52:, yes, I certainly have a fondness for process, in all its multifarious forms. And I can get on board with the platform you present. I too am peeved by vote tallies. That's not how things are supposed to work! But even our mutual peeving is not, to me, reason enough to remove a comment. As I see it, many less-than-brilliant things are said on Knowledge (XXG), and most deserve to stand. It's a stretch for me to see the offending section as 'disruptive' when collapsed. I understand your issue about the drive-by nature of the comment, but I still don't think that rises to the level of removal. We both know the light/heat ratio on all things Gamergate is suboptimal. It's
536:
293:
1024:
840:
177:, I apologize, I'm not sure I'll be of much help. There are some pretty reliable sources which call SRS "controversial." Now I think that controversy is all about denizens of less salubrious subreddits being, for lack of a better term, jerks, but unfortunately, whether for good or bad reasons, it seems like a fair characterization given the sources. If you want to tell me why you think the adjective doesn't fit, I'm all ears.
655:
461:
82:
730:
256:
Don't worry about my feelings, I just want to avoid cruftiness and forced POV. The IP has demonstrated through additional comments that they have an axe to grind with SRS, which was obvious from the last attempt to force their synthesis into the article. If SRS is controversial, I expect it would not
191:
Not asking for help, was asking for your input as someone who is an established editor. "Controversial" in the sense of the wiki article is related to objectionable or illegal content, or that generated sizeable actual controversy such as the_donald, rather than controversial because they came top of
209:
Thank you
Dumuzid, for being reasonable about this. I have no axe to grind, I am not an SPA, and I don't want to cause trouble. I read an article saying SRS was controversial and I attempted to add it. It has been an unmitigated disaster ever since. I actually would also welcome your input -
473:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before
Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
667:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before
Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
241:
I apologize yet again for mischarecterizing your request! It strikes me that you've nicely identified the problem, that is, differing semantic values of the word "controversial." I'll think about it and leave any thoughts I have that I deem worth sharing.
35:. In my case, and beyond the current discussions, I have pet peeves for, amongst other things, explicit vote counts or vote tallies in RfCs; for mid-discussion claims of consensus by involved editors; and for the use of the word "sources" in article text. -
94:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before
Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
593:-- no problem, and as I said, good luck! I can't think of a better place off the top of my head, but it's probably better to ask a more involved administrator. I'll think about it a bit and let you know if anything occurs to me. Happy Friday!
416:! I basically agree, but it's a bit more complicated than that, as it seems "artefact" is something of a recent British preference, and both spellings are viable in Britain, while "artifact" is dramatically preferred stateside (see, e.g.,
570:
Thank you for helping me out with the study! I have a quick question - do you think VP Misc is the right place to post that kind of message? Could I repost it somewhere else to get more visibility without annoying anyone?
154:
Afternoon, I would appreciate your input to an RFC introduced by an SPA relating to the inclusion of SRS in the "Controversial Reddit communities". SPA has canvassed to overturn 3 years of consensus on a 4 day vote.
695:
501:
122:
679:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
485:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
106:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
338:
315:
420:). As such, I am all in for the "i", but certainly not something about which I have strong feelings (like other minor grammatical trifles). Cheers, and thanks for stopping by.
785:), why thank you! The wages of an overly bookish youth, I think. One of those words that you very rarely encounter, but once you do, you never forget it. Have a great day!
397:
In archaeology, artefact is the common
British spelling, artifact the common American spelling. We use whichever is suitable for the variety of English used in the article.
902:
With all due respect, certainty is a suspect quality to my mind. That being said, it also means I'm wrong a lot. But such is the nature of a sublunary existence! Cheers.
195:
In the end, whether it is included or not, I would rather have other users input as to what the content should say rather than the SPA's current motivated narrative.
435:
885:... hadn't you better stand back and watch a minute or 300 to see if someone else, who's more certain of what the right thing to do is, comes along? Regards!
994:
article, about the statement that his claims were unproven. In my opinion the source is too weak to make that statement. Please let's discuss it there.
31:
Expanding on the discussion over there ... I think, from some of your previous comments, that we might share a common affinity for things being done
210:
whether you feel it does or does not belong. You are one of the few editors who remains level headed during disputes so your opinion is valuable.
966:
you have my apologies; I must have somehow gotten confused with diffs. That was not my intention and I have restored the tag. My mistake.
709:
515:
136:
211:
924:
893:
148:
782:
705:
511:
132:
688:
494:
115:
1009:
192:
a pop culture analytics "poll" for relative toxicity which the writer of outlined reasons against taking at face value.
700:
506:
367:
about which preferred gender pronouns to use in the article. So I thought I'd give you a heads up that I'm starting a
127:
298:
Thank you for "I simply try to do my best to make things a little clearer and read a little better.", for improving
1031:
847:
548:
Wishing you a happy holiday season! Times flies and 2018 is around the corner. Thank you for your contributions. ~
434:
It is a bit more complicated, I agree. Just like archaeology/archeology, both of which are now used in the States.
949:
56:
come to digital life. I'm not quite sure where I'm headed with that, so I will simply say have a wonderful day.
676:
482:
103:
215:
997:
934:
535:
941:
346:
328:
553:
442:
403:
614:
961:
945:
663:
469:
90:
72:
810:
776:
757:
672:
478:
99:
1001:
622:
379:
262:
200:
160:
292:
417:
1040:
971:
918:
907:
887:
856:
825:
790:
637:
632:
I'm not at 5RR--to be clear, activism does not provide an excuse for 3RR violations. Cheers!
598:
576:
425:
372:
364:
342:
324:
247:
182:
61:
17:
684:
490:
111:
1005:
549:
437:
413:
398:
687:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
680:
493:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
486:
368:
114:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
107:
752:
613:
It seems, based on your current edit warring, that you're unfamiliar with the concept of
387:
806:
772:
747:
618:
258:
236:
196:
172:
156:
967:
903:
821:
786:
633:
594:
588:
572:
421:
243:
178:
57:
53:
1013:
975:
953:
927:
911:
896:
829:
814:
794:
763:
729:
713:
654:
641:
626:
602:
580:
557:
519:
460:
445:
429:
406:
350:
332:
266:
251:
219:
204:
186:
164:
140:
81:
65:
39:
940:
Cleanup tags are not to be removed without discussion. Please restore the tag at
1039:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
855:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
257:
be hard to actually find a real article to back it up in an encyclopedic way.
47:
36:
991:
983:
691:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
497:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
118:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
299:
363:
In the last several months, you've participated in a discussion on
694:
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review
500:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
121:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
1018:
834:
742:
It's not everyday that I have to look up a word -- thanks for
418:
https://writingexplained.org/artefact-vs-artifact-difference
617:. Go ahead and take some time to get familiar with it.
879:
743:
675:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
481:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
310:
304:
102:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
990:
Hi! I've added a new section to the discussion of the
371:to hopefully resolve this issue! You can find the
8:
308:, for comments on the BLP noticeboard, for "
995:
820:And in style, for that matter! Cheers!
1037:Do not edit the contents of this page.
853:Do not edit the contents of this page.
337:Two years ago, you were recipient no.
7:
664:2018 Arbitration Committee elections
470:2017 Arbitration Committee elections
91:2016 Arbitration Committee elections
677:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
483:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
104:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
648:ArbCom 2018 election voter message
454:ArbCom 2017 election voter message
24:
1022:
838:
728:
653:
566:Thanks for filling in the survey
534:
459:
291:
149:Controversial Reddit communities
80:
698:and submit your choices on the
504:and submit your choices on the
341:of Precious, a prize of QAI! --
805:that you sleep well at night.
661:Hello, Dumuzid. Voting in the
467:Hello, Dumuzid. Voting in the
388:18:27, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
88:Hello, Dumuzid. Voting in the
66:16:05, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
40:15:52, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
27:Things that make me go urgh...
1:
1014:17:30, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
916:Cheers mate! See you around.
795:01:09, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
764:01:01, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
714:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
558:00:25, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
141:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
642:02:08, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
627:02:07, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
520:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
446:19:58, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
430:19:45, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
407:19:41, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
351:07:42, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
333:14:31, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
125:and submit your choices on
1073:
706:MediaWiki message delivery
603:12:31, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
581:18:44, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
512:MediaWiki message delivery
133:MediaWiki message delivery
123:the candidates' statements
976:13:15, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
954:08:44, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
928:05:12, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
912:05:08, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
897:04:51, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
727:
533:
830:22:42, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
815:22:10, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
373:relevant discussion here
267:22:51, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
252:17:53, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
220:17:41, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
205:17:27, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
187:15:50, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
165:15:09, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
305:by a single better word
942:Antifa (United States)
1035:of past discussions.
851:of past discussions.
673:Arbitration Committee
479:Arbitration Committee
100:Arbitration Committee
73:ArbCom Elections 2016
355:
689:arbitration policy
495:arbitration policy
316:awesome Wikipedian
302:and others, often
116:arbitration policy
75:: Voting now open!
1060:
1059:
1047:
1046:
1041:current talk page
1016:
1000:comment added by
982:Statement on the
876:
875:
863:
862:
857:current talk page
769:
768:
750:" to my lexicon!
609:Friendly reminder
563:
562:
18:User talk:Dumuzid
1064:
1056:
1049:
1048:
1026:
1025:
1019:
965:
923:
921:
892:
890:
880:When in doubt...
872:
865:
864:
842:
841:
835:
762:
760:
755:
754:Ben · Salvidrim!
732:
725:
724:
721:Vocabulary award
657:
592:
538:
531:
530:
463:
440:
401:
385:
382:
356:Zoë Quinn's PGPs
314:", - you are an
313:
307:
295:
240:
176:
84:
51:
1072:
1071:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1052:
1023:
988:
962:Wikieditor19920
959:
946:Wikieditor19920
938:
919:
917:
888:
886:
883:
868:
839:
803:
801:It is important
758:
753:
751:
723:
718:
717:
658:
650:
611:
586:
568:
529:
524:
523:
464:
456:
438:
399:
395:
383:
380:
358:
321:
320:
309:
303:
296:
281:
234:
170:
152:
145:
144:
128:the voting page
85:
77:
45:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1070:
1068:
1058:
1057:
1045:
1044:
1027:
987:
980:
979:
978:
937:
932:
931:
930:
914:
882:
877:
874:
873:
861:
860:
843:
833:
832:
802:
799:
798:
797:
767:
766:
748:omphaloskepsis
739:
738:
733:
722:
719:
696:the candidates
659:
652:
651:
649:
646:
645:
644:
610:
607:
606:
605:
567:
564:
561:
560:
545:
544:
542:Happy Holidays
539:
528:
527:Happy Holidays
525:
502:the candidates
465:
458:
457:
455:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
394:
391:
365:Talk:Zoë Quinn
357:
354:
311:I amuse myself
290:
288:
286:living persons
283:
282:
280:
277:
276:
275:
274:
273:
272:
271:
270:
269:
227:
226:
225:
224:
223:
222:
193:
151:
146:
86:
79:
78:
76:
70:
69:
68:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1069:
1055:
1051:
1050:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1033:
1028:
1021:
1020:
1017:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1003:
999:
993:
985:
981:
977:
973:
969:
963:
958:
957:
956:
955:
951:
947:
943:
936:
935:WP:CLEANUPTAG
933:
929:
926:
922:
915:
913:
909:
905:
901:
900:
899:
898:
895:
891:
881:
878:
871:
867:
866:
858:
854:
850:
849:
844:
837:
836:
831:
827:
823:
819:
818:
817:
816:
812:
808:
800:
796:
792:
788:
784:
781:
778:
774:
771:
770:
765:
761:
756:
749:
745:
741:
740:
737:
734:
731:
726:
720:
716:
715:
711:
707:
703:
702:
697:
692:
690:
686:
682:
678:
674:
669:
666:
665:
656:
647:
643:
639:
635:
631:
630:
629:
628:
624:
620:
616:
608:
604:
600:
596:
590:
585:
584:
583:
582:
578:
574:
565:
559:
555:
551:
547:
546:
543:
540:
537:
532:
526:
522:
521:
517:
513:
509:
508:
503:
498:
496:
492:
488:
484:
480:
475:
472:
471:
462:
453:
447:
444:
441:
436:
433:
432:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
410:
409:
408:
405:
402:
392:
390:
389:
386:
376:
374:
370:
366:
361:
360:Hi Dumuzid,
353:
352:
348:
344:
340:
335:
334:
330:
326:
319:
317:
312:
306:
301:
294:
289:
287:
278:
268:
264:
260:
255:
254:
253:
249:
245:
238:
233:
232:
231:
230:
229:
228:
221:
217:
213:
212:76.79.205.162
208:
207:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
189:
188:
184:
180:
174:
169:
168:
167:
166:
162:
158:
150:
147:
143:
142:
138:
134:
130:
129:
124:
119:
117:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
93:
92:
83:
74:
71:
67:
63:
59:
55:
49:
44:
43:
42:
41:
38:
34:
33:the right way
26:
19:
1053:
1036:
1030:
996:— Preceding
989:
939:
920:Usedtobecool
889:Usedtobecool
884:
869:
852:
846:
804:
779:
735:
699:
693:
670:
662:
660:
615:WP: ACTIVISM
612:
569:
541:
505:
499:
476:
468:
466:
396:
377:
362:
359:
343:Gerda Arendt
336:
325:Gerda Arendt
322:
297:
285:
284:
153:
126:
120:
97:
89:
87:
32:
30:
1029:This is an
845:This is an
736:#TIL a word
701:voting page
550:K.e.coffman
507:voting page
439:Doug Weller
414:Doug Weller
400:Doug Weller
378:Regards. --
54:Sayre's law
685:topic bans
491:topic bans
381:Shibboleth
112:topic bans
1054:Archive 1
992:Bob Lazar
984:Bob Lazar
870:Archive 1
807:Carptrash
773:Salvidrim
681:site bans
487:site bans
108:site bans
1010:contribs
998:unsigned
783:contribs
619:OnceASpy
393:Artifact
279:Precious
259:Koncorde
237:Koncorde
197:Koncorde
173:Koncorde
157:Koncorde
1032:archive
986:article
968:Dumuzid
904:Dumuzid
848:archive
822:Dumuzid
787:Dumuzid
634:Dumuzid
595:Dumuzid
589:Allikka
573:Allikka
422:Dumuzid
300:Kussara
244:Dumuzid
179:Dumuzid
58:Dumuzid
1002:Cutter
744:adding
412:Hello
369:WP:RFC
48:Ryk72
37:Ryk72
16:<
1006:talk
972:talk
950:talk
908:talk
826:talk
811:talk
791:talk
777:talk
710:talk
671:The
638:talk
623:talk
599:talk
577:talk
554:talk
516:talk
477:The
443:talk
426:talk
404:talk
347:talk
339:1710
329:talk
263:talk
248:talk
216:talk
201:talk
183:talk
161:talk
137:talk
98:The
62:talk
384:ink
375:.
1012:)
1008:•
974:)
952:)
944:.
910:)
828:)
813:)
793:)
712:)
704:.
683:,
640:)
625:)
601:)
579:)
556:)
518:)
510:.
489:,
428:)
349:)
331:)
323:--
318:!
265:)
250:)
218:)
203:)
185:)
163:)
139:)
131:.
110:,
64:)
1043:.
1004:(
970:(
964::
960:@
948:(
925:✨
906:(
894:✨
859:.
824:(
809:(
789:(
780:·
775:(
759:✉
746:"
708:(
636:(
621:(
597:(
591::
587:@
575:(
552:(
514:(
424:(
345:(
327:(
261:(
246:(
239::
235:@
214:(
199:(
181:(
175::
171:@
159:(
135:(
60:(
50::
46:@
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
