User talk:DGG/Archive 20 Sept. 2008

3778:, publisher=Utah Missions, Inc, Salt Lake City, Utah.(for the group, www.godtube.com/watchman.) I assume the journal is consituted of material from its site? I see another journal said to be their publication, tThe Watchman Expositor.) There is a general consideration: sources are never totally reliable or totally unreliable--it is a continuum, and the use of a particular item depends on its nature and the purpose used. There is a particularly high standard for sources for negative or controversial material about a living individual, where in general no informally published website can be used except one by himself or his organisation and that only for routine bio or his own views. Negative or controversial material about other subjects also has to be sourced carefully--when taken from biased sources, they must be used in a fair and not misleading manner, , and balanced with opposing views. In addition, opinions from there--or anywhere--must be carefully attributed as the views of the author, unless the official position of the group. There are a few special cases. First, one can write a source about a controversial publisher or website that is itself notable. such articles have tended to be very difficult to keep to a NPOV, but they can be done. If the magazine or the website is possibly notable, I suggest doing that--I usually do ,for I think it gives a way or people to evaluate the quality of quotations from them. But this has to be prevented from becoming a place to attack (or defend) whatever it is that this group attacks. Second, sometimes a particular controversial work or even posting, no matter how wrong and prejudicial, becomes itself an item of general interest and independent notability, and needs to be written about. The classic example is Mein Kampf, and, obviously such articles have to be handled very carefully indeed, and with a full treatment of opposing views. They are always difficult to write, and keep to a NPOV, and take continual looking after to see they do not drift into a discussion of whatever it is that is being attacked. 2540:

or significant general films, but any published--not web--material will do. then, find some discussions of this concept in real life, from some published magazine or book that is generally available, print or online. Do not rely on web sites. I know the printed literature is limited & difficult to find, but you are better situated than I to identify it. The term is extremely hard to search for on google because of other uses--I did not succeed, even with combination of other words -- e.g., quad and sexuality yielded discussions of disability. Try to write it all up in a manner that looks like an encyclopedia article--not how you;d talk to friends, but how you'd write it, for people who were not particular understanding, & thought it perhaps a little too eccentric to have a place in an encyclopedia--try to discuss it as not limited exclusively to the contemporary polyamory scene. There is a major problem with alternative sexuality articles here--one needs to explain the general significance. Then, expand the article on triads similarly--it could use it. There's certainly enough classic literature. And don't try in the article to

3619:

intrusive, and there does not seem to be any simply way of sophisticating wikmarkup sufficiently to it better, given our need to be compatible with primitive browsers. Hypertext needs to be done in a careful and painstaking and unobtrusive way, and html for all its wonderful flexibility and accessibility is not capable of what is needed. I would very strongly support reworking the entire encyclopedia in XML of sufficient flexibility to provide linking for this and much else, and the ability to solve the otherwise insoluble problem of what is best put in separate articles. Short of that, i see no solution, and would not be surprised to see the entire matter reversed once a year. When I started I saw a number of things like that to which I could devote my entire attention, but soon realised I would have to specialize--and withdraw from MOS discussions very fast, just as I did from categorization. Not that they are either of them unimportant, but no one person can work on everything at once. well, maybe some people can, but I'm not included in the pantheon.

3736:

unnecessary. All that is needed is to quote some of his statements. There's no need to go out of the way to find material to discredit him. I'm going to be doing some further cuts there. I do not think the details of his agricultural schemes are of any significance, for example. BLP is not just a matter of avoiding poor quality sources, but of innuendo. I'm a great believer in moderation being the best way to deal with articles on people like this. As for the college, BLP applies to biographical material regardless of what sort of article it appears in. Discuss the college in terms of what it does and what its curriculum is, not in terms of who is running it. As for the source, the thing to to is a/see if it is prominent enough to write an article about it. and then b/ask about it at the RS noticeboard. BTW, I'd like an exact source for his reading list. I think you gave only a selected part, and that may also be unfair selection.

2045:

non-experts need. As a reader, i think the articles on logical fallacies tend to cover too many things too quickly. the article on Argument from ignorance, for example,covers what non-philosophers may think are three different things. The argument from personal disbelief is a much cruder thing, and also really needs separate treatment. Alas, I do not have the time now to do what I really want to, which is to build up the argument about the distinctions from sources. Incidentally, the example I used is the one I taught Princeton's committee on the ethical uses of animals to use for the proof of no previous work that the federal standard demands, and they accepted it. True, I don't think there were any philosophy people there at the time.:).

523:. I plan on possibly removing two paragraphs on his literary criticism and adding two summary paragraphs (one for each of the above). However, what I would like from you is to provide any off hand knowledge, requests for topics, etc, on the talk pages. In particularly, I will describe Johnson's moral views on slavery on the morality page, and his political views on Scotland, colonialism/the colonies, and the politics of slavery on the politics page. Most of his works criss cross between, but I think I can follow David Greene's model to split them apart. It should allow me to give rough summaries of his writings followed by a moral detailed analysis of some key topics. It is really starting to look like Johnson needs a WikiProject. 2650:

necessary to establish the authority of the translator--it is obviously not a literal translation, e.g. "nosey parkers " Perhaps you could also add a short quotation from Aristotle that will serve as a definition of what he meant by the term. But what is also needed is a discussion saying what the difference is between this concept and the analogous terms. As just an amateur reader, it seems to be Epicetus is talking about the mental facility of intelligence, not of moral judgment--at least in the first selection. I am aware the entire school of philosophy thought them very similar, but it still needs a discussion.

4001:

about the subject matter, but even I can see some of the grounds given for these tags are both wrong and defying consensus (what is the difference between 712 words and 700 that requires a tag? Why not just delete 12 words?). None of it seems constructive, it seems inherently negative, and my guess is that this is similar to some of the dragonball tagging (which I've been fighting where I notice), namely an attempt to build a paper trail to let him nuke the article quickly later via either a merge or AfD (and/or a dislike of the subject matter). Can someone please talk to this editor?

558:

follow Greene's pattern in separating (yet uniting) the two. His work on the Yale editions and helping to divide the sections is particularly worth while. I might also make a page devoted to his literary career, i.e. a brief assessment of how his styles and works developed (journalism, poetry, biography) without talking about the themes per se. This would allow for a discussion on his editing techniques. Thats far down the road and not a current concern, however.

3806:

that after reading the original puff article, I started looking into him, and the more I looked the more I found, so I was just constantly dumping more material in. The article absolutely needed a second and third set of eyes. Obviously his history is problematic, but you're right, it's probably best to let the facts speak for themselves. I concede that, when trying to balance out the puff article, I swung the pendulum too far the other way. --

1999:

blatant advertising and the references provided are not impartial. It is also questionable whether Charles Linden as an article is noteworthy enough to merit an encyclopaedic entry anyway. My main objection is that the page is being maintained by one person only, namely user:CLinden, who has identified himself as Charles Linden himself. I would appreciate your advice and intervention in this matter. Please reply on my talk page. Thankyou.

105:

the aforementioned emails. Nor do I have any intention of logging back in in the immediate future, barring I am indeed again notified of something significant via email, although to be honest, I am seriously considering closing my yahoo email as well I really do need to focus on my non-wiki life and to do all I can to encourage certain individuals to leave me alone. Thank you for your time and consideration. --

100:(let's just say some really are fanatics and take things too far) in that my current userspace has made it too easy to identify me. Moreover, I only edited yesterday after a brief email exchange with Lankiveil regarding his RfA and now today after being notified that my talk page may be unprotected. I am trying to decide if I should request both talk and user be deleted and hold off from continuing on 2211: 946: 1226: 1187: 541:

Kings James health in the wine King George gives me the money to pay for." Any major writer is worth a complex of articles (the alternative, a very long one in the old EB style, is less effective on the web, though in principle equally justifiable. I look forward to a WP 2.0 where the text is in a granular database and these things can be adjusted to suit.

2178:

Additionally, I have refrained from the temptation to respond with an identical rationale to his identical rationales, and have reworked each one specifically for the particular situation. I havent even given the same !vote -- some keep, some merge, some redirect. One even delete. They are not ad hominem. I consider what he is

252: 3856:

See WP:MERGE -- what you do is to now place an explanation of what your intent is on the talk page of the article you intend to merge to. also list it at WP:RM. You will first have to get consensus, combine the text, and then change to a redirect. Myself, I am not at all sure that an article for the

3805:

No, I'm not necessarily eager to re-include the material; I was just curious about the applicability of the reliable source principles to that LDS article, so I was just speaking theoretically about an anti-TJEd article. I don't plan on pursuing that. I think what happened with the DeMille article is

2712:

Howdy! Thanks for pointing out the changes in CSD, there's a lot more categories in that than I remember. Good thing, too, the new categories are ones that were "gray areas" before. BLP, uh... baroque is a good word for it. Holy crap. Definitely glad I just handle the mop. Incidentally, since I'm

540:

Good approach. But I would suggestmoral writings or moral views, or even better ethical views. The phase SJ's morality has an unfortunate implication. I think the key in both is his writings, not his political views to the extent there was a difference, despite his ironic. "Of course I can not drink

3238:

DGG: In response to your suggestion that there should be a considerable reduction of the section "1998 Edition of 'The Assault on Truth'" on the Jeffrey Moussaieff Masson page, I have proposed the whole section be removed. See my reasons at the Jeffrey Moussaieff Masson discussion page at the bottom

2809:

is headed to deletion. I support its deletion myself. But this has given me an idea. Do you think it would make sense to have a set of categories called "Age x deaths," all in a parent category called "Deaths by age?" That seems like a better idea. This way, there would be no worry where to draw the

2571:

Why would you Delete, "Global delivery system". That is something that is almost only known to the airlines. and is a big part of how the US transfers large information. How about you delete TCP/IP also I guess that is not needed. By deleting this information you have shown me how Knowledge (XXG) is

2539:

what you need to do is what I said on your user page: find material for the article and add it--such is much better than argument. Find some fictional works with such relationships, and add a discussion of them as examples (shouldn't be difficult) Preferably, they should works of general literature,

2383:

Right, not in the sense used in this article, which seems to be imaginary. But the term is used in the exact sense of a person or approach that accepts the viewpoint of cardinalism, in the GScholar refs above. See nos. 2, 6, & 7. But, agreed 101%, that would never justify a WP article, or even

2177:

You are probably right that it's overkill, and that I have called sufficient attention to it, and could advantageously use less detail. (My reason for repeating something on every article is that in the past, those articles on which people have not bothered to add keep comments have gotten deleted).

1749:

I think this would be an excellent way of doing things, to limit the damage from the abuse and simultaneously limit the damage the program might cause. I suggest the block say explicitly that it is an interim measure. (please copy your Q and my A as appropriate) Very clever, and I wish I had thought

584:

seems to have a specific technical meaning which does not apply to SJ. I don't see the distinction your making between having ethical views and being a moralist. I seem to recall the term JB usually uses of him in this context is "moralist" Come to think of it, let me check his dictionary. 21:37,

99:

Dear DGG, in addition to my work, basset hound, and school related concerns, I am looking into some kind of change of username maybe even right to vanish regarding my current username and userspace related in part to some off-wiki, but still wiki-related concerns that I would rather not go into here

3971:

I know I never speedy or finish a prod without checking for sources unless its patently obvious that none are possible or the matter is irrelevant. This is a cooperative project, and what the original editors don't do the rest of us should help. I was hoping your field expertise could assure me of

3583:

I don't really see how telling people what's happening will avoid the discussion (it will probably increase it if anything). But I've nothing against telling people what's happening; I just don't think it should be done on a guideline page, which is supposed to provide stable guidance on writing WP

3564:

If the date style guide is not the place to let the average Knowledge (XXG) editor know what is happening with delinked dates, would you please explain where that place is? Isn't it important to let people know what is happening and try to avoid all of the continued discussion that is taking place?

3216:

And I may be wrong here. We'll see. It just needed to be settled with discussion rather than PROD or another speedy. FWIW, I think you're right -- it's not speedy-eligible since it's not blatant spam and didn't match the most recently deleted version. I hope this AfD is allowed to run its course so

3157:

Just an FYI, EliteAnswers.com article has beed deleted in the past through a AfD... I can't see the old page, so not sure about how much is different, plus look at the talk page for the article's creator. I'm not the only one for a speedy on it. But, JM2C. BTW, thanks for being an admin on WP.

2831:

Yes, and it could be populated automagically. But the place to ask it is at the village Pump. If we had a proper database, or an really good search engine, a user could do this now as desired, but the possibility of working this way in the future -- permitting a wide variety of intersections that

2596:

It was deleted because there was no information provided in the article to indicate why this web provider of project management software was in any way important. If you can show it is notable, with the use of 3rd party independent reliable published sources, print or online (but not blogs or press

2466:

I can't comment on the situation in other countries, but in Australia, no government approval is needed for individual degrees. Now, you need government approval to issue degrees (e.g. Bachelor, Master, Doctorate, etc.). But, once you are authorized to issue degrees, you can issue as many different

2155:

I'm not trying to oppose your takes on things or ride you or like that; we have certainly both agreed on some articles from time to time. I also certainly agree that he is a tad heavy on bringing articles to AfD without exercising other options, but there are other venues for that — AfD, I believe,

2110:

Back in 2005 and earlier, it was fairly common to see editors misunderstand what the reference section is for and add stuff that now we all know should be under external links of further reading there. Inline cites helped a lot; before I - just like many, many others - used to lump everything under

1998:

Hi. I recently wrote about a conflict of interest with the above article, and as asked I placed proposed deletion tag on the article. The tag has now been removed. I do not know how to justify the tag properly, as the page is in such a mess it really does merit speedy deletion. It is being used for

1883:

I am not a very social person, but i do appreciate the time you took to try to convince me to maintain a more polite front at the page that defaults as my user page when i forget to log in, or get timed out, or whatever. I think i'm logged in now, but i can't really see the screen or read it up at

1657:

I see you've already reverted me and we're editing past each other, so sorry about that. A quick review didn't lead me to think this book was notable, hence I placed the prod. No problem with the tags remaining and hopefully someone who wont have to do as much research as me will notice and fill it

3785:

As for the LDS article you mention, such an article is one that must inherently discuss groups such as this and present their views. So it can be a special case. We'd have to look at how it is being used or proposed to be used. I suggest you discuss it there with the other people interested in the

3404:

you need to be able to show that the word is in fact an aryan loan word, and give enough information to sow the meaning in the original language(s0 and in Tamil. This is the english Knowledge (XXG), and though we certainly cover topics like this, you must explain the subject to English readers who

1731:

How would you feel about letting the filter trigger a short block (15 minutes or so), and fire off an IRC or a report to a log page? That way, false triggers have minimal effect, and an admin has to decide to extend the block. It does keep the kind of serial vandalism sprees we see from being very

1635:

I think your edit here conflicted with my adding of a prod, but no warning was given. The speedy had already been declined (I interpreted "context" in a different way, I fully accept the refusal). I therefore restored my prod. However, if you intended to remove the prod please let me know and I'll

1571:

The first person to start the article is mentioned in the next newsletter. This month's article is Leslie Ann Moore's first book in her fantasy 'Griffin's Daughter' trilogy, which was named by the Independent Book Publishers Association as the 2008 Ben Franklin Award winner for Best First Fiction,

1482:

With the Newsletter being almost three months overdue, I have decided to take on the position of Editor to make sure it reaches you regularly on time each month. The Newsletter is meant to inspire and encourage our team of Editors and so my goal shall be to make it informative and interesting each

557:

Would "moralism" work? Or "moralisms"? I want to make the term broad enough to include quotes that might not have been in Johnson's writings. I also want to capture the feeling of him being a "moralist", so ethical views might obscure this. Feel free to move accordingly. Also, I'm going to try and

104:

altogether in that too much outside stuff needs focus, or if I should just change my username and "start over." If you wish to discuss with me by email, that is fine, as I am not really looking at my talk page at present and had no intention of logging back on yesterday or today if it weren't for

4000:

I am not an admin and don't much have the patience to take this through whatever disputes/arbitration process is recommended in such situations, but I'm getting a bit sick of this sort of tactic. It seems to be bullying and it's a pattern. S/he also ignores consensus (again). I don't know much

2649:

I think it's way excessive. You're the expert, try to reduce them to a key sentence or two each. You want to explain what it is, not copy his entire rhetorical argument. I'm not in fact sure that 1b is even necessary. Do you know where is the translation from--is it published? if not, it will be

2488:

more exactly, a graduate program usually requires such. At least in NY State it does. Whether it can alter the names around I frankly do not know--interesting point--thanks for reminding me of it. But I agree with you about the uselessness of articles on names used for single programs unless the

3735:

May I make a suggestion. I actually fully share your view on the man and the college. A straightforward presentation without any special emphasis of the inconsistent parts is quite sufficient to show it to anyone except his supporters. What you are doing is overkill. Besides being unfair, it is

3618:

wp has unfortunately no way of making stable decisions about anything. In this case there is a bit of a of a dilemma--although the theoretical advantages of linking dates was very real, any serious application of the possibilities was for future implementation. meanwhile, it looks terrible and

200:

has been deleted, as a test page, but it really did not meet any of the conventional criterial exactly--what we may need is a criterion for fiction, etc. that is worded to delete stuff like this, but not things that should be transwikified, such as poems by established authors out of copyright.

3781:

I am aware of the nature of the overall group. According to itself, it is "is one of the largest Evangelical Christian ministries engaging cults, the occult and new religios movements" This appears to includes, among other things the LDS, the JWs, Christian Science, etc. and other non-standard

3501:

alas, among the dozens or hundreds of things here I do not know how to do is this--I have never actually learned how to do complex history merges. I've tried, and others have unfortunately had to clean them up. I can do a plain restore to mainspace per the consensus that the chart position is

2021:

You claimed in the AfD that the term "Negative proof" is commonly used in scientific literature and you provided a link to a Google Scholar search as evidence. I didn't find a single citation where "negative proof" was used to mean "Conclude X from the lack of evidence for ~X." Instead, the

801:

Im not good at this sort of syntax. Just give the link somewhere and someone will fix it up. But first consider whether you are indeed likely to get the article deleted. It would appear to me that the latest NYT article on him, in connection with the previous articles, makes a good case for

2044:

Responded there and want to explain further here: As you can tell, Im not trained in philosophy, just in science, and in practice we use terms rather informally in most subjects. I apologize for what I recognize as my unprofessional view, but the common usage in other fields counts, and what

693:

I am not confident about the importance and reliable nature of the sources used for the software reviews there; the reviews appear relatively superficial. As I don't use Windows if I can help it, and think BBEdit and pico the optimum editors for the platforms I do use, I haven't followed

2631:

I just discovered that this article exists. It is an important subject in Stoic philosophy, and I have made a small addition. The article makes a massive use of quotes, but I think that in this case that may be justified, and I would be interested in knowing your view on that. Thanks.

2025:

If you actually saw relevant citations in the search results, please return to the AfD and point me in the right direction. As it is, I can't say that I've ever seen the term used thus aside from on Knowledge (XXG), a personal website and a few places that cite one or both of those.

1956:

Previously you voted to delete this article. It survived and is now being voted on a second time. I noticed you when someone else mentioned your name on the 2nd AfD. There were a couple of edit wars in the interim. If you have the time, please give your view on the subject at the

2295:

no reason not to use the template to notify me--I do not consider such templating an insult, but rather a convenience. I will look for sources. As an alternative, you could have asked me to give it a try, but this is OK also. To start me off, have you searched beyond the Googles?

2354:

The word there stems from the word "cardinal" versus "ordinal". It refers to whether or not we can think of "utility" (or satisfaction derived from something) as a value with a number attached to it (cardinal) or whether it only makes sense as a ranking (ordinal). That

3643:

Thank you for adding the citations to the article on the sociologist Rhys Williams. It was good of you to express desires to keep this article. I take your point about notability of academics - I would say that I was actually more concerned that my recent articles on

3001:

and his self-declared mission on Knowledge (XXG). I have blocked the user to prevent further disruption and abuse, based in no small part on his own words in the deleetd revisions of his user page, and I'd like to invite you in particular to oversee any discussion on

588:

I moved it to ethical views. Someone can move it to something different later. I wanted to note that I trimmed the critical section and put in more information on his moral views and political views in the character sketch section and then put main links at the top.

2810:

line as to what age is "significant" as an age of death, and all ages people live to can possibly be included. There would be no need for one person to create all these categories in one day - they could be built gradually over time. We already have categories like

1829:

Not sure what you mean by 'indexed.' If MiszaBot is used, it will automatically increment archive numbers as they fill up according to a scheme like Archive_19, Archive_20 etc. but I don't think it can do 'Archive_19_Aug._2008' like the system you currently use.

3838:

with the merger procedures. I guess what I wish I had done is simply do a redirect and left the contents of the referring article as a comment in the main article's talk page . . . is that an appropriate course of action or is that considered antisocial?

802:

notability. One event does not apply when the event is sufficiently important, & if the NYT refers to him as notable, he probably is by even our standards. I hope I am not influenced excessively by the fact that I think his actions utterly appalling.

3692:

Well, I have just looked at the discussion on "Rhys Williams" and saw that the result was "keep" - a big, big thank you indeed, as you were the one who got the ball rolling there. I see that on your user-page, you come down on the side of the inclus

2791: 3518:

I'll go search for someone that has handled a cut-and-paste rename. Because the article was redirected, not deleted, the original histories still exist. Multiple editors worked on the sandbox version, so there's a separate history that needs

2864:

I had a hard time finding it there too, & might not have been able without knowing who it was about. Google does not do very well for words used in multiple senses. One of the reasons the world needs a comprehensive web encyclopedia.

2597:

releases), then by all means create the article again. But unless you can provide some explanation of its significance, and back that up with some independent sources, it will undoubtedly be deleted again--see WP:CORP for the standard,

2454: 3949:

does not establish the notability. If an article does not do that, it is in danger of being deleted in my experience. The burden of proof normally rests with the article and editors who wish to keep it! Compare this article to

2182:

disruptive, and I am talking about that, not him. I have said nothing about motivation except repeating what he has said himself. I am willing to work with him or anyone in effecting merges and other improvements in these

133:

I have restored my talk page for the time being, although I strongly urge anyone to just email while I look into what would be the best idea to proceed, i.e. should I do a right to vanish, username change, etc. I see that

2489:

programs are particularly significant. But they should be included somewhere or other with a redirect, for people who look them up will not know in advance that they're trivial. And such was Protonk's sensible closing.

3484:, everyone that argued for redirect has said the article can be restored. Can you do the honors of moving the article and talk page and merging the histories? Or can you point me at the right place to make the request? 783:

Sorry, didn't realize it was overturned at DRV. I've been trying to find the right template to show this on the talk page. Do you happen to know which template to use? It has to be similar to the AFD history template.

2152:; maybe ArbCom (you probably know there was already a second look at his conduct, in which they decided no action needed to be taken) will take a third look at his conduct or change Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on AfDs. 3716:

Never mind, I think I understand your position, though I do not agree with it. Any blocking would certainly be appealed. Separately, it's not a BLP issue, but could you weigh in on the use of this type of source at

2521:

by making this one. Heck I wasn't even finished with it when I came back to it and found somebody had marked it for deletion. Please sir, as an administrator is there anything you all can do to better police this

1812:

Can you do it retrospectively, so previous archives are also indexed? Otherwise i will have to do a cut off point. Yes, I am beginning to see the need to move some of the things I've ben doing to formal essays.

3721:? If it is acceptable there, is it possible I could use this type of source at a "criticism of George Wythe College"-type article? If it's not acceptable there, could you weigh in at that article's talk page? -- 1958: 1909: 2461:

typically they need approval from whatever is the government or accrediting body having jurisdiction. We need some listing for things that people are likely to look up, not just the ones they already know

3111:

Not sure if you watch my talk so I've copied the message. Thanks for the heads up. I'm not sure about postal museum. Fire museum can be fixed, I think. I just left a note on the talk and I'll work on it.

3954:, which has information about its age and relative size. This article was not tagged by me, since it had this additional information. I hope these two examples show you what I was looking for. Regards, 2894: 1884:

the top, just the keyboard and the portion of the screen directly in front of me (the little window box), so, anyway, i'll put a nicer message there, Thanks for your kindness. cat yronwode a.k.a. "64"

3543:

As I'm sure you are aware, there has been a significant change in the past month of how dates are handled on Knowledge (XXG). In particular, automformatting of dates is now deprecated as described on

3173:

David, courtesy heads up. I've AfDed this. Its history is ridiculous and I really think the new capitalisation is an effort to evade detection without any real notability established. Afd is here:

496:

I am curious, what has been done in previous cases when a BLP article subject simply does not want certain information, or any information, available about himself or herself on Knowledge (XXG)?

1215: 2312:

Yes I've checked for an equivalent on fr wiki, also French reference books. It's not in Britannica. I think it's basically really a dictionary entry, and a not-very-common expression at that.

3424:

While I was one (of many, apparently) who was canvassed, I see that you are involved in the discussion. (Though I haven't looked at anything but the talk pages which the editor canvassed.)

3551:

is delinking dates in thousands of articles. This hasn't been well-published, many editiors are not aware of it, and some wonder what is going on. I would be interested in your opinion of

3379:. There are a few people who seem to be intent in damaging the article by adding "cite" tags, "disputed" and "dubious" tags for the article and threatening to delete it within 24 hours. 1443: 880:

that there were a few problems with the nomination. I've responded to your concerns and I hope I've addressed them appropriately. Sorry if my nom seemed like a clear-cut case of using an

847:

Hey DGG, just going about my Prod perusals I noticed this comment of yours on the above talk page. You didn't actually remove the Prod from the article, just letting you know that's all.

3476:, and once he passed the basics of actually having sources for his statements, etc. I put notices on the talk pages of everyone that had voted for redirect. As you can see by comparing 3059:

seems to be a deletion request from the 2 authors, which, stretching things a little, is a speedy g7. I so marked it, to see if another admit would concurr and delete it. If not, AfD.

3782:

religious movements. It would seem obvious that nothing it publishes can be seen as objective unless confirmed by objective sources, any more than any of the advocacy groups elsewhere.

2071: 3945:, it contains no encyclopedic information whatsoever except the location of the winery. So I added a comment and temple in this case. I did not check any sources - I pointed out that 1486:

We now have many positions vacant in our Project Team, so we are looking for members who have the time and interest to take on the various roles, details of which can be found at the

1269: 33:[[Image: Hello. I notice that you protected that page for a month. Could you please unprotect it? As far as I know, user talk pages may only be protected if the user is blocked; see 317:) and so I inferred that it was a coi/spam thing. You're right though that a rewrite is probably better than deletion, and I'll attempt that next time a similar situation comes up. 1597: 1273: 1155:

The previous content was : An anonymous class is an inner class which is initialized and used on the fly. Example: dispatcher.forward(new HttpServletRequestWrapper(request) { } );

2338:, so there's no point keeping this particular article--though a new one is needed on the real topic. I should have checked earlier, but I assumed you had checked the googles. 2839: 2384:

a redirect. I don't know the Wiktionary policy for such derivative forms. OED would not usually make a separate lemma for such use, but add it to the main word, cardinalism.

1289: 2674:

It looks like it will be necessary to remove all the quotes now in the article. I will do that when I can organize a rewrite to replace it. Thanks for looking, and replying.

3174: 3565:

See, for example, this comment "But the style guide does not anywhere call for mass delinking of dates. The bot is making disruptive edits that are not consensus." left on

3327: 1349: 959:, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active within the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:Novels editor, please add your name back to the 877: 1456:

aims to help editors with the coordination of articles within the thousands of media franchises which exist and has requested input from our members. They are currently

2111:

references, whether we used it or not... it's nice to see how our standards of quality improved. If only that improvement would involve civility and good faith... :( --

3789:

You appear very eager to includes this material somewhere, and i therefore wonder if you are have such a strong POV on the topic to make objective editing difficult.

2471:

different degree names used by Australian universities, and the list is never going to stop growing, so it seems silly to create a Knowledge (XXG) article for each. --

2333: 2846:

Thanks for the reminder. I read about that cartoon in high school, but completely forgot all the details, and Google surprisingly enough didn't help me at all. ^_^

2094:

well, all students learn that it's asking for trouble to add refs relying only on listings on the web but without seeing them. But I'm not perfect here myself. :)

3085:

I declined the speedy on that, reviewing your notes on the talk. I've commented there as well. I've also watchlisted it in case we have any issues brewing! Cheers!

3427:

As I (as usual) am distracted by innumerable discussions and tasks (and RL) atm, you'll please pardon me if I was happy to read that you're apparently helping : )

2070:

One of the good example showing how this project is failing is that instead of trying to find out the truth about the book (as you've tried), involved editors are

2225:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge (XXG)'s 2275:

Sorry to template you - just working through French orphaned articles. This came from Nuttalls, but a quick check didn't find much other reference. Kind Regards

1457: 387: 1539: 1524: 258: 150:. So, maybe something like this would be the way to proceed as my current username and userspace has made it too easy for unwanted off-wiki consequences. -- 1074:

Hello David, some time ago (actually, exactly one year ago, as I now see :-)) you helped me out by sending me an article we've then used for the article on

984: 2363:, a mathematical term describing the size of sets. I don't know of any connection between "cardinalism" and "cardinality". I don't suspect there is one. 493:, I thought I'd point you to the latest on the issue, with a post by a person claiming to the be the article subject threatening deletion of the article. 3753: 3718: 1460:

for franchise articles. Since this may affect one or more articles in our Novel project, they would like to get opinions before implimenting any changes.

3192:

perfectly reasonable way to go. I've been wrong before :). And now I know where to make the argument--after i've re-examined the article, of course.

1345: 2256:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

3477: 2261: 1488: 1453: 973: 3131: 3124: 416:. As you could have seen from the talk page that you deleted, the author was a new editor who has not understood how categories work and has copied 1219: 1211: 68:

Although he's substantially cut back of late, LGRdC seems not to have departed -- is edit-protecting his talk page appropriate and/or necessary? --

1446:

has a series of discussions about whether to categorize certain specific types of fictional characters: double agents, dictators, characters with

83:

I think you are right--it has served the purpose of preventing a few days unnecessary conflict. I'll remove it now,giving him a few hours warning.

1323: 1311: 960: 956: 1492:. Shortly a Coordinator nominations notice shall also be sent out to all members, which will commence the annual Coordinator selection process. 27: 2726: 4040:

Of course I was aware that BLP does not apply to the dead, hence it's title of Biography if Living Persons. What I was referring to was that

3481: 2832:

could be defined ad hoc--is as I understand it part of the reason why we code for Year XX births and deaths. 23:21, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

37:. Otherwise, I believe the talk page should remain open for communication with the user, and for any warnings that may be required. Thanks, 3584:

articles. Such "news" can be announced at the community portal, village pump, centralized discussions, relevant project pages, and so on.--

2972: 2906: 2605:. Alternative, if you mean to discuss such systems in general, write the article so it makes it clear. It will still need sources a above. 2230: 342:, our FAQ for COI-influenced articles like this, prepared by Durova. I frequently send that link to editors like that to give them advice 3673:

Now, quickly, gofixthem--Holm first, Sunden will stand. -- I've suggested to you what's needed, but I cant write all the articles myself.

2022:

majority of citations were coincidence (theorems with the last word "negative" followed by the word "Proof") and other irrelevant uses.

723: 1001: 678: 2226: 1161:

I am not sure there is appreciably more content present, though at least there are links. --some context is needed for the non-expert.

4054: 3441: 3010:

a set of conditions can be agreed which restrict the inappropriate use of Knowledge (XXG) by this user to further an external agenda.

2579: 1092:

All right, it's already done. Sorry for the noise. It's a death notice; the painter died on August 3, 1933. Exactly what I suspected.

2265: 1277: 3472:

asked me for help restoring an article that I had taken to AFD. I told him if he wrote a good article, I'd help. So, he wrote it at

987:

selection process. We hope to have more involvement and input this time around! More news will be forthcoming. Thanks, everyone!

153: 108: 2927:

if I were to share those views on this sort of article, I would be very content to have achieved the present 80% success rate. :)

3217:

we can get consensus. The creator is trying his best, I just am not sure he has enough material from which to work. PS: Stay dry!

2806: 2144:

attacks on him on every AfD he does. It doesn't make you look any better than him, and it also makes you as viable as engaging in

1050:

extremely intresting. this one is only borderline, but I think Hrafn is pressing things on this general topic area much too hard.

3473: 1667: 1645: 2905:. Unfortunately, the nominator is not content with this consensus and is now proposing that the article be merged. Please see 4082: 3933:. I added them in May after a large number of articles on Moldovan wineries were added in a short time, most or all of them by 1929:

thanks, i repeated my view that it was a keep, though this time the discussion was more helpful, and I said it was a weak one.

1296: 789: 287: 1583:

Note: This article was previously deleted due to lack of notability, but that now can be established since winning this award.

1476: 1327: 1234: 1194: 966: 896: 417: 367: 326: 3353: 2218: 1409:

movies and even battled addiction to alcohol and cigars. The book is not published until October 1, but judges for the 2008

1079: 1078:. I wonder if you could help me a second time? I'm looking for a 98-word snippet from the New York Times of August 5, 1933 3445: 3376: 3364: 3357: 2966: 637: 632: 3430:

That said, if at some point you do feel that another set of eyes would be helpful, please feel free to drop me a note. -

3163: 1405:

as the oldest recorded non-human primate at the age of 76. He has appeared in various movie roles which included twelve

1022: 641: 2234: 3375:. I am citing a standard authoritative lexicon from which I find the words that are borrowed before including them at 3138:, due to the rain predicted for this weekend.. I hope you can make it to the new time, and bring a friend (or two)!-- 1889: 1659: 1637: 3996:

I have noticed that Collectonian has been bullying and deying consensus in relation to this article, see talk page:

1379:

fastest selling hardcover fiction title. It is the latest installment in the book series about British secret agent

520: 516: 3701:

Can you please provide a specific example of what you are accusing me of so I know where to steer clear? Thanks. --

3502:

sufficient for a separate article, but perhaps someone will come along here and offer to do the whole thing right.

2336: 785: 624: 229:, so I assumed the discussion period was over. Maybe there's something wrong with the bot that updates the list. -- 2186:

And I thank you for letting me know the bad effect I am apparently having. It's good to have outside critiques.

1784:

Second. I cried when I tried to load the page on dial up. I was short in my email because of it. Pllleeeasseeee.

1774:

This page is 455 kilobytes long. Have you considered archiving for your fellow editors' comfort and ease of use?

1410: 2428:

one of the side benefits of the mop is the ability to see the article for "a brand new video sharing site " :)

3786:

topic. And, if necessary, bring it to the Reliable Sources noticeboard for a broader view than just you and me.

2914: 2679: 2637: 1617: 3218: 3178: 3113: 119:

DGG -- Thanks. And, sorry, I didn't see Sandstein's question two spots up. Sorry to clutter your talk page. --

2335:, but it seems the root word for the concept is "cardinalism", which is even the title of an academic book: 3281:

DGG: Could you give your opinion on a difference of views on a posting at the Mileva Maric discussion page?

3159: 2737: 2527: 2157: 1034: 995: 672: 3079: 2575: 694:

developments here, but there doesn't seem anything revolutionary. (yes I said pico--I like to keep things

421: 413: 406: 4052: 3653: 2675: 2633: 2583: 1885: 1423:

as one of its 100 most influential people of 2008, has decided not to continue with writing her draft for

1402: 1367: 841: 3942: 2269: 3902: 3661: 3033:

DGG: I have posted amended paragraphs on the Jeffrey Masson page. My reasons are given on my Talk page:

2990: 1789: 1575: 1284: 764: 746: 731: 594: 563: 528: 1075: 3951: 2250: 3880: 3844: 3811: 3761: 3726: 3706: 3606: 3574: 3566: 3372: 3320: 3256:

DGG: Any comment on my last posting in relation to the "Webster" section on the Jeffrey Masson page?

2811: 2778: 2518: 2417: 2004: 1966: 1950: 1902: 1835: 1803: 1775: 1531: 1425: 1413:

were sent a early version and were so impressed that they have included it on the 10-strong longlist.

1144: 501: 395: 3937:. (At that time I was putting various wine articles into categories and giving them assessments for 313:. I had originally tagged it as CSD spam because the author's name is obviously tied to the school ( 182: 4078: 3585: 2978: 2910: 2514: 2242: 1917: 1860: 1706: 1613: 1348:

task force has been proposed. Comments are welcomed on that proposal since we already have our own

885: 831: 777: 314: 281: 189: 3857:

fruit under the common name for it is not justified, and I'd want to see what others have to say.

3544: 2249:

notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on

1908:

An article you previously voted on in an AfD has been re-nominated. You can see the discussion at

1319: 955:

is currently holding a roll call, which we hope to have annually. Your username is listed on the

952: 931: 170: 3645: 3589: 3335: 3288: 3266: 3246: 3041: 2733: 2523: 2222: 2165: 1496: 989: 668: 425: 363: 322: 4041: 2598: 2149: 2145: 447:

yes, truly is a page made in error, sorry i didn't understand at first -- I've now deleted it.

226: 1310:

The members list is currently under review so we have moved all past active member's name to a

855:) 19:13, 6 September 2008 (UTC) -- fixed, thanks. as for the article, expert attention needed. 4049: 3959: 3469: 3003: 2960: 2819: 2699: 2368: 2118: 2081: 1869: 1717: 1123: 310: 3938: 2898: 2602: 2257: 490: 339: 4088: 4056: 4027: 4023: 4010: 4006: 3983: 3963: 3906: 3898: 3884: 3868: 3848: 3815: 3800: 3765: 3747: 3730: 3710: 3684: 3665: 3657: 3630: 3610: 3593: 3578: 3528: 3513: 3493: 3459: 3454: 3434: 3416: 3396: 3391: 3339: 3311: 3292: 3270: 3250: 3223: 3203: 3183: 3167: 3147: 3143: 3118: 3101: 3070: 3045: 3023: 2938: 2918: 2876: 2855: 2851: 2823: 2782: 2758: 2741: 2717: 2702: 2683: 2661: 2641: 2616: 2587: 2555: 2531: 2500: 2480: 2439: 2422: 2395: 2372: 2349: 2325: 2321: 2313: 2307: 2287: 2283: 2197: 2169: 2125: 2105: 2088: 2056: 2038: 2034: 2008: 1987: 1970: 1940: 1921: 1893: 1873: 1839: 1824: 1807: 1793: 1785: 1778: 1761: 1741: 1721: 1689: 1673: 1651: 1621: 1499:, who will introduce herself and speak on our forthcoming elections for extra Coordinators. 1372: 1172: 1147: 1143:

as a stub - hopefully with a bit more content than the last version must have had. Cheers,

1127: 1096: 1086: 1061: 1042: 1008: 921: 902: 866: 835: 813: 793: 768: 760: 750: 742: 735: 727: 709: 684: 598: 590: 567: 559: 552: 532: 524: 505: 476: 458: 441: 399: 371: 353: 330: 293: 237: 212: 191: 159: 135: 128: 114: 94: 77: 60: 4067: 4045: 881: 3876: 3840: 3807: 3757: 3722: 3702: 3602: 3570: 3094: 2774: 2411: 2000: 1962: 1831: 1799: 1506: 1416: 1259: 1140: 1133: 1030: 852: 497: 470: 435: 391: 147: 124: 73: 34: 3771: 4072: 3649: 3368: 2792:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Depression and natural therapies (2nd nomination)

1913: 1564: 1447: 1264: 1082:. Do you have access to the NYT archives? If so, could you please get me that snippet? 827: 628: 580:

Perhaps the article talk p. is the place to continue, so others can join. In any case,

275: 186: 40: 3257: 3240: 2770: 1678:

no problems at all. For a very notable author, its always worth checking for reviews.

494: 3979: 3864: 3796: 3743: 3680: 3626: 3548: 3524: 3509: 3489: 3412: 3331: 3307: 3284: 3262: 3242: 3199: 3066: 3037: 3018: 3012: 2934: 2872: 2754: 2657: 2612: 2551: 2496: 2476: 2435: 2391: 2345: 2303: 2193: 2161: 2101: 2052: 1983: 1936: 1820: 1757: 1737: 1685: 1558: 1420: 1376: 1168: 1057: 917: 862: 809: 705: 548: 454: 359: 349: 318: 208: 90: 56: 17: 3559:

Re: your revert of the informative text describing that dates are being delinked ...

2954:

Hi. I hope I am not misreading this, you appear to share my strong misgivings over

2210: 3955: 3890: 3831: 2955: 2815: 2467:

types of degrees as you want, and can call them whatever you want. Thus, there are

2364: 2114: 2077: 1865: 1713: 1596:

To unsubscribe from further issues of this newsletter please remove your name from

1119: 1115: 231: 185:

This article is not about a book, but a plan by an eleven year old to write a book.

139: 2457:, you wrote (since the AFD is now closed, I am responding on your personal Talk): 1450:, etc. Advice from any Novels project members would be valuable in assisting them. 658: 194:

Please archive your talk page, it is so long it does not load in a timely manner.

181:. Page creater = Zach135454 "Hill plans to release this at the end of 2009-2010." 2410:

I tracked down the entry and reported it at AN/I. The guy is highly litigious. --

4019: 4002: 3934: 3450: 3387: 3139: 2847: 2625: 2360: 2317: 2279: 2276: 2030: 1394: 1384: 1111: 390:, which was successful with 58 support, 4 oppose and 1 neutral. Kind regards. -- 143: 2455:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Master of Science in Marketing Management

1538:

The next collaboration is due for selection on 14 September, 2008 so cast your

3897:, which is one of several pages on the web with essentially the same content. 3088: 2727:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:No original research#Proposed text addition to the policy

2141: 1502: 1380: 1225: 1186: 1026: 945: 848: 465: 430: 120: 69: 1383:

and was released to coincide with the 100th anniversary of late Bond creator

3997: 3431: 1093: 1083: 698:

simple). If in doubt, AfD on a program like this will bring out the mavens.

620: 609: 3282: 1429:

after 12 chapters of the unfinished manuscript were leaked on the internet.

273:. I appreciate both the supports and the opposes. Thanks again and cheers! 177:

No references or connection to university stated. Detroit Vice is a novel

3894: 3974: 3859: 3791: 3738: 3675: 3621: 3520: 3504: 3485: 3407: 3302: 3194: 3061: 2929: 2867: 2749: 2714: 2652: 2607: 2572:

a unless tool and I will never look at your site for information again.

2546: 2491: 2472: 2430: 2386: 2340: 2298: 2188: 2160:

doesn't help the situation, either. That's all I want to say. Thank you,

2134: 2096: 2047: 1978: 1931: 1815: 1752: 1733: 1680: 1163: 1052: 912: 857: 804: 700: 581: 543: 449: 344: 203: 85: 51: 3972:

that, especially sincere there might well be a language problem for me.

3555:

and the following discussion that was left on the reverter's talk page.

3405:

will not know the words. A little more detail on the article talk page

3034: 1976:

thanks for letting me know, but I still think the same, and said so.

251: 3770:

To clarify, there are two sources under discussion. Source A is url=

2790:

and where is the discussion exactly? -- I gather this is relevant to

1406: 1398: 1495:

Next month's Newsletter will include a message from our Coordinator

49:

10:48, 31 August 2008 (UTC)::about to be unprotected in a few hours.

3774:

and the other material at that web site. Source B is the journal,

4070:. I just restored it, but don't have time for a lot of arguing. —— 910:

I edited my comment there. Sorry if I sounded too snappy. Thanks.

2332:

In fact, there is another use entirely, one in economic theory

2140:

I understand your frustration, but you really need to stop your

2072:

using it to prove bad faith on part of others (see second para)

1567:, who also provided us with tipline news for this newsletter. 1272:

on June 29 and then appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s Main Page as

3258:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Jeffrey_Moussaieff_Masson#Webster

3007: 2814:. Why can't we do the same with age? I would like some input. 4048:, and could be used as an example. Sorry for the confusion. – 3356:. If you can spare a few minutes of your time helping out at 3035:

http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Esterson#Esterson.27s_reply

412:

Hey there. Please review your decision to decline speedy for

3652:

are kept (the latter has certainly had major impacts on the

2260:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the 2209: 1224: 1185: 944: 2713:

paranoid about how I'm doing, how'd you "discover" me? :P

2237:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the 2148:

as much as he is. If you have a clear problem, initiate a

3925:

Hello DGG! I think you are referring to comments such as

2732:

Would you care to comment on this proposal? Thank you. --

2316:

was the creator I think and he has concurred on my talk.

463:

Sure, no problem. Thanks for it. Have a nice evening :-)

358:

Ah yes, I send people there all the time too. Cheers....

3239:

of the very lengthy section under the heading "Webster".

2840:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Octopus (politics)

2229:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also " 1326:. You may also wish to add your name to any of our many 722:

Hey DGG, just letting you know that I've managed to get

424:

to be able to add movies. I have explained it to him at

3930: 3926: 3552: 2996: 2984: 756: 741:

And now down to 0! Category is now cleared - woohoo! -

654: 650: 646: 428:

and I think the page can be removed as CSD#G2. Regards

3175:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/EliteAnswers.com

1276:

on August 26. It is the first article created through

3772:

http://www.idaholeadershipacademy.org/stoutReport.htm

3328:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Destination One

179:

that is hoped to be created by 11 year-old Zach Hill'

3830:

Hi DGG. Thanks for taking off the Prod comment from

826:

Thanks for the tip! I'll keep it in mind next time.

724:

Category:Articles with trivia sections from May 2007

3941:.) If you check the article I chose as an example, 2544:Quad relationships--that's not to the point here. 1961:. The main article's talk page is rather long... 4018:Never mind, this appears to be getting resolved. 3998:http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:My_Neighbor_Totoro 3756:? Can I challenge that type of source there? -- 2893:Thank you for your recent participation in the 1612:This newsletter was automatically delivered by 1352:which is covered under our Novels WikiProject. 1178:WikiProject Novels Newsletter - September 2008 663:before putting some lipstick on this pig. :-) 3752:What about the use of that type of source at 3326:Please see the comments that I just added at 2513:Thank you for what you said about my article 8: 2807:List of people who died before the age of 30 2801:List of people who died before the age of 30 3234:Proposal for Jeffrey Moussaieff Masson page 1798:Endorse. I'd even set up MiszaBot for you! 1318:. If you still consider yourself an active 1288:appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s Main Page as 1139:Just a heads up that I'm about to recreate 726:down from 265 articles down to about 50. - 3776:Evangel: A Ministry of Watchman Fellowship 3754:Criticism of the Latter Day Saint movement 3719:Criticism of the Latter Day Saint movement 2517:. I just wanted to expand on the article 1181: 246: 65:== Protection necessary/appropriate? ==]] 3444:yesterday. Kindly have a look at revised 1527:has been selected by popular vote and is 1322:editor, please add your name back to the 1208: 1184: 965:list. Also feel free to join any of our 3639:Thank you for the help on Rhys Williams 3448:vote at its AfD. Thanks for your time 489:Since you replied to my last message at 386:Thank you for your support in my recent 3345:People ganging up to disrupt an article 2221:template has been added to the article 1375:("writing as Ian Fleming"), has become 3277:Opinion sought on Mileva Maric posting 3029:Amended posting on Jeffrey Masson page 1859:DGG, I responded to your helpful post 1594: 1300:reached Good Article status on July 1. 151: 106: 28:User talk:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 3482:User talk:Kikkokalabud/Sandbox/Say OK 2805:It appears obvious now that the page 2115:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 2078:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 1350:WikiProject Novels/Fantasy task force 1278:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for creation 1080:about a painter named Bernard E. Ward 7: 3656:).Thank you again for your message. 309:Hi there. Thanks for the rewrite on 876:Hey, I noticed your remarks in the 3442:Talk:Indo-Aryan loanwords in Tamil 24: 3601:Thanks in advance for your time. 3354:Knowledge (XXG):Editor assistance 2235:Knowledge (XXG)'s deletion policy 1195:The WikiProject Novels Newsletter 971:and take a look at the project's 3474:User:Kikkokalabud/Sandbox/Say OK 2206:Proposed deletion of Cardinalist 1555:Our last newsletter's challenge 250: 3478:WP:Articles for deletion/Say OK 3177:as always I welcome your input 1401:the Chimp who is listed in the 1297:I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings 4089:21:31, 30 September 2008 (UTC) 4057:13:09, 30 September 2008 (UTC) 4028:09:34, 30 September 2008 (UTC) 4011:07:33, 30 September 2008 (UTC) 3964:12:16, 30 September 2008 (UTC) 3907:08:13, 29 September 2008 (UTC) 3885:03:59, 29 September 2008 (UTC) 3869:03:39, 29 September 2008 (UTC) 3849:03:35, 29 September 2008 (UTC) 3816:19:46, 29 September 2008 (UTC) 3801:19:12, 29 September 2008 (UTC) 3766:15:16, 29 September 2008 (UTC) 3748:05:58, 29 September 2008 (UTC) 3731:05:46, 29 September 2008 (UTC) 3711:05:41, 29 September 2008 (UTC) 3685:00:05, 29 September 2008 (UTC) 3666:23:10, 28 September 2008 (UTC) 3631:01:07, 28 September 2008 (UTC) 3611:23:47, 27 September 2008 (UTC) 3594:08:56, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 3579:23:27, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 3529:01:33, 28 September 2008 (UTC) 3514:01:12, 28 September 2008 (UTC) 3494:23:29, 27 September 2008 (UTC) 3460:23:21, 28 September 2008 (UTC) 3435:06:41, 28 September 2008 (UTC) 3417:23:11, 27 September 2008 (UTC) 3397:18:52, 27 September 2008 (UTC) 3340:16:16, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 3312:17:02, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 3293:12:04, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 3271:08:10, 30 September 2008 (UTC) 3251:05:07, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 3224:02:54, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 3204:02:37, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 3184:02:03, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 3168:00:17, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 3148:23:22, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 3134:has been rescheduled for next 3119:19:26, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 3102:19:43, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 3071:19:17, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 3046:11:27, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 3024:09:50, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 2939:22:32, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 2919:21:01, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 2877:06:49, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 2856:06:21, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 2824:23:11, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 2718:04:47, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 2703:01:33, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 2698:I just sent you a response. – 2684:11:35, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 2662:22:06, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 2642:21:37, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 2617:06:46, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 2588:05:42, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 2556:03:30, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 2532:03:08, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 2501:12:49, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 2481:07:25, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 2440:02:36, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 2423:02:34, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 2396:00:01, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 2373:23:50, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 2350:23:36, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 2326:20:37, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2308:18:39, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2288:18:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2198:23:47, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2170:23:31, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2126:03:43, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2106:03:18, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2089:01:21, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2057:18:57, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 2039:12:49, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 2009:20:58, 13 September 2008 (UTC) 1988:00:27, 13 September 2008 (UTC) 1971:23:28, 12 September 2008 (UTC) 1941:00:30, 13 September 2008 (UTC) 1922:21:25, 12 September 2008 (UTC) 1894:07:59, 12 September 2008 (UTC) 1874:06:49, 12 September 2008 (UTC) 1840:04:30, 12 September 2008 (UTC) 1825:04:07, 12 September 2008 (UTC) 1808:02:58, 12 September 2008 (UTC) 1794:02:42, 12 September 2008 (UTC) 1779:16:01, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 1762:04:27, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 1742:03:27, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 1722:22:49, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 1690:15:47, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 1674:15:34, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 1652:15:30, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 1622:14:39, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 1458:discussing a naming convention 1173:12:55, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 1148:07:35, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 1128:04:47, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 1110:Hi ! On your page you link to 418:Category:Films set in Michigan 338:There's an excellent guide, 1: 3826:Merge versus delete -- Baobab 3446:Indo-Aryan loanwords in Tamil 3377:Indo-Aryan loanwords in Tamil 3358:Indo-Aryan loanwords in Tamil 2268:, where it may be deleted if 2156:is not one of them. However, 1658:up a bit soon. All the best, 1097:08:51, 9 September 2008 (UTC) 1087:08:17, 9 September 2008 (UTC) 1062:03:18, 9 September 2008 (UTC) 1043:02:12, 9 September 2008 (UTC) 1035: 1009:15:07, 8 September 2008 (UTC) 983:Next month we will begin the 922:02:19, 9 September 2008 (UTC) 903:00:22, 8 September 2008 (UTC) 867:19:18, 6 September 2008 (UTC) 836:08:42, 6 September 2008 (UTC) 814:02:55, 6 September 2008 (UTC) 794:22:29, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 769:08:47, 9 September 2008 (UTC) 751:11:07, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 736:04:10, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 710:23:46, 3 September 2008 (UTC) 685:23:10, 3 September 2008 (UTC) 618:I'd like a second opinion on 599:13:22, 4 September 2008 (UTC) 568:17:38, 3 September 2008 (UTC) 553:17:13, 3 September 2008 (UTC) 533:16:54, 3 September 2008 (UTC) 506:16:02, 3 September 2008 (UTC) 477:23:46, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 459:23:40, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 442:23:29, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 400:21:29, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 372:20:09, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 354:19:32, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 331:19:29, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 294:19:13, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 261:, which did not succeed with 238:08:53, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 213:19:41, 1 September 2008 (UTC) 192:18:21, 1 September 2008 (UTC) 160:18:51, 1 September 2008 (UTC) 129:00:02, 1 September 2008 (UTC) 3048:== Christopher J. Olmeda == 2888:Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch 2708:Thanks for the welcome back! 2599:for how to write an article 1563:was completed by our member 1454:WikiProject Media franchises 1391:Me Cheeta: the Autobiography 1387:'s birthday on May 28, 1908. 1241:Issue XXVI - September 2008 941:WikiProject Novels Roll Call 405:Declined Speedy Deletion of 256: 155:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 110:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 3984:00:02, 1 October 2008 (UTC) 2783:20:56, 30 August 2008 (UTC) 2759:23:58, 30 August 2008 (UTC) 2742:20:34, 30 August 2008 (UTC) 2231:What Knowledge (XXG) is not 1199:Issue XXVI - September 2008 939: 152:Happy editing! Sincerely, 115:22:58, 31 August 2008 (UTC) 107:Happy editing! Sincerely, 95:21:39, 31 August 2008 (UTC) 78:21:07, 31 August 2008 (UTC) 61:23:28, 31 August 2008 (UTC) 4104: 3006:with a view to unblocking 1879:Thanks for the good advice 1548: 1518:Collaboration of the Month 1515: 1472: 1435: 1397:, is the autobiography of 1358: 1336: 1250: 1246: 1245: 1207: 1204: 249: 173:should be speedily deleted 3465:Help restoring an article 3127:rescheduled for October 4 2258:proposed deletion process 1705:Could you help with this 1444:Categories for Discussion 1411:Guardian First Book Award 521:Samuel Johnson's politics 517:Samuel Johnson's morality 3440:You had participated at 2773:that may concern you. -- 2262:speedy deletion criteria 1732:effective or much "fun". 1636:revert my edit. Thanks. 1290:Today's featured article 1274:Today's featured article 257:Thank you for voting in 4044:gives the same idea as 3547:, and at least one bot 3382:Could you please help? 3360:, I would be thankful. 3051:dgg, do you think this 2769:Hi. I put something on 2272:to delete is reached. 2158:fighting fire with fire 1631:Culture and Imperialism 1270:Featured Article status 1114:, presume it should be 1018:Your input is requested 878:AfD for Michael Hartman 872:AfD for Michael Hartman 585:3 September 2008 (UTC) 3929:and templates such as 3654:psychology of religion 2567:Global Delivery System 2227:criteria for inclusion 2214: 1959:AfD:Nassim Haramein #2 1403:Guinness World Records 1229: 1190: 949: 3697:Re: DeMille "warning" 3539:Your opinion on dates 3367:on words borrowed by 3080:Christopher J. Olmeda 2794:but that has closed., 2359:originally came from 2266:Articles for Deletion 2264:or it can be sent to 2213: 1285:To Kill a Mockingbird 1228: 1189: 948: 786:Nobody of Consequence 755:Big P.S. - you are a 615:Hello again, DGG ... 422:Films set in Michigan 414:Films set in Michigan 407:Films set in Michigan 3567:User talk:Lightmouse 3373:Indo-Aryan languages 3132:Wikis Take Manhattan 3125:Wikis Take Manhattan 2897:which closed with a 2519:Triad (relationship) 1551:Newsletter challenge 1532:Look Homeward, Angel 985:coordinator election 842:Talk:Hebrew of Jesus 3943:Barza Alba (winery) 3136:Saturday, October 4 2515:Quad (relationship) 2150:request for comment 2074:. Sad, isn't it? -- 1419:, who is listed by 1328:Project Task Forces 1324:Active Members List 1280:to become Featured. 930:Calling all active 3992:Collectonian again 3646:Robert K.C. Forman 3160:Paranormal Skeptic 3158:It's appreciated. 2601:, and in general 2509:Quad Relationships 2449:University degrees 2215: 2066:Fictional (?) book 1576:Griffin's Daughter 1361:Novel-related news 1346:Fantasy Literature 1235:Novels WikiProject 1230: 1191: 1076:Björn Gunnlaugsson 1015: 953:WikiProject Novels 950: 138:just restarted as 3921:Moldovan wineries 3834:. I am not fully 3470:User:Kikkokalabud 3100: 3022: 3004:user talk:Skoojal 2578:comment added by 2219:proposed deletion 1886:Catherineyronwode 1672: 1650: 1624: 1609: 1608: 1605: 1604: 1590: 1589: 1466: 1465: 1316:Project Roll Call 1038: 1007: 937: 899: 891: 882:argument to avoid 666:Happy Editing! — 311:West Dean College 305:West Dean College 299: 298: 225:It was listed at 48: 4095: 4087: 4075: 3952:Cojusna (winery) 3889:With respect to 3458: 3395: 3363:I am developing 3221: 3181: 3153:EliteAnswers.com 3116: 3099: 3097: 3086: 3053: 3052: 3016: 3000: 2973:deleted contribs 2603:our Business FAQ 2590: 2420: 2414: 2314:User:DavidBrooks 2248: 2247: 2241: 2123: 2121: 2086: 2084: 1670: 1666: 1664: 1648: 1644: 1642: 1611: 1470: 1469: 1373:Sebastian Faulks 1314:and are doing a 1248: 1247: 1206: 1205: 1182: 1039: 1036: 1004: 998: 993: 992: 977:to get involved! 895: 889: 662: 644: 473: 468: 438: 433: 290: 284: 278: 254: 247: 158: 156: 136:User:Dorftrottel 113: 111: 47: 45: 38: 4103: 4102: 4098: 4097: 4096: 4094: 4093: 4092: 4085: 4073: 4064: 4038: 4036:Re: dead people 3994: 3923: 3828: 3699: 3641: 3541: 3467: 3449: 3386: 3352:I found you at 3347: 3324: 3321:Destination One 3279: 3236: 3219: 3179: 3155: 3129: 3114: 3109: 3095: 3087: 3083: 3031: 2958: 2952: 2890: 2843: 2803: 2767: 2730: 2710: 2696: 2676:Malcolm Schosha 2634:Malcolm Schosha 2629: 2573: 2569: 2511: 2451: 2418: 2412: 2408: 2245: 2239: 2238: 2208: 2138: 2124: 2119: 2113: 2087: 2082: 2076: 2068: 2019: 1996: 1954: 1951:Nassim Haramein 1906: 1903:Jonathan Bishop 1881: 1857: 1776:KillerChihuahua 1772: 1729: 1700: 1668: 1660: 1646: 1638: 1633: 1438:Current debates 1417:Stephenie Meyer 1393:, written by a 1339:Task force news 1260:Margaret Atwood 1239: 1223: 1200: 1180: 1141:Anonymous class 1137: 1134:Anonymous class 1108: 1072: 1070:New York Times? 1020: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1002: 996: 988: 942: 936: 900: 874: 845: 824: 781: 720: 687: 635: 619: 613: 513: 487: 471: 466: 436: 431: 410: 384: 307: 288: 282: 276: 245: 223: 175: 154: 148:User:PhilKnight 109: 102:Knowledge (XXG) 41: 39: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4101: 4099: 4063: 4060: 4037: 4034: 4033: 4032: 4031: 4030: 3993: 3990: 3989: 3988: 3987: 3986: 3922: 3919: 3918: 3917: 3916: 3915: 3914: 3913: 3912: 3911: 3910: 3909: 3827: 3824: 3823: 3822: 3821: 3820: 3819: 3818: 3787: 3783: 3779: 3768: 3733: 3698: 3695: 3690: 3689: 3688: 3687: 3650:Hjalmar Sunden 3640: 3637: 3636: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3561: 3560: 3540: 3537: 3536: 3535: 3534: 3533: 3532: 3531: 3466: 3463: 3439: 3422: 3421: 3420: 3419: 3346: 3343: 3323: 3318: 3317: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3278: 3275: 3274: 3273: 3260: 3235: 3232: 3231: 3230: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3220:TravellingCari 3209: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3187: 3186: 3180:TravellingCari 3154: 3151: 3128: 3122: 3115:TravellingCari 3108: 3105: 3082: 3077: 3076: 3075: 3074: 3073: 3030: 3027: 2951: 2948: 2946: 2944: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2922: 2921: 2911:Colonel Warden 2889: 2886: 2884: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2859: 2858: 2842: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2802: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2766: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2729: 2724: 2722: 2709: 2706: 2695: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2628: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2620: 2619: 2568: 2565: 2563: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2510: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2464: 2463: 2450: 2447: 2445: 2443: 2442: 2407: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2207: 2204: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2184: 2137: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2112: 2075: 2067: 2064: 2062: 2060: 2059: 2018: 2017:Negative proof 2015: 2013: 1995: 1994:Charles Linden 1992: 1991: 1990: 1953: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1905: 1900: 1898: 1880: 1877: 1856: 1853: 1851: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1771: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1728: 1725: 1699: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1632: 1629: 1627: 1614:TinucherianBot 1607: 1606: 1603: 1602: 1592: 1591: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1581: 1553: 1552: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1537: 1528: 1520: 1519: 1513: 1512: 1510: 1480: 1479: 1467: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1451: 1448:eidetic memory 1440: 1439: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1414: 1388: 1368:Devil May Care 1363: 1362: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1341: 1340: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1312:Incumbent List 1307: 1306: 1302: 1301: 1293: 1281: 1265:The Penelopiad 1255: 1254: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1240: 1231: 1209: 1202: 1201: 1198: 1192: 1179: 1176: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1136: 1131: 1107: 1104: 1102: 1100: 1099: 1071: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1019: 1016: 962:Active Members 951: 943: 940: 938: 935: 928: 927: 926: 925: 924: 894: 873: 870: 844: 839: 823: 820: 819: 818: 817: 816: 780: 775: 774: 773: 772: 771: 719: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 683: 612: 607: 606: 605: 604: 603: 602: 601: 575: 574: 573: 572: 571: 570: 512: 509: 486: 483: 482: 481: 480: 479: 409: 403: 383: 380: 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 306: 303: 301: 297: 296: 255: 244: 241: 222: 219: 218: 217: 216: 215: 174: 168: 167: 166: 165: 164: 163: 162: 117: 30: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4100: 4091: 4090: 4084: 4080: 4077: 4076: 4069: 4061: 4059: 4058: 4055: 4053: 4051: 4047: 4043: 4035: 4029: 4025: 4021: 4017: 4016: 4015: 4014: 4013: 4012: 4008: 4004: 3999: 3991: 3985: 3981: 3977: 3976: 3970: 3969: 3968: 3967: 3966: 3965: 3961: 3957: 3953: 3948: 3944: 3940: 3936: 3932: 3928: 3920: 3908: 3904: 3900: 3896: 3892: 3888: 3887: 3886: 3882: 3878: 3874: 3873: 3872: 3871: 3870: 3866: 3862: 3861: 3855: 3854: 3853: 3852: 3851: 3850: 3846: 3842: 3837: 3833: 3825: 3817: 3813: 3809: 3804: 3803: 3802: 3798: 3794: 3793: 3788: 3784: 3780: 3777: 3773: 3769: 3767: 3763: 3759: 3755: 3751: 3750: 3749: 3745: 3741: 3740: 3734: 3732: 3728: 3724: 3720: 3715: 3714: 3713: 3712: 3708: 3704: 3696: 3694: 3686: 3682: 3678: 3677: 3672: 3671: 3670: 3669: 3668: 3667: 3663: 3659: 3655: 3651: 3647: 3638: 3632: 3628: 3624: 3623: 3617: 3616: 3615: 3614: 3613: 3612: 3608: 3604: 3595: 3591: 3587: 3582: 3581: 3580: 3576: 3572: 3568: 3563: 3562: 3558: 3557: 3556: 3554: 3550: 3546: 3538: 3530: 3526: 3522: 3517: 3516: 3515: 3511: 3507: 3506: 3500: 3499: 3498: 3497: 3496: 3495: 3491: 3487: 3483: 3479: 3475: 3471: 3464: 3462: 3461: 3456: 3452: 3447: 3443: 3437: 3436: 3433: 3428: 3425: 3418: 3414: 3410: 3409: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3393: 3389: 3383: 3380: 3378: 3374: 3370: 3366: 3361: 3359: 3355: 3350: 3344: 3342: 3341: 3337: 3333: 3329: 3322: 3319: 3313: 3309: 3305: 3304: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3294: 3290: 3286: 3283: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3264: 3261: 3259: 3255: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3248: 3244: 3241: 3233: 3225: 3222: 3215: 3214: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3205: 3201: 3197: 3196: 3191: 3190: 3189: 3188: 3185: 3182: 3176: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3165: 3161: 3152: 3150: 3149: 3145: 3141: 3137: 3133: 3126: 3123: 3121: 3120: 3117: 3106: 3104: 3103: 3098: 3092: 3091: 3081: 3078: 3072: 3068: 3064: 3063: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3049: 3047: 3043: 3039: 3036: 3028: 3026: 3025: 3020: 3015: 3014: 3009: 3005: 2998: 2995: 2992: 2989: 2986: 2983: 2980: 2977: 2974: 2971: 2968: 2965: 2962: 2957: 2949: 2947: 2940: 2936: 2932: 2931: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2920: 2916: 2912: 2908: 2904: 2900: 2896: 2892: 2891: 2887: 2885: 2878: 2874: 2870: 2869: 2863: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2857: 2853: 2849: 2845: 2844: 2841: 2838: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2821: 2817: 2813: 2808: 2800: 2793: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2772: 2764: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2751: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2739: 2735: 2734:Phenylalanine 2728: 2725: 2723: 2720: 2719: 2716: 2707: 2705: 2704: 2701: 2693: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2663: 2659: 2655: 2654: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2639: 2635: 2627: 2624: 2618: 2614: 2610: 2609: 2604: 2600: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2589: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2566: 2564: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2548: 2543: 2538: 2537: 2536: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2529: 2525: 2520: 2516: 2508: 2502: 2498: 2494: 2493: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2482: 2478: 2474: 2470: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2456: 2448: 2446: 2441: 2437: 2433: 2432: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2421: 2415: 2405: 2397: 2393: 2389: 2388: 2382: 2374: 2370: 2366: 2362: 2358: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2347: 2343: 2342: 2337: 2334: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2323: 2319: 2315: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2300: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2285: 2281: 2278: 2273: 2271: 2267: 2263: 2259: 2254: 2252: 2251:its talk page 2244: 2236: 2232: 2228: 2224: 2220: 2212: 2205: 2199: 2195: 2191: 2190: 2185: 2181: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2153: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2136: 2133: 2127: 2122: 2116: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2103: 2099: 2098: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2085: 2079: 2073: 2065: 2063: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2049: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2036: 2032: 2029:Much thanks. 2027: 2023: 2016: 2014: 2011: 2010: 2006: 2002: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1980: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1960: 1952: 1949: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1933: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1904: 1901: 1899: 1896: 1895: 1891: 1887: 1878: 1876: 1875: 1871: 1867: 1863: 1862: 1854: 1852: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1817: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1791: 1787: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1777: 1769: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1754: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1739: 1735: 1726: 1724: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1710: 1708: 1703: 1697: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1682: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1671: 1665: 1663: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1649: 1643: 1641: 1630: 1628: 1625: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1601: 1599: 1593: 1584: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1566: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559:The Pure Land 1550: 1549: 1547: 1541: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1526: 1525:Collaboration 1523:This month's 1522: 1521: 1517: 1516: 1514: 1511: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1498: 1493: 1491: 1490: 1484: 1478: 1474: 1473: 1471: 1468: 1459: 1455: 1452: 1449: 1445: 1442: 1441: 1437: 1436: 1434: 1428: 1427: 1422: 1421:Time magazine 1418: 1415: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1389: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1377:Penguin Books 1374: 1371:, written by 1370: 1369: 1365: 1364: 1360: 1359: 1357: 1351: 1347: 1343: 1342: 1338: 1337: 1335: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1309: 1308: 1304: 1303: 1299: 1298: 1294: 1291: 1287: 1286: 1282: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1266: 1261: 1257: 1256: 1252: 1251: 1249: 1238: 1236: 1227: 1222: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1203: 1197: 1196: 1188: 1183: 1177: 1175: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1165: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1146: 1142: 1135: 1132: 1130: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1106:Post doc link 1105: 1103: 1098: 1095: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1069: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1054: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1040: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1017: 1011: 1010: 1005: 999: 991: 986: 981: 979: 976: 975: 970: 969: 964: 963: 958: 954: 947: 933: 929: 923: 919: 915: 914: 909: 908: 907: 906: 905: 904: 898: 892: 888: 883: 879: 871: 869: 868: 864: 860: 859: 854: 850: 843: 840: 838: 837: 833: 829: 821: 815: 811: 807: 806: 800: 799: 798: 797: 796: 795: 791: 787: 779: 778:Jason Fortuny 776: 770: 766: 762: 758: 754: 753: 752: 748: 744: 740: 739: 738: 737: 733: 729: 725: 717: 711: 707: 703: 702: 697: 692: 691: 690: 689: 688: 686: 682: 680: 677: 674: 670: 669:72.75.117.122 664: 660: 656: 652: 648: 643: 639: 634: 630: 626: 622: 616: 611: 608: 600: 596: 592: 587: 586: 583: 579: 578: 577: 576: 569: 565: 561: 556: 555: 554: 550: 546: 545: 539: 538: 537: 536: 535: 534: 530: 526: 522: 518: 510: 508: 507: 503: 499: 495: 492: 484: 478: 475: 474: 469: 462: 461: 460: 456: 452: 451: 446: 445: 444: 443: 440: 439: 434: 427: 426:his talk page 423: 419: 415: 408: 404: 402: 401: 397: 393: 389: 381: 373: 369: 365: 361: 357: 356: 355: 351: 347: 346: 341: 337: 336: 335: 334: 333: 332: 328: 324: 320: 316: 315:User:Westdean 312: 304: 302: 295: 292: 291: 285: 279: 272: 268: 264: 260: 253: 248: 242: 240: 239: 236: 235: 234: 228: 220: 214: 210: 206: 205: 199: 198: 197: 196: 195: 193: 190: 188: 184: 180: 172: 169: 161: 157: 149: 145: 141: 137: 132: 131: 130: 126: 122: 118: 116: 112: 103: 98: 97: 96: 92: 88: 87: 82: 81: 80: 79: 75: 71: 66: 63: 62: 58: 54: 53: 46: 44: 36: 29: 26: 19: 18:User talk:DGG 4071: 4065: 4050:Juliancolton 4039: 3995: 3973: 3946: 3924: 3891:Baobab fruit 3875:Thanks DGG. 3858: 3835: 3832:Baobab fruit 3829: 3790: 3775: 3737: 3700: 3691: 3674: 3642: 3620: 3600: 3542: 3503: 3468: 3438: 3429: 3426: 3423: 3406: 3384: 3381: 3362: 3351: 3348: 3325: 3301: 3280: 3237: 3193: 3156: 3135: 3130: 3110: 3089: 3084: 3060: 3050: 3032: 3011: 2993: 2987: 2981: 2975: 2969: 2963: 2953: 2945: 2928: 2902: 2883: 2866: 2804: 2768: 2748: 2747:& I did 2731: 2721: 2711: 2697: 2651: 2630: 2606: 2580:68.97.235.38 2570: 2562: 2545: 2541: 2512: 2490: 2468: 2465: 2453:On the page 2452: 2444: 2429: 2409: 2385: 2356: 2339: 2297: 2274: 2255: 2216: 2187: 2179: 2154: 2139: 2095: 2069: 2061: 2046: 2028: 2024: 2020: 2012: 1997: 1977: 1955: 1930: 1907: 1897: 1882: 1864: 1858: 1850: 1814: 1773: 1751: 1730: 1727:Abuse filter 1711: 1704: 1701: 1679: 1661: 1639: 1634: 1626: 1610: 1595: 1582: 1574: 1573: 1557: 1556: 1554: 1530: 1529: 1501: 1494: 1487: 1485: 1481: 1426:Midnight Sun 1424: 1390: 1366: 1315: 1295: 1283: 1263: 1253:Project news 1232: 1210: 1193: 1162: 1160: 1138: 1116:Allan Wilson 1109: 1101: 1073: 1051: 1021: 982: 980: 978: 972: 967: 961: 957:members list 911: 886: 875: 856: 846: 825: 803: 782: 721: 699: 695: 675: 667: 665: 617: 614: 542: 514: 488: 485:Ramachandran 464: 448: 429: 411: 385: 343: 308: 300: 274: 270: 266: 262: 232: 230: 224: 202: 178: 176: 171:Detroit Vice 140:User:Everyme 101: 84: 67: 64: 50: 42: 32: 4046:WP:NOT#NEWS 3947:the article 3935:User:Serhio 3899:Lavateraguy 3658:ACEOREVIVED 3553:this revert 3107:Fire Museum 2812:1949 deaths 2765:3rd opinion 2626:Prohairesis 2574:—Preceding 2413:Orange Mike 2361:Cardinality 2223:Cardinalist 1786:Ottava Rima 1770:Section 270 1395:ghostwriter 1385:Ian Fleming 1305:Member news 1292:on July 11. 1145:Ben Aveling 1112:Alan Wilson 968:task forces 761:Tbsdy lives 743:Tbsdy lives 728:Tbsdy lives 591:Ottava Rima 560:Ottava Rima 525:Ottava Rima 144:User:Addhoc 3877:Bongomatic 3841:Bongomatic 3808:TrustTruth 3758:TrustTruth 3723:TrustTruth 3703:TrustTruth 3603:Truthanado 3571:Truthanado 3569:. Thanks. 3385:Thanks. 3365:an article 2991:block user 2985:filter log 2907:discussion 2901:result of 2775:Firefly322 2524:Lord Balin 2243:dated prod 2142:ad hominem 2001:Colliver55 1963:Ace blazer 1832:EdJohnston 1800:EdJohnston 1489:Job Centre 1381:James Bond 1237:Newsletter 974:Job Centre 515:I created 498:Robert K S 392:Malcolmxl5 263:47 support 243:RfA thanks 221:Raj khanna 183:WP:CRYSTAL 43:Sandstein 4066:Alert on 3895:this page 3893:see also 3545:WP:MOSNUM 2997:block log 2469:countless 2270:consensus 2183:articles. 1914:Cardydwen 1910:This link 1855:Responded 1750:of it. :) 1565:Maclean25 1509:), Editor 1475:From the 1320:WP:NOVELS 1023:Comments? 932:WP:NOVELS 828:Antivenin 621:RJ TextEd 610:RJ TextEd 271:1 neutral 267:21 oppose 4042:WP:BLP1E 3931:this one 3927:this one 3586:Kotniski 3549:Lightbot 3332:Eastmain 3285:Esterson 3263:Esterson 3243:Esterson 3038:Esterson 2967:contribs 2576:unsigned 2522:website. 2357:probably 2162:MuZemike 2146:WP:POINT 2135:User:TTN 1712:Thanks, 1483:issue. 1268:reached 1216:Tip Line 1212:Archives 679:contribs 582:moralism 368:contribs 360:justinfr 327:contribs 319:justinfr 227:WP:AFD/O 3956:Tomas e 3939:WP:WINE 3836:au fait 3519:merged. 2956:Skoojal 2950:Skoojal 2816:Sebwite 2365:Protonk 1866:Twerges 1714:Twerges 1477:Members 1220:Editors 1120:Shyamal 934:members 890:endaliv 638:protect 633:history 511:Johnson 491:WP:HARM 340:WP:BFAQ 233:Hut 8.5 146:became 4074:Martin 4068:WP:NOR 4020:JJJ999 4003:JJJ999 3140:Pharos 2848:JuJube 2542:defend 2462:about. 2406:Thanks 2318:Mcewan 2280:Mcewan 2277:Mcewan 2233:" and 2031:Phiwum 1662:Verbal 1640:Verbal 1407:Tarzan 1399:Cheeta 1262:novel 822:Thanks 757:legend 718:Trivia 642:delete 382:My RfA 269:, and 259:my RfA 3371:from 3369:Tamil 3300:done. 3096:Chat 3090:Pedro 3019:Help! 2694:Email 2180:doing 2120:talk 2083:talk 1707:issue 1702:DGG, 1503:Boylo 1497:Maria 1027:Filll 997:habla 990:María 849:RMHED 659:views 651:watch 647:links 187:PB666 121:EEMIV 70:EEMIV 35:WP:PP 16:< 4024:talk 4007:talk 3980:talk 3960:talk 3903:talk 3881:talk 3865:talk 3845:talk 3812:talk 3797:talk 3762:talk 3744:talk 3727:talk 3707:talk 3681:talk 3662:talk 3648:and 3627:talk 3607:talk 3590:talk 3575:talk 3525:talk 3510:talk 3490:talk 3480:and 3455:talk 3451:Kris 3432:jc37 3413:talk 3392:talk 3388:Kris 3349:Hi, 3336:talk 3330:. -- 3308:talk 3289:talk 3267:talk 3247:talk 3200:talk 3164:talk 3144:talk 3067:talk 3042:talk 2979:logs 2961:talk 2935:talk 2915:talk 2903:Keep 2899:snow 2873:talk 2852:talk 2820:talk 2779:talk 2771:WP:3 2755:talk 2738:talk 2680:talk 2658:talk 2638:talk 2613:talk 2584:talk 2552:talk 2528:talk 2497:talk 2477:talk 2436:talk 2419:Talk 2392:talk 2369:talk 2346:talk 2322:talk 2304:talk 2284:talk 2194:talk 2166:talk 2102:talk 2053:talk 2035:talk 2005:talk 1984:talk 1967:talk 1937:talk 1918:talk 1890:talk 1870:talk 1861:here 1836:talk 1821:talk 1804:talk 1790:talk 1758:talk 1738:talk 1718:talk 1698:Help 1686:talk 1669:chat 1647:chat 1618:talk 1598:here 1540:vote 1507:talk 1258:The 1233:The 1169:talk 1124:talk 1094:Lupo 1084:Lupo 1058:talk 1031:talk 1003:migo 918:talk 884:! —/ 863:talk 853:talk 832:talk 810:talk 790:talk 765:talk 759:. - 747:talk 732:talk 706:talk 696:very 673:talk 655:logs 629:talk 625:edit 595:talk 564:talk 549:talk 529:talk 519:and 502:talk 455:talk 396:talk 364:talk 350:talk 323:talk 209:talk 142:and 125:talk 91:talk 74:talk 57:talk 4062:NOR 3975:DGG 3860:DGG 3792:DGG 3739:DGG 3676:DGG 3622:DGG 3521:Kww 3505:DGG 3486:Kww 3408:DGG 3303:DGG 3195:DGG 3062:DGG 3013:Guy 3008:iff 2930:DGG 2909:. 2895:AFD 2868:DGG 2750:DGG 2715:Mo0 2700:SJL 2653:DGG 2608:DGG 2547:DGG 2492:DGG 2473:SJK 2431:DGG 2416:| 2387:DGG 2341:DGG 2299:DGG 2189:DGG 2097:DGG 2048:DGG 1979:DGG 1932:DGG 1816:DGG 1753:DGG 1734:Kww 1681:DGG 1218:| 1214:| 1164:DGG 1053:DGG 1037:wpc 1000:con 913:DGG 897:Δ's 858:DGG 805:DGG 701:DGG 544:DGG 472:Why 450:DGG 437:Why 420:to 388:RfA 345:DGG 289:Man 204:DGG 86:DGG 52:DGG 4086:—— 4081:Ψ 4026:) 4009:) 3982:) 3962:) 3905:) 3883:) 3867:) 3847:) 3814:) 3799:) 3764:) 3746:) 3729:) 3709:) 3683:) 3664:) 3629:) 3609:) 3592:) 3577:) 3527:) 3512:) 3492:) 3415:) 3338:) 3310:) 3291:) 3269:) 3249:) 3202:) 3166:) 3146:) 3093:: 3069:) 3044:) 2937:) 2917:) 2875:) 2854:) 2822:) 2781:) 2757:) 2740:) 2682:) 2660:) 2640:) 2615:) 2586:) 2554:) 2530:) 2499:) 2479:) 2438:) 2394:) 2371:) 2348:) 2324:) 2306:) 2286:) 2253:. 2246:}} 2240:{{ 2217:A 2196:) 2168:) 2104:) 2055:) 2037:) 2007:) 1986:) 1969:) 1939:) 1920:) 1912:. 1892:) 1872:) 1838:) 1823:) 1806:) 1792:) 1760:) 1740:) 1720:) 1709:. 1688:) 1620:) 1600:. 1580:. 1536:. 1344:A 1171:) 1126:) 1118:. 1060:) 1041:) 1033:| 1025:-- 920:) 901:/ 893:// 865:) 834:) 812:) 792:) 767:) 749:) 734:) 708:) 657:| 653:| 649:| 645:| 640:| 636:| 631:| 627:| 597:) 566:) 551:) 531:) 504:) 467:So 457:) 432:So 398:) 370:) 352:) 329:) 277:TN 265:, 211:) 127:) 93:) 76:) 59:) 4083:Φ 4079:☎ 4022:( 4005:( 3978:( 3958:( 3901:( 3879:( 3863:( 3843:( 3810:( 3795:( 3760:( 3742:( 3725:( 3705:( 3679:( 3660:( 3625:( 3605:( 3588:( 3573:( 3523:( 3508:( 3488:( 3457:) 3453:( 3411:( 3394:) 3390:( 3334:( 3306:( 3287:( 3265:( 3245:( 3198:( 3162:( 3142:( 3065:( 3040:( 3021:) 3017:( 2999:) 2994:· 2988:· 2982:· 2976:· 2970:· 2964:· 2959:( 2933:( 2913:( 2871:( 2850:( 2818:( 2777:( 2753:( 2736:( 2678:( 2656:( 2636:( 2611:( 2582:( 2550:( 2526:( 2495:( 2475:( 2434:( 2390:( 2367:( 2344:( 2320:( 2302:( 2282:( 2192:( 2164:( 2117:| 2100:( 2080:| 2051:( 2033:( 2003:( 1982:( 1965:( 1943:. 1935:( 1916:( 1888:( 1868:( 1834:( 1819:( 1802:( 1788:( 1756:( 1736:( 1716:( 1684:( 1616:( 1542:. 1505:( 1330:. 1167:( 1122:( 1056:( 1029:( 1006:) 994:( 916:( 887:M 861:( 851:( 830:( 808:( 788:( 763:( 745:( 730:( 704:( 681:) 676:· 671:( 661:) 623:( 593:( 562:( 547:( 527:( 500:( 453:( 394:( 366:/ 362:( 348:( 325:/ 321:( 286:- 283:X 280:‑ 207:( 123:( 89:( 72:( 55:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index