User talk:Cyfin - Knowledge (XXG)

309:, meaning that you were bold in doing what you felt was right for the encyclopedia. And in the long run, having an article for Albedo, a major villain in two (perhaps three) hit games, is justified and appropriate. I only see one major problem with the article, and that's the minor amounts of speculation and original research, mainly dealing with the testament issue. Current events and ongoing events are always difficult to cover on Knowledge (XXG), so it's fine. It was actually a great thing, because it woke us up to the fact that Xenosaga is starting to swing back around in popularity, especially with the upcoming release of Episode III. 1084: 1022: 715:. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. 1336: 1200: 276:

Yeah, I was planning to do the minor edits. Sorry I'm being such a bother about this Albedo topic...I just really think it should stay up. I wouldn't have written it if I knew people were more for having Albedo remain on the listed villains. I just figured that nobody ever got around to writing

388:

Nice, that's how I learned about Knowledge (XXG), as well. I believe my first edit was creating the original Proto Merkabah article. Originally, there was about 80 Xenosaga pages, but people felt that it would be better if they were in lists by topic, instead of paragraph articles. That way, it's

229:

It does take a while to get used to, but there is plenty of stuff you can work on; you can always make a series of minor edits, fix factual errors, help out with the Xenosaga pages. There are a lot of policies to read, but usually you'll encounter some of them after accidently violating them.

340:

Not at all. We'll probably work on changing the plot summary into a detailed overview if people really want us to, but you are in no way being a bother. It's very rare that a user's first edit is creating a respectable article with solid information, which you have pretty much done.

454:

Hehe, that's cool! I actually had a lot of fun looking through all the lists in search of specific things though, I actually learned a few things about a game I'm obsessed with. And yeah, I had fixed up the Krelian article a bit with an IP address before I got an account.

90:

Just a heads up: it's a good idea to discuss splits on the talk page and with the users maintaining the article. Also, is there a reason for the name change? I noticed several versions of Albedo's last name get hits, but where did you get this one specifically? Thanks.

322:

Yeah...I was just saying why his being a Testament is a possibility. I understand if it's sort of testing the limits. As for everything else in the article, I pretty much described every scene he was in, so hopefully I don't have too much speculation in there.

362:

Heh, thanks. That's why I'm so big on keeping it up and running, it took me forever to type it up, AND to figure out how to make those links, AND find where all the links should lead to...I pretty much learned a lot about Knowledge (XXG) WHILE typing it.

1393:

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to

1257:

1431:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in

1295:

633:

Each list is going to have its own subpage in my userspace while I make the changes from there. The lists themselves will be tagged with the "Inuse" template, which lets people know that a major edit is being made.

1160:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 980:. At this moment, it is all hidden as most of it still talks about Amanda, but if you could help and get sources and maybe post them on that talk page, that'd be awesome. Any question? Just let me know. -- 946: