38:
The method shown on my User Page to define electron mass from the energy equation, E1/E2=E2/E3, has been rewritten so that relationships are more clearly described. The intent of the change is to resolve (answer) questions relating to units used. I am sure that I will be advised if questions remain.
474:
Hi again. You wrote that "The values length and time then become either quantized or uncertain so that the (E=hv) expression, at some high energy level does not apply". Well, the equation E=hv represents a fusion of two concepts, that of energy and that of frequency, and it seems unlikely that once
509:
Thanks a lot for information concerning electron as a trapped photon. I read you page and will gradually look through all the material. One thing which I wonder about is how much does the Kerr Newman solution depend on the presence of mass. Will singularity still be present if instead of mass only
425:
Dear Don, yes, I see a problem with your formula, for example it is even dimensionally incorrect. ;-) It is very clear that no sensible combination of the speed of light, Newton's constant, and Planck's constant (and numbers of order one) can give you the
Compton wavelength. Instead, the only
454:
Hi Don. Thank you for your note on my talk page. It is fun to play with the natural constants. Consider an oscilator with a frequency (ν rotations per second) so big, that the quantum energy (h·ν joule) is so big, that the relativistic mass (h·ν·c kilogram) is so big that half the
623:
426:
quantity that has the dimension of length that you get in this way is the Planck length, about 20 orders of magnitude shorter than the electron
Compton wavelength. Sorry to say but most of the section of the black hole electron article is nonsensical. All the best, Lubos --
475:
fused they would ever separate again. Whether time and space is discrete or continuous is an ancient question, and no answer is final. The socalled atoms are not really atoms as they can be divided. An elementary particle does not define a point in space. An so on.
648:) 17:01, 18 September 2008 (UTC) Hi Enemyunknown: Those theorists who believe the electron has internal structure, will now find there can be little doubt remaining that the electron is a gravitationally confined entity. " See,
412:
674:
Thanks for the message on my talk page. It's something I'm definitely intrigued by -- but I'm afraid it's going to have to sit on my "to look into" pile for the foreseeable time being, until I can properly do it justice.
459:(h·ν·G·c meter) is so big that a photon need one second to travel it. Then h·ν·G·c=1 second and ν=h·G·c=5.47574·10 rotations per second. You find that one square second equals 5.47574·10 rotations. This is strange.
522:
527:
164:
Thanks Don; Now I see how it was done. I still don't know what those relations could be used for except subsituting some constants for others. It doesn't look like making a life much easier.
254:
99:
60:"As noted under Matter-wave quantum, the Planck constant can be derived from the electron mass, light velocity and the gravitational constant. h = 2mc(3Gm)exp 1/3, times(2pi)exp 5/3"
516:
I think the key to realizing the potential of these ideas is using sufficiently powerful computers to simulate Planck scale interactions between gravity and electromagnetism.
519:
PS. As someone already stated it would be much easier to read the formulas and follow their manipulations if they were provided in math format, heres some random example:
139:
185:
119:
270:
513:
One other question which I have about your page is that you state time below Planck scale is meaningless but is there any solid reason for this?
63:
Could you show me shortly how it can be derived so I could save time otherwise wasted on looking for the derivation. Of course I understand that
618:{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}F&={\frac {1}{4\pi \varepsilon _{r}\varepsilon _{0}}}{\frac {q_{1}q_{2}}{r^{2}}}\end{aligned}}}
653:
649:
190:
66:
631:
24:
Hi Don. I'm afraid I won't have enough time to do a proper job researching this in the near future. --
456:
495:
480:
464:
627:
431:
54:
124:
680:
656:
641:
441:
152:
40:
491:
476:
460:
170:
104:
654:
http://donjstevensaolcom.blogspot.com/2010/02/gravitationally-collapsed-electron.html
650:
http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/discussionpost/Electron_as_a_ring_singularity_56595
427:
259:
142:
676:
407:{\displaystyle h=2mc(3Gm)^{1/3}\times (2\pi )^{5/3}=4\pi mc(12\pi ^{2}Gm)^{1/3}}
25:
49:
Derivation of relation between gravitational constant and electron wavelength
684:
664:
635:
499:
484:
468:
449:
435:
262:
155:
145:
43:
28:
440:
Lubos: Explanation of units is now shown on your Talk page.--
16:
Note: Material older than May, 2006 has been deleted.
151:
Hi Jim; Derivation sequence is now on your Talk page--
525:
273:
193:
173:
127:
107:
69:
617:
406:
248:
179:
133:
113:
93:
267:PS. You may use regular expressions like e.g.
8:
640:Hi Enemyunknown: Reply is on your Talk page.
249:{\displaystyle 4\pi mc(12\pi ^{2}Gm)^{1/3}}
603:
592:
582:
575:
566:
556:
540:
526:
524:
394:
390:
374:
339:
335:
309:
305:
272:
236:
232:
216:
192:
172:
126:
106:
76:
68:
94:{\displaystyle \lambda ={\frac {h}{mc}}}
510:electromagnetic energy is considered?
7:
256:even if it's exactly the same thing.
14:
636:04:21, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
387:
364:
332:
322:
302:
289:
229:
206:
1:
685:20:09, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
450:15:11, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
436:20:32, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
101:but I miss relation between
263:12:11, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
167:Personally, I'd rahter use
156:14:59, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
146:21:49, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
700:
665:14:03, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
500:16:03, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
485:07:54, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
469:20:51, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
414:which are easier to read.
44:16:32, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
660:
645:
445:
134:{\displaystyle \lambda }
29:15:07, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
619:
408:
250:
181:
135:
115:
95:
620:
409:
251:
182:
136:
116:
96:
523:
457:Schwarzschild radius
271:
191:
171:
125:
105:
67:
421:Black hole electron
20:Black hole electron
615:
613:
490:See my talk page.
404:
246:
177:
131:
111:
91:
609:
573:
180:{\displaystyle h}
114:{\displaystyle G}
89:
691:
624:
622:
621:
616:
614:
610:
608:
607:
598:
597:
596:
587:
586:
576:
574:
572:
571:
570:
561:
560:
541:
413:
411:
410:
405:
403:
402:
398:
379:
378:
348:
347:
343:
318:
317:
313:
255:
253:
252:
247:
245:
244:
240:
221:
220:
186:
184:
183:
178:
140:
138:
137:
132:
120:
118:
117:
112:
100:
98:
97:
92:
90:
88:
77:
699:
698:
694:
693:
692:
690:
689:
688:
672:
612:
611:
599:
588:
578:
577:
562:
552:
545:
533:
521:
520:
423:
386:
370:
331:
301:
269:
268:
228:
212:
189:
188:
169:
168:
123:
122:
103:
102:
81:
65:
64:
51:
36:
22:
12:
11:
5:
697:
695:
671:
668:
606:
602:
595:
591:
585:
581:
569:
565:
559:
555:
551:
548:
544:
539:
536:
534:
532:
529:
528:
505:
422:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
382:
377:
373:
369:
366:
363:
360:
357:
354:
351:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
327:
324:
321:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
297:
294:
291:
288:
285:
282:
279:
276:
265:
257:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
224:
219:
215:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
176:
165:
159:
158:
130:
110:
87:
84:
80:
75:
72:
50:
47:
35:
34:Units question
32:
21:
18:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
696:
687:
686:
682:
678:
669:
667:
666:
662:
658:
655:
651:
647:
643:
638:
637:
633:
629:
625:
604:
600:
593:
589:
583:
579:
567:
563:
557:
553:
549:
546:
542:
537:
535:
530:
517:
514:
511:
507:
503:
501:
497:
493:
488:
486:
482:
478:
472:
470:
466:
462:
458:
452:
451:
447:
443:
438:
437:
433:
429:
420:
399:
395:
391:
383:
380:
375:
371:
367:
361:
358:
355:
352:
349:
344:
340:
336:
328:
325:
319:
314:
310:
306:
298:
295:
292:
286:
283:
280:
277:
274:
266:
264:
261:
258:
241:
237:
233:
225:
222:
217:
213:
209:
203:
200:
197:
194:
174:
166:
163:
162:
161:
160:
157:
154:
150:
149:
148:
147:
144:
128:
108:
85:
82:
78:
73:
70:
61:
58:
56:
48:
46:
45:
42:
33:
31:
30:
27:
19:
17:
673:
639:
628:Enemyunknown
626:
518:
515:
512:
508:
504:
489:
473:
453:
439:
424:
62:
59:
57:you wrote:
55:my talk page
52:
37:
23:
15:
657:DonJStevens
642:DonJStevens
442:DonJStevens
153:DonJStevens
53:Hi Don, on
41:DonJStevens
492:Bo Jacoby
477:Bo Jacoby
461:Bo Jacoby
506:Hello,
428:Lumidek
677:Jheald
26:SCZenz
652:See,
187:than
681:talk
670:Link
661:talk
646:talk
632:talk
496:talk
481:talk
465:talk
446:talk
432:talk
121:and
260:Jim
143:Jim
683:)
663:)
634:)
564:ε
554:ε
550:π
502:.
498:)
487:.
483:)
471:.
467:)
448:)
434:)
372:π
368:12
356:π
329:π
320:×
214:π
210:12
198:π
141:.
129:λ
71:λ
679:(
659:(
644:(
630:(
605:2
601:r
594:2
590:q
584:1
580:q
568:0
558:r
547:4
543:1
538:=
531:F
494:(
479:(
463:(
444:(
430:(
400:3
396:/
392:1
388:)
384:m
381:G
376:2
365:(
362:c
359:m
353:4
350:=
345:3
341:/
337:5
333:)
326:2
323:(
315:3
311:/
307:1
303:)
299:m
296:G
293:3
290:(
287:c
284:m
281:2
278:=
275:h
242:3
238:/
234:1
230:)
226:m
223:G
218:2
207:(
204:c
201:m
195:4
175:h
109:G
86:c
83:m
79:h
74:=
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.