Knowledge talk:WikiProject Mathematics/PlanetMath Exchange

2766:){ if (/Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics\/PlanetMath Exchange\/(.*)/){ $ title= "|]\n"; } if (/Status:/) { if (/Needs to be copied/){ ++$ a;} elsif (/Copied/){ ++$ b;} elsif (/Needs to be merged/){ ++$ c;} elsif (/Merged/){ ++$ d;} elsif (/WP article adequate/){ ++$ e;} elsif (/WP article more complete/){ ++$ f;} elsif (/Not needed on WP/){ ++$ g;} else {++$ h;} # not reviewed ++$ i; } } $ j=$ i-$ h; $ done=$ b+$ d+$ e+$ f+$ g; if ($ h==$ i){ #not started $ istyle= "|- \n"; } elsif ($ h+$ b+$ a==0){ #completed FFFFCC $ istyle= "|- bgcolor=#FFFFCC \n"; } elsif ($ h==0){ #all reviewed E6E6AA $ istyle= "|- bgcolor=#E6E6AA \n"; } else { #Started FFFFCC $ istyle= "|- bgcolor=#FFFFCC \n"; } print $ istyle; print $ title; print "| $ i || $ j || $ b || $ d || $ e || $ f || $ g || $ a || $ c\n"; print "|~~~~\n"; 2485:){ if (/Status:/) { if (/Needs to be copied/){ ++$ a;} elsif (/Copied/){ ++$ b;} elsif (/Needs to be merged/){ ++$ b;} elsif (/Merged/){ ++$ d;} elsif (/WP article adequate/){ ++$ e;} elsif (/WP article more complete/){ ++$ f;} elsif (/Not needed on WP/){ ++$ g;} else {++$ h;} ++$ i; } } $ j=$ i-$ h; print "::Total articles: $ i\n"; print "::Reviewed articles: $ j\n"; print "::Copied: $ b\n"; print "::Merged: $ d\n"; print "::WP article adequate: $ e\n"; print "::WP article more complete: $ f\n"; print "::Not needed on WP: $ g\n"; /**/print "::'''Needs to be merged''': $ c\n";/**/ /**/print "::'''Needs to be copied''': $ a\n";/**/ /**/print "::'''Needs to be reviewed''': $ h\n";/**/ /**/print ":::~~~~\n";/**/ 2675:){ if (/Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics\/PlanetMath Exchange\/(.*)/){ print "|]\n"; } if (/Status:/) { if (/Needs to be copied/){ ++$ a;} elsif (/Copied/){ ++$ b;} elsif (/Needs to be merged/){ ++$ b;} elsif (/Merged/){ ++$ d;} elsif (/WP article adequate/){ ++$ e;} elsif (/WP article more complete/){ ++$ f;} elsif (/Not needed on WP/){ ++$ g;} else {++$ h;} ++$ i; } } $ j=$ i-$ h; $ done=$ b+$ d+$ e+$ f+$ g; $ red=sprintf ("%2.X", 255*($ i-$ done)/$ i ); $ green=sprintf ("%2.X", 255*$ done/$ i ); $ red =~ tr/ /0/; $ green =~ tr/ /0/; $ istyle= "! style=\"background:#".$ red.$ green."00\" "; print "$ istyle | $ i || $ j || $ b || $ d || $ e || $ f || $ g || $ c || $ a\n"; print "|~~~~\n"; 2858:

elsif ($ status =~ /copied/i ){ ++$ b;} # copied already elsif ($ status =~ /need/i && $ status =~ /merged/i) { ++$ c;} # needs merging elsif ($ status =~ /merged/i ){ ++$ d;} # merged already elsif ($ status =~ /adequate/i ){ ++$ e;} # wp is good enough elsif ($ status =~ /complete/i ){ ++$ f;} # wp more complete elsif ($ status =~ /not/i && $ status =~ /needed/i ){ ++$ g;} # not needed elsif ($ status =~ /^\s*$ /) {++$ h;} # empty status, that is not reviewd else {print "Huston, we have a problem. The status line is incomprehensible\n"}; ++$ i;

4714:

PlanetMath as a source of articles is a good thing... but I'm also interested in exploring other possible collaborations between Knowledge and PM. For example, code, finances, lobbying -- as the need may arise. In the long term, I'm anticipating that PlanetMath will just be one of several "Planets" devoted to technical content; getting some thoughts from Knowledge people about how to approach this sort of growth would be a good thing. My initial thought is that PM and subsequent Planets could become the "micropedia" to Knowledge's "macropedia", but that's a very abstract idea. --Joe Corneli

3547:

Perhaps if we are going to use mathbot exclusively to update the table, we could bring him down a notch or two, by dispensing with that column all together? Or perhaps we will need it for the occasional human intervention? Oh and having a link under the table to make Mathbot count on command sounds great! We should label it: "Go boy! Count!". I am having fun now imagining repeatedly commanding him to count over and over and over again until his little brain melts ;-) Oh yeah and tell Mathbot to lose the "XX"s.

204: 194: 176: 145: 3369:. I don't see why though, we can't have our cake and eat it too ;-) Couldn't we, for example just include any proofs, which are not suitable for expository reasons, on the article's talk page? But, this is a discussion for a wider audience, for the purposes of this project, I think I see some value in marking in some way PM articles which contain proofs which have not been copied to WP. 2926:, because it was so long (396 entries) with so many sections that I felt like I needed some way to keep track of where I was, and what was left to do. If they could be automatically updated that would be great. If not just leaving them there to be updated manually would be fine too. As Regards the Duplicate's I've never found them of any use. 3881:

actually look at the project page every day? I just find it odd that Mathbot updates so often when no one other than me is reviewing articles. not to mention it does make something of a mess of the history page. Of course, this isn't a big deal, but it seems like the sort of thing that should be easy to fix.

436:. I don't think such biliographies currently exist on WP, although I'm surprised they don't. Do we want to include articles like this? I think it probably would be a good idea, but I'm not certain how they should be named and organized. I think all of Knowledge should be included in such a discussion. Comments? 315: 3688:

I think the contributions list is good. I was surprised to see my name is at the top ;-) However, splitting up "contributions" by say "reviewed", "copied" and "merged", might reveal a truer picture of everyones contributions. (For example, I have confined my efforts mostly to reviewing.) At any rate,

3404:

Hmm. Didn't mean to rekindle the debate of whether proofs are needed or not. Since reviewing is time-consuming, I thought it would be good to put a ticky-mark on an article to indicate its a proof, so it can be found later, if desired. However, I now realize that the majority of not-needed articles

3009:

I had thought that there was some value in having the status fields be self-explanatory. Now I think that just using the abbreviations might be the best thing after all. And while I still think the distinction between merged and copied has value, I no longer think the distinction between adequate and

1257:

templates, so as to identify those articles that use PM material under license or that cite a PM article. I'm not exactly sure on the suitability of such categories (although there are stub categories so why not these?) -- could someone else comment on the suitability of this? On particular concern

1097:

The goal of such articles would be to improve the verifiability of the correctness of the content of articles given in wikipedia. I envision the day, many years from now, when WP is not 'just' an encyclopedia, but is a reference that is comprehensive, as comprehensive as e.g. Abramowitz & Stegun

473:

Last week I mentioned to Aaron that I couldn't view the history of PlanetMath articles. PM was only showing the current article and those versions modified in the past couple of weeks. He said he'd restore them from backups, but I figured I'd mention it here in case you all are looking, and because

4713:

Probably the most likely help you'll find from AsteroidMeta is that that's where we make sure that PlanetMath continues to exist, grow, and thrive. As to how we'll know what these things mean, it depends largely on what the PM user community and other correspondents have to say about it. Looking at

4526:

And on an unrelated topic, I would like to revisit the subject of proofs. The general sentiment, per a section somewhere above, seems to be that we should not disregard proofs by default. However, the truth is also that very few proofs have been copied so far, few proofs will be copied in total, and

4501:

The whole of PlanetMath, including the pictures (as far as I can see), falls under the GFDL, like Knowledge. So I think you can just copy the PNG image to either the English Knowledge or the Commons and tag it as GFDL, including the URL where you got it from. I assume you only have problems with the

4220:

That would be very complicated. We are talking about tens of thousands of redirects and without any background information about the articticles to redirect to, one can also get it wrong. About the "Mathieu groups" though, the Knowledge convention is that in absolute majority of cases one should not

3941:

I have also wondered about the number of updates, and I am very curious who is/are clicking all the time. Perhaps you can just have the bot run with a fixed frequency (once a day should be plenty). Another possibility is to put the stats on a separate page which is transcluded in this page; then the

3534:

Excellent! The refresh button also sounds like a very good idea. My only quibble though is that the totals at the bottom were not changed. This seems like the sort of thing that the mathbot would be very good at. That seems much more important than the signatures issue (though maybe if the bot is

2846:

Now I will start writing some of that Perl noisy syntax which Jitse hates. Rich's script needs to be a bit more robust. For example, if the status has the words "needs" and "copied", then that should be a good indication that the article needs to be copied. Deal with all the other cases simiarly. If

2080:

Hi Paul. I fixed that one now. The reason for the bug was that there are just a lot of ways to display math formulas as images, and I did not treat them all. Now that article looks better, but I don't know what to do about the eqnarray construct, it does not really have a WikiTeX equivalent I think.

1203:

Brilliant, Oleg! I checked 60-XX and 39-XX and they seemed to work fine. The only suggestion I would make is that if _NOTOC_ has been removed from the page, then it would save removing it again if it wasn't added in the update -- of course this is a very minor thing. Overall it seems to work very

662:

I actually had the same idea, so I'd say: go for it (I won't have enough time this month). I was planning to use the database dump instead of crawling the web site. As you probably realize, you should generate the list on a separate page instead of overwriting the list; and I would put all the links

3820:

In my view, none of the articles can be copied (using them as references is of course OK, the same way you would use non-FDL'ed works) until further work has been done by the admins of both sites. When the appropriate steps WRT licensing have been taken, then all of the wikipedia articles should be

3097:

I changed the status line and removed the duplicates. I checked all the diffs (I hope!) and seems there were no problems with my code. Can't say for sure since in some places the diff is a sea of red (removing the duplicates confused the diff). Some edits might have not gotten through as the server

2630:

Nice work on the table Jitse!. I think color coding would be great. I'm one of those silly people who are motivated by things like that. Thats why I think percentages might be nice, besides, I just figured one of you code wizards would simply wave your magic wand and conjure up some bot pixie to do

2588:

Also I'm thinking about some tweaks to the table. Maybe make the columns narrower, using more abbreviated column headings? I wish now that we had chosen shorter status messages (e.g: OK, Better, Not needed, Copied, Merged, Needs copying, Needs merging) These would be easier to type, and less error

1053:

I think proofs certainly should be in the same article as the theorem. However, I would be very careful when to add proofs. This is an encyclopedia after all, not a collection of math papers. Proof should be added when they are not too hard, and when they actually add some value to the article, and

954:

Bah. I should bludgeon myself over the head. OF COURSE there are more articles using the templates than appear to have been processed: the apparently-processed articles are quite a bit fewer than the actually-processed articles! I was fooled by the whole problem of stats on the main project page

820:

into MS Excel (say what you will, it's handy for quick jobs), and edited the HTML into a table. Took about 5 minutes to do that, and another minute to generate totals and percentages. The drawback is that reviewed articles in categories that haven't been completely reviewed will not appear in the

372:

These days I will try to learn how to fetch wiki-markup code from Knowledge, and how to upload it back. I have some hints that this should be possible. If so, it will be very easy to automate completely the process of maintaining the lists. Then, from time to time I would just need to run my script

4026:

which show up on the main page via templates. One question. Both are big tables, and actually I wondered about it before, should they really show up on the main page, or is a link enough? Of course, then we would need one more click to see them, but people who are really interested in those tables

3523:

The second edit actually updated the stats (semiautomatically for now). One side effect here is that the obnoxious mathbot replaced all the other contributors' signatures by its own. I could make the code not replace the signature in rows where no change occured to start with, but for now I am not

3295:

where the formal proof is uninteligible to someone who is or has not taken a complex analysis course, whereas I feel the geometric sketch tells much more about what's happening, even at the cost of leaving some gaps. So I don't think that proofs have no place in wikipedia just for being proofs. --

3119:

Nice work Oleg. I will update the table on the project page to reflect the elimination of the "more complete" status, adding the numbers under "Bt" to "A", and eliminating that column, unless you prefer to perform some perl magic there too? I also think that the order of the status messages should

2678:

OK this does the job but the colour scheme is not great. Feed it the page (cut and paste to a text file) and it will throw out the table entry, colouring it between green and red according to the level of completion. Completeion counts as merged, copied, not needed, more complete or adequate. It

914:

Well... there's always the option of putting 'stats in progress' up for each category that we work on. The question is, do we want to go down this path? I don't think it is such a bad idea, if we also count the unclassified non-duplicates remaining so we can see where the work needs to be done.

598:

Of course, much of PM's content is appropriate for WP also, but I just discovered a set of articles on neutrosophic probability, statistics, sets and logic that appear to be quite unsuitable. It seems that articles on neutrosophic sets, logic and 'neutrosophy' in general have been deleted from WP

378:

And in connection with Ben's comments. If it becomes easier to maintain these pages, it will be possible to suggest more intelligent guesses for corresponding Knowledge articles and then again rerun the script to update the pages (this will not overwrite any comments or anything already in there).

3897:

I guess you are suggesting that mathbot should refuse to update the table if nothing changed. That is doable, but I am not sure it is worth the trouble (I would need to write a function to do a comparision of "before" and "after".) An easier way is to just remove the datestamp of mathbot from the

3636:

signatures, (show up in red?) , we could reinterpret the meaning of the last column to be, by whom and when, the last change was made to that particular category? I also think that JItse's Idea above would be nice if it were relatively easy. Recognizing people's work is always a good thing to do.

3561:

Of course, the bot is just as stupid as its boss. To satisfy the egos of the editors of human flesh, perhaps the bot could count the signatures on all the subpages and summarize the results here, like "Alice reviewed 341 articles, Bob reviewed 20 articles and copied 3, ..." Oh, it's great to tell

2869:

If and when I re-run, I will make the code more forgiving, unless the new status sybols below mean I don't have to. I will also look at the perl module to automayrte, but once I got up to speed I could stat a page in about 25 seconds, so unless it becomes a regular task it may not be worthwhile.

2857:

if (/Status:(*)/) { # after "Status:" and all the way up to a newline (after the newline the comments start) $ status=$ 1; # the string following the words "status" if ($ status =~ /need/i && $ status =~ /copied/i ){ ++$ a;} # needs copying I guess

1179:

Two remarks are in order. First, on PlanetMath they sort the articles alphabetically, with the exception of the names of mathematicians, which are sorted by last name, and with the exception of article titles starting with formulas, which are sorted separately. I was not able to reproduce that, I

1148:

I don't think Linas's vision is encyclopedical (no, I will not suggest again that Linas might be happier at PlanetMath). This is not the right place to discuss this anyway, as it is a very important topic for the whole math community here. I would suggest that Linas give a very careful thought to

495:

I've had a little trouble looking at some PM pages today. Sometimes they come up with something like, "Timed out waiting for render", which I assume means that their server is under significant load and can't always produce the page in time (?). Trying again later usually fixes the problem (and

4159:

This is as amusing as it must be frustrating. When I first checked the logs for my professional web page a few years back, I quickly noticed that the VAST majority of hits were from bots, particularly my own university's search bot! Eventually, I had to add a dummy link, invisible to graphical

3880:

I think the title says it all. Is that actually people hitting the update link, or are they scheduled? If they are scheduled, they happen way more often than they need to. 5 times a day is way excessive and I find it hard to believe that that is people hitting the link. do 5 different people

3546:

The Automatic stats are great! As for Mathbot, he may not be stupid (that remains to be seen) but he is certainly an egotistical, glory-hogging, credit-stealing, upstaging little so-and-so! But I guess if he is going to do all the work, he should get all the credit. I hope he knows how to count!

2318:

Sorry for being away/inactive. I've spent the last few months winding down things and moving. I'll be back on CDVF again and I'm bringing in a few new coders to work on the interface, bug fixes, and minor improvements while I work on a plugin to CDVF that will make it twice as good as before.

737:

This suggests either misuse of the copyright template, or a significant number of misclassifications. I am not a lawyer, but the copyright notice is ONLY required, I think, if copying actually takes place. Expression of an idea from PlanetMath in one's own words only requires a citation, using

678:

These days I am working on copying things from complex analysis. I got tired replacing the dollars with Wiki math tags, and I wrote a very small script to do that for me, along with other minor housekeeping dueties. That might not be of any use of you, but made my life a bit easier, so I post it

830:

To get the counts of pages using the templates, I went to 'What links here' for each template and counted by hand. Those numbers only go up to 500, so I'm sure this will become a rather imprecise method very soon. The total article count may also be rather poor... it should probably be just :

3635:

Great work Oleg! Some nits. Could Mathbot rather than entering a zero in the table leave the cell blank? This makes it easier to "read" the table, and for the NM, and NC columns, see more easily what has to be done. Also I think Mathbot has miscolored "97 Mathematics education". As regards the

3266:

I think we need only three statuses: Not reviewed, reviewed but needs more work (NM and NC), and done. If we decide that we need more information, like we have now, then I'd support splitting NN (not needed) in proofs, dictdefs and nn (non-notable), which is incidentally what I've done in "my"

986: 2233:

By the way, I think you noticed that my program creates wikilinks, which are just existing Planetmath links with the new wiki braket notation. Some of the links are wrong, obviously, as on Knowledge we could have a certain article named differently as on PM. If at some point you fix a certain

1093:

OK. I suggest the creation of a new policy for Knowledge math articles: the creation of secondary/supporting articles, which contain derivations, minor proofs, or detailed bibliographic references. Think something along the lines of "talk" pages, except that they're "proof" pages. They are

769:

Looks good. Regarding usage of templates, I think we all have been doing it correctly, but some people have been using them without consulting the lists. I know that prior to the project starting that someone (I believe Paul August) copied over an article without providing any link back to

3655:

Fixing the zero and the miscoloring was easy enough. The other two things would require parsing signatures and comparing dates. Doable but not immediate. I will do it sometime before the end of the week. Other suggestions are very welcome; anything which can be automated must be automated.

2234:

wikilink as you convert an article, I could make sure that this correction applies throughout any future conversions containing this link. For that one would need to create a conversion table, where one could add a link which one fixed anyway. So, this is just something to be kept in mind.

4802:

You sure its not a programming glitch or corrupted database index? The message I get right after "object not found" is "Please report this to us!" which sounds like they weren't expecting this to happen. Due to my general non-desire to deal with email, I haven't actually reported to them.

1191:

When you get to it, I would like to ask you to check some diffs too, to see if there are any problems. Then, at some point, we will need to stop the work on our project for around 15 minutes to do the updates. This does not have to happen anytime soon, as we do have still plenty of work.

1127:

I still don't see why we should include proofs. It seems to me that the proper answer to the question "whether a given formula is truly correct" is to provide some references. I would place more trust in published, peer-reviewed proofs than on Knowledge proofs. Furthermore, proofs are not

1312:

I wrote a simple web-based script which takes as input the id of an article on PlanetMath and returns back the wiki-code for the article. It is not perfect, but it does save some work when copying stuff. If you try it out, let me know what you think or what can be made better. Here's the

2424:

Oleg: PM articles seem to link "subset" to "inclusion", where we want "subset" (see for example 3692). I've added this to the above list. Does your program access this file dymanically? Or do you have to updated it manually? At any rate your program still produces a link to "inclusion".

1029:

Planetmath does one interesting thing that WP mostly doesn't: provide proofs for theorems. Of course, adding proofs would increase WP's math section ten-fold, but it seems to me that having such would be valuable in the long run (many years/decades from now). Any comments on current WP

3613:

After some delay, the bot finally works, and the link for refreshing the table is in place. It now also computes the totals and the percentages. I would agree with removing the signatures altogether, they just change all the time and show up in red, distracting from the actual changes.

1719: 3966:

While I would be highly curious about the contents of such a log, the problem is not of sufficient importance to justify it, methinks. I do like the suggestion of putting the stats on a separate page. This would make the history more readable, and discourage mischievious clickers.

1176:, and then wrote over it the updates from PlanetMath. So, if you visit that page, go to each individual lists, and do a diff of the current version (with updates from PlanetMath) and the one before it (which is just a copy of what we have here), you will see what the changes are. 1098:

is for special functions. When it gets that big, there is the potential problem of asking whether a given formula is truly correct; the answer to which is invariably a proof. We may as well start talking about this now, and experiment with a few 'house styles' for handling this.

989:, despite there being 46 unreviewed articles (29 have been reviewed). I think that provided it's not overused in small or barely-examined categories, the benefits of this outweigh the disadvantages (such as the added clutter), but wanted to ask the rest of you what you thought. 641:

I might one day write a script to keep that list up to date automatically, by crawling from ] to all math cagories, and from there to the articles. As long as a given article is categorized, and that category is in another category, all the way down to ], I should be able to find

790:

CryptoDerk: thanks for clearing that up. I was getting a little worried, since I think that copyright is something to take seriously and we shouldn't saddle ourselves with superfluous licenses. Or maybe I'm just paranoid! Your explanation seems adequate to account for this.

3989:

that I was "having fun now imagining repeatedly commanding him to count over and over and over again until his little brain melts", I would like to assure everybody that it is not me! I wouldn't want to be reported to The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Bots.

2409:

After the conversion to wikicode, some wikilinks are obviously wrong. For example, on Planetmath the link to "function" is for some reason called "image2.html" which is kind of silly. I am making a table listing PlanetMath links and their corresponding Knowledge equivalents at

2923: 2889: 503:

Further conversations revealed that the background process that renders has been broken for "a while". If it times out, reloading will usually cause it to render, but if you just get a blank page (like I was earlier), it may have to be manually rerendered by PM staff.

1187:

I looked at around 10 diffs and it seems my script does not screw anything up (except it removed some of Paul's comments which were not attached to a specific article, but rather, to certain sections; but that happened only in one section, and is I think, not crucial).

4185:

Well, what could be more elegant than doing nothing? :) I was under the (false) impression that the 'culprits' had done a bad thing. These bots are pretty useful little triggers for things that need occasional updating. I wonder what else they could be used for...

2368:

PS Crypto, we definitely want you first of all catching vandals. :) I think there was more vandalism when you were off. (I feel a lot of peace in heart knowing that there is somebody out there taking care of vandalism. Today I saw somebody deleting a paragraph from

1215:

Ok, great, but how do I use this? I see for example, that 33-XX special functions on PM has changed. Should I copy those changes to here? If so, then how will I detect future changes? Note that I have been hacking 33-XX over here since you last updated over there.

2781:

Rich, I have a challenge to you. If you (1) like Perl programming (2) know how to install Perl modules, then you could write a script to periodically fetch data from our project, compute the statistics above, and spit out the data in the table. What do you think?

2887:

If the answer to this question is yes (and even if it is no, still useful for future reference), another question I want to ask is whether it is worth preserving comments made by us at the beginning of sections, as opposed to comments to individual articles (see

1094:

out-of-line (since they're mostly boring). Thier use would not be encouraged, except in such cases where the validity of a formula may be questionable to some readers (e.g. may have been challenged in a talk page, or may be 'less than obvious' in some way).

4042:

I don't really think that's necessary. It's not as though there's much people need to scroll past the tables to find, and it's kind of nice to have them right there. My vote is for keeping them on the front page. Visible progress keeps people interested.

3809:

Simply put: I don't think Knowledge is conforming to the GFDL's requirements for acknowledging GFDL'ed source materials, and I also think that they have set up their site in such a way that it is infeasible to conform to the GFDL when using their materials.

2295:

for this — and I have none :( By the by the way, while we are on the subject of awards, and since Crypto has crept out of the woodwork so to speak, I should also say that he deserves an award (if he doesn't already have one, or even if he does) for his

3669:

Done. There is still a zero at totals, but I think needs to be there, I mean if the space is empty for the total number of articles it might look strange, no? Also, for now I removed the timestamp from mathbot's signature, it just changes all the time.

2798: 3826:

so, I wanted more eyeballs on the issue to see what can be done from each side if indeed there's an issue (for instance I think WP articles taken from PM do not cite at least (or fewer if less) 5 authors from the original PM entries. Comments, anyone?

4921:

I've put together with PlanetMath contributor Raymond Puzio. Inspired by the PlanetMath Exchange project, our aim with this proposal is to improve the PlanetMath platform and make it easy to produce mathematics textbooks -- for export to places like

778:

had been copied over from PM a long time ago, so he added the template. Since then our article has been expanded a great deal, so when Mikkalai got to it, he flagged it as being more complete. These are just two instances, I'm sure there are more.

2823:

Lol. Yes I have a habit of doing that! That's what I was referring to when I wrote above that I wish we (meaning me) had chosen simpler status messages. I thought about changing those just now, but I decided to see if Rich is up to the challenge ;-)

1168:

I finished and tested the code for automatically updating things from PlanetMath. I must say it took forever for me to finish that, both because of technical issues (like Knowledge changing some of their protocols, etc), and due to my laziness.

2247:

Cool work on that script. Regarding the line, I don't like the look of it. I never have. I also see it put on articles when there is a "This article is about so and so. For the farmer, see so and so" note at the top. Hate hate hate hate.

4483:

which I don't know how to copy, since I don't think it falls under fair use. Since it IS PS of some sort (*.eps) isn't it possible to copy that source, then have the typesetter reconstruct it over here, or am I just going to have to omit it? -

867:

I don't think those values are meaningless, but I see your point. I wasn't too sure when I calculated them, but figured that they could be used to say meaningful things. Remove 'em if you don't like 'em—I don't feel strongly either way.

4085:

is a proof article, but I still decided that the proof should be included in Knowledge because it is a constructive proof, and the construction is actually important in numerical algebra when one wants to compute a Schur decomposition. --

1183:

Second, now all the sections are sorted by section number. Before that, the order was a bit strange, and I suspect I might have inherited that from the PlanetMath structure. So in some (just a few) places, some sections are interchanged.

1231:

I would need to copy over the new stuff from PlanetMath to my computer, then copy our project too, merge them, and upload back here. All of that is automated. One day when we feel we did a lot of work and want new stuff, I will do that.

3524:

sure it is worth bothering. The formatted table now looks a bit worse stylistically (you see some XX in places). I will trim them sometime. And eventually I plan to place a link under the table, which will refresh the stats on demand.

3765:

Actually, it is likely there was a bug in the script. After getting rid of zeros in the stats table (as per Paul) I was having poor mathbot try to add up empty strings with numbers. Surely confused my bot. Now it works well it seems.

3731:

OK Mathbot does not seem to want to obey me. I order him to count, but he just seems to sit there pretending to be asleep (with my browser saying "contacting www.math.ucla.edu"). Do I need to give him a kick in the butt or something?

585:

so beware (I marked them as such in the lists). Despite being true, they are minor statements and are not called "Siegel's axiom" or the "fundamental theorem of transcendence". Hopefully other such jokes will be easily discovered.

56: 1870: 4768: 3785:

There's a thread right now at Planetmath discussing the content exchange between the sites, and it has been raised the point that wikipedia may not be holding GFDL as well as PM does. So I would like some feedback. The thread is at

2272:

Well I think it should be separated from the text in some way. Having it follow the last line of the text is confusing I think, especially if it is the last line of a section, because then it looks like it is part of that section.

4522:

Well, this project is one year old now, and a lot of work has been done. We have 3923 articles listed in here, while on PlanetMath now they have 4797 articles over there. How about copying over the links to the newer entries?

3291:. The combinatorial proof is intuititve and it could be nicely ilustrated with a few pictures (I'm guilty of not having done them yet ;) whereas the calculational approach has little added value. I saw he same situation on 2961:(not having to keep track of things across multile sections will simplify my code a lot). Also, unless Rich gets there before me, I plan to add statistics to each section and periodically update the main statistics table. 348:

Fair enough -- I figured it was a problem specific to probability, but I agree with your comment (now on the archived page). Still looking for an answer to the above, if there is one... PS: thanks for moving this here.

3891:

The mathbot updates as often as one clicks on the link. I can remove the link, but then you will be at the mercy of my whims, I will update the list when I feel like it (and ask for a wikibribe before satisfying any such

4023: 1561: 4697:

In our part of the multiverse, PlanetMath actually means we copy math articles from over there. Superman's services from the above fortress would be much appreciated, if that guy knows some math and how to type TeX.

4019: 2615:

Be bold, especially when hacking my edits to pieces :) Percentages are nice, but somebody has to compute them. I thought about some colour coding to indicate when all articles are reviewed, or all are processed. --

3228:

Any opinons about that? I myself don't like proofs on Knowledge, so I would be tempted to support such a Proof=nocopy status. On the other hand, puttting such a no-exceptions restriction could look a bit too much.

2508:

I think it takes up too much space, so I tried to replace the first few entries by a table. I think the table looks cleaner, but opinions may differ. I removed the signatures since they are not very useful IMO. --

261: 115: 1572: 3242:. But the status line is not meant for such a thing. :) OK, if you want me to write a script to tell how many proofs are there, I am rather lazy to do that for me moment, as I don't see what that would gain. 895:. But it would be of course way too much pain to go count the articles in each category. Your stat is a good thing though, as it gives some measure of progress (even if it shows how much more work we have ): 3384:

I changed the status of all "my" proofs from "Not needed on WP" to "Not needed on WP: Proof". This should not break any script, and we can easily adapt any script to count the proofs separately (or not). --

4531:, and count those "reviewed", rather than "unreviewed", or at least, not counting them at all when doing the totals in the table. I would argue that this will reflect better our progress so far. Comments? 1040:

PlanetMath frequently has an entry on "some theorem" and a separate entry on "proof of some theorem". In Knowledge these articles should generally be combined into one entry under the title "some theorem".

2498:

The neat layout is definitely due to Paul. There will come a day, hopefully in a week or two, when I will set up mathbot to periodically add new info from PlanetMath as well as keep the stats up to date.

720: 691:

instead of $ ..$ s/\\displaystyle//g; # get rid of displaystyle s/\\rvert/\|/g; s/\\lvert/\|/g; # substitute \lvert, \rvert by plain old vertical bars s/\<\/math\: -->

4387:). Our current practice is to include some proofs where appropriate. So the answer really is just try to use your best judgment. By the way you may want to add yourself to these "participants lists": 3519:

I am getting closer to updating automatically the stats for the project. Today I did two edits. The first, introduced a newline between rows and inserted the silly comment

698:

It reads text from standard input in Unix and prints text to standard output. I call it from XEmacs, so it takes whatever text I have in a buffer, processes it, and replaces it with the new text.

3721:

Just a remark. If you start mathbot to update the stats, please check after it. Sometimes it truncates the page when submitting. I truly doubt the issue is with the bot, rather some server thing.

4209:

Redirects? It is pretty silly, for example, that "Mathieu groups" doesn't redirect to "Mathieu group." This is a somewhat delicate process, but it could probably be automated to some degree.

4784:

So I guess that PlanetMath deleted some of their articles or reorganized them. The solution is then I guess as Paul suggests above, to delete our corresponding links to dead PlanetMath pages.

1001:

Eventually all the ugly characters which did not get encoded properly in the autogenerated list will need to be replaced when an automatic update is performed (again, for now wix is broken).

4169:

A more elegant solution ... who cares? :) A bot calculates the statistics, other bots prod it to do work, and all left for humans is do their little part, reviewing PlanetMath articles. :)

533:

Well, it is not unclassified because it cannot be. Hopefully articles stay there only temporary, until somebody puts them where they belong. I will keep on eye there too from time to time.

4584:

I added new articles from PlanetMath. If you go through the lists, the new articles will be marked with . Don't know if that's the best thing, and I can change it if there are other ideas.

3520:. That is necessary, not because my bot is stupid, but rather because otherwise the wiki diffs become a sea of red. The comments above forces the wiki diff to compare things row by row. 1440: 845:

Addendum: I've now incorporated the above into the article, so it should be clear where the numbers came from. This was a bit of an oversight on my part, so thanks for the suggestion!

4718:

For things like "code, finances, lobbying", you'd need to contact the wikimedia foundation, the people who run wikipedia. We here are just powerless peons who read WP and PM articles.

3799:

Copying or copy-and-modifying from Knowledge is NOT fine in my view, since until the site admins (for both sites, actually) take action, such copying is not going to be GFDL compliant.

2895:

Or maybe the right thing to do is to actually have this kind of information at each section, and which would be updated automatically. Would such per section statistics be desirable?

2974:

How about something like: OK, Better, Not needed, Copied, Merged, Needs copying, Needs merging? And perhaps we don't need to make a distinction between OK and Better? Just have OK?

4825: 4392: 3748:

Can you try again? Maybe the UCLA server was down or something. I clicked on the link now (and I did it being outside the the UCLA network), and mathbot is ticking along nicely.

817: 41: 417:

to add: "if the WP field is correct please remove the qualifier "guess". I'm going through the lists and removing "guess" for the entries whose status has already been updated.

4689:

of the PlanetMath multiverse. We would be interested in chatting with you about the relationship of PlanetMath and Knowledge. If you wish, that conversation might unfold from

4424:

I am weary of proofs. If you include them, it is good if they are short, or elementary, or truly relevant, or go to the bottom, or just not adding the proof to start with. :)

488:

Update: Aaron says "some of those entries just need to be rerendered, from the rather turbulent period we just went through" and he is "still working on the version history".

3916:

I can implement a log which will post what IP address and web domain is responsible for each click, and make that log public. Is that going to make you feel a bit better? :)

3287:

proofs are a valuable addition to wikipedia, specially those that shed light onto concepts instead of being a chain of calculations and logic deductions. For instance, take

612: 4668:

Seems that PM is alive and healthy, content-wise. They currently have 5664 articles, which is (5664-4810)/4810=18% growth in 9 months or 24% annual growth. Not too shabby.

3423:: My browser (Safari) reports errors of "can't connect to host", for each png on the page. I had to resort to using Oleg's Pmform tool just to be able to "see" the images. 4249:

Some of the categories (those between 31 and 45, in particular) seem to have dissappeared from the table of topics, and have been absent over several edits. What gives?

1902: 4733:

I've been running across several PM entries for which clicking on the link gives the message "Object not found!" e.g. the following entry from the general topology list:

1951: 1258:

is that it might clog up the category listing at the bottom of a page if it licenses PM text and cites an article. Perhaps there is a way to get around this? Cheers,

4555:

On bringing links to new articles, this would obviously be a good idea. I don't know how you guys did it before, but if you did it manually let me know how I can help

2847:

the status does not match any of the options and is not empty either, record that as a problem to be looked into (most likely a misspelling somewhere). How about that:

1931: 1757: 2414:. If there is any link which you encounter and need to fix again and again, you could just write it there, and my script will take care of them in future occurences. 2389:

for discussion about missing categories needed to make the correpondence between AMS subject classificaiton numbers and Knowledge categories a well-defined function.

832:

4000 since duplicates may mess things up. Probably it is the unique article count that is closer to the 4000 value. I'll make a couple of edits to reflect this.

2359:

About "\prec", it can be easily changed to \le, however I will think more tomorrow if some workaround is available. (Also tomorrow hope to get to the cats thing).

1981: 1780: 4388: 1460: 1369: 955:

vs. articles that have been processed but are not noted on the main page. Reasons like CryptoDerk offered (above) should account for any remaining discrepancy.

2884:

Question one. Is it a good time to start adding new articles information from PlanetMath, or is it premature since there is still a lot of work? Just wondering.

706:

Just a note, some articles use `` and '' for quotes instead of ", which are standard here. Also, some articles there use \mbox, which needs to be taken out.

599:(they are still in Google's index, however). My guess is that on WP it was deemed a neologism, original research or somesuch. I think I've noted them all as 4918: 4775:. If you compare the two, you will see of course mostly the same articles, but some articles we have like the above "every zero dimensional space is T_3" is 3357:

been a consensus for not having very many proofs, since they will often get in the way of exposition. However I think Linus makes an important point (above:

1790: 4968: 2589:

prone, and typos make automated counting harder. Is it worth changing now? Also it might be nice to display percentage reviewed, and percentage processed?

1005: 4769:

Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics/PlanetMath Exchange/54-XX General topology#54-00 General reference works (handbooks, dictionaries, bibliographies, etc.)

4926:. Your endorsement of the grant proposal would mean a lot! And any comments prior to the Sept. 30, 2013 deadline will help us improve the proposal. -- 91: 2436:

Well, first of all my program does not access that file dynamically, only when I chose to download it (I can easily make it dynamic, see what I did at

802:

Interesting, how are you getting these stats? Are you doing it by hand? Are you using the stats from the project page, or are you recounting yourself?

4973: 1109:

since frankly the need is not so great, at least, not now; these can be defered. There's more important stuff now. But I do not want to mark them as

4384: 3362: 938:

Never mind, I was too tired to think of what I was writing. But your idea with a stat in progress is nice, if one willing is put the extra effort.

4400: 3367:

verifiability will be the single most important determinant of whether or not Knowledge is ever considered to be an authoritative reference work

4649: 4141: 3832: 3102: 2386: 1150: 226: 17: 4144:. Except for a couple of clicks from Berkely last night, most are clicks from the google page crawler and an Inktomi search bot. Interesting. 460:

There are actually several subheadings for topology there. That page needs some major work and reformatting to keep everything consistent :(

3679:

I added a list of people who contributed. Feeback on formatting this needed. Mathbot does not yet add this automatically -- to be worked on.

2203:

Also maybe it would be a good idea to separate the "planetmath" template with a line by adding "----" on the line before it? See for example

1714:{\displaystyle {\begin{matrix}f(a_{1})&=&a_{2}\\f(a_{2})&=&a_{3}\\&\vdots &\\f(a_{k})&=&a_{1}\\\end{matrix}}} 1468: 1275: 97: 723:? It occurred to me that it might be nice to see a breakdown of how things are progressing, so I put together a few very basic statistics. 963:

As far as the number of articles we have, it is exactly 3921 (based on counting each id once). I updated this now in the statistics page.

448: 4638:

Might be worth another crawl; I noticed several articles at PM that weren't listed here. (unless I got confused by double listings??)

4259:

Fixed. Recently I also modified the way my bot fetches and updates the table of topics, so I think it will get likely to be corrupted.

3898:"last updated" lines. Then even if it attempts to update the tables, nothing will show up in the history if no actual changes happen. 3863: 2443:

I figured out why that "inclusion" link did not work. On PlanetMath the original link is "inclusion2" (you can check that by visiting

4446:

My opinion is that you should at least put an external link to PM proofs in the WP articles if you choose not to include them in WP

4413: 217: 181: 4140:

We were wondering who is clicking so often on the mathbot link having it update the statistics. Well, I started keeping a log, at

647:

I don't know if I will do this, need to talk to other people to see what they think. In the meantime, you of course have a point!

401:

I imaging since we're signing our comments in the list after processing each article, it will be possible to compare timestamps.

4160:

browsers, so that I could establish a rough baseline. No doubt you are able to put in place a more elegant solution than mine!

3496:

I guess some asteroid hit this planet. Or maybe it is one of those bodies beyond Pluto which this week got too far from the sun.

2437: 414: 3419:

Is any one else experiencing problems viewing the images in PlanetMath articles? For example when I try to download this page:

1250: 1173: 732: 554:. I'll update the relevant instructions to tell people to watch out for this, but I wanted to let everyone know here as well. 4383:

Welcome to the project Jeeck, and thanks for contributing. Opinion is somewhat divided on whether or when to have proofs (see

4264:

However, if that happens in the future, you can just revert to an old working version and click on the link to rerun the bot.

3487:

For me, the whole site is non-responsive at certain times. I get no reply at all. It has been like that on and off all week.

2892:

for an example). It looks to me that this kind of information would become partially obsolete when more articles are added.

297:

since I've thought about such things, but can anyone tell me if there is a good reason where there are so few redirects from

37: 4575:

I'm pretty sure it will work out fine. And if human judgement fails, I'm sure that democracy will do the job for proofs :-)

4954: 4935: 4904: 4886: 4864: 4851: 4832: 4807: 4793: 4756: 4722: 4707: 4672: 4659: 4642: 4624: 4596: 4579: 4570: 4559: 4540: 4511: 4495: 4462: 4450: 4433: 4377: 4273: 4253: 4230: 4213: 4204: 4190: 4178: 4164: 4153: 4127: 4109: 4095: 4075: 4047: 4036: 4012: 3997: 3971: 3951: 3925: 3907: 3885: 3870: 3844: 3770: 3752: 3739: 3725: 3716: 3700: 3683: 3674: 3660: 3643: 3618: 3587: 3571: 3554: 3539: 3528: 3500: 3491: 3470: 3453: 3440: 3430: 3409: 3394: 3339: 3305: 3276: 3246: 3233: 3222: 3198: 3169: 3149: 3140: 3113: 3027: 3004: 2968: 2949: 2916: 2874: 2864: 2810: 2786: 2773: 2752: 2743: 2683: 2657: 2625: 2535: 2518: 2503: 2492: 2459: 2418: 2403: 2393: 2377: 2363: 2259: 2238: 2197: 2168: 2125: 2094: 2085: 1321: 618: 4821: 3859: 1254: 969: 739: 86: 4742: 3436:

I did some PlanetMath articles reviewing for our project these days and noticed the same thing. Wonder what is going on.

2909:

which we have are useful or not. For me personally they looked more useful at the beginning, but don't look so anymore.

2488:

This follows Paul August's/Oleg's neat layout. Someone clever could build this into an automatic updater, if they like.

1063:

And proofs must certainly be in their own section or subsection, to make it easy for people who want to skip over them.

156: 1137:, so I won't oppose the creation of such an article. Similarly, I wouldn't mind adding the "Proof" status category. -- 4370:

The number indicates that more than one article are present for that formula, and * means somebody has included them.

4362: 2578:

better way of presenting the information (especially now that it has sigs, and there mostly mine, thanks Jitse ;-) —

2012: 630: 77: 4824:

and most other "categories by source". If people want to defend this category (and I imagine they will), comment at

4617:

Great work Oleg. I like the tag. And I agree with AdamSmithee, that we should continue to handle proofs as we have.

2189:

I will do that tonight. Actually, I can even add as categories what they list as AMS classification (see for example

1030:

status/phiolosphy for proofs? WP:PMEX doesn't nmention this, I haven't seen this discussed elsewhere. (Unsigned from

2385:

I finished implementing the automatic categorization of articles, based on the AMS subject classification. See also

1134: 4027:

would put them on the watchlist anyway to see when the bot updates them. Just a thought, wonder what people think.

110: 2964:

Paul, you mentioned about possibly shorter names for the status line. Do you have in mind anything in particular?

4900: 4882: 4847: 4789: 4703: 4592: 4536: 4429: 4350: 4347: 4269: 4226: 4200: 4174: 4149: 4123: 4071: 4032: 4008: 3921: 3903: 2448: 2411: 652: 567: 538: 384: 339: 128: 4565: 2922:

Here are my thoughts. Yes it is a bit too soon to update. As far as the section stats, I started using them in

2255:

I don't linke the line much either. Let us see if more opinions come in about this. I will leave it in for now.

968:

At PlanetMath they have 4088 (which reminds me that I need to finish that update script, but I will do it after

124: 4842:

It's been more than a year since the last update. How about running my bot to add new entries from PlanetMath?

4480: 4118:

on a proof could be a good initial guess, and may give us a better idea of how many articles are left to copy.

3353:

proofs should be be incorporated into Knowledge, since they can have explanatory value. And I think there has

682:#!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use diagnostics; undef $ /; # allow it to read whole file in one line $ _=<: --> 294: 4502:

legal issues; if your problems concern the technical process, please let me know and I'll copy it for you. --

4066:. This would overwrite the status field when the status field is empty, and leave it the way it is otherwise. 1386: 583: 4950: 4546:

Well, IMHO to mark all proofs and count them as reviewed would practically be equivalent to marking them as

4490: 3815:

and a further analysis of most itens on the GFDL and his comments on each. At the botom he also states that

316:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Mathematics/PlanetMath Exchange/60-XX Probability theory and stochastic processes

4308: 2319:

Maybe I'll get to a point where I don't feel guilty working on PMEX thinking I should be working on CDVF.

821:

stats. The benefit is that any biases in article selection for review within categories will be mitigated.

550:

The alt text for images won't always work. Specifically in cases of long LaTeX lines. As an example, see

4507: 4301: 4291: 4091: 3947: 3840: 3567: 3390: 3335: 3272: 2945: 2806: 2621: 2514: 1283: 1128:

encyclopaedic. I think that most wikipedians agree that generally, there shouldn't be proofs in Knowledge.

1004:

In spite of looking very carefully through several pages I did not find any more than the two I listed at

290: 4762:

Sorry for the late reply. I was away during the first half of september and could not check my watchlist.

4861: 4753: 4656: 4621: 4459: 4409: 4314: 4298: 4106: 3994: 3736: 3697: 3640: 3584: 3551: 3427: 3373: 3159: 3124: 3014: 2978: 2930: 2828: 2732: 2635: 2593: 2582: 2566: 2469: 2429: 2343: 2304: 2277: 2211: 2182: 2146: 2107: 2073: 2059: 1953: 1338: 1082: 806: 440: 421: 395: 365: 162: 4946: 4336: 4333: 203: 3023:

Sounds good. Sometimes this week (or weekend) I will replace the old status lines with the new ones.

695:/g; # same for comma print "$ _"; # spit out the output 23: 4896: 4878: 4843: 4785: 4699: 4686: 4588: 4532: 4425: 4265: 4222: 4196: 4170: 4145: 4119: 4067: 4028: 4004: 3917: 3899: 3767: 3749: 3722: 3713: 3680: 3671: 3657: 3615: 3525: 3497: 3437: 3323: 3243: 3230: 3194: 3166: 3146: 3137: 3110: 3024: 3001: 2965: 2913: 2871: 2861: 2783: 2770: 2749: 2740: 2680: 2654: 2532: 2500: 2489: 2456: 2415: 2400: 2399:

I replaced for now \prec with \triangleleft. This is a dirty hack, but can't think of anything else.

2390: 2374: 2360: 2297: 2256: 2235: 2221: 2194: 2165: 2122: 2091: 2082: 1318: 1291: 1270:

I was very pleasantly surprised to learn that our project will be covered in the next edition of the

1233: 1196: 1154: 1064: 1017: 1009: 973: 939: 896: 699: 648: 615: 563: 534: 380: 335: 2481:

Anyone who wants to update or add statistics to a section, here's a short perl snippet I just used:

4353: 4320: 2100: 2066: 2017: 286: 67: 4587:

So, we have now 4810 articles, up from 3923, and we are 35% done, down from 42%. Not too bad. :)

4330: 726:

I'd appreciate any feedback, or contributions (particularly counts of total and unique articles).

525:

that might need to be processed as well. Fortunately there is only one article there right now.

225:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

4874: 4738: 4485: 4344: 4327: 4317: 4287: 4082: 3787: 3420: 3327: 2444: 2351: 2336: 2332: 2044: 1331: 1117: 1114: 580: 551: 478: 475: 433: 209: 129: 82: 4374: 3405:

on WP:PMEX are probably going to be proofs, so its not really going to be hard to locate these.

3000:, and same for others, to get the same abbreviations as in the main page stats table. Opinions? 2335:

uses "\prec" function which doesn't parse, perhaps it could be converted into "\le"? Converting

2190: 1274:(the official newsletter of the Wikimedia Foundatoin), which is currently being translated: see 193: 175: 4356: 3292: 1881: 4527:

proofs, in general, are a lower priority. I would suggest marking proofs with a new flag, say

4503: 4311: 4295: 4087: 3943: 3867: 3836: 3563: 3386: 3331: 3268: 2941: 2802: 2617: 2510: 1279: 1138: 770:

Planetmath. Perhaps he has since added the template, but hasn't updated the list yet. Also,

664: 603:. Again its something to keep an eye out for, but I'm sure we'll catch most of these cases. 361:

Will we try to update our PlanetMath article lists as new articles are created on PlanetMath?

63: 2099:

I converted the the "eqnarray"s to "matrix"s and the element separating "\"s to "\\"s, see

1936: 1271: 474:

I've run into a new problem. Some articles I try to view on PM are just blank, for instance

293:? Surely the latter is a legitimate page title and thus a candidate for a redirect. It's a 4931: 4858: 4750: 4653: 4618: 4576: 4556: 4456: 4447: 4405: 4304: 4103: 3991: 3733: 3694: 3637: 3581: 3548: 3424: 3370: 3156: 3121: 3011: 2975: 2927: 2825: 2729: 2632: 2590: 2579: 2563: 2466: 2426: 2340: 2301: 2274: 2208: 2179: 2143: 2104: 2070: 2056: 1335: 1079: 803: 437: 418: 392: 362: 126: 1910: 1727: 693:/g; # put the period inside the formula instead of outside s/\<\/math\: --> 4340: 3467: 3450: 3301: 3136:

Here I think one could use a spreadsheet rather than Perl magic. :) I will do it tonight.

2320: 2249: 2090:

Actually, eqnarray can be split into several equations. I hope to look into that tonight.

2007: 1986: 1298: 1043: 857: 780: 707: 587: 555: 526: 505: 489: 481: 461: 452: 402: 324: 4324: 3319: 3288: 1865:{\displaystyle a_{1}\mapsto a_{2}\mapsto a_{3}\mapsto \cdots \mapsto a_{k}\mapsto a_{1}} 3689:

it is also quite gratifying to see my suspicions confirmed — "Alice" and "Bob" show up

3365:), that proofs (along with citations and references) can help with verifiability — and 3207: 2204: 2032: 2027: 1963: 1762: 775: 305:? This topic must have come up at some point, but I can't find any discussion of it. 3831:

Well, it seems that nobody here knows (or cares about it), so I asked for guidance at

1445: 1354: 4962: 4359: 4187: 4161: 3322:, since I did not know about this article, and there were no links to it from either 2799:

Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics/PlanetMath Exchange/08-XX General algebraic systems

1346:

Start of output text: I modified the section heading level for the "See also" section

1334:(this is the third version of the ouput after Oleg did his two fixes mentioned below 1259: 1205: 990: 956: 916: 883:

Not counting the articles in the categories that haven't been completely reviewed is

869: 846: 833: 792: 771: 762: 634: 604: 497: 350: 306: 2339:

generates a bunch of cruft at the end of the article. I was able to just delete it.

2300:. I've become addicted to it. It is my new favorite thing to do while watching TV. 2291:

By the way Oleg's script is way cool. I'm afraid he is gonna be in line for another

2121:

Thanks, I now implemented what you suggested in the code. More bug reports welcome.

562:

I guess there is a limit to how long the alt could be. It is good you noticed that.

4567: 4373:

Should I just mark all of them as N, or link the proofs to their respective pages?

1957: 4690: 3238:

Or maybe I misunderstood what you want. You want the status line to have the word

3120:

follow the order in the "status table" just above here, i.e. N, A, C, M, NC, NM.

2797:

For further joy, you could try to make your script understand Paul. For instance,

2164:

I will now work on fixing other bugs. As soon as you find any, just list it here.

3165:

Thanks. I should have done it yesterday, but it was getting rather late in here.

1078:

I agree with Oleg that we want tnly beo be judicious in our inclusion of proofs.

4927: 4829: 4250: 4210: 4044: 3968: 3938:

Just charge everybody who clicks $ 1, to be paid to the Wikimedia Foundation. :)

3882: 3862:

contains a trailing period that I would like to remove. Please add your opinion

3536: 2370: 2002: 1372: 1180:

sort everything alphabetically, so in a few places things are a bit displaced.

742:. Conversely, if any text is actually copied, the article should be flagged as 222: 4772: 4648:

Not just yet — let's enjoy having reached 40% reviewed a little while ;-) (see

4003:

OK, I will put the stats on a separate page which is transcluded on this page.

3033:

Ok then if we are going to go with abbreviations I would propose the following:

856:

Adjusted % not needed should be blank, and should not be added into the total.

480:. So, if an article is blank, don't change the status, just check back later. 4804: 4719: 4669: 4639: 4365: 3488: 3406: 3297: 3219: 2040: 1380: 1217: 1120: 1031: 199: 4873:). Those PM people are not wasting time. :) I'll make an announcement at the 4771:

of the bot-generated lists. The original planetmath it was generated from is

1314: 1042:

So, you should copy over the proof, but don't put it in a separate article.

629:

Just a note to say that I've added a recommendation to enter articles in the

4826:

Knowledge:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_March_24#"By-source_categories"

1376: 4481:

http://planetmath.org/?method=l2h&from=objects&id=968&op=getobj

1249:

I was wondering if it might be appropriate to add category listings to the

4923: 522: 3535:

replacing them all the time, we just shouldn't have a signature column).

3098:

was behaving badly tonight, so I will do another pass tomorrow evening.

2801:

has 3 articles marked as more complete, but the table lists only one. --

2354:. That article, unlike others, is abandoned. :( That confused the script. 2292: 2022: 1990: 1556:{\displaystyle f(a_{i})=a_{i+1}\qquad {\mbox{and}}\qquad f(a_{k})=a_{1}} 1195:

Our exchange project is going well, and I (and hope you too) am happy.

1105:? The PM proof articles ... well, I don't really want to mark them as 4081:

I don't like that; I wish to keep a human element here. For instance,

4024:

Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics/PlanetMath Exchange/Table of credits

4284:

I wonder if they are necessary or not. The current list of them are

4058:

If not, I could have the bot put the status of all proof articles as

4020:

Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics/PlanetMath Exchange/Table of topics

2452: 1006:

Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics/PlanetMath Exchange/encoding issues

334:

Crypto, man you have a lot of patience to move all those talk pages!

3449:

If you get on IRC, you can bug Aaron. He's "akrowne" on freenode.

2558:

useful, it tells you who last updated the data and more importantly

1101:

In the interim, how about adding a status category for PM articles:

4550:

and forget about them. I would keep human judgement in the process.

2193:). Some of those will not generate real categories, but some will. 1149:

what he would actually like to do, and post it at the usual place,

731:

More Knowledge articles now sport the PlanetMath copyright notice (

4393:

Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics/PlanetMath Exchange#Participants

3666:

Thanks Oleg. There are still some pesky zeros in the "Rv" column.

3259:

I'm pretty sure that Linas wants the status line to have the word

3218:

on WP? I would be curious to know what fraction of NN are proofs.

1133:

That being said, I don't see any big problem with an article like

972:

gets fixed so that uploads/downloads to Knowledge are automatic).

2440:, but then vandalism of that map of links could be of concern). 1016:

Crypto, thanks and sorry. I got the wrong page for posting that.

4685:

Dear Human Entities, I am jcorneli, lately of AsteroidMeta, the

2065:

I've taken the above source and modified it slightly to create:

721:

Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics/PlanetMath Exchange/Statistics

683:; # read all in $ _ s/\$ \$ \s*(.*?)\s*\$ \$ /\<math\: --> 273:

One of the major things I can see from this list is that on PM,

2178:

Would it be good to add the category mathematics as a default?

1328:

but I don't understand what is going on with the non-inline TeX

729:

Also: if you read that page, you may notice a peculiar thing.

2653:

Table is definitely better! (need to rerite the perl now....)

409:

If the WP field is correct please remove the qualifier "guess"

138: 130: 32: 4917:

Please lend your support to this Individual Engagement Grant

4816:"Category:PlanetMath sourced articles" proposed for deletion 3466:

Nevermind. He's in Italy (even though he's still on IRC).

451:. Subheading for Topology is empty right now. Have fun :) 3981:

Concerning the potential abuse of poor Mathbot, although I

1297:

I'm the one who wrote it up, but that seems like ages ago.

1113:, since, frankly, they are needed. Here are two examples: 3107:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Mathematics/PlanetMath Exchange

2387:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mathematics#New_math_categories

4195:

Yes, I would also like to know what else to automate. :)

4142:

Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics/PlanetMath Exchange/Log

2224:

for now, which will change to something more fancy later.

1989:

says that any permutation can be expressed as product of

687:

instead of $ $ ..$ $ s/\$ \s*(.*?)\s*\$ /\<math\: -->

4913:

new grant proposal: towards a PlanetMath Books exchange!

2940:

1) Don't care; 2) Leave the comments; 3) Not useful. --

2455:. I did it now, and after downloading the map it works. 2081:

Let me know if you see more bugs, there should be many.

889:

and besides me being lazy and having other things to do,

4870: 4749:

Should we just delete these entries when we find them?

521:

There is a list of unclassified PlanetMath articles at

281:. I like the latter, but I'm surprised to see that no 3576:

Who the hell are Alice and Bob? I sure don't remember

2531:

The table is cool. Packs the same info in less space.

2142:

Looks great now! I will proceed to give it a workout.

1577: 1513: 4919:

meta:Grants:IdeaLab/PlanetMath_Books_Project proposal

3267:

section (15-XX Linear algebra; too lazy to link). --

2679:

may crsh on Education which has no articles (div 0)!

1966: 1939: 1913: 1884: 1793: 1765: 1730: 1575: 1471: 1448: 1389: 1357: 1326:

OK I tried it out. I think this will be very useful,

887:

somewhat a drawback. I now work on Complex analysis,

818:

Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics/PlanetMath Exchange

432:

The "General Topology" list has the following entry:

221:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 3101:Oh, and I screed up the edit summary, it refers to 735:) than have apparently required merging or copying! 613:

Knowledge:Votes_for_deletion/Paradoxism-Neutrosophy

373:

to update these pages with new PlanetMath articles.

2331:Ok I've run into a coulple of more problems. PM's 1975: 1945: 1925: 1896: 1864: 1774: 1751: 1713: 1555: 1454: 1434: 1363: 1038:Actually, the main page lists as the first bullet 2039:This article incorporates material from cycle on 1383:itself) such that there exist distinct elements 987:60-XX Probability theory and stochastic processes 4869:Done. The article count went from 4802 to 6940 ( 4693:. Otherwise I'll watch this page. --Joe Corneli 2045:Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License 4895:tag, that is easy to search for and/or notice. 4691:http://planetx.cc.vt.edu/AsteroidMeta/Wikipedia 3866:. I am aware that this affects many pages. -- 2880:Questions about adding new info from PlanetMath 2769:This seems to work.... Couple of bugs removed. 1164:Status of automated updates (it seems it works) 496:both the cited examples above worked for me). 469:Errors with PlanetMath's database & history 4389:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics/Participants 3155:Ok I did it the old fashioned way by hand ;-) 674:Making it easier to convert TeX to Wiki markup 277:seems to be the convention, while on WP it is 1008:. If you run into more, just put them there. 8: 4767:Now, the above line is found in the section 3600:I had several good laughs over the above. :) 1245:PlanetMath license and reference categories? 4773:http://planetmath.org/browse/objects/54-00/ 4518:Fetching new articles and proofs, revisited 2574:Oh any I forgot to say that the table is a 1172:But either way, I mirrored this project at 579:I've found two joke articles on PM so far, 42:WikiProject Mathematics/PlanetMath Exchange 3712:I will refine my script then, sometime :) 3145:(That is, unless you get there before me. 633:to the instructions on the project page. 170: 1965: 1938: 1912: 1883: 1856: 1843: 1824: 1811: 1798: 1792: 1764: 1729: 1701: 1681: 1650: 1630: 1610: 1590: 1576: 1574: 1547: 1531: 1512: 1498: 1482: 1470: 1447: 1435:{\displaystyle a_{1},a_{2},\ldots ,a_{k}} 1426: 1407: 1394: 1388: 1356: 1174:User:Oleg Alexandrov/PlanetMath Exchange/ 758:(even if one of the latter is now true). 155:does not require a rating on Knowledge's 4385:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics/Proofs 3942:update wouldn't pollute the history. -- 3363:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics/Proofs 3036: 2924:03-XX Mathematical logic and foundations 2890:03-XX Mathematical logic and foundations 2692: 2748:Pretty, I'll look at the code tonight. 172: 4114:Yes, good points. But putting the tag 3833:Knowledge:Village pump (miscellaneous) 3103:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Mathematics 1151:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Mathematics 523:http://planetmath.org/?op=unclassified 468: 24:User talk:CryptoDerk/planetmathproject 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Mathematics 3358: 2898:A third question is if links saying 2447:. So, that one had to be mapped (via 2220:That was easy enough. I also put the 985:I've just added a 'status update' to 546:Copying the page doesn't always work! 447:Such articles do exist on Knowledge, 7: 4822:Category:PlanetMath sourced articles 4564:Heh, the human judgement on proofs. 3986: 144: 142: 4743:every zero dimensional space is T_3 4739:every zero dimensional space is T_3 4729:Delete "Object not found!" entries? 3804:I asked for comments got the reply 449:List of publications in mathematics 161:It is of interest to the following 40:for discussing improvements to the 4969:Project-Class mathematics articles 3214:, with the understanding that its 3010:more complete is all that useful. 31: 4455:Yes this seems like a good idea. 3876:Why does Mathbot update so often? 1308:Converting from PlanetMath format 594:Unsuitable articles on PlanetMath 235:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 215:This page is within the scope of 4974:NA-priority mathematics articles 4891:The newly added articles have a 2438:Knowledge:Votes for deletion/Old 893:and merging is often not trivial 517:Unclassified PlanetMath articles 415:template:Planetmath instructions 238:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 202: 192: 174: 143: 57:Click here to start a new topic. 3376:22:23, September 6, 2005 (UTC) 3206:Could I talk you into adding a 3162:16:21, September 8, 2005 (UTC) 2735:03:26, September 2, 2005 (UTC) 2718: 2710: 2702: 1784:This can also be pictured as 1341:00:10, August 26, 2005 (UTC)): 1251:Template:PlanetMath attribution 733:Template:PlanetMath attribution 611:The vfd for this article is at 552:Conway's chained arrow notation 285:redirects exist. For example, 4936:22:27, 27 September 2013 (UTC) 4820:A CfD has been called against 3860:planet math reference template 3588:17:42, 29 September 2005 (UTC) 3572:17:11, 29 September 2005 (UTC) 3555:16:51, 29 September 2005 (UTC) 3540:16:45, 29 September 2005 (UTC) 3529:07:56, 29 September 2005 (UTC) 3501:01:25, 15 September 2005 (UTC) 3492:00:55, 15 September 2005 (UTC) 3471:19:39, 14 September 2005 (UTC) 3454:19:30, 14 September 2005 (UTC) 3441:18:04, 14 September 2005 (UTC) 3431:16:55, 14 September 2005 (UTC) 3127:13:54, September 8, 2005 (UTC) 3017:00:24, September 7, 2005 (UTC) 2981:04:25, September 5, 2005 (UTC) 2957:OK. One day I will remove the 2933:03:52, September 4, 2005 (UTC) 2875:14:47, 10 September 2005 (UTC) 2831:16:50, September 2, 2005 (UTC) 2638:13:30, September 1, 2005 (UTC) 2472:05:23, September 1, 2005 (UTC) 2432:04:30, September 1, 2005 (UTC) 2373:, made me depressed, really). 2043:, which is licensed under the 1940: 1888: 1849: 1836: 1830: 1817: 1804: 1740: 1734: 1687: 1674: 1636: 1623: 1596: 1583: 1537: 1524: 1488: 1475: 1135:Proof of Bohr-Mollerup theorem 1: 4808:04:19, 27 November 2006 (UTC) 4757:20:58, 3 September 2006 (UTC) 4673:04:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC) 4580:20:54, 20 February 2006 (UTC) 4571:19:35, 20 February 2006 (UTC) 4560:20:47, 18 February 2006 (UTC) 4541:04:44, 15 February 2006 (UTC) 4274:02:37, 27 November 2005 (UTC) 4128:19:08, 20 November 2005 (UTC) 4054:So, are proofs needed or not? 3415:Problem with PlanetMath site? 3410:23:48, 6 September 2005 (UTC) 3395:23:17, 6 September 2005 (UTC) 3340:23:17, 6 September 2005 (UTC) 3306:18:51, 5 September 2005 (UTC) 3277:18:39, 5 September 2005 (UTC) 3247:18:13, 5 September 2005 (UTC) 3234:18:10, 5 September 2005 (UTC) 3223:17:45, 5 September 2005 (UTC) 3199:18:10, 5 September 2005 (UTC) 3170:17:04, 8 September 2005 (UTC) 3150:15:24, 8 September 2005 (UTC) 3141:15:21, 8 September 2005 (UTC) 3114:03:49, 8 September 2005 (UTC) 3028:03:19, 7 September 2005 (UTC) 3005:19:40, 5 September 2005 (UTC) 2969:03:42, 5 September 2005 (UTC) 2950:11:18, 4 September 2005 (UTC) 2917:01:24, 4 September 2005 (UTC) 2865:18:24, 2 September 2005 (UTC) 2811:16:02, 2 September 2005 (UTC) 2787:15:46, 2 September 2005 (UTC) 2774:11:55, 2 September 2005 (UTC) 2753:09:48, 2 September 2005 (UTC) 2744:03:35, 2 September 2005 (UTC) 2684:00:36, 2 September 2005 (UTC) 2658:20:28, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 2626:11:46, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 2569:00:11, August 31, 2005 (UTC) 2460:05:03, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 2346:02:22, August 27, 2005 (UTC) 2252:20:23, August 26, 2005 (UTC) 2214:20:13, August 26, 2005 (UTC) 2185:17:19, August 26, 2005 (UTC) 2076:21:30, August 25, 2005 (UTC) 2062:20:40, August 25, 2005 (UTC) 1519: 1510: 1255:Template:PlanetMath reference 740:Template:PlanetMath reference 314:Note: I moved this here from 229:and see a list of open tasks. 54:Put new text under old text. 4794:15:32, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 4512:13:20, 21 January 2006 (UTC) 4496:06:32, 21 January 2006 (UTC) 4254:03:26, 8 November 2005 (UTC) 4231:02:23, 28 October 2005 (UTC) 4214:18:56, 27 October 2005 (UTC) 4205:14:54, 27 October 2005 (UTC) 4191:14:35, 27 October 2005 (UTC) 4179:12:39, 27 October 2005 (UTC) 4165:10:55, 27 October 2005 (UTC) 4154:23:02, 26 October 2005 (UTC) 4110:17:56, 22 October 2005 (UTC) 4096:13:25, 22 October 2005 (UTC) 4083:proof of Schur decomposition 4076:08:40, 22 October 2005 (UTC) 4048:17:39, 24 October 2005 (UTC) 4037:12:14, 23 October 2005 (UTC) 4013:04:41, 23 October 2005 (UTC) 3998:18:18, 22 October 2005 (UTC) 3972:18:42, 22 October 2005 (UTC) 3952:13:25, 22 October 2005 (UTC) 3926:03:28, 22 October 2005 (UTC) 3908:03:26, 22 October 2005 (UTC) 3886:23:52, 21 October 2005 (UTC) 3871:09:30, 12 October 2005 (UTC) 3193:Copied from my talk page by 2689:How about this color scheme? 2596:18:17, August 31, 2005 (UTC) 2585:17:53, August 31, 2005 (UTC) 2323:20:49, August 26, 2005 (UTC) 2307:20:46, August 26, 2005 (UTC) 2280:20:29, August 26, 2005 (UTC) 2149:00:10, August 26, 2005 (UTC) 2110:22:08, August 25, 2005 (UTC) 1985:One of the basic results on 545: 269:Random variable/distribution 4905:02:46, 20 August 2007 (UTC) 4887:02:28, 20 August 2007 (UTC) 4865:03:05, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 4852:02:49, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 4463:15:47, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 4451:08:12, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 4434:21:33, 4 January 2006 (UTC) 4378:10:41, 4 January 2006 (UTC) 4363:Hadwiger-Finsler inequality 3845:21:29, 6 October 2005 (UTC) 3794:. Basically, jac comments: 3771:17:53, 5 October 2005 (UTC) 3753:15:17, 5 October 2005 (UTC) 3740:03:40, 5 October 2005 (UTC) 3726:22:19, 4 October 2005 (UTC) 3717:18:39, 4 October 2005 (UTC) 3701:17:31, 4 October 2005 (UTC) 3684:03:02, 4 October 2005 (UTC) 3675:19:29, 3 October 2005 (UTC) 3661:18:22, 3 October 2005 (UTC) 3644:17:26, 3 October 2005 (UTC) 3619:04:40, 3 October 2005 (UTC) 2992:, we could as well replace 2536:23:23, 30 August 2005 (UTC) 2519:22:18, 30 August 2005 (UTC) 2504:19:12, 29 August 2005 (UTC) 2493:15:41, 29 August 2005 (UTC) 2419:00:53, 29 August 2005 (UTC) 2404:04:21, 28 August 2005 (UTC) 2394:00:17, 28 August 2005 (UTC) 2378:05:33, 27 August 2005 (UTC) 2364:05:33, 27 August 2005 (UTC) 2260:20:27, 26 August 2005 (UTC) 2239:20:27, 26 August 2005 (UTC) 2198:17:40, 26 August 2005 (UTC) 2169:00:14, 26 August 2005 (UTC) 2126:22:43, 25 August 2005 (UTC) 2095:21:43, 25 August 2005 (UTC) 2086:21:37, 25 August 2005 (UTC) 1322:19:22, 25 August 2005 (UTC) 891:and that's a huge category 631:List of mathematical topics 625:List of mathematical topics 619:23:43, 28 August 2005 (UTC) 575:Joke articles on PlanetMath 428:Mathematics bibliographies? 357:New articles on PlanetMath? 62:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 4990: 4945:Fraction of exponent rule 4833:12:20, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 4708:14:54, 23 March 2006 (UTC) 3349:I think we all agree that 2986:Knowledge article adequate 1897:{\displaystyle x\mapsto x} 1286:) 3 July 2005 16:35 (UTC) 1262:01:07, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC). 993:06:22, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC). 959:05:38, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC). 765:02:26, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC). 719:What do you guys think of 260:For older discussion, see 4955:21:57, 14 July 2021 (UTC) 4625:03:02, 6 March 2006 (UTC) 4597:02:04, 6 March 2006 (UTC) 4343:(and trigonomic version) 2449:User:Mathbot/Mapped links 2445:finite character, id=3692 2412:User:Mathbot/Mapped links 1759:for any other element of 1330:, this is what I got for 1266:Project covered in Quarto 1208:00:59, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC). 1199:01:14, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC) 1123:18:30, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC) 1085:01:20, Mar 13, 2005 (UTC) 1046:00:02, Mar 13, 2005 (UTC) 1012:04:31, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC) 919:04:47, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC). 860:03:03, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC) 849:03:50, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC). 836:03:11, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC). 809:02:58, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC) 795:03:11, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC). 783:02:52, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC) 710:02:56, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC) 702:07:44, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC) 637:02:28, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC). 607:06:24, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC). 590:17:15, Feb 2, 2005 (UTC) 558:06:35, Feb 2, 2005 (UTC) 529:23:59, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC) 500:06:47, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC). 492:21:35, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC) 484:21:20, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC) 443:19:46, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC) 434:bibliography for topology 424:17:58, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC) 405:19:32, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC) 398:17:46, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC) 368:15:31, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC) 353:23:01, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC). 309:13:39, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC). 187: 169: 92:Be welcoming to newcomers 4723:04:59, 6 June 2006 (UTC) 4660:02:10, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 4643:01:45, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 4351:Pascal's mystic hexagram 4348:Pappus's hexagon theorem 3580:reviewing any articles. 3562:others what to do :) -- 2912:Answers appreciated. :) 2298:"Vandal Fighter" program 1946:{\displaystyle \mapsto } 1301:July 3, 2005 20:25 (UTC) 1294:3 July 2005 20:09 (UTC) 1236:18:57, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC) 1220:18:41, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC) 1157:22:17, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC) 1141:21:48, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC) 1067:00:16, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC) 1020:05:13, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC) 976:06:14, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC) 942:05:13, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC) 899:04:14, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC) 872:03:19, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC) 689:/sg; # get <math: --> 685:/sg; # get <math: --> 508:06:56, Feb 2, 2005 (UTC) 464:20:31, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC) 455:19:53, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC) 327:15:32, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC) 4741:, id=6290 -- WP guess: 4681:Hello From AsteroidMeta 4221:link to plural anyway. 3318:I'm glad you mentioned 1371:be a set. A cycle is a 1054:not for their own sake. 667:12:03, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC) 655:02:39, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC) 570:16:00, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC) 541:02:03, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC) 387:16:09, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC) 342:16:09, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC) 283:whatsit random variable 275:whatsit random variable 218:WikiProject Mathematics 4323:(x3, one is included) 3824: 3813: 3802: 1977: 1947: 1927: 1926:{\displaystyle x\in S} 1907:for any other element 1898: 1866: 1776: 1753: 1752:{\displaystyle f(x)=x} 1715: 1557: 1456: 1436: 1365: 1290:Good to know. Thanks. 318:— see above thread on 291:normal random variable 87:avoid personal attacks 4309:Mollweide's equations 4299:double angle identity 4292:Brahmagupta's formula 4245:Missing table entries 3817: 3806: 3796: 1978: 1948: 1928: 1899: 1867: 1777: 1754: 1716: 1558: 1457: 1437: 1366: 694:\,/,\<\/math\: --> 692:\./.\<\/math\: --> 4687:Fortress of Solitude 4479:There's an image on 4315:Ptolemy's inequality 4302:Erdős-Anning Theorem 4102:I agree with Jitse. 3324:binomial coefficient 2984:Well, if we replace 2222:Category:Mathematics 2069:. It was very easy. 1964: 1937: 1911: 1882: 1791: 1763: 1728: 1573: 1469: 1446: 1387: 1355: 816:Paul, I just copied 688:$ 1\<\/math\: --> 684:$ 1\<\/math\: --> 279:whatsit distribution 241:mathematics articles 4838:Time for an update? 4321:Pythagorean theorem 4136:I found the culprit 3059:adequately covered 2333:dependence relation 2101:Cycle (mathematics) 2067:Cycle (mathematics) 2018:group (mathematics) 299:... random variable 287:normal distribution 4488: 4354:Desargues' theorem 4288:Apollonius theorem 4018:Done now, we have 3421:axiom of power set 2905:. See so and so... 2051:End of output text 1976:{\displaystyle f.} 1973: 1943: 1923: 1894: 1862: 1775:{\displaystyle S.} 1772: 1749: 1711: 1709: 1553: 1520: 1517: 1511: 1452: 1432: 1377:bijective function 1361: 1204:well; thank you! 1107:Needs to be copied 690:and </math: --> 686:and </math: --> 210:Mathematics portal 157:content assessment 98:dispute resolution 59: 4486: 4417: 4345:Menelaus' theorem 4337:bisectors theorem 4334:triangle theorems 4328:Stewart's theorem 4318:Ptolemy's theorem 4312:parallelogram law 4296:butterfly theorem 3854:Planet math links 3359:#Theorems, Proofs 3328:Pascal's triangle 3095: 3094: 3043:means PM article 2959:Duplicate entries 2727: 2726: 2631:all the work ;-) 2554:I think the sigs 2477:Statistics - perl 1516: 1455:{\displaystyle S} 1364:{\displaystyle S} 257: 256: 253: 252: 249: 248: 137: 136: 78:Assume good faith 55: 22:(Redirected from 4981: 4894: 4875:math wikiproject 4857:Yes, it's time. 4396: 4357:Morley's theorem 3330:. Now fixed. -- 3293:Rouche's theorem 3037: 2765:while (<: --> 2693: 2674:while (<: --> 2484:while (<: --> 1987:symmetric groups 1982: 1980: 1979: 1974: 1952: 1950: 1949: 1944: 1932: 1930: 1929: 1924: 1903: 1901: 1900: 1895: 1871: 1869: 1868: 1863: 1861: 1860: 1848: 1847: 1829: 1828: 1816: 1815: 1803: 1802: 1781: 1779: 1778: 1773: 1758: 1756: 1755: 1750: 1720: 1718: 1717: 1712: 1710: 1706: 1705: 1686: 1685: 1655: 1654: 1635: 1634: 1615: 1614: 1595: 1594: 1562: 1560: 1559: 1554: 1552: 1551: 1536: 1535: 1518: 1514: 1509: 1508: 1487: 1486: 1461: 1459: 1458: 1453: 1441: 1439: 1438: 1433: 1431: 1430: 1412: 1411: 1399: 1398: 1370: 1368: 1367: 1362: 1272:Wikimedia Quarto 1111:Not needed in WP 1103:Derivation/Proof 1025:Theorems, Proofs 663:on one page. -- 649:Oleg Alexandrov 601:Not needed on WP 564:Oleg Alexandrov 535:Oleg Alexandrov 381:Oleg Alexandrov 336:Oleg Alexandrov 303:... distribution 243: 242: 239: 236: 233: 212: 207: 206: 196: 189: 188: 178: 171: 148: 147: 146: 139: 131: 33: 27: 4989: 4988: 4984: 4983: 4982: 4980: 4979: 4978: 4959: 4958: 4943: 4915: 4897:Oleg Alexandrov 4892: 4879:Oleg Alexandrov 4844:Oleg Alexandrov 4840: 4818: 4786:Oleg Alexandrov 4731: 4700:Oleg Alexandrov 4683: 4589:Oleg Alexandrov 4533:Oleg Alexandrov 4520: 4477: 4426:Oleg Alexandrov 4305:Heron's formula 4282: 4280:Geometry proofs 4266:Oleg Alexandrov 4247: 4223:Oleg Alexandrov 4197:Oleg Alexandrov 4171:Oleg Alexandrov 4146:Oleg Alexandrov 4138: 4120:Oleg Alexandrov 4068:Oleg Alexandrov 4056: 4029:Oleg Alexandrov 4005:Oleg Alexandrov 3918:Oleg Alexandrov 3900:Oleg Alexandrov 3878: 3856: 3783: 3768:Oleg Alexandrov 3750:Oleg Alexandrov 3723:Oleg Alexandrov 3714:Oleg Alexandrov 3681:Oleg Alexandrov 3672:Oleg Alexandrov 3658:Oleg Alexandrov 3616:Oleg Alexandrov 3526:Oleg Alexandrov 3517: 3515:Automatic stats 3498:Oleg Alexandrov 3438:Oleg Alexandrov 3417: 3244:Oleg Alexandrov 3231:Oleg Alexandrov 3195:Oleg Alexandrov 3188: 3167:Oleg Alexandrov 3147:Oleg Alexandrov 3138:Oleg Alexandrov 3111:Oleg Alexandrov 3025:Oleg Alexandrov 3002:Oleg Alexandrov 2966:Oleg Alexandrov 2914:Oleg Alexandrov 2903:Duplicate entry 2882: 2872:Rich Farmbrough 2862:Oleg Alexandrov 2859: 2784:Oleg Alexandrov 2771:Rich Farmbrough 2767: 2763: 2750:Rich Farmbrough 2741:Oleg Alexandrov 2681:Rich Farmbrough 2676: 2672: 2655:Rich Farmbrough 2533:Oleg Alexandrov 2501:Oleg Alexandrov 2490:Rich Farmbrough 2486: 2479: 2457:Oleg Alexandrov 2416:Oleg Alexandrov 2401:Oleg Alexandrov 2391:Oleg Alexandrov 2375:Oleg Alexandrov 2361:Oleg Alexandrov 2352:"dynkin system" 2337:"dynkin system" 2257:Oleg Alexandrov 2236:Oleg Alexandrov 2195:Oleg Alexandrov 2166:Oleg Alexandrov 2123:Oleg Alexandrov 2092:Oleg Alexandrov 2083:Oleg Alexandrov 2008:symmetric group 1962: 1961: 1935: 1934: 1909: 1908: 1880: 1879: 1852: 1839: 1820: 1807: 1794: 1789: 1788: 1761: 1760: 1726: 1725: 1708: 1707: 1697: 1695: 1690: 1677: 1668: 1667: 1665: 1660: 1657: 1656: 1646: 1644: 1639: 1626: 1617: 1616: 1606: 1604: 1599: 1586: 1571: 1570: 1543: 1527: 1494: 1478: 1467: 1466: 1444: 1443: 1422: 1403: 1390: 1385: 1384: 1353: 1352: 1332:Id=2262 "Cycle" 1319:Oleg Alexandrov 1310: 1292:Oleg Alexandrov 1268: 1247: 1234:Oleg Alexandrov 1197:Oleg Alexandrov 1166: 1155:Oleg Alexandrov 1065:Oleg Alexandrov 1027: 1018:Oleg Alexandrov 1010:Oleg Alexandrov 999: 997:Encoding issues 983: 974:Oleg Alexandrov 940:Oleg Alexandrov 897:Oleg Alexandrov 717: 700:Oleg Alexandrov 696: 676: 627: 616:Rich Farmbrough 596: 577: 548: 519: 471: 430: 411: 359: 271: 240: 237: 234: 231: 230: 208: 201: 133: 132: 127: 104: 103: 73: 29: 28: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4987: 4985: 4977: 4976: 4971: 4961: 4960: 4942: 4939: 4914: 4911: 4910: 4909: 4908: 4907: 4889: 4839: 4836: 4817: 4814: 4813: 4812: 4811: 4810: 4797: 4796: 4781: 4780: 4779:on planetmath. 4764: 4763: 4747: 4746: 4730: 4727: 4726: 4725: 4711: 4710: 4682: 4679: 4678: 4677: 4676: 4675: 4663: 4662: 4636: 4635: 4634: 4633: 4632: 4631: 4630: 4629: 4628: 4627: 4606: 4605: 4604: 4603: 4602: 4601: 4600: 4599: 4585: 4552: 4551: 4519: 4516: 4515: 4514: 4493: 4476: 4475:Eep, an image! 4473: 4472: 4471: 4470: 4469: 4468: 4467: 4466: 4465: 4439: 4438: 4437: 4436: 4419: 4418: 4399:the preceding 4341:Ceva's theorem 4281: 4278: 4277: 4276: 4261: 4260: 4246: 4243: 4242: 4241: 4240: 4239: 4238: 4237: 4236: 4235: 4234: 4233: 4182: 4181: 4167: 4137: 4134: 4133: 4132: 4131: 4130: 4099: 4098: 4055: 4052: 4051: 4050: 4016: 4015: 3979: 3978: 3977: 3976: 3975: 3974: 3959: 3958: 3957: 3956: 3955: 3954: 3939: 3931: 3930: 3929: 3928: 3911: 3910: 3894: 3893: 3877: 3874: 3855: 3852: 3850: 3848: 3847: 3782: 3779: 3778: 3777: 3776: 3775: 3774: 3773: 3758: 3757: 3756: 3755: 3743: 3742: 3710: 3709: 3708: 3707: 3706: 3705: 3704: 3703: 3653: 3652: 3651: 3650: 3649: 3648: 3647: 3646: 3626: 3625: 3624: 3623: 3622: 3621: 3606: 3605: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3593: 3592: 3591: 3590: 3558: 3557: 3543: 3542: 3516: 3513: 3512: 3511: 3510: 3509: 3508: 3507: 3506: 3505: 3504: 3503: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3475: 3474: 3473: 3459: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3444: 3443: 3416: 3413: 3402: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3397: 3347: 3346: 3345: 3344: 3343: 3342: 3311: 3310: 3309: 3308: 3281: 3280: 3279: 3264: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3204: 3203: 3187: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3172: 3129: 3128: 3093: 3092: 3091:needs merging 3089: 3085: 3084: 3083:needs copying 3081: 3077: 3076: 3073: 3069: 3068: 3065: 3061: 3060: 3057: 3053: 3052: 3049: 3045: 3044: 3041: 3035: 3034: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3018: 2982: 2955: 2954: 2953: 2952: 2935: 2934: 2907: 2906: 2881: 2878: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2852: 2851: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2764: 2762: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2725: 2724: 2721: 2717: 2716: 2713: 2709: 2708: 2705: 2701: 2700: 2697: 2691: 2690: 2673: 2671: 2668: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2639: 2610: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2586: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2483: 2478: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2434: 2433: 2407: 2406: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2356: 2355: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2205:Cycle notation 2201: 2200: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2097: 2036: 2035: 2033:cycle notation 2030: 2028:dihedral group 2025: 2020: 2015: 2010: 2005: 1972: 1969: 1942: 1922: 1919: 1916: 1905: 1904: 1893: 1890: 1887: 1873: 1872: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1835: 1832: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1801: 1797: 1771: 1768: 1748: 1745: 1742: 1739: 1736: 1733: 1722: 1721: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1694: 1691: 1689: 1684: 1680: 1676: 1673: 1670: 1669: 1666: 1664: 1661: 1659: 1658: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1643: 1640: 1638: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1622: 1619: 1618: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1603: 1600: 1598: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1582: 1579: 1578: 1564: 1563: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1539: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1523: 1507: 1504: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1490: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1474: 1451: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1418: 1415: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1397: 1393: 1360: 1309: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1267: 1264: 1246: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1210: 1209: 1165: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1143: 1142: 1130: 1129: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1048: 1047: 1026: 1023: 1022: 1021: 998: 995: 982: 981:Status updates 979: 978: 977: 965: 964: 952: 951: 950: 949: 948: 947: 946: 945: 944: 943: 927: 926: 925: 924: 923: 922: 921: 920: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 876: 875: 874: 873: 862: 861: 853: 852: 851: 850: 840: 839: 838: 837: 825: 824: 823: 822: 811: 810: 799: 798: 797: 796: 785: 784: 776:amenable group 716: 713: 712: 711: 681: 675: 672: 671: 670: 669: 668: 657: 656: 644: 643: 626: 623: 622: 621: 595: 592: 576: 573: 572: 571: 547: 544: 543: 542: 518: 515: 514: 513: 512: 511: 510: 509: 470: 467: 466: 465: 457: 456: 429: 426: 410: 407: 389: 388: 375: 374: 358: 355: 346: 345: 344: 343: 329: 328: 270: 267: 255: 254: 251: 250: 247: 246: 244: 227:the discussion 214: 213: 197: 185: 184: 179: 167: 166: 160: 149: 135: 134: 125: 123: 122: 119: 118: 106: 105: 102: 101: 94: 89: 80: 74: 72: 71: 60: 51: 50: 47: 46: 45: 30: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4986: 4975: 4972: 4970: 4967: 4966: 4964: 4957: 4956: 4952: 4948: 4940: 4938: 4937: 4933: 4929: 4925: 4920: 4912: 4906: 4902: 4898: 4890: 4888: 4884: 4880: 4876: 4872: 4871:stats changes 4868: 4867: 4866: 4863: 4860: 4856: 4855: 4854: 4853: 4849: 4845: 4837: 4835: 4834: 4831: 4827: 4823: 4815: 4809: 4806: 4801: 4800: 4799: 4798: 4795: 4791: 4787: 4783: 4782: 4778: 4774: 4770: 4766: 4765: 4761: 4760: 4759: 4758: 4755: 4752: 4744: 4740: 4736: 4735: 4734: 4728: 4724: 4721: 4717: 4716: 4715: 4709: 4705: 4701: 4696: 4695: 4694: 4692: 4688: 4680: 4674: 4671: 4667: 4666: 4665: 4664: 4661: 4658: 4655: 4651: 4647: 4646: 4645: 4644: 4641: 4626: 4623: 4620: 4616: 4615: 4614: 4613: 4612: 4611: 4610: 4609: 4608: 4607: 4598: 4594: 4590: 4586: 4583: 4582: 4581: 4578: 4574: 4573: 4572: 4569: 4566: 4563: 4562: 4561: 4558: 4554: 4553: 4549: 4545: 4544: 4543: 4542: 4538: 4534: 4530: 4524: 4517: 4513: 4509: 4505: 4500: 4499: 4498: 4497: 4494: 4491: 4489: 4482: 4474: 4464: 4461: 4458: 4454: 4453: 4452: 4449: 4445: 4444: 4443: 4442: 4441: 4440: 4435: 4431: 4427: 4423: 4422: 4421: 4420: 4415: 4411: 4407: 4404: 4403:comment is by 4402: 4394: 4390: 4386: 4382: 4381: 4380: 4379: 4376: 4371: 4368: 4367: 4364: 4361: 4360:pivot theorem 4358: 4355: 4352: 4349: 4346: 4342: 4338: 4335: 4332: 4329: 4326: 4325:Simson's line 4322: 4319: 4316: 4313: 4310: 4306: 4303: 4300: 4297: 4293: 4289: 4285: 4279: 4275: 4271: 4267: 4263: 4262: 4258: 4257: 4256: 4255: 4252: 4244: 4232: 4228: 4224: 4219: 4218: 4217: 4216: 4215: 4212: 4208: 4207: 4206: 4202: 4198: 4194: 4193: 4192: 4189: 4184: 4183: 4180: 4176: 4172: 4168: 4166: 4163: 4158: 4157: 4156: 4155: 4151: 4147: 4143: 4135: 4129: 4125: 4121: 4117: 4113: 4112: 4111: 4108: 4105: 4101: 4100: 4097: 4093: 4089: 4084: 4080: 4079: 4078: 4077: 4073: 4069: 4065: 4061: 4053: 4049: 4046: 4041: 4040: 4039: 4038: 4034: 4030: 4025: 4021: 4014: 4010: 4006: 4002: 4001: 4000: 3999: 3996: 3993: 3988: 3984: 3973: 3970: 3965: 3964: 3963: 3962: 3961: 3960: 3953: 3949: 3945: 3940: 3937: 3936: 3935: 3934: 3933: 3932: 3927: 3923: 3919: 3915: 3914: 3913: 3912: 3909: 3905: 3901: 3896: 3895: 3890: 3889: 3888: 3887: 3884: 3875: 3873: 3872: 3869: 3865: 3861: 3853: 3851: 3846: 3842: 3838: 3834: 3830: 3829: 3828: 3823: 3822: 3816: 3812: 3811: 3805: 3801: 3800: 3795: 3793: 3791: 3781:PMEX and GFDL 3780: 3772: 3769: 3764: 3763: 3762: 3761: 3760: 3759: 3754: 3751: 3747: 3746: 3745: 3744: 3741: 3738: 3735: 3730: 3729: 3728: 3727: 3724: 3719: 3718: 3715: 3702: 3699: 3696: 3693:in the list! 3692: 3687: 3686: 3685: 3682: 3678: 3677: 3676: 3673: 3668: 3667: 3665: 3664: 3663: 3662: 3659: 3645: 3642: 3639: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3631: 3630: 3629: 3628: 3627: 3620: 3617: 3612: 3611: 3610: 3609: 3608: 3607: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3595: 3594: 3589: 3586: 3583: 3579: 3575: 3574: 3573: 3569: 3565: 3560: 3559: 3556: 3553: 3550: 3545: 3544: 3541: 3538: 3533: 3532: 3531: 3530: 3527: 3521: 3514: 3502: 3499: 3495: 3494: 3493: 3490: 3486: 3485: 3484: 3483: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3479: 3472: 3469: 3465: 3464: 3463: 3462: 3461: 3460: 3455: 3452: 3448: 3447: 3446: 3445: 3442: 3439: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3432: 3429: 3426: 3422: 3414: 3412: 3411: 3408: 3396: 3392: 3388: 3383: 3382: 3381: 3380: 3379: 3378: 3377: 3375: 3372: 3368: 3364: 3360: 3356: 3352: 3341: 3337: 3333: 3329: 3325: 3321: 3320:Pascal's rule 3317: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3313: 3312: 3307: 3303: 3299: 3294: 3290: 3289:Pascal's rule 3286: 3282: 3278: 3274: 3270: 3265: 3262: 3258: 3257: 3256: 3255: 3254: 3253: 3248: 3245: 3241: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3232: 3227: 3226: 3225: 3224: 3221: 3217: 3213: 3209: 3201: 3200: 3196: 3190: 3189: 3185: 3171: 3168: 3164: 3163: 3161: 3158: 3154: 3153: 3151: 3148: 3144: 3143: 3142: 3139: 3135: 3134: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3126: 3123: 3118: 3117: 3116: 3115: 3112: 3108: 3104: 3099: 3090: 3087: 3086: 3082: 3079: 3078: 3074: 3071: 3070: 3066: 3063: 3062: 3058: 3055: 3054: 3050: 3047: 3046: 3042: 3039: 3038: 3032: 3031: 3030: 3029: 3026: 3016: 3013: 3008: 3007: 3006: 3003: 2999: 2995: 2994:Needs copying 2991: 2987: 2983: 2980: 2977: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2967: 2962: 2960: 2951: 2947: 2943: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2932: 2929: 2925: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2915: 2910: 2904: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2896: 2893: 2891: 2885: 2879: 2877: 2876: 2873: 2867: 2866: 2863: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2830: 2827: 2822: 2821: 2820: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2812: 2808: 2804: 2800: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2788: 2785: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2772: 2760: 2754: 2751: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2742: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2734: 2731: 2722: 2719: 2715:All reviewed 2714: 2711: 2706: 2703: 2698: 2695: 2694: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2682: 2669: 2659: 2656: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2637: 2634: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2623: 2619: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2595: 2592: 2587: 2584: 2581: 2577: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2568: 2565: 2561: 2557: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2537: 2534: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2520: 2516: 2512: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2502: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2491: 2482: 2476: 2471: 2468: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2446: 2441: 2439: 2431: 2428: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2417: 2413: 2405: 2402: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2392: 2388: 2379: 2376: 2372: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2362: 2358: 2357: 2353: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2345: 2342: 2338: 2334: 2322: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2306: 2303: 2299: 2294: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2279: 2276: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2261: 2258: 2254: 2253: 2251: 2246: 2245: 2240: 2237: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2223: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2213: 2210: 2206: 2199: 2196: 2192: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2184: 2181: 2170: 2167: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2148: 2145: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2127: 2124: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2109: 2106: 2102: 2098: 2096: 2093: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2084: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2075: 2072: 2068: 2063: 2061: 2058: 2054: 2052: 2048: 2046: 2042: 2034: 2031: 2029: 2026: 2024: 2021: 2019: 2016: 2014: 2013:transposition 2011: 2009: 2006: 2004: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1994: 1992: 1988: 1983: 1970: 1967: 1959: 1955: 1920: 1917: 1914: 1891: 1885: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1857: 1853: 1844: 1840: 1833: 1825: 1821: 1812: 1808: 1799: 1795: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1782: 1769: 1766: 1746: 1743: 1737: 1731: 1702: 1698: 1692: 1682: 1678: 1671: 1662: 1651: 1647: 1641: 1631: 1627: 1620: 1611: 1607: 1601: 1591: 1587: 1580: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1532: 1528: 1521: 1505: 1502: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1483: 1479: 1472: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1449: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1416: 1413: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1395: 1391: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1358: 1349: 1347: 1342: 1340: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1324: 1323: 1320: 1316: 1307: 1300: 1296: 1295: 1293: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1265: 1263: 1261: 1256: 1252: 1244: 1235: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1219: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1207: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1198: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1175: 1170: 1163: 1156: 1152: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1131: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1122: 1118: 1115: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1099: 1095: 1084: 1081: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1066: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1033: 1024: 1019: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1011: 1007: 1002: 996: 994: 992: 988: 980: 975: 971: 967: 966: 962: 961: 960: 958: 941: 937: 936: 935: 934: 933: 932: 931: 930: 929: 928: 918: 913: 912: 911: 910: 909: 908: 907: 906: 898: 894: 890: 886: 882: 881: 880: 879: 878: 877: 871: 866: 865: 864: 863: 859: 855: 854: 848: 844: 843: 842: 841: 835: 829: 828: 827: 826: 819: 815: 814: 813: 812: 808: 805: 801: 800: 794: 789: 788: 787: 786: 782: 777: 773: 772:User:Dbenbenn 768: 767: 766: 764: 759: 757: 753: 752:More complete 749: 745: 741: 736: 734: 727: 724: 722: 714: 709: 705: 704: 703: 701: 680: 673: 666: 661: 660: 659: 658: 654: 650: 646: 645: 640: 639: 638: 636: 632: 624: 620: 617: 614: 610: 609: 608: 606: 602: 593: 591: 589: 584: 581: 574: 569: 565: 561: 560: 559: 557: 553: 540: 536: 532: 531: 530: 528: 524: 516: 507: 502: 501: 499: 494: 493: 491: 487: 486: 485: 483: 479: 476: 463: 459: 458: 454: 450: 446: 445: 444: 442: 439: 435: 427: 425: 423: 420: 416: 413:I've updated 408: 406: 404: 399: 397: 394: 386: 382: 377: 376: 371: 370: 369: 367: 364: 356: 354: 352: 341: 337: 333: 332: 331: 330: 326: 323: 321: 317: 312: 311: 310: 308: 304: 300: 296: 292: 288: 284: 280: 276: 268: 266: 264: 263: 245: 228: 224: 220: 219: 211: 205: 200: 198: 195: 191: 190: 186: 183: 180: 177: 173: 168: 164: 158: 154: 150: 141: 140: 121: 120: 117: 114: 112: 108: 107: 99: 95: 93: 90: 88: 84: 81: 79: 76: 75: 69: 65: 64:Learn to edit 61: 58: 53: 52: 49: 48: 43: 39: 35: 34: 25: 19: 4947:Emizah Mah Z 4944: 4916: 4841: 4819: 4776: 4748: 4732: 4712: 4684: 4637: 4547: 4528: 4525: 4521: 4504:Jitse Niesen 4478: 4398: 4372: 4369: 4331:tangents law 4286: 4283: 4248: 4139: 4115: 4088:Jitse Niesen 4063: 4059: 4057: 4017: 3982: 3980: 3944:Jitse Niesen 3879: 3857: 3849: 3837:Jitse Niesen 3825: 3819: 3818: 3814: 3808: 3807: 3803: 3798: 3797: 3789: 3784: 3720: 3711: 3690: 3654: 3577: 3564:Jitse Niesen 3522: 3518: 3418: 3403: 3387:Jitse Niesen 3366: 3354: 3350: 3348: 3332:Jitse Niesen 3284: 3269:Jitse Niesen 3260: 3239: 3215: 3211: 3205: 3192: 3186:PMEX Proofs? 3106: 3100: 3096: 3022: 2997: 2993: 2989: 2988:with simply 2985: 2963: 2958: 2956: 2942:Jitse Niesen 2911: 2908: 2902: 2897: 2894: 2886: 2883: 2868: 2860: 2803:Jitse Niesen 2768: 2728: 2699:Not started 2677: 2618:Jitse Niesen 2575: 2559: 2555: 2511:Jitse Niesen 2487: 2480: 2442: 2435: 2408: 2384: 2330: 2202: 2177: 2064: 2055: 2050: 2038: 2037: 1996: 1995: 1984: 1906: 1874: 1783: 1723: 1565: 1462:such that 1350: 1345: 1343: 1327: 1325: 1311: 1280:Jitse Niesen 1269: 1248: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1171: 1167: 1139:Jitse Niesen 1110: 1106: 1102: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1080:Paul August 1039: 1028: 1003: 1000: 984: 953: 892: 888: 884: 804:Paul August 760: 755: 751: 747: 743: 730: 728: 725: 718: 697: 677: 665:Jitse Niesen 628: 600: 597: 578: 549: 520: 472: 438:Paul August 431: 419:Paul August 412: 400: 393:Paul August 390: 363:Paul August 360: 347: 319: 313: 302: 298: 282: 278: 274: 272: 259: 258: 216: 163:WikiProjects 153:project page 152: 109: 36:This is the 4924:b:Wikibooks 4859:Paul August 4751:Paul August 4654:Paul August 4619:Paul August 4577:AdamSmithee 4557:AdamSmithee 4457:Paul August 4448:AdamSmithee 4406:Paul August 4104:Paul August 3992:Paul August 3734:Paul August 3695:Paul August 3638:Paul August 3582:Paul August 3549:Paul August 3425:Paul August 3371:Paul August 3157:Paul August 3122:Paul August 3105:instead of 3051:not needed 3012:Paul August 2976:Paul August 2928:Paul August 2826:Paul August 2730:Paul August 2633:Paul August 2591:Paul August 2580:Paul August 2564:Paul August 2467:Paul August 2427:Paul August 2371:real number 2341:Paul August 2302:Paul August 2275:Paul August 2209:Paul August 2180:Paul August 2144:Paul August 2105:Paul August 2071:Paul August 2057:Paul August 2003:permutation 1373:permutation 1336:Paul August 774:noted that 232:Mathematics 223:mathematics 182:Mathematics 4963:Categories 4745:-- Status: 4366:Euler line 4188:Ben Cairns 4162:Ben Cairns 4064:not needed 4062:, meaning 3468:CryptoDerk 3451:CryptoDerk 3216:not needed 3210:status of 2350:Fixed the 2321:CryptoDerk 2250:CryptoDerk 2191:congruence 2041:PlanetMath 1954:represents 1299:CryptoDerk 1260:Ben Cairns 1206:Ben Cairns 1044:CryptoDerk 1032:User:linas 991:Ben Cairns 957:Ben Cairns 917:Ben Cairns 870:Ben Cairns 858:CryptoDerk 847:Ben Cairns 834:Ben Cairns 793:Ben Cairns 781:CryptoDerk 763:Ben Cairns 715:Statistics 708:CryptoDerk 635:Ben Cairns 605:Ben Cairns 588:CryptoDerk 556:CryptoDerk 527:CryptoDerk 506:CryptoDerk 498:Ben Cairns 490:CryptoDerk 482:CryptoDerk 462:CryptoDerk 453:CryptoDerk 403:CryptoDerk 391:Great ;-) 351:Ben Cairns 325:CryptoDerk 320:Talk pages 307:Ben Cairns 3892:request). 3790:embedding 2761:Version 3 2723:Complete 2670:Version 2 1993:cycles. 1566:that is 1379:of a set 295:long time 262:Archive 1 100:if needed 83:Be polite 38:talk page 4414:contribs 4401:unsigned 3283:I think 2707:Started 2465:Ah yes. 2293:barnstar 2023:subgroup 1997:See also 1991:disjoint 1933:, where 761:Cheers, 756:Adequate 289:but not 111:Archives 68:get help 4777:missing 4568:Mathbot 4492:Simpson 3821:usable. 3691:nowhere 3361:and at 3298:☺drini♫ 3208:WP:PMEX 3075:merged 3067:copied 4928:Arided 4830:Jheald 4487:Corbin 4251:Jtwdog 4211:Jtwdog 4045:Jtwdog 3985:write 3969:Jtwdog 3883:Jtwdog 3537:Jtwdog 3355:so far 3040:Status 2739:Nice! 2704:Yellow 2453:subset 1958:action 1875:and 750:, not 748:Copied 744:Merged 679:here. 159:scale. 4805:linas 4720:linas 4670:linas 4640:linas 4375:Jeekc 4339:(x2) 4290:(x2) 3987:above 3835:. -- 3792:entry 3788:PM's 3489:linas 3407:linas 3261:Proof 3240:Proof 3220:linas 3212:Proof 2996:with 2720:Green 2451:) to 1278:. -- 1218:linas 1121:linas 885:quite 151:This 96:Seek 44:page. 16:< 4951:talk 4941:Math 4932:talk 4901:talk 4893:new! 4883:talk 4848:talk 4790:talk 4737:PM: 4704:talk 4650:this 4593:talk 4537:talk 4508:talk 4430:talk 4410:talk 4391:and 4270:talk 4227:talk 4201:talk 4175:talk 4150:talk 4124:talk 4092:talk 4072:talk 4033:talk 4022:and 4009:talk 3948:talk 3922:talk 3904:talk 3864:here 3858:The 3841:talk 3578:them 3568:talk 3391:talk 3351:some 3336:talk 3285:some 3273:talk 2946:talk 2807:talk 2696:Grey 2622:talk 2576:much 2560:when 2515:talk 1956:the 1724:and 1381:onto 1351:Let 1315:link 1284:talk 1276:here 1253:and 1119:. 1116:and 653:talk 582:and 568:talk 539:talk 477:and 385:talk 340:talk 85:and 4828:. 3983:did 3868:Tob 3326:or 3197:at 2712:Tan 2556:are 1960:of 1515:and 1442:of 970:wix 831:--> 754:or 746:or 642:it. 301:to 265:ok 4965:: 4953:) 4934:) 4903:) 4885:) 4877:. 4850:) 4792:) 4706:) 4652:) 4595:) 4539:) 4510:) 4432:) 4416:) 4412:• 4395:. 4307:* 4294:* 4272:) 4229:) 4203:) 4177:) 4152:) 4126:) 4094:) 4074:) 4035:) 4011:) 3950:) 3924:) 3906:) 3843:) 3570:) 3393:) 3338:) 3304:) 3275:) 3152:) 3109:. 3088:NM 3080:NC 2998:NC 2990:OK 2948:) 2809:) 2624:) 2562:. 2517:) 2207:. 2103:. 2053:) 1941:↦ 1918:∈ 1889:↦ 1850:↦ 1837:↦ 1834:⋯ 1831:↦ 1818:↦ 1805:↦ 1663:⋮ 1417:… 1348:) 1317:. 1153:. 1034:) 651:| 566:| 537:| 383:| 338:| 66:; 4949:( 4930:( 4899:( 4881:( 4862:☎ 4846:( 4788:( 4754:☎ 4702:( 4657:☎ 4622:☎ 4591:( 4548:N 4535:( 4529:P 4506:( 4460:☎ 4428:( 4408:( 4397:— 4268:( 4225:( 4199:( 4173:( 4148:( 4122:( 4116:N 4107:☎ 4090:( 4070:( 4060:N 4031:( 4007:( 3995:☎ 3946:( 3920:( 3902:( 3839:( 3737:☎ 3698:☎ 3641:☎ 3585:☎ 3566:( 3552:☎ 3428:☎ 3389:( 3374:☎ 3334:( 3302:☎ 3300:| 3296:( 3271:( 3263:. 3202:) 3191:( 3160:☎ 3125:☎ 3072:M 3064:C 3056:A 3048:N 3015:☎ 2979:☎ 2944:( 2931:☎ 2829:☎ 2805:( 2733:☎ 2636:☎ 2620:( 2594:☎ 2583:☎ 2567:☎ 2513:( 2470:☎ 2430:☎ 2344:☎ 2305:☎ 2278:☎ 2212:☎ 2183:☎ 2147:☎ 2108:☎ 2074:☎ 2060:☎ 2049:( 2047:. 1971:. 1968:f 1921:S 1915:x 1892:x 1886:x 1858:1 1854:a 1845:k 1841:a 1826:3 1822:a 1813:2 1809:a 1800:1 1796:a 1770:. 1767:S 1747:x 1744:= 1741:) 1738:x 1735:( 1732:f 1703:1 1699:a 1693:= 1688:) 1683:k 1679:a 1675:( 1672:f 1652:3 1648:a 1642:= 1637:) 1632:2 1628:a 1624:( 1621:f 1612:2 1608:a 1602:= 1597:) 1592:1 1588:a 1584:( 1581:f 1549:1 1545:a 1541:= 1538:) 1533:k 1529:a 1525:( 1522:f 1506:1 1503:+ 1500:i 1496:a 1492:= 1489:) 1484:i 1480:a 1476:( 1473:f 1450:S 1428:k 1424:a 1420:, 1414:, 1409:2 1405:a 1401:, 1396:1 1392:a 1375:( 1359:S 1344:( 1339:☎ 1282:( 1083:☎ 807:☎ 441:☎ 422:☎ 396:☎ 366:☎ 322:. 165:: 116:1 113:: 70:. 26:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:WikiProject Mathematics/PlanetMath Exchange - Knowledge

Index