of an offsite article, and so I read the off-site article and discussed my concerns. That is what I am supposed to

1011:

I look your through Talk Page-- including the deleted comments for the last several months-- and this is not like you. I find this as out of character for you as the article was out of character from what I expected from a human rights-based

653:

bag of tea is decorated with scenes from Texas' San Jacinto Battleground-- a blending of my mother's Anglican heritage and my father's Scotch-Irish Texas pioneer heritage: A practical expression of how our American culture works! 4:20? --

178:

But, to remove all instances of Texan and replace them with Texian is edit warring, and we do not want to do that. Several of the effected articles' Talk Pages have included discussions, but in none has a consensus been achieved.

778:

the armed conflicts (wars, rebellions, so on) between Americans and Mexicans, not just the US and Mexico. Besides, the Texas Republic was little more than a US puppet state. I will be adding the template again for said reasons.--

746:

to hippy counterculture. Will that make me an expert qualified to espouse on the American terminology? BTW you may notice teenagers giggling more than usual on the upcoming April 20th, just from the idea that it is "weed day."

1349:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 136:

Other editors have made the changes under the valid argument that such articles ought to be consistent throughout, but again, the changes, so far, have been to remove the word Texan in preference for Texian.

1001:

continued to recast my comments as violations by rephrasing what I wrote to fit your own malevolent characterization of me-- which is offensive. You could have asked my intent-- but you presumed it. Shame.

1023:

I had told you that if you continued, then I would escalate; and so I sent you the very same notice you sent me, and I see you have deleted the notice. Well and good, but you cannot erase your deeds.

1407: 1399: 1221:, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. 1294:, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. 141:

My American Heritage Dictionary, which, the last I heard, is the standard of the English Language in the United States (albeit my copy is abridged) does not even include the word,

855:

Generally in arguments like this, the involved parties know who each other are and the closing admin is going to weigh the arguments rather than the status of the editors.--v/r -

190:

This has been done. The RfC was placed on the Talk Page of the Texas Revolution article because that page already contained the most thorough discussion of all the articles.

1485: 460:

be of the highest standard because even the smallest things get latched upon and debated at length. Again, you'd know that if you bothered to learn a little about the topic.

1521: 133:

in certain eras; but those editors are mistaken. Texan and Texian were used side-by-side during that time, and there is ample evidence to support the use of both.

1028:

While I violated none of the probation items, you have now violated several. Consider your motive-- I know I am, but I cannot make your behavior make sense. --

472:

again. And quite honestly, they don't interest me. So here I am with a decade invested in getting to know all I can about a movement that's not headed anywhere.

1291: 1279: 1218: 1206: 805:

in reference to me? If so, I suggest removing it. My opinion is worth just as much as anyone else whether I've participated on that article or not.--v/r -

167:

ought to be allowed as interchangeable with Texan-- just not to the exclusion of Texan. I believe the burden is upon those who believe otherwise to justify.

342:

Cherry picking: The article is heavily weighted toward the movement and not the concept, and from the comments on Talk, appears to be taken by many to be

257:

discovery as proof of God, but that they do does not require me to presume "denial" as the common root source of their interpretation of the evidence. --

90: 86: 1063:, please focus your posts on the content discussed by other editors and not on things like the motivations of other editors (which is one of the terms.) 123:

In articles related to the History of Texas, including the , there is a history of a few editors changing all uses of the word, "Texan" to "Texian."

452:

it's a matter of what we can reliably source. All this would be clear if you stopped to consider that other people might know something you didn't.

1297:

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

1224:

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

989:

implicitly warned me of attacking a user --with the probation notice comment-- without saying who or how I had attacked (because you could not);

1473: 1465: 26: 1545: 1421: 1374: 932: 1492: 1406:. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more 1512: 1503:. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive 1180: 1104: 54: 920: 591:

of the discussion amuses me. It seems like so little a thing, that I am usually grinning whenever I am corresponding on the matter.

835:

as me, begin our comments, when in response to an RfC that way. You may wish to declare your status as uninvolved for that reason.

1500: 1541: 1417: 1370: 67: 1439: 995:

I had supported my opinion with two specific examples of bias from the off-site article. You addressed none of those; instead

44: 1504: 1488:, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. 928: 1477: 969:

article, as an uninvolved editor, because of an RfC, and read through the Talk Page to get a better idea of the problem.

1361:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

992:

declared I had written my opinion because I disagreed with the source (well, of course!-- that is what an opinion is!);

943:. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. 1366: 601:

gracious. The misuse of the term is ignorance --forgivable ignorance. Unscrupulous, perhaps, in that the hotels may

1496: 879:

And general, because personalities and history are removed from the formula, what UE's bring is often more objective.

281:

I asked you a serious question in good faith. I would have appreciated a less insulting answer. Please remember that

187:

Resolution Noticeboard. An administrator, there, quickly closed that attempt, asking that a RfC be created instead.

152:

None of our spell-checkers on our web browsers or word processors contain the word unless we have manually added it.

935:. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages. 783: 1192: 1059:

to seek review by an uninvolved administrator from an appropriate noticeboard. In the meantime, when posting at

33:'s major revision. A bit outdated, but useful to keep due to significant and frequent vandalism on that article. 709:

just as I type, fresh coffee, wonderful aroma-- not that your 4:20 concept does not have its own temptation! --

1499:. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on 1164:

on Seattle-related Knowledge (XXG) articles with Knowledge (XXG) tutorials and Librarian assistance on hand.

923:

to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed,

37: 1308: 1235: 1068: 950: 1362: 1307:

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

1234:

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

1081: 940: 779: 97:

The above items was closed soon after opening in lieu of the suggested RfC (see next item, below). --

1319: 1246: 1188: 129:

I begin and end with the assumption that such editors firmly believe that the word "Texian" was used

1338: 1329: 980:

You did not comment on any of my concerns. Your reaction was rancorous, and has continued to be so:

1508: 1093: 751: 687: 639: 575: 513: 484: 294: 228: 30: 1520:

If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions

1358: 1342: 1301: 1228: 1060: 282: 1481: 1064: 946: 1354: 1346: 1258: 1029: 880: 859: 836: 822: 809: 710: 654: 613: 537: 536:

There is a page specifically for the movement. The discussion of denialism belongs there.--

416: 258: 199: 98: 50: 1449: 1357:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1350: 286: 1315: 1287: 1242: 1214: 567: 85:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at

1124: 1089: 747: 683: 635: 571: 509: 480: 290: 224: 612:

Now, we shall see if we can, all of us, draw on our own scruples and resolve this! --

476: 1403: 966: 924: 908: 793: 1402:, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the 1392: 954: 812: 856: 819: 806: 448:

actually spent years developing a knowledge of the subject matter, know nothing.

1469: 1154:

Meeting Room 1 on Level 4, Central Library, 1000 4th Avenue, Seattle WA, 98104

558: 570:

and attempts to try to seek reasonable compromise and work toward consensus.

1533: 464: 931:. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at 1537: 1425: 1378: 1323: 1272: 1250: 1196: 1097: 1072: 1043: 1006:

Stop! How many times must I say it? Just stop yourself from such rancor.

894: 862: 850: 825: 787: 755: 724: 691: 668: 643: 627: 579: 551: 517: 488: 430: 298: 272: 232: 213: 112: 605:

misuse the word, conceding to the perceived ignorance of their clientele.

89:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "

1345:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

1292:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for creation/NASA Design Reference (Mars)

1280:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for creation/NASA Design Reference (Mars)

1219:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for creation/NASA Design Reference (Mars)

1207:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for creation/NASA Design Reference (Mars)

1176: 1123: 960:"The best defense is a good offense," I suppose is your rationale. 529:

You are very passionate about this, and taking it personally.

325:

I could have said, "Look, buddy. I am not naive. The article

245:

the earth. I also believe in God, Creator of Heaven and Earth.

1384:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

163:

The preferred term, then, is self-evident, but I admit that

329:

POV Violation, cherry picking, and an agenda to disparage."

1113:

Decemmber 8 - Knowledge (XXG) Loves Libraries Seattle -

801: 223:

I have a question for you on the ID talk page. Thanks.

1151: 1464:

There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of

346:

about the movement. The movement is the silliness.

239:

source of either opposition or support of the idea.

1468:, yet only a fraction of these are represented on 145:. To be fair, it also does not include the word, 59:Archived items from this Talk Page are found here: 1511:or you just want to have fun, all are invited to 1337:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 1495:will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 388:know how dishonest that is from the other side. 40:article was begun here but has since gone live. 907:notification of terms of article probation on 87:Knowledge (XXG):Dispute resolution noticeboard 159:and, by default, lists all instances of both. 8: 818:Ok thanks for taking care of that.--v/r - 1304:of the content if it meets requirements. 1231:of the content if it meets requirements. 1491:In the months of November and December, 1472:in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, 1257:think) near-Earth-asteroid directive.-- 1105:Knowledge (XXG) Loves Libraries Seattle 1398:You are invited to participate in the 1290:. I just wanted to let you know that 1217:. I just wanted to let you know that 27:User:Crews_Giles/ChristianMysticism_1 7: 1447: 1437: 802:Uninvolved editor responding to RfC. 933:Talk:Men's rights/Article probation 402:yet to be discovered, an open mind. 66:March 2011 through February 2012: 55:User:Crews_Giles/After_San_Jacinto 14: 1507:. Whether you want to claim the 1363:review the candidates' statements 1177:http://wll-seattle.eventbrite.com 1448: 1438: 1391: 914: 155:Google search asks if you meant 81:Help with Texan/Texian consensus 68:User talk:Crews Giles/Archive 1 1369:. For the Election committee, 1339:Arbitration Committee election 1330:ArbCom elections are now open! 1314:Thank you for your attention. 1241:Thank you for your attention. 45:User:Crews_Giles/Antonio_Gaona 1: 1379:14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 1273:15:35, 3 September 2013 (UTC) 1251:19:51, 2 September 2013 (UTC) 1098:22:38, 26 November 2012 (UTC) 214:19:01, 27 February 2012 (UTC) 113:00:37, 28 February 2012 (UTC) 1538:23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) 1426:02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC) 1197:03:34, 1 December 2012 (UTC) 126:I am not picking on anyone. 119:Texan or Texian? discussions 1365:and submit your choices on 1170:#wikiloveslib or #glamwiki. 1088:appreciate you saying so, 1563: 1542:MediaWiki message delivery 1418:MediaWiki message delivery 1371:MediaWiki message delivery 1139:Saturday, December 8, 2012 552:15:20, 21 March 2012 (UTC) 518:07:04, 20 March 2012 (UTC) 489:06:20, 20 March 2012 (UTC) 431:03:50, 20 March 2012 (UTC) 299:18:30, 19 March 2012 (UTC) 273:15:17, 19 March 2012 (UTC) 233:06:49, 19 March 2012 (UTC) 1461: 1324:02:00, 6 April 2014 (UTC) 1112: 1073:13:45, 15 July 2012 (UTC) 1044:03:24, 15 July 2012 (UTC) 955:22:04, 14 July 2012 (UTC) 895:01:47, 11 July 2012 (UTC) 863:23:36, 10 July 2012 (UTC) 851:23:10, 10 July 2012 (UTC) 826:20:30, 10 July 2012 (UTC) 813:18:05, 10 July 2012 (UTC) 756:18:57, 6 April 2012 (UTC) 725:18:36, 6 April 2012 (UTC) 692:17:55, 6 April 2012 (UTC) 669:14:27, 6 April 2012 (UTC) 644:12:08, 6 April 2012 (UTC) 628:00:53, 6 April 2012 (UTC) 580:10:54, 5 April 2012 (UTC) 49:Draft of new section for 43:Draft of new article for 1497:2019 US Banknote Contest 1431:2019 US Banknote Contest 1018:introspection to remedy. 788:21:05, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 1493:WikiProject Numismatics 1466:United States banknotes 1457:November-December 2019 463:The "concept" of ID is 91:"Texan" versus "Texian" 38:Yellowstone (steamboat) 1501:all Wikimedia projects 1486:states and territories 1152:Seattle Public Library 1129: 1128:Seattle Public Library 906: 792: 415:Go and do likewise. -- 1343:Arbitration Committee 1181:on-wiki regsistration 1127: 1082:Andrew Jackson Sowell 29:for archived work on 1445:US Banknote Contest 360:disparage is raised. 1347:arbitration process 998:you villainized me, 557:Impossible to have 31:Christian Mysticism 1478:Confederate States 1359:arbitration policy 1130: 921:your contributions 587:Ha! and Yes! The 1529: 1528: 1482:Republic of Texas 1470:Wikimedia Commons 1414: 1413: 1270: 1203: 1202: 1061:Talk:Men's rights 1041: 941:templated message 929:article probation 892: 848: 722: 666: 625: 549: 428: 270: 211: 193:Please go there: 110: 16:The Talk Page... 1554: 1549: 1524: 1474:Colonial America 1452: 1442: 1435: 1434: 1400:50,000 Challenge 1395: 1388: 1387: 1300:You may request 1264: 1261: 1227:You may request 1145:10 a.m. – 3 p.m. 1110: 1109: 1035: 1032: 918: 917: 886: 883: 842: 839: 780:$ 1LENCE D00600D 716: 713: 660: 657: 619: 616: 543: 540: 422: 419: 264: 261: 205: 202: 104: 101: 51:Texas Revolution 20:Notes for others 1562: 1561: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1531: 1519: 1433: 1386: 1367:the voting page 1333: 1284: 1259: 1211: 1189:Maximilianklein 1131: 1108: 1085: 1030: 939:The above is a 915: 912: 881: 837: 797: 775: 711: 655: 614: 568:Talk:Tea (meal) 563: 538: 417: 259: 221: 200: 121: 99: 83: 78: 22: 12: 11: 5: 1560: 1558: 1527: 1526: 1517: 1462: 1459: 1458: 1454: 1453: 1446: 1443: 1432: 1429: 1412: 1411: 1396: 1385: 1382: 1336: 1332: 1327: 1286:Hi there, I'm 1283: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1213:Hi there, I'm 1210: 1204: 1201: 1200: 1185: 1184: 1171: 1165: 1155: 1146: 1140: 1132: 1122: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1115:You're invited 1107: 1102: 1084: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1025: 1024: 1020: 1019: 1014: 1013: 1008: 1007: 1003: 1002: 999: 996: 993: 990: 987: 982: 981: 977: 976: 971: 970: 965:I came to the 962: 961: 937: 936: 919:Thank you for 911: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 897: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 865: 829: 828: 796: 791: 774: 771: 769: 767: 766: 765: 764: 763: 762: 761: 760: 759: 758: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 729: 728: 727: 699: 698: 697: 696: 695: 694: 674: 673: 672: 671: 647: 646: 611: 609: 608: 607: 606: 595: 594: 593: 592: 562: 555: 527: 526: 525: 524: 523: 522: 521: 520: 498: 497: 496: 495: 494: 493: 492: 491: 473: 461: 453: 449: 438: 437: 436: 435: 434: 433: 408: 407: 406: 405: 404: 403: 394: 393: 392: 391: 390: 389: 380: 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 366: 365: 364: 363: 362: 361: 352: 351: 350: 349: 348: 347: 335: 334: 333: 332: 331: 330: 318: 317: 316: 315: 314: 313: 304: 303: 302: 301: 276: 275: 253: 252: 247: 246: 241: 240: 220: 217: 161: 160: 153: 150: 120: 117: 116: 115: 93:". Thank you. 82: 79: 77: 74: 73: 72: 71: 70: 61: 60: 57: 47: 41: 34: 21: 18: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1559: 1550: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1525: 1523: 1516: 1514: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1494: 1489: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1460: 1456: 1455: 1451: 1444: 1441: 1436: 1430: 1428: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1409: 1405: 1404:United States 1401: 1397: 1394: 1390: 1389: 1383: 1381: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1331: 1328: 1326: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1312: 1310: 1309:WP:REFUND/G13 1305: 1303: 1298: 1295: 1293: 1289: 1281: 1278: 1274: 1271: 1268: 1262: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1239: 1237: 1236:WP:REFUND/G13 1232: 1230: 1225: 1222: 1220: 1216: 1208: 1205: 1199: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1182: 1178: 1175: 1172: 1169: 1166: 1163: 1159: 1156: 1153: 1150: 1147: 1144: 1141: 1138: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1126: 1121: 1120: 1116: 1111: 1106: 1103: 1101: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1083: 1080: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1042: 1039: 1033: 1027: 1026: 1022: 1021: 1016: 1015: 1012:organization. 1010: 1009: 1005: 1004: 1000: 997: 994: 991: 988: 984: 983: 979: 978: 973: 972: 968: 964: 963: 959: 958: 957: 956: 952: 948: 944: 942: 934: 930: 926: 922: 910: 896: 893: 890: 884: 878: 877: 876: 875: 874: 873: 872: 871: 864: 861: 858: 854: 853: 852: 849: 846: 840: 833: 832: 831: 830: 827: 824: 821: 817: 816: 815: 814: 811: 808: 804: 803: 795: 790: 789: 785: 781: 772: 770: 757: 753: 749: 744: 743: 742: 741: 740: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 726: 723: 720: 714: 707: 706: 705: 704: 703: 702: 701: 700: 693: 689: 685: 680: 679: 678: 677: 676: 675: 670: 667: 664: 658: 651: 650: 649: 648: 645: 641: 637: 632: 631: 630: 629: 626: 623: 617: 604: 603:intentionally 599: 598: 597: 596: 590: 586: 585: 584: 583: 582: 581: 577: 573: 569: 560: 556: 554: 553: 550: 547: 541: 534: 530: 519: 515: 511: 506: 505: 504: 503: 502: 501: 500: 499: 490: 486: 482: 478: 474: 470: 466: 462: 459: 454: 450: 446: 445: 444: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 432: 429: 426: 420: 414: 413: 412: 411: 410: 409: 400: 399: 398: 397: 396: 395: 386: 385: 384: 383: 382: 381: 372: 371: 370: 369: 368: 367: 358: 357: 356: 355: 354: 353: 345: 341: 340: 339: 338: 337: 336: 328: 324: 323: 322: 321: 320: 319: 310: 309: 308: 307: 306: 305: 300: 296: 292: 288: 284: 280: 279: 278: 277: 274: 271: 268: 262: 255: 254: 249: 248: 243: 242: 237: 236: 235: 234: 230: 226: 218: 216: 215: 212: 209: 203: 196: 194: 191: 188: 184: 180: 176: 174: 168: 166: 158: 154: 151: 148: 144: 140: 139: 138: 134: 132: 127: 124: 118: 114: 111: 108: 102: 96: 95: 94: 92: 88: 80: 75: 69: 65: 64: 63: 62: 58: 56: 52: 48: 46: 42: 39: 35: 32: 28: 24: 23: 19: 17: 1530: 1518: 1490: 1463: 1415: 1334: 1313: 1306: 1302:Userfication 1299: 1296: 1285: 1266: 1263: 1240: 1233: 1229:Userfication 1226: 1223: 1212: 1186: 1174:Registration 1173: 1167: 1161: 1157: 1148: 1142: 1136: 1114: 1086: 1065:Kevin Gorman 1037: 1034: 967:Men's Rights 947:Kevin Gorman 938: 925:Men's rights 913: 909:Men's rights 888: 885: 844: 841: 800: 798: 794:Men's Rights 776: 768: 718: 715: 662: 659: 621: 618: 610: 602: 588: 564: 545: 542: 535: 531: 528: 468: 457: 424: 421: 343: 326: 289:are policy. 266: 263: 222: 207: 204: 197: 192: 189: 185: 181: 177: 172: 169: 164: 162: 156: 146: 142: 135: 130: 128: 125: 122: 106: 103: 84: 15: 1513:participate 1484:, multiple 773:Big problem 479:be damned. 183:by others. 131:exclusively 1355:topic bans 1316:HasteurBot 1288:HasteurBot 1243:HasteurBot 1215:HasteurBot 173:misspelled 1509:Gold Wiki 1351:site bans 1162:editathon 1090:DLS Texas 1049:matters.) 748:Njsustain 684:Njsustain 636:Njsustain 572:Njsustain 566:input at 510:Guettarda 481:Guettarda 465:vaporware 291:Guettarda 225:Guettarda 219:Denialism 53:Section: 1532:Sent by 1149:Location 927:, is on 327:screams' 283:WP:CIVIL 76:The Talk 1282:concern 1209:concern 1187:Yours, 1179:or use 1168:Hashtag 589:passion 312:must I? 1505:awards 1480:, the 1476:, the 1341:. The 1260:cregil 1031:cregil 882:cregil 838:cregil 712:cregil 656:cregil 615:cregil 539:cregil 418:cregil 287:WP:NPA 260:cregil 201:cregil 165:Texian 143:Texian 100:cregil 1158:Event 157:Texan 147:Texan 1546:talk 1540:via 1534:ZLEA 1522:here 1422:talk 1408:here 1375:talk 1320:talk 1267:talk 1247:talk 1193:talk 1143:Time 1137:Date 1100:Dan 1094:talk 1069:talk 1038:talk 986:was; 951:talk 889:talk 845:talk 784:talk 752:talk 719:talk 688:talk 663:talk 640:talk 622:talk 576:talk 561:with 546:talk 514:talk 485:talk 477:WP:V 469:know 458:must 425:talk 344:only 295:talk 285:and 267:talk 251:own. 229:talk 208:talk 107:talk 36:The 25:See 1536:at 1335:Hi, 1160:An 975:do. 945:-- 799:Is 559:tea 374:am. 1515:. 1424:) 1416:-- 1410:! 1377:) 1353:, 1322:) 1311:. 1249:) 1238:. 1195:) 1096:) 1071:) 953:) 786:) 754:) 690:) 642:) 578:) 516:) 487:) 297:) 231:) 198:-- 195:] 175:. 1548:) 1544:( 1420:( 1373:( 1318:( 1269:) 1265:( 1245:( 1191:( 1183:. 1092:( 1067:( 1040:) 1036:( 949:( 891:) 887:( 860:P 857:T 847:) 843:( 823:P 820:T 810:P 807:T 782:( 750:( 721:) 717:( 686:( 665:) 661:( 638:( 624:) 620:( 574:( 548:) 544:( 512:( 483:( 427:) 423:( 293:( 269:) 265:( 227:( 210:) 206:( 149:. 109:) 105:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index