Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:DKalkin/Archive 2 (Mar 06 - Dec 06)

Source 📝

202:) against the use of a blanket term. There I write, "As much as I favor a standardized language for encyclopedia articles, the immigration issue is close to my heart. Personally, I am willing to begrudge the use of the term "illegal". However, I tend to believe that instead of using a single term in every instance, we should allow for some lexical flexibility allow for greater precision in in order to account for the nuances in individual situations." 376:
proclaimed Socialists or proponents of Trotskyism or other such ilk; yet none are listed in the "sources of oposition" column. It is obvious that your worldviews have a direct connection to your anti-war sentiments. Nor do you list "draft dodger" next to "consciencous objector". The hidding of agendas and hipocracy with the evoking of "neutral point of view" is amusing.
64: 216:
any documents whatsover," but "without proper immigration documents." An undocumented border-crosser might have forged documents, or for that matter medical documents, or whatever. But feel free to write a proposal for "unauthorized," stealing whatever language is necessary from the proposal for "undocumented."
290:
As for the euphemism treadmill - well, lets worry about changing connotations when connotations change, we have enough of a problem in the short term to occupy us. And I wouldn't be too sure that the whole ideology of immigration won't change, with the kind of movement that can get a million people
923:
It doesn't. Not in the quoted section in the article, and not in the rest of the letter, which I just read. It does however contain a revealing quote saying that Massad "promote vile and insidious anti-Semitic hatred in the language of anti-Zionism" - ie Schreiber's belief is that anti-Zionism is
433:
I'm on a different computer, but I will start a profile up later tonight. I will endeavor to be constructive as well. Currently there is a discussion on adding in "fellow traveler" into the "sources of opposition" section. The Antiwar topics discussion page has the conversation between myself and
215:
I don't have much of a problem with "unauthorized immigrant," but I don't believe it's as common as "undocumented," and I'm afraid it may be something of a neologism - I've never heard it, at least. And "undocumented" does accurately describe people with overstayed visas - it doesn't mean "without
680:
I have indeed read the naming conventions discussion. In fact, I posted a comprehensive overview summarizing the case for "illegal immigrant" versus the other proposed terms several days ago. In this way I do indeed believe that I am "helping to contribute to a standard." I hope you don't think
491:
I realized from you, that it is smarter to ignore these wikipedians, let them bray on the talk page and only react when they change the text of the article itself. When I argue with these wikiusers, it gets them angry and emotional, and causes me to work harder in protecting what we have spent so
375:
I find it facinating that you invoke the "nuetral point of view" policy, when it is clear by looking at the links, that there is a definate biased agenda being set by what is listed. The current list of links is not neutral. Every objection to modificaitons I have seen so far have been from self
1110:
No problem. The article was mostly very neutral but not entirely in standard Wiki format, which I've tried to correct. I've also commented on the request for deletion page. I have strong opinions against deleting third-party candidates as non-notable. It's a minor part of the self-fulfilling
313:
If, as some dictionaries in their weasely "oh, we're just describing how people use the word" ways claim, "illegal" is indeed an adjective with two distinct meanings, one of which is "in a country in violation of its laws", then people wouldn't constantly be trying the "they're doing something
272:
My discussion of the meaning of "undocumented" above comes simply from how I've heard it used. It appears to be conventional, at least within the immigrant rights movement, to use it for all immigrants without proper and current legal authorization. The American Heritage dictionary gives the
191:. The argument is essentially based on a rejection of permitting the law (i.e., legislators and law enforcement authorities) to be the standard by which issues are evaluated. This is particularly important here in Knowledge (XXG), where we are in the process of creating our own standards. 924:
anti-Semitism, and this is the basis for his view of Massad. There is, I suppose, a case to be made for this, although it rests on a highly suspicious and itself arguably anti-Semitic equation of Israel and Judaism, but it suggests that Category:Anti-Zionists ought to be sufficient.
314:
illegal, so they're illegal immigrants" line of "argument"; that they are shows that it is indeed the same adjective being used, and that the people version is somehow thought of as an extension of the action version. (I do share your concern that this is dehumanising).
255:
Were it not for your definition of "undocumented", I would consider your proposal sound. Where does it come from? You can reply here since I have put this page on my watchlist. And I'll let the other editors know, but I don't know how soon I can do
1017:
The reputation of the ADL... you know not of what you speak. The ADL has a reputation on the left as habitually smearing advocates of freedom for Palestine as anti-Semites, and this reputation is well-earned, as the ANSWER articles demonstrate.
245:. It may be something of a neologism, as I know of no other authors who use the term. But were it to come into common use, it is likely that it would acquire a connotation that is just as negative as "illegal". We have the problem of the 1228:
of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
1202:
of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
1176:
of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
1075:
of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
735:
of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
629:
of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
469:
of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
1142:
Sounds pretty fair to me. I'm not sure what "left-wing" means in any case. I wouldn't have described Benny Morris in that way - if "left-wing" means reporting the evidence, then I might be forced to describe myself in the same fashion!
824:. The page has been static for months, and the only comments we get are from wikipedians on the talk page. I trust you will protect the page from vandals, etc. I trust your edits. If you get in an edit war, please let me know, okay? 681:
I'm on sort of mission to demonize here, only to standardize. That includes abandoning potentially offensive terms such as "illegal alien" as well as imprecise neologisms like "undocumented worker". Feel free to respond to my post on
1120:
Thanks. It's much better now. I'll take note and learn from your improvements. I agree with your opinion on censoring third party candidates. It's unfortunate if WikiPedia ends up emulating the bi-partisan bias in American mass media.
1100:, Libertarian candidate for Senator from California. I think you would be well suited to edit the page for neutrality in language, given your interest in California politics and as a Trotskyist clearly different political position. 1071: 1224: 1198: 1172: 731: 625: 465: 194:
Secondly, the term "undocumented" is inaccurate for the 40% of unauthorized immigrants (in the United States, at least) who have overstayed their visas. These people have documentation, but it is just not current.
939:
I was very pleased to know that someone else was also not happy with some of what was written on the Rashid Khalidi page. It sure was very biased but now, with your contributions, it is more neutral. Good work.
704: 655: 309:
First of all, let me second the WikiThanks. The proposal is definitely something that should be discussed, though my personal opinion would be to avoid both terms at all costs, except in direct quotes.
1028:
Actually you are misinfomed, the ADL speaks out against anti-semetism, racism and other hate speech. ANSWER hides behind it's name just the way other hate groups on the left and right do. MagicKirin
219:
I agree that lexical flexibility is good, especially in allowing the use of more specific terms, and that might be something you could add to the "Where possible, avoid controversial terms" section.
228:
Oh and finally I don't really know who's regularly involved in immigration editing. I'm primarily involved in war- and anti-war-related articles, but have had arguments on this issue come up on the
184:. I hope to add to it shortly. You may want to alert some of the editors who are active on immigration-related topics directly via their talkpages. I will likely do so if you don't get around to it. 760: 343:
Where did I give the impression that I don't want my writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others? I do know Knowledge (XXG) policy - please be more specific. Thank you.
403:
My worldview does, of course, have a direct connection to my views on war. I assume yours does too. What it doesn't have a direct connection to is my Knowledge (XXG) edits. Please
133: 129: 147: 978:
Your comments on ANSWER were inaccurate, but that's not the point. Your comments were uncited and controversial and therefore do not belong, regardless of their truth. See
604: 110: 106: 1139:
Morris is no longer in any meaningful sense left wing - he explicitly advocates ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, as the only alternative to giving up Zionism <<
411:
to a list of sources of anti-war opposition in disregard for Knowledge (XXG)'s neutral point of view policy. But prove me wrong - make your future edits constructive.
893:
The exception is only if the potentially libelous material is not sourced or poorly sourced. In this case it is reliably sourced, so the exception does not hold. --
252:
I was actually just hoping to make my arguments part of the discussion that will occur as part of your proposal--I had no intention of formulating a new proposal.
241:
You're right, it's not common, which is why it doesn't have the same stigma that "illegal" does, and is perhaps the reason it is used by Joseph Nevin, author of
682: 392:
What is not neutral about the list of links? You spend a lot of time talking about agendas, but little demonstrating concrete problems. Just for you, I added
181: 782: 793: 1146: 958: 1158: 992:
There are accurate the reputation of the ADL speaks for itself. Also ANSWER can characterize itself as one thing, but the reality is something else.
654:
selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please
700: 651: 643: 155: 140: 122: 1055:
if you agree with the link's value. By the way, you're welcome to ask for my vote to keep any information on this website. Thanks for your help!
551:
You may want to delete that stupid template below this message--every message people try to message you under the template modifies the template
513:
Uh, thanks, I guess, although I don't think that lesson can really be attributed to me. I've been sucked into talk-page debates, for example on
1051:). You look as if you're a valuable editor and I could really use some help a great link. I would ask you to review the discussion and vote 356:
article. When your block expires, feel free to edit other people's work mercilessly, but please make some effort to follow Knowledge (XXG)'s
48:
don't worry, i've written worse things than that. leave a text for a few months, and you never know what you'll find when you get back...
74:! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of topics related to military history. 600: 593: 357: 903:
I think hearsay which does not quote Massad directly is certainly too poorly sourced for an accusation as serious as anti-Semitism.
158:, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! 174: 703:
election has begun. We will select seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of eleven candidates. Please
1008: 970: 96: 89: 117:
There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:
92:
is updated quite regularly. You can watch it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including
1047:
Hi! I got your username from the Association Inclusionist Wikipedians. I'm trying to work against a band of linkocrites (see
336:
Dkalkin, Please note: If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it.
404: 1154: 291:
off work and in the streets just appearing, plus the longer-term demographic trends in the U.S. We can hope, at least...
82: 188: 517:, but I've managed to avoid this one because I was tired of the topic just from doing so much work on the article. 484:
For the past six months, I have gone back and forth with wikipedians arguing that America is not an empire, on the
955:
My comments on ANSWER were entirely accurate; listen to the venon spewed at their rallies. Please reinstate them.
1150: 879:
There is an exception to the 3RR rule for biographies of living persons which I believe covers this case. See
353: 854:
I am new to this process but thanks for straightening out my mistake with the disambiguation page. Podiatrist
488:
page. At first this was interesting, but it has now become very tiring. You have kept out of this argument.
996: 1237: 1211: 1185: 1125: 1115: 1104: 1085: 1059: 1036: 1022: 986: 944: 928: 917: 907: 897: 887: 873: 843: 833: 807: 772: 745: 718: 689: 669: 613: 583: 563: 545: 521: 507: 474: 447: 420: 397: 386: 364: 347: 326: 295: 260: 236: 223: 209: 162: 52: 38: 28: 444: 383: 1004: 966: 829: 803: 768: 559: 541: 533: 503: 284:...which seems ambiguous on the issue, depending on how you interpret "needed." From dictionary.com. 71: 1097: 610: 471: 276:
1. Not supported by written evidence: undocumented income tax deductions; undocumented accusations.
246: 159: 607:. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 269:
section." If you're still in favor of "unauthorized immigrant," please do that, if you have time.
199: 825: 799: 764: 555: 537: 499: 35: 49: 17: 979: 869:. Please self-revert before another edit is made so that you are not sanctioned. Thanks. -- 880: 279:
2. Not having the needed documents, as for permission to live or work in a foreign country.
1000: 962: 821: 814: 786: 573: 485: 187:
Just a few things I want to mention: I argue for the use of "unauthorized immigrant" on
1234: 1208: 1182: 1081: 941: 741: 714: 686: 665: 635: 605:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of slogans and chants supporting immigration
437:
If you get the chance, please read through my reasoning and let me know if you concur.
285: 150:
is working on rating the quality of every military history article in Knowledge (XXG).
1056: 1048: 866: 859: 1112: 1033: 1019: 983: 925: 914: 904: 894: 884: 870: 840: 580: 518: 417: 393: 361: 344: 323: 292: 257: 233: 220: 206: 1122: 1101: 232:
talk page. If you could notify those people, that would be excellent. Thanks.
205:
Just some things to consider, and I look forward to a constructive discussion.--
579:
Some helpful Wikipedian subst-ed the template, so lets see if that fixes it.
408: 883:. However, I will make no further edits until a neutral editor comments. 139:
Interested in a particular area of military history? We have a number of
1032:
My friend, by the evidence here, you are definitely the misinformed one.
173: 1166:
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VIII - October 2006
1192:
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue IX - November 2006
1111:
prophecy that helps keep American politics static and reactionary...
794:
Allegations of state terrorism by United States of America/strawpolls
514: 229: 1218:
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue X - December 2006
1065:
WikiProject Military history Newsletter - Issue VII - September 2006
154:
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the
63: 783:
Talk:Overseas_expansion_of_the_United_States#Include_other_maps.3F
725:
Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue VI - August 2006
576:
look fine to me. BobFromBrockley seems to know what he's doing.
785:
I mentioned one of your comments (I think it was yours) on the
695:
Military history WikiProject coordinator election - vote phase!
459:
Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue IV - June 2006
619:
Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue V - July 2006
287:
I think I'll add the dictionary definitions to the proposal.
172: 62: 913:
I believe the Schreiber letter quotes Massad directly. --
761:
Allegations_of_state_terrorism_by_United_States_of_America
407:. I would like to as well, but the repeated addition of 198:
Thirdly, I have argued in other places (most recently on
320:
Thanks again! Hope we'll see some real discussion now!
757: 552: 265:
When I say "write a proposal" above, I mean "add a new
128:
Interested in working on a more complete article? The
352:
Oh, I see. You're the person who was vandalizing the
85:
points to most of the useful pages within the project.
1096:
I would like to encourage you to review the entry on
599:An article that you have been involved in editing, 400:. I'm not sure what bias I've eliminated, though. 601:List of slogans and chants supporting immigration 594:List of slogans and chants supporting immigration 683:Knowledge (XXG):Naming conventions (immigration) 182:Knowledge (XXG):Naming conventions (immigration) 881:WP:3RR#Reverting_potentially_libellous_material 109:; it will normally be delivered as a link, but 839:No problem. Good luck with other projects. 146:Want to know how good our articles are? The 8: 644:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history 77:A few features that you might find helpful: 58:Welcome to the Military history WikiProject! 778:You may be intersted in this map discussion 317:I'll comment on the proposal's page later. 820:I think I am going to unwatch myself from 763:, you are welcome to join us if you like. 267:Where compromises are not possible, use... 143:that focus on specific nations or periods. 572:Thanks for notifying me. The changes to 532:Can you take a second to look this over: 935:Thanks for your contributions on Khalidi 701:Military history WikiProject coordinator 652:Military history WikiProject coordinator 554:, and doesn't stay on your talk page. 1132:Benny Morris is no longer "left wing" 7: 136:departments would welcome your help! 865:I believe you have violated 3RR on 495:Thanks for the valuable lessen. :) 756:Thanks for adding back the quote: 24: 1233:This is an automated delivery by 1207:This is an automated delivery by 1181:This is an automated delivery by 1080:This is an automated delivery by 740:This is an automated delivery by 713:This is an automated delivery by 664:This is an automated delivery by 634:This is an automated delivery by 121:Starting some new articles? Our 528:Re:Talk:American_Empire#New_edit 792:Also you may be interested in: 125:outline some things to include. 1086:19:30, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1060:17:37, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 1037:23:24, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 1023:00:54, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 987:23:39, 22 September 2006 (UTC) 945:05:23, 21 September 2006 (UTC) 929:16:21, 21 September 2006 (UTC) 918:16:15, 21 September 2006 (UTC) 908:16:14, 21 September 2006 (UTC) 898:16:11, 21 September 2006 (UTC) 888:04:08, 21 September 2006 (UTC) 874:02:53, 21 September 2006 (UTC) 90:announcement and open task box 1: 1238:22:54, 26 December 2006 (UTC) 1212:22:14, 26 November 2006 (UTC) 844:22:41, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 834:03:50, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 808:06:34, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 773:02:42, 2 September 2006 (UTC) 534:Talk:American_Empire#New_edit 1186:22:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC) 130:military history peer review 123:article structure guidelines 72:Military history WikiProject 1126:05:13, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 1116:19:31, 2 October 2006 (UTC) 1105:18:09, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 746:12:19, 27 August 2006 (UTC) 719:11:49, 12 August 2006 (UTC) 189:Talk:Great American Boycott 34:Great job. I am impressed. 1254: 480:Learned something from you 379:Have a happy 4th of July. 690:18:33, 31 July 2006 (UTC) 670:18:47, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 614:17:37, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 584:23:01, 18 July 2006 (UTC) 564:17:09, 18 July 2006 (UTC) 546:16:55, 18 July 2006 (UTC) 475:05:48, 30 June 2006 (UTC) 365:22:45, 28 June 2006 (UTC) 348:22:23, 28 June 2006 (UTC) 327:21:31, 27 June 2006 (UTC) 296:00:55, 28 June 2006 (UTC) 261:19:39, 27 June 2006 (UTC) 237:19:30, 27 June 2006 (UTC) 224:19:28, 27 June 2006 (UTC) 210:19:15, 27 June 2006 (UTC) 163:13:45, 11 June 2006 (UTC) 39:20:20, 1 March 2006 (UTC) 522:04:13, 7 July 2006 (UTC) 508:07:28, 6 July 2006 (UTC) 448:00:54, 4 July 2006 (UTC) 421:17:48, 3 July 2006 (UTC) 387:04:35, 3 July 2006 (UTC) 354:Template:Anti-war topics 53:03:25, 17 May 2006 (UTC) 759:. I have moved on to: 414:Merry Christmas to you. 97:WPMILHIST Announcements 70:Hi, and welcome to the 646:Coordinator Elections! 398:conscientious objector 177: 67: 29:American empire (term) 1149:comment was added by 961:comment was added by 603:, has been listed at 492:much time building. 358:neutral point of view 176: 148:assessment department 111:several other formats 66: 27:Awesome job again on 1072:September 2006 issue 243:Operation Gatekeeper 156:project coordinators 1225:December 2006 issue 1199:November 2006 issue 1151:PalestineRemembered 247:euphemism treadmill 1173:October 2006 issue 339:V/R 160.149.13.69 200:User talk:Perspixx 178: 107:monthly newsletter 105:The project has a 68: 1240: 1214: 1188: 1162: 1088: 1013: 999:comment added by 974: 813:Going to unwatch 748: 732:August 2006 issue 721: 676:Naming immigrants 672: 639: 405:assume good faith 180:Wow, good job on 18:User talk:DKalkin 1245: 1232: 1206: 1180: 1144: 1079: 1049:en:User:cochese8 1012: 993: 956: 850:Samuel Moore UEL 739: 712: 663: 633: 592:AfD Nomination: 101: 95: 44:arab nationalism 1253: 1252: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1220: 1194: 1168: 1145:—The preceding 1134: 1094: 1067: 1045: 994: 957:—The preceding 953: 937: 863: 852: 822:American Empire 818: 815:American Empire 787:American Empire 780: 754: 727: 697: 678: 648: 626:July 2006 issue 621: 608: 597: 574:American Empire 530: 486:American Empire 482: 466:June 2006 issue 461: 334: 171: 166: 99: 93: 60: 46: 32: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1251: 1249: 1219: 1216: 1193: 1190: 1167: 1164: 1133: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1118: 1093: 1092:Review request 1090: 1066: 1063: 1044: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1026: 1025: 990: 989: 952: 949: 936: 933: 932: 931: 911: 910: 891: 890: 862: 856: 851: 848: 847: 846: 817: 811: 779: 776: 753: 750: 726: 723: 709:by August 26! 696: 693: 677: 674: 660:by August 11! 647: 641: 620: 617: 611:AdamBiswanger1 598: 596: 590: 589: 588: 587: 586: 577: 567: 566: 529: 526: 525: 524: 481: 478: 472:Kirill Lokshin 460: 457: 455: 452: 429: 426: 424: 423: 415: 412: 401: 396:right next to 370: 369: 368: 367: 333: 330: 307: 305: 303: 302: 301: 300: 299: 298: 288: 282: 281: 280: 277: 270: 253: 250: 226: 217: 170: 167: 160:Kirill Lokshin 152: 151: 144: 137: 126: 115: 114: 113:are available. 103: 86: 83:navigation box 61: 59: 56: 45: 42: 31: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1250: 1241: 1239: 1236: 1230: 1227: 1226: 1217: 1215: 1213: 1210: 1204: 1201: 1200: 1191: 1189: 1187: 1184: 1178: 1175: 1174: 1165: 1163: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1140: 1131: 1127: 1124: 1119: 1117: 1114: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1103: 1099: 1098:Michael Metti 1091: 1089: 1087: 1083: 1077: 1074: 1073: 1064: 1062: 1061: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1042: 1038: 1035: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1024: 1021: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1002: 998: 988: 985: 981: 977: 976: 975: 972: 968: 964: 960: 950: 948: 946: 943: 934: 930: 927: 922: 921: 920: 919: 916: 909: 906: 902: 901: 900: 899: 896: 889: 886: 882: 878: 877: 876: 875: 872: 868: 867:Joseph Massad 861: 860:Joseph Massad 857: 855: 849: 845: 842: 838: 837: 836: 835: 831: 827: 823: 816: 812: 810: 809: 805: 801: 796: 795: 790: 788: 784: 777: 775: 774: 770: 766: 762: 758: 751: 749: 747: 743: 737: 734: 733: 724: 722: 720: 716: 710: 708: 707: 702: 694: 692: 691: 688: 684: 675: 673: 671: 667: 661: 659: 658: 653: 645: 642: 640: 637: 631: 628: 627: 618: 616: 615: 612: 606: 602: 595: 591: 585: 582: 578: 575: 571: 570: 569: 568: 565: 561: 557: 553: 550: 549: 548: 547: 543: 539: 535: 527: 523: 520: 516: 512: 511: 510: 509: 505: 501: 496: 493: 489: 487: 479: 477: 476: 473: 468: 467: 458: 456: 453: 450: 449: 446: 445:72.135.23.153 441: 438: 435: 431: 427: 422: 419: 416: 413: 410: 406: 402: 399: 395: 391: 390: 389: 388: 385: 384:160.149.77.68 380: 377: 373: 366: 363: 359: 355: 351: 350: 349: 346: 342: 341: 340: 337: 331: 329: 328: 325: 321: 318: 315: 311: 306: 297: 294: 289: 286: 283: 278: 275: 274: 271: 268: 264: 263: 262: 259: 254: 251: 248: 244: 240: 239: 238: 235: 231: 227: 225: 222: 218: 214: 213: 212: 211: 208: 203: 201: 196: 192: 190: 185: 183: 175: 168: 165: 164: 161: 157: 149: 145: 142: 138: 135: 134:collaboration 131: 127: 124: 120: 119: 118: 112: 108: 104: 98: 91: 87: 84: 80: 79: 78: 75: 73: 65: 57: 55: 54: 51: 43: 41: 40: 37: 30: 26: 19: 1231: 1223: 1221: 1205: 1197: 1195: 1179: 1171: 1169: 1141: 1135: 1095: 1078: 1070: 1068: 1052: 1046: 1027: 991: 954: 938: 912: 892: 864: 853: 819: 797: 791: 781: 755: 738: 730: 728: 711: 705: 698: 679: 662: 657:sign up here 656: 649: 632: 624: 622: 609: 531: 497: 494: 490: 483: 464: 462: 454: 451: 442: 439: 436: 432: 428: 425: 394:draft dodger 381: 378: 374: 371: 338: 335: 322: 319: 316: 312: 308: 304: 266: 242: 204: 197: 193: 186: 179: 153: 116: 76: 69: 47: 33: 1043:Please help 995:—Preceding 947:Marwan1234 434:Schiemweb. 273:following: 141:task forces 1001:MagicKirin 963:MagicKirin 1235:grafikbot 1209:grafikbot 1183:grafikbot 1082:Grafikbot 942:Marwan123 742:grafikbot 715:grafikbot 706:vote here 687:TheKaplan 666:grafikbot 636:grafikbot 430:Dkalkin, 409:cowardice 372:Dkalkin, 1159:contribs 1147:unsigned 1057:Cochese8 1009:contribs 997:unsigned 971:contribs 959:unsigned 798:Signed: 536:Thanks. 498:Signed: 440:Thanks. 360:policy. 169:Proposal 980:WP:NPOV 858:3RR on 789:page. 324:RandomP 258:Rockero 207:Rockero 1123:Terjen 1113:Kalkin 1102:Terjen 1034:Kalkin 1020:Kalkin 984:Kalkin 951:ANSWER 926:Kalkin 905:Kalkin 885:Kalkin 841:Kalkin 752:Thanks 581:Kalkin 519:Kalkin 515:ANSWER 418:Kalkin 362:Kalkin 345:Kalkin 293:Kalkin 234:Kalkin 230:ANSWER 221:Kalkin 102:there. 1138:: --> 1137:: --> 1136:: --> 826:Travb 800:Travb 765:Travb 556:Travb 538:Travb 500:Travb 256:it.-- 249:here. 36:Travb 16:< 1222:The 1196:The 1170:The 1155:talk 1069:The 1053:keep 1005:talk 967:talk 830:talk 804:talk 769:talk 729:The 699:The 650:The 623:The 560:talk 542:talk 504:talk 463:The 443:V/R 382:V/R 132:and 88:The 81:Our 50:Arre 1161:) . 973:) . 915:Avi 895:Avi 871:Avi 744:-- 685:. 332:V/R 1157:• 1084:- 1011:) 1007:• 982:. 969:• 832:) 806:) 771:) 717:- 668:- 562:) 544:) 506:) 100:}} 94:{{ 1153:( 1003:( 965:( 828:( 802:( 767:( 638:. 558:( 540:( 502:(

Index

User talk:DKalkin
American empire (term)
Travb
20:20, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Arre
03:25, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject
navigation box
announcement and open task box
WPMILHIST Announcements
monthly newsletter
several other formats
article structure guidelines
military history peer review
collaboration
task forces
assessment department
project coordinators
Kirill Lokshin
13:45, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Knowledge (XXG):Naming conventions (immigration)
Talk:Great American Boycott
User talk:Perspixx
Rockero
19:15, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Kalkin
19:28, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
ANSWER

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.