User talk:Enok - Knowledge (XXG)

1346:. Look up old content and if you think the bulk of it is usable but not properly readable from an external cache, let us know, myself and any other admin can fish it back out of the deleted revision storage. However, you should not copy and paste it verbatim, because they would now appear under your name, so that would be claiming authorship over something you didn't actually write yourself (the old text license allows for copying, but not without basic attribution). You should also avoid paraphrasing the same factoids from the old text without your own verification, because the banned user has had a tendency to write articles that weren't policy-compliant (this seems to have particularly applied to irredentism-related articles), which was obviously a contributing factor to them becoming a banned user. It's best if you try to verify the same references and then reconstruct the articles from that - that way you're sure there are both no copyright issues and no referencing issues. -- 2162:) Scrivo in italiano cosi facciamo prima e ci capiamo meglio...il problema è che tu hai rimosso delle parti importanti che sarebbe più utile tenere 1) gli Opici appartenevano al gruppo dei Latino-Falisci come dice la stessa fonte (Devoto) indicata nella bibliografia , non capisco perchè tu rimuova sempre questo passo 2) La teoria che collega i primi Romani con le Terramare è piuttosto "vetusta" e il fatto che nessun insediamento delle Terramare sia stato rinveuto al di sotto della Pianura Padana è un dato di fatto , tu hai rimosso anche questo (perche?) 3) Perchè cancelli le fonti che inserisco ? ad esempio quella in lingua tedesca (è valida, le fonti non devono essere necessariamente in inglese) nel quale vengono citati i più importanti siti protovillanoviani tra cui Tropea, Timmari-Matera, Milazzo etc.. che avevo elencato nella voce . Visto il numero ridotto direi che non è proprio il caso di cancellare le poche fonti presenti. Ciao-- 1276:

violating the 3RR policy. Don't shoot yourself in the feet while you two are discussing, it doesn't make it easier for the discussion to move in the right direction as you've also created a kind of bad faith towards the other person despite your best effort at communicating with the other person. Who is to say that he isn't trying his best to talk to you? Try to understand that. FWIW, I've asked Bill to walk away to cool off (you should probably do the same too!) and he has promised me not to meddle in that article page again until he has done so. In this time, he won't be interacting with you anymore and I urge you not to poke anymore (per this observation →

3744:, verrebbe fatto di dire...), ma che nel campo della storia è un'eccellenza. Inoltre avevo rimosso la struttura a paragrafi perché davvero troppo pesante (sì, se stessi continuando a modificare l'intera pagina, non solo distruggere quanto scritto da me, te ne accorgeresti). Se poi non ti va di dirmelo e credi che la tua versione è migliore e che io non sono figlio di Maria e non sono figlio di Gesù, be', buon divertimento, davvero. Vatti ad azzuffare con quegli altri che ho mandato affanculo poco fa, magari fate amicizia. -- 3961: 4527: 3861: 3335: 4385: 3227: 860:. Others may judge you more summarily than I right now, given your recent edit history. You don't want that. Nor do I. Please just do not edit the article at all until we have given consensus-reaching a fair try. I ask you this for the sake of the quality that you have provided and I know you are still trying to provide to WP. Let's just calmly, civilly, dispassionately proceed, okay? :) 2293:), if you're willing to remove what's been written because of its copy-and-past nature (which, at the present moment, is not even wreaking any trouble), then write a new piece of article which is capable to express equal meaning to the other staff that you want to handle with. You can't just revert to the previous state of the page, which is quite flawed and problematic as well. -- 3511: 1763: 4179: 4147:

than your earlier unwarranted large-scale deletions. I am concerned about your attitude toward the material and your unwillingness to discuss why you do not wish to see anything about the actions around Pont Saint-Louis in the article. despite extensive sourcing from multiple references in French and English that constitute the major authorities on the subject.

4544:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 3880:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1837: 4238: 2911: 2177:

Pigorini); 3) Ho semplicemente ripristinato la mia versione, dato che tu hai annullato completamente le mie modifiche (non ho nemmeno visto se avevi fatto nuove aggiunte). Invece di annullare tutte le mie modifiche, sistema solo quello che reputi opportuno. Io mica ho annullato di netto tutti i tuoi contributi.--

4248:

regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about

1416:

Should really mention the fact that it largely consists of "third-tier" powers who are opposed to permanent SC membership for "second-tier" powers in their region -- i.e. Argentina with respect to Brazil, South Korea with respect to Japan, Italy with respect to Germany, Pakistan with respect to India

812:

could easily get blocked again for that if you persist. We will sort it all out in the article once we have discussed the issue thoroughly and arrived at a consensus on the talk page. Please do not make any further changes to that page, no matter what changes are made for now or who makes them. It

32:

In risposta alla tua domanda, nel caso dei Rangers Football Club hai perfettamente ragione e suggerirei il singolare, visto che "Club" è il sostantivo. Però nel caso in cui venga usato solo "Rangers" invece che dell'intero nome (cioè senza "FC"), allora il plurale è corretto. Spesso questa confusione

2855:

to you "are you unaware that an Italian cuisine restaurant located in American is referred to as an Italian restaurant -- that it reflects not its location or place of incorporation, but rather its cuisine?" I already listed many of your (dozens?) of deletions -- which list you have now removed. I

1930:

I reinserted the technical and historical data that have been deleted. This information is known internationally as well as being present in the books of university mechanical engineering and magazines. This information is documented by authoritative sources. Furthermore, this information is present

997:

I put those sections in yesterday as part of the comments I made to that talk page while you were on your block. I tried to structure the sections to best facilitate discussion about the points I made in those comments, and for ease-of-editing and reading the content of those section. They were my

937:

though seemed deliberate alterations of some of my own signed contributions to that talk page. Now, I have not reverted those changes yet because I'm not sure if they might not actually improve the structure of that page and the setting of that discussion. Still, I wanted to call your attention to

4146:

edit you crossed into edit-warring, removing the specific reference and the material while once again claiming it was "unsourced." It is well-sourced, possibly differing in a specific number from seven to nine, but I don't see this as something that is central to the subject, and far less important

3433:

Please do not accuse me of something false, it's childish. The sources provided are obsolete as I told you and as you probably already knew. The article has been updated and it's far more informative now. I beg you for the last time to avoid any kind of vandalism toward the article or I will report

2949:

If you want to take issue with the general definition of "Italian cuisine" as used in the category description, you can do so on the category talk page, I suppose. I'm not going to pick bones over what is "genuinely" Italian and what isn't; that's silly. At any rate, your position is parochial but,

1275:

Note that when you report someone on ANI, you inadvertently created an atmosphere where people from all walks of life would come in to scrutinise you and the party you have reported. What I can see is you two edit warring on that article page and for which the two of you could have been blocked for

164:

Scusami, ma ci sono pagine come quella sulla US Navy e molte altre che nonostante la pagina sui soli gradi hanno anche una sezione apposita, non vedo cosa ci sia di male, il template WIP è presente, stasera quando torno dal lavoro finisco le modifiche che già per la sola sezione degli ufficiali mi

1598:

article. This map does not describe the Roman conquests in Italy, but the extension with time of the territory covered by the word "Italia". with this term was meant at the beginning today's Calabria, and then the "covered" territory moved north, until including the whole peninsula under Augustus.

772:

WikiDao is exactly right. The block means you are barred from from editing any pages except for your account's talk page. Editing other pages via another account or an IP address is the sort of conduct that can result in lengthy blocks or even indefinite bans. I accept your comments above, your

709:

if they engage in disruptive behavior during the block (repeatedly posting repetitive {unblock} requests, posting personal attacks or other egregiously incivil material, continuing the same policy violations or conduct issues that led to the original block, etc.). Blocked editors may also (again,

4093:

If you have a source that presents the events at Pont Saint Louis differently than Kauffmann and Mary have it, please provide it. I'm open to the notion that the French account may be exaggerated, but don't removed plainly and properly sourced content claiming that it's not sourced. We don't cite

3434:

this.. behaviour. Italians ancestry counts up to 140 millions and I remind you that I am not your personal teacher, just google it yourself and you will hopefully put and end to your ignorance. Send your answer to my talk page so that I am aware of your reply. if not I won't answer you anymore. --

3394:

Hello, I noticed you keep changing the shape of the "Italians" article bringing it back to an obsolete version of it. I beg you to stop these interventions and leave it in its current and updated form, of which I am the original author. If you have any good reason of why you prefer an old version

2377:

Sorry if I offended you, but there are facts and there are opinions. I respect the latter. I also read the discussions above and I noticed how almost all of participants were completely ignorant on the subject (there is nothing wrong with not knowing every subject of human knowledge). Anyway, the

2724:

Enok, you should really answer this question. None of those edits were explained in the slightest, and I don't see how they're productive. I reverted a few myself and will probably do a few more. I see plenty of problems on your talk page, and we can't have so many of these edits with no word of

3770:

I do not understand your apodictic "This article only includes States after the dissolution of the Roman Empire". Normally the scope of an article is suggested by its title, and by the scope of the references used, and not private knowledge of selected editors who then are forced to convey that

2611:

are just a few). Could you please step back and look how you have been acting towards others with whom you are having disagreements with? You have been presented with facts that bolster counter arguments to your claims, and you have been resorting to name calling and insults instead of actively

2176:

1) Gli Opici appartenevano al gruppo dei Latino-Falisci, ma nella stessa frase ci sono anche gli Enotri che non lo sono, ergo si può tralasciare di specificarlo; 2) sarà anche un'opinione "vetusta", ma devi riportare una fonte per fare un'affermazione simile (per ora c'è solo la versione di

1614:

Dear Enok, I don't know where do you come from, but I can advice only one thing: go and read a secondary school book about History. There you will find WHEN the Romans conquered Calabria, and when, for example, Etruria. Maybe then you will have clearer ideas about the map. Bye,

2794:

This is one example of your mass removals of cats, that appear appropriate, from many, many articles. Without any explanation. Even after one has been requested -- despite the fact that you returned to editing after the question was posed as to why you are engaging in this

1153:

Thanks for replying to this. The problem with your edit was that the US/German hostilities before December 1941 were not an issue in the Arctic convoys, which ran between Britain and the Soviet Union, and with which the US took no part prior to their entry into the war. It

1177:

It talks about the Lend Lease program and the convoys to the USSR which clashed with the Germans (probably in the Norwegian Sea). In my opinion, however, even if they had fought in the Pacific or in the Mediterranean, would not be a bad idea to mention it in that

3410:

I reverted your disruptive edits. According to sources provided, there are 119 million Italians (including ancestry). I remind you that Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia based on the sources; if you want to say that Italians are 140 million, you have to bring a

3708:) secondo il tuo gusto ANCHE le sezioni successive, quelle che io non ho toccato?! Cioè, io ho cambiato profondamente la struttura di una pagina (di cui conosciamo entrambi lo stato originario) per una porzione, tu ti limiti a modificare secondo il tuo gusto la 2896: 2892: 773:

ready admission, and the fact that you have ceased editing the page as proof that you were honestly unaware of this issue. I also note that you did tone down your comments after committing to do so, and I trust that you won't edit outside of the block again.--

1009:

I do not have a problem with you, Enok. I know you care a lot about the quality of this article. I am trying to help you resolve a dispute that has severely disrupted constructive editing of that article. All that I am asking is that you try to remain as

4397:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

1306:

him or I would have given way to understand this? I've always been more than courteous, even in the face of his... little good-faith. Are you sure you have read that discussion, or you're limited to reading this talk page? Yes, I am now a bit ironic.

3716:

su quanto altri hanno faticato molto a fare? DAI, FINISCI LA PAGINA! Ci sono tantissimi edit da fare, vuoi proprio dedicarti a quell'articolo, a quella singola sezione di cui ci si era già occupati? Non so se ho ben reso il concetto. Ma credo di sì.

2316:

several times with comments like "none of those are noodles", "Please, check what is a noodles. Not all pasta is like spaghetti". There has been a lot of discussion about noodles vs pasta and there has not yet been a clear consensus established (see

2917:. It's as I said above. Next time you have an "as far as I am concerned, I am right and the world is wrong" moment -- please don't follow it up by deleting entries in dozens of articles that accord with the view of the world (but not your view).-- 3361:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

2950:

more importantly, your removals were first of all unexplained, second of all occurred in huge numbers, third are opposed by other editors. So you can call their "decisions" inaccurate, but the fact remains that the edits are disruptive. As for

3766:

It is always difficult to keep these list articles sensible and encyclopedic. Mostly they attract randomness and bad judgement. I tried to salvage it, but I would also be ready to agree to just submit it for deletion as unsalvageable.

2598:

I have been staying out of this conversation as much as possible, but your edits regarding this subject has become disruptive. Additionally, you have been violating several policies and standards of Knowledge (XXG) for several days now

1064:

I restored the original structure to the talk page because on consideration your changes did not seem to improve upon the purpose I intended for that structure (ie., clarity and ease of further discussion). I hope you are not going to

2447:

There is no consensus about the merging of the templates "pasta" and "noodless", and there is no consensus about the deleting of the template "noodles". My question is still valid: why have you included pasta in the template of the

2553:"I based my categorization of noodle on other dependable sources written by experts on the subject, such as Principles of Cereal Science and Technology by R. Carl Hoseney which states on page 327 that "Noodles are a type of pasta". 813:

will all work out in the end, trust me. And I would prefer to have your involvement in that process for the sake of the quality of that article, which I know you have put quite a lot of work into already. Okay? Easy does it. :)

2696:

And are you unaware that an Italian cuisine restaurant located in American is referred to as an Italian restaurant -- that it reflects not its location or place of incorporation, but rather its cuisine? As in the very name of

1516:

was balanced. For example, the last line was about islands, with a Sicilian and two Sardinian, in order to represent whole Italy. Feel free to add more, but not to remove any of them if already present, as Gramsci and Deledda.

1757:

The kind of mass censorship of referenced material you just did is simply unacceptable; I thought you've been here long enough to know that... I remember you from an interaction regarding Brunodam; please don't turn into him.

2129:

Read the bibliography , the informations that you are deleting are well explained in the book of Devoto-Gli antichi Italici...they are not my inventions .ps I have not deleted nothing , I've just added some improvements and

470:

I couldn't even add the footnote the way i wanted as it wouldn't let me place it next to the reserve, so now is next to the name, and it is small, there are 19 other countries with notes just like russia so its fair game.

4121:. As I've stated, I am open to the notion that the French actions may be a little exaggerated, but everything there came from hard sources. Please reconsider your approach, it appears to be unjustifiably aggressive. 4425: 247:

Thanks, but those soilders are out of military age, so 2,400,000 is the current amount ready, but I understand your reasoning. The USA and Russia stats are going to be kept the way they are, as their websites tell

3365:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

400:

Read it. "This is an extraction of a no-copyrighted work, The reserve policies of nations: a comparative analysis, by Richard Weitz and published by the Strategic Studies Institute. You can read the full text in

4340:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1774:-related articles in a disruptive way. If you engage in further inappropriate behaviour in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article/topic ban. Thank you. 2340:

Please, I beg you to inform yourself about the topics you intend to deal with. The difference between pasta and noodles is obvious to anyone who has some experience of cooking. We can continue the discussion

2757:

Are you mocking Drmies? Or playing dumb? Read the first sentence, above, at the beginning of the string. For that matter, read the question in the second sentence, as well. I'm not sure how you could miss

3779: 2363:- "I beg you to inform yourself about the topics you intend to deal with" is not good manners. I respect your view on these matters but there are many editors here whose views we must also respect. Thanks! 526:

I have that seen the source. It does not say that Paramilitary forces are reserve forces. Paramilitary force is something else and reserve force is some thing else. What is the issue with you? Off course

2825:

Your English is letting you down. Look at the text of a few of the articles, and at the sources. "Italian restaurant" refers to the cuisine, in English usage. Some of the articles even helpfully link to

4409:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1285: 3569:. I would like for you to open up a discussion regarding what ever it is you two are disagreeing about (I'll add my opinion) so we can improve the article and end all the reverting. Kind regards, 3732:

Ahhh, se per una volta ci mettessimo d'accordo, noialtri, al posto di stare sempre a scannarci tra di noi mentre fuori sghignazzano! Okay, dunque. Ti va di dirmi cosa c'è di così sbagliato nella

3358: 3154: 2515:, for example: "noodle, a cooked egg-and-flour paste prominent in European and Asian cuisine, generally distinguished from pasta by its elongated, ribbonlike form." For instance, do you think 2830:. (And that would be "specializing in" in idiomatic English, if it weren't for the fact that that's what the term means. I've reverted the rest of your category removals and wording changes. 2546: 2474: 2322: 3818: 2318: 1795:

I've rolled back your changes exactly because they're unexplained - "Ragusa was a Latin republic" is not an explanation for that action. If you want to argue this, use the fine talk page -

1217:

You also appear to be involved in what is referred to as a "slow edit war" on a template - even though the reverts are not within the same 24 hr period, it can still lead to a block. Read

3150: 1915:

Please read my post on the AnsaldoBreda talk page. I partially agree the section can be reduced; but the rolling stock and history sections should be reduced much much much more urgently.

1073:

with me about this, Enok. There's no need. Please leave the sections I started as-is; you are of course welcome to structure your own different set of sections on that page if you want.

3814: 1897: 4117:

If you keep removing sourced material while making claims that it isn't sourced and without providing your own sources that the sources are incorrect, I will take the issue up at the

90:

All these games, (Arsenal of Democracy, Darkest Hour, Iron Cross are under the Hearts of Iron banner. Iron Cross is a direct expansion however. --Will 01:16, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

3696:

Scusami tanto, ma davvero, con L'INTERA lista tutta da RIFARE, perdi tempo a rollbackare (senza alcun criterio, a mio personalissimo avviso) i MIEI edit, le modifiche che ho fatto

998:

contributions. You may have improved upon them on that talk page, I haven't really considered it yet, but it was nevertheless an action on your part that is frowned upon by

1629:

Bravo Enok, thanks! No problem, everyone (me too :-)) makes mistakes. Sorry for what I wrote, but when I attended school for such a mistake there was the death penalty. :-)

1343: 1199: 2218: 3100:

Regarding the title coloring, I created the current version of the template and when I did, I did it wrong. I am basically fixing my mistake. Please do not revert this. --

160:

Sorry to talk in English but I do in this way in order to be understood, Work in progress template is present, there are many oters world navy pages with rank structures.

2991:

By that logic, every Mexican restaurant or Chinese restaurant that is located in the U.S. is an "American restaurant". And 313 million Americans would disagree with you.

1302:

My English is not the best, I know, (in fact my contribution to Knowledge (XXG) is limited to the insertion of data and sources), but in what circumstances I would have

2612:

discussing the issues. This is not a very good way to interact with others, and I would ask that you work with other editors to work out any disagreements over content.

2214: 2262:

and warned the IP, but you are also warned about edit-warring, even if it's slow. I want to force the IP to discuss their edits on the talkpage, please do the same.

232:

Can you provide me a DIRECT link to your source, because those numbers that you are providing are very strange and doesn't match indivisual wikipedia military pages.

1327:

I noticed you resurrected several of the articles I recently deleted, with much of the old content. I wonder where are you finding it, and could you use any help? --

842:

has nothing to do with the dispute about Pakistan, but I restored a vandalism that had escaped in the confusion. Please, do not be prejudiced against me. Thanks. --

1931:

in the Italian wiki. I understand the criticism for the mistakes, I do not understand the desire to highlight errors only and do not insert positive information.--

1767: 2003: 1472: 3775: 1999: 1468: 4484:

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with

2557:

So now, here on your talk page with these three quotes, we have shown that there is no consensus. I ask you again to undo your edits to the noodle template.

1046:. I simply included the subsection "Third opinion etc" in the section "Pakistani armed forces" being part of it. Okay? (I do not know why you directed me to 4294: 4063: 4018: 3929: 3828: 3666: 3347: 3138: 2489:

and other similar dough/flour paste products, while also stating that pasta is of Italian origin alone (meaning that noodle is the all-encompassing group)."

2228: 2066: 2013: 1727: 1674: 1482: 289: 4245: 605:

IP or user account. I highly recommend that you do not persist. I look forward to hearing from you when your block expires later today. (If you did

2811:

How an Ohio restaurant can be Italian? At best, it is an American restaurant specialized in Italo-American cuisine. The category name is a misnomer.--

4556: 3892: 3620: 3290: 2877:

As far as I'm concerned, "Gargiulo's" and similar restaurants are American restaurants, not Italian at all, but I accept your inaccurate decisions.--

1861: 1554:

And then put in the Deledda. I repeat that it is much more serious if you remove biographies of living people (they are only three): you can put in

510:

also mentioned about reserve troops of Pakistani Military, though figures are not mentioned. Please be careful while reverting sourced material. --

326:

Not only is it reliable, it is MORE Reliable, it is the Russian intelligence agency themselves. You book is from a think tank that is non russian.

2056: 3593:

Stop arbitrarily delete 8 sources! What you need sources ??? No one had come up with her mother Azerbaijani origin!!! She gave an interview!!!

2052: 4290: 4059: 4014: 3925: 3824: 3662: 3146: 3134: 2224: 2062: 2009: 1723: 1670: 1478: 946:" So please keep in mind that it can come across as a bit rude for you to make such changes without a civil explanation given, even if they 721: 582: 557: 495: 3518: 3499: 1891: 4439: 4365: 4187: 3806: 3745: 3718: 3456:

The sources become obsolete when they are replaced by newer sources. I suggest you to read this page to learn how Knowledge (XXG) works:

3038:

This behavior has to stop. Period. Based upon this and many, many, many other warnings you have received, I am going to take this to the

2325:). Could I ask you to revert your edits to the noodle template and rather go to the discussion page to express your concerns? Thank you! 186:

Who here is saying that the Royal Navy page should be taken as a model? The US Navy page is too long, what about the oters navy pages? --

3600: 610: 106: 4190:

without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Knowledge (XXG) with an accurate

3712:

porzione, e allora, cioè, dai... Perché non finisci il resto, se sei tanto ansioso di darci la tua visione delle cose? Perché lavorare

3127:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

3656: 1717: 1664: 1159: 639: 3294: 1869: 720:

I would leave my comments above up at least until your block expires. I would also wait before commenting further on the dispute at

1536:. Ok for one, but it would be best to remove biographies of living people as Valentino Rossi or Umberto Eco, rather than Calvino. -- 2863:-- where you did the same thing. You have three editors here questioning your activity. In dozens? of articles. Kindly revert.-- 944:

Editing another editor's signed talk page comments is generally frowned upon, even if the edit merely corrects spelling or grammar.

556:

is not mentioned in it. It doesn't means that there is no force of Kosovo. For this purpose other reliable sources are provided in

83: 17: 3652: 3484:

Ciao Enok, I am not happy with that number either, but the problem is another. Please read what I wrote in the talk page. Thanks,

2621:

Please be forewarned that if you continue with these sort of actions, you will be reported to the appropriate message board(s). --

1713: 1660: 800:

Enok, now that your block for edit-warring has expired and you are permitted to edit freely again, let me caution you again about

86:. Also, Arsenal of Democracy and Darkest Hour, are related games using the same engine, timeperiod. Should at least be mentioned. 3760: 1970:

Hi again. I have responded to your response. I am not sure you had fully understood that I did really think about your concern.--

1864:

to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources:

184:

Chi dice che la pagina della Royal Navy è da prendere come modello? la pagina sulla US Navy è già lunga, che mi dice sulle altre?

4435: 4361: 3974: 1873: 4501: 4418: 3821:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3659:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2433:

Please read more carefully: "The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:33, 6 October 2013 (UTC)"

2221:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2059:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2006:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1720:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1667:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1475:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4287:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4056:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4011:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3922:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3269: 3131:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2848: 2698: 1234: 1147: 535:

but it doesn't means that there no reserve force of Pakistan. This reserve force is mentioned at other reliable sources like

498:

again and again. I have provided reference for my contribution which are not unreliable sources. If you see the last line of

342: 306: 4540:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 3876:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 3282: 3238: 3216: 1532:

Should not be "based" on regionalism, but must remain representative. Sorry but Gramsci has a huge reputation in the world,

3395:

please post it in the talk section of the article so that we can discuss of which is better for the readers, thank you. --

3111: 3075: 3053: 2891:

The cat describes what is within it. It states it is "Category for restaurants serving Italian cuisine." Similarly, see

2672: 2632: 536: 499: 4545: 3881: 3286: 2907: 1599:

The problem is that also the name on the picture is wrong, and should be corrected. I hope that now the matter is clear.

3780:

List of historic states entirely or partially in Umbria between the conquest of the Lombard kingdom and the Italian Wars

3704:

a Knowledge (XXG), perché non finisci l'opera DA ME iniziata e prosegui (intendo, anche modificando tutto come vuoi tu,

540: 507: 4352:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

3771:

information via edit summaries? I find this a rather novel approach to managing content divisions on Knowledge (XXG).

3351: 2787: 1857: 902:

No, right, that edit in itself does not seem too problematic. Just be careful. I'm glad we understand each other. :)

4430: 4357: 4194:. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the 2206: 1567: 366:

Did you even read it? It is published by the strategic services institute. The article is an excerpt. It is reliable.

41:, infatti, le squadre sportive negli Stati Uniti vengono sempre chiamate per il plurale. Spero di essere stato utile! 3128: 4536: 3872: 1879: 710:

subject to the caveats noted) still communicate with other editors by email, including the blocking administrator."

4279:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

4048:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3999:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3914:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3805:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3643:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2205:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2043:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1990:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1975: 1960: 1704:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1651:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3457: 137:

when editing articles. This helps other editors. It can be very short, like "roman num" or "no src". Please read

3342: 3326: 3234: 3220: 2860: 2782: 2298: 1841: 3566: 2289:

I beg you not to start a useless edit war, please. Knowledge (XXG) doesn't work that way. As I've already said (

4262: 3749: 3722: 3066: 2404: 666:

Yes, I'm Enok. I just canceled some vandalism (which you have restored). I never expected to break the rules.--

4406: 2144:

I have not removed any information, but I just corrected some sentences. Please, don't delete all my edits. --

3604: 87: 3915: 3578: 3562: 2931:

American restaurateurs who call their restaurants as "Italian". What a surprise. Next time you tell me that

1559: 1207: 856:

Still, Enok, I recommend you do nothing that looks in any way contentious or as if you may be continuing to

213: 191: 170: 119: 102: 3596: 3083: 1885: 1845: 1066: 939: 330: 294: 94: 21: 4250: 3985: 3489: 3177: 2359:

I ask you to give courtesy to the other editors and read the discussions above. Please also look again at

1991: 1822: 1634: 1620: 1604: 1460: 1445: 561: 491: 4353: 3298: 2360: 2844:

What Yngvadottir said. I don't understand your exclamation of confusion. Is it faux? I already above

2835: 1971: 1956: 1410: 571: 553: 517: 82:

Well, first in the Expansions section of HOI2, Iron Cross has been announced to be a expansion to HOI2.

4493: 1853: 1844:, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Knowledge (XXG)'s 806:

editing the article in any way right now that might be interpreted as disruptive or belligerent. You

4207: 4199: 4156: 4130: 4103: 2922: 2868: 2801: 2763: 2714: 2294: 2271: 208:

Ho già chiesto io il parere di 1 admin, sei pregato di attendere, ripristino per l'ennesima volta. --

4393: 4375: 4329: 4320: 4195: 3435: 3396: 3251:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be

1070: 4254: 3791: 3439: 3400: 3185: 1575: 1541: 1522: 713: 52: 4402: 4349: 4333: 4469: 4459: 4280: 4049: 3570: 3377: 3312: 2951: 2932: 2654:

restoring removed articles - seems like I'm the only one who cares about the content of the edits

2342: 2259: 1464: 1422: 1222: 1203: 780: 476: 448: 410: 371: 338: 302: 288:

I found the solution to part of our problem. those 20,000,000 in russia are POTENTIAL reservits.

271: 253: 237: 209: 187: 166: 115: 98: 2658: 2600: 1849: 1047: 1011: 84:

http://www.paradoxplaza.com/news/2010/9/paradox-interactive-announce-iron-cross-and-darkest-hour

4512: 4310: 4226: 4191: 4079: 4034: 3981: 3945: 3900: 3844: 3682: 3485: 3265: 3206: 3107: 3049: 2955: 2900: 2781:; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Knowledge (XXG) again, as you did at 2668: 2628: 2244: 2082: 2029: 1936: 1920: 1743: 1690: 1630: 1616: 1600: 1498: 1441: 1125: 1087: 1028: 964: 916: 874: 827: 746: 656: 627: 73: 4414: 4345: 4337: 4198:. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on 1955:

my thoughts in more detail on the article talkpage. Can you have a look please and respond?--

1277: 4221:

The article are proven by many authoritative sources. All sources very evident and proven.

4000: 3967: 3960: 3539: 2963: 2831: 2734: 2562: 2502: 2438: 2368: 2330: 1770:, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing 1555: 1167: 565: 511: 146: 38: 4473: 4417:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4410: 4348:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4341: 4118: 3783: 3252: 3039: 2729:

such edits until this has been handled satisfactorily, or you might be blocked. Thank you.

2604: 1796: 1218: 4564: 4203: 4183: 4150: 4124: 4097: 3189: 2918: 2864: 2827: 2797: 2759: 2710: 2512: 2394: 2313: 2265: 1563: 1533: 950:

happen to improve in some way upon someone else's signed comments on talk pages. Thanks.

34: 4541: 3877: 3700:, l'impostazione a quella "pagina" (?), da me datale?! Scusami, ma se hai tanta ANSIA di 2897:"The Mozza Cookbook: Recipes from Los Angeles's Favorite Italian Restaurant and Pizzeria" 2608: 1281: 999: 857: 266:

I am keeping USA and russia military where they are, I won't change the others you made.

2390:

template & use it for all the pasta products & related subjects and merging the

1819:

Hi Enok, I am looking for volunteers to re-create the link below for all 196 countries.

1198:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at

3787: 2384: 2167: 2135: 2101: 2044: 1571: 1537: 1518: 1437: 43: 1038:

I directed you on that page because you obviously do not know the difference between "

4301: