553:
280:. Please look at the sources. Please also look at the article body that that the lead section is supposed to be summarizing. The claim that the film is the "fourth" appears to be original research, an overly specific interpretation of vague sources. It is also irrelevant, being first might be noteworthy but being fourth is not.
414:
Hi ! You just moved the page of one of my draft "Human
Reproduction Program -UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction" to "World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction".
312:
The filmmakers are making very specific claims that don't really hold up. They might even believe it themselves but that doesn't make it true, they can only claim to be first in a very small specific way ("major legacy"?), that doesn't make sense when you look at it more closely, and most sources
415:
However, the second name is incorect and do not correspond to the actual name of the programme. I tried to revert it but it seems i'm not allowed to do so. If there is an absolute need for a shorter name, it could go by "Human reproduction
Programme - HRP".
313:
point out plenty of counterpoints. An encyclopedia does not need to take self aggrandizing claims at face value even if they were technically true. It seems other editors poked holes in that claim and we ended up with the
475:
598:
317:
original research nonsense claiming it was somehow "fourth" which then simply isn't noteworthy. I realize you were editing in good faith, I would encourage you to be more skeptical about
Hollywood claims. --
482:
is underway to repair the citations damaged by the script. I and several other users have !voted that the script be deleted or disabled, and I wouldn't recommend using it at all unless you thoroughly check
97:
582:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
567:
172:
Yes, I'm just saying that there's no point in reporting to SPI - the global lock means it can no longer be used here, or on any other
Wikimedia project - it's been dealt with.
474:
Just a friendly heads-up in case you weren't already aware, since it's installed on your common.js: Careless use of
ReferenceExpander has caused serious problems. It's
439:
479:
73:
376:
38:
531:
in progress for the
Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers.
79:
621:
367:. I don't think the other editor's changes count as "obvious vandalism", a 3RR exemption. Just in case, you might consider self-reverting.
319:
284:
134:
across all projects, so no action needs to be taken against it here. The tag on its userpage notes that, and you can also check the
487:
reference it modifies against the previous revision. If you're interested in a more detailed explanation of the script's issues,
101:
617:
24:
372:
260:
68:
591:
603:
59:
276:
This is not a difference of opinion, the facts do not support the flawed text. The claim is not sourced, it can and
92:
349:
110:
438:, the article name is too long to fit naturally onto Knowledge. Short names are accepted as per the example of
368:
446:, both are correct, however one is much shorter and easier to type, read, and search. Going any shorter fails
191:
Except for meta but I think the reasoning is so they can still appeal their glock on their talk page there. ―
323:
288:
226:
Yep. But I think that's the only reason why the gblock doesn't prevent them from editing things on meta. ―
216:
181:
147:
131:
579:
536:
345:
344:
in your edit summary and kept your mention of heavy-hit majority after your opinion changed. Thanks.
232:
197:
416:
420:
49:
341:
115:
64:
561:
504:
451:
447:
435:
391:
299:
208:
173:
159:
139:
45:
20:
610:
575:
528:
277:
270:
112:
590:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
532:
227:
192:
135:
450:
and therefore can't be used. This is the best compromise that fits all of the criteria.
587:
503:
It always failed to work for me, so I'm going to disable it for now until it is fixed.
387:
390:
is followed, since I had actually stopped at the 3rd revert to follow the guidelines.
256:
Please stop restoring broken text unless you are actively fixing it and providing the
583:
364:
443:
314:
552:
283:
I welcome constructive changes to improve the article and move things forward. --
114:
494:
298:
I decided to stop chasing after it after you provided information about it.
625:
540:
516:
497:
463:
424:
403:
380:
353:
327:
307:
292:
237:
221:
202:
186:
167:
152:
594:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
571:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
431:
340:
I got a tad bit confused by your comment, because you have linked to
607:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
489:
597:
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
565:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All
116:
15:
158:
That is one of the main reasons why I tried to revert it.
130:
Hi - this account is not blocked here, but it is already
578:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
207:
Appealing their g-lock? Good luck with that one... ;)
493:has provided an excellent summary at the MFD. —
440:State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations
27:, where you can send them messages and comments.
8:
252:Restoring broken text is not constructive.
234:
199:
523:Charles III requested move discussion
7:
562:2023 Arbitration Committee elections
546:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
386:I know, but I was making sure that
14:
551:
39:Click here to start a new topic.
601:and submit your choices on the
238:18:49, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
222:18:46, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
203:18:15, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
187:17:34, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
168:16:08, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
153:15:49, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
1:
626:00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
580:Knowledge arbitration process
529:new requested move discussion
354:21:15, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
36:Put new text under old text.
328:14:35, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
308:14:19, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
293:14:18, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
44:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
644:
618:MediaWiki message delivery
541:05:52, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
464:16:39, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
425:16:09, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
404:14:51, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
381:14:48, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
74:Be welcoming to newcomers
615:to your user talk page.
517:08:24, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
498:05:17, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
303:
163:
480:a large cleanup project
363:You just passed 3RR at
126:Bikrookanpurgangster15
69:avoid personal attacks
576:Arbitration Committee
559:Hello! Voting in the
271:the article talk page
261:Clarification needed
369:Firefangledfeathers
592:arbitration policy
80:dispute resolution
41:
628:
470:ReferenceExpander
442:being changed to
278:should be removed
123:
122:
60:Assume good faith
37:
635:
616:
614:
555:
514:
509:
492:
476:currently at MFD
461:
456:
401:
396:
265:
259:
214:
211:
179:
176:
145:
142:
117:
16:
643:
642:
638:
637:
636:
634:
633:
632:
631:
630:
608:
556:
548:
525:
510:
505:
488:
472:
457:
452:
412:
397:
392:
361:
338:
263:
257:
254:
236:
235:Blaze Wolf#6545
219:
212:
209:
201:
200:Blaze Wolf#6545
184:
177:
174:
150:
143:
140:
132:globally locked
128:
119:
118:
113:
86:
85:
55:
12:
11:
5:
641:
639:
599:the candidates
568:eligible users
557:
550:
549:
547:
544:
524:
521:
520:
519:
471:
468:
467:
466:
411:
408:
407:
406:
360:
357:
337:
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
253:
250:
249:
248:
247:
246:
245:
244:
243:
242:
241:
240:
217:
182:
148:
136:global account
127:
124:
121:
120:
111:
109:
108:
105:
104:
88:
87:
84:
83:
76:
71:
62:
56:
54:
53:
42:
33:
32:
29:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
640:
629:
627:
623:
619:
612:
606:
605:
600:
595:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
572:
570:
569:
564:
563:
554:
545:
543:
542:
538:
534:
530:
522:
518:
515:
513:
508:
502:
501:
500:
499:
496:
491:
486:
481:
477:
469:
465:
462:
460:
455:
449:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
428:
427:
426:
422:
418:
409:
405:
402:
400:
395:
389:
385:
384:
383:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
365:Nicholas Wade
358:
356:
355:
351:
347:
343:
335:
329:
325:
321:
320:109.76.205.64
316:
311:
310:
309:
305:
301:
297:
296:
295:
294:
290:
286:
285:109.76.205.64
281:
279:
274:
272:
267:
262:
251:
239:
233:
231:
230:
225:
224:
223:
220:
215:
206:
205:
204:
198:
196:
195:
190:
189:
188:
185:
180:
171:
170:
169:
165:
161:
157:
156:
155:
154:
151:
146:
137:
133:
125:
107:
106:
103:
99:
96:
94:
90:
89:
81:
77:
75:
72:
70:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
51:
47:
46:Learn to edit
43:
40:
35:
34:
31:
30:
26:
22:
18:
17:
602:
596:
573:
566:
560:
558:
526:
511:
506:
484:
473:
458:
453:
444:Rhode Island
413:
398:
393:
362:
339:
300:ElusiveTaker
282:
275:
269:Please read
268:
255:
228:
193:
160:ElusiveTaker
129:
91:
21:ElusiveTaker
604:voting page
527:There is a
410:Moved draft
342:WP:MINORITY
588:topic bans
533:Rreagan007
448:WP:PRECISE
436:WP:CONCISE
229:Blaze Wolf
194:Blaze Wolf
584:site bans
490:Folly Mox
417:GuydeBerg
346:Ayıntaplı
336:Confusion
218:(blether)
183:(blether)
149:(blether)
82:if needed
65:Be polite
25:talk page
377:contribs
359:Heads up
93:Archives
50:get help
19:This is
611:NoACEMM
507:Elusive
454:Elusive
430:As per
394:Elusive
388:WP:NPOV
138:. Best
478:, and
432:MOS:AT
213:Summit
178:Summit
144:Summit
512:Taker
485:every
459:Taker
399:Taker
315:WP:OR
210:Girth
175:Girth
141:Girth
98:Index
78:Seek
622:talk
574:The
537:talk
495:SamX
434:and
421:talk
373:talk
350:talk
324:talk
304:talk
289:talk
164:talk
67:and
273:.
266:.
23:'s
624:)
613:}}
609:{{
586:,
539:)
423:)
379:)
375:/
352:)
326:)
306:)
291:)
264:}}
258:{{
166:)
100:,
48:;
620:(
535:(
419:(
371:(
348:(
322:(
302:(
287:(
162:(
102:1
95::
52:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.