User talk:DavidOaks - Knowledge (XXG)

274:

distressing. Just figure this as one of your bad days; if you keep defending it, it becomes a pattern rather than an exception to one. Now, as to the academic thing -- I didn't say I was one (though you self-identify as such). I said there is an animus at WP against academics, and your remarks make it clear that when you think you sense one, you particpate in that ill-will. I would accept your offer to "take you on," but what I keep encountering is a distressing refusal to respond to the actual and specific issues raised. I rarely respond to disputes of this kind (I guess because I am rarely involved with them) but the crappiness of behavior combined with the smugness with which it's defended provide unusual motivation. When teachers cite this sort of thing as one of the chief reasons why classroom use of Knowledge (XXG) is destructive rather than educational, it gets hard to argue with. Once again, the behavior here is unusual. Were it otherwise, cumulative wikipolicy in discussions not going one's way would be to complain, lie, and get intervention, while dodging all reasonable requests for discussion. I take the opportunity to flag misbehavior so that we don't end up there.

1438:) or similar folklore. Adopted lore in other words. The origin of the legend may be lost forever though, but it is quite likely that the Spaniards had something to do with disseminating it given that it exists only in regions colonized by imperial Spain. I know of no other cryptid with the same habits. A lot of very weird customs were carried over by the Spaniards to us. And Conquistadores as we all know, are VERY thorough when it comes to cultural brainwashing. We were one of the lucky ones, but you only have to look at our nearest neighbors (Malaysia and Indonesia) and notice the vast difference in our cultures despite being virtually part of one empire a mere few hundred years ago. Our culture is more Latin American than Asian. 2325: 1417:

pictures of albino rabbits or kangaroos to gullible ignorant filipinos to wheedle money out of them for expeditions. Not to mention the gradual mating of Chinese beliefs with native/Hispanic ones bringing about the sub-myth that owning a Sigbin brings good luck, and an even more ridiculous myth that its blood can cure all kinds of illnesses, from cancer to AIDS. These con-men might actually have been a vehicle for further drifting the definitions of the original cryptid introduced perhaps by the Spanish into what they are today. I'm betting they have very similar con-men like that in Latin America as well.

474:

isn't big enough for somebody to go find out. I think directors personally put stuff in films to screw with the audience and see if they are watching. Why I think it is important, is in the scene between Wayne and Dern, the scene is about "lies" and principals. I think that Rydell used a factual lie to justify the lie of that guy not working there. It was a trick (ironic joke) by Rydell on the viewer. But, I am probably one of the few people to want to call him on it. It was done for a reason, a reason that will blow past most viewers.

427:, but what if you want to know more about the setting, or filming location, or something like that? At those sites, you can't find out about the Ruby River, or Belle Fourche. You have to go and find another site. The beauty and advantage of Knowledge (XXG) is being able to have articles about these other topics and subjects and linking them together. This enhances the learning process. Be removing that, you take away the advantage. As long as things are factual and cited, and pertains to the article, let it stand. 1820: 2399: 960: 783: 715: 1117:, you inserted the your RfC in the middle of an existing thread. I am getting quite tired of your endless personal accusations, uncivil attitude, sloppy and unsigned edits, and inappropriate behavior. Edit warring does not only consist of multiple reverts. Keep your remarks civil and impersonal, and be careful with your edits, or I will file a formal complaint. You will receive no further warnings. 456:

there like me. So, when a film (or book, etc.) mentions something like a gold strike on the Ruby River I want to find out where it is, when did this happen, etc. Not everybody is a like, but it is better to default to those who want to know about it, than those that don't to take advantage of Knowledge (XXG)'s capabilities. Some of you guys don't seem to want anymore information that is in

2220: 2501: 1896: 21: 1250:

documentation. Should we once again invite missionaries to write books with misspelled names of local legends for us so it gains credibility? That's another topic though. If you still wish to delete my additions to the article, do so. I will not contest it, because I know someone else will notice the missing relationship in the future. And hopefully, it will be a missionary. --

1970: 1937: 2196:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are 840:- - You were invited, numerous times, to use the talk page, and chose not to do so. You were advised of wikipolicy. 3RR does not apply to reverting those in violation of policy. Look above, and you will observe that you have received good and diplomatic counsel in the past about your style of communication. 1416:

I grew up with these legends (I'm from the southernmost island group - Mindanao, more rural perhaps than the home provinces of the filipinos you know). We even have professional con-men here who go around practicing quack medicine with purported sigbin parts. They 'prove' they have sigbins by showing

1296:

Yes, we need to cite everything,and there's really no difficulty in citing the fact that something is believed-in, without regard to whether the belief is itself warranted by fact; no need to make a Po-Co grievance out of it; the conundrum's familiar in folklore of the dominant western industrialized

505:

again, and then come up with some other reason why my contribution don't belong. That entire section is filled with the words "views", "viewpoint", "fringe theories", etc., The fact is that they are mentioned in the book and the film, there is no "weight" here, facts are facts. It was not Original

1747:

Hey David, I'm the one mentioned above digging up possible images for the collage. I've been going by the lists of possible alternatives generated last month at the talkpage there. I dug up a few today and am waiting for input from other users before I go any further. My general plan has been to get

422:

Why do people come to Knowledge (XXG)? To learn. This is an encyclopedia. The great advantage of Knowledge (XXG) over a paper/hard bound encyclopedia and most other sites on the Internet is that a user who wants to learn about something can use hyperlinks to easily dig deeper about something that

403:

has to do with Point-of-View versus Neutral POV. The mentions of the Ruby River, near where it meets the Beaverhead River, in the mid 1870s, and the rail-head at Belle Fourche, South Dakota are: 1) in the book by William Dale Jennings; 2) in the script written by Irving Ravetch, Harriet Frank, Jr.,

159:

David, have you followed the link? Not much about Maigue Poets there, with the possible exception of Wrinkle Cream, which they could doubtless do with after 300 years. But maybe you're questioning my edit note: I do try to make these comprehensible but maybe this one isn't, in which case I apologize

2517:

status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original

1775:

This approach, like McLuhan's, kept the field open not just to the study of aesthetic culture but to the way physical and behavioral artifacts of oral societies are used to store, manage and transmit knowledge, so that oral tradition provides methods for investigation of cultural differences, other

1473:

Anyway, hope that's a good enough reason? I will migrate citations when I have the time in the next few days if you have no objections. And yeah, I do try to cite things in my other contributions, except where it is simply impossible - like my own native dialect (not tagalog) which has virtually no

1451:

Some examples of superstitions shared with Latin America (and Spain): The belief that whistling or sweeping the floors after sunset brings bad luck, dropping a fork means a female visitor will arrive soon, dropping a spoon means a male visitor, jumping over open fires after visiting the cemetery on

921:

I do not see any point in repeating to you that dozens of reliable third party resources such as textbooks, dictionaries and encyclopedias refer to the technical term "folk etymology" with a very specific meaning while you refer to snopes and sources which do not even use the term. You have yet to

500:

The facts of the Ruby River being mentioned in the book, the script, and the film, are just that FACTS, not any viewpoint what-so-ever. There is no POV in the facts, they are neutral. Anybody who watches the film or takes the time to read the book can not say that the Ruby River and Belle Fourche

455:

When I watch a film, I want to know where it was set, I want to know when it was set, I want to learn about the setting, what was going on at that time in that place. I want to know where it was filmed. Now of course this is just me, and what I like. But I am sure that there are other people out

445:

is just a little Western and is only liked mainly by John Wayne fans. I personally think that Roscoe Lee Browne and Bruce Dern are very good in this film, they almost upstage Wayne. The rest of the cast could be changed, but those two are good. These people who around putting in the "plot is too

1725:

again. Things have been quiet and the editors that have returned have been polite and trying hard to find images for the collage. I think, gosh I hope, you are the same editor that was at this article before. I am trying hard to get editors to return to this article to finish fixing the collage

1274:

The claim that these other two creatures are versions of the chupacabra is quite a significant one; it suggests lines of diffusion. Or that the things are similar; that would suggest biological connection (if the cryptid turned out to be an actual animal). That would be different from establishing

536:

page? While a discussion of your edit of the Ruby River, etc., et al., may belong there, I don't see how our discussing how you understand and remove content because of it from articles has anything to do with that article? It could be about any article, not just that one. This is about you and

1249:

Also, the irony of being incredibly strict for a 'paper trail' on a mythical creature is not lost on me. I mean, sure, it's Knowledge (XXG). But it is quite euro-centric when you think of it. A fair amount of information from folk mythology from non-western nations like ours do not have published

1157:

The parts I added are uncited because they have plenty of citations in their respective articles. Why add more to the already overflowing page? (Which, to be honest, is the messiest article I've seen so far) The keywords are linked and anyone can follow them to their own articles easily. It's a

483:

If you look at my edits, I don't just put shit in for shit's sake. I have references, I put in facts. I don't add willy-nilly stuff, but have a reason. But, I am not going to fight you guys. You know what you want and have your agendas and I don't understand them. I just wish you guys would

473:

over two years ago. It was fine. But, Monkeyzpop is a stubborn KIA and I don't feel like fighting him. The Dillard Fant/Santa Rosa is not in Jennings book, it was added in the film (probably to see if anybody was paying attention). I don't know why it was added, or who added it, and the film

1521:

Hi, David. Although I have a lot of opinions and don't mind sharing them (as you've evidently noticed), I'm not sure I have anything useful to contribute — for a couple of reasons. First, my interest in forms of etymology that are conventionally called "false" or "folk" (which I don't regard as

257:

David, there's a rule somewhere around here that states that article talk pages are for discussing articles, not the editors. Secondly, the current use of your user page might not be the best way for you to gain recognition as a serious academic. Thirdly, the Knowledge (XXG) is the encyclopedia

1187:

section. Was it an arbitrary decision on your part based on the fact that the Philippines is halfway around the world from Latin America? Here's the thing, the Philippines was also a Spanish colony and shared much of cryptozoological myths and legends with Latin America (and much of the same

436:

As for the "Plot" section length, you guys need to get together an establish a guideline of how long that section should be. To me, a good size chunk, say 1/4th to 1/3th of the article can be in the "Plot" section. That article is now only 7,450 bytes long. There are some film articles in

273:

Kudpung, you listened to someone who was engaged in bad conduct -- demonstrable untruths against an editor with a very good record -- and added your own bad conduct to it. Thoughtlessness rather than malice, but bad conduct nonetheless. Your own good record as an editor makes this especially

1264:

Sorry if I over-deleted; please understand that the article has been a bit of a junk-magnet, as fortean topics often are. If these creatures are related to the Chupacabra, just use the refs from the other article -- yes, they do need to be repeated independently here, because the claims are

1474:

written works associated to it). Maybe even add more sources to the Sigbin entry itself to fill in blanks (can't speak for the Peuchen as I know nothing about that personally). If you still object, I'll comply and not revert it again. In the meantime, it's 2 AM here, heh.-

1528: 1782:

It's a very interesting and controversial idea - basically, that cultural objects have biographies - that appears in selected other pockets of Anthropology (e.g. Nick Thomas, Appadurai and Kopytoff, especially Alfred Gell), but I wasn't aware of it's occurrence in Ong.

506:

Research, it was in the book and film, it is easily verifiable, just read the book or watch the film (or read the script). How can I be in the "minority" if I got it straight from the horses-mouth? Guess I will go bang my head against a brick wall now. : -->

942:

I have avoided requesting that you be sanctioned, given your actions seem well intentioned, if misguided, and that other paths are open to you. In payment for my attempts at tolerance you have filed misguided complaints. Be advised I will provide no more

404:

and Jennings; and 3) in the film directed by Mark Rydell and produced and released by Warner Bros. There is no POV/NPOV about it. It is just the fact of the way it is. I don't understand your application of Knowledge (XXG):Neutral point of view. : -->

1369:. Closer even. If you strip away all the other conflicting accounts it will boil down to this: Both the Sigbin and the Chupacabra are dog-sized vampire-like 'monsters' preying on the blood of livestock that hop as a primary source of locomotion. 1402:

In fact, using your analogy and playing a Sesame Street 'which does not belong' game haha, I'd break it down like this: If the Sasquatch is the Chupacabra, then the Sigbin is the Yeti, and the Peuchen the Jackalope. Based on habits and physical

1962:

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to

490:"Neutrality requires that each article or other page in the mainspace fairly represents all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint, giving them "due weight"." 1600:

And precisely which votes were stacked? And how was that done? And by whom? To whom? It is one thing to make an accusation. It is another to prove it. Apparently you are unencumbered by actually having read the rule you claim was

258:

anyone can edit, so editors will have to put up with other editors (who might not even be subject matter experts) barging in and giving their 2 cents. And finally, if you want to pick on academics, try me for size ;) Take it easy. --

2007:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in

1526:

and often of "theology." In this sense, it was neither "folk," because it was etymology as practiced by the intellectual elite, nor "false," because it reflected and expressed theories of language or belief systems. (As in

2096:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

2289:. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the 1132:

You are continuing an established and documented pattern of abusive communication and harassment. Keep your communications to the article's talkpage. If you want to initiate an action, I strongly encourage you to do so.

2282:

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on

357:

Dunno -- thge White House is a building, and doesn't say anything (at work, I have a policy of refusing to take calls from anything but human beings) -- I'd name the specific organization within the executive branch.

127:

Oaks edits of political enterpretations of Oz ruined the page. This used to be an infromative site, with various enterpretations listed and nice pictures. Now the pictures are all gone and the page is an empty shell.

1460:, modern Dios, Dieu, Divine, Deity, Jupiter, Devi, etc.) The sigbin legend may have originated from something like that and then spread by conquistadores and Spanish colonists as a generic 'demon' to scare natives. 1211:

In the future please do read the linked articles before deleting them outright. Also read the entire article and you will actually encounter an account of a chupacabra sighting in the Philippines (6th paragraph,

2145:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 698:

Once again I invite you to remove the non-referenced examples from the article. But there is no burden on me to let your edit stand simply because a part of it is valid. And I do agree that a part of it is

1452:

All Saints' Day to get rid of 'bad spirits', etc. Then there is the demonization of local beliefs as well by the missionaries. Our 'fairy folk' (long sinced transformed to european ideals of the fae), the

1207:

is now the more commonly used word after Spanish was dropped in favor of English as the secondary national language. Do a google search of chupacabra+sigbin. Or ask a filipino, if you happen to know one.

1348:

itself as a name is Spanish and merely means 'goat sucker', making it even more apparent that it is not exclusive and is probably hispanic derived. Hence why I didn't think twice about elaborating on it.

1265:

different, and because each article stands alone (otherwsie, bit by bit, Knowledge (XXG) creeps into being its own reference -- it already happens that we cite websites that origianlly cited wikipedia).

780:

For the record, here's what s/he deleted from her/his own talk-page; the user has been warned repeatedly about edit-warring and abrasive communication; there ought to be some sort of record... - -

604:

Thanks for your response on my talk page. You're rational for keeping both categories makes sense to me. I'll work on the related articles to make sure they're consistent. Thanks again for your help.

2244:; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Knowledge (XXG). If you believe this file is not replaceable, please: 446:

short" and the "plot is too long" tags need to find something else to do. Like just add to it or subtract, or add to another section. I would love to see the "Production" section expanded on films.

1087:

See, you found it. And you still need manners. I know that this is not a problem with all linguists, because I know a great many intimately. But it does seem to be an issue with the local group.

184:

David, I should have handled that postmortem correction better– you had the right idea. I spotted the missing preposition and realized the paragraph needed more, but you were on the right track.

1323:

Noted. Sorry, just tired I guess. Long day, heh. New to wikipedia editing and not a regular. No idea that was a vandal-magnet though. Just realized that now after realizing it's semi-protected.

1377:

itself merited a mention when its only similarity is that it also sucks blood from livestock and is near geographically, even if physical descriptions are far more different than that of the

1531:) This kind of speculation of course must be distinguished from the aims of scientific linguistics, but can be revealing in its own way. Anyway, I'm not sure any of that is pertinent here. 1231:, I even linked it for you) if you want. At least that will actually be real work. Rather than screaming vandalism, not bothering to check if it has merit at all, then clicking backspace. 981:

states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the

804:

states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the

736:

states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the

1019:

We will let this admin process run its course. Meanwhile, kinda busy -- giving an invited talk at a folklore congress on linguistic approaches to paremiological research on the internet.

2189: 1779:

Can I get a more precise citation for this statement? Are you paraphrasing Ong here? If so, would you be kind enough to direct me to the text (page numbers). If not, whom and where?

484:

point out where in the MOS or Help section it says that information can't stay? I can't tell if you guys are making up your own rules or not? I strongly disagree with your use of

1033:

Please learn how to link. I tried to follow your link to an AN/I comment, but the link just goes to the page without linking to a specific section. I found no AN/I complaint at

2576: 2571: 1571: 937:

You continue to cite Snopes as your best reference, and to add a highly inappropraite demand that I provide a reference for material which you yourself added to the article.

2538:

to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Knowledge (XXG). Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a

1430:

The connection is probably not biological (extremely unlikely that it's a real animal really), but cultural and subsequently attached to local animals (as noted in the

1748:

consensus on a set of 10 to 12 images, and then get consensus on placement of those images into the collage format. Pop in any time and see what you think. Regards,

1699:

Thanks -- I really appreciate the willingness to look over a long and complex disc ussion; I think what it needs most is input from people not heretofore involved.

2060: 1908:. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license. 1873: 1920: 1499: 2055:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

1868:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

1997: 441:

is 94,449 bytes). Now of course some of these films that are larger should be larger, they had a bigger impact on American culture and on other filmmakers.

2276: 2119: 1073:. My manners are fine. I was blunt and if your links do not lead to where the complaint is, then you do, indeed, need to learn how to link properly. -- 2193: 1642:

I am sure, DavidOaks, you will be just as glad to hear this complaint has been reopened, however briefly, as I have been to keep writing on the topic.

423:

they might want to know more about. If they, don't, they don't need to click on the link. If you go to a site like IMDb or TCM, you can read about

2460: 2017: 2525:

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a

2439: 460:, or similar work. But, then what is the point of having Knowledge (XXG) and the ability to use links and have larger-more filled out-articles? 2543: 2294: 2290: 2237: 2025: 1534:

Which brings me to the second point: it's a massive discussion, and I'm not sure what the issues are. I may watch a while to try to catch up.

76:. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than 2518:

copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the

2406: 2392: 2170: 1869: 1861: 2526: 2197: 2101: 1944:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter 35:. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. 1275:

the fact that another formerly colonized and Spanish-inheriting area on the other side of the globe also has cryptids. The article on

859:

Just out of curiosity, I get no hits at dictionary.com for tuquoque. Can you assist? Were you referring to "tu quoque" (thou also)? --

2052: 1865: 2464: 982: 805: 737: 56: 2001: 1993: 27: 2324: 2166: 570: 62:

This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than

998: 922:

provide an argument that any reliable source provides any alternative main sense for this well defined and referenced concept.

821: 753: 2275:

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,

902:. If you continue edit warring, you will be blocked. If you do not think you can get justice on the talk page, please pursue 226: 2452: 2410: 2388: 1002: 825: 757: 73: 2519: 2509: 1911:

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

1987: 1799: 1609: 640: 582: 574: 121: 116: 111: 106: 2456: 2233: 2021: 1981: 586: 578: 864: 2157:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

1456:, were actually once native gods and goddesses. (Note etymological relationship with Proto-Indo European roots for God 1223:

If you really can't stand the sight of uncited entries though, you can migrate the links from the respective articles (

1008: 831: 763: 2162: 1479: 1255: 1239: 1522:

synonymous) is focused on what etymology meant in antiquity and the early medieval period, where it was an aspect of

672:. I am notifying you as a party to that prior discussion. If you are interested, the current discussion is located 2375: 2361:}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. 2337: 1840: 1756: 1670: 1629: 609: 594: 685: 631:, and the heated exchanges that have led to the need to temporarily protect the article, I have started an RFC at 566: 207: 192: 994: 978: 965: 817: 801: 788: 749: 733: 720: 1579: 636: 546: 511: 409: 389: 2268: 974: 797: 729: 2115: 2111: 1621: 1475: 1251: 1235: 860: 1787: 1507: 211: 165: 142:

I just don't understand the edit summary ("Removed ref which led to some unrelated publicity...") Thanks!

2468: 2249: 2228: 2158: 986: 809: 741: 302:

I will happily comply with a specific and reasoned request. Which comments do you wish removed, and why?

2369: 2331: 1952: 1904: 1834: 1749: 1666: 1625: 911: 605: 590: 347: 2513:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 2354: 1916: 1795: 1605: 1336:

As mentioned, Sigbin was already linked before I did my edits. It wasn't my decision. Nonetheless, we

565:

Hi, David. Sorry I didn't include a reason for my edit earlier. Today I was working on clarifying the

2090: 2077: 589:

would be for laws and rulings in favor of physician-assisted suicide. What are your thoughts? Thanks!

585:

I thought it made sense to only include organizations and people active within the movement; whereas,

2486: 2358: 2056: 2048: 1613: 1604:

You both would do well to rethink your resolute (I would say "stubborn", but I don't want to violate

321: 293: 188: 2134: 2125: 1945: 970: 793: 725: 2302: 542: 507: 405: 385: 2154: 2138: 1791: 874:"Yeah, you too!" So when editor X says I'm pushing a POV, I can say....Dang, I can be pedantic.... 2552: 2279:, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject). 1539: 773: 220: 529: 502: 485: 400: 1196: 569:

so organizations and laws within the Death with Dignity movement were no longer lumped in with

2476: 2435: 1881: 1739: 1686: 1503: 263: 161: 132: 2150: 2142: 1344:, especially older folk who still speak Spanish (who are growing rarer every day). Note that 1066: 1034: 2205: 1662: 1647: 1587: 1561: 1122: 948: 907: 704: 681: 533: 381: 343: 2534: 2422: 2153:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2146: 1301:. I know two Filipinos; they are unfamiliar with any of these terms; tells us nothing much. 1191:

I am from the Philippines, and yes we DO sometimes hear old people refer to the cryptid as

1070: 903: 895: 627:

Hi. In the light of the current dispute regarding the inclusion of an image in the article

267: 2482: 2107: 2033: 1819: 1612:. I have given up on your folk entymology brouhaha, as there seems to be an intent to go 1078: 1042: 665: 650: 317: 289: 2277:

requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license

2014:

Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

1570:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at

635:. Please do add your opinion, and hopefully we can achieve a policy-based consensus. -- 2298: 1700: 1550: 1523: 1302: 1134: 1114: 1088: 1052: 1020: 899: 875: 841: 837: 661: 654: 359: 303: 275: 238: 143: 2421:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be

959: 782: 714: 2565: 2547: 1535: 215: 1877: 1727: 1682: 1298: 259: 1772:

I am very interested in the following passage that appears in "Oral Tradition":

342:

Thanks David. Do you think it should read: "According to the White House...."

2542:. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the 2345: 2313: 2201: 1643: 1620:. A resolution cannot be achieved unilaterally, nor can I impose one. You can 1617: 1583: 1557: 1118: 944: 932:

You have been invited to add your comments in any of several alternative venues.

700: 677: 288:

I really would appreciate it if you removed those comments from your user page.

2219: 2000:

justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See

2185: 2064: 2029: 1382: 1200: 1150: 1074: 1038: 985:

to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains

808:

to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains

740:

to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains

692: 178: 20: 2100:

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for

1113:

Besides your RfC wording being an inaccurate description of the positions at

2514: 1578:

I have reopened this complaint in regards solely to your votestacking. See

1362: 1284: 1276: 1162:

cryptids after all. I only expanded the relationship with a few sentences.

668:. Despite the consensus on that discussion, the move was effected. I have 501:

are NOT mentioned in them. I respectfully request that you go and re-read

1216:

subsection), justifying the reason why the two were linked, along with the

2271:, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable. 2240:. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have 1930:

Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to

1065:

Those two found it after another editor pointed them to it. It is not at

632: 2475:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

2104:, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided. 1574:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

673: 669: 2557: 2490: 2382: 2306: 2209: 2174: 2141:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

2071: 2037: 1885: 1847: 1803: 1763: 1741: 1726:

that has a consensus to rework it. I hope I see you there. Be well, --

1708: 1690: 1674: 1651: 1633: 1591: 1565: 1543: 1511: 1483: 1435: 1374: 1310: 1259: 1243: 1228: 1217: 1170: 1142: 1126: 1096: 1082: 1060: 1046: 1028: 952: 915: 883: 868: 849: 708: 644: 613: 598: 550: 515: 413: 393: 367: 351: 325: 311: 297: 283: 246: 231: 196: 169: 151: 87: 1832:

For consistency and excellence of contribution over a very long time

1431: 1378: 1224: 1192: 1180: 1166: 1556:

I am required to notify you of the following complaint against you.

1361:

And yes I do think it's is similar to the relationship between the

1366: 1280: 528:

How in the world does a discussion about your interpretation of

977:

with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the

800:

with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the

732:

with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the

2496:

File source problem with File:Ray wollbrinck vaudeville sm.jpg

1776:

than the purely verbal, between oral and literate societies.

1722: 628: 621: 40: 15: 2499: 2397: 2264:

with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.

2218: 1894: 2236:. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the 2192:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets 2063:

if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

1958:

to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

1876:

if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

1203:. Which suggests it was simply a dialect variation. Though 1001:. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary 824:. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary 756:. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary 2232:. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of 1721:

Hi, I think you could be very helpful at the talk page of

1051:

Those two found it just fine. Please learn some manners.

2539: 2463:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

2445:

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing

2285: 2254:{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason: --> 2009: 470: 140: 2428:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

2348:

to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.

2260:

the original replaceable fair use template, replacing

2004:

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

437:

Knowledge (XXG) that are much larger, up over 50,000 (

2407:

File:Advertisement for 1883 Veiled Prophet Parade.gif

2393:

File:Advertisement for 1883 Veiled Prophet Parade.gif

2293:. If you have any questions, please ask them at the 1572:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

1287:, even though both are claimed for the United States. 1856:

Possibly unfree File:Albatross (Big Wreck album).jpg

2024:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 2059:. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at 1872:. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at 2133:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 1500:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Brother Jed 991:do not edit war even if you believe you are right 814:do not edit war even if you believe you are right 746:do not edit war even if you believe you are right 927:You are ignoring the consensus of three editors. 1980:If you believe the media meets the criteria at 1891:File permission problem with File:Cupstone7.jpg 1608:) and I always bear in mind the sage advice of 2020:. You may wish to read the Knowledge (XXG)'s 660:You participated in a discussion on the page 8: 2577:Wikipedians who opt out of template messages 1994:Knowledge (XXG):File copyright tags#Fair use 2572:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery 1665:that might be of interest. Best regards. 31:. DavidOaks has not edited Knowledge (XXG) 906:or other avenues of dispute resolution. — 2529:and ask for a chance to fix the problem. 1179:I did my edits, yet you removed only the 963:You currently appear to be engaged in an 786:You currently appear to be engaged in an 718:You currently appear to be engaged in an 2215:Replaceable fair use File:Admiral ad.jpg 1919:or another acceptable free license (see 2434:notice, but please explain why in your 1925:at the site of the original publication 1915:make a note permitting reuse under the 85:. The original talk page is located at 28:This user may have left Knowledge (XXG) 2106:If you have any questions, please see 1283:, but it's no place to talk about the 2510:File:Ray wollbrinck vaudeville sm.jpg 2353:To give a Dobos torte and spread the 2053:Knowledge (XXG):Possibly unfree files 2047:A file that you uploaded or altered, 1866:Knowledge (XXG):Possibly unfree files 1860:A file that you uploaded or altered, 139:Hi, NM -- could you explain this edit 7: 2479:of each individual file for details. 2043:Possibly unfree File:Lawn jockey.jpg 1862:File:Albatross (Big Wreck album).jpg 989:among editors. If unsuccessful then 812:among editors. If unsuccessful then 744:among editors. If unsuccessful then 664:as to whether it should be moved to 583:Category:Death with Dignity movement 575:Category:Death with Dignity movement 2002:Knowledge (XXG):File copyright tags 1992:or one of the other tags listed at 1373:is reason enough to link them. The 670:requested that the move be reversed 587:Category:Physician-assisted suicide 579:Category:Physician-assisted suicide 488:, it says in the opening sentence: 2423:deleted for any of several reasons 2413:because of the following concern: 1297:societies as well; have a look at 14: 2448:{{proposed deletion/dated files}} 2431:{{proposed deletion/dated files}} 2159:review the candidates' statements 1037:relevant to Kwami and Medeis. -- 316:You've read my mind. :-) Thanks. 252: 2323: 2238:first non-free content criterion 2087:The media file you uploaded as: 1982:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content 1968: 1935: 1818: 1434:article and its relation to the 993:. Post a request for help at an 958: 816:. Post a request for help at an 781: 748:. Post a request for help at an 713: 469:I also added the fact about the 19: 2417:unused, low-res, no obvious use 1549:canvassing and edit warring at 573:. I created two subcategories: 571:William Francis Melchert-Dinkel 471:Dillard Fant and the Santa Rosa 2544:Media copyright questions page 2295:Media copyright questions page 2165:. For the Election committee, 2135:Arbitration Committee election 2126:ArbCom elections are now open! 2026:Media copyright questions page 1385:(The Peuchen is purportedly a 645:21:21, 28 September 2010 (UTC) 633:Talk:Man#RFC: image in article 614:17:10, 17 September 2010 (UTC) 599:23:54, 16 September 2010 (UTC) 1: 2210:14:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC) 2175:13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 2038:23:27, 5 September 2012 (UTC) 1948:. If you take this step, add 1764:21:30, 29 November 2010 (UTC) 1742:20:57, 29 November 2010 (UTC) 1709:13:45, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 1691:04:59, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 1675:22:30, 15 November 2010 (UTC) 1652:05:15, 19 November 2010 (UTC) 1634:22:11, 18 November 2010 (UTC) 1592:21:34, 18 November 2010 (UTC) 1566:21:41, 15 November 2010 (UTC) 1544:18:48, 15 November 2010 (UTC) 1512:19:09, 13 November 2010 (UTC) 1484:18:14, 13 November 2010 (UTC) 1311:15:04, 13 November 2010 (UTC) 1279:needs to mention the similar 1260:14:50, 13 November 2010 (UTC) 1244:14:15, 13 November 2010 (UTC) 1005:. If edit warring continues, 828:. If edit warring continues, 760:. If edit warring continues, 561:Compassion & Choices Edit 2383:22:51, 18 January 2017 (UTC) 2190:featured article review here 2018:criteria for speedy deletion 1848:18:17, 5 February 2012 (UTC) 1804:13:34, 5 February 2012 (UTC) 1143:07:31, 5 November 2010 (UTC) 1127:05:23, 5 November 2010 (UTC) 1097:04:08, 4 November 2010 (UTC) 1083:04:04, 4 November 2010 (UTC) 1061:03:54, 4 November 2010 (UTC) 1047:03:49, 4 November 2010 (UTC) 1029:03:44, 4 November 2010 (UTC) 953:03:11, 4 November 2010 (UTC) 916:01:43, 4 November 2010 (UTC) 884:21:43, 1 November 2010 (UTC) 869:21:39, 1 November 2010 (UTC) 850:23:51, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 709:21:40, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 687:04:18, 17 October 2010 (UTC) 2467:allows discussion to reach 2161:and submit your choices on 2080:missing description details 1173:were linked to the article 551:23:27, 17 August 2010 (UTC) 516:22:04, 17 August 2010 (UTC) 414:02:31, 17 August 2010 (UTC) 394:01:25, 17 August 2010 (UTC) 368:16:16, 11 August 2010 (UTC) 352:16:11, 11 August 2010 (UTC) 208:User talk sandbox:DavidOaks 2593: 2491:01:03, 10 April 2020 (UTC) 2459:exist. In particular, the 2307:04:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC) 2167:MediaWiki message delivery 2120:08:23, 14 April 2013 (UTC) 2453:proposed deletion process 2250:the file description page 2194:featured article criteria 2072:05:20, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 1969: 1936: 1886:15:44, 15 July 2012 (UTC) 1817: 1657:Message that concerns you 1013:without further notice. 768:without further notice. 567:Category:Assisted suicide 326:20:28, 24 July 2010 (UTC) 312:18:33, 24 July 2010 (UTC) 298:18:05, 24 July 2010 (UTC) 284:17:42, 24 July 2010 (UTC) 268:17:17, 24 July 2010 (UTC) 253:Devil's Playground (film) 170:18:21, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 152:15:30, 23 June 2010 (UTC) 2558:14:45, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 2507:Thank you for uploading 2269:the file discussion page 1704: 1306: 1138: 1092: 1056: 1024: 879: 836:without further notice. 363: 307: 279: 247:13:30, 7 July 2010 (UTC) 242: 232:13:04, 7 July 2010 (UTC) 197:00:57, 2 July 2010 (UTC) 160:(it can't be modified). 2291:non-free content policy 995:appropriate noticeboard 818:appropriate noticeboard 750:appropriate noticeboard 2527:request for undeletion 2520:image description page 2504: 2419: 2402: 2223: 1899: 1826:The Resilient Barnstar 1661:I posted a message at 1622:stew in your own juice 458:Halliwell's Film Guide 212:User:DavidOaks/sandbox 95:ki/User_talk:DavidOaks 2503: 2415: 2411:proposed for deletion 2401: 2226:Thanks for uploading 2222: 2139:Arbitration Committee 2057:file description page 2051:, has been listed at 1902:Thanks for uploading 1898: 1870:file description page 1864:, has been listed at 686:_Folk_Etymology": --> 33:since 27 January 2015 2540:list of your uploads 2532:Please refer to the 2465:files for discussion 2440:the file's talk page 2262:<your reason: --> 2049:File:Lawn jockey.jpg 1988:non-free fair use in 1984:, use a tag such as 1614:Tilting at windmills 2229:File:Admiral ad.jpg 2143:arbitration process 1811:A barnstar for you! 637:Boing! said Zebedee 2505: 2457:deletion processes 2403: 2242:no free equivalent 2224: 2155:arbitration policy 2016:, as described on 1905:File:Cupstone7.jpg 1900: 1624:. Happy editing. 1610:WP:Don't be a dick 1214:Reported Sightings 999:dispute resolution 861:Steven J. Anderson 822:dispute resolution 754:dispute resolution 72:you are viewing a 2389:Proposed deletion 2366: 2365: 2359:subst:Dobos Torte 2297:. Thank you. -- 2252:and add the text 2184:I have nominated 2112:Theo's Little Bot 1853: 1852: 1807: 1790:comment added by 1476:Astepintooblivion 1252:Astepintooblivion 1236:Astepintooblivion 979:three-revert rule 971:edit disruptively 894:You have reached 802:three-revert rule 794:edit disruptively 734:three-revert rule 726:edit disruptively 133:Limerick (poetry) 103: 102: 39: 38: 2584: 2555: 2550: 2535:image use policy 2502: 2480: 2450: 2449: 2433: 2432: 2400: 2381: 2371:7&6=thirteen 2344:has given you a 2343: 2333:7&6=thirteen 2327: 2320: 2319: 2288: 2263: 2256: 2091:File:Vp 1883.gif 2078:File:Vp 1883.gif 2069: 2022:image use policy 1991: 1975: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1957: 1951: 1942: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1897: 1846: 1836:7&6=thirteen 1822: 1815: 1814: 1806: 1784: 1760: 1753: 1737: 1732: 1667:7&6=thirteen 1663:User talk:Medeis 1626:7&6=thirteen 1340:call the Sigbin 962: 785: 717: 606:Melissathebarber 591:Melissathebarber 534:Talk:The Cowboys 382:Talk:The Cowboys 237:oops -- thanks! 230: 99: 96: 93: 90: 84: 83: 80: 71: 69: 66: 55: 54: 51: 41: 23: 16: 2592: 2591: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2562: 2561: 2553: 2548: 2500: 2498: 2474: 2461:speedy deletion 2447: 2446: 2430: 2429: 2398: 2396: 2368: 2357:, just place {{ 2330: 2318: 2284: 2261: 2253: 2217: 2182: 2163:the voting page 2129: 2122: 2108:Help:Image page 2082: 2065: 2045: 2010:your upload log 1990:|article name}} 1985: 1967: 1965: 1955: 1949: 1934: 1932: 1895: 1893: 1858: 1833: 1813: 1785: 1758: 1751: 1733: 1728: 1719: 1659: 1554: 1519: 1496: 1188:superstition). 1155: 1003:page protection 892: 857: 826:page protection 778: 758:page protection 696: 666:False etymology 658: 651:False etymology 625: 563: 376: 374:Waiting on You. 340: 255: 218: 204: 189:UnicornTapestry 182: 137: 94: 91: 89:https://en.wiki 88: 86: 81: 78: 77: 67: 64: 63: 52: 49: 48: 12: 11: 5: 2590: 2588: 2580: 2579: 2574: 2564: 2563: 2497: 2494: 2471:for deletion. 2451:will stop the 2395: 2386: 2364: 2363: 2350: 2328: 2317: 2310: 2273: 2272: 2265: 2216: 2213: 2181: 2180:Fairy tale FAR 2178: 2132: 2128: 2123: 2094: 2093: 2085:Dear uploader: 2083: 2081: 2075: 2061:the discussion 2044: 2041: 2028:. Thank you. — 1966:permissions-en 1960: 1959: 1933:permissions-en 1928: 1892: 1889: 1874:the discussion 1857: 1854: 1851: 1850: 1829: 1828: 1823: 1812: 1809: 1769: 1767: 1766: 1718: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1694: 1693: 1658: 1655: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1602: 1595: 1594: 1553: 1551:folk etymology 1547: 1524:antiquarianism 1518: 1517:folk etymology 1515: 1495: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1165:Also BOTH the 1154: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1115:Folk etymology 1112: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 956: 955: 939: 938: 934: 933: 929: 928: 924: 923: 900:Folk etymology 891: 888: 887: 886: 856: 853: 777: 770: 695: 690: 662:Folk etymology 657: 655:Folk Etymology 648: 624: 618: 617: 616: 562: 559: 558: 557: 556: 555: 554: 553: 543:Best O Fortuna 537:POV not about 532:belong on the 521: 520: 519: 518: 508:Best O Fortuna 495: 494: 493: 492: 478: 477: 476: 475: 464: 463: 462: 461: 450: 449: 448: 447: 431: 430: 429: 428: 417: 416: 406:Best O Fortuna 386:Best O Fortuna 375: 372: 371: 370: 339: 336: 335: 334: 333: 332: 331: 330: 329: 328: 254: 251: 250: 249: 203: 200: 181: 176: 175: 174: 173: 172: 136: 130: 125: 124: 119: 114: 109: 101: 100: 61: 57:user talk page 44: 37: 36: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2589: 2578: 2575: 2573: 2570: 2569: 2567: 2560: 2559: 2556: 2551: 2546:. Thank you. 2545: 2541: 2537: 2536: 2530: 2528: 2523: 2521: 2516: 2512: 2511: 2495: 2493: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2478: 2472: 2470: 2466: 2462: 2458: 2454: 2443: 2441: 2437: 2426: 2424: 2418: 2414: 2412: 2408: 2394: 2390: 2387: 2385: 2384: 2379: 2378: 2373: 2372: 2362: 2360: 2356: 2351: 2347: 2341: 2340: 2335: 2334: 2329: 2326: 2322: 2321: 2315: 2311: 2309: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2287: 2280: 2278: 2270: 2266: 2259: 2251: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2243: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2230: 2221: 2214: 2212: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2195: 2191: 2187: 2179: 2177: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2156: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2127: 2124: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2110:. Thank you. 2109: 2105: 2103: 2098: 2092: 2089: 2088: 2086: 2079: 2076: 2074: 2073: 2070: 2068: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2042: 2040: 2039: 2035: 2031: 2027: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2011: 2005: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1989: 1983: 1978: 1976: 1974:wikimedia.org 1954: 1947: 1943: 1941:wikimedia.org 1929: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1909: 1907: 1906: 1890: 1888: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1875: 1871: 1867: 1863: 1855: 1849: 1844: 1843: 1838: 1837: 1831: 1830: 1827: 1824: 1821: 1816: 1810: 1808: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1780: 1777: 1773: 1770: 1765: 1762: 1761: 1755: 1754: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1740: 1738: 1736: 1731: 1724: 1716: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1664: 1656: 1654: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1573: 1568: 1567: 1563: 1559: 1552: 1548: 1546: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1532: 1530: 1525: 1516: 1514: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1493: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1459: 1455: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1403:descriptions. 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1232: 1230: 1226: 1221: 1219: 1215: 1209: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1189: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1177: 1172: 1168: 1163: 1161: 1158:sub-entry of 1152: 1149:Sigbin edit, 1148: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1012: 1010: 1004: 1000: 996: 992: 988: 984: 980: 976: 973:or refuse to 972: 968: 967: 961: 954: 950: 946: 941: 940: 936: 935: 931: 930: 926: 925: 920: 919: 918: 917: 913: 909: 905: 901: 897: 889: 885: 881: 877: 873: 872: 871: 870: 866: 862: 854: 852: 851: 847: 843: 839: 835: 833: 827: 823: 819: 815: 811: 807: 803: 799: 796:or refuse to 795: 791: 790: 784: 775: 771: 769: 767: 765: 759: 755: 751: 747: 743: 739: 735: 731: 728:or refuse to 727: 723: 722: 716: 711: 710: 706: 702: 694: 691: 689: 688: 683: 679: 675: 671: 667: 663: 656: 652: 649: 647: 646: 642: 638: 634: 630: 623: 619: 615: 611: 607: 603: 602: 601: 600: 596: 592: 588: 584: 580: 576: 572: 568: 560: 552: 548: 544: 540: 535: 531: 527: 526: 525: 524: 523: 522: 517: 513: 509: 504: 499: 498: 497: 496: 491: 487: 482: 481: 480: 479: 472: 468: 467: 466: 465: 459: 454: 453: 452: 451: 444: 440: 435: 434: 433: 432: 426: 421: 420: 419: 418: 415: 411: 407: 402: 398: 397: 396: 395: 391: 387: 383: 373: 369: 365: 361: 356: 355: 354: 353: 349: 345: 337: 327: 323: 319: 315: 314: 313: 309: 305: 301: 300: 299: 295: 291: 287: 286: 285: 281: 277: 272: 271: 270: 269: 265: 261: 248: 244: 240: 236: 235: 234: 233: 228: 225: 222: 217: 213: 209: 206:I have moved 202:Namespace vio 201: 199: 198: 194: 190: 185: 180: 177: 171: 167: 163: 158: 157: 156: 155: 154: 153: 149: 145: 141: 134: 131: 129: 123: 120: 118: 115: 113: 110: 108: 105: 104: 97: 75: 60: 58: 45: 43: 42: 34: 30: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 2533: 2531: 2524: 2508: 2506: 2477:page history 2473: 2455:, but other 2444: 2436:edit summary 2427: 2420: 2416: 2404: 2376: 2370: 2367: 2352: 2349: 2338: 2332: 2281: 2274: 2257: 2241: 2227: 2225: 2183: 2130: 2099: 2095: 2084: 2066: 2046: 2013: 2006: 1996:, and add a 1979: 1964: 1961: 1953:OTRS pending 1931: 1924: 1910: 1903: 1901: 1859: 1841: 1835: 1825: 1786:— Preceding 1781: 1778: 1774: 1771: 1768: 1757: 1750: 1734: 1729: 1720: 1660: 1641: 1569: 1555: 1533: 1520: 1504:Jaque Hammer 1497: 1457: 1453: 1387:winged snake 1386: 1370: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1299:Urban Legend 1233: 1222: 1213: 1210: 1204: 1190: 1184: 1175: 1174: 1164: 1159: 1156: 1111: 1011:from editing 1006: 990: 969:. Users who 964: 957: 893: 858: 845: 834:from editing 829: 813: 792:. Users who 787: 779: 766:from editing 761: 745: 724:. Users who 719: 712: 697: 659: 626: 564: 538: 489: 457: 442: 439:Citizen Kane 438: 424: 378:Well? : --> 377: 341: 256: 223: 205: 186: 183: 162:Nick Michael 147: 138: 126: 92:pedia.org/wi 46: 32: 26: 2346:Dobos torte 2314:Dobos torte 1618:Don Quixote 1606:WP:Civility 1498:Please see 1234:Good day.-- 1007:you may be 975:collaborate 830:you may be 798:collaborate 774:User Medeis 762:you may be 730:collaborate 539:The Cowboys 443:The Cowboys 425:The Cowboys 344:Gandydancer 74:mirror site 2566:Categories 2483:FastilyBot 2186:Fairy tale 2151:topic bans 1529:this book. 1383:Chupacabra 1346:chupacabra 1342:chupacabra 1201:Chupacabra 1151:Chupacabra 693:Mondegreen 318:Dougweller 290:Dougweller 179:James Dean 122:/Archive 4 117:/Archive 3 112:/Archive 2 107:/Archive 1 47:This is a 2515:copyright 2469:consensus 2409:has been 2405:The file 2299:Marchjuly 2286:this link 2147:site bans 1998:rationale 1921:this list 1701:DavidOaks 1601:violated. 1363:Sasquatch 1303:DavidOaks 1285:jackalope 1277:Sasquatch 1197:Amamayong 1183:from the 1135:DavidOaks 1089:DavidOaks 1069:, but at 1053:DavidOaks 1021:DavidOaks 987:consensus 983:talk page 943:warnings. 876:DavidOaks 842:DavidOaks 838:DavidOaks 810:consensus 806:talk page 742:consensus 738:talk page 360:DavidOaks 304:DavidOaks 276:DavidOaks 239:DavidOaks 144:DavidOaks 2481:Thanks, 2355:WikiLove 2316:for you! 2234:fair use 2102:deletion 1917:CC-BY-SA 1800:contribs 1788:unsigned 1681:Me too. 1536:Cynwolfe 1381:and the 1365:and the 1185:See Also 1169:and the 997:or seek 966:edit war 855:Tuquoque 820:or seek 789:edit war 752:or seek 721:edit war 620:RFC for 530:WP:UNDUE 503:WP:UNDUE 486:WP:UNDUE 401:WP:UNDUE 227:contribs 216:RHaworth 1878:Stefan2 1792:Tartiss 1730:Crohnie 1683:Bruxism 1616:, like 1436:cat-fox 1375:Peuchen 1229:Peuchen 1218:Peuchen 1171:Peuchen 1160:related 1153:article 1067:WP:AN/I 1035:WP:AN/I 1009:blocked 890:warning 832:blocked 764:blocked 541:. : --> 338:alt med 260:Kudpung 2554:plicit 2438:or on 2248:Go to 2202:Sadads 2188:for a 2137:. The 2116:error? 1644:μηδείς 1584:μηδείς 1558:μηδείς 1458:deiwo- 1454:Diwata 1432:Sigbin 1379:Sigbin 1225:Sigbin 1205:Sigbin 1193:Sigbin 1181:Sigbin 1176:before 1167:Sigbin 1119:μηδείς 1071:WP:AN3 945:μηδείς 904:WP:RFC 896:WP:3RR 701:μηδείς 699:valid. 678:μηδείς 581:. For 399:Huh? 2258:below 2067:Kelly 2030:Bkell 1677:Stan 1199:, OR 1075:Taivo 1039:Taivo 908:kwami 653:: --> 384:: --> 380:: --> 379:: --> 82:pedia 68:pedia 53:pedia 2487:talk 2303:talk 2206:talk 2198:here 2171:talk 2034:talk 1946:here 1927:; or 1882:talk 1796:talk 1705:talk 1687:talk 1671:talk 1648:talk 1636:Stan 1630:talk 1588:talk 1580:here 1562:talk 1540:talk 1508:talk 1482:) 1480:talk 1371:That 1367:Yeti 1307:talk 1281:Yeti 1258:) 1256:talk 1242:) 1240:talk 1227:and 1139:talk 1123:talk 1093:talk 1079:talk 1057:talk 1043:talk 1025:talk 949:talk 912:talk 880:talk 865:talk 846:talk 705:talk 682:talk 674:here 641:talk 610:talk 595:talk 577:and 547:talk 512:talk 410:talk 390:talk 364:talk 348:talk 322:talk 308:talk 294:talk 280:talk 264:talk 243:talk 221:talk 214:. — 193:talk 166:talk 148:talk 79:Wiki 65:Wiki 50:Wiki 2391:of 2267:On 2131:Hi, 1977:. 1759:iro 1735:Gal 1723:Man 1717:FYI 1494:AfD 1220:. 898:at 629:Man 622:Man 210:to 2568:: 2522:. 2489:) 2442:. 2425:. 2312:A 2305:) 2255:}} 2208:) 2200:. 2173:) 2149:, 2118:) 2036:) 2012:. 1986:{{ 1956:}} 1950:{{ 1923:) 1884:) 1802:) 1798:• 1752:He 1707:) 1689:) 1673:) 1650:) 1632:) 1590:) 1564:) 1542:) 1510:) 1502:. 1389:). 1338:do 1309:) 1195:, 1141:) 1125:) 1095:) 1081:) 1059:) 1045:) 1027:) 951:) 914:) 882:) 867:) 848:) 707:) 684:) 643:) 612:) 597:) 549:) 514:) 412:) 392:) 366:) 350:) 324:) 310:) 296:) 282:) 266:) 245:) 195:) 187:-- 168:) 150:) 2549:✗ 2485:( 2380:) 2377:☎ 2374:( 2342:) 2339:☎ 2336:( 2301:( 2204:( 2169:( 2114:( 2032:( 1880:( 1845:) 1842:☎ 1839:( 1794:( 1703:( 1685:( 1669:( 1646:( 1628:( 1586:( 1582:. 1560:( 1538:( 1506:( 1478:( 1305:( 1254:( 1238:( 1137:( 1121:( 1091:( 1077:( 1055:( 1041:( 1023:( 947:( 910:( 878:( 863:( 844:( 776:) 772:( 703:( 680:( 676:. 639:( 608:( 593:( 545:( 510:( 408:( 388:( 362:( 346:( 320:( 306:( 292:( 278:( 262:( 241:( 229:) 224:· 219:( 191:( 164:( 146:( 135:= 98:. 70:, 59:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index