User talk:David from Downunder

4166:

to create a level playing field for all American martial artists, as well as to provide an avenue for rank advancement for qualified practitoners. Having studied Shorin-ryu karate for many years I tested for and received godan rank from my instructor, a shichidan, in 1996. Thereafter I moved from Ohio to North Carolina and had no avenue for rank advancement due to my instructor's poor health and retirement from active teaching until I joined Mr. Porter's organization. Since I was by that time (2000) overseeing four schools in Ohio as well as teaching here, rank was becoming an issue for me. In the intervening years Mr. Porter has offered me promotions after examining my credentials and time in grade as well as my teaching activities and the activities of my students. He maintains detailed files on all of his members, including timelines and dates of promotion throughout each martial artist's career. This is a far cry from giving anyone any rank they want for money. Additionally, at 83 he continues to travel extensively and hold seminars for his members. The man is truly hard working and a good example to us all. For him to be disparaged as he was in the "Controversies" section was uncalled for and, moreover, libelously inaccurate.

1171:"Knowledge needs credible verifiable sources" - but, and of course feel free to correct me, I am not a "credible" source on my own life? You can verify that "NYSanDa" is "David Ross" by a phone call or an email. So once we verify I am who I am, am I not a source? As for being "notable", of course we can argue LOL but I'd suggest that much of what is written in English about the Tibetan Martial Arts (especially Lama Pai, Hop Ga and Lion's Roar) either originates or is influenced by the 50 or so articles I published in martial arts magazines in the 1990's. I spent more than a decade collecting Chinese sources (only 3 books in Chinese and less than 30 articles in magazines) and interviewing teachers associated with the lineages. Maybe that doesn't meet the "notable" standard? One still wonders how you produce "credible verifiable sources" for 16 years of my life when I look at how some apply the standards? 4170:

received their highest rankings from Porter Sensei. Judo and BJJ have had their political ups and downs (I've trained a couple of times with Royce Gracie), but they are relatively cohesive entities. The myriad karate and tae kwon do styles were crying out for some sort of umbrella unification in the United States, and Mr. Porter has provided it. We are grateful that he did. Just as an aside, I'm including this reference ("How the Masters Got Their Rank" judoinfo.com/karateranks.htm) from a respectable judo website which details how the Japanese and Okinawan budo practitioners went through their own perturbations of developing rank and the organizations for granting it. It's not a new story, and it's the same story we are living through here with the USMAA and the "controversy" Mr. Porter endures.

3760:

source to attach it to a solitary arbitrary fact (making it now an inline source.) Prior to that you incorrectly moved the source into the "External links" section, removing its status as a source for the article and relegating it to the status of further reading (all because of your erroneous claim that it it did not contain any facts that were included in the article... in response to you challenge, I provided nine matching facts from the first couple of paragraphs alone.) If you don't like the "Sources" heading (which is quite commonly found on Knowledge) then change it, but don't keep diminishing the integrity of the article by moving its content into inappropriate sections:

3310:

and "I reviewed the article and the AFP source, but, since it was listed as a general reference and had sections that generally matched in content, I removed it from its own section" - both statements make it quite clear that you do not understand the meaning of "Sources": (a) of course it isn't referenced directly - if it was, it would have been an inline reference, not a "Source", (b) so what if it generally matches in content? That is quite typically what a source does!! Finally, sure your initial edit was not a revert bit your second edit was a revert, done without consultation, which is exactly what you were complaining that I should not have done! --

3766:"Continue the character attacks"??!! All I did in my last message to you was to list the numerous factual errors you have been making to support your edits. I note that you never acknowledge them in any way. Please go ahead and get someone else to look over the discussion - you clearly cannot distinguish between a debate and a character attack. I point out what you claim to be "discrepancies" are not discrepancies at all", point out that you are wrong when you defended your removal of that link from that section by asserting that general sources cannot be listed as such unless all the facts contained in the source are included in the article, etc, etc. -- 3785:

editor, I don't need you following my comments around and posting. My argument wasn't to remove the AFP article from the list of references, but rather to push you into doing some checking on it because you reverted my edits. Had you simply moved the AFP article back from the "External links" into the "References" section on your first edit, there would have been no problem. My issue has only ever been that you reverted all of my edits because you "didn't have time", which I don't feel is a valid argument. Whether it's an edit or a revert, you should take some time to look and see why the edit was made, rather than revert 4-5 edits to fix 1.

3562:

sources you pointed out, it states that inline citations should be used to help if facts in the document are protested (such as this long string of arguments). With your previous information, I've added an inline citation for the AFP article for you. In the future, please just take the time to review an edit an make the appropriate change rather than undoing. I can understand doing a revert on vandalism, copyright violations, or other specific changes, but the time you've taken now has far surpassed what a simple review and comment could have fixed at the beginning. Also, your tone and arguments have been somewhat

1137:

the Chan Tai San one). And, yes, I do find it silly that you want me to cite a reference to the fact I trained with Chan Tai San (you'd imagine the 16 years I spent with him, my many appearances with him at public events around the nation, my appearance with him in the magazine articles, and the many pictures of me with him would suffice?) or that I started boxing at age 8. Seeing as I am the person who is being discussed, do I have the right to request the entire entry be removed so that I can avoid being subjected to the whims of editors such as yourself?

1821:"You should avoid linking to a website that you own, maintain or represent, even if the guidelines otherwise imply that it should be linked. If the link is to a relevant and informative site that should otherwise be included, please consider mentioning it on the talk page and let neutral and independent Knowledge editors decide whether to add it. This is in line with the conflict of interest guidelines." (this one pretty much rules you out, unless you received good consensus to go ahead.) 851: 2232:, so in terms of display there's not any difference. A bot checking raw page text won't notice that similarity, though, unless it's looking for it. If I had to guess, the "vandal" redirect was made so people wouldn't have so much to remember when reporting vandals -- can't say for sure, though, it's been here longer than I have. ;) I generally prefer to use userlinks in other contexts, though. – 3105:. For example, I recently removed a talk page comment because it asked how to escape half guard. Look at most talk pages and you will see a history (sometimes archived) of all issues discussed, including the resolved issues - else stuff is more likely to get re-hashed. The talk page history this also acts as documentation backing decisions made about the article's content. Thanks. 4263: 3030:"Not what the reference says"? I'm sick of the disgusting bias on MMA fighters pages due to fans of theirs being wiki addicts and making the pages whatever they feel like. During the HDnet dub of DREAM 1 Frank Trigg made those comments, so unless you can turn back time and change what Frank said, I'm afraid my point is valid, I'll be reverting the page now. 3366:"If you can show me overlap, I'm more than happy to add it back as a source. If you can find where to put inline citations, we can add as a reference." (Source is one option, reference is the other). If there is a single fact, let's add it in as an inline citation. If we can't find the fact, then it shouldn't be mentioned as a source/reference/citation. 3293:

missing these citations, let me know). I reviewed the article and the AFP source, but, since it was listed as a general reference and had sections that generally matched in content, I removed it from its own section. As for the edits, my change wasn't an undo, which is why I didn't open a discussion. Had you moved the AFP line from external-: -->

3744:<-I'm still trying to find something about the "Sources" heading. I see one for "Notes" (inline) and "References" (general), but don't see anything about "Sources" in the style guidelines. Is it on another page? Also, if you continue with character attacks, I will recommend having someone else look over the discussion. 2701:/ (US). I hope that was rendered correctly: the American version should include a velarized "dark" L after the central vowel. In American English, this word is not homophonous with 'homes'. I take you at your word that they are homophonous in UK English, but this is irrelevant to the article on House. — 1153:

that an article about you be deleted. However, I'd welcome it because as far as I am concerned, you are not notable. (4) You are being rude again - I do not have "whims"... I am merely following Knowledge guidelines and helping you improve those articles. I do so consistently not whimsically. Cheers. --

3398:

You require a lot of reasons to remove an unused reference =) The only unsourced/uncited section is the Treatment heading. The first discrepancy is with the size of tumor that can be removed (the wiki article says soft and small, while the AFP article says small or large). The second is an absence of

3292:

The edit you reverted was for moving "Lipoma Excision by Gohar A. Salam, in American Family Physician. March 1, 2002." to the external links section and for changing the heading "Notes" to "References". The American Family Physician source has no inline citations that I can see now, or before (if I'm

2689:

We have no idea how Sherlock Holmes wants his named pronounced. I don't know enough about UK English to say with certainty that its conventional pronunciation has not changed in the past hundred years. House is an American show, written by and for Americans, and performed in American English. That is

1345:

I have a friend in New Zealand who once told me that he always takes an instant and automatic dislike to everyone he meets, and then occasionally warms to them. It is still playing nice to ask the person to state exactly what their objection is without running around doing a lot of edits. It's not an

1224:

Hi! In fact my father gave himself a TRS-80 in 1982!!! I was only 6 years-old then... He was a Computer Engineer and he was trying to use some home-computers... He had to sell the computer shortly after that, but I was fascinated just to sit besides him while he was programming the machine... In 1989

944:

I am new to Knowledge, but that name rings a bell. I looked at his talk page and only saw issues for one day (12 March 2007). This BJJ-versus-Judo thing is quite bizarre. It's like a religious war. The Gracies' many claims are quite bizarre. Like Helio's "never defeated" claim. And I just buried his

4165:

The contention in the original "Controversies" section, that anyone can buy whatever rank he wants from Porter, was particularly galling to me, and I'm sure to others like me who may have seen it. I have 35 years experience in the martial arts and am a member of Porter's USMAA, which he established

4161:

I'm Soothsayer12 and I initiated the request that the Philip Porter article be reviewed in light of the "Controversies" section which had been added. Thank you for looking into this. I'm sure that to a Judoka, Porter's acceptance of a 10th dan from his own organization is controversial and I truly

3698:

It's clear that you still do not understand the difference in purpose between an inline citation (normally files under 'Notes' or 'References') and a general source (filed under 'Sources'). Now you have put that source back in by attaching it rather randomly to one non-contentious fact, ignoring the

3561:

They do make a difference in how a reference can be cited; however, both methods are called references. There is no difference between the use of the word "source" or "reference". Whether they are cited inline or at the bottom of the document doesn't change the term. Now, in the section of WP:Citing

3526:

Yes, for example, (a) you claimed that you could not find a single fact in the source that was also in the article - I provided nine facts just from the fist couple of paragraphs; (b) your argument that what you call "a third citation is not required has so many flaws in it I can't be bothered going

3269:

You seem to have your terminology mixed up. Also, you first sentence above mixes singular and plural so it really doesn't make any sense, especially as you are not stating which articles you are referring to - so could you please specify exactly what articles you are referring to so I can understand

3044:

After going through what you wrote there, let me just say one thing: If you're going to accuse me of something, be sure of it before you do. You brought up what someone wrote in my talk page once, I removed it for good reason, it was wrong. He assumed I had written something (I didn't, I reverted it

2540:

page, and basically ask for assistance in rebuilding the article from scratch. I think that your hatchet-stubbing is, while not the wrong thing to have done, it is also not a long-term solution. The page cannot stay as a sub-stub, and it cannot really be reverted back to the unsourced page that it

2369:

Thanks for looking into my issue. I downloaded Firefox some days ago and liked some aspects of it (a much better text search, for example), but there was one major drawback. I find it very helpful to edit using multiple browser windows. However, in Firefox, pressing ctrl-N opens a new browser window

1840:

People can Google "judo videos" where they will see that they can access videos from judoinfo, judovision, youtube in the top few hits. If a judo video site that was better than yours were to be created in the future, Googling would have it to the top of the list, whereas by putting judovision links

1152:

David... (1) you really need to get a grip on how Knowledge works. Of what use is *my* assertion that you are you? Please understand that Knowledge needs credible verifiable sources. I am not such a source. (2) I never asked you cite such a reference. (3) You can ask, but you have no right to demand

707:

indicates that more often than not, there are no spaces between the digits. As for the decoration issue, that sentence was not trying to describe judo scoreboards, it was merely describing how wazari/yuko/koka are displayed - not a good reason to remove something due to incompleteness. You can add a

4234:

Thank you Felipe... but it is all of us who should be thanking you! I see we have quite a few things in common: you just had a four month break and I just logged in after seven months; judo; BJJ; Delphi; C#; and I used to own a Fiat 124 Sports (the sexy looking 1969 model!). We will surely meet one

4218:

Hi man! You went to great pains to copy-edit the Maeda article! I've put a lot of effort on the article to make it complete but then, shortly after it was promoted to GA grade I couldn't stand anymore working that much time in wikipedia... I had to do a wikibreak!!! It's nice to see that people are

3499:

Serious cognitive issues? Not very Wikipedian of you =). If we started sourcing articles that have single facts that are the same, the "source" lists for articles would be endless. The facts you described above are also found in the other two referenced articles, and therefore don't require a third

3351:

Well, a source doesn't need to have sections that generally match either: it just needs to contain one or more facts used in the article. Re "I don't see a reason to have it listed as either"... either what? Your writing is very difficult to comprehend, and you STILL haven't replied as to which two

3309:

Well, you still didn't reply as to which two articles have "contradictory evidence". You state "the undo I feel was unnecessary since I had a reason for moving the information" but your statements "The reason I moved the link to the external list is that it isn't referenced anywhere in the article"

3235:

I recall adding that source myself, I should have added it as an inline reference given its narrow focus. Yes, my reverts changed other things as well but I can't afford time to pick through every edit needs reverting to save any possibly worthwhile potions. Also the fact that the two articles have

3220:

I'm not arguing that it potentially shouldn't be a source, but your revert made other changes. Moving the said link from the "external sources" to the "references" heading would have been preferable to the blanket undo. I've also read over the article, and the reference (both are fairly short), and

3189:

page was for. I agree that external links and sources should be kept separate, but your revert made other changes that could have been fixed in one edit (removal of some links, edit of heading). The reason I moved the link to the external list is that it isn't referenced anywhere in the article. If

776:

Sorry for the late reply. No, I didn't think that they were doing it to give the appearance of widespread celebrity support for BJJ - I think they just want to disrupt WP and the BJJ thing was just a running gag: something that might be a bit preposterous. As the info is unsourced, it can simply be

4169:

Furthermore, the head of the black belt masters' council in the USMAA is Fuse Kisei, 10th dan in Okinawan Shorin-ryu karate on Okinawa. Therefore I feel that my rank is completely valid, and I am only one a great many American martial artists, many quite well-known, who are USMAA members and have

3720:

The time taken here has been out of proportion simply due to the huge number of errors in comprehension and reasoning that you have made, to which you have now added another: "it states that inline citations should be used to help if facts in the document are protested (such as this long string of

3336:

That was a typo, I meant that the two did not have sections that generally matched. If you can show me overlap, I'm more than happy to add it back as a source. If you can find where to put inline citations, we can add as a reference. However, as it is now, I don't see a reason to have it listed as

3081:

I removed the discussion on Aoki's page since it was complete and you put it back claiming that it is not acceptable to blank a page except under special circumstances? You're the first I've heard that from since talk pages in the past have often been blanked. Explain under what circumstances they

1198:

stop wasting our time and just go and read the guidelines so that you can finally gain an understanding of what "credible source" means as well as gain an understanding of the rest of the guidelines?! As to your claim to notability, I suggest you make it a lot more clear in your article. Regarding

1193:

No, you are *not* a credible source on your life (a) not even if you could prove to Knowledge that you are David A Ross, and (b) even less so by proving it to me. I have no doubt you are who you say you are, but what I think is irrelevant. Why is is it so difficult for you to understand that? Just

1136:

Here's an idea! You can verify (even cite) that I am in fact David Ross by contacting me. I am indeed to founder and owner of NY San Da (www.NYSanDa.com) and you can call me one afternoon at 212 239 8619 or email me at info@nysanda.com. As a matter of fact, I am not responsible for that entry (NOR

423:

I also did a search and deleted all references to www.bjj.eu.com on wikipedia. The list of 'future' events, for example, contained very little on BJJ, and it was a user-updated list containing entries that were *all* in the past, not the future. I just saw it as a poor site/reference and possibly

334:

Yes, the undo function is nice for fixing a single vandalism edit, but in case a vandal has done several edits in a row, or several different users vandalized it gets unusable. In that case simply pick the last good version in the editing history, then press "Edit this page" (note you will see the

40:

Hi, I have no doubt that Eric made the statement you added to Albert's article ("The greatest guitarist in the world") I agree with him 100%, but do you have a source for this statement please? It won't fly for long unless it's sourced. Iv'e done a search but I can't find anything. Where does this

4101:

As for being an anon, why wouldn't an anon know 2-bits about wikipedia? They still haven't implemented the much debated policy to ban anons from editing, that has been discussed since atleast 4 years ago. So, is there a point to having an account, besides when you need to move pages or request an

4097:

AfD does what AfD does, which is not necessarily compliant with what should happen. However, PROD can't do that, and RfD just about always rejects efforts to delete edit histories. So if you still want to delete it, bring it to AfD, as RfD will probably reject you. But it is still a likely search

2393:

According to the doco, Alt+Enter is supposed to do that in Firefox. I couldn't get it to work until I tried clicking on the URL edit control first (or you can press CTRL+L then ALT+Enter). But it doesn't have any history. Why don't you report it to the development team as a desirable feature. The

597:

My reverting your addition of a source was accidental, I was just reverting the addition of an unsourced example (hence the edit summary). Unfortunately, I guess in between the time I opened my watchlist and got to the revert you had added a source for another example which I missed, so my revert

3784:

So you are saying that the statements "You have serious cognitive issues" and "I've never seen such a series of errors in fact and logic from an editor" are not character attacks? Those two lines to be somewhat more than simple discussion. Also, when all I'm doing is asking for help from another

3759:

The distinction between inline sources (often seen under the heading Notes or Footnotes or References) and general sources (often seen under the heading Sources or References) is the distinction I have been trying to get you to see - it's the one you have blurred by moving that article's general

4011:

You reverted my insertion of a PROD template in the article Dong Sik Yoon with the reason "(rm PROD - violation of GFDL)" - could you please explain why you did that and what violation of GFDL are you claiming? (I have reverted your edit.) -- David from Downunder (talk) 13:19, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

3060:

The version you reverted it to was totally unacceptable according to encyclopedic standards, and it was the same version for which the other editor received a block for reverting to it a number of times. Whether you wrote those words or reverted to them is irrelevant... it was still your edit.

1900:

In personal experience, and I feel this applies to all people reading an article, when I read about a Judoka winning X consecutive world or olympic championships, my first thought is 'wow, I wonder what that must have looked like in action'.. Judokas like Koga, Nomura, Geesink, Ruska, Douillet,

1806:

which states "Any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a Featured article." The article is meant to provide information about the topic, and external links are meant to provide additional information not included in the article. I don't

3205:

Originally, Knowledge only had Sources, and no inline references. Inline references are certainly preferable, but 'Sources' are still valid and widespread in Knowledge. Yes, it would be much better to change any 'Source' to one or more inline references, but that is a massive task and it is no

1910:

Regarding 6 other video sites: All have some videos, but none have the amount, and the detail (fighters in the clip, wich exact tournament) as Judovision, only when they have copied the information ;) Reason why I mention that, is that none of them are able to add specific links for specific

573:

You didn't mention Radio 2, so I was just looking up the Jonathan Ross show episodes listed at IMDB.com and of course it wasn't listed. Anyway, the quote from that show doesn't show that Merchant is an atheist, just that he is "not religious", so I still think it shouldn't be reinstated.

2715:

This is the wrong place to discuss the article: that is what the article's talk page is for. Re your statement "We have no idea how Sherlock Holmes wants his named pronounced" - well, as he is a fictional character, you have to assume it is as per normal English pronunciation. The English

3424:

Your various comments including "The American Family Physician source has no inline citations that I can see now, or before (if I'm missing these citations, let me know)" makes it clear that you do not know what a 'Source' is - if it had inline citations, the it would be under 'Notes' or

3254:

used as an inline references, so the fact that they have contradictory evidence is relevant. While picking through edits is somewhat time consuming, my edit was made in good faith, and I believe with adequate reason, to at least merit a discussion prior to a blanket revert.

1082:

Think this one may run on, they won't admit they might be in the wrong. Please tell me if I was over doing it, calling it vandalism was the wrong way to go and (while it could be argued as true) just made it worse. Other then that I think I've been patient, no throwing the

2766:

He's definitely no troll - I'm sure he wants to have a third go at it: kill all the Jews, homosexuals, Australians, and especially British comedians. He probably goes to sleep every night listening to Wagner with a picture of Herr Wolf under his pillow. Up the Brits!

3885:

David, I believe I made one edit and one revert, you have made three reverts. Four reverts will draw a block under normal circumstances but this article is under probation and rules are stiffer. Please self-revert pending an outcome of the ongoing discussion. Thanks.

2783:

Ach du lieber! There's gratitude for you. Overthrew their totalitarian regime for them and set up a democratic government in its place, and not even a thank you. Next time we should just sit back and watch the Russians stomp them into the dirt. I was going to go see

2720:

relevant because the name 'House' was chosen as a tribute to the English detective 'Sherlock Holmes'. I just asked an American about it who only left the USA a few weeks ago: he pronounces both words the same. Listen to the American pronunciation of the two words in

1199:

your reference as to how some apply the standards, so what? I am not a policeman - you are perfectly free to edit any page in Knowledge and apply the standards as you understand them and do a better job - but please again an understanding of them first. Thanks --

1763:

I was referred to you by Daniel Case, as you are active in the Martial Arts wiki's.. A couple of weeks ago I posted a question in the Martial Arts section, asking if it was ok if I added external links at Judoka profiles on Wiki to videos of them in action.

1449:

He is not worthy of my dislike. As the French guard said in the Holy Grail... "I don't wanna talk to you no more, you empty headed animal food trough wiper! I fart in your general direction! Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!"

57:(who also happened to have been my high school English teacher 36 years ago.) I sent an email to the paper asking for a source, but have not received a reply. It is also widely quoted on the internet. Thanks for the feedback - I see that you've deleted it. 335:

warning "This is an old revision of this page..." at top) and save it with a fitting editing comment. Admin users have another function named "rollback" which can undo several consecutive edits of a single user/IP in a row. For the full description see

1818:"Links should be kept to a minimum." (this is relevant because (a) does it really add to the article (as per my comment above), and (b) if judovision was to be included then by the same argument, so could judoinfo, youtube and google videos as well.) 3294:

references, I wouldn't have complained, but the undo I feel was unnecessary since I had a reason for moving the information. If you can let me know where in the article the inline information should be, I would be more than happy to put it back in.

3721:

arguments)" - this long lien of arguments is not about a protested fact, it is about your wrongful edit and the unsound reasoning behind it. So then... quote for me which "protested fact" in the article this "long string of arguments" is about! --

703:

at random" means? Spacing between digits is not of any significance. This is particularly so, given that spectators are advised to read the score as if it was a three-digit number for simple comparison of who's ahead. In any case, a Google image

28:

I like to keep both sides of my discussions together, so if you leave me a message here, I will reply here. If I left a question on your talk page, please reply there; I'm watching your page so I will get back to you as soon as possible. Thanks!

1194:

stop and THINK about it for a moment: Knowledge would be a complete farce if it allowed anyone to create a page about themselves and were allowed to write whatever they liked because they must be a credible source about themselves! Would you

3807:

Statements like "My issue has only ever been that..." are patently false. You had a number of issues and arguments, which I refuted on matters of fact and of logic. I am not going to waste any more time with your revisionist arguments.

2560:

Wenn ist dass Nunnstrruck grritt undt Shlotermyer? Jaah, Beierhund dass oder die Flipperwaldt gersput! ... ??? ... !!! -- BWAAAAAAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAHAAAAA...URRRGHHHH!!! (German dies of deadly joke secret weapon of the British service)

1881:

Hi David, thank you for your response. Just to clarify, I would not be adding 'general' links which would be similar to a googling the term Judo Videos. I would add a link only showing specific fights for the judoka in the relevant

1381:

P.s. I notice Vapor hasn't got back to us but he is online as he was just all sniffy over a mistake with AWB, I think it may be time to return to the classic British past time of being scrupulously polite to people you dislike :D

1225:

he bought us a MSX computer, and give it to me, his older child... That changed my world completely... MSX was a great standard and a superb machine to learn programming... Today I own my live to MSX. Hail MSX!!! Regards...

949:.) I am continually coming up against BJJers who think that the techniques they are using were invented by the Gracies, so I inform them that it's an old Judo technique... and tell them the name in Japanese for good measure. 777:

deleted. They now have matching info in IMBD about her practicing BJJ, but it appears that IMDB is just publishing unsupported claims from someone with a hotmail address - probably the same person who put the info in WP. --

1773:

The 'Issue' is, that all links will by to te same site (Judovision), and I dont want it to be considered Spam. As the video material is an extremely valuable addition to the articles, and cannot be included any other way.

3535:- the source you removed, as I have been telling you all along, is one that falls into the category of "books or other sources that support a significant amount of the material in the article". P.S. Are you a doctor? -- 3399:

information in the AFP article about the ultrasonic method of removal. Do you have a section that the AFP article applies to? Or a fact? If so, let's add it back in. If not, then why are we having this discussion?

680:

a string of three digits. While they often are, obviously there are variations, and more to the point there is almost always decoration indicating what score is what. Would you describe the scoreboards shown at

1901:

Yamashita etc cannot be described as well as a video would. Thats why I feel that such links will provide that bit of extra information in an encyclopaedic sense, that cannot be added to an article any other way.

4326:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 3629:: there is no requirement that source can only be quoted if it backs up every fact mentioned in the article - that would be quite silly. The fact that the source does not mention ultrasound is quite immaterial. 557:

claiming that the Dec 24th 2005 edition of Jonathan Ross on Radio 2 doesn't exist. What makes you think it doesn't exist? Jonathan Ross's show was presented by Ricky Gervais that week, as Ross was on holiday.

2977:

past the final warning you've given out already I'll block, and will probably then block the account indef as well, as that would have been the route I'd have taken if he'd made the IP edits whilst logged

754:

biography. Was it your impression that someone was trying to insert fictitious info into WP to create the appearance of widespread celebrity support for BJJ? If so, it may be worth checking with people at

675:

I see you've put the sentence about electronic scoreboards back into the judo page. The reason I removed it was because it was unclear and incomplete. The way it's phrased implies that the scoreboard is

3270:

what you are trying to tell me? Lastly, I do not need to instigate a discussion before reverting any more than you need to before reverting my original edits that added the two inline references and the

1594:

On a similar note you may want to leave Tenteisai's edit for a while, he's heading for a ban unless he calms down but you don't want to hit the electric fence by accident when an admin looks into it. --

3206:

justification for moving a valid 'Source' to the 'External links' section. Read up on the purpose of 'External links' and you will see why they should not necessarily all be lumped together. Thanks. --

1891:

It is my opinion that such links do provide additional information, that cannot be included in the article. Same as a picture says more than a thousand words, the same (and more so) applies to videos.

3974:

That article is looking very good now, it's nice to work as apart of a team that is all pulling in the same direction I've spent far too long in acrimonious alternative medicine tarpits recently!

1240:

Those very very early days. The first computer I used was an IBM mainframe with optical sense card input. Job turnaround time was two days. That was in 1973. The first microcomputer I used was an

1681:

I think you should remove your GFE comment on the refdesk. We don't bite over there. A Google search would leave the average person pretty confused about what to call a bunch of pigs, anyway. --

3989:

Yes. Thanks for all your great edits. Altmed! I'm like a 6.9 on that (using Richard Dawkins scale of disbelief.) Mostly junk, but I am not, however, a member of the quackwatch congregation! --

2569:) 17:19, 8 April 2008 (UTC) Aahchtunk, Aahchtunk, Attention, pazzengerrss off ze Luffthanzza, rready forr takeoff!! All pazzengerrss close ze seat belts, and I vant to hearr only vone CLICK!!! 1855:

I did link to an MMA video on YouTube once because it provided the only proof of a fight's outcome - the information was not listed in the official records that were being cited by Knowledge.

3614:(a) "The first discrepancy is with the size of tumor that can be removed (the wiki article says soft and small, while the AFP article says small or large)" - as I pointed out to you before, 2257:

I haven't done any reverts today but will have a look around, if it hasn't been black listed yet it's only a matter of time & then I can have fun doing a AWB run to get rid of it :D --

4021:

you are not allowed to reimplement PROD on things that have had prods removed, for :whatever reason. They must be sent to AfD. In this case, since it is now a redirect, it needs to go to

3918:

I have reverted a requested. My three reverts were not the same reverts. Things progresses during that time. Nearly all of my first revert was maintained by other editors. Sleep well! --

722:

I see you have already expanded the scoreboard info a few days ago. Thanks. I have moved it to a new section, and re-introduced the electronic example together with the print example. --

1954:

links to the relevant video should be fine, but it would be better to embed the videos if the copyright on each one allowed. Also including them as references would look better to me.--

1029: 2846:

Nay probs, laddie, as I'd say if I were Scottish. Won't be making 500 today anyway: trawling the Times was easy, but LexisNexis for all newspapers is bringing up too much junk. Cheers!

2501:

I have that option too, but that option is for what to do when starting up Firefox, not what to do when opening a new tab (or a new window.) Added to the fact that it doesn't work! --

2169:. Also it has the problem of either always remaining a one line section, or inviting more video links which are probably not desirable. Modifying your second example, I prefer this: 920:

Hopefully they will get bored, as there are 3+ people fixing it, next step would be semi-protection, in the hope that frustrates them long enough to give up, but if you remember the

159:

Crikey! I was just joking! Oh well, now we can say that 'It is on record that it's widely quoted that Clapton is on record as saying Lee is "the greatest guitarist in the world".'

3143: 996:

is titled "WORLD CLASS BRAZILIAN JIU JITSU TOURNEMENT FEATURING BARRY LEY" - wow, a "world class" blue belt and his "best-selling" book! And he has shocking taste in music too! --

2056:

Can you just do one or two representative pages first and wait to get some feedback from Nate and me? It might save some time if either of us has any suggestions as to style. --

3652:

After me pointing out to you all the errors in reasoning that you made in your decision to remove that link from the 'Sources' section, how can you still stand by that decision?

4162:

respect that point of view. I think that it is important to remember that all of Porter's previous ranks in judo, up to and including Kudan, came from sanctioned authorities.

2533: 2374:, rather than the page I was looking at (which is what my current browser opens). This I find most unhelpful. Do you know offhand how I can make Firebox open another window 3450:<-As to your claim that the source I provided didn't have any facts that match the article, I found the following facts that match in the first several sentences alone: 3045:

to what it was before since that was closer to reality) and you try to use that in order to make me sound bad and somehow expect people not to trash talk you? Get a life.

875:

process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also

4277: 3001: 3504:

has no mention to a separation of 'Source' versus 'Reference', if you can point me to the location where this differentiation is made I will definitely look over it.

1032:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 1505:

You're getting your arts muddled, it was on jujutsu; I noticed it just now, why oh why do some people feel they have to click a random button after clicking edit. --

3101:

where it refers to "No personal attacks", "No insults", and "do not edit others' comments". Examples of when it is OK to remove talk page comments are given here:

2614:

No, there's definitely something wrong with you... you've failed to recognise one of Basil's best German put-downs: "Oh, German. I'm sorry, I thought there was

2746:

Saw some of it yesterday, It all most looks like trolling being that offended, though I would have suggested a wiki link to the sketch just for education... --

2541:

was previously. So the only remaining option that I see is to try to get some fresh faces in to try to rebuild it from scratch, properly sourced this time. -

3500:

citation. As far as your other argument, a source is any article you get information from and the term is interchangeable with reference. The style guideline

2180:

But what about Nate's input? Nate, I couldn't really understand what you were suggesting. Maybe you could modify an article to demonstrate what you mean. --

3856:

as you are editing an article under article probation in a tendentious manner. Please self-revert and contribute to the ongoing discussion. Thank you. --

3133: 229: 3602:

It didn't contain any facts that were used in the article. I listed nine of them for you - you claimed there were none. As I pointed out to you before,

1244:

that I chose for the university I was working at in 1979-1980. You owe your life to the MSX? Heck, I couldn't even get mine to make me a cup of tea! --

822:

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, David Broadfoot! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply

3531:

doesn't differentiate between the two different sourcing styles is further evidence of your problem: read this paragraph (it's only three sentences):

3163: 4102:

AfD? Everything else doesn't require you to log on, so there's no point in logging on, unless you're nominating an article to AfD, or renaming one.

2394:

other features I like are the on-the-fly spell-checker and the option after a crash of re-opening all the URLs that were open before the crash. --

192:

Iv'e seen statements linked to far more tenuous sources. If it's challenged, we'll have to try and come up with Eric's original statement. Cheers!

1920:

Thank you very much for your answer! I hope Nate1481 will come back with his thoughts too (and maybe I convinced you a bit with this extra info)..

526: 3236:

contradictory evidence is not really relevant - they are each used as inline references to support corresponding statements in the article. --

282: 4351: 2973:

must have got overlooked when someone else changed the page, so I may not have seen it. In any event, if there's continued disruption from

2634: 2600: 2570: 2562: 1087:

and leaving the article largely alone and trying to talk to them. I seem to be left with the unplesent prospect this may turn into another

3566:

and inappropriate at points of this discussion, simply for my recommendation to remove what I initially considered an unnecessary source.

3082:

should be removed and why leaving that there would serve any purpose since I doubt anyone will be looking to cite anything I brought up.

4034:

the contents of this page into the other page, you are in violation of GFDL by proposing to delete the edit history of the merged data.

3158: 2671: 2466:

Fiddle. My version has 'windows & tabs form last time', Try having a look thought the add-ons, chances are someone has created it.--

1346:

issue of politeness, it's an issue of efficiency. Look at the words written... most of them are by you and me. Learn from Barry Ley. --

685: 1290:

made no amendments and demanded explanation only, I wouldn't even provide the demanded citations even though I know where to find them.

296: 2916:

Probably off-line or giving him a chance to prove us wrong after the block (second is unlikely but not unreasonable). We will see --

2314:

Feel better now, you self-righteous, god-boxing, bible-thumping, hypocritical stone-age confidence trickster? (Hey! It does work!) --

101:. We could always say 'It's widely quoted that Clapton is on record as saying Lee is "the greatest guitarist in the world".' !! 2440:

Thanks, but that only gives you the option of a static page, or nothing. Nick wants to open another copy of the page he is on. --

74:

Hi David, a source from any reliable internet site will be fine. Please feel free to reinsert, it's a really great quote! Cheers,

4295: 4042: 3168: 1111:

Replaced that bit as I'd rather archive the whole lot together when it's over, i will copy it all to the article talk though. --

883:). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Knowledge or discuss the relevant issues at 4347: 3221:

can't seem to find much relation between the two of them, to the extent of the two article even having contradictory evidence.

898: 876: 336: 4203: 3102: 3098: 2925: 2883: 2755: 2475: 2422: 2266: 1963: 1603: 1514: 1391: 1327: 1277: 1120: 1100: 983: 933: 660: 641: 538: 506: 482: 454: 413: 393: 361: 308: 1292:

Trolls love to tie you in knots with debate - like claiming that your edits justified their original argument, etc, etc. --

275:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out

3762:

that link is a general source for that article - it's not an inline source for one fact, and it's not just further reading.

95:

None of the internet sites quote their source - they are probably just parroting each other anyway. Here is the article by

3153: 3020: 3016: 1714:

If it will make you feel better, you can come over to my talk page and chew a few inches off my tail whenever you want. --

256: 529:

and the apropreate sub page (linked @ the top). Think I've twinkled away most of his links (it allows 1 click reverts) --

3673:

Then there was your claim that he style guideline has no mention to a separation of 'Source' versus 'Reference' - also

241: 4338:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

4343: 872: 708:

subsection on judo scoreboards if you like, but you'd have to avoid being too specific. Whereabouts in Oz are you? --

441:

Fair enough make seance to me, sam reason I try to link all the arts on the MA page lists, unfortunately next passing

3138: 2633:

O godogodogod. Now I see. Why is the damn Temazepam article all only about the forensics in some hicktown Glasgow?

827: 823: 816: 99: 4273: 4236: 4128: 4072: 3990: 3948: 3919: 3872: 3809: 3767: 3722: 3536: 3483: 3426: 3385: 3353: 3311: 3279: 3237: 3207: 3106: 3062: 2944: 2899: 2856: 2829: 2818: 2768: 2727: 2652: 2619: 2585: 2502: 2441: 2395: 2281: 2181: 2057: 1864: 1737: 1697: 1646: 1553: 1472: 1418: 1347: 1293: 1249: 1204: 1158: 1025: 1001: 957: 831: 782: 727: 713: 613: 579: 261: 1841:

across multiple articles, there would be the issue have having to edit every article to link to the better site.

3532: 3528: 3501: 3148: 3012: 2811:

I was just trying to make it to 500 today. Let me know when you're done, I've got another big one for No. 500.

1021: 974:

etc. one of them went round trying to revert every edit I'd made, just after I'd done an AWB clean up run... --

2638: 2604: 2599:

No, but after you mentioned 1914 and 1939 I thought I contribute these nice 2 Monty Python and German jokes.

2574: 2566: 1863:

is a good person to get an opinion from. I think that he monitors this page, so let's see what he thinks. --

3938: 3909: 3891: 3861: 2675: 689: 2871: 1264:

I did wonder, but as I felt he was being largely irrational, and it might actually remove it objections, I

750:

discussion page, I noticed that some of the unsourced (and possibly fake) BJJ info had crept back into the

705: 4178: 4046: 3621:(b) "The second is an absence of information in the AFP article about the ultrasonic method of removal" - 3421:, there is no requirement that *all* facts in the source must be quoted in the article - just one or more. 2726:

There is no appreciable difference in pronunciation (apart from having two different-sounding voices.) --

2698: 2694: 2546: 1803: 1028:. I do not feel that this article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at 236: 225: 378: 3482:

so I am totally puzzled as to how you could not find any and ask me to provide even a "single fact". --

2383: 2242: 835: 268: 4174: 608:

I see. Thank you. Need to be careful - the wiki does warn about such conflicts when you try to save. --

469:

You mentioned on the BJJ talk page you were looking into it's evolution. One of the other contributors

4269: 4255: 1471:

P.S. Lucky I looked back past your Aikido edit... someone crapped a test gallery all over the page. --

4291: 4284: 4224: 4194:

History/orign edit war, any help in keep getting a vaguely neutral version up would be appreciated --

3979: 3833: 2852: 2814: 2793: 2785: 2355: 2337: 2319: 2305: 1719: 1686: 1245: 1230: 1200: 1154: 997: 953: 884: 880: 778: 723: 709: 609: 575: 425: 320: 272: 160: 102: 58: 3008: 2974: 4339: 4276:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 3786: 3745: 3567: 3505: 3400: 3367: 3338: 3296: 3256: 3222: 3191: 3083: 3046: 3031: 2537: 2525: 2271: 1068: 921: 751: 740: 599: 276: 2125:

Does that look ok, and which one would you prefer? All suggestions you have are more than welcome!

1768: 1172: 1138: 4064: 3934: 3933:

as any revert counts and your reverts were of essentially the same material anyway. Take care. --

3905: 3900:

David, it is late and I am going to bed. Since you have not responded I am going to post this to

3887: 3857: 3790: 3749: 3571: 3563: 3509: 3472:

can be treated with a variety of procedures ranging from ... injections to excision of the tumor.

3404: 3371: 3342: 3300: 3260: 3226: 3195: 3171: 3087: 3050: 3035: 2706: 2226: 1037: 801: 765: 684:(an example picked largely at random), with obviously separated boxes for each score, as "110"? 340: 251: 232:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: 2860: 2822: 868: 844: 2347: 2172: 2128: 2027: 1929: 1783: 1736:

Thanks... I'll bring my appetite and my BOA (Book Of Acronyms). But I might be in disguise. --

1088: 971: 850: 4315: 4306: 3190:

we want to have it as a source, we should get it put inline and have it added to the reflist.

2542: 1176: 1142: 563: 522: 349: 3054: 3039: 2983: 1690: 4335: 4319: 4068: 2981:

Incidentally, who are you describing as a very strange fellow above...me? Or Tenteisai? ;-)

2413:

Options and select the 'main' tab then you can pick what open when you open a new window. --

2379: 2234: 590: 554: 4334:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1268:. My comment was mainly trying to find out what his problem is so it could be addressed. -- 4220: 3975: 3849: 3829: 2789: 2351: 2333: 2315: 2301: 2216: 1813: 1715: 1682: 1226: 1060: 1056: 906: 632:

showing though, I for got to proof read that page arter i did it ages ago. Thanks again --

497:

I was removing the purely national ones as internationals were listed will fix it later --

470: 17: 2277:

I ran across it again... it wasn't on April 3, but was the most recent edit before that

1807:

believe that the videos provide any additional "information" in the encyclopaedic sense.

4331: 4323: 2132: 2031: 1933: 1787: 1289: 1265: 1241: 1064: 756: 193: 134: 127: 75: 42: 4355: 4300: 4244: 4228: 4208: 4182: 4136: 4080: 4050: 3998: 3983: 3942: 3913: 3895: 3880: 3865: 3837: 3817: 3794: 3775: 3753: 3730: 3627:

you are also wrong on that due to lack of understanding the use of the Sources section

3575: 3544: 3513: 3491: 3434: 3408: 3393: 3375: 3361: 3346: 3319: 3304: 3287: 3264: 3245: 3230: 3215: 3199: 3174: 3114: 3091: 3070: 2987: 2952: 2930: 2907: 2888: 2837: 2797: 2776: 2760: 2735: 2709: 2679: 2660: 2642: 2627: 2608: 2593: 2578: 2550: 2510: 2480: 2449: 2427: 2403: 2387: 2359: 2341: 2323: 2309: 2289: 2247: 2189: 2136: 2065: 2035: 1968: 1937: 1872: 1791: 1745: 1723: 1705: 1654: 1608: 1561: 1519: 1480: 1426: 1396: 1355: 1332: 1301: 1282: 1253: 1234: 1208: 1180: 1162: 1146: 1125: 1105: 1072: 1041: 1005: 988: 961: 938: 910: 838: 806: 786: 770: 731: 717: 693: 665: 646: 617: 602: 583: 567: 543: 511: 487: 459: 428: 418: 398: 366: 343: 323: 313: 196: 163: 130: 105: 78: 61: 53:

Hi Lion King... This quote recently appeared in a Sydney newspaper article written by

45: 4327: 4251: 4195: 4022: 4005: 3930: 2917: 2875: 2747: 2702: 2467: 2414: 2258: 2166: 1955: 1860: 1833: 1829: 1595: 1506: 1417:

Are you sure you're not getting your users muddled? That's Visor, not Vapour, no? --

1383: 1319: 1311: 1269: 1112: 1092: 1052: 1033: 975: 925: 891: 861: 796: 760: 652: 633: 530: 498: 474: 446: 442: 405: 385: 353: 300: 246: 3871:

Happy to discuss, but why is it OK for you to edit 11 hours ago, and not me now? --

3901: 3853: 946: 559: 295:

Saw your edits on the BJJ page and wondered it you would be interested in joining

3599:

The two reasons you gave for removing that link from the 'Sources' section were:

2788:, too, but if they're going to be like that about the whole business...sheesh. -- 2670:: Culture: Drugs, and invited the regulars for discussion on the Temazepam page. 897:

template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to

3382:

you STILL haven't replied as to which two articles have "contradictory evidence"

967: 747: 96: 54: 4262: 2828:

Just this one big copyedit and I'm done. I'm 20% of the way through. Sorry. --

2378:(and with the same history as the original window)? Thanks for the suggestion. 4067:, which went to arbitration, was it decided to merge most of its content with 994: 902: 34: 1777:

Hope you can give me your feedback on this, and preferably, back the idea :)

2667: 3677:. I've never seen such a series of errors in fact and logic from an editor. 3417:

say that only "soft and small" lipomas can be removed. Secondly, as I have

2894:

Yes, I saw that, and I immediately asked for his anon IP to be blocked too

2212:

Comments/questions tend to get removed from AIV, so I'll answer this here:

826:. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other 629: 3609:

It contained contradictions with the article. You gave, as two examples:

952:

P.S. Yes... our pressing 'undo' is a lot less work than their edits! --

2648: 2943:

No, he is/was online... he answered the thread started after mine. --

682: 4283:

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --

3186: 2329: 598:

took that out too. I have no objection to the source you provided. --

1318:

there just trying to annoy you, I was even polite to Barry Ley... --

3947:

Yeah... like I should have just waited another 25 minutes. :-) --

2898:

but no response. Very strange fellow. At least he's consistent. --

4322:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

4127:

Thanks 70.51.8.63, or whoever you happen to be at the moment! --

3278:

edit before any discussion with me... it's a two-way street!! --

3828:

Guys, I'll help out with this. Just stop sniping at each other.

2093: 2090:

Absolutely.. 2 pages with slightly different text with the link:

1847: 473:

who lives in Brazil and studies both may be able to help you. --

2098: 1769:

http://www.judovision.org/?mode=search&keyword=Ryoko%20Tani

4188: 2970: 2895: 1084: 901:, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 279:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place 3625:: it is not a contradiction, it is an omission. Furthermore, 1063:#12. Sorry but links to personal websites are to be avoided. 4063:

Well, you sure seem to know a lot for an Anon! Why then for

4018:

you are not allowed to delete edit histories of kept content

3533:

WP:Citing_sources#General_references_versus_inline_citations

3099:

Knowledge:Talk_page_guidelines#Behavior_that_is_unacceptable

3002:

Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#DemiLovato15

2808:

Please don't format while I'm adding -- we're clashing! :-p

849: 4037:

Further, it is a useful redirect, so why delete it anyways?

3618:

and you were unable to quote where the article stated that.

1846:

We have links to six judo video sites (including yours) at

993:

I did a bit of searching. What a nutter. This YouTube video

1548:

Some people are random. Speaking of randomness, how about

924:

thing that can take 6 months+ if they are very stubborn --

3413:

You have serious cognitive issues: The wiki article does

2536:, where I try to lay out my view of the situation on the 1802:

Please consider the purpose of external links stated at

1030:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of celebrity judoka

287:

before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

126:

That's perfect! I've put it in, nice one David! Cheers,

2280:. P.S. just reply to me on your talk page in future. -- 2278: 1549: 966:

Ahh looked back at the page, doesn't mention the 10ish

757:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Community_Portal

381: 3144:

List of atheists (Film, radio, television and theatre)

3457:

usually first appear between 40 and 60 years of age.

2722: 1812:

You need to also consider the Knowledge policies at

4268:An article that you have been involved in editing, 2724: 1364:

better as it's an explanation not a bald statement.

824:

download and install VandalProof from our main page

651:

Cheers for clearing that up while I was offline. --

1696:My mistake - tell me where to get a meal then. -- 759:whether more needs to be done about this. Cheers, 133:P.S. I've added Emmy's quote too - great article! 4314:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 2999: 1360:Like the re-wording & that last paragraph is 945:claim that he fought the longest fight ever (see 871:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the 4278:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Michael Parrella 3699:numerous other facts that it was used to source. 2651:needs a section about Temazepam added to it. -- 2556:Byerhundt das oder der, die Flipperwaldt gersput 521:Best thing is to request Admin help, if you use 3103:Knowledge:Talk_page_guidelines#Editing_comments 1767:For example, for Ryoko Tani the link would be: 4098:target, so why nominate it in the first place? 3274:source. Furthermore, I note that you reverted 1055:because it fails the guidelines for links per 2874:last night and got a 72 hour block for it. -- 525:its the 'arv' tab on the userpage if not its 8: 4219:taking care of things. Congrats! Good work. 3478:most often found in the subcutaneous tissues 3185:Just wanted to check what the revert on the 384:? might be legit but might need removing. -- 377:What do you make of the other link added by 3352:articles have "contradictory evidence". -- 4173:Respectfully, I thank you for your time. 3623:you are wrong on that as a matter of logic 3134:List of atheists (Activists and educators) 1051:I reverted the external link you added to 1016:AfD nomination of List of celebrity judoka 267:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 3616:you are wrong on that as a matter of fact 3604:you are wrong on that as a matter of fact 3164:List of atheists (Science and technology) 2690:the dialect with which we are concerned. 41:statement come from please? Best wishes, 3904:. Suggest you self-revert. Good nite. -- 3469:with a characteristic soft, doughy feel. 2165:The first one doesn't really conform to 1992:links, and will list them as references. 1988:Thanks for the input Nate1481, I'll add 3606:- I provided nine examples out of many. 404:Scratch that it a forum reverting....-- 3527:through them all; (c) your claim that 2584:Is there something wrong with you? -- 2094:http://en.wikipedia.org/David_Douillet 795:Okeydoke, thanks for getting back. -- 3848:Please self-revert your last edit to 3475:Lipomas are ... nearly always benign, 2870:Don't know if you saw but he blanked 2099:http://en.wikipedia.org/Udo_Quellmalz 2009:Thanks for your time and effort guys! 527:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard 7: 3159:List of atheists (Politics and law) 2412:If you have a look under Tools: --> 299:. Good edits by the was thanks! -- 25: 4340:review the candidates' statements 3929:Thanks David, FYI, please review 3425:'References', not 'Sources'. -- 2173:Videos of Udo Quellmalz in action 445:run will probably remove it... -- 224:Hello, David from Downunder, and 4261: 4071:and then delete the article? -- 3169:List of atheists (Miscellaneous) 2350:seems to like her new hairdo. -- 352:is amazingly useful for this. -- 3852:or I will be forced to ask for 2971:message from earlier this month 899:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 877:Knowledge:What Knowledge is not 830:, or you can post a message on 549:Steve Merchant on Jonathan Ross 337:Knowledge:Cleaning up vandalism 319:I just joined it. Thanks Nate. 4346:. For the Election committee, 4316:Arbitration Committee election 4307:ArbCom elections are now open! 2666:Done; However, I started with 2532:I wanted to make you aware of 1024:, an article you created, for 857:Another editor has added the " 746:Following your comment on the 367:11:38, 26 September 2007 (UTC) 344:11:16, 26 September 2007 (UTC) 1: 4356:13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 4229:04:33, 20 December 2008 (UTC) 3154:List of atheists (Philosophy) 1209:17:39, 22 February 2008 (UTC) 1181:17:24, 22 February 2008 (UTC) 1163:14:50, 22 February 2008 (UTC) 1147:14:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC) 1126:15:10, 21 February 2008 (UTC) 1106:16:15, 20 February 2008 (UTC) 1073:06:43, 17 February 2008 (UTC) 839:03:05, 31 December 2007 (UTC) 771:23:24, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 694:12:50, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 666:10:25, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 647:13:09, 21 November 2007 (UTC) 618:07:39, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 603:07:32, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 584:13:37, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 568:10:58, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 553:You deleted a reference from 324:12:48, 7 September 2007 (UTC) 314:11:49, 7 September 2007 (UTC) 237:The five pillars of Knowledge 197:14:06, 8 September 2007 (UTC) 164:00:51, 8 September 2007 (UTC) 131:15:47, 7 September 2007 (UTC) 106:15:22, 7 September 2007 (UTC) 79:13:37, 7 September 2007 (UTC) 62:10:44, 7 September 2007 (UTC) 4245:10:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC) 1550:this effort across six edits 1061:Links normally to be avoided 1042:21:01, 30 January 2008 (UTC) 1006:15:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 989:15:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 962:14:59, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 939:14:38, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 807:00:56, 23 January 2008 (UTC) 787:06:53, 20 January 2008 (UTC) 732:05:44, 8 December 2007 (UTC) 718:05:29, 8 December 2007 (UTC) 544:10:11, 30 October 2007 (UTC) 512:16:43, 17 October 2007 (UTC) 257:How to write a great article 228:to Knowledge! Thank you for 4342:and submit your choices on 2534:this noticeboard discussion 911:06:44, 1 January 2008 (UTC) 488:09:56, 5 October 2007 (UTC) 460:16:31, 2 October 2007 (UTC) 429:17:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 419:10:26, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 399:10:25, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 46:16:14, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 4371: 4348:MediaWiki message delivery 4301:14:21, 16 April 2010 (UTC) 3454:Lipomas are adipose tumors 3250:The disputed reference is 3139:List of atheists (Authors) 2798:13:41, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 2777:10:08, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 2761:08:37, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 2736:15:38, 15 April 2008 (UTC) 2710:18:59, 10 April 2008 (UTC) 2661:01:31, 10 April 2008 (UTC) 2376:of the site I'm looking at 2252: 2137:18:55, 31 March 2008 (UTC) 2066:12:54, 31 March 2008 (UTC) 2036:12:18, 31 March 2008 (UTC) 1969:20:17, 30 March 2008 (UTC) 1938:15:56, 30 March 2008 (UTC) 1873:10:52, 30 March 2008 (UTC) 1792:08:45, 30 March 2008 (UTC) 1746:15:30, 28 March 2008 (UTC) 1724:15:23, 28 March 2008 (UTC) 1706:15:20, 28 March 2008 (UTC) 1691:15:16, 28 March 2008 (UTC) 1562:15:22, 31 March 2008 (UTC) 1520:14:39, 31 March 2008 (UTC) 1481:14:31, 31 March 2008 (UTC) 1397:14:23, 31 March 2008 (UTC) 1356:14:34, 28 March 2008 (UTC) 1333:14:21, 28 March 2008 (UTC) 1302:14:04, 28 March 2008 (UTC) 1283:13:58, 28 March 2008 (UTC) 1254:05:22, 21 March 2008 (UTC) 1235:14:47, 17 March 2008 (UTC) 867:" template to the article 4209:15:14, 27 June 2008 (UTC) 3272:American Family Physician 2804:Editing while I'm adding! 2693:The difference is this: / 2643:17:48, 9 April 2008 (UTC) 2628:15:27, 9 April 2008 (UTC) 2609:08:32, 9 April 2008 (UTC) 2594:05:45, 9 April 2008 (UTC) 2579:18:09, 8 April 2008 (UTC) 2551:18:11, 7 April 2008 (UTC) 2511:14:30, 7 April 2008 (UTC) 2481:14:06, 7 April 2008 (UTC) 2450:13:48, 7 April 2008 (UTC) 2428:09:22, 7 April 2008 (UTC) 2404:16:31, 5 April 2008 (UTC) 2388:16:12, 5 April 2008 (UTC) 2360:19:37, 4 April 2008 (UTC) 2342:12:08, 4 April 2008 (UTC) 2324:10:36, 3 April 2008 (UTC) 2310:10:20, 3 April 2008 (UTC) 2290:15:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC) 2272:09:42, 3 April 2008 (UTC) 2248:02:26, 3 April 2008 (UTC) 2190:03:32, 1 April 2008 (UTC) 1655:00:15, 3 April 2008 (UTC) 1609:16:19, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 1427:05:43, 1 April 2008 (UTC) 18:User talk:David Broadfoot 4240: 4183:01:33, 5 June 2008 (UTC) 4137:12:10, 3 June 2008 (UTC) 4132: 4105:11:24, 3 June 2008 (UTC) 4081:10:42, 3 June 2008 (UTC) 4076: 4051:06:00, 3 June 2008 (UTC) 3999:02:07, 3 June 2008 (UTC) 3994: 3984:01:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC) 3952: 3943:07:18, 1 June 2008 (UTC) 3923: 3914:07:00, 1 June 2008 (UTC) 3896:06:49, 1 June 2008 (UTC) 3881:06:43, 1 June 2008 (UTC) 3876: 3866:06:38, 1 June 2008 (UTC) 3838:22:28, 31 May 2008 (UTC) 3818:06:14, 1 June 2008 (UTC) 3813: 3795:20:27, 31 May 2008 (UTC) 3776:07:40, 31 May 2008 (UTC) 3771: 3754:21:32, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 3731:21:24, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 3726: 3576:20:34, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 3545:15:48, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 3540: 3529:Knowledge:Citing_sources 3514:15:27, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 3502:Knowledge:Citing_sources 3492:14:25, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 3487: 3435:14:25, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 3430: 3409:14:04, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 3394:13:58, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 3389: 3376:13:56, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 3362:13:49, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 3357: 3347:13:41, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 3320:13:24, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 3315: 3305:13:09, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 3288:13:04, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 3283: 3265:12:44, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 3246:12:37, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 3241: 3231:12:21, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 3216:12:18, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 3211: 3200:12:01, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 3175:12:06, 27 May 2008 (UTC) 3149:List of atheists (Music) 3115:18:59, 12 May 2008 (UTC) 3110: 3092:18:42, 12 May 2008 (UTC) 3071:19:11, 12 May 2008 (UTC) 3066: 3055:17:21, 12 May 2008 (UTC) 3040:12:36, 12 May 2008 (UTC) 2988:12:03, 27 May 2008 (UTC) 2948: 2903: 2866:Tenteisai/99.132.177.200 2833: 2772: 2731: 2680:04:12, 5 July 2008 (UTC) 2656: 2623: 2616:something wrong with you 2589: 2506: 2445: 2399: 2285: 2185: 2061: 1868: 1741: 1701: 1650: 1645:Yeah... I'm counting. -- 1557: 1476: 1422: 1351: 1297: 1022:List of celebrity judoka 297:WikiProject Martial arts 3854:arbitration enforcement 3125:Hi Oolon. I have split 3021:18:51, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 2953:09:15, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 2931:09:10, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 2908:08:52, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 2889:08:34, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 2861:15:01, 8 May 2008 (UTC) 2838:14:53, 8 May 2008 (UTC) 2823:14:45, 8 May 2008 (UTC) 2803: 437:extra links (for lists) 4272:, has been listed for 3097:Cyrus... you can read 3009:this sockpuppetry case 2208:Your question from AIV 1780:Thanks for your time! 854: 4320:Arbitration Committee 4154:Philip Porter Article 2872:Senso Ryū Aikijūjutsu 853: 4237:David from Downunder 4129:David from Downunder 4073:David from Downunder 3991:David from Downunder 3949:David from Downunder 3920:David from Downunder 3873:David from Downunder 3810:David from Downunder 3768:David from Downunder 3723:David from Downunder 3537:David from Downunder 3484:David from Downunder 3427:David from Downunder 3386:David from Downunder 3354:David from Downunder 3312:David from Downunder 3280:David from Downunder 3238:David from Downunder 3208:David from Downunder 3107:David from Downunder 3063:David from Downunder 3025: 2945:David from Downunder 2900:David from Downunder 2830:David from Downunder 2769:David from Downunder 2728:David from Downunder 2653:David from Downunder 2620:David from Downunder 2586:David from Downunder 2503:David from Downunder 2442:David from Downunder 2396:David from Downunder 2328:Look who's talking, 2282:David from Downunder 2182:David from Downunder 2058:David from Downunder 1865:David from Downunder 1756:Judoka video links.. 1738:David from Downunder 1698:David from Downunder 1676: 1647:David from Downunder 1554:David from Downunder 1473:David from Downunder 1419:David from Downunder 1348:David from Downunder 1294:David from Downunder 887:. If you remove the 881:Knowledge:Notability 4324:arbitration process 3013:Delicious carbuncle 1848:Judo#External_links 832:the discussion page 424:self-marketing. -- 379:User:Grappling Arts 277:Knowledge:Questions 4336:arbitration policy 4065:List of nontheists 1314:till they make it 855: 628:That was more the 242:How to edit a page 230:your contributions 1020:I have nominated 873:proposed deletion 16:(Redirected from 4362: 4299: 4287: 4270:Michael Parrella 4265: 4256:Michael Parrella 4069:List of atheists 3419:already told you 3127:List of atheists 3121:List of atheists 2700: 2696: 2370:which loads the 2253:US 'Imperialism' 2246: 2239: 2231: 2225: 2221: 2215: 2175:(judovision.org) 1310:True, I like to 896: 890: 866: 860: 799: 763: 671:Judo scoreboards 591:List of atheists 555:List of Atheists 286: 21: 4370: 4369: 4365: 4364: 4363: 4361: 4360: 4359: 4344:the voting page 4310: 4289: 4285: 4266: 4259: 4216: 4206: 4192: 4156: 4009: 3972: 3850:Thomas W. Davis 3846: 3183: 3123: 3079: 3028: 3005: 2986: 2928: 2886: 2868: 2806: 2758: 2744: 2687: 2558: 2530: 2478: 2425: 2367: 2348:your girlfriend 2298: 2269: 2255: 2235: 2233: 2229: 2223: 2219: 2213: 2210: 1966: 1950:I think adding 1804:WP:LINKSTOAVOID 1758: 1679: 1606: 1517: 1394: 1330: 1280: 1262: 1246:David Broadfoot 1222: 1201:David Broadfoot 1155:David Broadfoot 1134: 1123: 1103: 1080: 1049: 1018: 998:David Broadfoot 986: 970:he created and 954:David Broadfoot 936: 918: 894: 888: 864: 858: 848: 820: 797: 779:David Broadfoot 761: 744: 724:David Broadfoot 710:David Broadfoot 699:I wonder what " 673: 663: 644: 626: 610:David Broadfoot 595: 576:David Broadfoot 551: 541: 519: 509: 495: 485: 471:User:Loudenvier 467: 457: 439: 426:David Broadfoot 416: 396: 375: 364: 332: 321:David Broadfoot 311: 293: 280: 262:Manual of Style 217: 161:David Broadfoot 103:David Broadfoot 59:David Broadfoot 38: 31: 30: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 4368: 4366: 4313: 4309: 4304: 4260: 4258: 4254:nomination of 4249: 4248: 4247: 4215: 4212: 4202: 4191: 4186: 4155: 4152: 4150: 4148: 4147: 4146: 4145: 4144: 4143: 4142: 4141: 4140: 4139: 4115: 4113: 4112: 4111: 4110: 4109: 4108: 4107: 4106: 4103: 4099: 4088: 4087: 4086: 4085: 4084: 4083: 4056: 4055: 4054: 4053: 4040: 4039: 4038: 4027: 4026: 4019: 4008: 4003: 4002: 4001: 3971: 3968: 3967: 3966: 3965: 3964: 3963: 3962: 3961: 3960: 3959: 3958: 3957: 3956: 3845: 3842: 3841: 3840: 3825: 3824: 3823: 3822: 3821: 3820: 3800: 3799: 3798: 3797: 3779: 3778: 3764: 3742: 3741: 3740: 3739: 3738: 3737: 3736: 3735: 3734: 3733: 3709: 3708: 3707: 3706: 3705: 3704: 3703: 3702: 3701: 3700: 3687: 3686: 3685: 3684: 3683: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3678: 3662: 3661: 3660: 3659: 3658: 3657: 3656: 3655: 3654: 3653: 3641: 3640: 3639: 3638: 3637: 3636: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3631: 3630: 3619: 3611: 3610: 3607: 3587: 3585: 3584: 3583: 3582: 3581: 3580: 3579: 3578: 3552: 3551: 3550: 3549: 3548: 3547: 3519: 3518: 3517: 3516: 3480: 3479: 3476: 3473: 3470: 3467: 3464: 3461: 3458: 3455: 3448: 3447: 3446: 3445: 3444: 3443: 3442: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3422: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3331: 3330: 3329: 3328: 3327: 3326: 3325: 3324: 3323: 3322: 3182: 3179: 3178: 3177: 3166: 3161: 3156: 3151: 3146: 3141: 3136: 3129:. Please see: 3122: 3119: 3118: 3117: 3078: 3077:"Article Talk" 3075: 3074: 3073: 3027: 3024: 3004: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2991: 2990: 2982: 2979: 2975:99.132.177.200 2960: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2924: 2911: 2910: 2882: 2867: 2864: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2841: 2840: 2805: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2780: 2779: 2754: 2743: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2716:pronunciation 2686: 2683: 2664: 2663: 2635:70.137.190.187 2631: 2630: 2601:70.137.190.187 2597: 2596: 2571:70.137.190.187 2563:70.137.190.187 2557: 2554: 2529: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2474: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2421: 2407: 2406: 2366: 2363: 2297: 2296:Filthy atheist 2294: 2293: 2292: 2265: 2254: 2251: 2209: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2126: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2096: 2091: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1978: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1962: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1876: 1875: 1857: 1856: 1852: 1851: 1843: 1842: 1837: 1836: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1819: 1809: 1808: 1799: 1798: 1757: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1709: 1708: 1678: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1602: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1513: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1390: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1326: 1305: 1304: 1276: 1261: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1242:Exidy Sorcerer 1221: 1220:1982 computers 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1166: 1165: 1133: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1119: 1099: 1079: 1076: 1048: 1045: 1017: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 982: 950: 932: 917: 914: 847: 842: 819: 813: 812: 811: 810: 809: 790: 789: 743: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 672: 669: 659: 640: 625: 622: 621: 620: 594: 588: 587: 586: 550: 547: 537: 518: 515: 505: 494: 491: 481: 466: 463: 453: 438: 435: 434: 433: 432: 431: 412: 392: 374: 371: 370: 369: 360: 331: 328: 327: 326: 307: 292: 289: 273:sign your name 265: 264: 259: 254: 249: 244: 239: 216: 213: 212: 211: 210: 209: 208: 207: 206: 205: 204: 203: 202: 201: 200: 199: 177: 176: 175: 174: 173: 172: 171: 170: 169: 168: 167: 166: 146: 145: 144: 143: 142: 141: 140: 139: 138: 137: 115: 114: 113: 112: 111: 110: 109: 108: 86: 85: 84: 83: 82: 81: 67: 66: 65: 64: 37: 32: 27: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4367: 4358: 4357: 4353: 4349: 4345: 4341: 4337: 4333: 4329: 4325: 4321: 4317: 4308: 4305: 4303: 4302: 4297: 4293: 4288: 4281: 4280:. Thank you. 4279: 4275: 4271: 4264: 4257: 4253: 4250: 4246: 4242: 4238: 4233: 4232: 4231: 4230: 4226: 4222: 4214:Mitsuyo Maeda 4213: 4211: 4210: 4205: 4201: 4197: 4190: 4187: 4185: 4184: 4180: 4176: 4171: 4167: 4163: 4159: 4153: 4151: 4138: 4134: 4130: 4126: 4125: 4124: 4123: 4122: 4121: 4120: 4119: 4118: 4117: 4116: 4104: 4100: 4096: 4095: 4094: 4093: 4092: 4091: 4090: 4089: 4082: 4078: 4074: 4070: 4066: 4062: 4061: 4060: 4059: 4058: 4057: 4052: 4048: 4044: 4041: 4036: 4035: 4033: 4029: 4028: 4024: 4020: 4017: 4016: 4015: 4014: 4013: 4007: 4006:Dong Sik Yoon 4004: 4000: 3996: 3992: 3988: 3987: 3986: 3985: 3981: 3977: 3969: 3954: 3950: 3946: 3945: 3944: 3940: 3936: 3935:Justallofthem 3932: 3928: 3927: 3925: 3921: 3917: 3916: 3915: 3911: 3907: 3906:Justallofthem 3903: 3899: 3898: 3897: 3893: 3889: 3888:Justallofthem 3884: 3883: 3882: 3878: 3874: 3870: 3869: 3868: 3867: 3863: 3859: 3858:Justallofthem 3855: 3851: 3844:Please revert 3843: 3839: 3835: 3831: 3827: 3826: 3819: 3815: 3811: 3806: 3805: 3804: 3803: 3802: 3801: 3796: 3792: 3788: 3783: 3782: 3781: 3780: 3777: 3773: 3769: 3765: 3763: 3758: 3757: 3756: 3755: 3751: 3747: 3732: 3728: 3724: 3719: 3718: 3717: 3716: 3715: 3714: 3713: 3712: 3711: 3710: 3697: 3696: 3695: 3694: 3693: 3692: 3691: 3690: 3689: 3688: 3676: 3675:wrong in fact 3672: 3671: 3670: 3669: 3668: 3667: 3666: 3665: 3664: 3663: 3651: 3650: 3649: 3648: 3647: 3646: 3645: 3644: 3643: 3642: 3628: 3624: 3620: 3617: 3613: 3612: 3608: 3605: 3601: 3600: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3595: 3594: 3593: 3592: 3591: 3590: 3589: 3588: 3577: 3573: 3569: 3565: 3560: 3559: 3558: 3557: 3556: 3555: 3554: 3553: 3546: 3542: 3538: 3534: 3530: 3525: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3520: 3515: 3511: 3507: 3503: 3498: 3497: 3496: 3495: 3494: 3493: 3489: 3485: 3477: 3474: 3471: 3468: 3466:mobile masses 3465: 3462: 3459: 3456: 3453: 3452: 3451: 3436: 3432: 3428: 3423: 3420: 3416: 3412: 3411: 3410: 3406: 3402: 3397: 3396: 3395: 3391: 3387: 3383: 3379: 3378: 3377: 3373: 3369: 3365: 3364: 3363: 3359: 3355: 3350: 3349: 3348: 3344: 3340: 3335: 3321: 3317: 3313: 3308: 3307: 3306: 3302: 3298: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3285: 3281: 3277: 3273: 3268: 3267: 3266: 3262: 3258: 3253: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3243: 3239: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3228: 3224: 3219: 3218: 3217: 3213: 3209: 3204: 3203: 3202: 3201: 3197: 3193: 3188: 3180: 3176: 3173: 3170: 3167: 3165: 3162: 3160: 3157: 3155: 3152: 3150: 3147: 3145: 3142: 3140: 3137: 3135: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3128: 3120: 3116: 3112: 3108: 3104: 3100: 3096: 3095: 3094: 3093: 3089: 3085: 3076: 3072: 3068: 3064: 3059: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3052: 3048: 3042: 3041: 3037: 3033: 3023: 3022: 3018: 3014: 3011:. Thanks. 3010: 3003: 2989: 2985: 2980: 2976: 2972: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2954: 2950: 2946: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2932: 2927: 2923: 2919: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2909: 2905: 2901: 2897: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2885: 2881: 2877: 2873: 2865: 2863: 2862: 2858: 2854: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2839: 2835: 2831: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2812: 2809: 2799: 2795: 2791: 2787: 2786:The Red Baron 2782: 2781: 2778: 2774: 2770: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2757: 2753: 2749: 2741: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2723: 2719: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2708: 2704: 2691: 2684: 2682: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2672:70.137.153.69 2669: 2662: 2658: 2654: 2650: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2629: 2625: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2606: 2602: 2595: 2591: 2587: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2576: 2572: 2568: 2564: 2555: 2553: 2552: 2548: 2544: 2539: 2538:Tamara Davies 2535: 2527: 2526:Tamara Davies 2524: 2512: 2508: 2504: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2482: 2477: 2473: 2469: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2429: 2424: 2420: 2416: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2405: 2401: 2397: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2385: 2381: 2377: 2373: 2364: 2362: 2361: 2357: 2353: 2349: 2344: 2343: 2339: 2335: 2331: 2330:lizard-licker 2326: 2325: 2321: 2317: 2312: 2311: 2307: 2303: 2295: 2291: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2250: 2249: 2244: 2240: 2238: 2228: 2222:redirects to 2218: 2207: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2174: 2171: 2170: 2168: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2127: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2100: 2097: 2095: 2092: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 2001: 1991: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1970: 1965: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1861:User:Nate1481 1859: 1858: 1854: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1844: 1839: 1838: 1835: 1831: 1827: 1826: 1820: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1811: 1810: 1805: 1801: 1800: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1778: 1775: 1771: 1770: 1765: 1761: 1755: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1725: 1721: 1717: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1610: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1521: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1398: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1363: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1334: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1219: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1197: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1131: 1127: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1077: 1075: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1053:Postage stamp 1047:Postage stamp 1046: 1044: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1015: 1007: 1003: 999: 995: 992: 991: 990: 985: 981: 977: 973: 969: 965: 964: 963: 959: 955: 951: 948: 943: 942: 941: 940: 935: 931: 927: 923: 922:User:DrParkes 915: 913: 912: 908: 904: 900: 893: 886: 885:its talk page 882: 878: 874: 870: 863: 852: 846: 843: 841: 840: 837: 833: 829: 825: 818: 814: 808: 805: 804: 800: 794: 793: 792: 791: 788: 784: 780: 775: 774: 773: 772: 769: 768: 764: 758: 753: 752:Tamara Davies 749: 742: 741:Tamara Davies 739: 733: 729: 725: 721: 720: 719: 715: 711: 706: 702: 698: 697: 696: 695: 691: 687: 686:129.16.97.227 683: 679: 670: 668: 667: 662: 658: 654: 649: 648: 643: 639: 635: 631: 623: 619: 615: 611: 607: 606: 605: 604: 601: 592: 589: 585: 581: 577: 572: 571: 570: 569: 565: 561: 556: 548: 546: 545: 540: 536: 532: 528: 524: 516: 514: 513: 508: 504: 500: 492: 490: 489: 484: 480: 476: 472: 464: 462: 461: 456: 452: 448: 444: 436: 430: 427: 422: 421: 420: 415: 411: 407: 403: 402: 401: 400: 395: 391: 387: 383: 380: 372: 368: 363: 359: 355: 351: 348: 347: 346: 345: 342: 338: 329: 325: 322: 318: 317: 316: 315: 310: 306: 302: 298: 290: 288: 284: 278: 274: 270: 263: 260: 258: 255: 253: 250: 248: 245: 243: 240: 238: 235: 234: 233: 231: 227: 222: 221: 214: 198: 195: 191: 190: 189: 188: 187: 186: 185: 184: 183: 182: 181: 180: 179: 178: 165: 162: 158: 157: 156: 155: 154: 153: 152: 151: 150: 149: 148: 147: 136: 132: 129: 125: 124: 123: 122: 121: 120: 119: 118: 117: 116: 107: 104: 100: 98: 94: 93: 92: 91: 90: 89: 88: 87: 80: 77: 73: 72: 71: 70: 69: 68: 63: 60: 56: 52: 51: 50: 49: 48: 47: 44: 36: 33: 19: 4311: 4282: 4267: 4217: 4199: 4193: 4175:Soothsayer12 4172: 4168: 4164: 4160: 4157: 4149: 4114: 4031: 4010: 3973: 3847: 3761: 3743: 3674: 3626: 3622: 3615: 3603: 3586: 3481: 3449: 3418: 3414: 3381: 3275: 3271: 3251: 3184: 3126: 3124: 3080: 3043: 3029: 3006: 2969:Sorry, your 2921: 2879: 2869: 2851: 2813: 2810: 2807: 2751: 2745: 2717: 2697:/ (UK) vs. / 2692: 2688: 2665: 2649:This article 2632: 2615: 2598: 2559: 2543:TexasAndroid 2531: 2471: 2418: 2375: 2371: 2368: 2345: 2327: 2313: 2299: 2262: 2256: 2236: 2211: 1989: 1977: 1959: 1951: 1782: 1779: 1776: 1772: 1766: 1762: 1759: 1680: 1599: 1510: 1387: 1361: 1323: 1315: 1273: 1263: 1223: 1195: 1135: 1132:David A Ross 1116: 1096: 1081: 1078:Chan Tai San 1050: 1019: 979: 947:Helio Gracie 929: 919: 856: 821: 817:VandalProof! 802: 766: 745: 700: 677: 674: 656: 650: 637: 627: 596: 552: 534: 520: 502: 496: 478: 468: 450: 440: 409: 389: 376: 357: 333: 304: 294: 291:Martial arts 266: 223: 219: 218: 39: 3976:Tim Vickers 3830:Tim Vickers 3026:Aoki's Page 3007:Please see 2721:Wiktionary. 2380:Nick Graves 2237:Luna Santin 1834:WP:NOT#TEXT 1760:Hi David, 1312:play nicely 1266:went a head 968:sockpuppets 815:Welcome to 748:Anne Archer 465:BJJ History 97:Bruce_Elder 55:Bruce_Elder 4332:topic bans 4286:Explodicle 4221:Loudenvier 4043:70.51.8.63 4030:Since you 3460:nonpainful 2790:Milkbreath 2352:Milkbreath 2334:Milkbreath 2316:Milkbreath 2302:Milkbreath 1830:WP:NOT#DIR 1828:Also read 1716:Milkbreath 1683:Milkbreath 1677:Don't bite 1227:Loudenvier 869:Ashida Kim 845:Ashida Kim 523:WP:Twinkle 269:Wikipedian 247:Help pages 35:Albert Lee 4328:site bans 4158:Hi Dave, 2668:Edinburgh 2227:userlinks 1260:BJJ/Vapor 1089:Barry Ley 1065:ww2censor 972:Barry Ley 828:moderator 373:BJJ links 330:Reverting 271:! Please 194:Lion King 135:Lion King 128:Lion King 76:Lion King 43:Lion King 4274:deletion 4235:day. -- 4196:Nate1481 3787:Schu1321 3746:Schu1321 3568:Schu1321 3506:Schu1321 3401:Schu1321 3368:Schu1321 3339:Schu1321 3337:either. 3297:Schu1321 3257:Schu1321 3223:Schu1321 3192:Schu1321 3084:Cyrus777 3047:Cyrus777 3032:Cyrus777 2918:Nate1481 2876:Nate1481 2748:Nate1481 2468:Nate1481 2415:Nate1481 2372:homepage 2259:Nate1481 2026:Regards 1990:specific 1956:Nate1481 1952:specific 1911:Judokas. 1882:article. 1814:WP:LINKS 1596:Nate1481 1507:Nate1481 1384:Nate1481 1320:Nate1481 1270:Nate1481 1113:Nate1481 1093:Nate1481 1057:WP:LINKS 1034:Pichpich 1026:deletion 976:Nate1481 926:Nate1481 653:Nate1481 634:Nate1481 630:Dyslexia 531:Nate1481 499:Nate1481 475:Nate1481 447:Nate1481 406:Nate1481 386:Nate1481 354:Nate1481 301:Nate1481 252:Tutorial 220:Welcome! 3564:uncivil 2742:Oh dear 2365:Browser 1316:obvious 1173:Nysanda 1139:Nysanda 701:largely 560:Marwood 350:Twinkle 226:welcome 215:Welcome 4318:. The 4032:merged 4023:WP:RFD 3970:Lipoma 3931:WP:3RR 3187:lipoma 3181:Lipoma 3172:RS1900 2685:Holmes 2618:." -- 2217:vandal 2167:WP:MOS 1196:please 1091:... -- 1059:; see 704:search 678:always 624:Thanks 593:revert 283:helpme 3902:WP:AE 3463:round 2853:Oolon 2815:Oolon 2699:hɔɫmz 2528:again 1552:! -- 903:BJBot 798:Jayen 762:Jayen 493:Sambo 4352:talk 4241:talk 4225:talk 4179:talk 4133:talk 4077:talk 4047:talk 3995:talk 3980:talk 3953:talk 3939:talk 3924:talk 3910:talk 3892:talk 3877:talk 3862:talk 3834:talk 3814:talk 3791:talk 3772:talk 3750:talk 3727:talk 3572:talk 3541:talk 3510:talk 3488:talk 3431:talk 3405:talk 3390:talk 3372:talk 3358:talk 3343:talk 3316:talk 3301:talk 3284:talk 3261:talk 3242:talk 3227:talk 3212:talk 3196:talk 3111:talk 3088:talk 3067:talk 3051:talk 3036:talk 3017:talk 3000:Re: 2949:talk 2904:talk 2896:here 2857:talk 2834:talk 2819:talk 2794:talk 2773:talk 2732:talk 2707:talk 2695:homz 2676:talk 2657:talk 2639:talk 2624:talk 2605:talk 2590:talk 2575:talk 2567:talk 2547:talk 2507:talk 2446:talk 2400:talk 2384:talk 2356:talk 2346:Yo, 2338:talk 2332:. -- 2320:talk 2306:talk 2300:? -- 2286:talk 2243:talk 2186:talk 2133:talk 2129:Evdz 2062:talk 2032:talk 2028:Evdz 1934:talk 1930:Evdz 1869:talk 1832:and 1788:talk 1784:Evdz 1742:talk 1720:talk 1702:talk 1687:talk 1651:talk 1558:talk 1477:talk 1423:talk 1362:much 1352:talk 1298:talk 1250:talk 1231:talk 1205:talk 1177:talk 1159:talk 1143:talk 1069:talk 1038:talk 1002:talk 958:talk 916:Judo 907:talk 892:prod 879:and 862:prod 783:talk 728:talk 714:talk 690:talk 614:talk 580:talk 564:talk 517:spam 382:here 341:andy 4312:Hi, 4252:AfD 4189:TKD 3415:not 3252:not 2978:in. 2703:Dan 1797:Hi. 1085:3RR 803:466 767:466 443:AWB 4354:) 4330:, 4243:) 4227:) 4207:) 4181:) 4135:) 4079:) 4049:) 3997:) 3982:) 3941:) 3926:) 3912:) 3894:) 3886:-- 3879:) 3864:) 3836:) 3816:) 3808:-- 3793:) 3774:) 3752:) 3729:) 3574:) 3543:) 3512:) 3490:) 3433:) 3407:) 3392:) 3384:-- 3374:) 3360:) 3345:) 3318:) 3303:) 3286:) 3276:my 3263:) 3244:) 3229:) 3214:) 3198:) 3113:) 3090:) 3069:) 3061:-- 3053:) 3038:) 3019:) 2984:GB 2951:) 2929:) 2906:) 2887:) 2859:) 2836:) 2821:) 2796:) 2775:) 2767:-- 2759:) 2734:) 2718:is 2705:| 2678:) 2659:) 2641:) 2626:) 2607:) 2592:) 2577:) 2549:) 2509:) 2479:) 2448:) 2426:) 2402:) 2386:) 2358:) 2340:) 2322:) 2308:) 2288:) 2270:) 2230:}} 2224:{{ 2220:}} 2214:{{ 2188:) 2135:) 2064:) 2034:) 1967:) 1936:) 1871:) 1790:) 1744:) 1722:) 1704:) 1689:) 1653:) 1607:) 1560:) 1518:) 1479:) 1450::D 1425:) 1395:) 1382:-- 1354:) 1331:) 1300:) 1288:I 1281:) 1252:) 1233:) 1207:) 1179:) 1161:) 1145:) 1124:) 1104:) 1071:) 1040:) 1004:) 987:) 960:) 937:) 909:) 895:}} 889:{{ 865:}} 859:{{ 834:. 785:) 730:) 716:) 692:) 664:) 645:) 616:) 600:TM 582:) 574:-- 566:) 542:) 510:) 486:) 458:) 417:) 397:) 365:) 339:. 312:) 285:}} 281:{{ 4350:( 4298:) 4296:C 4294:/ 4292:T 4290:( 4239:( 4223:( 4204:c 4200:/ 4198:( 4177:( 4131:( 4075:( 4045:( 4025:. 3993:( 3978:( 3955:) 3951:( 3937:( 3922:( 3908:( 3890:( 3875:( 3860:( 3832:( 3812:( 3789:( 3770:( 3748:( 3725:( 3570:( 3539:( 3508:( 3486:( 3429:( 3403:( 3388:( 3380:' 3370:( 3356:( 3341:( 3314:( 3299:( 3282:( 3259:( 3240:( 3225:( 3210:( 3194:( 3109:( 3086:( 3065:( 3049:( 3034:( 3015:( 2947:( 2926:c 2922:/ 2920:( 2902:( 2884:c 2880:/ 2878:( 2855:( 2832:( 2817:( 2792:( 2771:( 2756:c 2752:/ 2750:( 2730:( 2674:( 2655:( 2637:( 2622:( 2603:( 2588:( 2573:( 2565:( 2545:( 2505:( 2476:c 2472:/ 2470:( 2444:( 2423:c 2419:/ 2417:( 2398:( 2382:( 2354:( 2336:( 2318:( 2304:( 2284:( 2267:c 2263:/ 2261:( 2245:) 2241:( 2184:( 2131:( 2060:( 2030:( 1964:c 1960:/ 1958:( 1932:( 1867:( 1850:. 1786:( 1740:( 1718:( 1700:( 1685:( 1649:( 1604:c 1600:/ 1598:( 1556:( 1515:c 1511:/ 1509:( 1475:( 1421:( 1392:c 1388:/ 1386:( 1350:( 1328:c 1324:/ 1322:( 1296:( 1278:c 1274:/ 1272:( 1248:( 1229:( 1211:. 1203:( 1175:( 1157:( 1141:( 1121:c 1117:/ 1115:( 1101:c 1097:/ 1095:( 1067:( 1036:( 1000:( 984:c 980:/ 978:( 956:( 934:c 930:/ 928:( 905:( 836:β 781:( 726:( 712:( 688:( 661:c 657:/ 655:( 642:c 638:/ 636:( 612:( 578:( 562:( 539:c 535:/ 533:( 507:c 503:/ 501:( 483:c 479:/ 477:( 455:c 451:/ 449:( 414:c 410:/ 408:( 394:c 390:/ 388:( 362:c 358:/ 356:( 309:c 305:/ 303:( 20:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index