1191:
Catholic Church, and they are all originally sourced. These are certainly not the views of tiny minorities, nor are they exclusively my own views. Yes, they are also my views, but more importantly they are the Church's views and I provide ample support for that. Rather than recopy the original Church statements with original sources into the
Knowledge (XXG) article, which I think would be redundant and perhaps take the article a bit off track, I am suggesting something small, like a sentence or two about the Church's view (or any opposition view for that matter) or a link to CCC which presents the Church' statements. There is a statement at CCC, referenced, by the current pope, who is highly critical of this movement, although he does not mention EC by name. The Church talks about ideas, ethics, principles, etc., and rarely actually attacks a specific document, organization, etc. But it is clear if one considers thoughtfully the body of the Church's statements about "global super-states" and "new global ethics" that they are referring to the Earth Charter and related efforts to create a new global governance. The founders of the Earth Charter initiative themselves compare the Earth Charter to a "constitution" or "declaration." Example, quote by Gorbachev: "We can use experience of the founding fathers of the United States' Constitution" (speech at the Rio+5 Forum, March 18, 1997)). Founders, such as Maurice Strong, were members of the Commission on "Global Governance." I have a quote at CCC with Gorbachev using the term "world government." A Google search reveals more examples of the use of these terms. My point is that such seemingly "loaded" terms are not my own terms, rather they are terms used by the Earth Charter Initiative or the Church. The Church's view is rather significant here, particularly based on the claims of Earth Charter supporters that the Church somehow supports this movement. At the very least, Pope John Paul II should not appear to be supporting the EC in this article. That's just outright fraud. The quote in the article is not even by the pope, it is by an archbishop, who is simply following Church protocol to welcome a head of state or former head of state to Italy. It is not a statement one way or another about the Earth Charter. Thank you for your consideration.Jake5577 (talk) 14:10, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
234:
be a problem. Also, since when is one template clutter? Obviously, two more were coming, but most other models started adding 1990s and 1980s before I even got them cleaned up (1980s are still to incomplete to add). My objective is to have
Victoria Secret fashion show, Vogue magazine and Sports Illustrated swimsuit templates. Cindy supporters could surely create a list of cover appearance, but that would not link her to other models. The purpose of a navbox is to link related topics. You can see on my user page subpage for pages started in the template section where this is going. Basically, Crawford will have four templates. I am fairly certain, if Glamour, Elle, etc. templates get created they will all be deleted, but if people support just having the premier cover then it will probably survive. The 1990s template is quite informative if added to Cindy's page. The 1980s probably will be as well. You seem to be the only person removing them as other editors of her peers are adding them before I even get to their pages.--
1481:
1837:
1739:
1662:
1968:
125:
that obvious would cover that statment. I am certainly not arguing whether these statements are true or false -- I suspect that they are all true, and that most of them could be supported from among the works already used as references -- but simply that each of them should have a specific citation to support it. Is there a specific fact tag that you were wondering about?
1301:
512:(Insects?) Hi. You left me (Diderot's dreams) a message about the Insect article, a GA review, and reference formatting. I'm not the nominator of this article or involved in any way. I did some fixing/organizing of the GA templates a few days ago after seeing a problem on the talk page, maybe that's why you thought it was me.
145:
them. My hope was that someone working on the article who had more subject-matter knowledge would quickly be able to supply citations, something that obviously hasn't happened. I can certainly appreciate the concern, and if you think that any of those points don't really need citations, you're welcome to remove the tags.
977:
1085:
1190:
Thanks
Diderot's dreams. I have looked at the guidelines as you suggested. One point I would like to make refers to "Undue" weight. There it says, "the views of tiny minorities should not be included at all." Despite what has been alleged, the CCC website features statements by officials of the Roman
930:
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other
Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work.
29:
Hi! I would like to stress my concern with a contributor of the Earth
Charter page, who has included misleading information. As a person involved in the Earth Charter Initiative I know that he's putting biased and his opinion as if it were facts. His name is Cybercobra, how can we avoid him to undo
1357:
That notwithstanding, I don't see the point in reverting either, as it's not as if noon or midnight are less understandable than the ambiguous 12AM/12PM counterparts. Actually, this has inspired me to put "check out any noon/midnight wiki articles" on my mental to-do list, and enhance as warranted.
1273:
I should have been more precise in my label. As the sentence is currently written, it is violating NPOV. "Low ridership in the first year exceeded lower expectations" is simply a value judgment. Low compared to what? The only barometer mentioned is the expectations, and it exceeded those. Worse yet,
1127:
Hello again, and thanks for taking the time on both occasions to have a look at the progress made. Noticed that your comment on the summary has not been strikethrough'd, so I have rewritten it to more directly reflect the content and flow of the article itself. Some guidance at your discretion would
233:
When I saw that
Crawford, Turlington, and Evangelista were bereft of interlinking templates, I started looking for ways to get her linked. If any other Fashion mag templates get created, we will probably lose all of them through TfD. But if we keep it to the premier one, I don't think clutter will
1497:
So for those who haven't heard about the
Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught
1010:
for their kind nomination and support. I am truly honored by the trust and confidence that the community has placed in me. I thank you for your kind inputs and I will be sincerely looking at the reasons that people opposed me so I can improve in those areas ( including my english ;) ). If you ever
700:
Wow! Thank you so much for all your work, and for all of your sympathetic help with this. This is the
Gastropods Project's very first Good Article, and my first experience of the outside reviewing process (not counting the DYKs we have done.) I am delighted to get our first Good Article, out of the
491:
I think the original reviewer is off their mark concerning cite web being necessary for GA. I just rechecked the wikipedia GA standards, and that's FA criteria, not GA. Either way, all your references need to be cited in a similar manner, and right now you've cited inline references in at least 3
124:
That was a while ago, so it's hard to say, but looking at the fact tags in the current revision of that article, I'd still argue that they all need citations. None of them strike me as so obvious that they should be taken without a source, and in none of the current cases is there a nearby footnote
1046:
is interesting. It is bordering on notable now, although if you had the misfortune to return it to mainspace on a bad day with some overzealous deletion-minded, I fear it could still end up binned. Some information on the singles at the bottom would be highly desirable - did they chart, where were
1521:
is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your
1214:
Hi
Diderot's dreams! We could use your help with the Earth Charter article. Someone named Vladimir Frolov drastically altered the article, and now it reads like a promo for the EC. I'm opposed to the EC as you'll see, but what I would really would like to see is a balanced article, rather than
144:
from becoming worse of an uncited POV mess) and, though I'm an alum, I'm not really much of a
Michigan State fan. I lived in the area and had taken some photos of Michigan Stadium, and in uploading the photos, I noticed uncited statements that were - as you put it - pretty incredible, and tagged
1539:
If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your
356:
1353:
To me at least their statements make total sense, and the notion that there is a convention (at least an unambiguous one) one way or the other is flawed, and I wish the entire broadcast industry would likewise update their promotional materials, schedules, etc. The hours I corrected were by
1277:
I have no problem with the claim you are wanting to make, that ridership was low. However, this claim cannot be made without stating what it is low in comparison to. You could say something like, "While ridership in the first year exceeded modest expectations, it was low in comparison to
330:
Thanks very much for all your help reviewing this article. One more question, though. Do you have any recommendations on what could or should be done with it if it were to be prepared for an FA review? I'm not planing on doing this anytime soon but would still appreciate any feedback.
1509:. Now, one of the most important criteria is that you have at least 15 independent reviews. If you are reading this, you are likely 3 (or less) reviews short, so if you review another couple nominations, you can become a recruiter! If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read
436:
page, and I found a bit more to add. It is tricky as it has not been as well studied as other birds I have worked up, so coverage is sparse in some areas. In any case I have tried to address all concerns - let me know if you want me to fine tune some more, it's okay to be thorough.
1215:
having it biased to one side or another, as Vladimir recently changed it. The article was great a couple of weeks ago, with all viewpoints fairly covered. Even though I don't like the EC, at least before it was a relatively fair article with integrity. But now its been trashed.
1486:
Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed between 12-14 Good article nominations and
1111:
Hello, have been fleshing out the abovementioned article a bit and including other secondary sources that I thought would be useful to the article. Would you be able to take a second look, and if you have the time, guide me through the process of making it a GA? Thanks!
93:
is on those who want the statement in the article. The standard can't be otherwise, it makes too much work to get rid of dubious content. The encyclopedia would be overwhelmed with junk. So if you think the statements I removed are true, find a source and
1674:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
496:
article, also currently under GA review, which related to insects/arthropods. At the very least, I'd suggest using that style of referencing, which is similar in style to that which already exists in some of the insect article's references.
373:
369:
1514:
1541:
1518:
1510:
1506:
1529:
If you are interested in becoming a recruiter but do not meet the 15 review requirement, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters and put your status as "Not Available" until you have reviewed enough nominations.
1544:. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article.
1452:
1444:
1702:
1556:
A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit
1617:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
646:
Thanks for the heads-up. Looking over the nomination, I agree with the rationales listed so far. Hopefully somebody works to address the raised issues to help the article retain its status. --Happy editing!
1686:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
315:
this did not happen; all the categories other than the Arts banner at the top of the talk page are still listed as B-class. Is there something else I should do or was this an oversight? Thanks.
1341:
I noticed your edit about noon and midnight. I just wanted to note that actually 12 midnight is considered 12 AM, and twelve noon is 12 PM by convention. You might want to undo your change.
1457:
1235:
May I add that the man who drastically altered the Earth Charter article, Vladimir Frolov, works for the Earth Charter Initiative in Moscow? Just google his name with "Earth Charter."
410:
1313:
99:
Until then, someone else doubted them (put the fact tag), and no one backed them up with a reference for some time. The statements have failed verifiability, and should be removed.
492:
different ways. Bare references (only hyperlinks with no explanation as to who the article, publisher, etcetera are) are supposed to be avoided. I added a couple lines from the
383:
1073:
686:
And thanks very much for your careful review. We appreciate your putting time and attention into this. We are already working on implementing your suggestions! Many thanks,
171:
at the end of the article but do not know whether this was what you had in mind by mentioning Tchaikovsky's impact. Could you please look it over and let me know? Thanks.
1945:
821:
1505:
The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet
1274:
it is bad English. To use the same comparative word against itself makes no sense. It only comes off as snarky and diminishes the encyclopedic quality of the article.
1498:
how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers:
983:
1346:
110:
1517:. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the
519:
462:
it is one year but this is not actually specified - and I have also added that it has been little studied, as the source mentions that several times.
79:
1898:
1800:
1434:, but on the GA template I don't know what to put in the oldid parameter of the GA template on the talk page. Could you help me out here? Cheers.
1944:
has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
547:
1492:
1128:
be appreciated to better improve it. In addition, I've dropped/replaced all ReactOS Wiki citations as per your point. Thanks for the input! --
89:
In casual reading, I only do research if I think the fact-tagged statement is true. In this case I have no idea, true or false. The onus of
1304:
Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed,
594:
I can restore and place it in your userspace if you can source it so it meets notability criteria, before possibly moving back to mainspace.
1716:
1642:
1552:. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along.
1043:
1037:
615:
19:
1456:
which is expected to close in a little over a week. If you have received this message, it is because it appears that you participated in
766:
1361:
The other thing I wanted to do (but didn't) is make it all uniform, with only (say) "AM" and "PM," and not "am," "a.m.," "A.M.," etc.
244:
210:
1804:
656:
1902:
1077:
248:
214:
1712:
1638:
910:
892:
1695:
167:
Thanks for your comments on the GA review of this article. One question: I've added some comments by Dr. David Brown from the
1257:
1146:
Thanks for getting back to me and the well-wishes. I didn't renominate the article btw, someone else did, but no matter =) --
1058:
629:
605:
476:
448:
395:
46:
1890:
1848:
1826:
1792:
1750:
1728:
1309:
551:
75:
1894:
1796:
1397:
866:
1629:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
1324:. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you.
411:
Knowledge (XXG):Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009 April 23#Category:Knowledge (XXG) users who oppose Flagged Revisions
1707:
1634:
409:
The category associated with the no flagged revisions userbox you have placed on your user page is up for deletion at
533:
554:. If you happen to have any of the associated pages in your watchlist, it is unnecessary to continue watching them.
1948:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
1480:
884:
307:
Hope this doesn't seem ungrateful for all your assistance on the Tchaikovsky article, but here's my question. When
194:
1316:. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.
1877:
950:
312:
161:
69:
1683:
311:
became a good article not long ago, the rating in all the areas in which it was listed also changed to GA. On
140:
I don't really tend to do more than an occassional edit on sports-related articles (except for trying to keep
1354:
inference of the context (meaning for example I doubted that some program would last from 9 AM to midnight).
559:
308:
1245:
34:
1953:
1844:
1830:
1327:
513:
240:
206:
102:
1975:
Here is a picture of an armadillo, in case you wanted to look at one. If you don't just skip it. Thanks!
1906:
1808:
1630:
701:
over 5,000 we have in the Project. Hopefully there will be many more to follow. Very best wishes to you,
1980:
1465:
1019:
816:
652:
292:
277:
1779:
1495:(the initial messages I sent out went to only WikiProject members and users that had over 15 reviews).
1321:
575:
There was no deletion discussion. As noted in the deletion log, it was deleted in accordance with the
62:
You should try to do research before removing fact-tagged statements. The information you removed from
1540:
nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of
1924:
1583:
1011:
need anything please feel free to ask me and I would be happy to help you :). Have a great day ! --
958:
939:
879:
826:
761:
529:
502:
1670:
1652:
1606:
1597:
252:
218:
1816:
1401:
1249:
1222:
1200:
1192:
1151:
1133:
1117:
706:
691:
677:
569:
355:
38:
1746:
1732:
1679:
1626:
1610:
1279:
1081:
1368:
1253:
1226:
1204:
1196:
1052:
920:
786:
623:
599:
555:
470:
442:
418:
391:
336:
320:
190:
Is there a reason why you removed the 2000s Vogue covers for Cindy Crawford. I was going to add
176:
42:
736:
1949:
1914:
1873:
1775:
1283:
796:
584:
235:
201:
150:
130:
1691:
1622:
1614:
576:
256:
222:
1976:
1568:
1549:
1522:
name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available".
1461:
1414:
1405:
1383:
1168:
1161:
1097:
1012:
1007:
999:
874:
848:
751:
648:
493:
433:
288:
273:
141:
117:
1860:
1762:
1694:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1687:
1625:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1618:
1920:
1579:
954:
902:
791:
756:
720:
525:
498:
1812:
1389:
1147:
1129:
1113:
943:
702:
687:
673:
1859:
While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be
1761:
While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be
458:
Ok, added a couple of more bits, but breeding age of female is nowhere to be found (I
90:
1431:
1424:
1364:
1048:
915:
838:
619:
595:
466:
438:
414:
387:
332:
316:
172:
1460:, and your contributions indicate that you are currently active on Knowledge (XXG).
1984:
1967:
1957:
1928:
1820:
1720:
1646:
1587:
1438:
1418:
1372:
1330:
1287:
1261:
1230:
1208:
1175:
1155:
1137:
1121:
1101:
1062:
1027:
962:
811:
746:
710:
695:
681:
660:
633:
609:
588:
580:
562:
506:
480:
452:
422:
399:
340:
324:
296:
281:
261:
227:
180:
154:
146:
134:
126:
83:
50:
1661:
806:
1560:
1410:
1093:
843:
801:
771:
372:, in which you reviewed 5 articles, you are granted this barnstar! Great work! —
63:
1435:
1305:
1293:
1003:
861:
781:
1941:
1935:
666:
1757:
Corporate spam. No sources of any kind. Unresolved tag for last six months.
1312:. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at
614:
I have userfied and no-wikied teh cats so it should't come up. here --: -->
1785:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing
1453:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/2010 ArbCom election voting procedure
1445:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/2010 ArbCom election voting procedure
1913:
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the
1698:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1396:. The only source of information is an open wiki, which I believe to be
1392:
recommended I contact you regarding the inclusion of future versions of
1300:
723:
predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
1613:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
1393:
1345:
Actually, no, quite to the contrary; I meant every keystroke. I trust
1164:
931:
Your contributions make Knowledge (XXG) better -- thanks for helping.
897:
741:
1350:
976:
1084:
for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the
776:
949:
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on
1966:
856:
374:
The participants on the Spring 2009 GAN backlog elimination drive
579:
for the reasons listed in the deletion log. Hope this helps. -
1701:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
1068:
Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop
524:
Ah, ok. I look deeper into it. Just trying to be helpful.
1835:
1737:
1479:
1349:
as an authoritative source, and I'd ask that you please see
386:
to indicate your participation on your user page. Thanks! –
1314:
Knowledge (XXG):General sanctions/Climate change probation
1088:. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.
413:
and you are invited to share your opinions on the issue.
1160:
Hello, Diderot's dreams, I'm Airplaneman. I'm currently
1901:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
1883:
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing
1803:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
1682:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
953:. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. --
66:
16:
Please post any comments for me on this page. Thanks!
1866:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
1768:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
672:
Thanks for volunteering to review this article. Best,
384:
User:Drilnoth/Userboxes/GAN backlog elimination drive
1548:
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to
938:
on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on
287:And thank you for the review, though unsuccessful.
1605:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
822:List of University of California, Berkeley alumni
716:Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
382:In addition, you may use the userbox located at
1384:User talk:Gyrobo § Future revisions of ReactOS
405:No flagged revisions category up for deletion
8:
1472:WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre
169:New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians
971:
1404:but not resolved. Please discuss this on
1047:they released, did they get airplay etc.
911:Children of the Prime Ministers of Canada
370:Spring 2009 GAN backlog elimination drive
272:Thank you, in advance, for the review =]
1221:Bill Jacobs Catholic Conservation Center
550:, I have withdrawn the GA nomination of
1872:notice, but please explain why in your
1774:notice, but please explain why in your
1668:Hello, Diderot's dreams. Voting in the
986:, which passed nearly unanimously with
542:GA nom of 1973 Pacific hurricane season
350:
1450:You are invited to participate in the
432:it was a while since I buffed up the
7:
1917:of each individual file for details.
1671:2016 Arbitration Committee elections
1684:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
1351:http://tf.nist.gov/general/misc.htm
1044:User:Diderot's dreams/Nisha Kataria
767:List of environmental organizations
616:User:Diderot's_dreams/Nisha_Kataria
1861:deleted for any of several reasons
1851:because of the following concern:
1763:deleted for any of several reasons
1753:because of the following concern:
1167:. Your input is welcome. Regards,
1072:As you participated in the recent
14:
1886:{{proposed deletion/dated files}}
1869:{{proposed deletion/dated files}}
1631:review the candidates' statements
725:
362:The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
1660:
1475:
1299:
1086:SecurePoll feedback and workshop
975:
354:
1855:unused, low-res, no obvious use
1578:This message was sent out by --
1400:This point was brought up in a
1199:) 14:12, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
1091:For the Arbitration Committee,
982:Thank you for participating in
893:Certified Management Accountant
428:Ok I think I got everything....
1934:Good article reassessment for
1637:. For the Election committee,
1607:Arbitration Committee election
1598:ArbCom elections are now open!
368:For your participation in the
303:Question on Tchaikovsky rating
1:
1958:15:34, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
1721:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
1647:13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
1536:Nominators, please read this:
1288:08:55, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
1262:08:43, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
1231:08:14, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
1209:14:42, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
1156:16:51, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
1138:10:41, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
1122:13:09, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
1102:08:07, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
1063:03:34, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
968:Did I forget to thank you? ..
552:1973 Pacific hurricane season
546:For reasons specified on the
155:20:17, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
135:17:14, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
111:21:09, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
84:19:17, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
58:Removing unsourced statements
51:17:54, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
1439:01:37, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
1028:04:29, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
981:
867:Application binary interface
1929:01:01, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
1905:allows discussion to reach
1807:allows discussion to reach
1788:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
1771:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
1705:and submit your choices on
1633:and submit your choices on
1176:06:09, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
1076:election, or in one of two
951:the SuggestBot request page
711:13:56, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
376:21:19, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
186:Cindy Crawford Vogue Covers
2000:
1897:exist. In particular, the
1821:22:57, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
1799:exist. In particular, the
1713:MediaWiki message delivery
1703:the candidates' statements
1639:MediaWiki message delivery
1381:
1080:that relate to the use of
974:
963:19:44, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
946:, SuggestBot's caretaker.
885:Illyricum (Roman province)
728:
696:13:12, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
682:18:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
481:11:28, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
453:14:17, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
423:04:51, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
400:21:19, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
341:19:58, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
325:13:00, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
297:05:51, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
282:00:37, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
262:21:20, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
228:20:08, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
1985:15:07, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
1891:proposed deletion process
1793:proposed deletion process
1588:21:04, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
1513:and add your name to the
1493:WikiProject Good articles
1373:22:30, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
1331:21:54, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
998:. Special thanks goes to
832:
661:19:59, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
353:
181:20:59, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
1468:) 26 October 2010 (UTC)
1398:acceptable in this case.
1107:GA Re-review of ReactOS?
634:02:24, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
610:14:28, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
589:14:04, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
577:proposed deletion policy
313:Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky
268:Osteitis fibrosa cystica
162:Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky
106:
68:is most likely correct.
1780:the article's talk page
1419:16:56, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
1378:Future ReactOS versions
563:03:32, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
534:21:56, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
520:21:55, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
507:21:37, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
309:Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov
1972:
1857:
1840:
1759:
1742:
1484:
1430:Hey Diderot. I passed
1343:
940:SuggestBot's talk page
1970:
1853:
1849:proposed for deletion
1839:
1805:articles for deletion
1755:
1751:proposed for deletion
1741:
1680:Arbitration Committee
1653:ArbCom Elections 2016
1611:Arbitration Committee
1483:
1339:
817:Springer on the Radio
1903:files for discussion
1878:the file's talk page
1845:File:Clock sweep.gif
1831:File:Clock sweep.gif
1078:requests for comment
880:Juho Kusti Paasikivi
827:Air America Mornings
762:Elections in Ukraine
195:1990-1999VogueCovers
1615:arbitration process
1402:previous discussion
1973:
1895:deletion processes
1841:
1797:deletion processes
1743:
1696:arbitration policy
1655:: Voting now open!
1627:arbitration policy
1515:list of recruiters
1485:
1074:Audit Subcommittee
921:Hanyang University
1946:reassessment page
1827:Proposed deletion
1729:Proposed deletion
1594:
1593:
1590:
1322:templated message
1310:article probation
1265:
1248:comment added by
1033:
1032:
928:
927:
797:Katherine Lanpher
787:Claudine's Return
380:
379:
260:
226:
54:
37:comment added by
1991:
1918:
1888:
1887:
1871:
1870:
1838:
1790:
1789:
1773:
1772:
1740:
1664:
1577:
1573:
1565:
1476:
1303:
1264:
1242:
1171:
979:
972:
875:Count Theodosius
849:Stuff (magazine)
752:Yahoo! Directory
726:
560:Talk to Madeline
518:
514:Diderot's dreams
494:prevailing winds
434:Red-capped Robin
358:
351:
238:
204:
199:
193:
142:Dynasty (sports)
118:Michigan Stadium
103:Diderot's dreams
72:
53:
31:
1999:
1998:
1994:
1993:
1992:
1990:
1989:
1988:
1965:
1939:
1912:
1899:speedy deletion
1885:
1884:
1868:
1867:
1836:
1834:
1801:speedy deletion
1787:
1786:
1770:
1769:
1738:
1736:
1725:
1724:
1708:the voting page
1665:
1657:
1635:the voting page
1601:
1569:
1561:
1519:process section
1474:
1458:the 2009 AC RfC
1448:
1428:
1386:
1380:
1338:
1336:12 AM and 12 PM
1320:The above is a
1297:
1271:
1243:
1188:
1169:
1109:
1070:
1041:
996:1 neutral votes
992:2 in opposition
970:
942:. Thanks from
903:Sanctions (law)
792:Florence Martus
757:Betsy Rosenberg
718:
670:
644:
573:
544:
516:
489:
430:
407:
349:
305:
270:
197:
191:
188:
165:
122:
70:
60:
32:
27:
12:
11:
5:
1997:
1995:
1964:
1961:
1938:
1932:
1909:for deletion.
1889:will stop the
1833:
1824:
1811:for deletion.
1791:will stop the
1735:
1726:
1666:
1659:
1658:
1656:
1650:
1604:
1600:
1595:
1592:
1591:
1546:
1545:
1524:
1523:
1473:
1470:
1447:
1442:
1427:
1422:
1408:
1379:
1376:
1337:
1334:
1318:
1317:
1296:
1291:
1270:
1267:
1238:Thanks again!
1213:
1187:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1141:
1140:
1108:
1105:
1092:
1090:
1089:
1069:
1066:
1040:
1036:notability of
1034:
1031:
1030:
1023:
1016:
988:174 in support
980:
969:
966:
926:
925:
924:
923:
918:
913:
908:
905:
900:
895:
890:
887:
882:
877:
872:
869:
864:
859:
854:
851:
846:
841:
836:
831:
830:
829:
824:
819:
814:
809:
804:
799:
794:
789:
784:
779:
774:
769:
764:
759:
754:
749:
744:
739:
734:
732:
717:
714:
669:
664:
643:
640:
639:
638:
637:
636:
572:
566:
543:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
488:
485:
484:
483:
429:
426:
406:
403:
378:
377:
365:
364:
359:
348:
345:
344:
343:
304:
301:
300:
299:
269:
266:
265:
264:
187:
184:
164:
159:
158:
157:
121:
115:
114:
113:
100:
96:
95:
59:
56:
26:
23:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1996:
1987:
1986:
1982:
1978:
1969:
1962:
1960:
1959:
1955:
1951:
1947:
1943:
1937:
1933:
1931:
1930:
1926:
1922:
1916:
1910:
1908:
1904:
1900:
1896:
1892:
1881:
1879:
1875:
1864:
1862:
1856:
1852:
1850:
1846:
1832:
1828:
1825:
1823:
1822:
1818:
1814:
1810:
1806:
1802:
1798:
1794:
1783:
1781:
1777:
1766:
1764:
1758:
1754:
1752:
1748:
1734:
1730:
1727:
1723:
1722:
1718:
1714:
1710:
1709:
1704:
1699:
1697:
1693:
1689:
1685:
1681:
1676:
1673:
1672:
1663:
1654:
1651:
1649:
1648:
1644:
1640:
1636:
1632:
1628:
1624:
1620:
1616:
1612:
1608:
1599:
1596:
1589:
1585:
1581:
1576:
1575:
1572:
1566:
1564:
1558:
1553:
1551:
1543:
1538:
1537:
1533:
1532:
1531:
1528:
1520:
1516:
1512:
1508:
1507:this criteria
1504:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1494:
1490:
1482:
1478:
1477:
1471:
1469:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1454:
1446:
1443:
1441:
1440:
1437:
1433:
1432:Florida mouse
1426:
1425:Florida mouse
1423:
1421:
1420:
1416:
1412:
1407:
1406:my talk page.
1403:
1399:
1395:
1391:
1385:
1377:
1375:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1362:
1359:
1355:
1352:
1348:
1342:
1335:
1333:
1332:
1329:
1325:
1323:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1302:
1295:
1292:
1290:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1275:
1269:RE: SLUS edit
1268:
1266:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1251:
1247:
1239:
1236:
1233:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1219:
1218:Thanks much!
1216:
1211:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1186:Earth Charter
1185:
1177:
1174:
1172:
1166:
1163:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1106:
1104:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1067:
1065:
1064:
1060:
1057:
1054:
1050:
1045:
1039:
1038:Nisha Kataria
1035:
1029:
1025:
1024:
1021:
1018:
1017:
1014:
1009:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
989:
985:
978:
973:
967:
965:
964:
960:
956:
952:
947:
945:
941:
937:
932:
922:
919:
917:
916:Ubaldo Fillol
914:
912:
909:
906:
904:
901:
899:
896:
894:
891:
888:
886:
883:
881:
878:
876:
873:
870:
868:
865:
863:
860:
858:
855:
852:
850:
847:
845:
842:
840:
839:Pick and roll
837:
834:
833:
828:
825:
823:
820:
818:
815:
813:
810:
808:
805:
803:
800:
798:
795:
793:
790:
788:
785:
783:
780:
778:
775:
773:
770:
768:
765:
763:
760:
758:
755:
753:
750:
748:
745:
743:
740:
738:
735:
733:
730:
729:
727:
724:
722:
715:
713:
712:
708:
704:
698:
697:
693:
689:
684:
683:
679:
675:
668:
665:
663:
662:
658:
654:
650:
641:
635:
631:
628:
625:
621:
618:. Good luck.
617:
613:
612:
611:
607:
604:
601:
597:
593:
592:
591:
590:
586:
582:
578:
571:
570:Nisha Kataria
567:
565:
564:
561:
557:
556:Miss Madeline
553:
549:
541:
535:
531:
527:
523:
522:
521:
515:
511:
510:
509:
508:
504:
500:
495:
486:
482:
478:
475:
472:
468:
465:
461:
457:
456:
455:
454:
450:
447:
444:
440:
435:
427:
425:
424:
420:
416:
412:
404:
402:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
375:
371:
367:
366:
363:
360:
357:
352:
346:
342:
338:
334:
329:
328:
327:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
285:
284:
283:
279:
275:
267:
263:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
237:
232:
231:
230:
229:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
203:
196:
185:
183:
182:
178:
174:
170:
163:
160:
156:
152:
148:
143:
139:
138:
137:
136:
132:
128:
119:
116:
112:
108:
104:
101:
98:
97:
92:
91:verifiability
88:
87:
86:
85:
81:
77:
73:
67:
65:
57:
55:
52:
48:
44:
40:
36:
24:
22:
21:
17:
1974:
1971:An armadillo
1950:Onegreatjoke
1940:
1915:page history
1911:
1893:, but other
1882:
1874:edit summary
1865:
1858:
1854:
1842:
1795:, but other
1784:
1776:edit summary
1767:
1760:
1756:
1747:TrueBlue Inc
1745:The article
1744:
1733:TrueBlue Inc
1706:
1700:
1677:
1669:
1667:
1602:
1570:
1562:
1555:
1554:
1547:
1535:
1534:
1526:
1525:
1502:
1496:
1488:
1451:
1449:
1429:
1387:
1363:
1360:
1356:
1344:
1340:
1319:
1298:
1276:
1272:
1240:
1237:
1234:
1220:
1217:
1212:
1189:
1173:
1110:
1071:
1055:
1042:
1020:
1013:
995:
991:
987:
948:
935:
934:If you have
933:
929:
812:David Bender
747:Scott Holmes
719:
699:
685:
671:
645:
626:
602:
574:
545:
490:
473:
463:
459:
445:
431:
408:
381:
361:
306:
271:
236:TonyTheTiger
202:TonyTheTiger
189:
168:
166:
123:
61:
28:
18:
15:
1977:Herostratus
1511:the process
1503:Recruiters:
1462:Ncmvocalist
1382:Main page:
1244:—Preceding
1170:Airplaneman
1008:John Carter
1000:RegentsPark
871:Add Sources
844:World peace
802:Angie Coiro
772:On The Real
649:Nehrams2020
548:review page
289:Strombollii
274:Strombollii
64:agriculture
33:—Preceding
1921:FastilyBot
1692:topic bans
1623:topic bans
1580:EdwardsBot
1557:confusing.
1550:contact me
1306:Carbon tax
1294:Carbon tax
1082:SecurePoll
955:SuggestBot
862:Shot clock
807:Gardetto's
782:Kyle Jason
721:SuggestBot
526:Thegreatdr
499:Thegreatdr
253:WP:CHICAGO
219:WP:CHICAGO
30:my work?
1963:Armadillo
1942:Love dart
1936:Love dart
1907:consensus
1847:has been
1843:The file
1813:Chetsford
1809:consensus
1749:has been
1688:site bans
1619:site bans
1542:this page
1390:LoneRifle
1162:reviewing
1148:LoneRifle
1130:LoneRifle
1114:LoneRifle
944:ForteTuba
737:Dan Huard
703:Invertzoo
688:Invertzoo
674:Invertzoo
667:Love dart
347:Barnstar!
120:fact tags
25:Comments:
20:Archive 1
1919:Thanks,
1491:part of
1308:, is on
1258:contribs
1250:Jake5577
1246:unsigned
1223:Jake5577
1201:Jake5577
1193:Jake5577
1059:contribs
1049:Casliber
1022:Cherian
936:feedback
630:contribs
620:Casliber
606:contribs
596:Casliber
477:contribs
467:Casliber
449:contribs
439:Casliber
415:Alansohn
388:Drilnoth
333:Jonyungk
317:Jonyungk
200:today.--
173:Jonyungk
47:contribs
39:MilaJECD
35:unsigned
1489:are not
1394:ReactOS
1280:Selotll
1165:ReactOS
898:Praeses
835:Cleanup
742:Quarrel
657:contrib
581:Rjd0060
487:Insects
464:(phew!)
257:WP:LOTM
223:WP:LOTM
147:cmadler
127:cmadler
1876:or on
1778:or on
1609:. The
1563:Dom497
1411:Gyrobo
1365:-- Joe
1241:Bill
1094:Risker
984:my RfA
907:Expand
889:Wikify
777:CNBC-e
517:(talk)
94:readd.
1527:NOTE:
1436:Usb10
1004:Samir
857:Kenaf
853:Merge
731:Stubs
460:think
1981:talk
1954:talk
1925:talk
1817:talk
1717:talk
1678:The
1643:talk
1584:talk
1571:talk
1466:talk
1415:talk
1388:Hi!
1369:talk
1347:NIST
1284:talk
1278:."--
1254:talk
1227:talk
1205:talk
1197:talk
1152:talk
1134:talk
1118:talk
1098:talk
1053:talk
1015:Tinu
1006:and
994:and
959:talk
707:talk
692:talk
678:talk
653:talk
624:talk
600:talk
585:talk
568:RE:
530:talk
503:talk
471:talk
443:talk
419:talk
337:talk
321:talk
293:talk
278:talk
177:talk
151:talk
131:talk
107:talk
43:talk
1829:of
1731:of
1603:Hi,
1326:--
642:GAR
249:bio
215:bio
74:| (
1983:)
1956:)
1927:)
1880:.
1863:.
1819:)
1782:.
1765:.
1719:)
1711:.
1690:,
1645:)
1621:,
1586:)
1559:--
1417:)
1409:--
1371:)
1328:TS
1286:)
1260:)
1256:•
1229:)
1207:)
1154:)
1136:)
1120:)
1112:--
1100:)
1061:)
1026:-
1002:,
990:,
961:)
709:)
694:)
680:)
659:)
655:•
632:)
608:)
587:)
558:|
532:)
505:)
479:)
451:)
421:)
398:)
394:•
339:)
323:)
295:)
280:)
259:)
225:)
198:}}
192:{{
179:)
153:)
133:)
109:)
82:)
78:-
71:II
49:)
45:•
1979:(
1952:(
1923:(
1815:(
1715:(
1641:(
1582:(
1574:)
1567:(
1464:(
1413:(
1367:(
1282:(
1252:(
1225:(
1203:(
1195:(
1150:(
1132:(
1116:(
1096:(
1056:·
1051:(
957:(
705:(
690:(
676:(
651:(
627:·
622:(
603:·
598:(
583:(
528:(
501:(
474:·
469:(
446:·
441:(
417:(
396:C
392:T
390:(
335:(
319:(
291:(
276:(
255:/
251:/
247:/
245:c
243:/
241:t
239:(
221:/
217:/
213:/
211:c
209:/
207:t
205:(
175:(
149:(
129:(
105:(
80:c
76:t
41:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.