166:
English; you cannot expect me to know everything that is unfolding within all
Knowledge language branches. If I may try and sum up my rational for originally reverting your edits: it was done by a brand new account (possible sock puppet), I am inherently suspicious of additions to Knowledge that "rock the boat" (most of my experience with such edits has been subtle vandalism), and, quite frankly, the grammar was a bit poor (another point that made me suspicious). I cannot read the report done by the BMJ, as I do not have a subscription; so I could not verify for myself what was said. I realize suspecting your edit's integrity because of its grammar was an unfair judgement on my behalf, and really I have no excuse, but by "observing" my lack of courtesy and accusing that I deleted "the whole paragraph because of one sentence that maybe could be translated differently" was, I feel, an unfair judgement on your behalf. You are absolutely correct, I do not know as much about dentistry as yourself, I am no dentist. I am sorry that I have erroneously edited, I truly am, and as this discussion isn't really going anywhere I'm going to drop the issue. I had not reverted with malicious intent, and I don't understand why it was assumed to be such; if you have questions about my edits in the future, please ask me about them first. Regards,
413:
688:
336:
237:
445:
536:
23:
165:
I welcomed you to
Knowledge because you are a new account and you haven't made very many edits. I'm sorry if I offended you with my attempts at courtesy, but it was in the spirit of being polite. I had not known of other discussions of this sort unfolding on other language Wipipedias, as I speak only
91:
is considered original research. I am going to revert your edits, as by rewriting that entire paragraph you have destroyed encyclopedic work, but I will attempt to integrate the study you have cited into the text. Please be aware I am not attempting to repress your point of view, I am only wanting to
106:
It would appear I need to start a second message to adequately reply to the further accusations leveled against me. Personal attacks are a very poor way of arguing your side; by attacking my integrity as an editor it gives me the impression you are not interested in the benefit of
Knowledge, instead
87:. Claiming studies contradictory to your point of view are "aged and to much in-vitro focused, had to small numbers of test subjects and/or erroneous statistics and trial set-up, or were originating from a research sponsored by a manufacturer of the product" without providing a source where that has
492:
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can
126:
So again, it's not a matter of agreeing or disagreeing; it's a matter of applying science as it should be or not - rather a technical discussion. And if you don't agree how evidence based medicine works, well than, that's a whole different discussion. If you don't want to acknowledge the fact that
82:
is not tolerated. I understand that I may not be an expert on Co-enzyme Q10 like yourself, but making the accusation that "On their website Pharma Nord links to even more "scientific" articles "proving" the effectiveness of coenzyme Q10 on periodontal disease, all of very poor quality" is biased,
107:
it seems you perceive yourself as "right", myself as "wrong", and come hell or high water you are going to make sure
Knowledge reflects what is "right". I am sorry if by reverting your edits I have wounded your pride, but Knowledge is not a soapbox on which to broadcast your ideas. I
711:
50:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you.
714:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
387:
Unfortunately this is a REAL PROFESSION and I have given enough references so you can check the very existence of the professional at stake. There is no other
English word to describe this alternative medical profession other than calling him a
362:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
505:
499:
to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with
620:
366:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
718:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
616:
92:
improve
Knowledge. Also, please fill out the edit summary box when making an edit, it is very helpful to other editors. If you have any other concerns please feel free to contact me on my talk page. Regards,
481:) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the
567:
The link will take you to the talk page, where you can explain why the article should be kept. If you have any questions about this or need help with editing, you can ask at the
359:
193:
396:
So is there a "better" term to describe alternative medicine therapists working in the dental field? I challenge you to find me a better one that this one! --
127:
the review study superseeds all the others on the matter of dentistry, fine, but than don't call it
Science anymore and that's against Knowledge guidelines.--
546:
designed by another
Knowledge editor, and I'm here to help you with our deletion process. I noticed that while working on an article recently, you removed a
700:
604:
348:
207:, a forum on Knowledge for new editors to ask questions about editing Knowledge, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!
644:
640:
391:
And YES, the irony is that the term was first used in a sketch of an Irish stand-up comedian. This however shows the irony of this professional.
434:
300:
600:
426:
83:
uses loaded language and use of quotes, and is un-encyclopedic. Knowledge is a tertiary source, i.e. it only reports on things that have
695:
679:
612:
41:
47:
46:
40:
304:
597:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
454:
111:
try to include your BDJ review in the text, but do not make personal attacks towards me because you disagree. Regards,
292:
248:
226:
550:
template that tagged it for deletion. Don't get discouraged! Deletion discussions happen on
Knowledge all the time.
501:
296:
704:
352:
594:
461:
212:
509:
316:
579:
279:
495:
724:
486:
419:
412:
397:
375:
148:
128:
31:
144:
712:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Comparison of dental practice management software (2nd nomination)
568:
517:
343:
327:
308:
244:
230:
27:
528:
470:
438:
208:
204:
668:
312:
275:
56:
575:
720:
636:
368:
171:
116:
97:
513:
477:, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company,
659:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
547:
482:
474:
262:
79:
75:
664:
660:
543:
71:
52:
192:
38:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
261:
While all contributions to
Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be
651:
627:
473:
requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under
574:
We really hope you'll stick around to help make Knowledge better! Thank you, -
167:
112:
93:
285:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing
539:
Hello, and welcome to Knowledge! Thanks for taking the time to contribute.
453:
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
728:
672:
583:
521:
405:
381:
320:
216:
175:
156:
136:
120:
101:
60:
593:
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to
35:
70:
Hello, and welcome to Knowledge. While editors are encouraged to
487:
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
443:
429:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
411:
235:
30:
and Knowledge pages that have open discussion, you should
26:
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
693:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
558:
341:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
303:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
268:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
699:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
347:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
485:, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please
696:Comparison of dental practice management software
680:Comparison of dental practice management software
613:Comparison of dental practice management software
451:
475:section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion
360:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Toothiologist
589:Disambiguation link notification for April 18
418:Hello, DeTandarts. You have new messages at
184:Welcome to Knowledge: check out the Teahouse!
8:
554:If you don't want the article to get deleted
504:. If the page is deleted, you can contact
455:the guide to writing your first article
274:notice, but please explain why in your
7:
701:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
512:the page or email a copy to you.
502:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
460:You may want to consider using the
349:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
508:to request that the administrator
263:deleted for any of several reasons
251:because of the following concern:
14:
710:The article will be discussed at
358:The article will be discussed at
686:
534:
334:
191:
45:
39:
21:
1:
496:the page's talk page directly
483:criteria for speedy deletion
464:to help you create articles.
256:This is an non-notable term.
506:one of these administrators
307:allows discussion to reach
288:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
271:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
744:
673:10:07, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
584:16:46, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
522:16:37, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
406:15:24, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
382:15:09, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
321:14:53, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
299:exist. In particular, the
217:07:01, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
176:02:57, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
157:21:30, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
137:21:28, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
121:19:43, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
102:19:43, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
78:and editing from a biased
61:19:38, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
729:14:14, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
650:added a link pointing to
626:added a link pointing to
469:A tag has been placed on
293:proposed deletion process
203:, you are invited to the
703:or whether it should be
401:
351:or whether it should be
152:
132:
85:already been reported on
280:the article's talk page
145:Evidence Based Medicine
466:
448:
420:Roleplayer's talk page
416:
240:
147:and I rest my case! --
447:
415:
305:articles for deletion
249:proposed for deletion
239:
661:opt-out instructions
595:disambiguation pages
645:fix with Dab solver
621:fix with Dab solver
527:Removing Speedy at
89:already been stated
603:• Join us at the
449:
427:remove this notice
417:
297:deletion processes
241:
608:
227:Proposed deletion
223:
222:
76:original research
17:Your recent edits
735:
690:
689:
641:check to confirm
617:check to confirm
598:
563:
538:
537:
446:
430:
372:
338:
337:
290:
289:
273:
272:
238:
195:
188:
187:
49:
43:
25:
24:
743:
742:
738:
737:
736:
734:
733:
732:
691:
687:
684:
637:Dental software
605:DPL WikiProject
591:
557:
548:speedy deletion
535:
532:
467:
444:
442:
435:Speedy deletion
431:
424:
370:
339:
335:
332:
301:speedy deletion
287:
286:
270:
269:
236:
234:
219:
186:
143:The pyramid of
68:
34:by typing four
32:sign your posts
22:
19:
12:
11:
5:
741:
739:
685:
683:
678:Nomination of
676:
657:
656:
655:
654:
633:
632:
631:
630:
590:
587:
531:
525:
462:Article Wizard
450:
441:
437:nomination of
432:
423:
410:
409:
408:
393:
392:
389:
388:Toothiologist.
333:
331:
326:Nomination of
324:
311:for deletion.
291:will stop the
259:
258:
233:
224:
221:
220:
198:
196:
185:
182:
181:
180:
179:
178:
160:
159:
140:
139:
67:
64:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
740:
731:
730:
726:
722:
716:
713:
708:
706:
702:
698:
697:
681:
677:
675:
674:
670:
666:
662:
653:
649:
648:
646:
642:
638:
635:
634:
629:
625:
624:
622:
618:
614:
611:
610:
609:
606:
602:
596:
588:
586:
585:
581:
577:
572:
570:
565:
562:
561:
555:
551:
549:
545:
540:
530:
526:
524:
523:
519:
515:
511:
507:
503:
498:
497:
490:
488:
484:
480:
476:
472:
465:
463:
458:
456:
440:
436:
433:
428:
421:
414:
407:
403:
399:
395:
394:
390:
386:
385:
384:
383:
380:
379:
378:
374:
373:
364:
361:
356:
354:
350:
346:
345:
344:Toothiologist
329:
328:Toothiologist
325:
323:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
283:
281:
277:
266:
264:
257:
254:
253:
252:
250:
246:
245:Toothiologist
232:
231:Toothiologist
228:
225:
218:
214:
210:
209:heather walls
206:
202:
197:
194:
190:
189:
183:
177:
173:
169:
164:
163:
162:
161:
158:
154:
150:
146:
142:
141:
138:
134:
130:
125:
124:
123:
122:
118:
114:
110:
104:
103:
99:
95:
90:
86:
81:
80:point of view
77:
73:
65:
63:
62:
58:
54:
48:
42:
37:
33:
29:
16:
717:
709:
694:
692:
682:for deletion
658:
592:
573:
566:
559:
553:
552:
541:
533:
529:Osfinancials
494:
491:
478:
471:Osfinancials
468:
459:
452:
439:Osfinancials
377:
376:
369:
365:
357:
342:
340:
330:for deletion
313:Tchaliburton
295:, but other
284:
276:edit summary
267:
260:
255:
243:The article
242:
200:
108:
105:
88:
84:
69:
20:
652:Proprietary
628:Proprietary
576:SDPatrolBot
493:also visit
721:Praxidicae
663:. Thanks,
560:click here
398:DeTandarts
201:DeTandarts
149:DeTandarts
129:DeTandarts
28:talk pages
599:Read the
569:Help desk
556:, please
514:West Eddy
309:consensus
247:has been
425:You can
205:Teahouse
705:deleted
665:DPL bot
353:deleted
199:Hello!
72:be bold
53:SineBot
542:I'm a
510:userfy
278:or on
66:Reply.
36:tildes
168:HMman
113:HMman
94:HMman
725:talk
669:talk
580:talk
518:talk
479:etc.
402:talk
371:role
317:talk
213:talk
172:talk
153:talk
133:talk
117:talk
109:will
98:talk
57:talk
601:FAQ
571:.
544:bot
489:.
229:of
44:or
727:)
707:.
671:)
647:)
643:|
623:)
619:|
582:)
564:.
520:)
404:)
355:.
319:)
282:.
265:.
215:)
174:)
155:)
135:)
119:)
100:)
74:,
59:)
51:--
723:(
667:(
639:(
615:(
607:.
578:(
516:(
457:.
422:.
400:(
315:(
211:(
170:(
151:(
131:(
115:(
96:(
55:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
