42:
597:
439:
526:
375:
The article states that a Feudal barony of Cromar existed attached to Migvie Castle. But, during the time of Migvie Castle's existence and since the area and authority was never referred to as a barony or its holders as barons in historical documents. The Earls of Mar held it as a
Lordship, but were
228:
Hi guys sorry if these edits have seemed belligerent I'm not sure how to change the
Wikiloop message and didn't meant to accuse of "vandalism"-- as to Espresso addict I didn't see the value in removing the deletion nomination so undid it (please advise), and as to you Daniel I went and checked the
329:
Hi no worrries about being curt I deserved it a bit! Apologies again on the accidental vandalism accusation, to be fully honest with you I forgot that's included in the
Wikiloop message and meant no offense by it. This was really an example of my lack of experience showing-- prior to this moment I
392:
If someone has used the "technical" definition to say that lordships can be looked on as baronies, and so substantiates it as a commercial commodity and thing to be owned and enjoyed in recent years, that seems reasonable given the law clearly allows it. But if so I would suggest that ought to be
312:
PS Sorry about being rather curt above. I can't remember when anyone last accused me of vandalism! I'd be very careful using that tool; looking at the
Mediawiki documentation page for it there appears to be quite a high rate of reported errors and it pays no heed to the experience of the editor
366:
First, as a genuine question. When deprodding a deletion, are you not expected to explain why you have deprodded it? Excuse my asking such a naive question, it is for my understanding. As it is you seem to have only asked that the thing/s mentioned as being lacking by the deletion request are
388:
This wikipedia page is being propagated autoatically and manually across the internet and no doubt is being included in people's thinking and research. The risk is the historical significance and nature of this ancient authority and dignity and the area itself becomes lost or
66:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
313:(unlike most of the vandalism tools). Also, on the wikipolitics front, removing or declining prod tags is a game that is mainly played by highly experienced editors, and inadvertently accusing them of vandalism is likely to cause offence. Cheers,
379:
This PHD Thesis explores the administrative structures of the area in detail during that period. It refers to a number of
Baronies and a number of Lordships. It lists Cromar as a Lordship and provides its historical evidence in charters in that
261:
Haha no worries-- had a laugh when I was going through on the ISBN search and it said "pictorial" everywhere, thought I was going crazy. Also have realized how to edit
Wikiloop message. Have you re(!) reverted the edit or should I?
330:
hadn't fully realized the difference between
Proposed Deletion and an AfD and thought it was a situation with some editor trying to circumvent a AfD discussion, I realize my mistake now. Will tread more lightly in the future!!
288:. Any editor may contest any proposed deletion for any reason or none. This cannot be undone, and if the proposer (or anyone else) still wishes to delete the article then it must be discussed at AfD. Also, I'm an
70:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
642:
484:
399:
I hope this makes sense, and appreciate your taking time to consider it. If I have added it in the wrong place, or it is couched in the wrong terms I would welcome your advice as to how to improve it.
626:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
468:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
247:
You are right about the
Guildford source. I should have enlarged the image and checked more carefully. Anyway, if you can find a way to change the edit summaries then that would be good.
611:
453:
344:
Ah, I see, that makes sense! There's an enormous difference between speedies, prods and AfDs, and a lot of complicated rules about when and by whom they can be removed. Cheers,
367:
addressed. Perhaps it is normal to deprod on that basis - but it doesn't seem to progress things too much. The article itself has already asked for that for quite some time.
547:. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
376:
never referred to as Barons. The cited book in the bibliography makes no mention of such a thing either, although it is entirely focused on the area of Cromar.
543:, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Knowledge with an
396:
Historical information and subtleties of ancient tenure are complex enough without overwriting history. It will be a great shame if history is obscured.
152:
53:
63:
567:
148:
665:
507:
393:
done with an explanation as to that rationale and what it represents truly rather than implying it has had genuine historical usage.
571:
540:
661:
503:
635:
477:
647:
489:
285:
383:
574:, would be interested in hearing your input. Apologies for forgetting an edit summary, I appreciate the reminder
350:
319:
298:
191:
57:
289:
413:
179:
623:
465:
252:
211:
409:
345:
314:
293:
225:
186:
142:
133:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
605:
556:
548:
544:
447:
168:
654:
619:
496:
461:
248:
221:
207:
80:
634:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
476:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
575:
331:
263:
234:
233:
seem to say "pictorial" in the book title so was very confused by your edit and reverted.
114:
95:
17:
145:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.
631:
473:
185:
Hello
Eggventura -- Please don't revert deprodding edits as vandalism -- they are not.
627:
469:
159:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
552:
530:
164:
160:
596:
438:
384:
https://dspace.stir.ac.uk/bitstream/1893/25815/1/PHD%20THESIS%20FINAL%202017.pdf
134:
76:
202:
I'm not sure what part WikiLoop DoubleCheck plays in this but your revert of
669:
638:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
583:
560:
511:
480:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
417:
355:
339:
324:
303:
271:
256:
242:
215:
196:
172:
122:
107:
84:
25:
615:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
457:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
138:
48:
32:
206:
was also way off the mark. Is this some sort of bot malfunction? --
292:; considering proposed deletions is part of the job description.
651:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
493:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
402:
I am also happy to lsiten to counter arguments if any are posed.
641:
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
609:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All
483:
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
451:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All
622:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
535:
464:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
203:
137:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
46:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
52:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
129:Disambiguation link notification for October 14
370:To try to explain the rationale for deletion.
8:
566:Hi I left an explanation/discussion on the
64:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Ulucami
7:
606:2023 Arbitration Committee elections
448:2022 Arbitration Committee elections
590:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
432:ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
363:I notice you deprodded my deletion.
54:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
14:
94:i hit the wrong button sorry lol
62:The article will be discussed at
595:
572:Hands Across the Aisle Coalition
541:Hands Across the Aisle Coalition
524:
437:
40:
645:and submit your choices on the
487:and submit your choices on the
1:
670:01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
624:Knowledge arbitration process
512:01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
466:Knowledge arbitration process
85:23:26, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
584:02:21, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
561:02:02, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
418:15:21, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
356:02:31, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
340:01:58, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
325:01:52, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
304:01:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
272:01:52, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
257:01:36, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
243:01:24, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
216:01:18, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
197:01:10, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
173:05:59, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
123:03:59, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
108:03:57, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
688:
662:MediaWiki message delivery
504:MediaWiki message delivery
16:Welcome to my talk page!
659:to your user talk page.
579:
501:to your user talk page.
335:
267:
238:
118:
56:or whether it should be
26:21:00, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
21:
180:Feudal barony of Cromar
620:Arbitration Committee
603:Hello! Voting in the
462:Arbitration Committee
445:Hello! Voting in the
533:. I noticed that in
286:WP:Proposed deletion
204:my edit to Guildford
161:opt-out instructions
360:Hi Espresso Addict.
636:arbitration policy
478:arbitration policy
151:• Join us at the
672:
514:
354:
323:
302:
195:
156:
143:usually incorrect
141:. Such links are
679:
660:
658:
599:
538:
528:
527:
502:
500:
441:
348:
317:
296:
189:
146:
113:haha no worries
105:
100:
44:
43:
687:
686:
682:
681:
680:
678:
677:
676:
675:
674:
652:
600:
592:
534:
525:
522:
517:
516:
494:
442:
434:
346:Espresso Addict
315:Espresso Addict
294:Espresso Addict
226:Espresso Addict
187:Espresso Addict
183:
153:DPL WikiProject
131:
101:
96:
92:
73:
45:
41:
37:
12:
11:
5:
685:
683:
643:the candidates
612:eligible users
601:
594:
593:
591:
588:
587:
586:
521:
518:
485:the candidates
454:eligible users
443:
436:
435:
433:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
406:
403:
400:
397:
394:
390:
386:
381:
377:
373:
371:
368:
364:
361:
307:
306:
281:
280:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
274:
182:
178:Deprodding of
176:
130:
127:
126:
125:
91:
88:
39:
38:
36:
31:Nomination of
29:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
684:
673:
671:
667:
663:
656:
650:
649:
644:
639:
637:
633:
629:
625:
621:
616:
614:
613:
608:
607:
598:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
564:
563:
562:
558:
554:
551:. Thank you.
550:
546:
542:
537:
532:
519:
515:
513:
509:
505:
498:
492:
491:
486:
481:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
458:
456:
455:
450:
449:
440:
431:
419:
415:
411:
407:
404:
401:
398:
395:
391:
387:
385:
382:
378:
374:
372:
369:
365:
362:
359:
358:
357:
352:
347:
343:
342:
341:
337:
333:
328:
327:
326:
321:
316:
311:
310:
309:
308:
305:
300:
295:
291:
290:administrator
287:
283:
282:
273:
269:
265:
260:
259:
258:
254:
250:
246:
245:
244:
240:
236:
232:
227:
223:
219:
218:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
200:
199:
198:
193:
188:
181:
177:
175:
174:
170:
166:
162:
157:
154:
150:
144:
140:
136:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
111:
110:
109:
106:
104:
99:
89:
87:
86:
82:
78:
72:
68:
65:
59:
55:
51:
50:
34:
30:
28:
27:
23:
19:
646:
640:
617:
610:
604:
602:
549:my talk page
545:edit summary
523:
520:January 2023
488:
482:
459:
452:
446:
444:
410:Aardnavarkin
408:Aardnavaxin
284:Please read
230:
229:ISBN and it
184:
158:
132:
102:
97:
93:
90:October 2022
74:
69:
61:
47:
35:for deletion
15:
648:voting page
529:Hello, I'm
490:voting page
249:DanielRigal
222:DanielRigal
208:DanielRigal
135:Chen Halevi
632:topic bans
576:Eggventura
474:topic bans
332:Eggventura
264:Eggventura
235:Eggventura
163:. Thanks,
147:(Read the
115:Eggventura
18:Eggventura
628:site bans
568:talk page
536:this edit
470:site bans
389:confused.
570:for the
655:NoACEMM
553:Adakiko
531:Adakiko
497:NoACEMM
165:DPL bot
139:Israeli
98:Liliana
58:deleted
49:Ulucami
33:Ulucami
405:Thanks
380:light.
77:Bejnar
666:talk
618:The
580:talk
557:talk
508:talk
460:The
414:talk
351:talk
336:talk
320:talk
299:talk
268:talk
253:talk
239:talk
231:does
212:talk
192:talk
169:talk
119:talk
81:talk
22:talk
539:to
149:FAQ
103:UwU
668:)
657:}}
653:{{
630:,
582:)
559:)
510:)
499:}}
495:{{
472:,
416:)
338:)
270:)
255:)
241:)
214:)
171:)
155:.)
121:)
83:)
75:--
60:.
24:)
664:(
578:(
555:(
506:(
412:(
353:)
349:(
334:(
322:)
318:(
301:)
297:(
266:(
251:(
237:(
224:@
220:@
210:(
194:)
190:(
167:(
117:(
79:(
20:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.