User talk:Engine Gone Loco

1536:

impersonates another person; or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. ".

552:), BH are marketing partners for new films and they get paid for publishing over-the-top figures for increasing the buzz and in the end Boxoffice collections. Proof - the site's appearance, had it taken promotional duty from films the site would have looked like Manhattan and by now reached the top. Now I understand your frustration Boxoffice collection reports low collections for the film you love! Sometimes I do get irritated at this too but I just leave to others then! If its any consolation 1932:

politically correct with the people in power, and the attempt was to remove the Hindustan times reference all together as the reference had no details of the Dera's relief team doing any work in Darjeeling, this was a mobile edit which did not allow for full screen functionality and hampered editing which made it difficult to edit, which caused making comments on the change to be quite a challenge. Mobile edits are tagged as such in the history, as is past editing records with comments.

655:) who might have been around when the consensus took place. Be pretty sure that you have a valid reasoning for changing the consensus and read those two links I gave you or otherwise be ready to be panned by editors since they will be god-damn angry if in the end they realise their time got wasted. You might also lose your reputation as an editor. Since your talking about updated figures, the figures of Chennai Express and OUATIMD get updated weekly. 1895:{{cite web|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/WestBengal/Devastating-fire-breaks-out-in-Darjeeling-market/Article1-843339.aspx |title=Archived copy |accessdate=20 April 2012 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120422230736/http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/WestBengal/Devastating-fire-breaks-out-in-Darjeeling-market/Article1-843339.aspx |archivedate=22 April 2012 }}</ref: --> 743: 1386: 18: 2107: 2032: 1959: 1778: 434: 1301: 797: 366: 1852:

of yours do not appear constructive to me. You removed content without providing explanations, and in one case your edits corrupted a Hindustan Times reference, removing not only the bulk of the original URL, but links to the archived version as well. Sloppy editing is disruptive. Please explain your

1868:

Hi, a little eye for details of checking the references shows that they are not related to the claims made, there is no detail give for the claim "this is the highest selling album". Further social service related claims have references that make no mention of the service provided by the Dera- those

1100:

I have said I did not know the negative connotations of the word, and since you mentioned it ( after blocking) there has been no attempt to justify it or argue that I am right in doing so, my only point has been that if you had posted the explanation upfront in your first post, there would have been

1160:

I have asked for a name change and I have not argued about keeping the name since the explanation was posted and yet you continue to attempt to discuss the issue as if I am trying to retain the name, as well as are trying to make loaded statements- I am not "claiming" that I did not know about the

989:

I did not know Injun is a derogatory term, I though wikipedia also states "assume good faith", you could have explained how the term can be misconstrued before looking at a block, but like I said, I guess you have the rights and will use them the way you feel fit, rules and guidelines are obviously

1931:

There were no references given to the date of start of the disaster relief program, it was just a claim, further cow slaughter is not quite a "social service" in the context of humans being lynched in India over eating beef, so no it does not quite serve as social service but more an attempt to be

1061:

the math is pretty simple. If, after you chose a n acceptable new username and are unblocked you would like to lobby for your right to change back to a username containing an obvious racial slur that you claim you were somehow ignorant of you are welcome to do that at he appropriate noticeboard.

1891:, and a butchered Hindustan Times reference that came out of your changes. You removed a detail about when his disaster relief program was established, and his anti-cow slaughter stance. Both would be intuitive aspects of a section on Social work. As for the reference, your changes turned this: 543:

a few years ago Box-Office India was chosen by the editors then to be the primary source for BO Collections in India. Box-officeindia.com might lack the shine and shimmer of some others out there but it actually provides some accurate figures. The reason for saying so - Box office India has no

1535:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Injun Gone Loco". The reason given for Injun Gone Loco's block is: " Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane; threatens, attacks or

1971:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2044:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1909:"A little eye for details" would presumably have prevented this. Please double-check your work, and please use edit summaries to explain your changes so that other editors understand your rationale for the changes you've made. This is common practice for editors. Thank you. 1130:

On top of it edits were made assuming motives and even now the comments above are suggesting even more actions which I have not even talked about, that and the edit summary comment( ok lets play that game) are made showing that there is no attempt to assume good

930:

is Spanish for "crazy." Knowing that, I am sure you could see how your name seems more likely to actually mean "Native American gone crazy" than "engine gone locomotive." What an unfortunate misunderstanding, I am glad we had this opportunity to resolve it.

1790:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

1056:

If one weighs the possibility of slightly inconveniencing you by requiring you to select a new username that does not contain a racial slur against the offense your username would cause to millions of people from the dozens of cultures making up the

477:

As pointed out on your talk page, it is a referenced addition, not vandalism, and you have removed sourced material and that is more akin to vandalism, please discuss why you are removing the content if you have issues with what I am adding.

868:. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page. 1030:

meaning in the English language, and that meaning is in fact a highly offensive racial slur. How you came up with that particular word without having any idea what it its one and only meaning is is somewhat hard for me to

760:

I am extending the courtesy of offering to discuss this since you have been here a while, but I have to tell you this name is simply not acceptable. We do not allow anyone to use racial slurs in their usernames here.

1688:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 2150: 2072: 1999: 1818: 818:

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved

651:. The discussion at my talk page is not the real consensus. To be true I don't know where it is. Your point seems to be valid and I support it to a fair extent. Contact an experienced editor for eg. ( 2134:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2056:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1983:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1802:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 214: 1022:

Normally block appeals are reviewed by a separate admin than the one who issued the block. If you are looking for a rule that backs up this particular administrative action I would direct you to

210: 601:

I share your concern. I too think that that Boxoffice India is not that well as source but what can we do? Its an established norm. See when I was a new user I posed this query too! See -

2120: 750:

because it contains a racial slur. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a

1161:

negativity of the word, I am "saying" it and there is no action I have done that can lead anyone to believe anything else, and there is no reason for you to suggest so.

324: 1206: 320: 1853:

changes by using edit summaries and please double-check your work by clicking Show preview and Show changes before committing your changes to articles. Thank you.

990:

for the ones without rights.I have put in the change of username format too, are you not supposed to do the unblocking to allow me to move for a username change ?

1202: 1101:

no discussions and it would have been a resolution and not a unilateral enforcement, blocking was not required, and it would have wasted less of everyone's time.

949:"We" -there is only unilaterism at work here- this is not resolution and there is no we, I see throwing one's weight around is not restricted to the real world. 1488: 1430: 126: 65: 271: 963:

You are welcome to post an unblock request if you feel you are being treated unfairly. Details on how to do so are included in the block notice above.

1742: 1642: 1597: 1269: 1216: 711: 334: 281: 267: 224: 701: 613:

for the change in consensus you talked about, if you come up with a good point against Box-office India I'll be the person with you in the matter.

492:

How many times I have to tell you? boxofficedaycollection IS AN UNRELIABLE SOURCE. And if you don't listen, you're surely going to the admins. ----

202: 697: 1482: 1425: 120: 60: 1738: 1638: 1593: 1265: 1212: 707: 330: 277: 220: 1259: 2172: 2086: 2013: 1832: 1713: 1255: 1058: 647:

Injun Gone Loco, not for once I said that Pleasant (Now:Jionpedia) was right and by number of edit counts I was referring to you as a

781:

There is no race mentioned here, what slur ? There is a play on the words Engine and Locomotive, where did race come into this ?

2168: 2082: 2009: 1828: 1709: 1262:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1209:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 704:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 327:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 274:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 217:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1735:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1635:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1590:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1512: 1444: 144: 79: 814:

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below) and continue editing.

1494: 605:. To this an experienced user told me the same thing I told you but did'nt reasoned it well but I got what he meant. Read 2143: 2065: 1992: 1811: 1500: 132: 1700:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

2155: 2077: 2004: 1823: 1705: 883: 751: 658: 633: 616: 602: 590: 164: 29: 922:

I suppose there is an extreme outside chance that you honestly had no idea. In that case I would inform you that "

1166: 1023: 995: 954: 807: 786: 747: 519: 483: 451: 312: 25: 1194: 832: 755: 33: 1727:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1627:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1582:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1246:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1193:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

688:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

311:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

254:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

201:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1888: 1325:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

882:

try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see

837: 580:

Pleasant you should have used disruptive editing instead. Nevermind mate your still one of the best. Best -

389:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

179: 1628: 501: 465: 1348:

an old age home, and moved back to her son's residence after the issue became a controversy. <ref: -->

2131: 2053: 1980: 1933: 1914: 1870: 1858: 1799: 1546: 1404: 109: 39: 514:

You never did point it out, you just posted a vandalism message, gave no explanations for the reverts

1567: 1367: 1162: 1067: 991: 968: 950: 936: 912: 782: 767: 515: 479: 418: 1339:

many live performances. Thought towards then end of his life they did not live together <ref: -->

1701: 1583: 1393: 855: 540: 442: 553: 446: 255: 169: 746:

Welcome to Knowledge. I noticed that your username, "Injun Gone Loco", may not meet Knowledge's

2114: 2040: 1967: 1786: 1768: 1758: 1677: 1668: 1658: 1613: 1285: 1232: 875: 727: 494: 458: 350: 297: 240: 2162: 2127: 2049: 1976: 1910: 1854: 1795: 1697: 1681: 1541: 1421: 1345:

cite news | url=http://www.panchamonline.com/articles/rddemise.htm | title = when the beats

898: 56: 2142:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2064:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1991:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1810:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1696:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1564: 1363: 1359: 1305: 1063: 964: 932: 908: 763: 689: 549: 545: 414: 370: 206: 874:

Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check

802:

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Knowledge because your username,

408:

cite news|url=http://www.rajrewal.in/projects/exhibition-hall-nations.htm/,</ref: -->

2139: 2061: 1988: 1807: 1693: 1685: 865: 820: 652: 610: 402:

better known projects are the Hall of Nations at the ] Exhibhition Centre,,<ref: -->

871:

At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.

2135: 2057: 1984: 1803: 1749: