1012:
which means that when I go to an archived date from 2018, it only shows the information for today, unlike the archives from 2008-2017. This website I found, Anime
Superhero, usually keeps track of the TV schedules for all of the Nickelodeon channels, which they've been doing since the 2000s, so that's where I've been getting some of the last air dates from last year because of the new Zap2It design. But nowadays, every time I put updates on the schedule changes for the Nick channels, you keep saying it's false, but it's not! Is there maybe new rules on Knowledge that is preventing me from making me do what I've been doing since last year? (
1084:
188:
115:
30:
941:
300:
497:? Granted, multiple editors are involved, but this dispute, just like the last time this happened, has been drawn out for months with no sign of reaching a consensus anytime soon. I think we should see what multiple admins have to say about the album's inclusion, and we should get as much input from as many editors as we can. This has dragged on for far too long.
605:. There was a massive RFC on this. Bringing things up at every venue under the sun isnât going to drive a resolution on things. You were right to remove the ANI report - they donât address minor content disputes. It would have gone nowhere. Arbcom is extremely unlikely to work as well. Seriously, this is a minor dispute over a thing of little importance.
1172:
1011:
Hi there, I've been keeping track of the TV schedules for
Nicktoons and Nick Jr. since last year, and have always been adding sources without any problem. As for old last air dates, it's impossible to look on Zap2It archives on Internet Archive starting in 2018 because they got a new design last year
755:
How are you not getting this? There are people who are not that troll who supported it. There was a massive RFC where like 10+ people supported the content. Not all 10 were socks. Therefore, your rationale is invalid. There has been months on disccussion on the talk page. Seriously, do you think that
703:
You have been told multiple times that is not a valid rationale. Stop dwelling on all of that. There is an active dispute amongst editors who is not that editor. You cannot use that as an excuse to edit without consensus. Seriously, how many bad decisions can you make on this topic? 2 rejected RFCs.
476:
Years of maintaining the article, and seeing the variety of good and bogus entries be added or proposed for the article. I mean, look at my 2014 comment again. I was there literally asking for guidance on how people had previously policed the article. What about that makes you think I understood the
360:
You cannot use DENY as a rationale for edit warring just because an editor from years ago held the same stance of some unrelated editors currently. This has been a month spanning dispute, we donât need yet another editor jumping in on the reverting. Feel free to take part in the discussions but that
351:
on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's workâwhether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each timeâcounts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit
851:
You donât need to do anything other than wait for someone to create the RFC, and then comment in that. Please focus on consensus building, not obsessing over âwinningâ against some long term troll. Again, if that was a viable path, that would haven done months ago and this would have been done with
520:
We just ran a month-plus spanning RFC that ended without resolution, so itâs not the type of thing that is going to find resolution at DRN. Also, Admin may have have the ability to block editors or protect/lock articles, but they donât have any extra power in content disputes like this. (I should
261:
That incident is serious bro! Where else am I supposed to put it if it's not needed in the US feed? It would needed to be there no matter what, Look again at the article dude. You'll see that it talks about it in other locations, so why not the hacking incident? Tell where other
Cartoon Network
127:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before
Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
200:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before
Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
310:; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the
704:
A rejected ANI report. A rejected Arbcom case. Pretty sure there were some other rejected noticeboard discussions you started too. Please stop before you get blocked for disruptive editing and wasting the communityâs time with these bad decisions you keep making.
952:
42:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before
Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
683:
am the real
CriticismEdits, and I have not organized any activities that would harm Knowledge's purpose as an encyclopedia, both on my original username, and my new one right now. Users Diva206 and Hazard907 just copied my userpage.
825:
I kinda feel like we're gonna need multiple opinions from admins on this, though, because of how hotly-contested the issue is. Just one opinion is not gonna cut it for me. Do you think there are any who'd be willing to weigh in?
1127:
228:
155:
70:
756:
people are discussing for months just so that you can unilaterally do whatever you want? If it were as simple as your flawed premise, it would have been deleted months ago. How can you not realize this?
1111:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
212:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
139:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
54:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
732:
is perfectly valid in this case. The dispute only exists because of TAWT's actions. By continuing to allow Sgt. Pepper on the list, we are giving TAWT the kind of attention they crave.
1097:
986:
so on a highly dynamic range when there's been no edits in a long time. The user in question will have long moved on from those addresses, and tagging the userpage only serves to
402:
reinstated it again in the midst of repeated removals, saying "Was removed years ago without a shred of consensus - same nonsense now. Absolutely meets criteria for inclusion."
1180:
437:
Yes, believe it or not, I changed my stance over the course of five years. That doesnât somehow excuse your misapplication of DENY correct or excuse your repeated reverting.
963:
during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
403:
898:
The latest discussion was a brainstorming session on how to approach the RFC. Maybe contribute to that rather than storming ahead the wrong way and failing again?
631:, the Arbitration Committee has agreed that arbitration is not required at this stage. The comments made by the arbitrators can be viewed at the above link.
477:
scope and function of the article at that point? Also note I essentially have taken the stance of the one person who actually responded to me back then.
1214:. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at
414:. The current version of this issue is happening because an editor somehow decided to re-open an old wound. Do you see the underlying issues here?
1063:
888:
839:
792:
745:
578:
510:
466:
427:
283:
319:
1149:
242:
169:
84:
960:
944:
933:
1211:
1164:
588:
Too bad, since I agreed with what you'd put. I wish a higher admin would see what's happening and say who's right and who's wrong.
1145:
628:
590:
555:
238:
165:
100:
I highly doubt you'll read this since you left, but since you have not edited since
November 4, 2016, I have placed you on the
80:
311:
635:
also contains information and advice about resolving disputes on
Knowledge which you may find useful. I hope this helps. â
1120:
689:
632:
327:
221:
148:
63:
1210:
may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the
1132:
644:
331:
233:
160:
75:
664:
1207:
339:
728:
How is it not a valid rationale? An IP sock of The abominable Wiki troll reinstated the entry, and I feel that
951:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
685:
553:
Why did you delete your concerns in the Admin incidents page? I agreed with your concerns, I have the same.
660:
1056:
1051:
1017:
997:
904:
881:
876:
858:
832:
827:
808:
785:
780:
762:
738:
733:
710:
611:
571:
566:
527:
503:
498:
483:
459:
454:
443:
420:
415:
367:
344:
323:
322:
for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant
307:
276:
271:
270:
Take this issue to the article's talk page. There's already a discussion set up if you want to weigh in.
1108:
209:
136:
51:
1030:
1013:
1183:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
1176:
968:
1035:
Listen, you can't put your sources in the edit summary and call it a day. You actually need to have
602:
315:
101:
1215:
779:
Does that really override the fact that a block-evading sockpuppet was responsible for it all?
1091:
992:
899:
870:
853:
820:
803:
774:
757:
723:
705:
606:
522:
478:
438:
381:
362:
196:
123:
38:
20:
1222:
1188:
1139:
1104:
1047:
1043:
407:
205:
132:
47:
1119:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
220:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
147:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
62:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
964:
637:
254:
982:
Hi there, please don't add sock tags on IP user pages. It is practically never helpful,
1116:
987:
729:
411:
348:
217:
144:
59:
394:. Less than four years later, an IP editor reinstated it without explanation, as seen
1112:
956:
953:
Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/The abominable Wiki troll
948:
494:
263:
213:
140:
55:
940:
947:, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
1229:
1192:
1153:
1083:
1068:
1021:
1001:
972:
909:
893:
863:
844:
813:
797:
767:
750:
715:
693:
668:
649:
616:
594:
583:
559:
532:
515:
488:
471:
448:
432:
372:
288:
246:
187:
173:
114:
88:
29:
356:âshould your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
1184:
318:
among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See
1206:! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to
299:
659:
Talk: Any way that you can help me how to properly add sources to
Knowledge? (
1181:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 3#Template:Uw-error4im
1171:
1123:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
306:
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an
224:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
151:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
66:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1101:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
521:
know - I am one.) Many Admin participated in the recent RFC anyways.
1136:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
104:
list. though you can remove yourself if you choose to comeback.
1126:
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
404:
In this discussion where you provided rationale for the removal
347:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
227:
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review
154:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
69:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
959:
with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
298:
1095:
is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
1107:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
399:
395:
391:
208:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
135:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
50:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
565:
I decided it would be a stupid idea to go that route.
338:
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
1175:
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
96:
You have been placed on the missing wikipedians list.
330:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary
961:
Knowledge:Long-term abuse/The abominable Wiki troll
945:
Knowledge:Long-term abuse/The abominable Wiki troll
934:
Knowledge:Long-term abuse/The abominable Wiki troll
386:Let me add on to my case: back in December 2014,
361:is completely inappropriate application of DENY.
314:to work toward making a version that represents
354:even if you don't violate the three-revert rule
453:And exactly what made you change your stance?
1198:Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
1050:, which I had pointed you to multiple times?
262:article to put it, and I will do so. Thanks,
8:
627:In response to your request for arbitration
875:So, why hasn't anyone created the RfC yet?
1078:
675:Situation regarding suckpuppets of Diva206
194:Hello, Electricburst1996. Voting in the
121:Hello, Electricburst1996. Voting in the
36:Hello, Electricburst1996. Voting in the
390:removed the original entry, as shown
7:
1092:2019 Arbitration Committee elections
493:Should we take this whole ordeal to
197:2018 Arbitration Committee elections
124:2017 Arbitration Committee elections
39:2016 Arbitration Committee elections
1075:ArbCom 2019 election voter message
629:List of music considered the worst
181:ArbCom 2018 election voter message
108:ArbCom 2017 election voter message
14:
1163:"Template:Uw-error4im" listed at
1170:
1082:
939:
406:, you brought up concerns about
186:
113:
28:
1179:. The discussion will occur at
1130:and submit your choices on the
343:âespecially if you violate the
320:the bold, revert, discuss cycle
231:and submit your choices on the
158:and submit your choices on the
1:
1230:17:05, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
1154:00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
1109:Knowledge arbitration process
247:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
210:Knowledge arbitration process
137:Knowledge arbitration process
89:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
52:Knowledge arbitration process
633:Knowledge:Dispute resolution
174:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
1069:18:13, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
1022:16:24, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
1002:12:35, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
973:23:51, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
910:00:53, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
894:00:46, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
864:00:29, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
845:00:09, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
814:00:08, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
798:23:35, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
768:23:34, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
751:23:29, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
716:23:23, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
694:13:46, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
73:and submit your choices on
1245:
1193:19:38, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
1146:MediaWiki message delivery
239:MediaWiki message delivery
166:MediaWiki message delivery
81:MediaWiki message delivery
71:the candidates' statements
1040:within the article itself
978:Sock tagging IP userpages
1165:Redirects for discussion
1144:to your user talk page.
1042:. Did you actually read
669:19:34, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
650:00:30, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
617:10:59, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
595:03:54, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
584:03:50, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
560:03:49, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
533:01:48, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
516:00:49, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
489:00:43, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
472:00:38, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
449:00:29, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
433:23:48, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
373:23:21, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
289:15:04, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
955:and please be sure to
303:
1105:Arbitration Committee
1089:Hello! Voting in the
601:Please stop with the
302:
206:Arbitration Committee
133:Arbitration Committee
48:Arbitration Committee
21:ArbCom Elections 2016
1177:Template:Uw-error4im
340:blocked from editing
990:even more. Thanks,
623:Arbitration request
102:Missing wikipedians
1121:arbitration policy
957:sign your comments
932:MfD nomination of
686:RareButterflyDoors
679:Just to be clear,
328:dispute resolution
304:
257:: Hacking Incident
222:arbitration policy
149:arbitration policy
64:arbitration policy
23:: Voting now open!
1204:Electricburst1996
1160:
1159:
400:Another IP editor
345:three-revert rule
1236:
1228:
1227:
1225:
1174:
1143:
1086:
1079:
1059:
1054:
1037:inline citations
1034:
995:
943:
907:
902:
884:
879:
874:
861:
856:
835:
830:
824:
811:
806:
788:
783:
778:
765:
760:
741:
736:
727:
713:
708:
661:Familyguysofunny
647:
643:
614:
609:
593:
574:
569:
558:
530:
525:
506:
501:
486:
481:
462:
457:
446:
441:
423:
418:
385:
370:
365:
279:
274:
190:
117:
32:
1244:
1243:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1223:
1221:
1219:
1208:AutoWikiBrowser
1200:
1168:
1137:
1077:
1067:
1057:
1052:
1028:
1009:
1007:Re: August 2019
991:
980:
937:
905:
900:
892:
882:
877:
868:
859:
854:
843:
833:
828:
818:
809:
804:
796:
786:
781:
772:
763:
758:
749:
739:
734:
721:
711:
706:
701:
677:
657:
645:
636:
625:
612:
607:
603:WP:FORUMSHOPing
589:
582:
572:
567:
554:
551:
549:Admin incidents
528:
523:
514:
504:
499:
484:
479:
470:
460:
455:
444:
439:
431:
421:
416:
379:
368:
363:
332:page protection
297:
287:
277:
272:
259:
255:Cartoon Network
251:
250:
191:
183:
178:
177:
118:
110:
98:
93:
92:
76:the voting page
33:
25:
12:
11:
5:
1242:
1240:
1199:
1196:
1167:
1161:
1158:
1157:
1128:the candidates
1098:eligible users
1087:
1076:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1061:
1008:
1005:
979:
976:
936:
930:
929:
928:
927:
926:
925:
924:
923:
922:
921:
920:
919:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
886:
837:
790:
743:
700:
697:
676:
673:
656:
655:Adding Sources
653:
624:
621:
620:
619:
599:
598:
597:
576:
550:
547:
546:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
508:
464:
425:
296:
293:
292:
291:
281:
258:
252:
229:the candidates
192:
185:
184:
182:
179:
156:the candidates
119:
112:
111:
109:
106:
97:
94:
34:
27:
26:
24:
18:
16:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1241:
1232:
1231:
1226:
1218:. Thank you!
1217:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1197:
1195:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1173:
1166:
1162:
1156:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1141:
1135:
1134:
1129:
1124:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1100:
1099:
1094:
1093:
1088:
1085:
1081:
1080:
1074:
1070:
1065:
1060:
1055:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1038:
1032:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1006:
1004:
1003:
999:
994:
989:
985:
977:
975:
974:
970:
966:
962:
958:
954:
950:
946:
942:
935:
931:
911:
908:
903:
897:
896:
895:
890:
885:
880:
872:
867:
866:
865:
862:
857:
850:
849:
848:
847:
846:
841:
836:
831:
822:
817:
816:
815:
812:
807:
801:
800:
799:
794:
789:
784:
776:
771:
770:
769:
766:
761:
754:
753:
752:
747:
742:
737:
731:
725:
720:
719:
718:
717:
714:
709:
698:
696:
695:
691:
687:
682:
674:
672:
670:
666:
662:
654:
652:
651:
648:
642:
641:
634:
630:
622:
618:
615:
610:
604:
600:
596:
592:
587:
586:
585:
580:
575:
570:
564:
563:
562:
561:
557:
548:
534:
531:
526:
519:
518:
517:
512:
507:
502:
496:
492:
491:
490:
487:
482:
475:
474:
473:
468:
463:
458:
452:
451:
450:
447:
442:
436:
435:
434:
429:
424:
419:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
383:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
371:
366:
357:
355:
350:
346:
342:
341:
335:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
301:
294:
290:
285:
280:
275:
269:
268:
267:
265:
256:
253:
249:
248:
244:
240:
236:
235:
230:
225:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
202:
199:
198:
189:
180:
176:
175:
171:
167:
163:
162:
157:
152:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
129:
126:
125:
116:
107:
105:
103:
95:
91:
90:
86:
82:
78:
77:
72:
67:
65:
61:
57:
53:
49:
44:
41:
40:
31:
22:
19:
17:
1203:
1201:
1169:
1131:
1125:
1102:
1096:
1090:
1039:
1036:
1031:Anthonyg3281
1014:Anthonyg3281
1010:
993:stwalkerster
983:
981:
938:
901:Sergecross73
871:Sergecross73
855:Sergecross73
821:Sergecross73
805:Sergecross73
775:Sergecross73
759:Sergecross73
724:Sergecross73
707:Sergecross73
702:
680:
678:
658:
639:
626:
608:Sergecross73
552:
524:Sergecross73
480:Sergecross73
440:Sergecross73
387:
382:Sergecross73
364:Sergecross73
359:
358:
353:
337:
336:
305:
260:
232:
226:
203:
195:
193:
159:
153:
130:
122:
120:
99:
74:
68:
45:
37:
35:
15:
1224:MusikBot II
1216:WP:PERM/AWB
1133:voting page
699:August 2019
591:WKMN? Later
556:WKMN? Later
324:noticeboard
234:voting page
161:voting page
1117:topic bans
984:especially
965:Praxidicae
852:long ago.
218:topic bans
145:topic bans
60:topic bans
1212:CheckPage
1113:site bans
1048:WP:INCITE
1044:WP:BURDEN
988:feed them
408:WP:FRINGE
316:consensus
312:talk page
214:site bans
141:site bans
56:site bans
1053:Electric
996:(sock |
949:deletion
878:Electric
829:Electric
782:Electric
735:Electric
568:Electric
500:Electric
456:Electric
417:Electric
352:warringâ
326:or seek
308:edit war
295:May 2019
273:Electric
264:HappyINC
1140:NoACEMM
730:WP:DENY
412:WP:NPOV
349:reverts
1202:Hello
1185:Bsherr
906:msg me
860:msg me
810:msg me
764:msg me
712:msg me
613:msg me
529:msg me
495:WP:DRN
485:msg me
445:msg me
369:msg me
1058:Burst
883:Burst
834:Burst
802:Yes.
787:Burst
740:Burst
573:Burst
505:Burst
461:Burst
422:Burst
278:Burst
1189:talk
1150:talk
1103:The
1064:Zaps
1046:and
1018:talk
998:talk
969:talk
889:Zaps
840:Zaps
793:Zaps
746:Zaps
690:talk
665:talk
638:brad
579:Zaps
511:Zaps
467:Zaps
428:Zaps
410:and
396:here
392:here
284:Zaps
243:talk
204:The
170:talk
131:The
85:talk
46:The
388:you
334:.
1220:â
1191:)
1152:)
1142:}}
1138:{{
1115:,
1024:)
1020:)
1000:)
971:)
692:)
671:)
667:)
646:đ
398:.
266:.
245:)
237:.
216:,
172:)
164:.
143:,
87:)
79:.
58:,
1187:(
1148:(
1066:)
1062:(
1033::
1029:@
1016:(
967:(
891:)
887:(
873::
869:@
842:)
838:(
823::
819:@
795:)
791:(
777::
773:@
748:)
744:(
726::
722:@
688:(
681:I
663:(
640:v
581:)
577:(
513:)
509:(
469:)
465:(
430:)
426:(
384::
380:@
286:)
282:(
241:(
168:(
83:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
