165:
to wikibooks is part of a wider aim of broadening the links between wikibooks and wikipedia. I think that the poor development of the wikibooks project (when compared to wikipedia) is in part due to its hierarchical structure (again when compared to wikipedia). I aim to diffuse this problem without disturbing the practical considerations of creating a book (the linearity and style). I am also working on a way of linking wikibooks to wikipedia in such a way that the links will be easy to remove at a later stage. I think these developments would help wikibooks to grow by allowing developers to move more freely between wikibooks and wikipedia. Any comments or suggestions?
164:
The wikibook's I've linked to so far are the most developed in the mathematics section. Maybe I shouldn't make links to pages which are still to be developed although I note this practice is encouraged in wikipedia to draw attention to articles that need work. My aim in adding links from wikipedia
143:
I didn't want edit war either. Your suggestions were constructive and I agree with most. I provided one more revision which I hope accommodates your principal views as well as mine. I revised some of mine as a result of your suggestsion. See revised
253:
In case I make a mistake wo this, orthogonal polynomials (or any vectors in an inner product space) are orthogonal if <f, g: -->
76:
72:
68:
64:
127:
and myself have a difference of opinion on a section of that article. If you have the time, could you take a look there and at
60:
56:
52:
48:
44:
40:
36:
32:
208:
The image that was there was pretty yellowed, so I scanned my copy & uploaded it. Was that a problem? (I'm new to this)
28:
89:
Sexual privacy sounds fine to me. Still, if you want a change, I might be able to figure something out.
166:
149:
17:
227:- go vote for it so it gets implemented :-) (I remember you asked for something like this before)
325:
308:). If you're talking about just two polynomials rather than about a sequence, then you have no "
213:
132:
178:
358:
124:
90:
103:
387:
334:
324:, and orthogonality of two polynomials has nothing to do with something being equal to 1.
259:
242:
235:
153:
145:
128:
333:
I condsider this a personal attack! Or I would, if I could understand it. Maybe.
209:
99:
258:(with the obvious inner product as defined in the article), correct or not?
231:
228:
194:
190:
120:
113:
300:, and that would be the same as saying the members of that sequence are
224:
283:
of polynomials indexed by subscripts then one could say <f
119:
Hi! As you are one of the people who has edited the article "
348:
267:= 0. In order that such a thing as Kronkecker's delta δ
241:
Thanks for the heads up! I've given it ten votes :)
381:but his talk page is scary. it's full of .. maths.
225:http://bugzilla.wikipedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377
357:I need to have a look for scientific studies on
266:No -- f and g are orthogonal if <f, g: -->
123:" recently, I would like to ask your advice.
8:
189:Hi Dysprosia - do you know which species of
106:because the poster posted it in the archive.
346:I saw this on the #wikipedia IRC channel.
316:. Kronecker's delta is equal to 1 when
361:. it's a rather disturbing phenomenon
279:have to mean something. If one had a
148:article and additional explanation at
7:
131:and provide your input? Thanks! --
24:
371:ask dysprosia. he's really smart
271:even be defined, the subscripts
77:User talk:Dysprosia/Archive (13)
73:User talk:Dysprosia/Archive (12)
69:User talk:Dysprosia/Archive (11)
65:User talk:Dysprosia/Archive (10)
380:
377:
370:
367:
356:
353:
61:User talk:Dysprosia/Archive (9)
57:User talk:Dysprosia/Archive (8)
53:User talk:Dysprosia/Archive (7)
49:User talk:Dysprosia/Archive (6)
45:User talk:Dysprosia/Archive (5)
41:User talk:Dysprosia/Archive (4)
37:User talk:Dysprosia/Archive (3)
33:User talk:Dysprosia/Archive (2)
1:
216:]] 15:55, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
29:User talk:Dysprosia/Archive
404:
337:16:57, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC) ;)
351:
197:09:34, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
181:06:49, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
169:15:30, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)
156:15:22, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)
135:01:33, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
93:02:41, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC)
390:17:49, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
262:10:08, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
245:00:17, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
238:00:07, 2004 Sep 4 (UTC)
328:00:11, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
249:Orthogonal polynomials
210:wrp103 (Bill Pringle)
27:Old talk in archive:
160:Linking to wikibooks
150:talk:Sex of rearing
18:User talk:Dysprosia
342:seen on #wikipedia
220:``monospace text``
112:Please comment on
385:
384:
359:pseudomathematics
177:You're not on?!?
395:
368:<vespers: -->
349:
403:
402:
398:
397:
396:
394:
393:
392:
354:<prumpf: -->
344:
299:
294:
288:
270:
257:
251:
222:
206:
204:K & R Cover
193:your pic is? -
187:
175:
162:
141:
117:
87:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
401:
399:
383:
382:
379:
378:<Kate-: -->
376:
373:
372:
369:
366:
363:
362:
355:
352:
343:
340:
339:
338:
330:
329:
297:
290:
284:
268:
255:
250:
247:
221:
218:
205:
202:
200:
186:
183:
174:
171:
167:Barnaby dawson
161:
158:
146:sex of rearing
140:
139:sex of rearing
137:
116:
110:
109:
108:
98:Moved here by
86:
83:
82:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
400:
391:
389:
388:-- orthogonal
375:
374:
365:
364:
360:
350:
347:
341:
336:
335:-- orthogonal
332:
331:
327:
326:Michael Hardy
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
293:
287:
282:
278:
274:
265:
264:
263:
261:
248:
246:
244:
239:
237:
233:
229:
226:
219:
217:
215:
211:
203:
201:
198:
196:
192:
184:
182:
180:
172:
170:
168:
159:
157:
155:
151:
147:
138:
136:
134:
130:
129:Talk:Variable
126:
122:
115:
111:
107:
105:
101:
96:
95:
94:
92:
84:
81:
80:
79:(most recent)
78:
74:
70:
66:
62:
58:
54:
50:
46:
42:
38:
34:
30:
19:
386:
345:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
291:
285:
280:
276:
272:
252:
240:
223:
207:
199:
188:
176:
163:
142:
118:
97:
91:Lockeownzj00
88:
26:
25:
302:orthonormal
232:Kate Turner
152:. Regards.
306:orthogonal
260:Dysprosia
243:Dysprosia
154:Alteripse
281:sequence
191:mulberry
185:Mulberry
121:Variable
114:Variable
100:Cyrius
304:(not
295:: -->
85:Borat
16:<
312:and
275:and
236:Talk
214:Talk
179:Ambi
125:Taku
67:--
296:= δ
289:, f
254:= δ
195:MPF
173:AIM
133:FOo
75:--
71:--
63:--
59:--
55:--
51:--
47:--
43:--
39:--
35:--
31:--
320:=
298:ij
269:ij
256:ij
234:|
230:—
212:|
322:j
318:i
314:j
310:i
292:j
286:i
277:j
273:i
104:✎
102:|
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.