22:
131:
Are you holding people who are deliberately removing relevant and highly newsworthy content from those pages to the same standards? The investigation I'm talking about is looking into what edits those people have made and whether their accounts are suitable for wikipedia. Including topic-banning them
132:
specifically. Not that those bans mean anything because people can just switch IP's in seconds. Make that effort and show everyone that you're primarily a reference source and not a mouthpiece for a partisan and invalidated point of view.
97:
When in a content dispute on an article talk page please stick to discussing the content and avoid commenting on the editors. It is inappropriate to suggest that editors who disagree with you
62:
55:
47:
43:
104:
As I have just informed you above this area is under special sanctions and editors working in this area are expected to closely adhere to
Knowledge policies. This includes our
70:
73:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
66:
51:
133:
117:
105:
79:
28:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.
112:
policy. Failure to do so can result in sanctions that range from blocking to topic bans.
21:
109:
42:. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
39:
141:
125:
87:
34:
imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
98:
8:
61:For additional information, please see the
46:is in effect. Any administrator may impose
38:You have shown interest in and edits about
58:, when making edits related to the topic.
50:on editors who do not strictly follow
7:
93:Discuss the article, not the editors
63:guidance on discretionary sanctions
14:
20:
1:
158:
56:page-specific restrictions
142:11:51, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
126:00:38, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
88:00:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
137:
99:should be "investigated"
67:Arbitration Committee's
44:discretionary sanctions
52:Knowledge's policies
110:no personal attacks
16:You're cool, bro!
124:
123:
86:
85:
149:
122:
116:
84:
78:
24:
157:
156:
152:
151:
150:
148:
147:
146:
95:
76:
75:
25:
12:
11:
5:
155:
153:
145:
144:
94:
91:
26:
19:
18:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
154:
143:
139:
135:
130:
129:
128:
127:
121:
120:
113:
111:
107:
102:
100:
92:
90:
89:
83:
82:
74:
72:
68:
64:
59:
57:
53:
49:
45:
41:
36:
35:
33:
23:
17:
118:
114:
103:
96:
80:
77:
60:
37:
31:
29:
27:
15:
115:Thank you.
134:EGarrett01
69:decision
54:, or the
48:sanctions
119:HighInBC
106:civility
81:HighInBC
65:and the
40:COVID-19
30:It does
138:talk
108:and
71:here
32:not
140:)
101:.
136:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
