Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:DBaba

Source đź“ť

425:
happened, despite it being a well-documented part of his life in the media eye. So it's not just that I think that it should be mentioned, and that I see it (his involvement in the LGBT community, generally) reflected in the media alongside his name over the years, it's that many people active in the media want to conceal this about Lamo, in order to advance their political interests and in order to hurt him. (One Knowledge (XXG) editor, while editing Lamo's page hostilely,
326:
Martiniquans as a people. Fanon always considered himself as a French man. So, not only is "Martiniquan" incorrect regarding WP rules on nationality, but it is unacceptable, as it gives an impression which is very different from the reality : Martinique is not (and was not at his time) a colony (Fanon went to school as all French children), and Fanon never defended that opinion. AND there is nothing controversial about that.
803: 742: 475: 21: 622: 574:
broader article, with a strong citation. I find that the citation is weak because the cited website states at the bottom that this was a history paper of a college student for History 101. I don't doubt that a professional citation exists, I'd just like to see it referenced, and perhaps also given more context.
386:
I appreciate your point, but I think you misread the citation. I added a citation which was not a primary document, and it was that citation that you most recently blanked. The significance of his involvement with the LGBT community is multifaceted, but suffice it to say that because the media has
617:
Hi RolandR, thanks for your inquiry. I don't remember making the edit, or even the individual in question, but I can see what my logic was. I'm sure I came to the suspicious, uncited assertion that "he had accepted large sums of funding from the CIA without disclosing the fact" and, flagging that
420:
I see what you're saying. To me, though, it looks like blanking Lamo's involvement in the LGBT community not only distorts the image of Lamo as captured in the media for many years, it's actually part of a program of defaming him. I don't mean to suggest that that's what you mean to do, it's just
349:
I want you not to misunderstand. I am not disagreeing with you necessarily, only showing you that your view is one of several views. I am familiar with Fanon's earlier writing about his French identity, too. 'We Algerians', this is regarded as a sort of conclusion, though, by some scholars. I'm
345:
Do you believe, I wonder, that he is speaking as a Frenchman when he uses the words "We Algerians..."? Michael Azar writes, "It is clear already from how Fanon locates his own “I”: it is no longer “we Frenchmen,” or “we Martinicans,” but rather “we Algerians.” Fanon has chosen to take part in this
629:
Anyway, that's how I'd do it, if I were making a single, quick edit to a page of a dude I'm soon to forget, now. Oh, I dislike a lot about the article, looking at it, but I'm just not terribly interested in it, and don't even understand what Campus Watch's angle was on that one. Yawn! Anything
573:
Hi! Regarding that rollback, I found the material inappropriate for the opening, because it presents a view that is not typical, common, or central to the historical memory. That is, I would not expect to find that in a book on the subject... I agree that it would be worthy of inclusion in the
405:
I see what you mean. but the source cited merely retails, without confirmation, what Boing Boing has said; I still think it's marginal on notability grounds here - if we are going to speculate (or report speculation) on why Bradley Manning confided in Adrian Lamo I think that belongs on Manning's
381:
If the only reliable source for his appointment is a primary document, then that suggests that it is a fact that is insufficiently notable for inclusion. We might expect newspapers to report on this if it was: as it is this is effectively Original Research - there is more detailed information on
424:
Does that make sense? If his critics from within the LGBT community (e.g., Greenwald) seek to destroy him, that's precisely what they have to omit from their op-eds, except when that involvement can be used to smear him as a traitor. His passionate critics want to pretend that this stuff never
325:
This article was full of lies a few weeks ago, even propagating the false information that his name would be "Frantz Omar Fanon". I know Fanon, his life and his works quite well, and read all his books (in French). You could not find a word from him speaking of Martinique as a Nation, and of
215: 217:
I don't know if he's tactless or if he just wants to tweak Chinese nationalists by choosing that word. Dramatization, exaggeration, uncertainty; a parable, true in symbol, uncertain in detail; there are plenty of more accurate, less confrontational ways to make the point!
506:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on 551:
This was published in university press, with books as sources. And why is the lead undue? The idea is to show that while the general opinion is that the internment happened because of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, the President actually ordered the lists
768:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
391:, which asks the obvious question: "Did Lamo—who was once appointed to San Francisco's Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender, Queer and Questioning Youth Task Force—trade on Manning's gender or sexual struggles to win over his trust, and his confession?" Cheers, 277:
Wow, I didn't know about that. I had a spat with Mhazard9 because I felt his/her edits were biased. Good thing it got sorted. I think your approach in relaying the criticism is accurate and appropriate; Hilberg pretty much said it all with his comments.
43: 255:
Thanks a lot. It's a tough article. Some of the criticism he faces is so intense, I don't even know how to integrate it. And it doesn't help that his fan or publicist is trying to promote him on Knowledge (XXG) using dishonest tactics:
155:
Thank you for improving the article, especially your changes to the lede which are quite good. One of the sentences that you introduced to the lede uses the phrase "seeking to invalidate the historiography of the
772:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
697:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 213:
Are you very familiar with the 'contest' historiography? Is Wakabayashi not insensitive for using the word 'fabrication' in his work, for its association with revisionist accounts of the massacre on the whole?
660: 301: 73:
Thanks for the heads up. It's too bad, this sort of behavior. I took it to Sockpuppet investigation, hopefully that'll sort it out. I put a lot of work into the stuff, thanks for lookin out! Cheers,
502:
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
421:
my perception of the function of that omission. He has been the homeless hacker who cares about the gay community for a long time, and now he's being transformed into something else by his critics.
765: 387:
made an issue of it, and because the citations are available, it would be peculiar to omit it from his Knowledge (XXG) bio. Glen Greenwald concluded one of his articles with a link to
190:
and consider if there is a useful way to link to it? I think that article has information that is relevant to the topic of this article but I'm not quite sure how best to refer to it.
932: 927: 621:
Based on the formatting of the citation, it looks like I came to the Campus Watch entry and, knowing the unreliability of Campus Watch, used Google Scholar to verify the text
382:
Knowledge (XXG) than anywhere else. I can only assume that some editors are keen to flag it up as a way of highlighting his sexual orientation, breaching BLP policy.
350:
glad to meet someone who feels passionate about his Fanon. I hope you can be more patient with other editors, however! Sometimes they have a point, too. Cheers,
406:
page not Lamo's. Maybe I'm being over-critical - Lamo's page has been the target of so much negative BLP-ing that blandness and brevity seem the best approach.
208:
I added a 'see also'. I don't know if that's enough, but it's a link at least. I'll have to play around with that Historiography article at some point. Thanks!
496: 754: 864: 507: 240:
Thank you for your great work on improving this article. I had abandonded it in lack of stamina, and you made it look regal in format and substance.
149: 548:, Anthropologist to the President, to produce a list with names and addresses of all American-born and foreign-born Japanese residing in America. 448:
From my point of view his only claim for notability is as a hacker; I wouldn't have considered his LGBT work as significant, but maybe I'm worn.
187: 172: 168: 515: 722: 511: 537:
Hi. I just wanted to ask why exactly you considered the following as "weak quote, UNDUE lead" in the Japanese internment camps article.
491:
but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge (XXG) constitutes fair use. Please go to
35:. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. 868: 432: 597: 27: 718: 856: 814: 792: 388: 860: 116:
I'd love to take a look at it. Nice to see Kabandha got Good article status! It couldn't have without your great work.
545: 758: 709:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
714: 503: 843: 600:
about the source for a citation you included in the article. Your contribution to this discussion would be welcome.
257: 96:
Can you please go through the article and help it achieve the language standards of GA, as you did in the article
656: 646: 810: 796: 749: 733: 309: 234: 198: 872: 710: 665: 541: 331: 488: 908: 624:(the dating appears to be derived in part from copying the Campus Watch formatting, "August 2, 2005"). 890: 492: 483: 283: 245: 686: 677: 563: 523: 706: 690: 453: 411: 374: 101: 880: 839: 780: 606: 305: 194: 702: 694: 259:. I expect that this person's interest is vested enough that s/he will return to try again. 327: 180: 176: 161: 157: 135: 105: 62: 826: 705:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 698: 649: 886: 514:
and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the
279: 241: 619: 559: 519: 825:
While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be
655:
Hi, you might, as a major contributing editor, be interested to know that the article
921: 449: 407: 370: 53:
Hi DBaba, just noticed something that could be of interest to you. The IP that did "
776: 602: 590: 319: 431:
where he featured an article, 'Bradley Manning and the stench of US hypocrisy'.
631: 575: 435: 392: 351: 260: 219: 117: 75: 42: 20: 90: 179:
but I reconsidered doing that because it's critical that we have a link to
57:" with the summary "Reverted edit war between DBaba and MHzard9", also did 97: 879:
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the
693:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
487:. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under 171:. I thought about changing the sentence referenced above to link to 302:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Justus Weiner (2nd nomination)
346:
new historical formation... as the foundation for a new humanism."
894: 786: 726: 671: 639: 611: 583: 567: 527: 457: 443: 415: 400: 378: 359: 335: 313: 287: 268: 249: 227: 202: 167:
I was wondering if you were aware that there is an article titled
140: 125: 110: 83: 67: 766:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Gangstar (disambiguation)
15: 801: 473: 429: 104:, where the reviewer notes your contribution to Kabandha.-- 753:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to
867:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
849:
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing
747:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
426: 58: 54: 832:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
618:
in my mind, looked into it with a cursory web search.
510:. If the file is already gone, you can still make a 909:
The Internment and Relocation of Japanese-Americans
685:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 428:linked to his blog from his Knowledge (XXG) page, 61:in another article. Just a friendly heads up.-- 8: 933:Wikipedians who opt out of template messages 186:Could you take a look at the article on the 928:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery 160:" with a wikilink to the article about the 755:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 481:Thanks for uploading or contributing to 150:Contest to kill 100 people using a sword 912:". Indiana University South Bend Press. 899: 838:notice, but please explain why in your 31:. DBaba has not edited Knowledge (XXG) 28:This user may have left Knowledge (XXG) 470:Fair use rationale for File:Kyclay.jpg 188:Historiography of the Nanking Massacre 173:Historiography of the Nanking Massacre 169:Historiography of the Nanking Massacre 7: 883:of each individual file for details. 827:deleted for any of several reasons 817:because of the following concern: 630:more I can offer, please do ask! 14: 852:{{proposed deletion/dated files}} 835:{{proposed deletion/dated files}} 764:The article will be discussed at 711:review the candidates' statements 134:Thanks for the quick response. -- 740: 540:On November 26, 1941, president 41: 19: 821:unused, low-res, no obvious use 717:. For the Election committee, 687:Arbitration Committee election 678:ArbCom elections are now open! 516:Media copyright questions page 228:02:59, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 203:04:45, 28 September 2010 (UTC) 141:16:04, 24 September 2010 (UTC) 126:16:58, 23 September 2010 (UTC) 111:16:43, 23 September 2010 (UTC) 1: 727:13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 596:There is a discussion on the 288:07:32, 30 November 2010 (UTC) 269:18:43, 29 November 2010 (UTC) 250:23:56, 27 November 2010 (UTC) 895:01:00, 27 January 2020 (UTC) 672:11:43, 17 January 2012 (UTC) 640:04:37, 29 October 2011 (UTC) 612:11:57, 28 October 2011 (UTC) 584:02:17, 15 October 2011 (UTC) 568:07:30, 13 October 2011 (UTC) 508:criteria for speedy deletion 296:AfD of article you worked on 871:allows discussion to reach 787:10:36, 5 January 2019 (UTC) 713:and submit your choices on 84:19:37, 23 August 2010 (UTC) 68:09:37, 21 August 2010 (UTC) 949: 863:exist. In particular, the 811:File:Frannnnnnkenstein.JPG 797:File:Frannnnnnkenstein.JPG 719:MediaWiki message delivery 458:18:57, 23 April 2011 (UTC) 444:18:39, 23 April 2011 (UTC) 416:08:11, 23 April 2011 (UTC) 401:06:33, 23 April 2011 (UTC) 379:20:55, 22 April 2011 (UTC) 360:05:14, 12 April 2011 (UTC) 314:04:38, 17 March 2011 (UTC) 857:proposed deletion process 750:Gangstar (disambiguation) 734:Gangstar (disambiguation) 657:Consolation of Philosophy 647:Consolation of Philosophy 528:16:08, 13 June 2011 (UTC) 495:and edit it to include a 493:the file description page 336:16:06, 3 April 2011 (UTC) 757:or whether it should be 635: 579: 439: 396: 355: 264: 223: 121: 79: 906:Michael Anica Meller. " 598:citing sources talkpage 341:Our ancestors the Gauls 823: 806: 512:request for undeletion 478: 365:Adrian Lamo LGBT board 235:Daniel Jonah Goldhagen 819: 815:proposed for deletion 805: 691:Arbitration Committee 542:Franklin D. Roosevelt 477: 869:files for discussion 844:the file's talk page 695:arbitration process 661:Good Article Review 183:early in the lede. 861:deletion processes 807: 707:arbitration policy 497:fair use rationale 479: 102:Talk:Mandodari/GA1 33:since October 2011 793:Proposed deletion 784: 39: 38: 940: 913: 904: 884: 854: 853: 837: 836: 804: 775: 744: 743: 668: 659:is now up for a 610: 533:about a rollback 504:my contributions 476: 181:Nanking Massacre 177:Nanking Massacre 162:Nanking Massacre 158:Nanking Massacre 138: 108: 45: 23: 16: 948: 947: 943: 942: 941: 939: 938: 937: 918: 917: 916: 905: 901: 878: 865:speedy deletion 851: 850: 834: 833: 802: 800: 785: 745: 741: 738: 715:the voting page 681: 666: 653: 601: 594: 535: 484:File:Kyclay.jpg 474: 472: 367: 343: 323: 298: 238: 153: 136: 106: 94: 51: 12: 11: 5: 946: 944: 936: 935: 930: 920: 919: 915: 914: 898: 875:for deletion. 855:will stop the 799: 790: 774: 739: 737: 732:Nomination of 730: 684: 680: 675: 652: 644: 643: 642: 626: 625: 593: 588: 587: 586: 557: 550: 538: 534: 531: 471: 468: 467: 466: 465: 464: 463: 462: 461: 460: 422: 366: 363: 342: 339: 322: 317: 297: 294: 293: 292: 291: 290: 272: 271: 237: 232: 231: 230: 210: 209: 152: 147: 146: 145: 144: 143: 129: 128: 93: 88: 87: 86: 55:this reversion 50: 47: 37: 36: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 945: 934: 931: 929: 926: 925: 923: 911: 910: 903: 900: 897: 896: 892: 888: 882: 876: 874: 870: 866: 862: 858: 847: 845: 841: 830: 828: 822: 818: 816: 812: 798: 794: 791: 789: 788: 782: 778: 770: 767: 762: 760: 756: 752: 751: 735: 731: 729: 728: 724: 720: 716: 712: 708: 704: 700: 696: 692: 688: 679: 676: 674: 673: 670: 669: 667:It Is Me Here 662: 658: 651: 648: 645: 641: 637: 633: 628: 627: 623: 620: 616: 615: 614: 613: 608: 604: 599: 592: 589: 585: 581: 577: 572: 571: 570: 569: 565: 561: 555: 549: 547: 543: 532: 530: 529: 525: 521: 518:. Thank you. 517: 513: 509: 505: 500: 498: 494: 490: 486: 485: 469: 459: 455: 451: 447: 446: 445: 441: 437: 433: 430: 427: 423: 419: 418: 417: 413: 409: 404: 403: 402: 398: 394: 390: 385: 384: 383: 380: 376: 372: 364: 362: 361: 357: 353: 347: 340: 338: 337: 333: 329: 321: 318: 316: 315: 311: 307: 303: 295: 289: 285: 281: 276: 275: 274: 273: 270: 266: 262: 258: 254: 253: 252: 251: 247: 243: 236: 233: 229: 225: 221: 216: 212: 211: 207: 206: 205: 204: 200: 196: 191: 189: 184: 182: 178: 174: 170: 165: 163: 159: 151: 148: 142: 139: 133: 132: 131: 130: 127: 123: 119: 115: 114: 113: 112: 109: 103: 99: 92: 89: 85: 81: 77: 72: 71: 70: 69: 66: 65: 60: 56: 49:Intresting IP 48: 46: 44: 34: 30: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 907: 902: 881:page history 877: 859:, but other 848: 840:edit summary 831: 824: 820: 808: 771: 763: 748: 746: 736:for deletion 682: 664: 654: 595: 591:Nadav Safran 553: 539: 536: 501: 482: 480: 368: 348: 344: 324: 320:Frantz Fanon 306:Jaque Hammer 300:Please see: 299: 239: 192: 185: 166: 154: 95: 63: 52: 40: 32: 26: 556:the attack. 546:Henry Field 328:Vol de nuit 175:instead of 137:Redtigerxyz 107:Redtigerxyz 64:Stor stark7 922:Categories 887:FastilyBot 703:topic bans 280:Shoplifter 242:Shoplifter 873:consensus 813:has been 809:The file 699:site bans 560:BesterRus 558:Regards, 520:J Milburn 195:Richard S 91:Mandodari 59:this edit 885:Thanks, 663:. Best, 489:fair use 450:Martinlc 408:Martinlc 371:Martinlc 98:Kabandha 777:ZXCVBNM 759:deleted 603:RolandR 544:orders 842:or on 689:. The 554:before 100:? See 632:DBaba 576:DBaba 436:DBaba 393:DBaba 352:DBaba 261:DBaba 220:DBaba 118:DBaba 76:DBaba 891:talk 781:TALK 723:talk 636:talk 607:talk 580:talk 564:talk 524:talk 454:talk 440:talk 412:talk 397:talk 389:this 375:talk 356:talk 332:talk 310:talk 284:talk 265:talk 246:talk 224:talk 199:talk 122:talk 80:talk 795:of 683:Hi, 650:GAR 434:) 924:: 893:) 846:. 829:. 761:. 725:) 701:, 638:) 582:) 566:) 526:) 499:. 456:) 442:) 414:) 399:) 377:) 369:-- 358:) 334:) 312:) 304:. 286:) 267:) 248:) 226:) 201:) 193:-- 164:. 124:) 82:) 889:( 783:) 779:( 721:( 634:( 609:) 605:( 578:( 562:( 522:( 452:( 438:( 410:( 395:( 373:( 354:( 330:( 308:( 282:( 263:( 244:( 222:( 197:( 120:( 78:(

Index


This user may have left Knowledge (XXG)

this reversion
this edit
Stor stark7
09:37, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
DBaba
talk
19:37, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Mandodari
Kabandha
Talk:Mandodari/GA1
Redtigerxyz
16:43, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
DBaba
talk
16:58, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
Redtigerxyz
16:04, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
Contest to kill 100 people using a sword
Nanking Massacre
Nanking Massacre
Historiography of the Nanking Massacre
Historiography of the Nanking Massacre
Nanking Massacre
Nanking Massacre
Historiography of the Nanking Massacre
Richard S
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑