244:
are notale or not, it does not change the fact that her controversies has been the single most notable thing about her in the past months, and have been covered by reliable sources. Reliable sources decide whether something is controversial or not. Knowledge only reports on what reliable sources say. And this includes her opening a Parler account. If reliable sources report that Gina Carano stirred controversy by opening an account on the far right media platform Parler, then that is what wikipedia will report on. If you don't understand how the site rules work, and persist in removing content just because it casts your favorite actress in a bad light, then you are not here to build an encyclopedia, but to push YOUR OWN BIAS on others.
273:"Media sources saying that a Parler account is "controversial" does NOT mean we must take that as a fact and put it on here..." actually that is EXACTLY what we do, as long as those are considered reliable sources. "...because when we evaluate that..." we don't. We go by reliable sources. "...those sources are very clearly pushing a political agenda..." if that's what you believe, then find reliable sources that debunk it. It's that simple. You have failed to provide one argument to back your position. Everythjng you said here are your subjective feelings. That will not stand up to scrutiny.
259:
that a Parler account is "controversial" does NOT mean we must take that as a fact and put it on here, because when we evaluate that, those sources are very clearly pushing a political agenda and applying it to this scenario where this is nothing political or "controversial" about it. There were no "controversial" parler posts of her, and trying to say that simply having a Parler account is enough to be a "controversy" is EXTEREMELEY negatively biased.
732:
471:
415:
544:
698:
382:
659:
579:
296:
98:
243:
Knowledge goes by reliable sources. Not by youtube rumour mills, internet fanclubs or your personal feelings. The sections you keep persistently removing are all prolerly sourced, NPOV material. Regardless of whether you think Gina Carano is right or not, or whether this controversies surrounding her
222:
The way to make changes like the ones you want to is to persuade others that the changes are justified on the talk page. Given that you've had to restore your preferred version several times, evidently there isn't consensus that your edits are justified. If everyone who thought their edits were right
258:
Actually, that isn't even true. You cannot slap a statement like "She opened a Parler account" with NO context other than she just HAS on, and label it a "controversy," because then, you are applying a negative connotation under something that is in itself, nothing important. Media sources saying
203:
Actually, that's not that I am doing. What I'm doing is removing the parts of the section that blatantly do not belong there. There is no such thing as a "black lives matter" account, and Gina blocking
Twitter users does not make her racist, so putting it there is clearly meant to push a negative
177:
policies, and it would be best if, rather than continuing to discuss the material through edit summaries when you repeatedly remove the
Criticism section, you take your comments to the talk page. Removing the section over and over is not likely to get you the outcome you want, and it just ends up
204:
bias, and also having a Parler account itself is nothing "controversial" but putting it in that section gives the implication that it is something that is bad, especially as NO other context was given, so that is VERY clearly a negative bias and is not neutral in any way.
431:
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
173:, so I thought I'd reach out to you here. There's an ongoing and relatively active RfC on the talk page about whether to include the Criticism section, and if so how it should be included. Your actions right now seem to be in violation of the
460:
220:
An editor who repeatedly restores their preferred version is edit warring, regardless of whether those edits are justifiable. Claiming "My edits were right, so it wasn't edit warring" is not a valid defense.
178:
adding a bunch of friction to the discussion process. It's also a lot harder for other users to see the points you are making. It's really easy to add messages to the talk page, and please let me know on
515:
507:
500:
492:
488:
452:
445:
437:
433:
487:
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
702:
386:
101:
Welcome to
Knowledge, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a
590:; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to
307:; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to
26:
25:
748:
for persistent disruptive editing. You are still able to edit any other page. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
43:! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Knowledge and get help from experienced editors like
633:
350:
518:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
463:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
218:
I apologize if I wasn't clear in my original message, but it's edit-warring regardless of whether or not you're right. From the policy page:
624:
to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an
341:
to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an
749:
274:
245:
511:
456:
670:
629:
595:
346:
312:
109:, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the
105:
that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in
496:
441:
664:
639:
356:
102:
740:
73:
560:
278:
249:
706:
625:
583:
390:
342:
300:
137:
648:
568:
528:
701:
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
385:
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
765:
711:
677:
398:
366:
260:
205:
147:
110:
602:, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
599:
591:
319:, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
316:
308:
50:
179:
57:
40:
552:
121:
408:
Discretionary sanctions notice: biographies of living persons and post-1992 American politics
755:
644:
564:
524:
477:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.
421:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.
170:
731:
621:
394:
362:
338:
556:
470:
414:
224:
183:
174:
116:
543:
547:
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on
Knowledge, as you did to
745:
587:
548:
304:
163:
658:
768:
752:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:
720:
686:
652:
610:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
572:
532:
402:
370:
327:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
282:
268:
253:
238:
213:
197:
155:
140:
97:
555:. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
169:
Hello and welcome to
Knowledge! I'm not sure if you saw my messages on
223:
just edit-warred them into the article, we'd never get anything done.
106:
483:
imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
427:
imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
45:
620:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
337:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
68:
730:
559:. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your
705:
regarding a possible violation of
Knowledge's policy on
389:
regarding a possible violation of
Knowledge's policy on
551:, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
113:
to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
703:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring
615:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
387:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring
332:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
182:if you have any formatting/etiquette questions.
146:Thanks for letting me know about that. :) --
692:Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
376:Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
8:
17:DabYeetDab, you are invited to the Teahouse!
506:For additional information, please see the
491:is in effect. Any administrator may impose
451:For additional information, please see the
436:is in effect. Any administrator may impose
632:. In some cases, it may be appropriate to
586:according to the reverts you have made on
503:, when making edits related to the topic.
448:, when making edits related to the topic.
349:. In some cases, it may be appropriate to
303:according to the reverts you have made on
582:You currently appear to be engaged in an
299:You currently appear to be engaged in an
37:! Thanks for contributing to Knowledge.
495:on editors who do not strictly follow
440:on editors who do not strictly follow
219:
7:
636:. If you engage in an edit war, you
353:. If you engage in an edit war, you
508:guidance on discretionary sanctions
453:guidance on discretionary sanctions
14:
634:request temporary page protection
351:request temporary page protection
696:
657:
577:
542:
469:
413:
380:
294:
96:
24:
594:with others, to avoid editing
311:with others, to avoid editing
1:
769:19:44, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
721:18:26, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
687:18:16, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
653:18:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
573:17:09, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
533:16:52, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
162:Please, stop edit warring at
403:21:03, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
371:23:39, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
283:17:53, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
269:17:35, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
254:11:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
239:20:01, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
214:19:36, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
198:19:30, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
156:19:50, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
141:18:40, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
79:16:04, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
55:
785:
501:page-specific restrictions
446:page-specific restrictions
63:We hope to see you there!
22:
750:guide to appealing blocks
600:try to reach a consensus
317:try to reach a consensus
264:
209:
151:
667:without further warning
626:appropriate noticeboard
512:Arbitration Committee's
489:discretionary sanctions
457:Arbitration Committee's
434:discretionary sanctions
343:appropriate noticeboard
744:from editing the page
735:
760:Your reason here ~~~~
734:
563:for that. Thank you.
665:blocked from editing
497:Knowledge's policies
442:Knowledge's policies
736:
669:the next time you
630:dispute resolution
393:. Thank you. -
347:dispute resolution
58:Visit the Teahouse
766:Black Kite (talk)
86:
85:
80:
76:
72:on behalf of the
776:
763:
709:. Thank you.
700:
699:
661:
605:Points to note:
581:
580:
546:
473:
417:
384:
383:
322:Points to note:
298:
297:
236:
233:
230:
227:
195:
192:
189:
186:
171:Talk:Gina Carano
134:
131:
128:
125:
100:
78:
71:
65:
60:
48:
39:Be our guest at
28:
21:
20:
784:
783:
779:
778:
777:
775:
774:
773:
772:
771:
753:
728:
697:
694:
578:
540:
521:
520:
474:
466:
465:
418:
410:
381:
378:
295:
234:
231:
228:
225:
193:
190:
187:
184:
167:
132:
129:
126:
123:
103:Manual of Style
94:
82:
81:
67:
61:
56:
44:
19:
12:
11:
5:
782:
780:
738:You have been
737:
729:
727:
724:
693:
690:
618:
617:
612:
539:
536:
475:
468:
467:
419:
412:
411:
409:
406:
377:
374:
335:
334:
329:
292:
291:
290:
289:
288:
287:
286:
285:
241:
166:
160:
159:
158:
93:
90:
88:
84:
83:
74:Teahouse hosts
62:
38:
31:
29:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
781:
770:
767:
761:
757:
751:
747:
743:
742:
733:
726:February 2021
725:
723:
722:
719:
718:
717:
714:
708:
704:
691:
689:
688:
685:
684:
683:
680:
675:
672:
668:
666:
660:
655:
654:
650:
646:
643:
642:from editing.
641:
635:
631:
627:
623:
616:
613:
611:
608:
607:
606:
603:
601:
597:
593:
589:
585:
575:
574:
570:
566:
562:
558:
554:
550:
545:
538:February 2021
537:
535:
534:
530:
526:
519:
517:
513:
509:
504:
502:
498:
494:
490:
485:
484:
482:
472:
464:
462:
458:
454:
449:
447:
443:
439:
435:
429:
428:
426:
416:
407:
405:
404:
400:
396:
392:
388:
375:
373:
372:
368:
364:
360:
359:from editing.
358:
352:
348:
344:
340:
333:
330:
328:
325:
324:
323:
320:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
284:
280:
276:
275:46.97.170.253
272:
271:
270:
266:
262:
257:
256:
255:
251:
247:
246:46.97.170.253
242:
240:
237:
221:
217:
216:
215:
211:
207:
202:
201:
200:
199:
196:
181:
176:
172:
165:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
144:
143:
142:
139:
136:
135:
120:
118:
112:
108:
104:
99:
91:
89:
77:
75:
70:
66:Delivered by
59:
54:
52:
47:
42:
36:
30:
27:
23:
16:
759:
739:
715:
712:
710:
707:edit warring
695:
681:
678:
676:
674:
663:
656:
637:
619:
614:
609:
604:
596:disruptively
576:
553:edit summary
541:
522:
505:
486:
480:
478:
476:
450:
430:
424:
422:
420:
391:edit warring
379:
354:
336:
331:
326:
321:
313:disruptively
293:
180:my talk page
175:edit warring
168:
122:
119:specifically
115:Please read
114:
111:welcome page
95:
92:October 2020
87:
64:
41:the Teahouse
34:
32:
746:Gina Carano
673:Knowledge.
662:You may be
645:Sangdeboeuf
592:collaborate
588:Gina Carano
565:Sangdeboeuf
549:Gina Carano
525:Sangdeboeuf
309:collaborate
305:Gina Carano
164:Gina Carano
395:Adolphus79
363:Adolphus79
261:DabYeetDab
206:DabYeetDab
148:DabYeetDab
35:DabYeetDab
622:talk page
598:, and to
514:decision
499:, or the
493:sanctions
459:decision
444:, or the
438:sanctions
339:talk page
315:, and to
46:Cullen328
758:|reason=
713:Vaseline
679:Vaseline
628:or seek
584:edit war
557:reverted
510:and the
479:It does
455:and the
423:It does
345:or seek
301:edit war
756:unblock
741:blocked
716:eeeeeee
682:eeeeeee
671:disrupt
640:blocked
638:may be
561:sandbox
357:blocked
355:may be
69:HostBot
138:(talk)
117:WP:LQ
107:Korra
649:talk
569:talk
529:talk
516:here
461:here
399:talk
367:talk
279:talk
265:talk
250:talk
210:talk
152:talk
51:talk
764:.
481:not
425:not
133:Fir
130:een
127:rgr
124:Eve
53:).
33:Hi
762:}}
754:{{
651:)
571:)
531:)
401:)
369:)
361:-
281:)
267:)
252:)
235:os
232:Sr
229:ey
226:Sr
212:)
194:os
191:Sr
188:ey
185:Sr
154:)
647:(
567:(
527:(
523:—
397:(
365:(
277:(
263:(
248:(
208:(
150:(
49:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
