17:
24:
35:
69:
373:
774:
653:. Apologies if I perceived a patronizing tone where none was actually meant. As for the differences between policy and guideline on Knowledge (XXG), and my lack of understanding of them explaining to what extent I would not understand notability criteria, I will not comment upon that statement of yours; but you will note that you still failed to show me one single Prod/Afd by me that was clearly wrong.
681:
time to examine each user personally who got a deletion tag wrong. Sorry if you got caught in the net - it happens. Nobody is forcing you to to stick around and chase vandals it's just another area where some help is needed. BTW, you might like to have another look at an article you created. I've edited out some content that didn't belong there but I didn't check the history to see who inserted it.
167:
468:
not sure you were addressing me. (There are very easy ways to notify the right users about the right page with greetings included, through
Twinkle, for your information). Anyway I incidentally consulted the right page and I deprodded it. Elder (1990) is notable in the field of contemporary art. Have a good day-
589:(in April 2017). Feel free to explain your thoughts to that user if your idea is he did something very wrong. I would rather thank him but it's up to you. Anyway, thank you for your message, although I disagree with part of its content and its slightly patronizing tone, to be completely honest with you.
467:
Lauren Elder nor did you mention you had prodded the page (You could have opened a new section, as the comparison with Lana
Zakocela (or with her page) is, how shall say? not very obvious...), ...I had checked the page about the Lauren Elder you provided the link of (sole survivor, born 1947) and was
231:
I replied on the article's talk page. Megan Rain has received at least one significant award since the debate in
February. So that above referred to G4 criterium does not apply here. I cannot say if the overall content of the page deleted was different in all aspects but this at least has changed and
680:
The first post I made in this thread is a boilerplate I conceived and use but the heuristics we use here are a
Knowledge (XXG) tactic. I have to chase away up to 30 users a day from messing with NPP and with an enormous backlog of 22,000 totally rubbish articles, it's no joyride and doesn't leave
200:
and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion
624:
about vandalism which is generally considered to be the first stepping stone for those who are determined to make a
Wikicareer in the maintenance areas rather than contribute new content. There is nothing patronising at all in being frank and telling you that and asking you politely not to do
786:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before
Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
661:
deal with vandalism issues on
Knowledge (XXG)), nor did I ever express or conceive any doubt that you are an experienced and trusted user here. If I gave you any impression that I had, I am sorry but that was not my intent. Thank you for taking the time to explain your views. Greetings.
757:
I generally do NOT edit the same pages with my two accounts. In fact, I hope I never did and my intention was to keep Art with this account and Other with GB, but I got mixed up and then I was wrongly blocked for a loooong while on the Fr. WP. Not that this might interest anybody
619:
The fact that you do not understand the difference between 'policy' and 'guideline' and therefore are not versed in our notability criteria, clearly demonstrate that you do not (yet) have sufficient experience fot this kind of work; with 200 edits you'll first qualify to
711:
You mean you wrote your first message without checking if I had done anything that might be wrong? (Again, I never edited/reviewed NPP, as far as I know, except pages I created, obviously). Your message was just a reminder of
Knowledge (XXG) Netiquette, then? Ok, sure.
656:
For the rest, your conception of heuristic on
Knowledge (XXG) and what steps it should involve and in what order preferably, is yours, I will not try to convince you otherwise (however, I am not interested in vandalism, sorry, allow me to repeat myself and I will
189:. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
399:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
601:; if the fact of addressing those concerns by relatively recent (more than one year) users is not allowed, I was not aware of that and still cannot believe this forbidding appears anywhere in general guidelines. Happy editing to you too,
584:
but it is not what the official policy says (WP:Notability_(high_schools), as I am sure you know) firstly, and secondly, I only afded it - not ProdDed, mind you, precisely because I KNEW that policy -, because it had been tagged
596:
enlist in CVUA, sorry, not interested. I was just trying to address issues on articles with topics of uncertain notability that had already been tagged. If current policies on this
Knowledge (XXG) do not allow such tagging,
814:
629:
is governed by community consensus (which I actively help to craft) - which I simply implement and have been doing as an admisn for a very long time and as a user for even longer. Thank you for your comprehension.
525:
to learn all about vandalism and what to do about it. It's a much easier task and still extremely important. If you have any questions don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Happy editing!
403:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
263:
does not seem to be significant - the page literally says that the awards show takes place in someone's living room. If you can find a source discussing the award and showing that it is significant, let me know.
205:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request
530:
575:
More seriously, while I may understand your general concern, I am surprised to read a sentence such as "Please refrain from patrolling pages and tagging them for maintenance or deletion until you have
499:, as it was prodded in 2009 and contested, which makes it permanently ineligible for further prods. I only did this for procedural reasons; if you still wish to pursue deletion I wouldn't oppose an AfD. —
798:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
580:
more experience" ... !!! as if ANY of my ProD/Afd/comments had been completely out of place. If the case is the Lycée René Cassin, well, I understand it belongs to a sanctuarized category
517:
Hi. We appreciate your enthusiasm but maintenance tasks are not for beginners. Please refrain from patrolling pages and tagging them for maintenance or deletion until you have
396:
334:, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the
719:, if that was the page you had in mind. Thank you for editing the page. Not sure I understand what you're asking me precisely, though. The Twitter/Instagram
385:
81:
156:
16:
431:
given there are no museum collections or major art reviews which are listed as needed; the article has no other convincing signs beyond it.
828:
287:
Too bad. Thank you for the message, anyway. I think that award as Next Porn Superstar is significant, be it only because it is listed on
345:
186:
147:
824:
807:
23:
291:
together with XBIZ and AVN awards, and reflects (as was the case here) undeniable notoriety on the Internet. Greetings,--
202:
182:
496:
489:
389:
819:
537:
is a high school and it's graduation has an even higher academic level than US or UK high schools. They are
415:
444:
795:
255:
Hey there! I just wanted to explain why I deleted the Megan Rain page, despite the new award she received.
405:
91:
721:
might have been me, at a time when I saw that other pages had them (but things have changed, apparently).
260:
724:
269:
782:
256:
458:
432:
791:
428:
310:
131:
731:, was me, but if it was a spam, you did well to remove it and thank you. Once again, greetings,
197:
174:
160:
103:
686:
635:
546:
214:
181:, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a
87:
803:
522:
206:
49:
521:
more experience. When you have 200 mainspace edits you will qualify to enroll at the
353:
125:
806:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
799:
592:
For your complete information, I don't review NPP, never (to my knowledge) did, and I will
178:
34:
501:
282:
265:
115:
177:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under
331:
314:
832:
744:
690:
675:
639:
614:
550:
507:
481:
449:
417:
357:
303:
273:
244:
218:
95:
68:
380:
364:
338:
324:
259:
has a criteria for receiving a "well-known and significant" industry award, but the
706:
682:
648:
631:
559:
542:
424:
226:
210:
773:
716:
349:
201:
tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
625:
something that you are getting wrong. Also, I do not make up the rules here -
80:
Hello, Darthbunk Pakt Dunft, and welcome to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for
810:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
192:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may
572:
account; +2, and I'll be qualified according to your standards, then.
67:
15:
531:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Lycée René Cassin (Gonesse)
344:
template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at
288:
813:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
29:
165:
99:
727:, I had forgotten that) (i.e. its creation). The other one
384:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to
564:, If I am correct, I have 198 edits in the mainspace on
794:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
463:-Likewise hello. Nota: You did not notify me about the
378:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
723:wasn't me. I have only one edit on the page (as my
397:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Lana Zakocela
84:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
179:section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion
8:
121:
780:Hello, Darthbunk Pakt Dunft. Voting in the
386:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
203:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
22:
750:
599:I am not the one you wanted to talk to
346:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
783:2017 Arbitration Committee elections
111:
796:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
767:ArbCom 2017 election voter message
497:9/11 Memorial Project – California
490:9/11 Memorial Project – California
14:
395:The article will be discussed at
772:
371:
33:
817:and submit your choices on the
423:Similar with another article,
1:
304:22:58, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
274:22:21, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
245:21:00, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
219:20:28, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
96:14:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
833:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
427:has no signs of satisfying
358:10:32, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
850:
825:MediaWiki message delivery
418:17:25, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
173:A tag has been placed on
146:
122:
102:
62:talk page, then ping you.
745:16:15, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
691:15:39, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
676:15:20, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
640:14:17, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
615:14:02, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
551:12:10, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
508:21:58, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
495:Hello, I have deprodded
388:or whether it should be
232:it changes everything.--
482:22:00, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
450:00:45, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
194:contest the nomination
170:
123:Cet utilisateur parle
72:
27:
20:
792:Arbitration Committee
568:Knowledge (XXG) with
187:articles for deletion
169:
148:Search user languages
104:Knowledge (XXG):Babel
71:
56:you left me a message
26:
19:
42:I left you a message
320:I have removed the
261:award Rain received
44:, please answer on
808:arbitration policy
715:I checked rapidly
171:
82:your contributions
73:
28:
21:
729:, not sure at all
198:visiting the page
153:
152:
141:
140:
66:
65:
58:, I'll answer on
841:
776:
759:
755:
738:
710:
669:
652:
608:
587:by another user
582:according to you
563:
506:
475:
462:
447:
442:
412:
409:
375:
374:
343:
337:
329:
323:
297:
294:
286:
238:
235:
230:
168:
137:
136:
112:
100:
48:talk page, then
37:
30:
849:
848:
844:
843:
842:
840:
839:
838:
837:
836:
777:
769:
763:
762:
756:
752:
736:
704:
683:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง
667:
646:
632:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง
606:
557:
543:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง
515:
500:
493:
473:
456:
445:
433:
410:
407:
376:
372:
369:
341:
335:
327:
321:
318:
295:
292:
280:
253:
236:
233:
224:
183:deletion debate
166:
164:
157:Speedy deletion
142:
78:
12:
11:
5:
847:
845:
815:the candidates
778:
771:
770:
768:
765:
764:
761:
760:
749:
748:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
697:
696:
695:
694:
693:
654:
590:
573:
514:
511:
492:
486:
485:
484:
459:SwisterTwister
453:
452:
370:
368:
363:Nomination of
361:
332:LightningPaint
317:
315:LightningPaint
308:
307:
306:
252:
249:
248:
247:
163:
159:nomination of
154:
151:
150:
144:
143:
139:
138:
119:
110:
107:
106:
77:
74:
64:
63:
53:
38:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
846:
835:
834:
830:
826:
822:
821:
816:
811:
809:
805:
801:
797:
793:
788:
785:
784:
775:
766:
754:
751:
747:
746:
743:
742:
734:
730:
726:
722:
718:
713:
708:
692:
688:
684:
679:
678:
677:
674:
673:
665:
660:
655:
650:
645:
644:
643:
642:
641:
637:
633:
628:
623:
618:
617:
616:
613:
612:
604:
600:
595:
591:
588:
583:
579:
578:significantly
574:
571:
567:
561:
555:
554:
553:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
532:
527:
524:
520:
519:significantly
512:
510:
509:
505:
504:
498:
491:
487:
483:
480:
479:
471:
466:
460:
455:
454:
451:
448:
443:
440:
436:
430:
426:
422:
421:
420:
419:
416:
414:
413:
401:
398:
393:
391:
387:
383:
382:
381:Lana Zakocela
366:
365:Lana Zakocela
362:
360:
359:
355:
351:
347:
340:
333:
326:
316:
312:
309:
305:
301:
290:
284:
278:
277:
276:
275:
271:
267:
262:
258:
250:
246:
242:
228:
223:
222:
221:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
199:
195:
190:
188:
185:, such as at
184:
180:
176:
162:
158:
155:
149:
145:
134:
133:
132:professionnel
128:
127:
120:
117:
114:
113:
109:
108:
105:
101:
98:
97:
93:
89:
85:
83:
75:
70:
61:
57:
51:
47:
43:
39:
36:
32:
31:
25:
18:
818:
812:
789:
781:
779:
753:
740:
739:
732:
728:
725:Doppelgänger
720:
714:
703:
671:
670:
663:
658:
626:
621:
610:
609:
602:
598:
593:
586:
581:
577:
569:
565:
538:
534:
528:
518:
516:
502:
494:
477:
476:
469:
464:
438:
434:
425:Lauren Elder
406:
402:
394:
379:
377:
367:for deletion
319:
299:
254:
240:
193:
191:
172:
130:
129:à un niveau
124:
88:NeemNarduni2
86:
79:
59:
55:
45:
41:
820:voting page
717:Luma Grothe
533:, a French
408:Programming
348:. Thanks!
804:topic bans
627:everything
529:PS. FWIW,
503:KuyaBriBri
311:Deprodding
283:Cerebellum
266:Cerebellum
257:WP:PORNBIO
251:Megan Rain
175:Megan Rain
161:Megan Rain
800:site bans
737:pakt dunf
735:arthbunk
668:pakt dunf
666:arthbunk
607:pakt dunf
605:arthbunk
541:notable.
474:pakt dunf
429:WP:ARTIST
330:tag from
211:• Gene93k
488:Deprod:
472:arthbunk
126:français
76:Welcome!
707:Kudpung
649:Kudpung
560:Kudpung
523:WP:CVUA
390:deleted
296:PKT DFT
237:PKT DFT
227:Gene93k
441:wister
437:wister
350:Pavlor
622:learn
535:lycée
465:right
279:Hello
52:me.
829:talk
790:The
758:now.
687:talk
636:talk
570:this
566:this
547:talk
446:talk
411:Geek
354:talk
339:prod
325:prod
289:iafd
270:talk
215:talk
209:.
207:here
92:talk
50:ping
46:your
659:not
594:not
539:all
513:NPP
313:of
293:DBK
234:DBK
196:by
54:If
40:If
831:)
823:.
802:,
689:)
638:)
556:Hi
549:)
392:.
356:)
342:}}
336:{{
328:}}
322:{{
302:)
272:)
264:--
243:)
217:)
118:-5
116:fr
94:)
60:my
827:(
741:t
733:d
709::
705:@
685:(
672:t
664:d
651::
647:@
634:(
611:t
603:d
562::
558:@
545:(
478:T
470:d
461::
457:@
439:T
435:S
352:(
300:t
298:(
285::
281:@
268:(
241:t
239:(
229::
225:@
213:(
135:.
90:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
