Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Devalover

Source đź“ť

406:
the child prostitution trade in Philippines, sent out across some of their members and set up the child prostitution trade that now controls Cambodia. They also set up the trade in Timor. All three countries are controlled by the same gang! I believe that we will need to eventually do an article on human trafficking in Asia and link all this together. Also, these gangs work their way into legitimate businesses like hotels, restaurents, money exchange, banks, transport and so forth, in effect taking control of whole cities, with an eventual aim of taking control of whole countries. I think we have a lot of work ahead of us and look forward to working with you and the other great Editors I have met here. On a side note, pls excuse my English, my language is Tagalog as well as several local dialects in the phil, so sometimes I get a bit messy and confussed, kind regards.
343:. Editor Edgarde has exploited my absence by not keeping the neutral opening of the article that you provided for us. He has also deleted the references that we were planning to use to make citations for the article content, such as with the locations of sex tourism. Would you please present the references either in the article or so that they are easily accessible for non-biased editors to read and make new supported edits with. Also would you please restore the opening of the article to a neutral description that does not favor Edgarde's point of view. He has not respected the problems that I explained in the 362:, editors who continue the disruptive editing begun by KyndFellow are subject to blocks and bans. I'm not sure about the propriety of collaborating with a banned user. Certainly, you take responsibility for your own edits, and if you carry on KF's battles you earn KF's ban. But if he makes other suggestions, some of which you incorporate in your own edits, which are reasonable and non-disruptive, is that acceptable or not? I've asked for clarification, but in the meantime you should certainly be cautious. 322: 455:. One the the things that concerns me is when I read the Philippine section which I believe to be false and misleading information stated there and I would like to work on that section. But, I would like to branch a seperate article on Davao Death Squads, what do you think? Heres an article on this subject you may want to read. 215:
Heya Edgarde- no need to undo anything, I don't have any worries about Devalover's reputation, and the suspected sockpuppet on my page is really not a black-mark as far as I am concerned... your suspicions have been a really nice experience for me, connecting me to: compassion for your situation (the
190:
I was going with the hypothesis that Mr. Knodel was alternating between dialup and a DSL service to cover his IP tracks. If your IP address doesn't resolve to a modem pool, I'll go on record saying I no longer suspect you, and if you need a reference that says identifying you as a puppetmaster was a
145:
Here's something that would help: can you let me know how you connect to Internet? Specifically I need to know if you use dial-up or some kinda DSL. If you don't have the sort of service I think you have, I'll drop you from the accusation and move it to KyndFellow, who is now a confirmed puppeteer.
405:
Thanks for Your help in developing the article. On a side note, I guess I should add some further info on this subject to give an indication of where im thinking we should eventually progress with these articles. During the early 90`s when the United Nations was in Cambodia, the gangs that control
233:
Develover, the editor named Edgarde on the Sex Tourism page is accusing you of impersonating me in your edits on that page (using a “puppet”). I’ve made a request for arbitration in which a third-party will be asked help resolved the dispute. Would you please add a comment to the
450:
Hey Devalover, need your advice here please. I have just been down in Davao, and I wanted to do a new page on the "Davoa Death Squad" which are resonsible for the murder of children in Davao, Philippines. There is currently an article on wikipedia on death squads
384:
I certainly consider myself somewhere in between Kyndfellow and Edgarde in terms of my vision for the article. Thus far I have not felt any difficulty finding my own voice and I don't think that will be an issue. Thanks Kyndfellow for the heads up about the
216:
issue of dealing with sockpuppets); a desire to be more open and honest; and a chance to practice what for me is the most important skill of life- remaining calm, cool and present no matter what the circumstances. And so, all I can do is thank you peace
201:
Sorry to be so bitey. You've handled this with good humor and perspective, which is my biggest clue that you're not who I thought. I hope this incident doesn't put you off contributing to Knowledge (XXG)! —
125:
Note: I was the accuser on this one. I'm striking this accusation because I now believe Devalover is not who I thought he was. When this case is resolved, I'll remove it entirely unless Devalover requests
196:
I'll also look into the procedure for changing the "Suspected" page and undoing the warning on this page. I don't want to put you in the troublesome position of deleting warnings from your own page.
142:
Devalover: I'm sorry to make my first contact with you in such a bad situation, but you may be off this hook pretty soon. I don't have CehckUser privileges, so I'm waiting on feedback from others.
273: 269: 309: 434:
Initially it will probably be best to write articles based on country i.e. pedophillia in Cambodia. What you are talking about is possible, and I think involves a number of steps.
339:
Devalover, this is Mr. Knodel and I'm using my account without the signature, because I no longer wish to use my real name on this site. I was recently banned from editing
359: 313: 265: 495:
Hello Devalover, theres a discussion going on and because ive worked with you before on some articles I thought You might like to join in to at least offer your views.
116: 252:
Ok, Devalover, I understand why you might want to stay out of it. Im going to forward you the message with links in case you want to add evidence on your behalf.
172:
I want to say thank you for all of this, because I have reviewed the sock-puppet guidelines and decided to be open and honest about me, please see my user page.
112: 65: 49: 429:
I am very open and curious about your ideas of where the article could go... and as long as you have good citations for your ideas, let's do it.
308:
In the unlikely event you choose to comment in the current arbitration, I would suggest that comments from non-participants are welcome on the
169:
I bear you no ill-will and myself have definatley dealt with sock-puppets... I basically saw your actions as attempts to ascertain the truth.
25:
to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
69: 98: 242:
It is my belief that Edgarde is convinced I am not you that my participation on that page will only make a tense situation more tense.
34: 22: 68:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
439:
Unless of course you have good sources, which name the gang and make the links, in which case, let's just start there.
54: 472:. and would appreciate it if you may have a look at it and give some input and tidy up if you have time, thankyou. 29: 108: 86: 61: 363: 77: 44: 152:
You have at this time my provisional apologies for any trouble this brought you or your reputation. —
424:
Your English is wonderful, if you hadn't told me, I wouldn't have known you weren't a native speaker.
149:
The "wrong" answer will not incriminate you, but the right answer will help clear you a bit faster.
257:
Here is the message that I got, which also may apply to you, since you are involved in the dispute:
76:
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --
268:. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, 489: 483: 235: 496: 473: 460: 407: 349: 287: 469: 440: 386: 243: 217: 176: 358:
I just want to make sure you are aware of the remedies in this arbitration case. Per
39: 326: 203: 153: 133: 97: 340: 283:
I'm glad we can at least put the impersonation charges behind us at this point.
468:
Ive also just added an article to wikipedia on Children in Jail in Philippines.
456: 499: 476: 463: 443: 410: 389: 366: 352: 329: 290: 246: 220: 206: 179: 156: 136: 80: 321: 319:
And if you don't want to get involved, I'll certainly understand.
272:. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, 115:
for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with
274:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Sex tourism/Workshop
270:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Sex tourism/Evidence
165:) Thank you for your provisional appology! :) That's a first. 452: 360:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests_for_arbitration/Sex_tourism#Puppets
470:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Children_in_jail_in_Philippines
344: 302: 129:
My net was wide. Now my tuna has dolphin in it. Damn.
266:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Sex tourism
264:An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: 490:WP:ANI#User:RodentofDeath resumes personal attacks 113:Knowledge (XXG):Suspected sock puppets/Devalover 453:http://en.wikipedia.org/Death_squad#Philippines 8: 457:http://www.preda.org/archives/davao/dds.html 316:as doing so makes one into a "participant". 185:Wow. That's quite a user page. Much respect. 175:As for my Internet Service, I do have DSL. 60:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 70:Knowledge (XXG):Where to ask a question 312:. I wouldn't recommend adding to the 7: 375:Thanks for the heads up both of you. 301:I hope I didn't trigger the latest 72:, ask me on my talk page, or place 30:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG) 14: 320: 305:by commenting on the Talk page. 119:before editing the evidence page 96: 1: 330:23:44, 10 December 2006 (UTC) 247:00:59, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 221:08:28, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 207:02:03, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 180:00:57, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 157:20:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC) 137:23:39, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 92: 81:09:23, 19 December 2005 (UTC) 291:21:26, 8 December 2006 (UTC) 50:How to write a great article 390:05:20, 8 January 2007 (UTC) 367:05:30, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 353:20:15, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 515: 500:19:13, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 345:Arbitration Specifications 191:big mistake, I'll provide. 477:17:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC) 464:16:27, 22 June 2007 (UTC) 132:Very sorry about this. — 107:You have been accused of 482:Notice of discussion at 444:17:38, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 411:13:10, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 297:Well, thanks for trying 236:request for arbitration 229:Request for arbitration 288:Daniel E. Knodel, M.A. 21:Hello, Devalover, and 310:Arbitration Talk page 117:notes for the suspect 120: 111:. Please refer to 35:How to edit a page 106: 104: 103: 506: 324: 100: 93: 75: 514: 513: 509: 508: 507: 505: 504: 503: 487: 403: 337: 335:Sex Tourism Ban 299: 231: 91: 73: 55:Manual of Style 12: 11: 5: 512: 510: 486: 480: 459:. kind regards 449: 447: 446: 436: 435: 431: 430: 426: 425: 421: 420: 415: 402: 399: 397: 395: 394: 393: 392: 379: 378: 377: 376: 370: 369: 348: 336: 333: 298: 295: 294: 293: 285: 284: 280: 279: 278: 277: 259: 258: 254: 253: 241: 230: 227: 226: 225: 224: 223: 210: 209: 198: 197: 193: 192: 187: 186: 167: 166: 161: 140: 139: 130: 127: 102: 101: 90: 84: 66:sign your name 58: 57: 52: 47: 42: 37: 32: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 511: 502: 501: 498: 493: 491: 485: 481: 479: 478: 475: 471: 466: 465: 462: 458: 454: 445: 442: 438: 437: 433: 432: 428: 427: 423: 422: 418: 417: 416: 413: 412: 409: 401:Hey Devalover 400: 398: 391: 388: 383: 382: 381: 380: 374: 373: 372: 371: 368: 365: 361: 357: 356: 355: 354: 351: 346: 342: 334: 332: 331: 328: 323: 317: 315: 311: 306: 304: 296: 292: 289: 286: 282: 281: 275: 271: 267: 263: 262: 261: 260: 256: 255: 251: 250: 249: 248: 245: 239: 237: 228: 222: 219: 214: 213: 212: 211: 208: 205: 200: 199: 195: 194: 189: 188: 184: 183: 182: 181: 178: 173: 170: 164: 163: 162: 159: 158: 155: 150: 147: 143: 138: 135: 131: 128: 124: 123: 122: 118: 114: 110: 99: 95: 94: 88: 85: 83: 82: 79: 71: 67: 63: 56: 53: 51: 48: 46: 43: 41: 38: 36: 33: 31: 28: 27: 26: 24: 19: 18: 494: 488: 467: 448: 414: 404: 396: 338: 318: 314:Project page 307: 300: 240: 232: 174: 171: 168: 160: 151: 148: 144: 141: 109:sockpuppetry 105: 87:Sockpuppetry 78:Singkong2005 59: 20: 16: 15: 419:Heya Susan- 364:Thatcher131 341:Sex tourism 497:Susanbryce 474:Susanbryce 461:Susanbryce 408:Susanbryce 350:KyndFellow 303:reversions 126:otherwise. 74:{{helpme}} 62:Wikipedian 40:Help pages 441:Devalover 387:Devalover 244:Devalover 218:Devalover 177:Devalover 64:! Please 45:Tutorial 17:Welcome! 327:edgarde 204:edgarde 154:edgarde 134:edgarde 23:welcome 484:WP:ANI 385:intro. 451:here. 89:case 492:. 325:— 238:? 121:. 347:. 276:.

Index

welcome
The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Wikipedian
sign your name
Knowledge (XXG):Where to ask a question
Singkong2005
09:23, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry

sockpuppetry
Knowledge (XXG):Suspected sock puppets/Devalover
notes for the suspect
edgarde
23:39, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
edgarde
20:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Devalover
00:57, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
edgarde
02:03, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Devalover
08:28, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
request for arbitration
Devalover
00:59, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑