18:
56:, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Knowledge is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.
52:
from editing
Knowledge. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the
37:, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
83:
29:
other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on
Knowledge this is known as "
67:
49:
78:
34:
53:
30:
22:
42:
73:
38:
26:
48:
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be
60:
17:
90:
70:
from the article was because the category doesn't exist anymore.
8:
33:" and is usually seen as obstructing the
68:Category:African-American conservatism
7:
14:
16:
25:. You appear to be repeatedly
1:
66:Hi, the reason why I removed
106:
91:02:02, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
35:normal editing process
27:reverting or undoing
23:welcome to Knowledge
54:three-revert rule
97:
86:
81:
76:
20:
105:
104:
100:
99:
98:
96:
95:
94:
84:
79:
74:
64:
12:
11:
5:
103:
101:
63:
58:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
102:
93:
92:
89:
88:
87:
82:
77:
69:
62:
59:
57:
55:
51:
46:
44:
40:
36:
32:
28:
24:
19:
75:bibliomaniac
72:
71:
65:
47:
31:edit warring
15:
21:Hello, and
61:Tim Scott
43:talk page
39:consensus
50:blocked
41:on the
45:.
85:5
80:1
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
