914:, etc.). Had I been left alone, then I wouldn't have had to make this appeal. It's clear most of the oppose users are people that have known Me in the past. It's clear to Me can't change their minds but I wish they'd stop looking at Me as a gangster that who likes to drive people crazy and start looking at Me like a human being. I'll be happy to discuss any recent activity but You can't assume everything You suspect is true. If You'd ask, "Eddie does Account X belong to You" and I say "No", You'd prolly insist I'm lying and that I really own it anyway. Therefore we need to draw a line between what I actually did and what You believe I did. This is especially important because if I am unblocked and during the probation period You suspect that another account is Mine, You'll assume it actually is and I'll be back here singing the blues. I'm happy that I finally have an opportunity to try and convince the community — as a whole — that I'm not the person I used to be. I can't let it slip up because of some suspicion that I can't clear up. I know I'll have a short leash for the first few months but I want to make it clear that I am trying to come back so I can drive people crazy. I'm trying to come back so I can have something productive to do with My time. Yes, I've had a shaky past, but it doesn't mean I can't change right now.
822:
originally checked the NYD account told me that if it was you, you'd learned to cover your tracks very well. So I'm quite sure you've been very carefully segregating your accounts. I don't want to oppose your return to
Knowledge (XXG) and I would actually like to see you given another chance but I'm going to have to oppose this request unless you put your cards on the table and identify the accounts you've been using so they can be blocked (after all, you won't need them anymore, right?). You told me that you couldn't help yourself when it came to Knowledge (XXG), that you were addicted to the site and couldn't stop editing, so I don't believe for a second that you haven't been editing over the last year and don't have any socks at present and I'm extremely disappointed that you are trying to side-step being honest with the community. Surely after being banned for all this time and finally having a realistic opportunity to be allowed to return legitimately, it is worth being honest and transparent? Please answer these questions: have you been editing over the last 6 months? What unblocked accounts do you have access to? Thanks.
247:
periodically, at least for the next little bit. Based on my experience here, if you want to contribute more to this project, one option is to start over from another account, and preferably one that would distance itself from the terminology you wanted to introduce to
Knowledge (XXG). Up to this point, it simply has not been substantiated to an encyclopedic level which satisfies the community at large. Perhaps you have a differing opinion on the matter, and perhaps the system may be blind towards your wisdom. However, the negative associations with that word have been exacerbated now, and I imagine it to be rather difficult to overturn that sentiment at large.
3327:
1289:". Aside from the fast the account was new, there is no other way to prove it belongs to Me at all. You wrote to Me You'd like the account You suspect I'm using to be blocked. Instead, let's discuss by email why Your suspected account is Mine. After all when You confronted Me back in 2007 with the NYD account you suspect based on "writing style" so I don't want You linking Me to someone else based solely on suggestive behaviour and I'd hate to add another user to the long list of suspected "socks" — some of which I know are not Mine.
220:. I'm assuming the IP address is yours. Yes, I can see that Bunchofgrapes was the nominator for that article, and was also involved with your recent indefinite block. Perhaps from your perspective, that particular pair of actions appears to be "unfair" or "unethical". I don't know how to change this perspective to alleviate the problem, other than to lift the original block, and replace it with an identical one of my own. At the moment, this seems to be the most reasonable thing to do. Now, there is some discussion about it
1011:
no way to resolve it without making more accounts. Like I said above, emails to the arbcom were not answered and I felt I was being ignored. I feel appalled that people like You could entertain thoughts of Me making plans to go back to My old self and (secretly) make hundreds of accounts. I still don't know who exactly You're trying to hang My face on and why You believe these belong to Me. I am going to contact ArbCom and have them decide whether or not it this should be handled on WP:RFAR or not.
2889:
3239:
3232:
571:). The reason is that I want this to be discussed in a way so that I can come back under limited conditions that everybody agrees on. I know I still have some opponents who would never trust Me ever a bit and would not want to see Me return, but I don't think a permanent injunction from editing makes sense because I tried to recreate a rejected article numerous times. After all, what usually happens to such a page? It is blacklisted. The article title "
3253:
2441:
3419:
3106:
2817:
2580:
2405:
2289:
2233:
2527:
3160:
2980:
2744:
3261:
2637:
3365:
3246:
73:
802:) do a WHOIS on the IP the account edited on, it might beling to public computer (such as a library or internet cafe) Also I need a time frame as to whether or not the "other account" logged in immediately after EddieSegoure. If there is a substantial amount of time between the edits then I probably have nothing to do with the other editor and the only connection is the IP itself.
65:
59:
51:
1325:, would welcome your comments (please take this as a direct invitation for you to address my concerns, though you are not obliged to obviously). You may wish to make other comments for the community to consider at the ban appeal too which this section may be helpful for, so hopefully someone will arrange to transclude this section of your talk page there soon.
3123:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see
2836:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see
2599:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see
2308:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see
2252:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see
3517:
2940:
2346:
662:
1374:. While no ban was explicitly proposed, I was initially indeffed by an involved admin who I've apologized to in the past. I have no intent of attempting to post the neologism in the future. 2. consensus can change over the years and the editors who knew me back in 2006 and 2009 when an appeal was made on my behalf are probably no longer active.
992:"I've tried many times to come back with a new account as a good standing user...Had I been left alone, then I wouldn't have had to make this appeal." - So in other words, the problem isn't with you or your behaviour and actions but rather with the editors who identified and reported your sockpuppets and the administrators who blocked them?
1873:
understand that if I engage in this behaviour then I'll be blocked again and never be able to edit with My name. I could easily be editing with the sock puppets that I have disclosed, but I made a serious effort to get My name off the banlist because I regret My past behaviour and intend to edit
Knowledge (XXG) seriously and responsibly.
940:
considering the nature of comments like my own. If you want to build an encyclopedia, you can/could have through actually changing your behavior. If you had done so, your socks would not have been found. Persistence in trying to overturn a community ban after have continued disruptive behavior will never be favorable to an unban.
2448:
1196:- Made a few edits, but after the block of NYD I felt it was much safer to edit anon since their is no point in making further accounts only to have them blocked. I obviously am going to have to check edit histories and articles but if You feel any edits from these IPs raise any red flags, feel free to ask any questions.
253:
meantime, it would probably be a healthy thing to refrain from editing a little bit. Some of your actions today have upset a number of things, and it is in your interest to wait a little bit longer so that more people would be willing to listen and attend to your concerns. We'll see how things unfold. I hope this helps. --
324:), and the CheckUser evidence is hard to disprove. You will not be unblocked, at least not in the near future. Perhaps you might like to try in a month, but not in a few days. Also, please stop editing from IPs, otherwise your unblock request in the future may be compromised by accusations of block evasion.
523:
for trying to recreate an articdle about a word I coined, I soon gave up trying to repost it. As for the recent incidents, that was not Me (I cannot prove it, but I can tell You I don't edit wikiquote or wikinews, and the deleted content contained a lot of vulgar language, and simply don't talk that
1123:
to close the discussion on WP:AN. Just because it ended up at the top of the page and the vote tally is about 50/50 (and I am including the ones before Sarahs comments) that doesn't mean it should be closed. I call on the ArbCom to make a decision as to whether I should have them deal with this by
1010:
Re, I am writing about the discussion back in 2006, the original discussion makes no initial proposal for banning, just a block. Since the policy clearely distinguishes the two, I felt the original block (and protecting of my talk page) was too extreme. The protection especially hurt because I had
939:
A community ban, while insulting in nature of its title, is not reflection of you as a person. It means that you (personally, as oppossed to a block) don't belong here. We don't get along with you, you don't get along with us. You still don't now. I can't see why you'd want to return to the site
835:
that were tagged there are a couple that I know don't belong to Me. Some don't even have edits. Frankly, I kinda wonder how You managed to find out about My NYD account. I would prefer we discussed by Email, because I need to know who and why You're targeting some editor and why You suspect Me of
737:
As for my run-ins with bunchofgrapes, I decided to email an apology to him and he accepted it (I don't know if I still have his response, but we haven't had any contacted ever since and He hasn't edited actively). So if I'm banned for harassment, then the issue itself is resolved in respect to that
730:
my article for deletion. Everything I did after that was out of frustration. But a couple of months after the block, I finally let it go. I felt that if the word has become so infamous and rejected their is no reason to further waist My time. That was then. I doubt that I would make any further
196:
As the first user who originally confronted Eddie, and asked him many times to stop what he was doing, I support this block. Eddie has had many chances to reform, and instead has deliberately chosen to disrupt
Knowledge (XXG) instead of becoming a valuable contributor to rail-related articles. I'm
1394:
As for the public statement I would like to add that the reason I was banned back in 2006 was for promoting and persistantly trying to create an article a non-existant word ("Exicornt", which is blacklisted off
Knowledge (XXG)) and disruption on Wiktionary. I haven't edited Wiktionary in years and
1378:
BASC has received your appeal and thinks the best route forward is for us to put it to the community. This would be along the lines of the 2009 appeal, which we facilitated for you. With that in mind, have you anything you wish to add to the above so it can be used as your public statement? Once we
2901:
Follow the
Wikimedia LGBT user group on Twitter at @wikilgbt for news, photos, and other topics of interest to LGBT Wikipedans and allies. Use #wikiLGBT to share any Wiki Loves Pride stuff that you would like to share (whether this month or any day of the year) or to alert folks to things that the
1909:
Eddie, I'm going to be blunt here to clear something up given I'm probably going to be the one assessing the consensus. It doesn't matter what you are willing to accept, the community is discussing it's conditions for allowing you to return. If you don't accept them, you don't get unbanned (or get
1039:
The account didn't need to be disruptive, however. You were editing while under a community ban and thus under the block and ban policies the account could be blocked. Whether the blocking administrator has had problems in other areas is not really relevant and I don't think it serves your case to
1001:
It's the way it was handled in the first place. I can not deny My past action was wrong and yes I understand spamming and harassment are serious. But Going back to the 2006 discussion, I feel I was blocked prematurely. I never had a chance to state My case. I was blocked only minutes after the
265:
I'm not sure what sort of resolution you wish to achieve - do you simply want to continue editing from your old account? As far as I'm concerned, that shouldn't be a problem. However, especially after today, I don't think the community is quite as open to trusting you just yet. My suggestion is to
2656:
no references to support this as a topic in need of an independent article. Are we to expect a similar article for every pairing of teams? This article currently exists only to list when the teams play each other, something that can be done much better by a single article listing all of the games
975:
The fact that their are people who support My return means that not everyone agree that I should never come back, there were few people I didn't get along with but most of the time there wasn't a problem. In fact, some are not around today. The few that do know Me have commented, and not all of
367:
Eddie: No. Stop being silly. I haven't made the decision to block you alone by any means, as you know. This isn't about rivalry, or a content dispute, and if you genuinely don't understand that, I'm sorry. Finally, threatening continuing vandalization if we don't unblock you is not a negotiation
1565:
I stated in My letter to BASC above that I was banned for bothering people on wiktionary. If I didn't apologise to them then, I apologise to them now (though it's prolly too late for that now and the users won't accept any apologies, if you can email a list of names to those who have the battle
1481:
and I was indeffed before I had a chance to address any concerns in that discussion. The sockuppetry happened because I was frustrated with the editors trying to keep Me away from the site. I thought to Myself that to probably over 90% of the editors that edit just articles would not mind if I
1099:
I think I can answer part of this question for you: the other account that tried to appeal on your behalf had no other edits aside from the appeal. I, on the other hand, have a sizable amount of edits, and my edits do not resemble your editing style in a way that would closely link my account to
886:
I don't really see any benefit in you answering my questions off-site. These are reasonable questions which the community deserves honest answers to. It should be straightforward to answer those two questions - either you have been editing over the last six months or you haven't, either you have
821:
Yes, we could do that, or you could simply quit playing games, put your cards on the table and be honest. I am sure that you are right and the IP of your socks resolves to a public computer - you told me you didn't want to use New York Dreams to edit from your home computer and the checkuser who
246:
At the moment, what I can do for you is the following: I will keep this page on my watchlist for a little bit, so if you wish to respond to this, you are more than welcome to. I can't guarantee that I will respond immediately since I have other priorities to attend to, but I will visit this page
1274:
No, it's never even occurred to me that you might be Doug. Instead of guessing what I think or suspect, why not just come clean and be honest? I quite like you as a person and I would support giving you a second chance if you were open, honest and transparent and stopped being evasive, and were
252:
If you do choose to make another account, it would be quite possible for other administrators to detect this, and based on current policy, I imagine there would be an inclination to block any additional accounts you might make. Should and when that happen, we'll talk more about it then. In the
932:
Your activities have not been destructive, but they have been disruptive. For years. Your alternate accounts have not been hunted down as you imply on this page (particularly your response to Sarah), but I am a firm believer that a tiger can't change its stripes. I am not making a personal
1872:
Judging from all the feedback, I think I might have that 2nd chance. Only four editors have opposed the appeal. I have to assume the opposition is out of concern that I'll eventually relapse into edit warring, harassment and sockpuppetry. I am pledging now to refrain from this activity. I
1579:
I'm not surprised in the least by Sarah opposing (the proven sock stuff was from 2005-2009, and Sarah obviously took it very personally). I really want to have nothing further to do with Sarah and I'm sorry for the trouble I caused her. I have a feeling that She probably suspects a current
1135:
is retracting his support and there are still people who are entertaining thoughts that I plans to create and use more account do what got Me into this to begin with. That being said, and given the fact that the ArbCom is privyy to checking IPs I am making a request to check the following:
2992:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before
Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1284:
The point is that You might be suspecting someone in good standing but it might not belong to Me at all. If You were indeed suspecting that name and I said "no" You'd oppose My return and tell the community I'm lying, just as ex-Admin
Ryulong suspected Malmindsir using the so-called
1062:
and the Power Ranger accounts). Can you please address this and explain why
Voltron and NYD should be considered examples of good faith attempts to become a user in good standing when it appears you were simply segregating your edits and causing disruption with other accounts. Thanks.
297:
Yes, I would like to be able to edit using this username. While I don't edit often, I doubt trying to post a word that's hated by another user merits being blocked indefinately by that very same user. However, I will wait a few days before I tag here with an {{unblock}} request. --
3172:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before
Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1482:
edited Myself. Therefore I never respected this. I'm just trying to come back and be Myself. But if You still feel I should not be editing anymore, or if You feel I'm still socking and harassing other editors now, then really I would like to have nothing to do with You.
412:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on
3081:
If by chance the file is deleted before either the draft is approved or you are able to find another policy-compliant use for it, then don't panic. Deleted files aren't gone forever, but rather are only hidden from public view and can be restored at a later date per
1006:
that the account wasn't disruptive. After that I wrote to You and after You told Me You could not help Me further I created NYD. I don't know how who told You I had that name, but trying to convince You that I don't have hundreds unblocked unused accounts won't be
1450:) as Mine. I used this account to post baseball schedules and upload logos, things You can't do as an anon user. WBF was never blocked and I have not used it in months. This account's last edit was in August 2014 in which I uploaded and cited a World Series logo
197:
sorry Eddie, I wish things had turned out differently, but these choices belong to you and you alone, and you have chosen to be a vandal instead of a Wikipedian. I hope in the future you will decide to truly change your ways. Until that time, take care. —
241:. I would characterize this sort of behaviour as somewhat chronic (considering the AfD was months ago), and unfortunately, your recent use of Knowledge (XXG)'s resources inclines on the side which does not support the case for you to be unblocked readily.
1476:
To be honest with you, I have never considered the ban on My username as a legitimate one. Bans handed down by the ArbCom are more legitimate because at least those editors that got banned were given due process. In My case, someone wrote about Me on
1044:
arguments. No one told me you were using the NYD account. I simply noticed the account on my watchlist, felt something was "not right" about it, looked at their contributions and recognised your writing style. Same goes with the Power Ranger accounts.
2756:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
575:" is blacklisted (i.e. protected indefinitely from creation) and only an admin can create an article with that name. Therefore -- issues aside -- I can assure You that I won't return as the person I was in 2006. I hope everyone understands that.
3062:. The file has been previously removed a number of times, but perhaps you didn't notice the edit summmarys left explaining why. Please don't re-add this file to the draft again until after the draft has been approved as an article. If as it seems
1591:
I see the appeal process is going well so far as I have mostly positive support. However I also understand that all editors that participated in the failed 2009 appeal have been notified and may still be inclined to oppose. I would like it if
2553:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
1898:
I am willing to agree with the one account restriction (I'd prefer a timeframe up to a year, but if consensus is indef, I'll take it). I'll also agree to the proposed topic bans which entail not being allowed to edit rail-related articles.
1002:
discussion was started. What about Voltron? Were their any annoying incedents when I used that account? The blocking user (I don't want to even mention His name, because He Himself has history of questionable actions) had to admit in an
1251:
edited RFAs and talk pages, and Sarah may have believed that I was using this account all along and felt betrayed stating I might have a many more secret accounts waiting to edit evasively. I will make it clear that this account does
887:
currently active socks or you don't. I think the community deserves an honest and straightforward answer here on this page or your request should be declined. I found the NYD account by recognising your writing style - simple as that.
167:
that blocked me has caused me a lot of suffering on this site. We had a fight over a word that he nominated for deletion months ago. He hates the word so much that he suggested that any mention or inclusion of this word be consider
1058:(after ec) Also, you cite Voltron and NewYork Dreams as examples of attempts to return to Knowledge (XXG) as a user in good standing, however while using both these accounts you were concurrently socking with disruptive accounts (eg
1529:, I would be willing to accept a six-month one-account restriction and topic ban (though I would be willing to let the ArbCom decide how long these restrictions should last). The work I intend to do would be along the lines of
185:
I'm letting the block stand for now - I'm writing a response to this, so it will take a bit of time for that. I have this page on my watchlist. I can't guarantee that I can respond immediately, but I will visit it periodically.
1741:
and He is no longer committed to editing as much as He did when He joined back in 2005. We clashed back in 2006, but I did apologise to BoG. I never bothered Him so much to make Him lose interest in editing Knowledge (XXG).
534:'s edit history. I wasn't trying to come back and do all the stuff I did back in 2006. I've tried a few times to contact arbcom by email but no one responded and I felt that trying to email arbcom was getting no results.
933:
judgment upon you; I am a very understanding person. It is from this understanding that I do not believe that you can uphold your part of the bargain. Your socks were found because of evident patterns in your editing.
1715:
Eddie, I'd rather not e-mail you. If you have more to contribute to the AN discussion than the rather basic unblock request Roger Davis put there from you, you can say it here, and somebody will move it to AN for you.
3200:
3020:
2784:
2557:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
741:
Those issues aside, If I am allowed to come back, their would be no reason to edit with another account beside this one. That addresses the socking issue. I hope we can reach a conclusion that every agrees with.
2383:
The only pronouns that should be capitalized in the middle of a sentence are "I" and "He," and the latter should only be capitalized when referring to God. Otherwise, they should not be capitalized at all.
655:. To permit you to respond to comments and questions posted in that discussion, the section below has been transcluded onto that page. Any comment you make in the section below, above the <noinclude: -->
1076:
as to whether or not a certain article should be posted) but how do You explain Voltron (I know You're going to tell Me about the account that tried to appeal on My behalf but then again why wasn't user
408:
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
3184:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
3004:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
2768:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
2550:
1491:
I don't think you are harassing people, but I do think you are still editing (either with other accounts or IP addresses) because, as you say yourself, you don't recognize the ban as legitimate.
697:
This section is transcluded from EddieSegoura's talk page to permit him to comment in this discussion. Please make comments or questions directed to EddieSegoura in the section above. Thank you.
549:
3525:
233:
At minimum, I'm sure you recognize that some of your actions on Knowledge (XXG) of late have been less than productive - there is CheckUser evidence to substantiate this, for example, see
2361:
2077:
This sounds fair enough, I may appeal these down the road, but for now, thanks. It's a small price to pay for rejoining the community, but it beats editing with a chip on Your shoulder.
865:
is a Library IP. Now if some other editor happens to edit from that IP in the future, You'd natually assume all future activity would belong to Me, right? That's why I need to know
3066:
to be worried about the file becoming an orphan, you should understand that it still will be an orphan even if you keep re-adding it to the draft and it will still be deleted per
2211:
to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.
1427:
Thanks. I did post a few images from a wiki meetup on my talk page which I uploaded to commons. I met arbiter DGG (David) and other long-time editors there. Sent from my iPhone
2955:
1225:
1533:'s contributions. The purpose of this appeal is not so I can edit but to put an end to a 9-year ordeal. I was blocked back in May 2006 and it's almost 9 years to the day.
1413:
I've safely received your appeal; I'll post it at the administrators' noticeboard shortly. From this point on, it should only take a day or two to resolve. Eddie Segoura <
1815:, no dickering about "how long". Willingness doesn't come into it. Socking was a major part of what you were indeffed for and you still don't understand that? Unbelievable.
1554:
I fully understand I'll be re-banned if I engage in the behaviour that lead Me to this mess back in 2006. That is: making more sockpuppets harassing other users again.
651:
Hello, EddieSegoura. This is to notify you that your request for a ban appeal has been deferred to the Knowledge (XXG) Community and is now (or will shortly be) posted at
715:
First, I'd like to thank those who supported my appeal. I didn't expect many to support giving Me the clean slate I've been trying to attain. Of course, I understand
1473:
That is correct. I logged into WBF when I needed to upload an image (which cannot be done with an IP). Otherwise I edited with an IP when the article is unprotected.
1100:
yours. (BTW, I stated on the original inquiry that "I have no relation to this user" - and I reaffirm that statement, as I have nothing to hide regarding this issue.)
1980:
831:
I'll be happy to (I'd rather do it offsite) but we need to draw a line between the one that actually belong to Me and the one You think belong to Me. Looking at the
2206:
402:
1566:
scars, I'd appreciate it). I also stated I haven't editing in Wiktionary over the past 6 years and no intent on editing wiktionary, just Knowledge (XXG). --
2719:
2539:
1149:'s last IP if it was checked. This user was the first to appeal on My behalf and it was tagged as belonging to Me but I deny this given the language used.
947:
on a personal level, and would turn the other cheek. Your two years of socking and this and that is way too much drama, and it is drama of your own making.
545:
544:
who I argued with. He's accepted the apology and I have not contacted or interacted with Him ever since. Incidently, He was the user that started the
129:
I'm sorry, I don't think an unblocking is appropriate at this time. At minimum, this block will stand for at least 24 hours while we sort things out. --
18:
3318:
2463:
2132:
2101:
1318:
3482:
3135:
2848:
2701:
2611:
2320:
2264:
1500:
Yes, I've been using IPs to edit because for the most part the article I'm editing is open to anons and there is no need to log in with a username.
950:
You can respond to this, of course, but I think I've laid it all on the line regarding my opinion and it's not going to change. I do wish the best,
413:
961:
You are entitled to Your own opinion. Still, knowning their haven't been any incidents since February 2008 I feel I should get that second chance.
1941:
I am watching the process unfold and I understand a one-account condition is an inevitable condition. I take whatever comes to Me at this point.
734:
That being said, I cannot go back in time and change history. All I can say is that I truly regret it. I want to come back a different person.
320:
Please don't request an unblock, Eddie. It just clutters up the backlog. Your case has been agreed on by at least five admins at last count (see
530:: The excessive number of accounts I had were created out of frustration and a few of them were attempts to return as a constructive user. See
1983:, and your request for adminship failed badly. Welcome back good ole pal. I hope you become a valued contributor this time, and not a vandal.
417:
284:
that was fighting with me over the "exicornt" term. He hates the word, anytime i mention it, he calls me a "vandal". Im not here to mess up
1464:
You say that you used WikiBaseballFan to make edits that "you can't do as an anon user". Does this mean that you have been editing as an IP?
1447:
3509:
2933:
2339:
3214:
3034:
2798:
3387:, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the
3063:
2385:
3388:
397:
but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge (XXG) constitutes fair use. Please go to
1984:
799:
409:
2705:
1247:
I believe Sarah may have suspected this account back in the April discussion. I am requesting this account's IP be double-checked.
3539:
3486:
2049:
2722:
1843:
discussion since I still can't edit outside this talkpage. My comments and replies to various supports and opposes can be found
1156:
1059:
763:
449:
This talk page is now unprotected to allow you to appeal your ban. You probably know how to use templates, the one you want is
3210:
3030:
2794:
2063:
2019:
1921:
3193:
3013:
2777:
2202:
1143:'s last IP (Sarah said it was checked so it should be in the log) for any recent activity. This IP belongs to a wifi hotspot.
1593:
777:
656:
tag, will appear on AN for other users to see. If you have any questions, please feel free to post them below or email me at
3474:
3430:
3408:
3119:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a
2832:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a
2693:
2648:
2595:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a
2304:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a
2248:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a
144:
that started all this by nominated exicornt to be deleted. Now he blocks me because in his opinion, mentioning the word in
723:
I did was out of frustration. Being blocked indef in itself was hard enough, but I couldn't take the fact that it was the
3545:
3314:
2861:
2459:
2128:
2097:
1356:
3478:
3124:
2920:
2837:
2697:
2600:
2309:
2253:
3342:
3326:
3270:
719:'s concerns. And yes, I see that I have some opposition to My return (users Friday and EdJohnston). The stuff back in
556:
made His claim before I had a chance to reply. After I argued, I was unblocked and then immediately reblocked by user
2543:
3205:
3025:
2789:
2716:
1802:. They have the final descision on my topic bans and restrictions and how long I would stick to just one account.
1395:
have no interest in editing that site further. As for accounts I may have, I still have the unblocked sockpuppets
1391:(I will change the account Email so it goes there), and I would like you to send your reply to that email address.
345:
339:
2680:
2591:
1441:
3115:
3051:
2657:(which already exists). As a result this article is irrelevant, and is unlikely to be visited by readers anyway.
3310:
2455:
2124:
2093:
37:
3461:
3181:
3001:
2828:
2765:
2300:
2140:
Don't worry, I won't. Just wanted to see if there is anything I can take from those old revisions. Thanks.
2644:
2630:
2389:
1072:
Okay, You win for NYD editing simultaniously with other accounts (when GIDP was blocked it was involved in a
627:
Essjay's claim that I and the throwaway accounts logged in from the same static IP Address, as opposed to AOL
2534:
2518:
2123:
I've restored your user page. Please don't revert to a version that has anything about railroad crossovers.
373:
1979:
Look, EddieSegoura came back, your wish came true! Do you remember him? By the way, Eddie, I remember when
33:
2508:
1988:
832:
793:
3490:
3426:
3412:
2709:
2244:
1179:'s recent activity. As I stated above this is a library IP (has three more anon edits after My posting).
3533:
3528:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ‑‑
2067:
1961:, I see the conditions for being unblocked and I find them fair and very reasonable for the most part.
1925:
1560:
1330:
1176:
1166:
1152:
943:
If you had chosen to just make a new account and leave this be, it is a violation of the ban policy but
854:
398:
389:
2467:
394:
3238:
2888:
1580:
undisclosed user behaving like Me and that I'm still filling the site with disruptive sockpuppets. --
1436:
If you're concerned about any "sockpuppet" accounts I may have used over recent years, I will confirm
3374:
1773:
Sure, I know Bunch didn't leave because of you, not even a little. His reasons were quite different.
1530:
1437:
757:
3168:
2988:
2752:
2734:
2662:
While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be
2417:
1396:
1248:
1187:
3231:
3091:
2907:
2059:
1917:
1634:
202:
121:
93:
3177:
3083:
3059:
2997:
2761:
2412:, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been
2963:
2563:
1820:
1778:
1738:
1721:
1625:
1170:
911:
771:
541:
369:
281:
141:
3075:
1286:
350:
3252:
2353:
303:
228:(near the bottom), so ultimately, the block will be subordinate to the opinion expressed there.
3498:
3457:
3396:
3382:
3356:
2947:
2858:
2676:
2216:
2183:
2141:
2111:
2078:
2027:
1952:
1942:
1893:
1874:
1848:
1803:
1743:
1597:
1581:
1567:
1534:
1501:
1483:
1451:
1421:
1400:
1348:
1319:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard#Community de facto ban appeal by User:EddieSegoura
1290:
1257:
1197:
1193:
1140:
1132:
1086:
1026:
1012:
977:
962:
915:
870:
866:
837:
803:
789:
743:
576:
572:
421:
149:
103:
3189:
3071:
3055:
3009:
2773:
2041:
2034:
1082:
604:
527:
516:
495:
464:
460:
225:
221:
3529:
3521:
2440:
2425:
2164:
1342:
1326:
557:
507:
453:
267:
254:
187:
130:
3444:
3192:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
3185:
3012:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
3005:
2776:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
2769:
2663:
1836:
Do You really believe I'm going to start making even more accounts if I get this unblocked?
1596:
if You have any questions, though I would be willing to answer them here on My talk page.
1478:
1371:
568:
567:
I am open to Email, but I would love to have this resolved on site (either on this page or
537:
468:
321:
3278:
3274:
3143:
2619:
2471:
2408:
Please refrain from making test edits in Knowledge (XXG) pages, such as those you made to
2328:
2272:
1679:
1616:
1520:
1492:
1465:
1276:
1233:
1146:
1064:
1046:
993:
888:
823:
753:
731:
attempts to repost anything related to the article that led to me being in this position.
25:
3120:
3067:
2833:
2596:
2305:
2249:
1840:
1526:
1125:
853:
I understand your concerns, but I can explain it. I can tell you that I did user the IP
652:
328:
3087:
2903:
2413:
2409:
2369:
2054:
1998:
1974:
1956:
1936:
1912:
1886:
1688:
1670:
335:
198:
117:
89:
3443:
While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be
498:. I finally feel like I am getting somewhere after nearly three years of frustration.
2959:
2559:
2040:
Violations of either of the above conditions (and only those two) will result in the
1831:
1816:
1789:
1774:
1732:
1717:
1697:
1643:
1549:
1105:
767:
698:
672:
479:
473:
2092:
There doesn't seem to be a template to welcome you back. So welcome back. Have fun.
3494:
3392:
3260:
2852:
2212:
2198:
1800:
I would be willing to let the ArbCom decide how long these restrictions should last
1322:
907:
531:
459:. Any rationale should directly address the reasons for your banning, which were:
3306:
3245:
3159:
2979:
2743:
2404:
285:
145:
906:: I've tried many times to come back with a new account as a good standing user (
3364:
3286:
2483:
2421:
2177:
2155:
2037:
from "railroad switches", broadly construed, which expressly includes "exicornt"
1652:
1414:
1389:
1364:
1160:
951:
903:
553:
2022:
that you be unbanned with the following conditions (which apply indefinitely):
724:
3526:
Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 8#11 Sepember 2001
3302:
3139:
2615:
2499:
2324:
2268:
1796:
I would be willing to accept a six-month one-account restriction and topic ban
1737:
I'm just watching the progress right now. I recall that I did reconcile with
1706:
1574:
1229:
1226:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive191#EddieSegoura_Ban_Appeal
1041:
781:
716:
102:
I'm not abandoning WP altogether, I'll still come back from time to time. :)
2686:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing
1388:
Sorry it took me time to reply. I thought I had changed my email address to
3282:
2479:
2475:
2365:
1347:
Here is a copy of the letter I sent to arbcom, which was responded to me by
325:
169:
72:
64:
58:
3549:
3502:
3400:
3321:
3218:
3147:
3095:
3038:
2967:
2865:
2802:
2728:
2623:
2567:
2429:
2393:
2373:
2332:
2276:
2220:
2186:
2169:
2144:
2135:
2114:
2104:
2081:
2071:
2005:
1992:
1965:
1945:
1929:
1903:
1851:
1823:
1806:
1781:
1754:
1724:
1608:
1504:
1495:
1486:
1468:
1334:
1301:
1279:
1268:
1237:
1109:
1067:
1049:
996:
956:
891:
881:
848:
826:
814:
746:
710:
684:
587:
484:
428:
377:
307:
271:
257:
205:
190:
133:
124:
96:
50:
24:
These photos were from a Sunday meeting between Knowledge (XXG) editors at
862:
3298:
3294:
2495:
2491:
1661:
1201:
1101:
1090:
1078:
1030:
1016:
981:
966:
919:
874:
841:
807:
580:
491:
178:
In any case I will wait 24 hours and see if my request gets fulfilled.
107:
43:
3516:
3196:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
3016:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
2939:
2780:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
2345:
929:
I appreciate you taking your time to read my comments and reply to them.
181:
Any user with sysop right can email me and we can talk outside of WP.
393:. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
3290:
2487:
1747:
1601:
1538:
1455:
1294:
1261:
280:
The problem I have with this block is that it originally came from a
1811:
How long? How long? Eddie, you're supposed to stick to one account
2447:
2110:
Thanks, I will. It's all about ending 9 years of frustration.
1750:
1604:
1541:
1458:
1317:
Hello Eddie. As you know, your ban appeal is being discussed at
1297:
1264:
1204:
1093:
1033:
1019:
984:
969:
922:
877:
844:
810:
720:
600:
583:
520:
513:
template, I will address the three reasons You mentioned above:
164:
110:
3199:
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review
3019:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
2878:
2783:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
1839:
Bishonen, You are more then welcome to post my comments on the
3438:
Orphaned file with no obvious value in transferring to Commons
1085:— suspected as an account of mine while that other one was?)
266:
wait at least a little bit before requesting an unblocking. --
2946:
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
2352:
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
1370:
I am appealing this: 1. the ban was a result a discussion on
1228:
as having formed no consensus to lift your ban at this time.
1212:
as we approach a meetup in NY on Sunday, I will be attending.
140:
Fine, let it be that way, but I want you to know that it was
3417:
3325:
3251:
3244:
3237:
3230:
3104:
2938:
2815:
2635:
2578:
2551:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Nationals–Mets rivalry
2446:
2439:
2344:
2287:
2231:
490:
Thanks, I really appreciate it. I also would like to thank
63:
49:
3305:, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand
1403:. I never logged into them and they were never blocked.
601:
Request for clarification: EddieSegoura ban appeal attempts
2538:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to
2502:, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
540:: After a few months, I've emailed and apologized to the
519:: While it's true I exausted everyone's patience back in
3074:; the only way to de-orphan the file would be to find a
2416:. If you would like to experiment again, please use the
1173:. The talk page was protected but recently unprotected.
780:). I would like to suggest the following in regards to
3485:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
3467:
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing
3180:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
3000:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
2764:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
2704:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
2532:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
1759:
1120:
1073:
1003:
858:
752:
Just to let everyone know, I have received emails from
728:
637:
626:
615:
238:
234:
217:
3450:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
3269:
From high in the Canadian Arctic I hope you enjoy the
2669:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
2610:
will be deleted after seven days, as described in the
2319:
will be deleted after seven days, as described in the
2263:
will be deleted after seven days, as described in the
1910:
very quickly rebanned if you don't comply with them).
869:'s last IP so I can determine if it's public or not.
3520:
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
2573:
Orphaned non-free image File:2016WorldSeriesLogo.jpg
1183:
The following accounts were recently created by Me:
88:
Take care, Eddie. I hope you decide to come back. —
3379:was updated with an item that involved the article
416:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
3134:will be deleted after seven days, as described in
3101:Orphaned non-free image File:2018 world series.png
2847:will be deleted after seven days, as described in
1368:On March 18, 2015 11:34, EddieSegoura wrote: : -->
1025:PS I got Your emails and I will respond shortly.
494:for His effort in trying to resolve this issue in
1997:I don't know who exactly this is, but I remember
1321:. I've specified my concern there and similar to
2810:Orphaned non-free image File:2017WorldSeries.jpg
2282:Orphaned non-free image File:2014WorldSeries.png
1124:email or if this discussion should continue on
368:tactic that has ever gotten anyone unblocked. —
3136:section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion
3130:Note that any non-free images not used in any
2849:section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion
2843:Note that any non-free images not used in any
2606:Note that any non-free images not used in any
2315:Note that any non-free images not used in any
2259:Note that any non-free images not used in any
1363:On March 19, 2015 at 1:39 AM Roger Davies <
116:That's good to hear. Take care and be safe. —
2052:and a copy will be placed on your talk page.
936:Let me see how diplomatically I can put this:
8:
2918:For more information about Wiki Loves Pride,
2182:Thanks, I'm happy to put it all behind me.
640:The page can only be create by a sysop user.
548:. He also originally blocked Me during the
3086:once their issues have been sorted out. --
2954:redirect, you might want to participate in
2360:redirect, you might want to participate in
2226:Orphaned non-free image File:2013WSLogo.PNG
1163:for 6 months and has expired in August 2008
3050:Hi EddieSegoura. Non-free content such as
2950:. Since you had some involvement with the
2356:. Since you had some involvement with the
383:Fair use rationale for Image:HenryBigg.jpg
2540:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
1525:Reading the appeals and your support on
496:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration
387:Thanks for uploading or contributing to
3456:notice, but please explain why in your
2675:notice, but please explain why in your
1798:, but this is suggestive. I also said
1224:Eddie, I have closed the discussion at
593:
2902:LGBT Wikipedan community should know.
1379:get your respone, we can press ahead.
503:Though I'm not quite ready to use the
2197:A file that you uploaded or altered,
2154:I second the welcoming back. Cheers!
2048:These conditions will be recorded at
2026:You are restricted to using only the
788:The user that performed the check on
7:
3169:2018 Arbitration Committee elections
2989:2017 Arbitration Committee elections
2753:2016 Arbitration Committee elections
2050:Knowledge (XXG):Editing restrictions
1169:'s recent activity. The last IP of
1155:'s recent activity. The last IP of
3182:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
3166:Hello, EddieSegoura. Voting in the
3002:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
2986:Hello, EddieSegoura. Voting in the
2766:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
2750:Hello, EddieSegoura. Voting in the
1760:Bunchofgrapes has left His feedback
638:Exicornt's page creation protection
3445:deleted for any of several reasons
3433:because of the following concern:
3153:ArbCom 2018 election voter message
3078:use for it in an exisitng article.
2973:ArbCom 2017 election voter message
2958:if you have not already done so.
2664:deleted for any of several reasons
2651:because of the following concern:
2364:if you have not already done so.
2203:Knowledge (XXG):Files for deletion
1275:willing to follow the rules here.
14:
3470:{{proposed deletion/dated files}}
3453:{{proposed deletion/dated files}}
2549:The article will be discussed at
2454:From high in the Canadian Arctic
1844:
3515:
3363:
3259:
3158:
2978:
2887:
2742:
2525:
2403:
2193:File:R32.jpg listed for deletion
1880:Regarding closure and conditions
1157:User:Grounded into a double play
1060:User:Grounded into a double play
660:
71:
57:
3524:. The discussion will occur at
3203:and submit your choices on the
3023:and submit your choices on the
2044:being automatically reinstated.
1981:you tried running for adminship
1081:— who initiated the request on
671:For the Arbitration Committee,
2624:02:22, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
952:
616:Creation of the AFD discussion
418:Media copyright questions page
1:
3550:03:39, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
3508:"11 Sepember 2001" listed at
3322:09:01, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
3219:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
3125:our policy for non-free media
3054:cannot be used in drafts per
2838:our policy for non-free media
2803:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
2601:our policy for non-free media
2568:23:21, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
2310:our policy for non-free media
2254:our policy for non-free media
653:WP:AN#EddieSegoura Ban Appeal
429:05:50, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
422:
329:
3503:08:01, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
3401:08:32, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
3148:17:28, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
3039:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
2932:2018 World Series listed at
2870:
2612:criteria for speedy deletion
2592:File:2016WorldSeriesLogo.jpg
2470:! Whether you celebrate the
2430:04:42, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
2394:20:35, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
2374:18:29, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
2333:17:46, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
2321:criteria for speedy deletion
2277:17:42, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
2265:criteria for speedy deletion
2221:20:08, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
414:criteria for speedy deletion
216:This is in response to this
3489:allows discussion to reach
3096:07:08, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
2787:and submit your choices on
2729:12:46, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
2708:allows discussion to reach
2689:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
2672:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
2020:Administrators' noticeboard
3565:
3481:exist. In particular, the
3211:MediaWiki message delivery
3116:File:2018 world series.png
3060:WP:DRAFTS#Preparing drafts
3052:File:2018 world series.png
3031:MediaWiki message delivery
2795:MediaWiki message delivery
2785:the candidates' statements
2700:exist. In particular, the
2018:There is consensus at the
1238:21:33, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
1110:18:53, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
1068:11:05, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
1050:11:14, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
997:10:22, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
957:08:39, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
892:10:22, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
882:20:18, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
849:10:48, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
827:07:41, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
815:22:53, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
747:05:06, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
711:01:11, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
693:Comments from EddieSegoura
685:01:11, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
588:00:07, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
485:22:09, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
399:the image description page
125:03:24, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
97:13:15, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
3475:proposed deletion process
3105:
2877:
2816:
2694:proposed deletion process
2579:
2288:
2232:
661:
401:and edit it to include a
152:04:48, 25 May, 2006 (UTC)
38:Free Culture Alliance NYC
3510:Redirects for discussion
2968:15:57, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
2934:Redirects for discussion
2866:02:44, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
2829:File:2017WorldSeries.jpg
2542:or whether it should be
2340:Redirects for discussion
2301:File:2014WorldSeries.png
2187:21:24, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
2170:17:57, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
2145:01:31, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
2136:21:20, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
2115:10:25, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
2105:19:08, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
2082:06:17, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
2072:05:54, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
2006:00:39, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
1993:21:52, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
1966:00:39, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
1946:16:54, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
1930:13:41, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
1904:05:49, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
1852:17:15, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
1824:17:00, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
1807:16:24, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
1782:17:42, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
1755:13:35, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
1725:10:56, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
1609:01:26, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
1505:05:42, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
1496:04:02, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
1487:03:48, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
1469:03:27, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
1335:19:00, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
1302:13:24, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
1280:03:52, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
1269:21:50, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
378:22:35, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
308:07:37, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
272:07:11, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
258:05:52, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
206:06:28, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
191:05:36, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
175:I posted an {{unblock}}
159:The User That Blocked Me
134:04:45, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
79:Old stuff from 2005-2009
2956:the redirect discussion
2879:WikiLGBT is on Twitter!
2681:the article's talk page
2645:Indians-Red Sox rivalry
2631:Indians-Red Sox rivalry
2362:the redirect discussion
1313:EddieSegoura Ban Appeal
363:Response to your Email:
34:Wikimedia New York City
32:. It was supported by
3441:
3422:
3330:
3256:
3249:
3242:
3235:
3110:
2943:
2821:
2640:
2584:
2535:Nationals–Mets rivalry
2519:Nationals–Mets rivalry
2509:User:WereSpielChequers
2451:
2444:
2349:
2293:
2237:
1587:If anyone is concerned
1417:8:01 AM (7 hours ago)
1159:. This was blocked by
68:
54:
3435:
3431:proposed for deletion
3421:
3329:
3255:
3248:
3241:
3234:
3178:Arbitration Committee
3113:Thanks for uploading
3108:
2998:Arbitration Committee
2942:
2826:Thanks for uploading
2819:
2762:Arbitration Committee
2735:ArbCom Elections 2016
2706:articles for deletion
2649:proposed for deletion
2639:
2629:Proposed deletion of
2589:Thanks for uploading
2582:
2450:
2443:
2348:
2298:Thanks for uploading
2291:
2242:Thanks for uploading
2235:
2201:, has been listed at
1408:Roger Davies replied:
67:
53:
3487:files for discussion
3462:the file's talk page
3371:On 31 October 2019,
3355:ITN recognition for
2899:Hello EddieSegoura!
2338:Digdogger listed at
1531:User:WikiBaseballFan
1131:I also noticed that
861:My appeal. A WHOIS
836:being that person.
3427:File:DealCasino.jpg
3413:File:DealCasino.jpg
3311:CambridgeBayWeather
3267:Hello EddieSegoura:
2456:CambridgeBayWeather
2245:File:2013WSLogo.PNG
2125:CambridgeBayWeather
2094:CambridgeBayWeather
784:'s comments above:
390:Image:HenryBigg.jpg
3479:deletion processes
3423:
3343:Season's Greetings
3331:
3257:
3250:
3243:
3236:
3194:arbitration policy
3111:
3046:Non-free image use
3014:arbitration policy
2944:
2822:
2778:arbitration policy
2737:: Voting now open!
2698:deletion processes
2641:
2585:
2452:
2445:
2350:
2294:
2238:
2042:community site ban
1739:user:Bunchofgrapes
1177:User:38.109.64.162
1171:User:The Blue Lion
1167:User:24.185.47.131
1153:User:24.185.34.186
855:user:38.109.64.162
403:fair use rationale
165:Bunchofgrapes|user
142:User:Bunchofgrapes
69:
55:
3409:Proposed deletion
3383:2019 World Series
3357:2019 World Series
3226:Seasons Greetings
3121:claim of fair use
2952:2018 World Series
2948:2018 World Series
2929:
2928:
2871:We're on Twitter!
2864:
2834:claim of fair use
2597:claim of fair use
2512:
2468:Seasons Greetings
2306:claim of fair use
2250:claim of fair use
2205:. Please see the
2028:User:EddieSegoura
1401:user:PuzzleSolver
1349:User:Roger Davies
1194:User:PuzzleSolver
1141:User:EddieSegoure
483:
354:
3556:
3522:11 Sepember 2001
3519:
3472:
3471:
3455:
3454:
3420:
3367:
3348:
3347:
3341:
3263:
3162:
3107:
3076:policy-compliant
2982:
2891:
2875:
2874:
2857:
2824:
2818:
2746:
2727:
2691:
2690:
2674:
2673:
2638:
2587:
2581:
2529:
2528:
2506:
2407:
2296:
2290:
2240:
2234:
2181:
2162:
1978:
1960:
1940:
1897:
1890:
1835:
1793:
1736:
1710:
1701:
1692:
1683:
1674:
1665:
1656:
1647:
1638:
1629:
1620:
1578:
1564:
1561:Stephen G. Brown
1553:
1524:
1346:
954:
833:list of accounts
667:
665:
664:
663:
641:
635:
629:
624:
618:
613:
607:
598:
512:
506:
477:
458:
452:
446:
445:
441:
426:
410:my contributions
348:
331:
75:
61:
47:
28:in Manhattan on
3564:
3563:
3559:
3558:
3557:
3555:
3554:
3553:
3513:
3483:speedy deletion
3469:
3468:
3452:
3451:
3418:
3416:
3405:
3404:
3389:candidates page
3368:
3360:
3350:
3345:
3339:
3337:
3332:
3307:Knowledge (XXG)
3279:Summer solstice
3264:
3228:
3223:
3222:
3163:
3155:
3138:. Thank you. --
3103:
3048:
3043:
3042:
2983:
2975:
2937:
2892:
2873:
2813:
2812:
2807:
2806:
2790:the voting page
2747:
2739:
2713:
2702:speedy deletion
2688:
2687:
2671:
2670:
2636:
2634:
2614:. Thank you. --
2576:
2575:
2530:
2526:
2523:
2514:
2476:Summer Solstice
2466:is wishing you
2437:
2401:
2381:
2343:
2323:. Thank you. --
2285:
2284:
2267:. Thank you. --
2229:
2228:
2195:
2175:
2156:
2090:
2016:
1972:
1950:
1934:
1891:
1884:
1882:
1870:
1829:
1813:all of the time
1787:
1730:
1704:
1695:
1686:
1677:
1668:
1659:
1650:
1641:
1632:
1623:
1614:
1589:
1572:
1558:
1547:
1518:
1438:WikiBaseballFan
1433:
1360:
1340:
1315:
1256:belong to Me.
1245:
1222:
1147:User:Malmindser
945:I wouldn't care
725:very same user
695:
659:
657:
649:
644:
636:
632:
625:
621:
614:
610:
599:
595:
510:
504:
456:
450:
447:
443:
439:
437:
436:
385:
365:
343:
213:
161:
86:
81:
41:
26:Barnard College
22:
12:
11:
5:
3562:
3560:
3512:
3506:
3493:for deletion.
3473:will stop the
3415:
3406:
3369:
3362:
3361:
3359:
3353:
3352:
3351:
3335:
3315:Uqaqtuq (talk)
3271:holiday season
3258:
3229:
3227:
3224:
3201:the candidates
3164:
3157:
3156:
3154:
3151:
3102:
3099:
3047:
3044:
3021:the candidates
2984:
2977:
2976:
2974:
2971:
2936:
2930:
2927:
2926:
2925:
2924:
2921:→ click here ←
2914:
2913:
2912:
2911:
2900:
2893:
2886:
2883:
2882:
2881:
2872:
2869:
2851:. Thank you. —
2811:
2808:
2748:
2741:
2740:
2738:
2732:
2712:for deletion.
2692:will stop the
2660:
2659:
2633:
2627:
2574:
2571:
2524:
2522:
2517:Nomination of
2515:
2503:
2460:Uqaqtuq (talk)
2438:
2436:
2433:
2410:Florence Finch
2400:
2397:
2380:
2377:
2342:
2336:
2283:
2280:
2227:
2224:
2194:
2191:
2190:
2189:
2152:
2151:
2150:
2149:
2148:
2147:
2129:Uqaqtuq (talk)
2118:
2117:
2098:Uqaqtuq (talk)
2089:
2086:
2085:
2084:
2046:
2045:
2038:
2031:
2015:
2012:
2011:
2010:
2009:
2008:
1999:user:Viriditas
1970:
1969:
1968:
1948:
1881:
1878:
1869:
1866:
1865:
1864:
1863:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1859:
1858:
1857:
1856:
1855:
1854:
1837:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1763:
1757:
1712:
1711:
1702:
1693:
1684:
1675:
1666:
1657:
1648:
1639:
1635:SheffieldSteel
1630:
1621:
1588:
1585:
1556:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1474:
1432:
1429:
1412:
1410:
1406:
1397:user:PrimaDoll
1384:
1382:
1380:
1377:
1375:
1359:
1353:
1339:
1314:
1311:
1309:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1249:User:DougsTech
1244:
1241:
1221:
1218:
1216:
1214:
1213:
1209:
1208:
1191:
1188:User:PrimaDoll
1181:
1180:
1174:
1164:
1150:
1144:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1023:
1008:
1004:ANI discussion
990:
989:
988:
976:them oppose.
973:
948:
941:
937:
934:
930:
900:
899:
898:
897:
896:
895:
894:
863:clearly states
851:
818:
817:
750:
727:who nominated
706:
703:
694:
691:
689:
680:
677:
648:
645:
643:
642:
630:
619:
608:
603:Discussion on
592:
591:
590:
564:
563:
562:
561:
550:ANI discussion
546:AFD discussion
535:
525:
500:
499:
435:
432:
384:
381:
364:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
333:
313:
312:
311:
310:
292:
291:
290:
289:
275:
274:
261:
260:
249:
248:
243:
242:
230:
229:
212:
209:
194:
193:
160:
157:
156:
155:
154:
153:
138:
137:
136:
85:
82:
80:
77:
30:March 22, 2015
21:
19:NYC Wikimeetup
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3561:
3552:
3551:
3547:
3544:
3541:
3538:
3535:
3531:
3527:
3523:
3518:
3511:
3507:
3505:
3504:
3500:
3496:
3492:
3488:
3484:
3480:
3476:
3465:
3463:
3459:
3448:
3446:
3440:
3439:
3434:
3432:
3428:
3414:
3410:
3407:
3403:
3402:
3398:
3394:
3390:
3386:
3385:
3384:
3378:
3377:
3376:
3366:
3358:
3354:
3349:
3344:
3338:Adapted from
3334:
3333:
3328:
3324:
3323:
3320:
3316:
3312:
3308:
3304:
3300:
3296:
3292:
3288:
3284:
3280:
3276:
3272:
3268:
3262:
3254:
3247:
3240:
3233:
3225:
3221:
3220:
3216:
3212:
3208:
3207:
3202:
3197:
3195:
3191:
3187:
3183:
3179:
3174:
3171:
3170:
3161:
3152:
3150:
3149:
3145:
3141:
3137:
3133:
3128:
3126:
3122:
3118:
3117:
3100:
3098:
3097:
3093:
3089:
3085:
3079:
3077:
3073:
3069:
3065:
3061:
3057:
3053:
3045:
3041:
3040:
3036:
3032:
3028:
3027:
3022:
3017:
3015:
3011:
3007:
3003:
2999:
2994:
2991:
2990:
2981:
2972:
2970:
2969:
2965:
2961:
2957:
2953:
2949:
2941:
2935:
2931:
2922:
2919:
2916:
2915:
2909:
2905:
2898:
2897:
2896:
2895:
2894:
2890:
2885:
2884:
2880:
2876:
2868:
2867:
2863:
2860:
2856:
2855:
2850:
2846:
2841:
2839:
2835:
2831:
2830:
2823:
2809:
2805:
2804:
2800:
2796:
2792:
2791:
2786:
2781:
2779:
2775:
2771:
2767:
2763:
2758:
2755:
2754:
2745:
2736:
2733:
2731:
2730:
2726:
2725:
2724:
2721:
2718:
2711:
2707:
2703:
2699:
2695:
2684:
2682:
2678:
2667:
2665:
2658:
2654:
2653:
2652:
2650:
2646:
2632:
2628:
2626:
2625:
2621:
2617:
2613:
2609:
2604:
2602:
2598:
2594:
2593:
2586:
2572:
2570:
2569:
2565:
2561:
2555:
2552:
2547:
2545:
2541:
2537:
2536:
2520:
2516:
2513:
2510:
2507:Adapted from
2504:
2501:
2497:
2493:
2489:
2485:
2481:
2477:
2473:
2469:
2465:
2461:
2457:
2449:
2442:
2434:
2432:
2431:
2427:
2423:
2420:. Thank you.
2419:
2415:
2411:
2406:
2399:December 2015
2398:
2396:
2395:
2391:
2387:
2386:24.249.49.231
2378:
2376:
2375:
2371:
2367:
2363:
2359:
2355:
2347:
2341:
2337:
2335:
2334:
2330:
2326:
2322:
2318:
2313:
2311:
2307:
2303:
2302:
2295:
2281:
2279:
2278:
2274:
2270:
2266:
2262:
2257:
2255:
2251:
2247:
2246:
2239:
2225:
2223:
2222:
2218:
2214:
2210:
2209:
2204:
2200:
2192:
2188:
2185:
2179:
2174:
2173:
2172:
2171:
2168:
2167:
2163:
2161:
2160:
2146:
2143:
2139:
2138:
2137:
2134:
2130:
2126:
2122:
2121:
2120:
2119:
2116:
2113:
2109:
2108:
2107:
2106:
2103:
2099:
2095:
2087:
2083:
2080:
2076:
2075:
2074:
2073:
2069:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2056:
2051:
2043:
2039:
2036:
2032:
2029:
2025:
2024:
2023:
2021:
2013:
2007:
2004:
2000:
1996:
1995:
1994:
1990:
1986:
1982:
1976:
1971:
1967:
1964:
1958:
1954:
1949:
1947:
1944:
1938:
1933:
1932:
1931:
1927:
1923:
1919:
1915:
1914:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1902:
1895:
1888:
1879:
1877:
1876:
1867:
1853:
1850:
1846:
1842:
1838:
1833:
1828:
1827:
1825:
1822:
1818:
1814:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1805:
1801:
1797:
1791:
1786:
1785:
1783:
1780:
1776:
1772:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1761:
1758:
1756:
1752:
1749:
1745:
1740:
1734:
1729:
1728:
1726:
1723:
1719:
1714:
1713:
1708:
1703:
1699:
1694:
1690:
1685:
1681:
1676:
1672:
1667:
1663:
1658:
1654:
1649:
1645:
1640:
1636:
1631:
1627:
1626:Bunchofgrapes
1622:
1618:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1606:
1603:
1599:
1595:
1586:
1584:
1583:
1576:
1570:
1569:
1562:
1555:
1551:
1545:
1543:
1540:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1522:
1506:
1503:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1494:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1485:
1480:
1475:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1467:
1463:
1462:
1460:
1457:
1453:
1449:
1446:
1443:
1439:
1435:
1434:
1430:
1428:
1426:
1425:My 2nd reply:
1423:
1418:
1415:
1409:
1404:
1402:
1398:
1392:
1390:
1387:
1383:Roger Davies
1373:
1365:
1358:
1354:
1352:
1350:
1344:
1337:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1312:
1310:
1303:
1299:
1296:
1292:
1288:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1278:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1266:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1250:
1242:
1240:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1220:Community ban
1219:
1217:
1211:
1210:
1206:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1192:
1189:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1178:
1175:
1172:
1168:
1165:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1151:
1148:
1145:
1142:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1134:
1129:
1127:
1122:
1119:Please don't
1111:
1107:
1103:
1098:
1097:
1095:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1075:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1066:
1061:
1057:
1051:
1048:
1043:
1038:
1037:
1035:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1021:
1018:
1014:
1009:
1005:
1000:
999:
998:
995:
991:
986:
983:
979:
974:
971:
968:
964:
960:
959:
958:
955:
949:
946:
942:
938:
935:
931:
928:
927:
926:
925:at 11:13 AM
924:
921:
917:
913:
912:NewYorkDreams
909:
905:
893:
890:
885:
884:
883:
879:
876:
872:
868:
864:
860:
856:
852:
850:
846:
843:
839:
834:
830:
829:
828:
825:
820:
819:
816:
812:
809:
805:
801:
798:
795:
791:
787:
786:
785:
783:
779:
776:
773:
769:
765:
762:
759:
755:
749:
748:
745:
739:
735:
732:
729:
726:
722:
718:
713:
712:
709:
708:
707:
704:
701:
692:
690:
687:
686:
683:
682:
681:
678:
675:
669:
654:
646:
639:
634:
631:
628:
623:
620:
617:
612:
609:
606:
602:
597:
594:
589:
585:
582:
578:
574:
570:
566:
565:
559:
555:
551:
547:
543:
539:
536:
533:
529:
526:
522:
518:
515:
514:
509:
502:
501:
497:
493:
489:
488:
487:
486:
481:
476:
475:
470:
466:
462:
455:
442:
433:
431:
430:
427:
425:
420:. Thank you.
419:
415:
411:
406:
404:
400:
396:
392:
391:
382:
380:
379:
375:
371:
370:Bunchofgrapes
362:
352:
347:
341:
337:
332:
327:
323:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
309:
305:
301:
296:
295:
294:
293:
287:
283:
279:
278:
277:
276:
273:
270:
269:
263:
262:
259:
256:
251:
250:
245:
244:
240:
236:
232:
231:
227:
223:
219:
218:followup post
215:
214:
210:
208:
207:
204:
200:
192:
189:
184:
183:
182:
179:
176:
173:
171:
166:
158:
151:
148:is a crime.
147:
143:
139:
135:
132:
128:
127:
126:
123:
119:
115:
114:
112:
109:
105:
101:
100:
99:
98:
95:
91:
84:Buenas suerte
83:
78:
76:
74:
66:
62:
60:
52:
48:
45:
39:
35:
31:
27:
20:
16:
3542:
3536:
3514:
3477:, but other
3466:
3458:edit summary
3449:
3442:
3437:
3436:
3424:
3381:
3380:
3373:
3372:
3370:
3336:
3301:or even the
3266:
3265:
3204:
3198:
3175:
3167:
3165:
3131:
3129:
3114:
3112:
3080:
3049:
3024:
3018:
2995:
2987:
2985:
2951:
2945:
2917:
2853:
2844:
2842:
2827:
2825:
2814:
2788:
2782:
2759:
2751:
2749:
2720:CleverPhrase
2715:
2714:
2696:, but other
2685:
2677:edit summary
2668:
2661:
2655:
2643:The article
2642:
2607:
2605:
2590:
2588:
2577:
2556:
2548:
2533:
2531:
2521:for deletion
2505:
2498:or even the
2453:
2402:
2382:
2357:
2351:
2316:
2314:
2299:
2297:
2286:
2260:
2258:
2243:
2241:
2230:
2207:
2199:File:R32.jpg
2196:
2165:
2158:
2157:
2153:
2091:
2088:Welcome back
2053:
2047:
2035:topic banned
2017:
2002:
1985:172.56.6.170
1962:
1953:Roger Davies
1911:
1900:
1894:Roger Davies
1883:
1871:
1812:
1799:
1795:
1590:
1571:
1557:
1546:
1517:
1444:
1431:End of email
1424:
1419:
1407:
1405:
1393:
1385:
1367:wrote: : -->
1361:
1338:
1316:
1308:
1253:
1246:
1223:
1215:
1182:
1133:VirtualSteve
1130:
1118:
1096:at 11:33 AM
1036:at 10:59 AM
944:
901:
867:EddieSegoure
796:
790:EddieSegoure
774:
760:
751:
744:EddieSegoura
740:
736:
733:
714:
700:
699:
696:
688:
674:
673:
670:
658:hersfoldwiki
650:
633:
622:
611:
596:
528:Sockpuppetry
472:
465:sockpuppetry
448:
434:Unprotected
423:
407:
388:
386:
366:
299:
264:
195:
180:
177:
174:
162:
87:
70:
56:
29:
23:
17:Action from
3530:Neveselbert
3375:In the news
3283:Quviahugvik
3206:voting page
3026:voting page
2480:Quviahugvik
2435:Quviahugvik
1544:at 5:00 am
1461:at 7:50 pm
1343:Ncmvocalist
1327:Ncmvocalist
1207:at 23:43 PM
1022:at 23:43 PM
987:at 11:40 AM
972:at 10:59 AM
918:, Saturday
873:, Saturday
840:, Saturday
558:HappyCamper
268:HappyCamper
255:HappyCamper
188:HappyCamper
131:HappyCamper
36:and fellow
3319:Sunasuttuq
3309:. Cheers,
3303:Saturnalia
3190:topic bans
3010:topic bans
2774:topic bans
2500:Saturnalia
2464:Sunasuttuq
2208:discussion
2133:Sunasuttuq
2102:Sunasuttuq
1680:EdJohnston
1617:Alvestrand
1537:, Tuesday
1521:Salvidrim!
1381:For BASC,
1355:Letter to
1042:ad hominem
1040:engage in
754:Carcharoth
738:person.
647:Ban appeal
538:Harassment
469:harassment
351:2006-05-26
211:A response
40:partners.
3491:consensus
3429:has been
3425:The file
3186:site bans
3088:Marchjuly
3084:WP:REFUND
3072:WP:NFCC#7
3056:WP:NFCC#9
3006:site bans
2904:RachelWex
2770:site bans
2710:consensus
2647:has been
2511:greetings
2358:Digdogger
2354:Digdogger
2055:Callanecc
1975:Viriditas
1957:Callanecc
1937:Callanecc
1913:Callanecc
1887:Callanecc
1794:, I said
1753:at 13:35
1746:, Monday
1689:Hesperian
1671:Jehochman
1607:at 01:26
1600:, Monday
1454:, Sunday
1411:Hi Eddie:
1386:My reply:
1376:Hi Eddie:
1300:at 13:24
1293:, Sunday
1287:duck test
1267:at 21:50
1260:, Friday
1243:DougsTech
1200:, Sunday
1190:- Unused.
1089:, Sunday
1029:, Sunday
1015:, Sunday
980:, Sunday
965:, Sunday
880:at 20:18
847:at 10:48
813:at 22:53
806:, Friday
666:gmail.com
586:at 00:07
579:, Monday
517:Vandalism
461:vandalism
344:at 07:43
286:wikipedia
199:Viriditas
170:vandalism
146:wikipedia
118:Viriditas
113:at 02:09
106:, Monday
90:Viriditas
3540:contribs
3299:Hanukkah
3295:Hogmanay
3132:articles
2960:Jdavi333
2862:contribs
2845:articles
2608:articles
2560:Muboshgu
2496:Hannukah
2492:Hogmanay
2414:reverted
2379:Pronouns
2317:articles
2261:articles
2064:contribs
2033:You are
2030:account.
2014:Unbanned
1922:contribs
1868:A Pledge
1832:Bishonen
1817:Bishonen
1790:Bishonen
1775:Bishonen
1733:Bishonen
1718:Bishonen
1698:Mr.Z-man
1644:Bishonen
1594:Email Me
1550:HiDrNick
1448:contribs
1202:April 26
1091:April 26
1031:April 26
1017:April 26
982:April 26
967:April 26
920:April 25
875:April 25
842:April 25
808:April 24
800:contribs
778:contribs
768:Hersfold
764:contribs
581:April 20
573:Exicornt
395:fair use
108:April 17
3495:Salavat
3393:Bagumba
2854:MRD2014
2544:deleted
2418:sandbox
2213:Stefan2
1323:BusterD
1121:attempt
1083:WP:RFAR
1074:dispute
908:Voltron
605:WP:RFAR
532:Voltron
508:unblock
454:unblock
424:Chillum
3460:or on
3291:Diwali
3275:Winter
3273:, the
2717:Insert
2679:or on
2488:Diwali
2472:Winter
2422:Dl2000
2178:BD2412
2159:bd2412
1748:May 18
1653:Keegan
1602:May 18
1539:May 19
1479:WP:ANI
1456:May 17
1295:July 5
1262:July 3
1161:Alison
953:Keegan
904:Keegan
766:) and
554:Essjay
552:after
438:": -->
322:WP:ANI
288:pages.
3546:email
3140:B-bot
3068:WP:F5
2616:B-bot
2325:B-bot
2269:B-bot
2184:Eddie
2142:Eddie
2112:Eddie
2079:Eddie
2003:Eddie
1963:Eddie
1943:Eddie
1901:Eddie
1875:Eddie
1849:Eddie
1841:WP:AN
1804:Eddie
1744:Eddie
1707:Sarah
1598:Eddie
1582:Eddie
1575:Sarah
1568:Eddie
1535:Eddie
1527:WP:AN
1502:Eddie
1493:Sarah
1484:Eddie
1466:Sarah
1452:Eddie
1422:Roger
1416:: -->
1369:: -->
1366:: -->
1362:: -->
1291:Eddie
1277:Sarah
1258:Eddie
1230:Kevin
1198:Eddie
1126:WP:AN
1087:Eddie
1065:Sarah
1047:Sarah
1027:Eddie
1013:Eddie
1007:easy.
994:Sarah
978:Eddie
963:Eddie
916:Eddie
889:Sarah
871:Eddie
838:Eddie
824:Sarah
804:Eddie
782:Sarah
717:Sarah
577:Eddie
480:Help!
304:email
300:Eddie
150:Eddie
104:Eddie
3534:talk
3499:talk
3397:talk
3215:talk
3176:The
3144:talk
3092:talk
3070:and
3064:here
3058:and
3035:talk
2996:The
2964:talk
2908:talk
2859:talk
2799:talk
2760:The
2723:Here
2620:talk
2564:talk
2426:talk
2390:talk
2370:talk
2366:Izno
2329:talk
2273:talk
2217:talk
2068:logs
2060:talk
1989:talk
1955:and
1926:logs
1918:talk
1845:here
1821:talk
1779:talk
1751:2015
1722:talk
1605:2015
1542:2015
1459:2015
1442:talk
1399:and
1357:BASC
1331:talk
1298:2009
1265:2009
1234:talk
1205:2009
1128:.
1106:talk
1094:2009
1034:2009
1020:2009
985:2009
970:2009
923:2009
878:2009
859:post
845:2009
811:2009
794:talk
772:talk
758:talk
721:2006
705:fold
702:Hers
679:fold
676:Hers
584:2009
542:user
524:way)
521:2006
467:and
440:edit
374:talk
282:user
237:and
226:here
224:and
222:here
203:Talk
172:.
163:The
122:Talk
111:2006
94:Talk
3411:of
3391:. —
3287:Eid
3277:or
3127:).
2840:).
2603:).
2484:Eid
2474:or
2312:).
2256:).
2001:.
1847:.
1662:TML
1420:to
1372:ani
1254:not
1102:TML
1079:TML
902:To
857:to
569:ANI
492:TML
474:Guy
346:UTC
326:NSL
44:DGG
3548:)
3501:)
3464:.
3447:.
3399:)
3346:}}
3340:{{
3317:,
3313:,
3297:,
3293:,
3289:,
3285:,
3281:,
3217:)
3209:.
3188:,
3146:)
3094:)
3037:)
3029:.
3008:,
2966:)
2801:)
2793:.
2772:,
2683:.
2666:.
2622:)
2566:)
2558:–
2546:.
2494:,
2490:,
2486:,
2482:,
2478:,
2462:,
2458:,
2428:)
2392:)
2372:)
2331:)
2275:)
2219:)
2131:,
2127:,
2100:,
2096:,
2070:)
2066:•
2062:•
1991:)
1928:)
1924:•
1920:•
1826:.
1819:|
1784:.
1777:|
1727:.
1720:|
1351::
1333:)
1236:)
1108:)
910:,
668:.
511:}}
505:{{
471:.
463:,
457:}}
451:{{
405:.
376:)
306:)
201:|
186:--
120:|
92:|
3543:·
3537:·
3532:(
3497:(
3395:(
3213:(
3142:(
3109:⚠
3090:(
3033:(
2962:(
2923:.
2910:)
2906:(
2820:⚠
2797:(
2618:(
2583:⚠
2562:(
2424:(
2388:(
2368:(
2327:(
2292:⚠
2271:(
2236:⚠
2215:(
2180::
2176:@
2166:T
2058:(
1987:(
1977::
1973:@
1959::
1951:@
1939::
1935:@
1916:(
1896::
1892:@
1889::
1885:@
1834::
1830:@
1792::
1788:@
1762:.
1735::
1731:@
1709::
1705:@
1700::
1696:@
1691::
1687:@
1682::
1678:@
1673::
1669:@
1664::
1660:@
1655::
1651:@
1646::
1642:@
1637::
1633:@
1628::
1624:@
1619::
1615:@
1577::
1573:@
1563::
1559:@
1552::
1548:@
1523::
1519:@
1445:·
1440:(
1345::
1341:@
1329:(
1285:"
1232:(
1104:(
797:·
792:(
775:·
770:(
761:·
756:(
560:.
482:)
478:(
444:]
372:(
353:)
349:(
342:)
340:C
338:+
336:T
334:(
330:E
302:(
239:2
235:1
46::
42:@
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
