Knowledge

User talk:EmonyRanger

Source ๐Ÿ“

237:. The original editor was blocked by Bbb23. If the editor's comments were inappropriate and needed redacting or removal I could understand but neither is the case, their submission is being refactored, having the effect of hiding it, when it's relevant to the edtior's appeal of his block. Neither Nomoskedasticity nor Bbb23 has the right as you say to "touch anyone else's ", unless necessary - and this is unnecessary. I am not the bad actor here but if I am blocked for this so be it. 265: 24: 336: 89:
here looms large. The characterization of a seven-year-old girl examining her sister's genitalia as molestation, pedophilia and sexual abuse is so absurd and disproportionate on its face, that it makes me suspect the issue *may be* over a misunderstanding (I think on your part, but again, I've barely
108:
Hi, I have read the talk page for the article and your sandbox. My feeling is that the talk page discussion is (was) productive and the history shows no evidence of edit warring (that I could find). I would suggest politely implementing one of the suggestions on the talk page you feel you agree most
56:
I'm having an problem with long-term behavior by an editor on an article I attempted to edit. I posted my complaint to the Administrators notice board but retracted it when I was informed it was not the proper venue. I have duplicated my complaint
76:
Hi EmonyRanger. When you have a content dispute, the first place to go is to the article's talk page. I see there's already some discussion there. If consensus from those who appear there cannot be reached, then a post to the
94:, it must be included, when a dialectic of sources, if examined to provide due weight to such a claim, would result in that sources characterization not being included at all, or being given much shorter shrift.-- 127:
Thank you both for your responses. I didn't un-revert my many compromise attempts in order to avoid edit warring. I will try a request for comment.
78: 392: 297: 43: 281: 380: 293: 154: 344: 272: 99: 363: 358: 354: 114: 376: 289: 109:
with and taking it from there. If you really get stuck, consider a request for comment. Hope that helps!
230: 173: 150: 149:
I'm amazed you're edit-warring over that BLPN thing. If you do it again you'll pay a visit to 3RRN.
85:
are options. Mind you, I've only taken the merest glance at what's going on, but I think the issue of
95: 208:
Last warning. You may remove or hat or strike your comments, but you may not touch anyone else's.
224: 211: 110: 47: 386: 379:. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may 303: 238: 195: 128: 86: 62: 30: 194:
I'm sorry but administrative action by you in this area would be extremely innappropriate.
400: 317: 264: 185: 61:
Can you tell me what board would handle such issues or how best to resolve them? Thanks.
285: 372: 177: 82: 23: 396: 313: 234: 181: 58: 229:
You misunderstand. I'm restoring another editor's submission, moved first by
292:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may 404: 321: 246: 217: 203: 189: 158: 136: 118: 103: 70: 335: 169: 371:, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans 330: 18: 263: 35: 90:
looked) that just because you can find a source that
300:, then adding the following text below this notice: 42:, contact the responding user(s) directly on their 288:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to 33:has been answered. If you need more help, you can 375:. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to 8: 34: 176:, there's no need to take EmonyRanger to 79:Knowledge:Dispute resolution noticeboard 16:Here's my talk page, give me a chat! 7: 391:below. However, you should read the 357:. Note that multiple accounts are 14: 334: 22: 180:. I'll deal with it. Thanks.-- 1: 349:from editing for a period of 276:from editing for a period of 46:, or consider visiting the 423: 405:14:36, 27 April 2015 (UTC) 373:may be reverted or deleted 322:23:14, 26 April 2015 (UTC) 247:22:50, 26 April 2015 (UTC) 218:22:38, 26 April 2015 (UTC) 204:22:34, 26 April 2015 (UTC) 190:21:24, 26 April 2015 (UTC) 159:21:22, 26 April 2015 (UTC) 137:00:44, 23 April 2015 (UTC) 119:00:36, 23 April 2015 (UTC) 104:23:06, 22 April 2015 (UTC) 71:22:26, 22 April 2015 (UTC) 393:guide to appealing blocks 377:make useful contributions 298:guide to appealing blocks 290:make useful contributions 389:|Your reason here ~~~~}} 242: 199: 132: 66: 168:to you on my Talk page 343:This account has been 268: 361:, but using them for 308:Your reason here ~~~~ 296:by first reading the 267: 37:ask another question 383:by adding the text 83:request for comment 282:disruptive editing 269: 81:, or initiating a 410: 409: 381:appeal this block 294:appeal this block 117:how to improve!) 54: 53: 39:on your talk page 414: 390: 338: 331: 311: 284:, as you did at 231:Nomoskedasticity 228: 216: 214: 174:Nomoskedasticity 151:Nomoskedasticity 41: 26: 19: 422: 421: 417: 416: 415: 413: 412: 411: 384: 329: 324: 301: 280:for persistent 261: 222: 212: 209: 164:Please read my 147: 96:Fuhghettaboutit 12: 11: 5: 420: 418: 408: 407: 339: 328: 325: 270:You have been 262: 260: 257: 256: 255: 254: 253: 252: 251: 250: 249: 233:then again by 146: 143: 142: 141: 140: 139: 122: 121: 111:Happy Squirrel 106: 92:says something 52: 51: 44:user talk page 27: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 419: 406: 402: 398: 394: 388: 382: 378: 374: 370: 366: 365: 360: 356: 355:sock puppetry 352: 348: 347: 346: 340: 337: 333: 332: 326: 323: 319: 315: 309: 305: 299: 295: 291: 287: 283: 279: 275: 274: 266: 258: 248: 244: 240: 236: 232: 226: 225:FreeRangeFrog 221: 220: 219: 215: 213:FreeRangeFrog 207: 206: 205: 201: 197: 193: 192: 191: 187: 183: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 162: 161: 160: 156: 152: 144: 138: 134: 130: 126: 125: 124: 123: 120: 116: 112: 107: 105: 101: 97: 93: 88: 84: 80: 75: 74: 73: 72: 68: 64: 60: 49: 45: 40: 38: 32: 28: 25: 21: 20: 17: 368: 364:illegitimate 362: 350: 342: 341: 307: 277: 271: 165: 148: 91: 55: 36: 31:help request 15: 239:EmonyRanger 196:EmonyRanger 129:EmonyRanger 115:let me know 63:EmonyRanger 259:April 2015 351:one month 327:New block 367:reasons 306:|reason= 278:24 hours 113:(Please 48:Teahouse 395:first. 387:unblock 359:allowed 345:blocked 304:unblock 286:WP:BLPN 273:blocked 166:warning 369:is not 178:WP:AN3 87:weight 397:Bbb23 314:Bbb23 235:Bbb23 182:Bbb23 59:here. 29:This 401:talk 353:for 318:talk 243:talk 200:talk 186:talk 170:here 155:talk 133:talk 100:talk 67:talk 312:. 145:3RR 403:) 385:{{ 320:) 310:}} 302:{{ 245:) 202:) 188:) 172:. 157:) 135:) 102:) 69:) 399:( 316:( 241:( 227:: 223:@ 210:ยง 198:( 184:( 153:( 131:( 98:( 65:( 50:.

Index

check-mark
help request
ask another question on your talk page
user talk page
Teahouse
here.
EmonyRanger
talk
22:26, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Knowledge:Dispute resolution noticeboard
request for comment
weight
Fuhghettaboutit
talk
23:06, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Happy Squirrel
let me know
00:36, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
EmonyRanger
talk
00:44, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Nomoskedasticity
talk
21:22, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
here
Nomoskedasticity
WP:AN3
Bbb23
talk
21:24, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

โ†‘