29:, but nothing happened because you did not reply back. Had you done so this could have been sorted 3 months ago. I would probably support recreating the article, but first you have to remove your
49:
18:
26:
68:
57:
17:
Hi
Dimkalinux, please retract your speculations with regards to the administrators motivations at
38:
30:
73:
22:
79:
42:
64:
71:
as well, which is currently marked for deletion. --
50:Knowledge:Deletion review/Log/2011 October 26
19:Knowledge:Deletion review/Log/2011 October 26
8:
67:article, you may want to contribute to the
63:Since you are one of the editors of the
7:
14:
48:Totally agree. i`m answered on
1:
80:11:11, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
43:18:51, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
69:Informer Technologies, Inc.
58:Informer Technologies, Inc.
25:responded to your concerns
95:
31:assumption of bad faith
56:Request to improve
86:
78:
76:
94:
93:
89:
88:
87:
85:
84:
83:
74:
72:
61:
27:on his talkpage
12:
11:
5:
92:
90:
60:
54:
46:
45:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
91:
82:
81:
77:
70:
66:
59:
55:
53:
51:
44:
40:
36:
32:
28:
24:
20:
16:
15:
62:
47:
34:
23:User:Jayjg
35:Yoenit
75:Dandv
65:punBB
39:talk
33:.
52:.
41:)
21:.
37:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.