31:
73:
Of the three of them who were involved in the discussion about inclusion of the word 'fringe' as a definition in the intro, two of them (John Shandy, Loremaster) have not contested, nor expressed any difficulty with the new lead. So again how do you suppose it goes against consensus? In fact its even
113:
I'd just point out that consensus is not a vote. The last time I checked the talk page, Loremaster had stated that he was frustrated with the article and was taking a break. Not to mention that consensus seems strongly against giving a dictionary more weight than experts in the field - which is my
69:
Hi
Eldamorie. To date there have been six people inviolved in discussions on this article. So at present its three against three. I therefore don't see how you can fairly argue for a consensus aginst the lead as it is.
90:
So my change is totally in accordance with what these two people have suggested we do so and is therefore TOTALLY in concord with those involved in the discussion and therefore can not be fairly undone on a claim of
84:
Two of them (John Shandy, Loremaster) have since suggested we other three go ahead and make whatever changes we think and when they have more time, they intend to discuss:
86:"do what you will with it we can revisit the lead when there's something more concrete and updated for us to hack away at and poke and prod with..."
95:. Its three against three without any of the above and both the main protaganists have accepted changes being made till they have more time.
98:
I have also added this message to you to the conspiracy theory discussion page, so if you want to answer, please do so there.--
114:
primary concern, not the usage of the word "fringe" which seems to have become something of a straw man in this discussion.
38:
103:
115:
123:
119:
107:
47:
17:
99:
79:
I don't care at all about the lead paragraph right now - I'm only concerned that...
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
25:
77:
One of these three has accepted the lead as it is ("
8:
81:" John Shandy), so he has accepted it.
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
7:
74:been edited and adjusted slightly.
24:
29:
65:New lead - consensus and undos
1:
124:19:09, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
108:06:03, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
93:reverting to consensus view
140:
42:of past discussions.
18:User talk:Eldamorie
60:Conspiracy theory
54:
53:
48:current talk page
131:
33:
32:
26:
139:
138:
134:
133:
132:
130:
129:
128:
67:
62:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
137:
135:
127:
126:
66:
63:
61:
58:
56:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
136:
125:
121:
117:
112:
111:
110:
109:
105:
101:
100:Mystichumwipe
96:
94:
88:
87:
82:
80:
75:
71:
64:
59:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
97:
92:
89:
85:
83:
78:
76:
72:
68:
55:
43:
37:
36:This is an
116:eldamorie
39:archive
16:<
120:talk
104:talk
122:)
106:)
118:(
102:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.