User talk:David.moreno72/Archive 13

1669:. This is normally established by referencing at least 3 independent, reliable sources. Reference 1 - not applicable. Reference 2 3 and 4 - These satisfy the independent and reliable clause, but they essentially report on the same story, and so can be considered as a single source. There other issues that I have noted. For instance, there is a claim that it is powered by 'Google Custom Search, with minor refinements'. Where is the reference to support this? Or the claim 'It's first three results are of a easy reading level for a kid.' Where is the reference to support this? Or 'Kiddle's main competitor is kidzsearch.com, and both are used by millions.'. The reference supplied does not verify the claim, so where is the reference to support this? Also, the general tone of the article needs to be cleaned up. I hope this has helped. Thank you 1595:

contributing to main article or story was to build it up and provide the audience an in depth view...I feel that my rejected article contribution was not what I would expect under the circumstances to shed some sort of "fun facts" especially if it's related...and no one else would know about the back story because I was present at the beginning. Was there another method or process I should have been focusing on??? Should I have created a primary page for the article I was contributing? This is all new to me, so any info would help.

1117: 2275:

groups from Switzerland, that is why it seems that everytime I like to add some information to the the history of the dive watch they get deleted, although I try to support my edits by patent documents. Do you see the point? I am trying to bring real history to the shine but the shadows of the big marketing guys seem to be able to stop the truth from surfacing on wikipedia. I really wish you can do some deep reasearch before editing and deleting, best regards, P.S.

3682: 3463: 3181: 2664: 659: 3622: 31: 4076: 2987: 2628: 1411: 1372: 1333: 1797:, there should be at least 3 independent, reliable sources than have SIGNIFICANT coverage about the topic, which in this case, is the cartoon, not the author. There needs to be at least 3 independent, reliable sources that have significant coverage about the cartoon, or a major award that has been awarded to the cartoon, not the author. For instance, here is an award that has been given to the cartoon Bizarro 835: 762: 632: 284: 587:

as Knowledge (XXG) is very helpful in recognizing and encouraging new as well as successful talents. I have made sure that this looks more like a Knowledge (XXG) article rather than looking like a self-advertising page as what you had stated.I would request you to give thsi article a chance and do he needfull. in case you feel anymore correction I would be more th3 happy to do so.

1563: 2247: 3140: 3115:. You said me that it's refer to 'Pixel-art scaling algorithms', but my article is about rotating pixel art, not about scaling. The suggested algorithm doesn't change image size (though it uses upscaling and downscaling as middle steps). Are you sure it can't be published as a separate article? Thanks for reviewing and good luck! 3981:

Regarding the article, 'Yemi Morafa', which you deleted on the 15th of September, I've some changes based on your requests. I've removed the IMDB links. I've also removed some YouTube links. However, with the other YouTube videos, these are samples of the subject's work. He is listed as 'Director' on

3800:

Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it

2274:

Hi David, I am a marine biologist from Italy, I have been researching diving instruments and especially dive watches for 18 years, I find most of the entries realted to dive watches are marketing driven, in fact all the real beauty of this genre is burried between marketing lines of the 3 major watch

2067:

Since you reviewed and rejected by drafts for both Buni and its author Ryan Pagelow I am a bit confused here. When I submitted the draft for the comic you mentioned the award was given to the author which would help establish notability and not the comic. so I created the article about the author and

1915:

1275:

At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP

4153:

User "ToBeCloud" replied me in IRC channel "Other Wikipedias sometimes have lower criteria for inclusion, and/or a less active community to find unsuitable articles and nominate them for deletion The only solution here sadly is to change the target of efforts to areas that are actually useful to the

3498:

for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and

1764:

Can you please review the user's nosebagbear comments below and on the page regarding web notability for my submission? The author was awarded a ruben award by national cartoonist society. Can you please provide input as to why this can't pass notability and what else I can do to get this published?

1705:

Hello, I hope after the initial rejection we can be friends. I'd really like to continue the page I'm editing. Lots of hard work is happening, they don't have very much money, they study to be a medical professional. They were hacked and had lots of their online life lost. They still work very hard.

2895:

Could you please help me to revise my page again. There is still a lot of content missing, but I think that in one year we could make this page notable enough. Plagiarism is a serious crime, and I am concerned with it, as I have many things published online, including academic content. I am part of

586:

As per your feedback, I had made enough research about my friend Ram Manjjonaath who is an upcoming cine actor/stage artiste/ IT, consultant. He is having enough limelight in the Kannada cine industry and is on the path of success. I would be very much honored if you could move the draft to article

536:

I did not submit User:BrendonTheWizard/Dolly (soft drink). Why did you add a "submission declined" template? It was unsubmitted, marked as a draft, and had an alert at the top saying it was being translated. It was a userspace work in progress never put in draftspace or submitted for review. Please

490:

Wired.com (both online and in paper form, alexa rank ~450 in the US ) is a published, reliable and secondary source, and offered significant coverage of the company independent of the subject i.e. independent of Checkbook.io, unrelated to any press releases or communication efforts of Checkbook.io

2219:

I am interested to get some more information why the Ology Bioservices page was rejected... is it because it's a stub, because it's too similar to the Nanotherapeutics page (pages should be combined), because it doesn't have any references, or just because it doesn't have sufficient interest yet?

1665:. I have not deleted the article. The acceptance of an article is not dependent on the existence of other articles. If you think that the blackle.com page is not notable, you are welcome to nominate it for deletion. In regards to the article you submitted, the main requirement is that is must pass 1631:

Dear David.moreno72, I'm a kid, and I wanted to make an article. You rejected it. Why? It is reliable (bbc) and you have no right to delete it. The page blackle.com is a website that is less popular than kiddle.co, and yet that was not removed? Please re consider your review. I am new to wikipedia

3477:

More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not

3427:

I am in the process of constructing a page Ken Davis Music - about the artist and the music. Perhaps I was premature in submitting the page however you rejected it on the basis of not being noteworthy enough for Knowledge (XXG). I wonder if you'd be kind enough to explain. Also, the conflict of

3428:

interest is not appropriate. I have Known Ken as a fan since his performances in the early 1980s. Because of my experience in online product development (my company developed YesBoookit now part of Expedia) he has engaged my to assist with a Knowledge (XXG) page for him. Thanks, Regards Kevin

1594:

I recently tried (for the first time) to contribute to a Knowledge (XXG) page and found the reason for not being able to provide cross referencing...how is this possible if the article I am writing is the first one to start the potential for a cross referencing??? I thought the whole point to

3549:

Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for

3396:

You had rejected my submission stating it is not important to be included in wiki. To justify my part, G D Vashist is the world’s only Astro- Scientist who combines science with astrology. He spent a lifetime researching in perfecting astrology, correcting its current flaws and come to apt

3511:

The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.

847:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

774:

2386:

Solving an open problem for 35 years posed 3 times by 1 of the most prominent living probabilists (Rick Durrett) is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG)? Can you please elaborate on your criteria and motives for censoring an honest fan of mathematics?

3740:

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.

1291:

Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minutevideo was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments

4196:

Please note that ALL, I repeat ALL, of the companies are notable, that is, they already have a Knowledge (XXG) article about them. Please also note that there are NO URL's. If you wish to have your article created it MUST follow Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines. Thank you

1878:

I have added a number of links which show that he has acted as a singer in many films, which is mentioned in the film Knowledge (XXG) page with the name. I also enclosed the Imdb link in which all the singer data is present. You will reconsider this and publish it

1237: 3540:

and have no intention of returning to Knowledge (XXG). Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.

3815:

makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.

2193:. If could resubmit and make the same comments as you did here, I'm sure it will be accepted. In the meantime, if there are any other news items or reliable references that can add to the bio, that would make the chances of acceptance even higher. Thank you 2164:, namely criteria 1 and criteria 3. Criteria 1: He is one of the most cited scientists in his field (please check the referenced google scholar citation page and note that as of now he has been cited more than 21000 times). Criteria 3: He is a fellow of the 2041:. If could resubmit and make the same comments as you did here, I'm sure it will be accepted. In the meantime, if there are any other news items or reliable references that can add to the bio, that would make the chances of acceptance even higher. Thank you 2012:, namely criteria 1 and criteria 3. Criteria 1: He is one of the most cited scientists in his field (please check the referenced google scholar citation page and note that as of now he has been cited more than 21000 times). Criteria 3: He is a fellow of the 2072:

and I was planning on creating the link to his name from that article to this article. I am really confused here as he is already mentioned in multiple articles on Knowledge (XXG) already. how is that not notable/significant to create the contribution?

1920:

687: 671: 351:

are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to

498:

Digital Transactions is a published, reliable and secondary source, and offered significant coverage of the company independent of the subject i.e. independent of Checkbook.io, unrelated to any press releases or communication efforts of Checkbook.io

514:

Accounting Today is a published, reliable and secondary source, and offered significant coverage of the company independent of the subject i.e. independent of Checkbook.io, unrelated to any press releases or communication efforts of Checkbook.io

506:

American Genius is a published, reliable and secondary source, and offered significant coverage of the company independent of the subject i.e. independent of Checkbook.io, unrelated to any press releases or communication efforts of Checkbook.io

3233:

across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the

1264:, and still rising. There are around 640holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break. 2491:

easily satisfies criteria 2, having been awarded the Fields Medal (although he declined it) and the Millennium Prize. If you are able to demonstrate, by independent reliable sources, that Tzioufas is able to satisfy any of the criteria in

4126:"One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, per the above guidelines; notable list topics are appropriate for a stand-alone list." (WP:LISTN). 1244: 2445:

Is it compulsory according to you that all people have a wiki page are fellows of the American Mathematical Society, or other societies, or they have received a medal of sorts? that is interesting since that would exclude for example

3397:

predictions. People believe in him and come to him for life advice. Finally, he is an influencer and does good for society as well by providing jobs and financial aid for the needy. Kindly consider all this and approve my article.

1793:. The award (NCS Division Award) was for the author, not the cartoon. If the article was about the author, then it would help in establishing notability, but the article isn't about the author, so it doesn't apply. To satisfy 359:

to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the

2950:

Dear David.moreno72 Thank you for the review. As it is declined I want to share few reasons why it is still has scope for publication. Even if you think it has no scope please share the ways to improve at "sequence" article.

3776:

is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the

3700:

as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

1135:. Around on Knowledge (XXG) since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285edits, one of Knowledge (XXG)'s most prolific users. 706:

We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Knowledge (XXG) that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other

2762: 2436:

met in contrast to the article I authored for Prof Tzioufas? Please note that there are 3 external links in the debated article and exact references. In particular you may wish to receive advise from the page of the

1054:

I’ve tried to read up on the guidelines, but I’m still not sure the reason it was rejected. Since your decision, I have tried my best to update the article with relevant information and references that I could find.

875: 802: 2816:. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them. 1819:

Thanks David. Question, if I change the article to be about the author and list his book and award and include a section to describe the comic would that be acceptable or is there anything else missing? Thank you

3524:, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which 3499:

sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at

142:

Six Riders of higher density, high velocity systems may enjoy a beverage, partake in a multimedia event, read the paper, participate in conversation, work with an electronic device or view the scenery in

2168:, as noted in the reference document from the AIMBE website. Scientists with far less scholarly merit have their page approved so I'm surprised this keeps getting rejected. Even his PhD student has a page! 2103:. Yes that is one reference that helps, but to satisfy WP:GNG, there should be at least 3 independent, reliable sources than have SIGNIFICANT coverage about the topic, that is several paragraphs. Thank you 2016:, as noted in the reference document from the AIMBE website. Scientists with far less scholarly merit have their page approved so I'm surprised this keeps getting rejected. Even his PhD student has a page! 1951:. Yes that is one reference that helps, but to satisfy WP:GNG, there should be at least 3 independent, reliable sources than have SIGNIFICANT coverage about the topic, that is several paragraphs. Thank you 219:

Thanks for your prompt attention David. Even though my proposed page didn't meet Knowledge (XXG)'s QA standards, I appreciate your time. I now know a lot more about Knowledge (XXG) than I did a week ago...

3732:, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading. 859:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 786:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 713: 1242: 1239: 1238: 1243: 2165: 2013: 2752: 2732: 2724: 2361:

of the subject. A single mention, or one sentence is simply not enough. Only once you are unable to demonstrate notability, then it will have a good chance of being accepted. Thank you.

3294: 1532:

I have checked Knowledge (XXG) tutorials and templates and I have updated my first page that was declined and I hope you will re-check it after the update and consider publishing it.

3833: 3591: 3333: 2873: 1302: 1230: 733: 389: 3791:. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it. 3536:

Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are

3205: 3029:

tale knows that a British child "stamps" their foot. They also changed the (British) term "small girl" into the (American style) "little girl". There made need to be intervention?

1771:

Symbol opinion vote.svg Comment: TO OTHER REVIEWERS: I suspect that this draft may presumptively pass Web notability by criterion 2, due to the National Cartoonists' Reuben award.

108: 3656:

A few months ago I made an article that was rejected, I received some comments from you about how to correct it to be approved, but I have not received any response since then.

3155: 2835:– automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar. 1774:

This would need to be supported/demonstrated by a secondary source, but would avoid the whole "multiple reviews" etc, aspect. Nosebagbear (talk) 21:14, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

3787:

A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with

1241: 701:

If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.

3569:

Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at

3566:

School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.

2954:

1. The subject not exist in Knowledge (XXG) at "Sequence" also except few mentions like "Defining a sequence by recursion" there are no mentions about sequences I sent

2068:

noted the award, how is it decided that its not significant? please note that Ryan Pagelow is already mentioned on other Knowledge (XXG) articles noting webcomic awards

1916:

noted the award, how is it decided that its not significant? please note that Ryan Pagelow is already mentioned on other Knowledge (XXG) articles noting webcomic awards

965:

Sorry for the inconvienient, I'm learning how to edit with my class of the UNIPD university, hope there is no problem right now, isn't it? Have a good day, manofredda

152:

Seven These reductions may be traded on behalf of administrations to emission producers to help meet their limits, promote and finance the transfer of technology

3431:

Hi, Are you able to respond to my query regarding Ken Davis Music not being notable enough for Knowledge (XXG). Can you please explain? Thanks regards Kevin.

1768:

Comment: Addendum: I do however believe that this may well trip over other AfC criteria before being accepted. Nosebagbear (talk) 21:15, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

559:

Nevermind, an anonymous IP editor submitted it while vandalizing the draft. I have rolled back to before their edit. My apologies that you had to review it.

3808:, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools. 3710: 3235: 1293: 1018:

As I am a first time user, I tried to do as much as possible. Can you please tell me if I send you the information and source are you able to do the pace?

356: 334: 326: 3579: 3321: 3204:

that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the

2860: 2829:– allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself. 1256: 495: 3494:

Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please

3570: 1842:

When you're done deleting my admission of the Freewheelers Cello Band, can you also completely delete my profile please? I have nothing with wikipedia.

720: 999:

within a saminary of Univesity of Padua. I forgot to specify in the edit summary the source of the original text. I will be more carefull next time. --

4177: 1746: 1647: 2748: 2728: 2720: 2716: 2575:

Hi there. We are all volunteers here. AFC Drafts are reviewed in no specific order. Please be patient, your article will be reviewed soon. Thanks. --

1765:

I understand not everything is suitable for wikipedia but this is a recognized comic and award winning comic strip. Please let me know your thoughts

3301: 3246:

Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the

480:"significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondarysources that are independent of the subject:" 2680: 1240: 3724: 692:, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is 3486:

submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.

483:

Here are some citations, I've included them in the submission article too. As you'll notice there are multiple citations spanning about 2 years

4056: 2960:

3. Especially The sequences of type 3 in the mentioned article are completely new version and the promotion of which can be a new contribution

1517: 571: 549: 3065: 2963: 2186: 2171: 2034: 2019: 1569:

Thanks for reviewing my first wiki page! Your feedback was greatly appreciated! (Also congrats on being a wiki user for 7 years and 3 days.)

3307: 3133: 2769: 2684: 4189: 4173: 3845: 3603: 3345: 2886: 2534:

Dear Mr. David can you explan me why my article Draft:Jindal_Poly_Films_Ltd is rejected, please help us to make it published in wikipedia.

2290: 1314: 889: 816: 603: 3215:

Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.

2320: 2141: 1989: 86: 81: 69: 64: 59: 4132:

The research on the stand-alone list has been acquired from an institution called Bolagsverket (Swedish Companies Registration Office,

2773: 2305:

Hi David, Hope you good. Could you tell me the advice / suggestion to improve my rejected article "Agaram InfoTech Private Limited".

2088: 1936: 1499:

Hey, you declined my contributions to the article Date Gone Wrong. I've added more citations, I request you to review it again. Link:

1277: 3896: 3045: 2758: 411: 4022: 2701:

tag and gently remind (or inform) editors that translations from other language Knowledge (XXG) pages still require attribution per

727:

which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.

487: 4093: 2731:

for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (

1616: 1033: 980: 3025:

on my watchlist but this editor introduced Americanisms into a British article. Such as "stomps on", where anyone whose read an

2777: 511: 3841: 3599: 3446: 3341: 3260: 2882: 1860: 1310: 1224:, with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Knowledge (XXG) in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years. 885: 812: 431: 259: 2688: 868: 795: 3916: 3034: 1897: 2570: 3495: 2832: 2826: 2438: 1742: 1643: 1547: 370: 329:

for the purpose of requesting bug fixes and missing/useful features to be added to the New Page Feed and Curation Toolbar.

1067: 3412: 3004: 2645: 2557: 3083: 712:

With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also

4089: 1798: 880: 807: 742: 496:

http://www.digitaltransactions.net/with-checkbook-a-payments-veteran-creates-a-souped-up-engine-for-check-21-clearing/

396: 4115:

My name is Tony Westling, I read your comment on my draft "Draft:Swedish Video Game Industry" and I read the article

3558:, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway. 3528:

have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.

4052: 2695: 1576: 1513: 901: 210: 38: 3074: 1058:

Would really appreciate if you could have another look at it and see if it would pass now, with more information.

3805: 3122: 3112: 3059: 3030: 2813: 2175: 2023: 3091: 568: 546: 3666: 3639: 2967: 2286: 1738: 1660: 1639: 1093: 1076: 607: 185: 47: 17: 2403:. That is, they have significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Thank you. 856: 783: 3000: 2641: 449: 3934: 3864: 2316: 2137: 1985: 1457:

from the draft. If you have any other feedback on the article is would be greatly appreciated. Please do at

377: 4157:

I think this is very interesting and I wonder how the article (AfC) must satisfy WP:LISTN to be published?

4139:

Thereafter I've collected data from independent sources from the links in the list and written them there.

4048: 4044: 4010: 3434: 3400: 3247: 2583: 2545: 2308: 2278: 2129: 2076: 1977: 1924: 1885: 1848: 1734: 1635: 1604: 1572: 1535: 1509: 1505: 1021: 968: 915: 599: 561: 539: 247: 206: 3382: 3272: 3201: 3118: 3055: 2906: 2839: 2809: 2741: 2228: 2084: 1932: 1825: 1779: 4129:

I've researched on Knowledge (XXG) about significant coverage, reliable sources and independent sources.

3635: 2282: 2190: 2161: 2038: 2009: 1089: 1072: 181: 164:

Ten Transit systems must be expanded upon quickly & efficiently to reduce the threat to our planet by

4018: 3860: 3022: 2604:

I have added more reference, and made changes to the draft with help of ishwar Looking for ur feedback

2257: 2133: 1981: 1466: 1458: 440: 156:

Eight The bulk of these sales to directly fund planning and construction for Branches of transit systems

3925: 3500: 3479: 3378: 3264: 2808:

clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See

2497: 2484: 2476: 2224: 2100: 2080: 1948: 1928: 1821: 1790: 1775: 717:

Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers'

316:

As of 21 October 2018, there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.

122:

Two Vessels are carbon reservoirs. They are like trees which store the Greenhouse Gases in Lines or

4014: 2723:

for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (

2576: 1116: 931: 908: 3982:

said videos. And there aren't other references I can use at this time. I hope you can consider them.

3147: 1713: 1709: 1612: 1068:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/User:Lordofthefloor/sandbox?markasread=151070644&markasreadwiki=enwiki

1029: 1025: 976: 3729: 3438: 3268: 1424: 1385: 1346: 937: 843: 770: 642: 294: 251: 4198: 3965: 3906: 3662: 3442: 3353: 3230: 2933: 2761:

recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for

2527: 2501: 2423: 2404: 2362: 2194: 2153: 2104: 2042: 2001: 1952: 1856: 1802: 1670: 1448: 1428: 1389: 1350: 1085:

Hey there! I have updates the article with more content with relevant references, hope this helps.

941: 522: 457: 425: 255: 3942: 2702: 2466: 2457: 2394: 1539: 852: 779: 3998: 3969: 3910: 3404: 2605: 2549: 2428:. Can you please be more specific by giving an example: That is, please for example look at Prof 2336: 2312: 1893: 1481: 3788: 3749:

Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator

2799: 223: 488:

https://www.ca.com/us/modern-software-factory/content/the-company-checkbook-goes-paperless.html

3878:

As a member of the legislature he is unquestionably notable. I'm going to accept the article.

3812: 3681: 3621: 3462: 3180: 3163: 2919: 2902: 2663: 1543: 1004: 658: 3754: 2929: 2805: 864: 791: 512:

https://www.accountingtoday.com/news/checkbookio-offers-digital-checks-and-invoicing-services

130:

Three Public Transportation reduces the load on arteries in both urban & rural settings

4209: 4181: 4097: 4060: 4026: 4002: 3973: 3889: 3868: 3849: 3670: 3643: 3607: 3450: 3416: 3408: 3386: 3357: 3169: 3126: 3038: 3008: 2971: 2944: 2910: 2890: 2649: 2613: 2609: 2593: 2561: 2553: 2531: 2512: 2488: 2447: 2415: 2373: 2324: 2294: 2261: 2253: 2232: 2205: 2179: 2145: 2115: 2092: 2053: 2027: 1993: 1963: 1940: 1901: 1864: 1829: 1813: 1783: 1750: 1717: 1681: 1651: 1620: 1580: 1551: 1521: 1489: 1485: 1470: 1462: 1432: 1393: 1384:

Very much about Ramkishan Suthar is being searched and its information is asked very much.

1354: 1318: 1097: 1080: 1037: 1008: 984: 952: 923: 893: 820: 748: 611: 575: 553: 526: 503: 402: 263: 231: 214: 189: 3767: 3766:

Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for

3537: 3483: 3280: 3276: 2925: 2493: 2472: 2433: 2400: 2346: 1794: 1666: 867:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 860: 794:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 787: 4106: 3824:

is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its

1608: 1218:

have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only sevenmonths, while

996: 972: 227: 2854: 4075: 4037:

hello David this is my first article i have add more sources and info please look : -->

2986: 2627: 2452:

What is really obscure is that provided that every sentence is backed up by a link to a

1410: 1371: 1332: 3349: 2523: 1852: 518: 421: 134:

Four Cities must choose to increase market share of public transit from a typical 9%

4163:

Can a general description of "Swedish Video Game Industry" be helpful to the article?

3804:

Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See

3994: 3885: 1889: 203: 4193: 907:

Yea, I was going to decline it too, but how do I sign up to become a reviewer too?--

3160: 2480: 2429: 1799:

http://kingfeatures.com/2004/03/bizarro-wins-genesis-award-for-outstanding-cartoon/

1000: 719:, and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an 2957:

2. The derivation of nth term and finding summation of n terms is completely new.

834: 761: 638: 290: 118:

One Public Transportation has significant potential for the storage of carbon

4007:

My page was declined. However iam the manager of Kyshawn "IamYoungHitta" Wyman

3026: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2189:. Thank you for your comment. You are indeed correct, the subject does satisfy 2037:. Thank you for your comment. You are indeed correct, the subject does satisfy 160:

Nine Retire the long-debt for the construction of public transportation systems

3757:

if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

2896:

international press, so if you are seeking help as well, please let me know.

4166:

Thank you for your patience and understanding, and I hope to hear from you.

4143: 3208:

on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:

2683:

that Google Translate is now available for translating articles through the

3820: 3238:

about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.

1562: 1051:

I saw that you rejected my article about producer and artist Erik Wikholm.

2246: 1500: 1171: 594: 4136:), collected by a person on all registered Swedish video game companies. 3880: 995:

I was writing in a course and i copied the text from an existing article

4116: 3139: 2542:

Can you please review my draft Divya krishnan. Let me know the changes

871:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

798:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

138:

Five Shipping and delivery of packages extends the reach of the rider

3761:

Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion

2456:

isn't it somewhat arbitrary to reject these sources as "non-reliable"?

2126:

Hi, David kindly help me out why my article has been rejected by you.

1974:

Hi, David kindly help me out why my article has been rejected by you.

1480:

Can you complete my page or pls help me in completing (Divya krishnan)

4160:

Can I ask for your advice about creating the Knowledge (XXG) article?

2069: 1917: 637:

Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on

289:

Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on

3521: 1296:, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers. 696:

as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.

4038: 3196: 1202: 1159: 308:

Hello David.moreno72, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

2772:

on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for

4120: 2500:, then by all means, add them to the page and resubmit. Thank you 1196: 1153: 960: 348: 3659:

Can you tell me what to do? or what is the next step? Thank you.

477:

Thanks for reviewing the submission. Per wikipedia guideline(s):

392:

to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —

204:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Draft:Kamal_Mustafa_(DJ)

1208: 1183: 242: 4147: 3225: 1461:

so everybody can see. Otherwise, thank you for your time :-) --

1131: 874:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

801:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

736: