User talk:Ebricca - Knowledge

1818:'guerrilla sceptics'. And as far as the broader community of Knowledge contributors are concerned, it conforms to the policies, arrived at through consensus over very many years, in regard to neutrality, appropriate sourcing etc. If it is 'biased' it is so because it matches the 'biases' inherent in an encyclopaedia that per policy prefers science and academic sources to conspiracy theories and magical thinking. You may not personally like such policy-induced 'bias', but it would appear that readers in general do, considering how often they return to Knowledge as a reference source. Anyone is of course free to start their own alternative to Knowledge, or find one of the many existing ones, and read or contribute to that instead. Meanwhile, our encyclopaedia, our rules. Knowledge has its faults certainly, but not caving in to the demands of magic woo-water peddlers to help them sell their diluted-to-nothingness 'remedies' isn't one of them 1622:

Mendel experiments with radiating drosophila could be seen as degeneration but not evolution. I am just not so sure if the "by accident" and "selection" is capable of creating things like eyes etc. something feels off - but as said, it is IMHO professional suicide to utter this publicly so most won't dare. Also if you look at the human genome something is very "off" - it is too brittle - giving rise to many aberrations (above baseline miscarriages etc.) as if someone was making genetic experiments .. what I am saying - in a way I am just quite unsure what still can be trusted - much feels too "white washed" - "move along, nothing to see"

1538: 1063:

greed. later down it becomes even more interesting as "untreated" seems the keyword - someone like a ****** company has to extract urea for it to become really beneficial .. jokes aside i tried if for myself today as I had doubts as well - soaked my hand in fresh one for 10 minutes after having strong blue blemishes and my hand significantly improved .. I know that is non scientific - primary source material is never allowed .. the pharisees may rejoice .. Ebricca (talk) 05:00, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

1089: 963: 897: 730: 613: 540: 464: 807: 1018: 140: 88: 1106:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 1503:

in a way I am often not so sure if they are so fringe .. no for real .. there is just a science(tm) dictum almost everybody knows and does not want to risk their career for .. outliers / unexplained edge cases by themselves would warrant by definition to topple or at least question theories - wp just

420:

for me I see the EU as a doomed project, built rather for ruin then prosperity .. but most likely by intention in this way - with the currency, how laws are detached from society and created by the lobby, formation of the police state and intimidation not to leave the ship like Greece might have, in

1572:

Darwin won the battle against Lamarck. That sealed the victory of the theory of evolution. He did not compete against creationism, creationism was not even on the table, same as Usain Bolt never competed in the Special Olympics. Even in Darwin's time, scientists understood that GODDIDIT is not much

416:

well its sad that critical comments tend to be eradicated on WP .. like being another outlet of the mass media .. worse even the comments are constantly rewritten -- i don't know about ukip .. possibly they are realists to a certain degree, though i don't like some of their arguments - they seem to

1817:

This article has frequently been discussed as an example of a page that outsiders (usually, but not always, homeopaths with an obvious agenda) have claimed in one way or another to be 'biased'. Discussed by Knowledge contributors generally, not the very small minority who consider themselves to be

1716:

hmm thanks .. I should have looked closer - so it feels like jimmy has a god complex or it is a kowtow to something else .. for better or worse mainstream is their savior - wp lives with science(tm) as sanctioned pov / npov has become obsolete - so the rewrites since 2014 do make more sense now ..

1185:

the interesting part is that most vocal critics are seemingly not allowed on the page - the german wp has the strongest criticism to date and is not included in the front - where markus fiedler / wikihausen would have to be mentioned - my comment being deleted with the notice "not a forum" - thats

1062:

pretty interesting npov it feels like one of the interesting articles where much of the real discussion is hidden in the archives .. the intro phrase "No scientific evidence exists to support any beneficial health claims of urine therapy." seems just plain wrong - written by ideology and pecuniary

862:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

274:

the reason for it being the rapid reporting - claiming to have the facts without investigation - an analyst coming up with answers so rapidly which should take more time .. to get the person there cut the video etc .. feels a bit like the wtc7 report which was sent over the air before the building

1350:

i mean he still is alive - he made 2 movies about the state of the german wp .. that he teaches at waldorf shouldn't be the issue - i guess there is a history to it, he certainly studied at a university .. to discredit him by his employer feels to be ad hominem .. mainstream not necessarily means

1189:

about scientism / science(tm) that you mention - I agree the scientific method would not be a democracy - it is the search for truth .. scientism is political but rather in the form of a dictatorship - "my subjective truth is greater than yours and the only one allowed" - the c event or event 201

1621:

Just to respond to (Neo-)Darwinism - but that has nothing to do with Fiedler - my impression is that it feels like a form of religion - the stairstep theory for example. Macroevolution is just a theory - microevolution could be seen as adoption to environment, not real creation of something new.

1147:

for me the most interesting part is, that this page exists. It is on top of search engine hits, when searching for wikipedia critizism. Thus effectively silencing other voices. The German wikipedia is real cesspit - even the names of the most vocal critics are in the censor / filter list (markus

1166:

Friend, democracy is a great good, but it is not applicable in every field: science is not a democracy (Knowledge kowtows to mainstream science, being thus undemocratic by definition), doing business is not a democracy (it's called capitalism, which is different from democracy), religions are

1190:

being the poster boy .. about vitalism - unfortunately or even fortunately the proposed creation of life is not possible in the lab - as far as I know - I mean from non-living to living - meaning you always need a living cell first - so to completely call vitalism bogus is also far fetched

1167:

undemocratic (they don't hold public vote upon their dogmas), etc. E.g. vitalism has no right here to be represented of equal value to organic chemistry, it has lost the game, and we rightly shun it. The scientific debate about vitalism has ended long ago, it's dead, let it rest in peace.

625:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

742:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1226:

no the issue is about creating life - honestly - prove me wrong - you need a living cell - sure biochemistry has its place .. every theory has weird parts - even the globe model where one can see too far :) aka over the horizon photography (israel crete being the longest)

1067:

I have a hand cream with urea. I don't use it often, so it isn't a financial burden. I would feel disgusted to insert my hand in urine. Hint: urine is not sterile, it has germs. I'm not a hygiene freak, and some germs are actually good. But still not willing to do it.

1760:

another source is on my talk page as yt links are shunned - in a way it is a well known fact to shift perception via intro parts of disliked topics - science(tm) for the win - (interesting that the comment is allowed to live here but not on the ideological bias page)

278:

In previous cases there were rapidly found passports in perfect condition and simultaneous training scenarios which were playing the same events .. I'm just waiting for confirmation that similar events might have occurred here .. and I stand by what I have written ..

987:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

923:

1148:

fiedler / wikihausen) - which is telling for my part - I am not sure if this comment will even be allowed to stay. I actually searched for their English equal - as I know it exists but was not yet able to find it/her - the sources in the page feel off.

1504:

often feels like painting a "white washed" convenient plain one opinion picture - and I often question qui bono .. I guess I am a bit too old - in the beginnings of wp alternative views were included - or at least the notion that something is unclear

552:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

476:

1568:

And even if the theory of evolution would be proven false, it would be replaced by another naturalistic theory. Not with creationism. Not with intelligent design. There are certain facts, which even if they are true, cannot be investigated through

1431:

can you give me the source? thanks .. i do know that darwinian evolution has its weird edge cases - like the globe model but this might also become a red herring .. maybe he was criticizing that fact but i really would like to see the source.

1616:

For me the psiram allegations about Fiedler applauding creationism still seem like a strawman - strong sources are just not there. He most likely compared the potential accuracy, if it became politically relevant - and someone intentionally

991:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

927:

204:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 770: 653: 580: 504: 424:

it might have very well been another gladio b operation .. like so many before, where its now known (sibel edmonds / daniele ganser) .. and that syria starts to be at peace again might not be well received ..

1325:

Knowledge loves mainstream science, mainstream medicine, mainstream history, and mainstream media with a good reputation for fact checking. There are people who hate these, so they obviously hate Knowledge.

984: 1150:

A comment about political bias - the discussion about left and right is imho futile - for me they are in the end opposing sides of the same coin - if one wants to study this, vashiva is a starting point.

1649:

this page has been rewritten curtesy by the "guerilla sceptics" -- they even stupidly brag about it in recruiting events .. source rob heatherly (a list of the 1000+ rewritten wp pages would be nice)

754:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 637:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 564:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 488:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1460:

hmm ok .. psiram is not the greatest source .. i tried to follow their source - a yt video (youtu.be/4X-3-AwqkLQ) .. which is not available .. at least this seems to be a strawman from psiram ..

839:, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not 1030: 400: 1850:.. :) .. i read the page .. personal attack - means - ad hominem .. but sure i can be completely wrong .. maybe to say "also" by itself already is a "tu quoque" fallacy .. :) .. 1212:

LOL, man. Vitalism as a scientific theory died long ago. There is no respectable scientific journal which publishes "evidence" for vitalism. Because there is no such evidence.

1803:

sure english is not my primary language - so calling it poor - fine but also ad hominem .. "shifting perception" is the expression the group brags about - really not my words

155: 103: 1417:, which for a biology graduate is a token he really hates mainstream science. And he attributed the response to a conspiracy, rather than to his own poor grasp of science. 1789:

Finally, your wording is... very poor. I assume English is not your primary language. In that case, you might want to try editing the wiki for your native language. —

1328:

What was Markus Fiedler? A Waldorf teacher. What are Waldorf teachers known for? Their hate for mainstream science and especially mainstream medicine. And, of course,

690: 704:. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top. 173: 121: 1478:

Okay, my take is rather simple: you have the legal right to hold fringe and pseudoscientific opinions. And Knowledge has the legal right to shun such opinions.

44:

Hello, Ebricca. I made a reply concerting mikado article in my talkpage. I am the computer science major too coincidently. Hope you are having fun too! --

1186:

imho insane as if one writes honestly it has by definition to be a part of the article .. maybe i should double down but am atm not in the mood to do so.

264:

can never be excluded .. and shouldn't .. there are sayings from famous politicians and lawyers that we always tend to underestimate their importance ..

974: 909: 840: 401:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brussels-explosions-ukip-says-bombings-show-eu-freedom-of-movement-is-a-security-threat-a6945566.html

843:

how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the

1118: 844: 836: 796: 920: 784: 667: 594: 229: 940: 440: 403: 386: 372: 303: 291: 1737:

Mate, what the heck are you talking about? This page hasn't had a major re-write in the maybe fifteen years it's been on my watchlist.

1688:

in a way the question who is the chalatan? IMHO the scientism sceptics should be called that - but am unsure if I understood correctly

1026: 1010: 133: 81: 867:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 689:

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether March of Empires should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at

1671: 1717:

hmm and the 2015 fork date of sites like infogalactic do as well - it feels like it's the second time I am realizing the fact ..

1702:

The answer is obvious if you establish which side did Wales defend and which side did he condemn. The situation is asymmetrical.

780: 663: 590: 225: 1370: 816: 763: 646: 573: 497: 21: 216:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

1102:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 775: 658: 585: 509: 221: 421:

the beginning the blocking of any form of referendum to legitimize participation in the EU of member states etc ..

1107: 1103: 864: 978: 913: 1537: 823: 444: 1022: 935: 407: 390: 376: 307: 295: 1823: 1486: 1098: 247: 28: 1841: 1750: 751: 634: 561: 485: 59: 700:

is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on

1033:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.

969: 953: 680: 1707: 1679: 1585: 1494: 1451: 1422: 1386: 1341: 1333: 1286: 1274: 1246: 1217: 1172: 1073: 859: 848: 832: 800: 701: 257:

Well it might have been a rant before .. so ok for the deletion .. but to eradicate it from the log?

1044: 217: 73: 53: 1791: 1329: 930: 385:

Did UKIP or the German Nazis help do it to cause a war with immigrants or the breakup of the EU.

1819: 1782:

Further, insinuations that editors are attempting to "shift perception" can be construed as a

997: 874: 738: 711: 621: 548: 530: 518: 472: 454: 250:

talk page .. was erased less rapidly after second posting though didn't last even half a day

193: 184: 45: 1255:.. :) it was just about your "lol" .. in good humor .. i know wp is a lost case but are you? 1837: 1779:

to determine scientific consensus. And the reliable sources are very clear about homeopathy.

1738: 747: 630: 557: 481: 213: 197: 1371:

https://www.theguardian.com/theobserver/2012/may/13/letters-steiner-maharishi-schools-wrong

1141: 762:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 645:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 572:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 496:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 212:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1776: 1703: 1675: 1581: 1490: 1447: 1418: 1382: 1378: 1337: 1282: 1278: 1242: 1213: 1168: 1126: 1069: 261: 37: 1332:. Fiedler himself is very biased, having an obvious axe to grind against the values of 1034: 759: 642: 569: 493: 209: 201: 1783: 755: 697: 638: 565: 489: 205: 1851: 1804: 1762: 1718: 1689: 1650: 1623: 1577: 1505: 1465: 1433: 1396: 1374: 1352: 1296: 1256: 1228: 1191: 1152: 514: 426: 280: 1565:

Evolutionary theory is moving (evolving). But it's not moving towards creationism.

729: 612: 539: 463: 1031:

Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 12 § Internet social network

1410: 1270: 863:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

835:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

1833: 1663: 1122: 361: 350: 339: 328: 268: 1573:

of a scientific explanation, it's just a lousy excuse for remaining ignorant.

1414: 1142:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Ideological_bias_on_Wikipedia#interesting_page

1241:

Knowledge isn't in the business of proving scientific facts. Neither am I.

1580:

that there is a God. Unfortunately, science cannot answer such questions.

1482: 1464:(btw i think fiedler and pohlmann have the longest psiram articles :) .. 815:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

1017: 766:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

649:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

576:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

500:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

139: 87: 1059: 854:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

1666:.. i didnt bother to add a yt link as original content is shunned .. 147: 1859: 1845: 1827: 1812: 1798: 1770: 1755: 1726: 1711: 1697: 1683: 1658: 1631: 1589: 1513: 1498: 1489:, but there are so many more articles wherein my edits are welcome. 1473: 1455: 1441: 1426: 1404: 1390: 1360: 1345: 1304: 1295:

i mean you brought it up .. but fair - it feels beyond the argument

1290: 1264: 1250: 1236: 1221: 1199: 1176: 1160: 1130: 1077: 1048: 1003: 946: 881: 788: 717: 671: 598: 522: 448: 434: 411: 394: 380: 311: 267:

For my sense it has again the flavor .. I'm not the only one .. see

233: 178: 126: 16:

Hello Ebricca, and welcome to Knowledge. I have a few tips for you:

847:, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about 1643: 1536: 985:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/March of Empires (2nd nomination)

904: 888: 95: 200:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

1446:

The source is psiram. I cannot link to it, since it is blocked.

1021:

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect

769:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

652:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

579:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

503:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

146:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

94:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

1369:

competence, but about Waldorf teachers in general, see e.g.

1087: 869: 805: 138: 86: 417:

me to be conservative and adoring the crown quite a bit

967:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

902:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

750:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

633:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

560:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

484:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

52:

Hi! Please consider linking to new game pages from the

1351:

good fact checking, but rather having the bigger gun

973:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

908:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

1775:This page follows NPOV because Knowledge relies on 1644:https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Homeopathy#page_npov 1117:will be deleted after seven days, as described in 691:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/March of Empires 192:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 813: 1836:. It does not mean what you think it means. -- 1119:section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion 1113:Note that any non-free images not used in any 837:section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion 8: 1672:Knowledge:Lunatic charlatans#Wales' response 1409:If you insist: he posited that on Knowledge 1084:Orphaned non-free image File:Bondremixed.jpg 439:I agree, Gladio Operations must be defeated. 1664:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bq-GuSs8kX8 1060:https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Urine_therapy 362:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpFEtvjjA6U 351:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alcKvmGfvh0 340:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ynx-xOsfbhk 329:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LslBNJ5Nvxg 269:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJR7Gek_V7k 154:redirect, you might want to participate in 102:redirect, you might want to participate in 290:This story is getting traction in the USA. 150:. Since you had some involvement with the 98:. Since you had some involvement with the 1638:another page - going down the rabbit hole 1058:lets look how long this one can last .. 1145:lets look if it will be allowed to stay 817:the guide to writing your first article 399:UKIP are fascists and must be stopped! 321: 1777:high quality medical secondary sources 921:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/PySol 849:what is generally accepted as notable 7: 1395:imho that is a bit of a strawman .. 1009:"Internet social network" listed at 739:2018 Arbitration Committee elections 622:2017 Arbitration Committee elections 549:2016 Arbitration Committee elections 473:2016 Arbitration Committee elections 1413:should be equal (equally valid) to 975:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 910:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 865:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 822:You may want to consider using the 260:I'm just saying the possibility of 1054:made a comment about urine therapy 723:ArbCom 2018 election voter message 606:ArbCom 2017 election voter message 158:if you have not already done so. 106:if you have not already done so. 14: 1365:Hmmm... no, I did not talk about 983:The article will be discussed at 919:The article will be discussed at 371:I agree, I think it is a plot to. 218:review the candidates' statements 1670:Not a closely guarded secret... 1029:. This discussion will occur at 1016: 961: 895: 728: 611: 538: 462: 773:and submit your choices on the 656:and submit your choices on the 1740: 947:04:38, 28 September 2020 (UTC) 736:Hello, Ebricca. Voting in the 696:If you're new to the process, 619:Hello, Ebricca. Voting in the 546:Hello, Ebricca. Voting in the 470:Hello, Ebricca. Voting in the 224:. For the Election committee, 194:Arbitration Committee election 185:ArbCom elections are now open! 76:deleted 14 July 2007 (UTC) .. 1: 1674:was published ten years ago. 1642:about the homeopathy page .. 1131:18:02, 15 February 2024 (UTC) 1108:our policy for non-free media 1049:21:01, 12 December 2022 (UTC) 789:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) 752:Knowledge arbitration process 635:Knowledge arbitration process 599:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 562:Knowledge arbitration process 523:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 486:Knowledge arbitration process 298:) 17:11, 23 March 2016 (UTC) 287:) 14:34, 23 March 2016 (UTC) 234:08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 845:criteria for speedy deletion 826:to help you create articles. 672:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) 22:Knowledge:Welcome, newcomers 1662:referenced source would be 718:11:37, 8 January 2018 (UTC) 583:and submit your choices on 507:and submit your choices on 220:and submit your choices on 1886: 1860:18:09, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1846:17:51, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1828:17:28, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1813:17:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1799:16:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1771:16:31, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1756:12:08, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1727:07:42, 31 March 2024 (UTC) 1712:18:16, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1698:16:58, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1684:13:47, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1659:11:55, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1632:07:16, 31 March 2024 (UTC) 1590:00:14, 31 March 2024 (UTC) 1514:21:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1499:20:38, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1481:I don't like the articles 1474:19:15, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1456:18:59, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1442:18:54, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1427:18:49, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1405:17:56, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1391:17:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1361:17:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1346:16:40, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1305:18:21, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1291:18:12, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1265:17:50, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1251:17:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1237:17:34, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1222:17:16, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1200:16:51, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1177:15:14, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1161:05:12, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 1078:20:49, 30 March 2024 (UTC) 781:MediaWiki message delivery 679:Deletion discussion about 664:MediaWiki message delivery 591:MediaWiki message delivery 581:the candidates' statements 505:the candidates' statements 449:17:07, 24 March 2016 (UTC) 435:20:03, 23 March 2016 (UTC) 412:19:39, 23 March 2016 (UTC) 395:19:25, 23 March 2016 (UTC) 381:19:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC) 312:19:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC) 226:MediaWiki message delivery 1088: 882:21:15, 4 April 2019 (UTC) 831:A tag has been placed on 262:state sponsored terrorism 179:18:35, 5 April 2015 (UTC) 127:18:35, 5 April 2015 (UTC) 48:00:14, Dec 6, 2003 (UTC) 40:12:18, 25 Nov 2003 (UTC) 1722: 1693: 1654: 1627: 1509: 1469: 1437: 1400: 1356: 1300: 1260: 1232: 1195: 1156: 1011:Redirects for discussion 1004:19:48, 30 May 2022 (UTC) 977:or whether it should be 912:or whether it should be 430: 134:Redirects for discussion 82:Redirects for discussion 62:14:45, 7 Dec 2003 (UTC) 1793:The Hand That Feeds You 1136:comment on wp critizism 1025:and has thus listed it 1023:Internet social network 302:Sadly, they deleted it! 156:the redirect discussion 104:the redirect discussion 1541: 1487:health effects of salt 1093: 870:deleting administrator 856:contest the nomination 828: 810: 300: 253:I saw it a replied- 248:2016_Brussels_bombings 143: 91: 29:Knowledge:Village pump 1540: 1096:Thanks for uploading 1091: 809: 748:Arbitration Committee 698:articles for deletion 631:Arbitration Committee 558:Arbitration Committee 531:ArbCom Elections 2016 482:Arbitration Committee 455:ArbCom Elections 2016 255: 246:originally posted on 198:Arbitration Committee 142: 90: 1576:It would be nice to 1275:moving the goalposts 1099:File:Bondremixed.jpg 24:and associated pages 1330:Knowledge is biased 1269:Creating life is a 242:false flag .. ? 2nd 202:arbitration process 54:list of game topics 1748: 1542: 1140:made a comment on 1094: 811: 764:arbitration policy 647:arbitration policy 574:arbitration policy 533:: Voting now open! 498:arbitration policy 457:: Voting now open! 214:arbitration policy 144: 92: 1739: 1381:to that effect). 1104:claim of fair use 860:visiting the page 841:credibly indicate 702:how to contribute 686:Hello, Ebricca, 177: 174:(Follow my trail) 132:Yatsee listed at 125: 122:(Follow my trail) 27:Ask questions on 1877: 1794: 1753: 1747: 1746: 1743: 1090: 1041: 1020: 1000: 970:March of Empires 965: 964: 954:March of Empires 943: 938: 933: 899: 898: 879: 872: 808: 732: 714: 681:March of Empires 615: 542: 466: 364: 359: 353: 348: 342: 337: 331: 326: 171: 169: 163: 119: 117: 111: 80:Yazee listed at 60:Charles Matthews 1885: 1884: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1792: 1784:personal attack 1751: 1744: 1741: 1640: 1377:which could be 1336:encyclopedias. 1279:God of the gaps 1138: 1121:. Thank you. -- 1086: 1056: 1035: 1014: 998: 994: 966: 962: 958: 941: 936: 931: 900: 896: 893: 875: 868: 833:Papillon S.r.l. 829: 806: 804: 801:Papillon S.r.l. 797:Speedy deletion 793: 792: 733: 725: 712: 684: 676: 675: 616: 608: 603: 602: 586:the voting page 543: 535: 527: 526: 510:the voting page 467: 459: 369: 368: 367: 360: 356: 349: 345: 338: 334: 327: 323: 244: 222:the voting page 188: 176: 167: 159: 137: 124: 115: 107: 85: 71: 12: 11: 5: 1883: 1881: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1830: 1787: 1780: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1661: 1648: 1646: 1639: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1619: 1618: 1617:misunderstood. 1613: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1479: 1462: 1461: 1326: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1187: 1180: 1179: 1149: 1146: 1144: 1137: 1134: 1085: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1055: 1052: 1027:for discussion 1013: 1007: 960: 959: 957: 952:Nomination of 950: 894: 892: 887:Nomination of 885: 824:Article Wizard 812: 803: 799:nomination of 794: 771:the candidates 734: 727: 726: 724: 721: 683: 677: 654:the candidates 617: 610: 609: 607: 604: 544: 537: 536: 534: 528: 468: 461: 460: 458: 452: 366: 365: 354: 343: 332: 320: 319: 315: 243: 240: 238: 191: 187: 182: 172: 136: 130: 120: 84: 78: 70: 67: 65: 51: 42: 32: 31: 25: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1882: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1829: 1825: 1821: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1797: 1795: 1788: 1785: 1781: 1778: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1754: 1749: 1736: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1665: 1660: 1656: 1652: 1647:comment text 1645: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1620: 1615: 1614: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1571: 1567: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1539: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1373:(one of many 1372: 1368: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1334:WP:MAINSTREAM 1331: 1327: 1324: 1323: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1188: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1143: 1135: 1133: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1111: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1100: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1061: 1053: 1051: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1040: 1039: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1019: 1012: 1008: 1006: 1005: 1002: 1001: 993: 989: 986: 980: 976: 972: 971: 955: 951: 949: 948: 945: 944: 939: 934: 925: 922: 917: 915: 911: 907: 906: 890: 886: 884: 883: 880: 878: 871: 866: 861: 857: 852: 850: 846: 842: 838: 834: 827: 825: 820: 818: 802: 798: 795: 791: 790: 786: 782: 778: 777: 772: 767: 765: 761: 757: 753: 749: 744: 741: 740: 731: 722: 720: 719: 716: 715: 708: 705: 703: 699: 694: 692: 687: 682: 678: 674: 673: 669: 665: 661: 660: 655: 650: 648: 644: 640: 636: 632: 627: 624: 623: 614: 605: 601: 600: 596: 592: 588: 587: 582: 577: 575: 571: 567: 563: 559: 554: 551: 550: 541: 532: 529: 525: 524: 520: 516: 512: 511: 506: 501: 499: 495: 491: 487: 483: 478: 475: 474: 465: 456: 453: 451: 450: 446: 442: 441:79.77.214.236 437: 436: 432: 428: 422: 418: 414: 413: 409: 405: 404:79.77.214.229 402: 397: 396: 392: 388: 387:79.77.214.229 383: 382: 378: 374: 373:79.77.214.229 363: 358: 355: 352: 347: 344: 341: 336: 333: 330: 325: 322: 318: 314: 313: 309: 305: 304:79.77.214.229 299: 297: 293: 292:79.77.214.229 288: 286: 282: 276: 275:collapsed .. 272: 270: 265: 263: 258: 254: 251: 249: 241: 239: 236: 235: 231: 227: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 199: 195: 186: 183: 181: 180: 175: 170: 162: 157: 153: 149: 141: 135: 131: 129: 128: 123: 118: 110: 105: 101: 97: 89: 83: 79: 77: 75: 74:Game of logic 69:Game of logic 68: 66: 63: 61: 57: 55: 49: 47: 41: 39: 35: 30: 26: 23: 19: 18: 17: 1855: 1820:AndyTheGrump 1808: 1790: 1766: 1641: 1366: 1139: 1114: 1112: 1097: 1095: 1057: 1037: 1036: 1015: 999:Lee Vilenski 996: 995: 990: 982: 968: 956:for deletion 929: 926: 918: 903: 901: 891:for deletion 877:CAPTAIN RAJU 876: 855: 853: 830: 821: 814: 774: 768: 745: 737: 735: 713:Lee Vilenski 710: 709: 706: 695: 688: 685: 657: 651: 628: 620: 618: 584: 578: 555: 547: 545: 508: 502: 479: 471: 469: 438: 423: 419: 415: 398: 384: 370: 357: 346: 335: 324: 316: 301: 289: 284: 277: 273: 266: 259: 256: 252: 245: 237: 189: 165: 160: 151: 145: 113: 108: 99: 93: 72: 64: 58: 50: 43: 36: 33: 15: 1838:Hob Gadling 1832:Also, read 1411:creationism 1271:red herring 776:voting page 659:voting page 34:Good Luck! 1834:ad hominem 1704:tgeorgescu 1676:tgeorgescu 1582:tgeorgescu 1491:tgeorgescu 1448:tgeorgescu 1419:tgeorgescu 1383:tgeorgescu 1338:tgeorgescu 1283:tgeorgescu 1243:tgeorgescu 1214:tgeorgescu 1169:tgeorgescu 1070:tgeorgescu 760:topic bans 643:topic bans 570:topic bans 494:topic bans 317:References 210:topic bans 38:Alexandros 1415:evolution 1038:Steel1943 756:site bans 639:site bans 566:site bans 490:site bans 206:site bans 168:Horrorist 116:Horrorist 1569:science. 1483:abortion 1379:WP:CITED 1115:articles 707:Thanks, 1852:Ebricca 1805:Ebricca 1763:Ebricca 1719:Ebricca 1690:Ebricca 1651:Ebricca 1624:Ebricca 1506:Ebricca 1466:Ebricca 1434:Ebricca 1397:Ebricca 1367:his own 1353:Ebricca 1297:Ebricca 1257:Ebricca 1229:Ebricca 1192:Ebricca 1153:Ebricca 979:deleted 914:deleted 515:Mdann52 427:Ebricca 281:Ebricca 20:Peruse 1752:(talk) 1742:Pepper 1277:, and 196:. The 164:, the 152:Yatsee 148:Yatsee 112:, the 1745:Beast 1375:WP:RS 1123:B-bot 937:Media 905:PySol 889:PySol 100:Yazee 96:Yazee 1856:talk 1842:talk 1824:talk 1809:talk 1767:talk 1723:talk 1708:talk 1694:talk 1680:talk 1655:talk 1628:talk 1586:talk 1578:know 1510:talk 1495:talk 1485:and 1470:talk 1452:talk 1438:talk 1423:talk 1401:talk 1387:talk 1357:talk 1342:talk 1301:talk 1287:talk 1261:talk 1247:talk 1233:talk 1218:talk 1196:talk 1173:talk 1157:talk 1127:talk 1074:talk 1045:talk 942:Kid! 932:Free 785:talk 746:The 668:talk 629:The 595:talk 556:The 519:talk 480:The 445:talk 431:talk 408:talk 391:talk 377:talk 308:talk 296:talk 285:talk 230:talk 166:Mad 161:Zeke 114:Mad 109:Zeke 46:Taku 1710:) 1682:) 1588:) 1497:) 1454:) 1425:) 1389:) 1344:) 1289:) 1249:) 1220:) 1175:) 1110:). 1076:) 873:. 858:by 851:. 693:. 271:.. 190:Hi, 1858:) 1844:) 1826:) 1811:) 1769:) 1725:) 1696:) 1657:) 1630:) 1512:) 1472:) 1440:) 1403:) 1359:) 1303:) 1281:. 1273:, 1263:) 1235:) 1198:) 1159:) 1129:) 1047:) 981:. 916:. 787:) 779:. 758:, 670:) 662:. 641:, 597:) 589:. 568:, 521:) 513:. 492:, 447:) 433:) 425:-- 410:) 393:) 379:) 310:) 279:-- 232:) 208:, 56:. 1854:( 1840:( 1822:( 1807:( 1796:: 1786:. 1765:( 1721:( 1706:( 1692:( 1678:( 1653:( 1626:( 1584:( 1508:( 1493:( 1468:( 1450:( 1436:( 1421:( 1399:( 1385:( 1355:( 1340:( 1299:( 1285:( 1259:( 1245:( 1231:( 1216:( 1194:( 1171:( 1155:( 1125:( 1092:⚠ 1072:( 1043:( 819:. 783:( 666:( 593:( 517:( 443:( 429:( 406:( 389:( 375:( 306:( 294:( 283:( 228:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index