User talk:Crispulop/Archive 1

2372:-You suggested I drop the "501(c)(3)" modifier, but I believe it's an important distinction that defines the group's operation and membership. However, I only use it in the first instance and I've added a wikilink to provide clarification. -A.M. Best reference. I was able to locate the listing on the AM Best site as well as the AMB number (011845) but I can't provide a direct link to the rating, as it is password protected. So I replaced it with a new reference, an article published at the time. -History section. I've added the following references to provide more direct verification (footnotes 5,7,8 which have now changed numerically): Charles Temper, “When will your insurance be cancelled?” Nonprofit Times, July 1989 James Mitchell, “Non-profits get a savior on insurance.” San Jose Mercury News, August 13, 2000 “Nonprofit organizations grapple with the vagaries of liability insurance.” Wall Street Journal, June 22, 1989. -Promotional tone. I have tried to eliminate all hints of promotional language, removing such words as "successful" and "actively." I wasn't sure about retaining the sentence about the group's slogan, so I inserted a question mark. -I added an Infobox. 122:

first added that part. I had to rush away at one point so I had not added a source for his arrest yet. And I've still not be able to find a source. It look's like almost all information of his mere existence has vanished from the Internet. The only thing I can find about him is this article on RTL So we might have to change his information in the list from two counts of manslaughter to two counts of attempted manslaughter or grave assault or something like that. But I have no more information about his arrest, so it's probably not verifiable, your choice to delete it or not. Should we add sources for every arrest? It's probably do-able but hard to find original sources in English. Anyway, it's hard to find good information about most people on the list. I seem to remember that Sharif was Egyptian and Chaudhry from Pakistan. But I can't find any sources for that either. Your YouTube source for Rida Bennajem doesn't work anymore by the way. Greetings, Crispulop

1123:

careful with them and that they should be used sparsely or avoided altogether as they are not your own words and disrupt the text flow. I understand that in this article's case they can't be avoided, and I'm glad you managed to diminish some of them. I am very willing to pass your nomination as it is, but I'm afraid the hook is a bit dull at the moment. I suppose you are in favor of a political solution in Syria and thus not want to link your hook to the 2013 Ghouta attacks, but something like that might be able to spice it up a bit. If you would like to keep it as it is that is fine as well, just let me know and I'll give you the DYK tick.

1093:. We seem to be at the odd moment of history where one Western parliament has rejected the use of bombs and another is being asked for "authorization", but the Western mainstream media/political class (even prominent anti-war commentary that I've seen) continue to say almost nothing about the third main alternative (first = "do nothing" = continue the weapons flow, second = bomb a little or bomb a lot), even though as the international system's closest thing to an NPOV representative on the issue, Lakhdar Brahimi, says, "all wars end with a political solution of some sort". 88:' article. Thank you very much for that. I just have a question tho. I see you added 'Arrested in Germany' at Bao Zhuo Chen. Can i ask what is your source for this information? I searched a long time for information about Bao Zhuo Chen but found, except for the website of the Nationale Opsporingslijst and the televisionprogram Opsporing Verzocht, nothing about him. So i am very curious what is the source of that information. Also do you have a date of his arrest? That would complete the list. Thanks in advance. Greetings, 3063:

Please be more alert in future!, "stomped on", "misinterpreted the history and then proceeded to go about things in a way sure to mislead others and offend me" Your reactions are way out proportion. It seems you are taking this all way too seriously. I've been simply fixing a Knowledge (XXG) error, which for you unfortunately for you showed up on your talk page. It would have been fine just to remove that one message from your talkpage rather then starting this conversation up in a negative way.

1606:

instant messengers for the average person and hence no comparison between good and poor designs with track histories to point to. At the same time I don't want to be a newspaper headline claiming to have invented some concept either. Therefore I will endeavor to find references for the statements I make that are from long study on the matter of cryptographically secure systems (as opposed to algorithm studies) and refrain from the geeky math that sometimes such systems are described with.

2000:"Nonprofits Insurance Alliance Group (NIA Group), based in Santa Cruz, CA and Barre, Vermont is a group of cooperative nonprofit insurance organizations which provide liability and property insurance for 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations in 31 states and DC. In the year ending 2012, the NIA Group insured 11,804 nonprofits nationwide, had a total equity of $ 163.1 million, with $ 331.3 million in assets, and was rated A VIII (Excellent) by A.M. Best Company. " 132: 2265:

using APSE's newsletter theAdvance as a reference. Actually I wrote the article using interviews that I conducted and then backed them up with theAdvance and other articles as references. So what does it take to get a Knowledge (XXG) page similar to TASH's completed? Can we take the overview/first paragraph that I wrote for the Knowledge (XXG) page and then have the link to our "about us" page? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

31: 2827: 1684: 1341: 1254: 1167: 473: 218: 2780:: "However, copying material without the permission of the copyright holder from sources that are not public domain or compatibly licensed (unless it's a brief quotation used in accordance with Knowledge (XXG)'s non-free content policy and guideline) is likely to be a copyright violation." 90% of the candidates section is currently directly copied from your source, it is thus a copyright violation. 3001:

another article submission was created at Afc (which is the one I declined now). You got a message saying the article submission was declined as a courtesy. I did not expect that something had gone wrong in the past. Furthermore, you are ofcourse free to delete the declined Afc message on your talkpage. As well as the talkback template which I posted to show you this message.

177: 2522: 2598: 1804: 579: 288: 2034:

rating by A.M. Best in the intro, you also provided a source for that information (the A.M. Best website), however the link you provide needs to be more direct. So it must directly link to a page which says that Nonprofit Insurance Alliance Group has such a rating. Confusingly, I also don't see the type of rating (A VIII) on the Knowledge (XXG) page on

1138:

Ghouta attacks as context. The only difficult thing is that the consensus title for the article does not yet say "chemical weapons", so adding that now could be considered either OR or overriding the present editorial consensus - I don't see any point waiting a week or so for a consensus title change for the Ghouta attacks article. Anyway, see ALT2.

2284:. Although that article seems neutral in tone it could still be up for deletion at any time because it is not adequatly supported by reliable sources that establish it's notability (it only has references to the TASH website). So, I am afraid that is not the way to go. Furthermore, I would like to point out the page 3139:

pages however none of them are particularly detailed (hence my creating this page). I am unclear what additional sources I can provide as even these in-country pages are very weak in references. If you are unable to approve m,y page for publication I would appreciate any advice you can offer how to proceed

3025:

It's like your graduation photo on your mother's wall and someone came along and wrote "FRAUD" on it. Understand? On my talk page a reader might have thought you were calling me a liar because your message contradicted the previous one. That's why I am annoyed. You misinterpreted the history and then

3000:

Hi, I have no idea why you are reacting so annoyed, it's unnecessary and unhelpful. I looked into the history of the Afc which I declined and to the existing article, it looks like something went wrong when it was promoted to mainspace. The article you started in your userspace went to mainspace, and

2794:

The election campaign obviously didn't start with the 27 candidates but it will start now with the 10 candidates so it's completely useless to mix those names with those who are actually in the race, will just create confusion. Some of the disqualified people don't even have Wiki article. You may add

2198:

I am still willing to help you out on the article. If you implement the change as discussed we'll see what we can do from there. Please also provide more direct links for references numbers 5,7,8. I also suggest creating wikilinks (internal links) to relevant subjects in your text, such as A.M. Best.

1648:

You can't have sections named Conclusion and to a lesser extent Overview. I would suggest a sectioned head as: "Qualities of Secure Instant Messaging networks" or even "Qualities". Under which you can type a list of all the qualities that a Secure Instant Messaging network requires. If possible it is

1622:

Hello Stassio, I think the subject of your article is valid. Secure Instant Messaging validates an article of it's own. I nominated the PROD (article's for Proposed deletion) because of the form it is written. I understand that you come from a research-background and this is the logical form to write

3169:

Hi Adamprince, it seems like you have provided some sources now. You also submitted it again, so someone else will look at it. I must warn you that citing an other language Knowledge (XXG) will not count as a reliable source, you can however use the sources used by those other Wikipedias. Good luck!

2264:

After discussing things with others within the APSE organization, it has been decided that we would like to pursue a Knowledge (XXG) page similar to the one that was done for the TASH organization with a link to our about us page. This is until we can find outside resources that back up what I wrote

2246:

After I re-read your text I noticed that the great majority of your sources is "TheAdvance". I am not sure what that is. If it is the journal of the ASPSE then it does not count as a reliable, independent source. Other ASPE material and Knowledge (XXG) itself also don't count as reliable sources. So

1122:

I have a keen interest in International Relations and the Middle East, though for some reason I have never worked on any article related to it on Knowledge (XXG) yet. Your article seems like a nice start to change that. I mentioned your use of quotations because in university I was taught to be very

770:

Thanks for your explanation. The reason I first queried you was because you had advised the author it was an AfD. As an aside, the issue I have with the speedy delete process is articles can be deleted by an administrator with no knowledge of the particular area. Allowing an AfD process for articles

3138:

Hello, You kindly reviewed my submission on Storno and rejected it due to lack of sources. The challenge is that I am describing an accounting concept not used by the English speaking/western accounting world. I have provided additional references to the German, Russian and Polish Knowledge (XXG)

2950:

The history section is now very well referenced, good job. The same goes for the infobox, good job. I've removed the slogan as it does not contribute much to the article and it always comes of as promotional if a slogan is seen in the general text. I've made some further small edits. The main thing

743:

form of significance (not to mention the self-promotion which you correctly mention), therefore he speedily deleted it. Because it lacked any significance whatsoever the article did not need to go to either a PROD or Afd procedure in which your community of NZ authors could have shown input. To me,

711:

The only problem with that is that it did not give the NZ project a chance to review it, because of the speed the article was deleted. I recall having some concerns with the article as it appeared to be self-promotional, but it would have been useful to be able to confer with the wider NZ community

2221:

You reviewed my submission on APSE: Association of People Supporting Employment First and it was denied due to it not being formal. I can understand removing the opening phrase "What is APSE?" But I am confused by anything else not being formal. In the initial overview paragraph as you state I did

657:

Hi, thanks for picking up one of the ideas on the Requested Articles page. I asked for Slaughterhouse to be deleted because in the article you wrote I saw no indication of importance/notability. If I remember correctly, the article stated: Slaughterhouse is a band. It's members are:.. So there was

1423:

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Monex Capital for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag

425:

What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I

121:

a good source of information for others. I see that you are the one that already made most of this page. Good job on that! I had the same problem with Bao Zhuo Chen as you have: a lack of information. I remembered from one of the episodes of Opsporing Verzocht that he was arrested in Germany so I

3062:

You're making this as if I'm making this a personal attack on you, which it is absolutely not. I'm fixing a Knowledge (XXG) error here. Meanwhile you're using excessive terms against me and in general, which I reject. Saying "cluttered" for one post, "long since superceded" (two weeks you mean),

2675:

Thanks for your careful review of my recent submission re: Traxpay. You mentioned that the reason for rejection was due to the article having copyrighted information in there. Can you tell me what it is that is raising the red flag? I have reread the article and do not see where there may be

2186:

I found the document by Googling random sections of the text you provided at Articles for creation. I looked at your site and found that you do paid content development work. You are ofcourse free to post whatever you want on your own site. Noting that you wrote this article as volunteer work, I

1137:

My preferences for what should be done in Syria are irrelevant, from a Knowledge (XXG) POV. From a DYK POV, adding the Ghouta attacks for attracting readers+editors seems justified to me; from the Knowledge (XXG) POV, which is biased in favour of NPOV, I think it's also reasonable to include the

965:

be notable, however the page on him must be neutral and thus free of any promotion. The text on him may also not be copied from other websites. The current text was not neutral and copied from other websites, that is why I nominated it for a Speedy deletion. If you write the text in your own and

2941:

You're absolutely right. I'm sorry, I forgot about it. Regarding your earlier comments/improvements which you posted on my talk page on 14 October. It is now clear for me that you want to include the 501(c)(3) text, that's ok, I improved the exact wikilink for you. I'll asume good faith on the

2772:

I'm afraid you're not getting the point I'm trying to make. I wish to say that just because the candidates have been disqualified that does not mean they should not be mentioned in the article. The article should show which candidates are currently still in the race, and the ones that have been

2033:

Hi Researcher899, I am ofcourse willing to help you out. Regarding the intro, it is quite good already. I would suggest cutting out the term: "501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations" througout the article and substituting it with just nonprofit organizations. In my opinion you may mention the credit

1605:

Hi Crispulop. Found your recommendation on my article. While I do not necessarily disagree with a strict comparison of essay and article I want to see if I can further research the topic and shift more to the article classification. Part of the challenge is that there simply is no viable secure

433:

data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide

3379:

Hi TedTheTurbot, maybe I have looked a bit too fast over your sources. They do seem credible, however the first one Burton Mail does not seem to be working (at least at the moment for me). I suggest you resubmit your article and someone else will look at it. It might however be wise to provide

2149:

Hi Crispulop, I do volunteer work for nonprofits in my community as well as paid content development work. I posted the WIKIPEDIA article in my portfolio to demonstrate the various styles I can write in. I should have indicated that the article was a submission--subject to Knowledge (XXG)'s

2427:

Thank you for reviewing my new article about Primacy Management. I wasn't aware that using a description that I have sourced is copy infringement. However, I am determined to work on and complete this submission. Can you provide me any further advice or comments regarding my first article?

2222:

say a "select few", but in the main body I do identify these individuals. Everyone is first introduced by both their first and last names. If there are any other instances that you could help point out that do not follow the theme of Knowledge (XXG) I would appreciate the help. Thank you.

102:

EDIT: I just noticed that one change is a mistake. You changed the and total days of Sijahailatua. The days you entered are correct, however i made a mistake before about the off-date. Sajahailutua has been arrested on 9th of November, not 25th of October. So my fault. I corrected it. -

1992:

You commented that the opening paragraph "comes across as promotional." Also you stated that the tone should be more formal. I would appreciate if you could clarify both of those comments so I can improve the article. (Since writing it I have also obtained article citations.)

1996:

The statements given in the opening paragraph (see below) are factual; help me to understand why you view them as promotional. I was careful not to use any 'peacock' terms. Should I omit mentioning the independent rating by A.M. Best Company? Or put it in a different place?

442:, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the 414:

I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).

915:

The content on this page is purely to create public awareness and visibility for a privately held cancer care network in South Asia. Its sole purpose is to reach out to cancer patients across the world and Knowledge (XXG) seemed like the best platform for the same.

3278:

Hi Amandaelfering, I'm afraid the general tone of the article is the problem, it's advertising in tone. The whole article seems to scream: look at how great the sandals are! The sourcing however is good, notability is established, good job on that. Please see

2559:

Specifically, the statement "the only Nokia Concept Store in all of Sub-Saharan Africa" is a credible assertion of significance -- enough to avoid A7 deletion at any rate. If you feel the company isn't notable, please PROD it or nominate the article at AfD.

662:

if you would like more information on notability of bands. If you think Slaughterhouse is notable you are of course free to re-create the article. Just include the notability information in the article and everything is fine. I hoped I helped you out here.

3021:

and accordingly the page was promoted to mainspace (perhaps with some minor tidying up by someone else) So that FoCuSandLeArN's note on my talk page was a source of pride for me, which you stomped on with your message directly afterwards contradicting it.

2951:

for you to improve is to provide some referencing for the sections Mission, Organizational structure, Current Operations. The section current operations looks more like an area of current operations to me at the moment, you might be able to improve that.

692:

Hello ..., I nominated the article for a Speedy Deletion, A7, no indication of importance, as the article did not make any assertion why it was important, let alone notable. And an administrator apparently agreed with me and deleted the article.

734:

I don't think I have to explain this to you because you seem to be an experienced editor, but I do so anyways because you don't seem to understand the point I'm trying to make: If an article is nominated for a speedy deletion an

809:. It mentions speedy deletion twice (once in the title and once in the text). However, I agree with you that the message posted by Page Curation isn't as clear as the template that can be manually copied from any CSD template. 1090: 3257:

on October 31. I attempted to use newspapers with circulations of over 200,000, and reliable sources both online and offline. Do you have advice on how I can improve the listing so that it meets your criteria? Thank you.

2754:

before re-adding names of people who were already disqualified and banned from running. Also, quoting partial text is not copyright infringement, unless the source explicitly states that no one can use any part of its

996:

to AfD. The copyright notice on the source it was copied from is sufficiently ambiguous that I didn't feel comfortable with a straight speed deletion, and concluded a deletion discussion is the better way to go.

3016:

Nothing went wrong until you intervened. I drafted the article then I submitted it to Articles for creation and as you can see in the entry in my talk page left by FoCuSandLeArN my submission was accepted

2712:

Hi Davtrax, this article has been deleted over three weeks ago. So I might not be able to remember correctly. From what I can see in the deletion log is that the page you created mirror this link closely:

1933:

I created an article International Fluid Power Society. I did not use any copyrighted material except in the Reference area where I stated a book, page number etc. My article was denied. ````MeyerKayser

242: 190: 2129:

context. In that area you can get feedback and make sure that your article is acceptable to Knowledge (XXG). If you follow the wikilink I provided you in this section you can get instructions there.

1903:

Hi Tratilai, the main reason I rejected the article was that it consists of external links (so to other websites than Knowledge (XXG)) rather than internal links, which is the case in the article

2798:

That 90% of text is the candidates place of birth, father's name, school's name, his job title, and etc. So don't worry about it but if it bothers you then I'll simply change the text around.--

1623:

in for you. I hope you are able to rewrite about your subject in a more "article-type-style". I also hope you found the link about writing essays in the PROD message, otherwise you can find it

2465:, and that it has been declined as the notability of the organisation or company is not yet established. If you follow the link that is provided in the declining message (you can also find it 919:

HCG provides treatment at 20-30% of the cost incurred as compared to the Developed Countries. Being the largest cancer care network, it is of apt requirement to be a part of the Wiki world.

2239:

I am ofcourse willing to help you out, but before I let you go through the trouble of improving your text please make sure that your subject is notable. For what is notable, please look at:

3339:. I read the guidelines on notability before submission and I feel the references I chose satisfy these; I would be grateful if you could provide me with some additional guidance on this. 2721:, which constitutes blantant advertising. I also see that your username is Davtrax, which makes me to guess that you are David Desharnais of Traxpay. I therefore wish to advise you to read 2498: 1722: 1568: 1205: 1660:

If you are able to improve the article text I'll further gladly help you by giving it a more Knowledge (XXG) style look. If you have gotten any more questions don't hesitate to ask.

771:

that are tagged with a project interest gives time for the projects members to consider if the article has merit. Surely this is something that is beneficial to the wider community.

1962:

The information you provided was for 90% the same as on the organization website, that constitutes a copyright violation and that will lead to the article being deleted. Please see

511: 2288:, as your organization is trying to establish itself on Knowledge (XXG), however noble its goals may be. Your interviews won't count as a reliable source either as they count as 2496:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 2466: 2240: 2795:

a seperate section at the bottom and list the people who were disqualifed, that's if you really want but again it's useless information because they were legally disqualified.

3356:

The references' article length would seem to satisfy the in-depth aspect (none of which is advertorial), and they are also neutral, independent and reputable publications.

2533:, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the 2980:

So you by "rejecting" my previously successful submission just cluttered up my talk page with old, out of date info long since superceded. Please be more alert in future!

638:

Hey Crispulop. I grabbed Slaughterhouse from the Requested Articles page. I am fine if you want to delete the article, I just wanted to clear up that it wasn't my idea.

422:

on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.

3346:

The Burton Mail – the regional newspaper for the town of Burton upon Trent and district, daily (paper copy) circulation 12,200 plus website. Article length 250 words.

2861: 2905:

Hi Crispulop, As it's been a couple weeks, I wanted to check in with you regarding the changes I posted in mid-October. I look forward to your review and comments.

1292: 1089:

I was glad to help with the Dolfinarium :). Since you seem to be interested in international relations, you might want to consider checking my own DYK nomination:

435: 2243:. The main rule is: An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. 1904: 1049: 149: 2983:

I'm deleting any edits you caused to my page and if it is appropriate to delete that project page I gave the link for then I will leave that up to others to do.

1908: 3195:

Is a person that speaks to crowds of over 50,000 people regularly notable? Are newspapers from latinamerica a good source? How about photos and press releases?

2942:

A-excellent rating, if you are somehow capable of providing a more current (as 2005 is alread 8 years ago!)/better reference that would be greatly appreciated.

2156:

Thank you for your helpful suggestions. I have found the article which publishes AM Best's A rating which I will add to references, as well as add the Infobox.

1379: 739:

reviews the request. In this case an administrator agreed that Thomson Whisky did not deserve a place on Knowledge (XXG) in it's current form because it lacked

1876:

by reason "Knowledge (XXG) is not a mere collection of external links or Internet directories." I understand that but I did the page exactly like similar page

1045: 3108: 2339: 1059: 744:

you are coming across as feeling entitled to being heard because you are part of the WikiProject NZ, while CSD deletions are simply administrator business.

3047:

good. That's why it was promoted to mainspace by FoCuSandLeArN. I'm saying that an error occurred when it was promoted to mainspace and that created a

925:

Along with 20-30% reduction, we also have a Foundation which works as an independent social arm to help patients avail free and subsidised treatment.

3352:

AccredIT UK – part of the (UK Government) Department of Trade and Industry, responsible for IT standards and certification. Article length 680 words.

3349:

Logistics Manager – one of two pre-eminent UK logistics magazines, monthly (paper copy) circulation 11,700 plus website. Article length 1,270 words.

2088:

Thank you for your message. I am re-writing the whole text of the Banque Internationale à Luxembourg SA page. I will erase all promotional content.

907: 3432: 2462: 1424:

from the top. You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Crispulop (talk) 16:10, 7 September 2013 (UTC) Why is it inappropriate?

2369:

Hi Crispulop, I have made the following changes to the Nonprofits Alliance article. I have not resubmitted it, pending your review and comments.

1873: 3098: 3192:

Hi Crispulop you cited not "notable and worthy of inclusion" on /J.A._Pérez You also said: "Has he been awarded any major prizes for example?"

3055:. I noticed that the duplicate submission was the same as your previous submission which had been promoted to mainspace. So the outcome of the 2503: 439: 3104: 2335: 1055: 3094: 2908: 2329: 3316: 1431: 3336: 3280: 3227:

Hi, newspapers from Latin America would be a good source yes. Photos and press releases on the other hand would not be a good source. See

2972: 2776:

Your "partial text" definition of quotes compromises who blocks of texts and therefore does constitute a copyright violation. I cite from

3210: 2929: 2391: 2325: 2175: 2022: 944: 2748: 2948:

Even though press releases are normally not considered to be authoritive info, this one will do to assert for the rating of NIA Group

2126: 615:

professor in the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador and the ]. She also worked shorter periods for [[Universidad Tecnológica

443: 3404:

Hi Crispulop, thanks for looking at this again. I will make the changes you suggest regarding additional referencing and resubmit.

2113: 1950: 1448:

Hi, the message you saw/received on a/your talk page was sent by a bot after I nominated the article speedy deletion under criteria

2777: 2722: 2554: 2289: 2285: 1963: 426:

find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.

117:

Answer to Scarafax: Hello Scarafax. I enjoyed helping you out there as far as I was correct. I hope we can partner up and make the

1630:

I have no knowledge of Secure Instant Messaging, however, I may have some first suggestions on ways on how to improve the article.

805:. I must inform you that the message you see there is a message automatically posted by nominating a page for Speedy deletion via 3158: 2447: 1506: 1585: 1540: 3342:

Your comments talk of the need for in-depth, neutral, independent sources, which I feel the article has. The references are:

3101:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2332:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2199:

For the intro I would also add that the NIA Group is from the United States, since the Knowledge (XXG) audience is worldwide.

1052:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3231:

for further information. The link you provided would not serve as a neutral, reliable source as it is related to the author.

2880: