User talk:DanielPharos - Knowledge (XXG)

729:

hardware and OS (for users and developers), as perceived stable (over time) 'base' for software. I think a good platform must fulfill all this. POSIX for linux is failing because it is incomplete (graphical, audio, input etc). LSB neither, it fails as platform for running software because the distribuitons differing still to much, various installation systems, and even when the same, installation packages are still required to be adapted and and hand-fitted for every specific distribution. but you are right i had win32 in mind, with directX as extension because it is downward compatible from 11 down to the very beginnings. speaking about directx as perceived platform "extension", this sure true until dx10 when, sadly, support for political reason was dropped from MS for 'legacy' Windows variants. directx 9.1c is available from win98 until windows 7 spanning a range of more then 10 years with hardware and software what is the reason why still many games coming in directx9 versions. i think this is forming base which can be truly called a platform. and yes, to have an stable base (for developers and users) which allows to access and utilize a modern PC systems COMPLETE power (audio, video, grpahic (3d! after 10years still a pain in linux), various input devices, GUI, network) is "big win for that system".

752:

would have to be revised? Surely you're joking! Nvidia didn't even produce decent Vista drivers until a year after its release; do you think they would then spent even more time making this Windows XP++ driver too? It just doesn't make any sense for Microsoft to put in the effort of back-porting the Vista driver model to XP. (Also, they usually don't backport major features of the new OS: they're NEW major features for a reason!) I can't run XP drivers on Windows 98, but you don't hear me complaining. DirectX 10 relies on the new driver model to work; features that can't be easily back-ported: see

1466:

briefly discusses the possibility of being very bold. Knowledge (XXG) states that pages should reflect consensus among editors, but does not state that consensus should be attained before edits can be made. Instead, it presents a model of how consensus can be obtained when an edit is not agreed to by other editors. Furthermore, Knowledge (XXG) states that nobody owns a page. This means that nobody can dictate the contents of a page in relation to other editors. Consequently, objecting to an edit on the sole ground that the edit is not based on consensus is not acceptable.

659:

interfaces directly, use at least one dynamic library implementing access to them (even if all what it does is forwarding). Here's the reason why: when the low level interface changes, you can adapt only the library without recompiling the application. Similarly, you don't have recompile libraries if something deep in the system changes. Generalizing, it's possible to achieve perfect compatibility this way. The only problem is that not every one uses available options smartly. That's why I was so strongly defending my opinion regarding this subject back at the talk page.

499: 2911: 2105: 979: 2819: 2731: 2586: 2498: 2410: 2335: 2262: 2189: 1910: 1609: 1184: 1117: 2160: 2068: 2037: 1725: 895: 627:. Of course, such massive changes require a bit of configuration to make applications consistent, but this is usually nothing more than a checkbox or maybe a drop-down list. I personally usually spend much more time exploring the options. If you want more specific information, there is vast amount of information in ubuntuforums.org and linuxquestions.org. 1203:

Article about a level editor for Quake. Of the two references supplied, one is inaccessible without paying a fee, so cannot be evaluated. The other is an academic paper that used Qoole, but only because it was the "cheapest of many Quake editors" - it almost goes out of its way to describe the editor

1149:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can

819:

tool to track down and fix unnecessarily red links in articles. Recently, the tool has been expanded to work on non-English Wikipedias. A small set of suggested fixes for red-links on the Dutch-language Knowledge (XXG) have been prepared and I'm hoping to interest some Dutch-language speakers (such

769:

Yes, that's exactly what I was aiming for. From an intuitive point of view, Windows (specifically, Win32) seems to be much closer to what a 'platform' should be than 'all of' Linux. That's why I'm asking if anybody has a decent defitinion of the word, so this can be made clear/can be settled, and out

658:

Considering compilation, if your applications involve playing with low level stuff or so, it's hard to maintain compatibility for such a long timeframe as decade. But it's possible. All what's needed is to use available options smartly. For example, always use dynamic linking. And never use low level

728:

hm, i agree the concept 'platform' was not clearly defined. but from intuitive understanding a good 'platform' is fitting all potential interpretations: as archtitecture, for running applications, as complete set (to contemporary standards) of functionallity and interfaces to the access the power of

695:

In conclusion: When you say Windows is a single platform, you're implicitly assuming a sole dependance on win32, and not .NET, DirectX, ... So when you DO make this distinction on the Linux side of the argument, it's unfair. One could only apply the 'platform'-term from an purely architectural point

168:

I'm just wondering .. as I'm a new member to the project, what ever happened to WP:Malware? It seems, 'dead' in some sort of sense. Malware is one of the only topics I specialize in, and I'd like to assist with getting it off the ground if possible? I'm really on a constricted schedule and seeing as

1782:

While I'm not really familiar with the subject, my impression was that the "Files and compiling" section was not strictly speaking off topic. All in all, I felt the article went beyond "a very basic description of the topic". Still, I'd see no problem whatsoever if you disagreed and reassessed the

991:

I am honored to present you The Barnstar of Diplomacy for your kind act of having done the extra mile of calling me on my talk page for dispute resolution as well as assuming good faith (or at least assuming the possibility of good faith) in me in face of other who discouraged you from doing both.

854:

for "promotional rubbish detected". Just to add some background, this is an oscar-winning software from the 1990s that was discontinued 12 years ago, so all the pictures are actually historical documents as opposed to promotional crap or spam. It's history on the level of the Mona Lisa, for sure,

674:

hmmm, sounds like it is complicated... with enough technical "smartness" you can achieve compatiblity with every kind of system. a good platform with respect to compatiblity is one were the programmers don't need to be too smart to achieve comaptiblity (inter-, downward and forward), because it is

1465:

I cannot refer you to a discussion that lead to consensus about my renovation of the WikiProject Computer Security‎ page on 29 August 2012. However, I did not need to have found any consensus among editors to have the right to edit the page. Knowledge (XXG) encourages editors to be bold, and also

1138:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be

777:

I'm actually starting to wonder if "platform" can't simply be defined as a multi-purpose framework? Something along the lines of: "A platform is an all-round framework, that allows the programmer/user to create a complete program solely depending on said framework." where "complete program" means

751:

I object to your "for political reason" in relation to DirectX 10. It probably did play a (not insignificant) role, but it's not the major reason. Windows XP support was already ment to be dropped by the time DirectX 10 was introduced, and you say the entire Windows XP (and/or lower) driver model

773:

I like your "fitting all potential interpretations", but I'm wondering if even Win32 really does that. I mean, you already explicitly included DirectX. What about WinSock? It's (strictly speaking) not part of Win32. Or the text-to-speach functionality Windows has? You'd have to select "Windows"

691:

So the 'definition' of platform is troubled. I guess 'dependancies' IS better. On Windows, you can depend on DirectX 10, .NET 3.5, win32 or even the specific way Windows 9x handles drivers, and on the Linux side Gnome, KDE, etc. So to call the various versions of Windows a single platform is

2201:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

477:

no. And even if those reports were "current" you haven't provided any sources for the rest of the unsourced text. The threshold for inclusion is verifiability not truth, and 4 year old bug reports that haven't been updated to reflect any current versions of the software don't support

2347:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2274:

774:

itself as the platform (maybe limiting it to desktop/server editions?). But then again, wouldn't Linux fit that description as well? Or certain distributions (like: Debian)? MS-DOS was considered a platform in its time: is it still one, or is "platform-ness" somehow time-dependant?

699:

I guess the only big difference is in the common denominator on these 'platforms': Windows has win32 (which is graphical), while Linux has POSIX (which is non-graphical). Calling that a "big win for Windows" in anything other than a sarcastic way, is silly to say the least.

1469:

I cannot refer you to the rule of the Knowledge (XXG) that states that the pages of a WikiProject should be stripped of all fancy stuff. As far as I know, the rule does not exist. However, editors are not required to retain any fancy stuff on the pages of a WikiProject.

223:

I've agreed with the other recommendation given for making it a task force. Hopefully this will turn out well .. I'm more than sure this will help centralize things between the two projects and make the overall system a lot easier for all of us. Kind Regards,

1922:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

2131:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

1151: 439:

One final word on it. It still reads like a resume and does not look like an even moderate-quality Knowledge (XXG) article. That would tend to detract from the value of the article. Take a look at the page on Bletchley Park cryptographer

140: 2704:

It's to make things consistent. The "programming language" entry of the infobox should mention the programming language, not the IDE. Even though right now the programming language page redirects to the software page, it didn't used to:

622:

You can always install KDE application on Gnome and the other way and it'll pull all required components automatically. It is also possible to exchange the entire desktop environment from Gnome to KDE or to have both, like

642:

Ah, awesome, I never knew that! Thanks. So that means on the GUI side, there isn't (necessarily) a 'platform-split'. Although Linux distributions lacking any GUI at all would still be a problem. (Also, see reply below.)

398:

Dan, does this dude really merit an article? Is he encyclopedic or just up and coming? I will accept your verdict, but if you agree he stays, they have to make the article look a little more presentable. Regards, the

2864: 2776: 2629: 2541: 2453: 2375: 2302: 2229: 1950: 2135:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

1818:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 2999:

I know you're on a break, but instead of asking for the deletion of a whole bunch of articles, maybe consider proposing merges? Anyway, I merged it, so the couple of reliable sources on this topic aren't lost.

57:

Knowledge (XXG) is not the place for this. Either add information (with proper references) to the article, or start a discussion on the talk-page. If you just want to vent, might I suggest getting a blog?

2128: 2848:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2760:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2613:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2525:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2437:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2359:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2286:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2213:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1934:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 189:

I think I might have made my message come on the wrong way. I was asking for assistance with the general production of the upgrade to the WikiProject, not for mentoring. I know how WP works. :)

692:

questionable; the same goes for Linux. It really depends on what your program actually needs; whether various versions are 'one platform' depends on your point of view, on your program's needs.

1868: 2833: 2745: 2599: 2511: 2423: 214:

Hi, I completely agree. Malware is a wide range of information .. and it is a devoted to field with Information Security. Leaving it out would be taking 1/4 out of the puzzle of security.

770:

of personal curiosity. A platform seems wider/broader than a framework (which is what SDL, DirectX, WinSock etc are), but a clear workable definition of the word seems to be missing.

2072: 2060: 2041: 2029: 120:

Hi Daniel, would you be interested in joining WikiProject: Malware? I've notice your recent work with us and I appreciate the work. I look forward to working with you.

1574: 1546: 1518: 828: 505: 498: 424:

are either written by him, or are about something he wrote. I would think that qualifies. (Especially as long as his work doesn't have any articles of its own.) --

247:! To better serve Knowledge (XXG), this project has been closed. We thank you for all of your hard work, and we would like to invite you to our new Wikiproject at 1458:

Can you refer me to the discussion where consensus was achieved for the recent changes that you made to the Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Computer Security‎ page?

2117: 1293: 1028: 1719: 675:

provided by the platform itself (e.g. by following (defacto)standards). and therefore these programmers can focus their effort on the application itself

248: 21:

Thanks Daniel for the change. My intent was to show the proof and I will follow your suggestion to put it as reference. Thanks again for the advice

2974: 1672: 1252: 1106: 2708:

So if the programming language page in the future is changed to redirect elsewhere, or become its own article, this link will already be correct. --

1771:

At least some refs to "establish verifiability". What this means - as I understand it - is that it should be easy to verify that the topic actually

2678:. I would like to ask for your reasoning since the new link redirects to a canonical page of the old link i.e. Delphi (programming language) -: --> 1486: 512: 870:

Ah, so the page is used as a dumping site for historical records. Hmm, okay, so maybe I tagged it wrong. Let me find the right template then. --

1858: 1289: 1024: 415: 2887: 2799: 2652: 2563: 2475: 2389: 2316: 2243: 1964: 1843: 827:. Each time you refresh the page you'll be presented with three new suggested fixes. I'll be happy to answer any questions on the tools 589:

The problem has returned to WP:Computer security. See talk page. The only way to actually "fix" the problem is a double transclusion. --

1044: 279: 42: 2045: 1461:

Can you refer me to the rule of the Knowledge (XXG) that states that the pages of a WikiProject should be stripped of all fancy stuff?

2978: 1676: 1490: 1256: 1333: 1040: 270:

Probably just its length, really. I can see where you're coming from about the content, though - that history section was a mess.

460: 1329: 1309: 244: 136: 2883: 2795: 2648: 2559: 2471: 2385: 2312: 2239: 1960: 1839: 923: 2857: 2769: 2622: 2534: 2446: 2368: 2295: 2222: 1943: 1286:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1021:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 806: 2966: 2922: 2900: 1664: 1620: 1598: 1305: 1244: 1195: 1173: 351:

is not supported anymore. It doesn't effect the templates since templates are now automatically nested if there are inside

1397: 1383: 1379: 2970: 1668: 1248: 2121: 1988:

useful and it has saved me countless hours of time already. Just wanted to let you know about it, maybe give it a try!

1830:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

1393:

I can see that you have previously edited these articles and any feedback on this matter would be greatly appreciated.

2869: 2781: 2634: 2546: 2458: 2380: 2307: 2234: 1955: 1854: 1835: 1694: 855:

but history none the less. Note also the difficulty to link to external references when the product is pre-internet.

1478: 1283: 1018: 2112: 2096: 1775:, i.e. that the article is not a hoax ("No Start-Class article should be in any danger of being speedily deleted.") 600: 577: 554: 530: 1981: 915: 256: 151: 125: 1155: 1387: 1368: 2845: 2757: 2610: 2522: 2434: 2356: 2283: 2210: 1980:

From your contribution history it seems to me you might be interested in this tool for WikiProject-assessing:

1931: 422: 275: 46: 2953: 2172: 2080: 1410: 448: 38: 2049: 1684: 1587: 1559: 1531: 1503: 1440: 999: 366: 2982: 1831: 1680: 1482: 1260: 1583: 1555: 1527: 1499: 1436: 2164: 2152: 2141: 1733: 1268: 1163: 1132: 851: 456: 404: 289: 252: 147: 121: 2827: 2739: 2593: 2505: 2417: 2343: 2270: 2197: 1918: 1900: 1807: 1798: 1633:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be

1474: 1875: 856: 836: 323: 2841: 2753: 2606: 2518: 2430: 2352: 2279: 2206: 1927: 1827: 1811: 1204:

as non-notable. I don't see (yet?) the breadth and depth of coverage needed to show that Qoole is

753: 730: 676: 2918: 2904: 2168: 2076: 2002: 1651: 1406: 930: 860: 803: 330: 271: 139:, and add your name to the participant list. Keep an eye out there and at our sister project, the 106: 82:, but I guess it is, especially since those other pages were tagged earlier. I readded the tag. 22: 1036: 444:

to compare and you'll see what I mean. Peace I am the Botendaddy 03:46, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

3001: 2949: 2709: 2013: 1885: 1788: 1690: 1647: 1357: 1227: 1091: 1080: 995: 960: 937: 871: 779: 734: 701: 680: 644: 483: 425: 377: 362: 308: 87: 59: 2853: 2765: 2618: 2530: 2442: 2364: 2291: 2218: 1939: 1823: 1815: 907: 903: 886: 237: 193: 169:

you made so many posts there .. I was wondering if you or some other editor could assist me?

2876: 2788: 2641: 2553: 2465: 719: 664: 632: 2936: 2856:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2849: 2768:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2761: 2621:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2614: 2533:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2526: 2445:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2438: 2367:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2360: 2294:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2287: 2221:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2214: 1942:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1935: 1826:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1819: 1762: 1634: 1214: 899: 810: 2687: 2137: 1728: 1264: 1159: 946: 452: 441: 400: 26: 1427:

I herewith acknowledge that I have read your addition to my Talk page of 29 August 2012.

1131:. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on 474: 79: 1872: 1213:

While all contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be

832: 696:

of view, but that has little to do with actually running applications on said platform.

596: 573: 550: 526: 303:

in the intro or categories, so I assumed it wasn't related. I added the template back.

225: 203: 176: 2935:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be

1205: 2986: 1992: 1616: 1602: 1348:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1071:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

418: 392: 355: 327: 102: 1127:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG) for multiple reasons. 978: 1784: 1783:

article back to stub, but in that case I'd advise adding appropriate cleanup tags.

1353: 1349: 1076: 1072: 956: 824: 479: 304: 83: 2818: 2730: 2585: 2497: 2409: 2334: 2261: 2188: 1909: 376:

Ah, OK! I actually was wondering why they were missing... :O Sorry about that. --

135:

Thats fine, we are glad to have any assistance. Just go to the Project page here:

815: 809:, I'd like to solicit your help in testing a new tool. For a few years now, the 778:"that's able to utilise most if not all of the available (hardware) features." -- 322:

This tag only belongs on talk pages, never on the actual article. I placed it on

2042:

Talk:Timeline of computer security hacker history#Really suitable for inclusion?

2030:

Talk:Timeline of computer security hacker history#Really suitable for inclusion?

715: 660: 628: 2699: 2683: 1231: 1141: 421:

podcast, I think. Also, most of the articles on the first few pages on Google

101:

Got it myself. Thanks for the heads up. Like to know when I've gone too fast.

1657:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

1237:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

1761:

bulleted prose items), which would have been enough to e.g. nominate it for

1573:

I have added a writing to the section "Renovation of the project's page" of

1545:

I have added a writing to the section "Renovation of the project's page" of

590: 567: 544: 520: 3009: 2993: 2891: 2803: 2717: 2691: 2656: 2567: 2479: 2393: 2320: 2247: 2176: 2145: 2084: 2053: 2021: 2006: 1968: 1893: 1878: 1847: 1792: 1737: 1701: 1591: 1563: 1535: 1507: 1444: 1430:

I plan to answer your writing with respect to content as soon as possible.

1414: 1361: 1272: 1167: 1099: 1084: 1003: 964: 879: 864: 840: 787: 738: 723: 709: 684: 668: 652: 636: 607: 584: 561: 537: 487: 433: 408: 385: 370: 333: 312: 283: 260: 228: 206: 179: 155: 129: 110: 91: 67: 50: 30: 2959:

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing

2012:

Thanks for the tip! I'll be sure to check it out; sounds useful indeed. --

2165:

Talk:Nival_(company)#Nival got hacked last year. Encyclopedic to include?

2153:

Talk:Nival_(company)#Nival got hacked last year. Encyclopedic to include?

2860:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2772:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2625:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2537:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2449:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2371:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2298:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2225:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1946:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1724: 2837:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2749:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2603:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2515:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2427:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1814:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

1715: 1708: 1325: 624: 1282:

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to

1017:

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to

543:

Found fix to the weird code error. Made some changes to main page. --

2073:

Talk:Timeline of computer security hacker history#Listcrufts removal

2061:

Talk:Timeline of computer security hacker history#Listcrufts removal

1063: 2129:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Comparison of bitcoin wallets

1301: 1191: 1177: 1124: 1110: 1059: 141:

WikiProject Computing/Computer and Information Security task force

898:

Hey there DanielPharos, thank you for your contributions! I am a

2873:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2785:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2638:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2550:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2462:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2863:

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

2831:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All

2775:

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

2743:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All

2628:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

2540:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

2452:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

2374:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

2301:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

2228:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

1949:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

1754:

Multiple sections of content, with a properly defined structure

2597:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

2509:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

1340: 1316: 1055: 1454:

In your message of 29 August 2012, you ask me two questions:

2909: 1607: 1182: 1115: 515:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

497: 1051: 2116:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

1867:

made me realise these categories should be merged - I've

951:

template, along with your question, beneath this message.

414:

I'd say yes, he's notable. His papers are pretty famous:

2421:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

1145:

to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for

2977:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

2844: