18:
78:
Thank you, Mike Norton, for your comments. I believe, they are misdirected. It is a simple fact that I have not reverted anybody's submission. It is my submission that has been repeatedly reverted without any discussion on the discussion page.
35:
prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
98:. If you want to discuss the article do so on the talk page. Your addition was inappropriate and was reverted by various editors, the edit warring comes from your reversions of those edits.
41:
49:
53:
59:
37:
32:
23:
103:
69:
45:
95:
99:
65:
94:
Statements like the one you added, particularly signed, have no place in an article per
17:
80:
48:
among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
28:
107:
88:
73:
40:. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
52:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
44:to work towards wording and content that gains a
8:
27:according to the reverts you have made on
21:You currently appear to be engaged in an
7:
14:
56:. If the edit warring continues,
16:
1:
42:discuss controversial changes
124:
108:20:16, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
89:12:15, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
74:17:59, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
64:without further notice.
84:
50:dispute resolution
38:three-revert rule
33:three-revert rule
115:
31:. Note that the
20:
123:
122:
118:
117:
116:
114:
113:
112:
54:page protection
12:
11:
5:
121:
119:
111:
110:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
120:
109:
105:
101:
97:
93:
92:
91:
90:
86:
82:
76:
75:
71:
67:
63:
61:
55:
51:
47:
43:
39:
34:
30:
26:
25:
19:
77:
62:from editing
57:
22:
15:
58:you may be
100:Mikenorton
96:WP:SOAPBOX
66:Mikenorton
46:consensus
81:Dsoconno
24:edit war
60:blocked
29:Science
104:talk
85:talk
70:talk
106:)
87:)
72:)
102:(
83:(
68:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
