422:
into question the judgement of others when they have honest disagreements with you, (2) question them when they call into question how this conduct of yours is very likely itself a violation of the rules of civility, (3) choose not to respond to their arguments directly when they do make them, and (4) overreact emotionally when they remind you of this. You are the one who saw fit to interrogate anyone else whenever they disagree, and now, after I have supplied reasons as per your apparent demand for my justification of my opinion, you continue to act as if somehow you are the party being wronged. I have never to my knowledge had any contact with you before, nor do I have any reason to actually want any further contact with you beyond the minimum required to do that which I am trying to do to enhance wikipedia. I sincerely hope that you will refrain from continuing to cross-examine those who have honest disagreements with you on the proposed award. I sincerely hope that you will try to distance yourself from the issue and cease your attempts to interrogate and otherwise call into question the fair judgements of those that honestly disagree with you, because I personally believe that it may have been your own reactions to wikipedia, not wikipedia itself, which made you sick. Please refrain from continuing to harrass those who disagree with you regarding the award. In fact, given your health complications, I think it might be a good idea if you stop watching the page completely, and simply wait out the two weeks Evrik, who has over the months given me the impression that he may be the only editor actively involved in all of the proposals made on that page, noted is the standard time for discussion to see if it is approved or not. Certainly, questioning others and attacking them for disagreeing with you will not help you or your health. I anticipate, and honestly hope, that I will receive no response on my talk page to this, just like I hope that you will allow the current nomination to continue without your further questioning of the judgement of others.
802:
horrific that quite frankly I can excuse their defenses of
Esperanza and are both reasonable people. The Halo is at least openminded to change, and Moreschi is one of my best friends. That being said, I'm afraid that if I take something to MfD I will be accused once again of agendaism. And with my feelings toward the org as a whole right now, they might be right. I will not be nominating anything for deletion until I've seen them operate under a completely revamped plan for a bit. There's no hurry. Their dog-barking Coffee Lounge, ridiculous games, and userpage award programs are gone, and their plan to ejaculate barnstars and smilies randomly without thought to actual achievement is also gone. What remains (stress alerts, tutorials, etc) has the potential to be of use.
376:
challenge, some argue that the Bio star is enough, or that the design can be different, or similar. I view their statements as valid arguments. Give the barnstar some time to mature on the page and maybe there will be enough supporters to come and have their say. I honestly feel evrik is not trying to push an agenda, he just has a slightly overly blunt way of saying his opinion but I see for what reason he feels that he needs to do that. All in all I feel barnstars representing any community should be given at least a fair and just chance. I hope you have not had a stressful week either! Anyways I'm off to cruise Recent
Changes, feel free to leave a message on my talk page any time.
1282:
weeks of consideration and a "groundswell" of support. I personally question whether this award achieved the required groundswell with only about a dozen votes. I will not personally challenge the possible premature closing of the discussion, but think that at some point down the line someone else might. I don't know, but I can't rule it out. Also, I personally think it's best if we allow those who are more generally involved in such discussions to close them, as they tend to be more fully informed of the existing guidelines than those who are, shall we say, rather pronouncedly partisan in the affair. Just for your information.
1149:
is a weak point for me, and evidently this includes
Esperanza process as well. For what it's worth, I don't recall having voted anyway. I don't feel stifled by the governance structure, but my participation in Esperanza is mostly limited to participating with Stress Alerts (both asking help and offering it) as well as trying to be nice in general. Rather ironically, the current MfD-related matters are probably the most I've ever gotten involved with Esperanza in terms of the amount of thought and effort I've put in.
1385:
up. Your reply, which began with "Why don't you back off and chill out? Where the hell were you when
Esperanza was being MfDed?", obviously shows that you do not feel warmly towards me, and I think it offers a very substantial case for bias on your part were I ever to perform something that was cause for disciplinary action. You do not seem to be very predisposed towards remaining calm when interacting with me, and I think it blemishes your ability to monitor me objectively.
1440:
enough to merit the existence of a project. Also, the fact that the project has existed for almost two years and is still active is evidence that the project, however limited the scope, is sufficiently real to qualify as a legitimate WikiProject and thus qualify for an award. There are certainly other editors who question the need for projects such as these single-college projects, myself among them. However, given the unqualified success of another "micro-project",
1108:
Just so you know, I had participated a little in the coffee lounge, but I got turned off of it because of the random dog barking and a series of dirty jokes which I felt were sexist, offensive, and not at all belonging on
Knowledge. Because I had participated only to a limited extent, my overall edit count (2971 as of 20:38, 22 November 2006 (UTC)) wasn't seriously affected when the coffee lounge was deleted.
1636:
518:
888:
320:
standard. At a certain point, I think I am going to have to start openly discussing what I think is going on. I hope you will support me if it comes to that. By the way, have you ever felt that there was homophobia on Wiki? It was mentioned to me once and I would like to discuss that with somebody who has been here longer than me.
331:
award....but kept its name of
Scouting Barnstar. I do think that is worthy of mention if the decision is taken to make the LGBT Barnstar a project award--to say "put it on the award page but keep it with a Barnstar name. And digressing for a moment, I have an article I wrote on a LGBT topic up for FAC right now,
1919:
Your point is valid, and well taken, Dev. However, perhaps similarly to
Elaragirl, I have no patience for fools and bigots. I will try to exercise more tolerance and restraint, though I should say Wiki is not the be all and end all of my existence, so if I ruffle a few feathers I won't lose any sleep
1349:
It is not acceptable to stalk another editor who is editing in good faith. (Note that everyone is expected to assume good faith in the absence of definite evidence to the contrary.) Once an editor has given reason to suspect bad faith, monitoring is appropriate, but constantly nit-picking is always a
1281:
Please don't take this the wrong way. However, you will note on the various other barnstars that have been on the list longer than the LGBT barnstar that they have been in discussion for a long time now. I believe the full description of the requirements for the award being finalized are at least two
1111:
I had proposed a hypothetical merger between
Esperanza, the Kindness Campaign, and Concordia, and while I still think that many of their stated goals overlap, I also feel that Esperanza needs to better define itself before even considering such a merger, and feedback must be solicited from members of
666:
This does not assume the good faith of those
Esperanzans who participate in RFA. As I am an Esperanzan who has participated regularly in RFA, I do not believe the comment that an Esperanzan will immediately "vote" for another Esperanzan. In fact, my strongest support comments were those for users not
1392:
So my suggestion is this: if you feel I'm a threat, hand off the monitoring to one of the hundreds of administrators referred to above who can carry on the monitoring task equally as well as you can ... or better, given their access to the admin tools. I guarantee them it will be a boring stakeout,
278:
Thanks very much for your contributions. I have an article on Qiyama but am personally busy and can't summarize it. I would be thankful if you could help me. I can send it through email. If you could help me, please send me an email and I'll reply you back (I can not attach it from wikipedia email.)
1462:
2) No, what I see is one editor getting too involved in the affairs of another editor. Being an edgy, sarcastic, hateful bitch myself and not inclined to call a spade an entrenching tool for earthworking, I see what you're doing as a bitchy little jab. You're more mature than that. You should stop.
1439:
has been in existence since
February, 2005. Given the number of people who have graduated from the school, the size and prominence of its college football program over the decades, and the number of professors who qualify for articles on them over the years of the school, its scope would seem to be
1384:
I also think that the sort of commentary that you offered above offers much room for doing yourself harm. You see, you and I had several differences of opinion on the MfD page for the poem, one of which centered around my belief that your initial 'keep' vote spoke of vagarities that weren't backed
1303:, and yes I have interests in it. Only, I need to know what I have to do to be in the group, I have never be a part of a group/project here and my english can make me shy sometimes lol... I just hope I can be "ok", you know. Just answer me to this and if it's alright for you, I would like to join!
1161:
what exactly the Kindness Campaign did. She said something to the effect that members try to act with kindness, with the hope that the spirit of goodwill rubs off on others and encourages those others to act with kindness as well. A very freeform, decentralised project, as opposed to the structured
1156:
I think I had mentally combined your comments about the "arrogance and determination of (Esperanzans) to set themselves apart" and the merger content, so I'm sorry for confusing the two and insinuating something that you didn't intend. By the same token, I never meant that programs of general moral
1148:
I'm not sure what to say regarding the suggestion that people ignore regular Knowledge norms when they enter Esperanza. I'm still not sure what the advisory council actually does, so I can't answer that question either. As has been pointed out to me several times, participation in Knowledge process
1107:
I still think that an off-Knowledge coffee lounge that has an obvious link on Esperanza's page is the best way to satisfy those users who like to spend their time in the lounge, and still address the concerns of those who are opposed to its presence on Knowledge. What's one more click of the mouse?
421:
by your actions on the proposed barnstar page. Please stop hounding those who disagree with you. I have noticed that on your talk page you indicated that you had to take a break from wikipedia because you became sick. I submit to you that it may be because you (1) believe that somehow you can call
2044:
Well I've started so should finish (as they say). Yeah, I'll join the project :). Do you have a view as to the standard of source needed for a reference? A lot of people (especially on the bisexual only list) are referenced to NNDB articles, which seem rather flimsy evidence. I don't see that as a
1388:
Or, to be much more succinct, if a cop has a personal grudge against a perp, he may not be the best one to keep an eye on that perp in the future. Entirely apart from the issue of whether the perp needs monitoring or not — I don't feel, as the "perp" in question, that I do, but whatever — the cop
319:
I just noticed that evrik proposed (and had passed) a Human Rights Barnstar. When I looked at that category, I noticed that there were far less categories under human rights than LGBT, whiuch I've pointed out on the discussion page of proposed Barnstars. I also asked why there seems to be a double
1103:
talk page under the heading "Esperanza", so I'm sorry if you feel this was an intrusion of your privacy (or Elaragirl's). I wanted to remind you that there is a spectrum of individual editors who claim affiliation with Esperanza, and some editors, how shall I say this? contribute less towards the
1372:
Davenbelle (talk • contribs), Stereotek (talk • contribs), and Fadix (talk • contribs) monitored Cool Cat (talk • contribs) with the view to bringing problems he caused to the attention of the community. However, this has tipped over into effectively "wikistalking" or "hounding" Cool Cat, and so
1252:
I read WP, and fix errors I find. When I fix an error I like to fix all instances of it, sometimes this can be done by hand, sometimes it has to be. Where possible I get my bot (SmackBot) to do it, but even then I will run a few hundred edits testing the process. For example almost every album
801:
I don't "hate" Esperanza, and I've been villified, rudely emailed, rudely insulted, and had my motives and even my good faith questioned too many times to take much of that organization at face value. Natalya is an excellent contributor. Editor-At-Large and Kyoko have personal issues that are so
344:
I have no idea why the LGBT project page is so dead. There seem to be only a few active users there. It's a shame, really, since there is so much to do there. When looking at the LGBT project userboxes, there are a lot of people who are listed as members, but I guess there's a difference between
1165:
If you're wondering what my position is, I personally would have no objections to Esperanza having no governance at all. In that sense, my proposal of a merger between the Kindness Campaign and Esperanza was meant in the sense that people would sign up as a pledge to try to live up to certain
797:
as an excellent idea. Over time, though, the group reached out to people, and too many of the ones who took up their cause were what I like to call "social editors". They aren't bad people, but they see editing/writing/maintaining as secondary to their ideal of what it should be like. Most of
445:
About the notice board: I agree it doesn't do much to add to the project, but wonder if it really distracts, since there has been almost no activity on it for months. If you have any ideas about how to jumpstart the project, I'm all ears and will be happy to help. Take care, and I am sending
436:
First, don't let the bastards get you down, Dev. You were unfairly attacked on a personal level, and I will give you my complete support if Badbill does, in fact, seek arbitration. After what I saw on the Barnstar page, I think now that there is, indeed, an agenda behind it all. If you go to
375:
Hello Dev, my apologies if the criticism of the LGBT barnstar seems a bit rough. Honestly any barnstar that has been proposed always is likely to be contested in order to see how much the community is certain in the desire to add it. The barnstar I have proposed for Wildlife faces similar
330:
I have no intention of accusing anybody of anything. I will discuss what I see as a marginalizing of the LGBT community's contributions to wiki, however. one interesting thing I just noticed, though: The Scouting Barnstar, which evrik was passionate about keeping, was demoted to a project
1482:
MfD, yet you weren't acting in bad faith. I try not to accuse or assume anything about anyone cuz I don't give a damn, but that's me. I'm not ordering you or warning you or anything else except saying you could do better things with your time instead of pulling a Calton. And you know it.
132:
Hey Dev. Forgive me for being so amazingly mindless/stupid/forgetful, but might you happen to recall the name of that page about not adding adjectives to your vote? I want to copy it to my sandbox and start writing something. Sorry I had to ask, but it's long and I can't remember it.
798:
Esperanza is inclusionist, eventualist, with a focus on softer, more social issues and a penchant for trying to do things their way. The problem is that these tendencies, when combined with the certainty that Esperanza does good things for everyone since it helped them, is groupthink.
2028:
Just wanted to congratulate you on how great the A-E section of this list looks- both in terms of layout and thorough referencing. I've been trying to sort out the lack of references in the other pages and am starting to understand what a mammoth task it is to track everything down.
1978:
Hey, Dev, I noticed on some of the pages you've tagged with the LGBT Project that you're doing it with {{Template:LGBTProject|class=?}}. I'm sure it's just a copy/paste job, but you don't need the "Template:" in there, right? And it looks like we're making progress on tagging! --
460:
If you want to make some lists of things to do on the LGBT project, I'd be happy to start cleaning things up there--that could be fun... after the Esperanza situation gets resolved, of course. I'm sure you are busy with that right now. I was just reading about it today.
973:
Section 2: Purpose. Esperzana is there to generate editor productivity through stress reduction and having a place for editors to talk and relax. This don't include dog barking noises or games, but alerts and noticeboards of stressed people and Civility Patrolling is
792:
1) You got an LGBT Barnstar? Rock on. 2) Esperzana has a bit of a rift, as best as I can see it. The original organization was founded by some very strong contributors to Esperanza, many of whom were longstanding community members with tens of thousands of edits. It
1405:
someone breathing down my neck, it's someone with no personal history with me and someone with the sole intention of keeping Knowledge free of "perps." This helps you by knowing that if I ever do do something that is quite thoroughly out of line, the charge will
441:
you'll see that evrik has reacted negatively about LGBT issues in the past (I found that page when I was looking over the LGBT notice board you feel needs to be deleted). We'll have to wait and see what happens, but hopefully others will chime in with support.
1157:
support should be brought under the control of Esperanza. I should also mention that I am a member of all three projects mentioned — Esperanza, the Kindness Campaign, and Concordia — so I am an interested party from the non-Esperanza side as well. I once asked
949:
Hey, the whole thing has come to resemble one big crash site, though not as bad as I thought it would turn out to be. Anyway, masterworks are usually formed out of the fires of adversity, and it would be good to see Esperanza fixed and made more productive:
1380:
So, I suggest this to you. You obviously think I'm some sort of troll, villainess, or sockmuppet. Fine. I accept your opinion, or, rather, I accept the fact that I cannot change a stranger's opinion of me. I'm also not going to live in fear of you.
1458:
1) I am not fool enough to name the names of angsty admins insecure in their sexual nature who are overprotective of some LGBT articles. If you look , you will find. Since Whedonette doesn't identify with the Movement, it was a warning in good faith.
657:
everyone. Also, those people who have stated it is "gaming the system" apparently have not looked in on actual admin coaching sessions. Could you provide links to where users have been taught how to game the system while under admin coaching?
745:
349:
Thanks for your support on the Baker article. I was rather surprised that several people on the Wiki biography project supported it as a FA, but *nobody* from the LGBT project did, though a LGBT Project sticker did get slapped on its talk
1397:
attention. You see, I'm sick of the fighting — thus the reason why I left the MfD — and I don't want you following me around, breathing down my neck, and picking fights with me whenever I do something you personally don't feel is right.
1908:
I like the Bi template, but do you think you can make one of Transgendered, too? Just so we don't give the appearance of exclusionism.....and by the way, can you believe anyone could get worked up over a pretty little flag?????????????
482:
are somehow anti-LGBT, they need to read a little closer. Evrik's arguments are against introducing a non-neutral point of view into the article without any reliable sources. To think otherwise is to find conspiracy where this is none.
1444:, it is hard to question the development of other smaller projects at this point, and certainly perhaps more than a little out of line to question the creation of an award on the basis of questioning the existence of the project.
1339:, and who can take appropriate action as they see fit. I have come across, in my travels on Knowledge, the word "wikistalking." Plugging it into Google while limiting the search to Knowledge pages yielded the following quote
1413:
If you don't agree to this and instead plan to follow me around to "watch my contributions from now on," then let me know, and we'll escalate this thing as appropriate in whatever channels are appropriate here on Knowledge. —
1112:
all three groups. I was unaware that Esperanza had a prior history of attempting mergers in the past. If you feel that my suggestion was naive and arrogant, chalk it up to my own shortsightedness, not to Esperanza as a whole.
1115:
I know that we may differ in our views of what to do with Esperanza, but at least the MfD and in particular comments by you, Elaragirl, and others, have given the impetus for Esperanza to examine itself. Thank you for that.
70:
Your long titled subpage that discusses not putting adjectives into your vote is incredibly hilarious, yet entirely true. You might consider expanding that into an essay...it could be worth something. Funny, nonetheless.
1082:
Feel free to place this award on your user page, as a token of appreciation for your contributions. If you're willing to help spread the good cheer to others, please see the project page for the Random Smiley Award at:
1324:
Coming in on Elara's sockpuppetry point, I will be watching your contributions from now on. Please consider editing more in the main article namespace if you are not a sockpuppet, as your current history looks deeply
938:
You devil!! I'll...nah, no problem. Just to say I appreciate your contributions to the EA debate - always a little fiery, but in good faith and for what you think is best - which is usually right. Keep going! Cheers,
260:
Sorry if I came across as biting your head off, I don't think you or FishUtah intended to come across as uncivil, I've just seen a lot of unnecessary hostility recently, so I was quick to jump in and try to stop it.
153:
Hey, thanks! It's a great concept to write about. If we happen to use my Forum idea for a new Lounge, then that'll be a great place to discuss this. Still can't get over how good an idea this is... thanks again!
1144:
Hi Dev920, thanks for your message and especially for your well wishes about my depression. I'm currently taking both medication and receiving therapy for that, and it helps. It's not an instant fix, but it helps.
700:
I think it needs a strong governance to help make our goal a clear one, and make sure that things are properly organised and overseen. Its not crucial, but I think it would help a lot - as it does at the moment -
1152:
I'm sorry that you were the target of name-calling. Behaviour like that goes against what Esperanza is supposed to be, and resorting to such actions only weakens the arguments of whoever is saying them.
2050:
On a separate point, I'm amazed at how resistant editors are to providing references. Why argue so hard to list people without them when you could spend the time actually tracking down a proper source?
980:
Section 4: Each program (outreach , alerts, campaign for kittens and snuggles, etc) will have ONE person overseeing it. These people will answer directly to Natalya. Once a year, Natalya picks new ones.
1563:
By far the best way to get more members is by efficient placement of talk-page banners. (Before WPMILHIST developed its banner, it had only gathered about a dozen members in two years of existence.)
291:. I had to remove it because of copyvio but you can see the link :) And the most accurate section on Islamic belief should be Ma'ad(returning to God), not Qiyama, though these are related. Cheers, --
986:
Section 6: Any placement of kittens by an Esperanzan on Elaragirl's userpage will result in immediate MfD for all Esperanzan pages, user pages, and userboxes. Repeat offenders will be subjected to
360:
I'm not sure I know what you mean about the "notice board". Do you mean the discussion page of the Project page? Or the Project page itself? And I will message a few members after dinner
2000:
Not a big deal - I've been rating as I go, anyway, so not a problem. Only one new member, eh? And we've really only been tagging for a day or three, so I guess that's pretty good! --
345:
listing yourself as member and actually working on a project. Do you think it might be useful to leave a few messages about the Barnstar on some of the more active user's talk pages?
621:
1939:
56:
you appeared to be intentionally adding misspellings. Looking through the diffs, it looks like you reverted to a previous version with misspellings. Sorry for the confusion! --
1436:
1104:
mainspace than others. As for the governance issue, I personally don't understand the current structure and I don't feel as if they exert any influence on me at any rate.
530:
1711:
662:(which I think happens and will continue to happen, simply because Esperanzans who see someone who has gone through AC and is up at RfA will immediately vote for them)
686:
Yes, if you're not busy, I would appreciate it. If you are busy, please wait a few more days until I am done with the arbitration and I'll do it myself. Thanks. :)
305:
Oh, whatever you think best. I just ran across it and wanted to make sure it had a category of some kind on it; generally a stub is the fastest way to do that. --
1799:
all look like whichever is your preference to you, but they're all specified differently in the code. It just means people always get the date the way they prefer.
1611:
At this point, you need to create the categories yourself. There was some discussion of automating the process, but I don't think that's gone anywhere yet.
641:
Thanks for your contributions to the recent discussions on Esperanza. I think a reformation of the organization is in order, and I appreciate your efforts.
1577:
Once you're comfortable with those, and have gathered some more members, you can go for the more time-intensive things like project peer reviews and such.
1566:
For a small project, trying to emulate all the complicated structure of a large one is overkill. I would initially limit your efforts to two main areas:
1186:
Let me also add that your compassion proves that you aren't "robotic", "cold-hearted", "heartless" or any of the other epithets that were given to you. --
778:
Updating your Barnstar, so you now have the proper award and not just the "temporary" Barnstar while it was still a proposal. Boldness is good, Dev!
456:
If you need any help with the mediation (I don't know how the process works) feel free to call on me. I do feel he unfairly provoked and attacked you.
2022:
243:
624:
before noticing your request for closure. Sorry about that; I closed it now, so feel free to open whatever discussion you think might be useful.
92:
Forgive me if I'm being overly forward/serious/neurotic but I'd be glad to help out in writing an essay on it...that would be a great idea.
1894:
Thank you for the offer about joining the project, but I'd say I'd have to decline. :) I haven't been very active on Knowledge lately. --
1389:
staking out the perp needs to be free from possible charges of bias or taint, or else the case against the perp is significantly weakened.
913:
2045:
source in the A-E section. Is there agreement that sites like NNDB are not a good enough source for listing someone by sexual orientation?
897:
1690:
1676:
1669:
1644:
1300:
1120:
1686:
has been revamped and tidied. It's various sections could do with updating on a weekly basis. Please pitch in if you have the time.
112:
I would want to start it on my sandbox, if you don't mind me stealing it :). You'd receive full credit for inspiration, though.
182:
1241:
May I ask how you have acquired an edit count of over 150,000? What do you do on Knowledge? You must feel utterly exhuasted!
1868:
Speaking of tweaking the banner, I changed the image on it. Let me know if you think we should stay with the plain flag. --
386:
648:
If the purpose of admin coaching is to educate users on how to edit, but everyone else is accusing you of gaming the system
2010:
1989:
1878:
1842:
1441:
805:
I'm sorry to write so much, but all too often people try to condense shit into a phrase and the issue is very nuanced. --
529:
to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage,
1580:
On a final note: having a good navigation template will do wonders for drawing editors to various parts of the project.
1668:
This is the first newsletter of the LGBT studies Wikiproject! Come and discuss your thoughts on it at the Wikiproject
910:
1700:
402:
384:
1258:
1945:
Since you commented on the Hinduism barnstar proposal I recommend you looking at the new designs introduced by
1534:
1497:
1089:
1084:
1026:
853:
819:
1192:
1175:
1129:
1166:
standards, that's all. I do think that programs like the Stress Alerts page play an important role, though.
987:
43:
1208:
Your proposal on the arbitration page sufficiently answers that question, does it not? Have a nice day.
716:
702:
625:
497:
484:
396:
378:
193:
162:
141:
120:
100:
79:
1968:
1420:
1255:
1714:
on the WikiProject talk page about how to get the WikiProject going. Your thoughts would be welcome.
1253:
article has been modified by SmackBot , but there are other changes that can't be fully automated.
1187:
1170:
1124:
1612:
1599:
1595:
1585:
1556:
1058:
247:
1559:
will probably be of general use, even though it's incomplete. As far as your specific questions:
1920:
over it. And for the sake of clarity, I think if somebody says "I don't want to come across as a
1730:
1696:
1445:
1283:
1064:
760:
715:
Depending on the length of suspension, I suppose it would be OK. But I like the current system -
423:
332:
292:
280:
928:
2006:
1985:
1956:
1874:
1838:
991:
977:
Section 3: FFS, there is no council. Natalya may execute whoever generates dog barking noises.
598:
590:
39:
464:
Anyway, I am off to bed now. It's getting on midnight here, and I've worked 6 days in a row.
1895:
1816:
1803:
1768:
1767:
Being my usual, picky self, could you wikify the date in future newsletters, please? ;o) —
1746:
1527:
1490:
1019:
951:
846:
812:
561:
188:
157:
136:
115:
95:
74:
17:
1796:
1134:
1415:
479:
438:
418:
1679:
has been created for editors who have contributed significantly to LGBT-related articles.
763:, part of the LGBT project on Knowledge, during its successful FA candidacy. Thank you!
2052:
2030:
1946:
1921:
1522:
1485:
1100:
1014:
841:
807:
211:
57:
47:
35:
1777:
It means that users' preferences control the date format. Edit this section and see:
1734:
1722:
1435:
Please be advised, as per your comment on the proposed project awards page, that the
1209:
1053:
983:
Section 5: Anyone being a dick or unproductive gets the boot and their green E taken.
955:
940:
905:
875:
871:
687:
671:
531:
Knowledge:Requests for mediation/Wikipedia:Barnstar and award proposals/New Proposals
526:
262:
2001:
1980:
1950:
1869:
1833:
1311:
1304:
1227:
667:
involved in Esperanza, and many Esperanzans have failed RFA, even multiple times.
594:
653:
There are a few users who believe it is "gaming the system", but it is certainly
1929:
1910:
1858:
1752:
1726:
1718:
1704:
1683:
1263:
1242:
925:
779:
764:
554:
465:
447:
361:
351:
336:
321:
306:
225:
215:
31:
2060:
2038:
2015:
1994:
1959:
1940:
Knowledge:Barnstar_and_award_proposals/New_Proposals#Hinduism_WikiProject_Award
1932:
1913:
1898:
1883:
1861:
1847:
1819:
1806:
1771:
1615:
1602:
1588:
1542:
1505:
1448:
1425:
1286:
1246:
1230:
1212:
1197:
1180:
1069:
1034:
958:
943:
861:
827:
782:
767:
723:
709:
690:
676:
628:
500:
487:
468:
450:
426:
404:
364:
354:
339:
324:
309:
295:
283:
265:
250:
228:
218:
200:
169:
148:
127:
107:
86:
60:
1785:
1778:
836:
644:
However, I would like to discuss with you some comments you made on the page:
475:
1342:
from an Arbitration Committee decision, which may be of special note to you:
759:
The LGBT Barnstar is hereby awarded to Dev920 for her support of the article
52:
Hi... As I was investigating this I had a feeling you'd ask about this... In
1635:
1158:
744:
1745:
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format,
1410:
and there is no chance nor opportunity for anything backlashing upon you.
1857:
rock, Dev, and are my favorite Wiki contributor. Keep up the good fight!
1361:
There are hundreds of administrators available to monitor problem users.
1007:
597:
to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please
1340:
954:, right? Thanks again for devoting your time and helping out. Cheers,
517:
1928:.....", generally speaking they know they are acting like a WP:Dick.
1693:
has also undergone a bit of a rewrite. Your participation is welcome.
1471:
I will drop the hammer on her. I might point out that people accused
1006:
and is for the purpose of humor. Humor impaired inDUHviduals should
1310:
OK :-) I want to join! Can you just tell me... how please? Thanks!
887:
210:
It's really not ok to have vote-soliciation in your signature; see
1751:
If you have any news or any announcements to be broadcast, do let
1373:
disrupting Knowledge and discouraging his positive contributions.
1223:
My response to your ArbCom post. Thank you and straight strength.
1045:
ATTENTION: A Poll will be conducted for all proposals starting at
1792:
1788:
1781:
1266:
26:
Please, leave me a message. I am happy to be help or be helped.
417:
You are very very close, if not in fact crossing the line, of
1634:
1569:
Getting together an effective to-do list/announcement board.
886:
970:
Section 1: Natalya as Supreme Esperanzan Happiness Dicator.
42:
for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the
1119:
Since I've typed this much, I might as well invite you to
1099:
Hello Dev920, I couldn't help but notice your comments on
990:. Serial offenders will be required to source the article
370:
1393:
but if you honestly feel I need observation, bring it to
1123:. Thanks again for your participation in all of this. --
1224:
1051:
289:
53:
46:
to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
1717:
Finally, five new users have joined the Wikiproject:
1169:
I hope this clarfies how I feel about all of this. --
610:
This message delivered: 04:15, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
242:
I was looking for something to do, and I found this
1437:
Knowledge:WikiProject Pennsylvania State University
474:I just happened to see this because I was watching
1699:became the first known LGBT biography to become a
1703:on November 22. It was written and nominated by
1330:Dev920, I am sending a link to this response to
1049:; please remember to debate the ideas beforehand
952:The crooked straight, and the rough places plain
478:'s page. If anyone thinks that Evrik's posts to
34:on Knowledge. Your test worked, and it has been
1802:But bloody good work on the newsletter :o) —
1594:You need to add the code to the template; see
1299:Hello! Thanks to ask me if I want to join the
1277:Comment regarding your closing of the barnstar
8:
1193:
1176:
1130:
1467:Whedonette is a sockpuppet and it's proven
1095:about your comment on Elaragirl's talk page
593:, an automated bot account operated by the
1853:Allow me to second SatyrTN's comment! you
882:
512:
30:Thank you for experimenting with the page
1633:
1318:Response to Your Comment on My Talk Page
599:contact the Mediation Committee directly
2023:List of gay, lesbian or bisexual people
1401:This helps me by knowing that if there
1334:Doug Bell, who are both administrators
244:User:Dev920/Userproject:Jake Gyllenhaal
1743:
742:
371:Don't Worry I Won't "Have-a-go-at-Dev"
1596:WP:PROJGUIDE#Advanced project banners
7:
1551:Re: Your advice would be appreciated
446:electronic happy thoughts your way!
1002:The above statement is intended as
432:This, that, and the other thing :-)
1010:if they take offence to this post.
895:Thank you for your support of the
24:
1535:
1523:
1498:
1486:
1140:re: your message, Esperanza, etc.
1027:
1015:
854:
842:
820:
808:
1737:. Please make them feel welcome!
1572:Starting up article assessments.
743:
516:
214:. Can you please remove it? --
1763:Comments on the LGBT newsletter
1516:I'm rude and unpleasant too. I
1350:violation of required courtesy.
1065:
909:was selected to be improved to
562:
555:
1815:Thanks, and no worries :o) —
1528:
1521:
1491:
1484:
1475:of bad faith in the Esperanza
1188:
1171:
1125:
1020:
1013:
934:How dare you steal my proposal
847:
840:
813:
806:
206:Vote solicitation in signature
1:
1442:Knowledge:WikiProject The KLF
1287:01:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
1247:21:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
1231:11:49, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
1213:17:45, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
1198:23:05, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
1181:22:32, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
1135:20:38, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
1070:17:55, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
1059:
1035:17:15, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
965:My Esperanza Charter Proposal
959:18:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
944:16:48, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
929:16:22, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
869:
862:15:40, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
828:14:08, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
783:10:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
768:10:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
724:20:47, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
710:19:56, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
691:17:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
677:23:52, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
629:05:22, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
501:02:34, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
488:02:26, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
469:22:38, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
451:21:40, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
427:20:51, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
405:20:38, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
387:20:22, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
365:18:24, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
355:18:17, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
340:17:54, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
325:14:32, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
310:08:55, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
296:03:36, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
284:03:10, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
266:02:08, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
251:01:04, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
229:00:39, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
219:23:15, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
201:01:06, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
170:22:41, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
149:22:37, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
128:00:41, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
108:00:37, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
87:00:33, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
61:22:25, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
50:22:20, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
2061:23:40, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
2039:23:20, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
2016:22:54, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
1995:22:47, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
1960:22:24, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
1933:21:14, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
1914:20:59, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
1899:15:22, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
1890:Re: WikiProject LGBT studies
1884:08:05, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
1862:10:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
1848:07:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
1820:10:20, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
1807:21:39, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
1772:13:29, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
1616:18:17, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
1603:17:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
1589:02:21, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
1543:22:35, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
1520:to be treated as such. :p --
1506:21:52, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
1449:16:33, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
1426:06:03, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
1204:Your Proposal on Arbitration
608:
551:For the Mediation Committee,
1712:discussion has been started
1651:Issue I - December 4, 2006
1627:LGBT WikiProject Newsletter
1162:project that is Esperanza.
1054:
246:so I thought waht the hell.
185:. Tell me what you think!
2077:
1656:
1121:review me at editor review
589:This message delivered by
1237:Your very high edit count
1094:
1090:User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward1
1040:Esperanza Charter Debates
898:Article Improvement Drive
749:
212:Knowledge:Spam#Canvassing
1645:LGBT studies WikiProject
1301:WikiProject LGBT studies
1295:WikiProject LGBT studies
1085:User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward
696:RE: Esperanza Governance
620:I made a comment on the
181:Hey! I wrote it; it's
38:or removed. Please use
1639:
1047:12:01 December 1, 2006
891:
673:Firsfron of Ronchester
496:Thanks for your note.
1747:please drop me a line
1689:The main page of the
1638:
890:
527:Request for Mediation
509:Request for Mediation
719:• The Giant Puffin •
705:• The Giant Puffin •
682:Merging Muslim Guild
413:As per your request:
288:Here is the article
1480:removal of shitcrud
1245:(Have a nice day!)
918:Hope you can help.
835:Then again...check
595:Mediation Committee
394:Check my talk page.
335:. Have you read it?
1697:James Robert Baker
1640:
1314:, 7 December 2006
1307:, 3 December 2006
892:
870:You helped choose
761:James Robert Baker
602:
398:¤~Persian Poet Gal
380:¤~Persian Poet Gal
333:James Robert Baker
51:
1760:
1759:
1707:. Well done Jeff!
1584:Hope that helps!
1557:WikiProject guide
1540:
1503:
1424:
1338:
1032:
1011:
992:Cleveland Steamer
922:
921:
859:
825:
773:
772:
753:The LGBT Barnstar
607:
606:
603:
588:
566:
224:Thank you! :) --
29:
2068:
2014:
1993:
1973:
1967:
1882:
1846:
1832:You Rock! :) --
1701:Featured Article
1631:
1630:
1541:
1539:
1537:
1532:
1525:
1504:
1502:
1500:
1495:
1488:
1431:Size of projects
1418:
1335:
1332:Elaragirl and to
1195:
1190:
1178:
1173:
1132:
1127:
1067:
1061:
1056:
1033:
1031:
1029:
1024:
1017:
998:
988:Extreme Deletion
911:featured article
883:
860:
858:
856:
851:
844:
826:
824:
822:
817:
810:
747:
740:
739:
721:
707:
674:
626:Opabinia regalis
587:
570:
568:
564:
559:
520:
513:
256:Sorry about that
196:
191:
165:
160:
144:
139:
123:
118:
103:
98:
82:
77:
18:User talk:Dev920
2076:
2075:
2071:
2070:
2069:
2067:
2066:
2065:
2026:
2004:
1983:
1976:
1971:
1965:
1943:
1906:
1892:
1872:
1836:
1830:
1765:
1663:
1649:
1629:
1553:
1456:
1433:
1320:
1297:
1279:
1239:
1220:
1206:
1142:
1097:
1080:
1042:
967:
936:
923:
880:
874:as this week's
790:
735:
717:
703:
698:
684:
672:
636:
618:
613:
553:
511:
480:Talk:John Bosco
439:Talk:John Bosco
434:
415:
373:
317:
303:
273:
258:
240:
208:
194:
189:
163:
158:
142:
137:
121:
116:
101:
96:
80:
75:
68:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2074:
2072:
2064:
2063:
2047:
2046:
2025:
2020:
2019:
2018:
1975:
1963:
1947:User:Priyanath
1942:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1905:
1902:
1891:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1865:
1864:
1829:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1823:
1822:
1810:
1809:
1800:
1764:
1761:
1758:
1757:
1750:
1741:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1715:
1708:
1694:
1687:
1680:
1673:
1665:
1664:
1662:
1659:
1654:
1653:
1652:
1650:
1641:
1628:
1625:
1623:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1613:Kirill Lokshin
1606:
1605:
1600:Kirill Lokshin
1586:Kirill Lokshin
1582:
1581:
1578:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1570:
1564:
1552:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1455:
1452:
1432:
1429:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1328:
1327:
1319:
1316:
1296:
1293:
1291:
1278:
1275:
1273:
1271:
1270:
1238:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1219:
1216:
1205:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1141:
1138:
1096:
1093:
1079:
1076:
1074:
1041:
1038:
996:
995:
984:
981:
978:
975:
971:
966:
963:
962:
961:
935:
932:
920:
919:
917:
902:
893:
881:
879:
868:
867:
866:
865:
864:
789:
786:
775:
771:
770:
756:
755:
750:
748:
734:
731:
729:
727:
726:
697:
694:
683:
680:
635:
634:Admin Coaching
632:
617:
614:
605:
604:
586:
585:
584:
583:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
523:
521:
510:
507:
506:
505:
504:
503:
491:
490:
458:
457:
433:
430:
414:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
372:
369:
368:
367:
347:
346:
342:
316:
315:More LGBT talk
313:
302:
299:
272:
269:
257:
254:
248:Stevenscollege
239:
236:
234:
232:
231:
207:
204:
179:
178:
177:
176:
175:
174:
173:
172:
67:
64:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2073:
2062:
2059:
2058:
2055:
2049:
2048:
2043:
2042:
2041:
2040:
2037:
2036:
2033:
2024:
2021:
2017:
2012:
2008:
2003:
1999:
1998:
1997:
1996:
1991:
1987:
1982:
1970:
1964:
1962:
1961:
1958:
1957:
1954:
1953:
1949:. Thank you.
1948:
1941:
1938:
1934:
1931:
1927:
1923:
1918:
1917:
1916:
1915:
1912:
1903:
1901:
1900:
1897:
1889:
1885:
1880:
1876:
1871:
1867:
1866:
1863:
1860:
1856:
1852:
1851:
1850:
1849:
1844:
1840:
1835:
1828:By the way...
1827:
1821:
1818:
1814:
1813:
1812:
1811:
1808:
1805:
1801:
1798:
1794:
1790:
1787:
1783:
1780:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1770:
1762:
1756:
1754:
1748:
1742:
1736:
1732:
1731:AliceJMarkham
1728:
1724:
1720:
1716:
1713:
1709:
1706:
1702:
1698:
1695:
1692:
1688:
1685:
1681:
1678:
1677:LGBT Barnstar
1674:
1671:
1667:
1666:
1660:
1658:
1657:
1655:
1648:
1646:
1637:
1632:
1626:
1624:
1617:
1614:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1604:
1601:
1597:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1590:
1587:
1579:
1576:
1571:
1568:
1567:
1565:
1562:
1561:
1560:
1558:
1550:
1544:
1538:
1533:
1531:
1526:
1519:
1515:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1501:
1496:
1494:
1489:
1481:
1478:
1474:
1470:
1466:
1460:
1453:
1451:
1450:
1447:
1446:Badbilltucker
1443:
1438:
1430:
1428:
1427:
1422:
1417:
1411:
1409:
1404:
1399:
1396:
1390:
1386:
1382:
1374:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1362:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1351:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1326:
1322:
1321:
1317:
1315:
1313:
1308:
1306:
1302:
1294:
1292:
1289:
1288:
1285:
1284:Badbilltucker
1276:
1274:
1268:
1265:
1261:
1260:
1257:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1244:
1236:
1232:
1229:
1225:
1222:
1221:
1217:
1215:
1214:
1211:
1203:
1199:
1196:
1191:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1179:
1174:
1167:
1163:
1160:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1139:
1137:
1136:
1133:
1128:
1122:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1102:
1092:
1091:
1087:
1086:
1077:
1075:
1072:
1071:
1068:
1062:
1057:
1052:
1050:
1048:
1039:
1037:
1036:
1030:
1025:
1023:
1018:
1009:
1005:
1001:
993:
989:
985:
982:
979:
976:
972:
969:
968:
964:
960:
957:
953:
948:
947:
946:
945:
942:
933:
931:
930:
927:
915:
912:
908:
907:
906:Rosetta Stone
900:
899:
894:
889:
885:
884:
877:
873:
872:Rosetta Stone
863:
857:
852:
850:
845:
838:
834:
833:
832:
831:
830:
829:
823:
818:
816:
811:
803:
799:
796:
787:
785:
784:
781:
776:
769:
766:
762:
758:
757:
754:
751:
746:
741:
738:
732:
730:
725:
722:
720:
714:
713:
712:
711:
708:
706:
695:
693:
692:
689:
681:
679:
678:
675:
670:Best wishes,
668:
664:
663:
659:
656:
651:
649:
645:
642:
639:
633:
631:
630:
627:
623:
622:Concordia MfD
616:Concordia MfD
615:
611:
600:
596:
592:
569:
560:
558:
552:
549:
548:
547:
546:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
532:
528:
524:
522:
519:
515:
514:
508:
502:
499:
495:
494:
493:
492:
489:
486:
481:
477:
473:
472:
471:
470:
467:
462:
455:
454:
453:
452:
449:
443:
440:
431:
429:
428:
425:
424:Badbilltucker
420:
412:
406:
403:
401:
400:
399:
393:
392:
391:
390:
389:
388:
385:
383:
382:
381:
366:
363:
359:
358:
357:
356:
353:
343:
341:
338:
334:
329:
328:
327:
326:
323:
314:
312:
311:
308:
300:
298:
297:
294:
290:
286:
285:
282:
276:
270:
268:
267:
264:
255:
253:
252:
249:
245:
237:
235:
230:
227:
223:
222:
221:
220:
217:
213:
205:
203:
202:
199:
198:
197:
192:
184:
171:
168:
167:
166:
161:
152:
151:
150:
147:
146:
145:
140:
131:
130:
129:
126:
125:
124:
119:
111:
110:
109:
106:
105:
104:
99:
91:
90:
89:
88:
85:
84:
83:
78:
66:Made me laugh
65:
63:
62:
59:
55:
49:
45:
41:
37:
33:
27:
19:
2056:
2053:
2034:
2031:
2027:
1977:
1955:
1951:
1944:
1925:
1907:
1904:New Template
1893:
1854:
1831:
1766:
1744:
1661:Project News
1642:
1622:
1583:
1554:
1529:
1517:
1513:
1492:
1479:
1477:trashburning
1476:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1461:
1457:
1434:
1412:
1407:
1402:
1400:
1394:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1371:
1360:
1348:
1336:
1331:
1329:
1323:
1309:
1298:
1290:
1280:
1272:
1264:25 November
1254:
1240:
1207:
1168:
1164:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1098:
1088:
1081:
1078:Smiley Award
1073:
1046:
1044:
1043:
1021:
1003:
999:
997:
937:
924:
904:
896:
848:
814:
804:
800:
794:
791:
777:
774:
752:
736:
728:
718:
704:
699:
685:
669:
665:
661:
660:
654:
652:
647:
646:
643:
640:
637:
619:
609:
591:MediationBot
556:
550:
463:
459:
444:
435:
416:
397:
395:
379:
377:
374:
348:
318:
304:
287:
277:
274:
259:
241:
233:
209:
187:
186:
180:
156:
155:
135:
134:
114:
113:
94:
93:
73:
72:
69:
44:welcome page
28:
25:
1969:LGBTProject
1896:AshyRaccoon
1817:OwenBlacker
1804:OwenBlacker
1769:OwenBlacker
1691:Wikiproject
1684:LGBT Portal
1647:Newsletter!
1101:Elaragirl's
1008:find a clue
498:Mike Dillon
485:Mike Dillon
40:the sandbox
32:Latter Days
1786:December 6
1779:6 December
1416:Whedonette
1259:Farmbrough
903:This week
476:User:Evrik
1670:talk page
839:. Wow. --
279:Thanks --
58:Ginkgo100
54:this edit
48:Ginkgo100
2011:contribs
1990:contribs
1879:contribs
1843:contribs
1735:WereWolf
1723:Ikasawak
1454:Comments
1325:suspect.
1262:, 21:54
1210:BhaiSaab
1000:Warning:
956:Moreschi
941:Moreschi
837:this out
733:Barnstar
688:BhaiSaab
638:Hi Dev,
419:WP:CIVIL
350:page :-)
275:Hi Dev,
263:Lethargy
36:reverted
2002:SatyrTN
1981:SatyrTN
1974:tagging
1922:WP:Dick
1870:SatyrTN
1834:SatyrTN
1312:DaliJim
1305:DaliJim
1228:Hkelkar
1004:sarcasm
795:started
301:Scarlet
271:Qiyamah
2057:scribe
2035:scribe
1930:Jeffpw
1911:Jeffpw
1859:Jeffpw
1755:know.
1753:Dev920
1733:, and
1727:Dev920
1719:Jeffpw
1705:Jeffpw
1598:. ;-)
1518:demand
1269:(GMT).
1243:Dev920
1218:ArbCom
1063:Zach|
926:AzaBot
914:status
878:winner
876:WP:AID
780:Jeffpw
765:Jeffpw
557:Essjay
466:Jeffpw
448:Jeffpw
362:Jeffpw
352:Jeffpw
337:Jeffpw
322:Jeffpw
307:SCZenz
238:Maggie
226:SCZenz
216:SCZenz
195:Day349
164:Day349
143:Day349
122:Day349
102:Day349
81:Day349
1952:Gizza
1797:12-06
1408:stick
1395:their
788:Reply
293:Aminz
281:Aminz
190:Dooms
159:Dooms
138:Dooms
117:Dooms
97:Dooms
76:Dooms
16:<
2007:talk
1986:talk
1875:talk
1839:talk
1793:2006
1791:and
1789:2006
1782:2006
1682:The
1643:The
1555:The
1536:girl
1524:Elar
1514:Hey!
1499:girl
1487:Elar
1469:THEN
1421:ping
1267:2006
1256:Rich
1189:Kyok
1172:Kyok
1159:Kylu
1126:Kyok
1066:talk
1055:Wiki
1028:girl
1016:Elar
974:fine
855:girl
843:Elar
821:girl
809:Elar
650:...
565:Talk
183:here
2054:WJB
2032:WJB
1926:BUT
1675:An
1473:you
655:not
2009:|
1988:|
1972:}}
1966:{{
1924:,
1877:|
1855:do
1841:|
1784:;
1729:,
1725:,
1721:,
1710:A
1483:--
1465:IF
1403:is
1012:--
737:
533:.
525:A
261:--
2051:-
2029:-
2013:)
2005:(
1992:)
1984:(
1881:)
1873:(
1845:)
1837:(
1795:-
1749:.
1672:.
1530:a
1493:a
1423:)
1419:(
1226:.
1194:o
1177:o
1131:o
1060:e
1022:a
994:.
916:.
901:.
849:a
815:a
612:.
601:.
567:)
563:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.