146:
diet is purely anecdotal". I mean, the raw foodism page cites a few studies showing benefits for those on a raw vegan diet, so that claim is an outright falsehood, plus further studies further down the raw veganism page also show some health benefits for a raw vegan diet. Then the above link I gave with its multiple scientific data showing that cooked food is, usually,more harmful than raw food, also shows that the following claim("There is also no body of scientific evidence to support the claims that raw food is healthier than cooked food") is also dead wrong, to put it very mildly. I will add some more stuff re this, altering the statements to show the exact opposite, but will add numerous refs to counter the nonsense peddled by
Scientific American. But the point is that no source is above reproach; just because it comes from Scientific American or the New York Times etc. does not make it valid.
624:
573:
407:
601:
550:"Spokesperson", in the talkpage there is the result of a poll that obviously the editor in question decided to ignore, so there was no point for me to write there as well. Even someone that hat never seen Knowledge (XXG) in his life would think that if the article is called "spokesperson" maybe is not a good idea to remove the word "spokesperson" from the article. Right?
135:
which make mistakes or even publish false data etc. In the case of the relevant statements, the claim that cooking makes (by implication ALL) foods more digestible is easily disproven when one actually reads the literature on heat-created toxins in cooked foods plus studies showing that many foods, such as raw meats etc., are made LESS digestible after being cooked:-
369:, to call users who monitor the category the template places them into, to visit and answer a help request. You thus never use it when you are asking a specific other person a question on their talk page, as you did here. In any event. answering your question would be much easier if you gave some context, like pointing to the
631:
the course. Nothing wrong with your messages, you just got to them prior to the course officially registering with the USEP. Just wanted to give you this heads up that I'll be replacing previous welcome messages with the USEP message on various pages. If you have questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Best regards,
166:
I've actually asked to comment my edits on the talkpage of the article, so I'll copy this discussion there. I don't have an agenda and if you can bring reliable sources that support your POV, you are welcome to insert it alongside the results of the study/studies published on
Scientific America. As I
438:
article. To me, that phrase does not indicate a lack of objectivity. It only indicates that a brand has the highest sales volume in its category. That is an objective status – something is either the best-selling brand, or it isn't. That's not POV adjective like "best tasting". But at the moment I'm
630:
Hey there! Thanks for spending time welcoming new editors. I've noticed that you have placed generic welcome messages on the talk pages of editors that you recognize as students. The
Ambassador program actually presents students with specialized welcome messages that provide links to pages vital to
364:
For future reference, when you post to any registered user's talk page they get a conspicuous orange banner informing them anywhere they are on
Knowledge (XXG), the next time they visit, that they have new messages. The banner persists until the person visits their talk page. The helpme template is
121:
Welcome to my talk page! Please, if you are thinking to write me about one of my edits in an article you don't agree about, do please write you opinion on the article's talk page and just leave a short notice here. I normally explain the reasons of my edits in the edit summary (for small edits) but
145:
The only thing that is likely correct is the claim that cooking makes vegetables more digestible, but then it is irresponsible, indeed fraudulent, for
Scientific American to suggest that all foods are made more digestible. Then there is this claim:- "the evidence for health benefits of a raw vegan
134:
I have an objection to your reinserting some dodgy claims made by someone else in the raw veganism section which I deleted. First of all, the fact that the original statements came from a
Scientific American article does not validate the statement per se - after all, there are plenty of journals
373:
of the edits that were removed, or providing the name of the articles and what you added that was removed. Generally, I am wondering if you understand that
Knowledge (XXG) is a tertiary source, only properly covering information that the wider world has recognized and published content about in
549:
Because he is a "new user"? He is registered since 2008 and his almost only contribution to
Knowledge (XXG) has been remove "spokesperson" and "spokeswoman" from the spokesperson article and almost every of its other contributions has been deleted by other editors. The article is called
124:
As a matter of principle I don't do vandalism. So if you don't like any of my edits, please try to bear in mind that I try to do my best but, as any other person on this planet, I'm not perfect and I do mistakes.
830:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
374:
reliable sources, and that it is never properly the place to announce new and original things that are not yet already recognized out in the world. I suggest you carefully read one of our core content policies:
335:
I'm stuck! I have been trying to inform others via
Knowledge (XXG) of the research I have done for almost a decade. I have written a book and I am wondering why any comments I insert keep getting deleted?
494:
in which case both editors may be blocked. I do not see either of these editors engaging in meaningful discussion on any related talk page. As
Klegein has very few edits I would remind Dia^ to review
556:
I'm sorry, is really this way to deal with issues that make people decide to leave Knowledge (XXG). Just choose the easiest way out for admin. If it's sensible or even logic doesn't count. --
774:
770:
73:
784:
731:
678:
530:. The editor in question decided to ignore my suggestion and the following day replaced all "spokesperson" and "spokeswoman" with "spokesman" to
79:
204:
780:
727:
721:
674:
668:
855:
717:
664:
540:(Undid revision 456047502 by Klegein (talk) please, read the talk page and here Knowledge (XXG):Manual_of_Style#Gender-neutral_language)
762:
355:
38:
167:
wrote in the edit summary, you can't remove sourced information just because in your opinion is not correct. I'd advise you to read
24:
586:
538:
Seeing that a message on his talkpage didn't work and thinking that having to wad through the all MoS I asked him in the summary "
68:
851:
777:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
724:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
671:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
59:
310:
292:
296:
842:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
847:
233:
761:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
708:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
609:
92:
598:
Take a look at the template, no need to add your name anymore (done automatically), hopefully you like it better.
526:
When the editor changed first all "spokesperson" and "spokeswoman" in "spokesman" I advised him, on his talkpage
417:
395:
232:
Hello, The template you see when you edit my talk page is an edit notice. Create a sub-page of your talk page at
97:
623:
106:
216:
172:
522:. Now, please don't tell me that new user are not aware that define an African American "black" is an insult.
343:
257:
351:
843:
542:" with a nice simple active link, so he didn't have to bother to search for it. He chose ignore that too.
122:
sometime I'm not half as clear as I'd like to be. So sorry in advance if I created any misunderstanding.
49:
604:
600:
459:
444:
491:
347:
64:
391:
819:
810:
638:
251:
240:
208:
147:
839:
823:
479:
387:
151:
111:
557:
483:
180:
20:
800:
747:
694:
579:
572:
504:
306:
45:
835:
827:
495:
370:
455:
440:
108:
838:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
831:
406:
383:
375:
329:
140:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Raw_foodism#Potential_harmful_effects_of_cooked_foods_and_cooking
295:
has a list pf preformatted templates you can also use. To look at my edit notice, go to
632:
390:. Obviously, with a more tailored question, a more tailored answer could be provided.--
379:
791:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
738:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
685:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
796:
792:
743:
739:
690:
686:
499:
301:
709:
660:
656:
205:
Knowledge (XXG):External_links/Noticeboard#Link_to_wiki.creativecommons.org
176:
168:
826:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
435:
110:
454:
Thanks for the good explanation that you provided on my talk page. —
859:
804:
751:
698:
645:
565:
518:
Sorry, but that's is really incredible. The user decided to change
509:
463:
448:
434:
I notice that you removed several "best selling" adjectives in the
423:
399:
316:
222:
188:
155:
766:
713:
439:
not in the mood for getting into an edit war with you about it. —
112:
15:
622:
589:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
571:
405:
139:
532:
the point to break the link to the "simple English" article
765:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
712:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
659:, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page
539:
531:
527:
519:
487:
475:
818:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
757:Disambiguation link notification for September 29
704:Disambiguation link notification for September 19
486:appear to be involved in a content dispute. The
27:, where you can send them messages and comments.
546:And now you are warning me for edit warring???
8:
260:to identify the person editing your page.
256:Put a greeting here. This example uses a
578:Hello, Dia^. You have new messages at
528:to have a look to the manual of stile
254:|id = Welcome MalnadachBot!
7:
594:Welcome-to-Knowledge (XXG) Template
14:
844:review the candidates' statements
763:Leonardo da Vinci's personal life
44:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
651:Disambiguation link notification
599:
488:Revision history of Spokesperson
39:Click here to start a new topic.
520:"African American" with "black"
246:box on it. This is the format:
850:. For the Election committee,
820:Arbitration Committee election
811:ArbCom elections are now open!
805:10:49, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
752:12:34, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
498:. Posting on both talk pages.
285:Put your choice of images here
1:
860:13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
699:10:44, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
293:Category:Editnotice templates
270:CSS formatting for the header
36:Put new text under old text.
646:04:09, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
566:17:18, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
510:14:23, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
464:17:05, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
449:23:45, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
424:22:19, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
400:12:45, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
384:identifying reliable sources
297:User talk:Jerem43/Editnotice
846:and submit your choices on
418:fuhghettaboutit's talk page
317:14:00, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
280:CSS formatting for the text
223:18:50, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
189:10:25, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
156:08:44, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
875:
852:MediaWiki message delivery
234:User talk:Dia^/Editnotice
203:There is a discussion at
74:Be welcoming to newcomers
561:
430:"Best selling" in Diageo
184:
339:Thanks for your help...
627:
576:
412:Hello, Dia^. You have
410:
207:which involves you. —
69:avoid personal attacks
824:Arbitration Committee
626:
575:
409:
299:. Hope this helps. --
275:Put your message here
265:Put your heading here
793:opt-out instructions
740:opt-out instructions
687:opt-out instructions
376:no original research
828:arbitration process
775:fix with Dab solver
722:fix with Dab solver
669:fix with Dab solver
580:Jeepday's talk page
490:verges on being an
840:arbitration policy
783:• Join us at the
730:• Join us at the
677:• Join us at the
628:
587:remove this notice
577:
411:
367:ones own talk page
80:dispute resolution
41:
788:
735:
682:
614:
613:(2 November 2011)
508:
426:
365:for placement on
360:
346:comment added by
314:
119:
118:
60:Assume good faith
37:
866:
778:
771:check to confirm
725:
718:check to confirm
672:
665:check to confirm
644:
641:
635:
619:Welcome messages
612:
607:
606:Magister Scienta
603:
590:
502:
421:
359:
340:
334:
328:
315:
304:
289:
245:
239:
219:
213:
113:
16:
874:
873:
869:
868:
867:
865:
864:
863:
848:the voting page
814:
785:DPL WikiProject
759:
732:DPL WikiProject
706:
679:DPL WikiProject
653:
639:
637:
633:
621:
605:
596:
591:
584:
472:
432:
427:
392:Fuhghettaboutit
341:
332:
326:
324:
300:
283:|image =
278:|textstyle =
273:|text =
268:|headerstyle =
263:|header =
249:
243:
237:
230:
217:
209:
201:
131:
115:
114:
109:
86:
85:
55:
12:
11:
5:
872:
870:
817:
813:
808:
758:
755:
705:
702:
652:
649:
620:
617:
595:
592:
583:
570:
569:
568:
553:
552:
551:
547:
544:
543:
536:
535:
524:
523:
514:
471:
468:
467:
466:
431:
428:
404:
403:
402:
323:
320:
287:
282:
277:
272:
267:
262:
229:
226:
211:TransporterMan
200:
197:
196:
195:
194:
193:
192:
191:
173:WP:INDEPENDENT
159:
158:
137:
136:
130:
127:
123:
117:
116:
107:
105:
104:
101:
100:
88:
87:
84:
83:
76:
71:
62:
56:
54:
53:
42:
33:
32:
29:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
871:
862:
861:
857:
853:
849:
845:
841:
837:
833:
829:
825:
821:
812:
809:
807:
806:
802:
798:
794:
789:
786:
782:
776:
772:
768:
764:
756:
754:
753:
749:
745:
741:
736:
733:
729:
723:
719:
715:
711:
703:
701:
700:
696:
692:
688:
683:
680:
676:
670:
666:
662:
658:
650:
648:
647:
642:
636:
625:
618:
616:
615:
610:
608:
602:
593:
588:
581:
574:
567:
563:
559:
555:
554:
548:
545:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
516:
515:
512:
511:
506:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
481:
477:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
452:
451:
450:
446:
442:
437:
429:
425:
419:
415:
408:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
380:verifiability
377:
372:
368:
363:
362:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
337:
331:
321:
319:
318:
312:
308:
303:
298:
294:
290:
286:
281:
276:
271:
266:
261:
259:
258:WP:Magic word
253:
247:
242:
235:
227:
225:
224:
220:
214:
212:
206:
198:
190:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
165:
164:
163:
162:
161:
160:
157:
153:
149:
144:
143:
142:
141:
133:
132:
128:
126:
103:
102:
99:
96:
94:
90:
89:
81:
77:
75:
72:
70:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
51:
47:
46:Learn to edit
43:
40:
35:
34:
31:
30:
26:
22:
18:
17:
815:
790:
760:
737:
707:
684:
654:
629:
611:
597:
513:
480:User:Klegein
473:
470:Edit warring
433:
414:new messages
413:
366:
348:77.101.88.74
342:— Preceding
338:
325:
291:
284:
279:
274:
269:
264:
255:
248:
236:and place a
231:
210:
202:
138:
129:Raw Veganism
120:
91:
661:Bruce Weber
657:Silverpoint
492:WP:Edit War
456:BarrelProof
441:BarrelProof
378:. See also
228:Edit notice
836:topic bans
795:. Thanks,
742:. Thanks,
689:. Thanks,
252:Editnotice
241:Editnotice
199:ELN notice
832:site bans
779:Read the
726:Read the
710:MukoyĹŤshi
673:Read the
484:User:Dia^
388:WP:FRINGE
311:I did it!
307:blah blah
82:if needed
65:Be polite
25:talk page
585:You can
356:contribs
344:unsigned
148:Loki0115
93:Archives
50:get help
19:This is
797:DPL bot
744:DPL bot
691:DPL bot
655:Hi. In
643:(Cindy)
500:Jeepday
496:WP:BITE
822:. The
436:Diageo
330:helpme
322:helpme
302:Jeremy
175:, and
767:Salai
714:Canon
640:amuse
634:Cind.
478:User
371:diffs
78:Seek
856:talk
801:talk
748:talk
695:talk
562:talk
558:Dia^
505:talk
482:and
476:edit
474:See
460:talk
445:talk
396:talk
386:and
352:talk
218:TALK
185:talk
181:Dia^
177:here
169:here
152:talk
67:and
21:Dia^
816:Hi,
781:FAQ
728:FAQ
675:FAQ
416:at
179:.--
23:'s
858:)
834:,
803:)
773:|
750:)
720:|
697:)
667:|
564:)
534:.
462:)
447:)
422:--
420:.
398:)
382:,
358:)
354:•
333:}}
327:{{
309:•
288:}}
250:{{
244:}}
238:{{
221:)
187:)
171:,
154:)
48:;
854:(
799:(
787:.
769:(
746:(
734:.
716:(
693:(
681:.
663:(
582:.
560:(
507:)
503:(
458:(
443:(
394:(
350:(
313:)
305:(
215:(
183:(
150:(
98:1
95::
52:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.