Knowledge

User talk:Egmontaz/Archive 2

Source đź“ť

335: 160: 389: 250:, you can't tell even a day later if this is the same user with the last vandal. The case you mention is a school IP so even hours later it could be a different user. In the case of a registered user then my criteria are would be probably the same as yours (but as I said before, I usually don't do this manually, so it's huggle's decision). Regards! -- 509: 214:
I'm wondering what folks generally use as the duration of user notices like these. If I find vandalism on a page from a frequent vandal who nevertheless hasn't been warned in a few months, I usually don't give higher than a Level2. But within the same month or week, I tend to stay at their last
276:, which not only makes some things easier and faster but also makes it harder to see what I'm doing in advance. It's good, though, because it makes me much more careful and thoughtful about notices and reversions. Regards 50:
Thank you very much for informing me. I missed a vandalism there but hopefully another editor noticed it and reverted it. I also rollbacked the recent vandalism. You actually can do this yourself manually. Just view the
210:
when it immediately followed a Level4 from less than 18 hours earlier. "This is the final warning you will receive..." can't be too impressive if it's followed shortly by a "Welcome to Knowledge." Or do you disagree?
698:
Hi there Egmontaz, just letting you know I've approved Egmontbot's BRfA, so long as you're okay with it being exclusion compliant everything looks fine. Please see the
699: 692: 636:
I am having trouble rederecting users from my old talk page ( mydomainwiki100) to my new account's talk page ( mypersonalwiki100 ). Could you give me some advice? --
246:
most of the time, I only chose whether to warn or not and then the levels are autoselected by huggle. Anyway, my criteria (when I do this manually) are just the same
352: 301:
You are welcome! I also started with twinkle, I still use it sometimes in special cases. Get some experience in countervandalism and then I suggest you ask for
173: 607:
Good job though, you're not as slow as I recall you RCPs being. Tomorrow I plan use IP Ranges from: 71.114.0.55-71.114.2.92, you might want to note that down.
660: 445: 617: 35:
article. There appears to be multiple vandalism edits recently by an anonymous user. Would you consider performing a rollback? Thanks! --
564: 493: 477:
Thanks for cleaning up the Vandalism at the Antonio Salieri main article page! --Eric W. Cook 17:15, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Eric W. Cook
368: 123: 102: 55:, select the most recent not vandalized version, edit & save! If you need anything else that I can do please tell me! Regards!-- 455:
Thanks to you as well for doing this for me. Somehow your link on your talk page directed me to some other editor's talk page.
215:
warning's level or go up one. But I've seen different people apply different approaches, and it's not always clear. So what's
577: 656: 641: 419: 548:
What is your problem? I know that file is from bollywoodworld.com because I'm the Admin of that website damn it!!!
728: 283: 226: 441: 621: 207: 652: 637: 560: 489: 437: 404: 365: 341: 334: 279: 272:
Cool, thanks for your input! I haven't used huggle, so I don't know much about it. I just started using
222: 203: 127: 106: 648: 613: 552: 481: 119: 98: 723: 707: 460: 580:
and follow the instructions there. Knowledge's Copyright policy protects you too. Kind regards. --
302: 185: 166: 159: 143: 78: 40: 17: 672:
The only thing you have to do is replace everything in that page with #REDIRECT ]. Regards. --
556: 485: 360: 273: 388: 243: 219:
criteria for starting over? Thanks (answer, if you will, here or on my Talk, your choice).
525: 703: 456: 32: 673: 581: 306: 251: 181: 139: 74: 56: 36: 734: 711: 685: 664: 625: 593: 568: 532: 464: 450: 429: 374: 348: 318: 288: 263: 231: 189: 147: 131: 110: 82: 73:
Thanks! I had been wondering about the easiest way to perform a manual rollback. --
68: 44: 519: 576:
Hello. I'm not (nor anyone else) supposed to be aware of this. Please read
395:
Peppermint Chills Thanks you for removing vandalism from his User-page.
383: 355:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
333: 176:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
158: 95:
hi please dont block me my stupid sister keeps doing this
435:
Likewise, thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page.
52: 242:Well the truth is I didn't decide the level! I use 693:Knowledge:Bots/Requests for approval/Egmontbot 2 202:I'm wondering why you gave a Level1 warning to 31:I know you've patrolled and contributed to the 8: 340:Hello, Egmontaz. You have new messages at 165:Hello, Egmontaz. You have new messages at 305:and/or start using Huggle. Regards. -- 7: 721:Thanks for the vandal fighting ^_^ 195:Severity/duration of user warnings 24: 604:I will be back... That is all. 507: 387: 116:is it free to make an account 578:Knowledge:Copyright violations 1: 644:) 20:42, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 750: 735:14:55, 29 April 2010 (UTC) 712:14:13, 29 April 2010 (UTC) 686:07:39, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 665:20:42, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 626:13:53, 11 April 2010 (UTC) 594:12:53, 11 April 2010 (UTC) 569:12:48, 11 April 2010 (UTC) 533:21:14, 10 April 2010 (UTC) 465:05:13, 13 April 2010 (UTC) 451:20:26, 15 March 2010 (UTC) 430:15:50, 15 March 2010 (UTC) 375:23:29, 11 March 2010 (UTC) 349:23:29, 11 March 2010 (UTC) 319:08:33, 11 March 2010 (UTC) 289:08:20, 11 March 2010 (UTC) 264:08:10, 11 March 2010 (UTC) 232:07:28, 11 March 2010 (UTC) 190:19:44, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 148:19:32, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 132:19:00, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 111:18:56, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 83:16:38, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 69:14:12, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 45:13:59, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 342:Apparition11's talk page 237:Hello JohnFromPinckney! 338: 163: 702:for details. Best, - 337: 162: 167:Zhang He's talk page 600:Greetings Egmontaz! 541:bollywoodworld.com 353:remove this notice 339: 204:User:168.8.143.236 174:remove this notice 164: 18:User talk:Egmontaz 668: 653:MyPersonalWiki100 651:comment added by 638:MyPersonalWiki100 616:comment added by 572: 555:comment added by 531: 498: 484:comment added by 400: 399: 122:comment added by 101:comment added by 741: 731: 726: 681: 677: 667: 645: 628: 589: 585: 571: 549: 530: 528: 517: 515: 511: 510: 497: 478: 449: 425: 422: 413: 410: 407: 391: 384: 373: 371: 363: 356: 314: 310: 280:JohnFromPinckney 259: 255: 223:JohnFromPinckney 199:Hello, Egmontaz 177: 134: 113: 64: 60: 27:Rollback request 749: 748: 744: 743: 742: 740: 739: 738: 729: 724: 719: 696: 679: 675: 646: 634: 611: 602: 587: 583: 550: 543: 526: 518: 508: 506: 504: 479: 475: 438:Mephistophelian 436: 423: 420: 411: 408: 405: 382: 369: 361: 359: 357: 346: 331: 312: 308: 257: 253: 197: 178: 171: 156: 117: 96: 93: 62: 58: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 747: 745: 725:Captain n00dle 718: 715: 695: 690: 689: 688: 633: 630: 618:124.148.194.43 601: 598: 597: 596: 542: 539: 537: 503: 500: 474: 471: 470: 469: 468: 467: 457:Adrenalin 150% 398: 397: 392: 381: 378: 347:Message added 345: 332: 330: 327: 326: 325: 324: 323: 322: 321: 294: 293: 292: 291: 267: 266: 239: 238: 196: 193: 170: 157: 155: 152: 151: 150: 138:Yes, it is. - 92: 89: 88: 87: 86: 85: 33:literary genre 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 746: 737: 736: 733: 732: 727: 716: 714: 713: 709: 705: 701: 694: 691: 687: 684: 682: 678: 671: 670: 669: 666: 662: 658: 654: 650: 643: 639: 631: 629: 627: 623: 619: 615: 608: 605: 599: 595: 592: 590: 586: 579: 575: 574: 573: 570: 566: 562: 558: 554: 546: 540: 538: 535: 534: 529: 523: 522: 514: 501: 499: 495: 491: 487: 483: 472: 466: 462: 458: 454: 453: 452: 447: 446:contributions 443: 439: 434: 433: 432: 431: 428: 427: 426: 416: 415: 414: 396: 393: 390: 386: 385: 379: 377: 376: 372: 366: 364: 354: 350: 343: 336: 328: 320: 317: 315: 311: 304: 300: 299: 298: 297: 296: 295: 290: 287: 285: 281: 275: 271: 270: 269: 268: 265: 262: 260: 256: 249: 245: 241: 240: 236: 235: 234: 233: 230: 228: 224: 218: 212: 209: 205: 200: 194: 192: 191: 187: 183: 175: 168: 161: 153: 149: 145: 141: 137: 136: 135: 133: 129: 125: 121: 114: 112: 108: 104: 100: 90: 84: 80: 76: 72: 71: 70: 67: 65: 61: 54: 49: 48: 47: 46: 42: 38: 34: 26: 19: 722: 720: 700:request page 697: 683: 674: 635: 632:I need help! 609: 606: 603: 591: 582: 557:Arjunr240576 547: 545:Mr.Egmontaz 544: 536: 520: 512: 505: 502:.en Rollback 486:Eric W. Cook 476: 418: 417: 403: 402: 401: 394: 358: 316: 307: 277: 261: 252: 247: 220: 216: 213: 201: 198: 179: 115: 94: 66: 57: 53:page history 30: 647:—Preceding 612:—Preceding 551:—Preceding 516:of course. 480:—Preceding 124:173.58.71.8 118:—Preceding 103:173.58.71.8 97:—Preceding 362:Apparition 351:. You can 91:No heading 208:Talk page 154:Talkback. 676:Egmontaz 661:contribs 649:unsigned 614:unsigned 584:Egmontaz 565:contribs 553:unsigned 494:contribs 482:unsigned 370:Mistakes 329:Talkback 309:Egmontaz 303:rollback 254:Egmontaz 182:Zhang He 172:You can 140:Zhang He 120:unsigned 99:unsigned 75:Junius49 59:Egmontaz 37:Junius49 704:Kingpin 610:Enjoy. 274:Twinkle 248:for IPs 206:on hir 717:Thanks 473:Thanks 380:Thanks 244:huggle 527:Chat 521:Pedro 16:< 708:talk 657:talk 642:talk 622:talk 561:talk 513:Done 490:talk 461:talk 442:talk 412:mint 284:talk 227:talk 217:your 186:talk 144:talk 128:talk 107:talk 79:talk 41:talk 424:lls 421:Chi 409:per 406:Pep 710:) 663:) 659:• 624:) 567:) 563:• 524:: 496:) 492:• 463:) 444:● 278:— 221:— 188:) 180:- 146:) 130:) 109:) 81:) 43:) 730:\ 706:( 680:♤ 655:( 640:( 620:( 588:♤ 559:( 488:( 459:( 448:) 440:( 367:/ 344:. 313:♤ 286:) 282:( 258:♤ 229:) 225:( 184:( 169:. 142:( 126:( 105:( 77:( 63:♤ 39:(

Index

User talk:Egmontaz
literary genre
Junius49
talk
13:59, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
page history
Egmontaz♤
14:12, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Junius49
talk
16:38, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
unsigned
173.58.71.8
talk
18:56, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
unsigned
173.58.71.8
talk
19:00, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Zhang He
talk
19:32, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Zhang He's talk page
remove this notice
Zhang He
talk
19:44, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
User:168.8.143.236
Talk page

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑