Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:English4Truth

Source đź“ť

95:. The problem is that you checked the "This is a minor edit" box. In Wikiparlance, "minor" edits have to be absolutely uncontroversial: correcting obvious misspellings, fixing obvious formatting errors, and the like. Any edit that any editor, anywhere, at any time, might disagree with should not be marked as minor. This is discussed at 106:
At this stage in your editing career, it's probably best to ignore the existence of the minor-edits box. I've got over 20,000 edits in my own history, and I doubt that I've used the box on as many as a hundred of them. I personally don't think it would hurt Knowledge (XXG) at all if they completely
102:
The problem is that some editors have their watchlists set to exclude minor edits. To such an editor, your marking significant edits as minor might look like an attempt to sneak a substantive change under the radar.
60:, a helpful place for new users, if you have any questions. I see you have wikipedia e-mail enabled for this account, so I suppose you might as well stick with it. Good luck! 19:
It is appropriate that he recognised on Knowledge (XXG), as he has been selected to stand in the 2016 Police Commissioner Elections for the second time in May 2016
50:
I created English Truth (without an e-mail address) and tried to log in again, and it would not let me - so I created another users account - English4Truth
82:
Greetings, O English4Truth! I hope I'm not overwhelming you with Wikipolicy, but you've committed an unintended solecism in two of your recent edits to
35:
that you have commented on? It looks like you might be. Which of the accounts do you prefer to use going forward? Please reply below.
16:
Steve Uncles has been politically active in the English Democrats for 12 years and has secured over 100,000 votes.
99:—but as a new editor, you probably don't want to add another to the list of policy pages that you have to read. 28: 57: 112: 32: 65: 40: 96: 83: 86:, and I'd like to let you know so that you won't unwittingly antagonize your fellow editors. 108: 56:
Yes, I don't blame you, it can be overwhelming for new users. You might want to visit the
61: 36: 116: 107:
eliminated the minor-edit distinction; but that's one editor's opinion... —
68: 43: 27:
Hi, English4Truth, welcome to Knowledge (XXG). Are you the same person as
53:- I am new to this so do find it all rather over administrative ! 93: 90: 8: 7: 14: 1: 117:15:58, 30 August 2015 (UTC) 69:19:08, 28 August 2015 (UTC) 44:17:28, 28 August 2015 (UTC) 132: 78:Edits, minor and otherwise 31:, who created the article 89:The edits are these: 29:User:English Truth 84:English Democrats 123: 131: 130: 126: 125: 124: 122: 121: 120: 80: 25: 12: 11: 5: 129: 127: 79: 76: 75: 74: 73: 72: 51: 24: 21: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 128: 119: 118: 114: 110: 104: 100: 98: 94: 91: 87: 85: 77: 70: 67: 63: 59: 55: 54: 52: 49: 48: 47: 45: 42: 38: 34: 30: 22: 20: 17: 105: 101: 88: 81: 33:Steve uncles 26: 18: 15: 109:Ammodramus 97:WP:MINOR 62:Bishonen 58:Teahouse 37:Bishonen 113:talk 92:and 66:talk 41:talk 115:) 64:| 46:. 39:| 23:Hi 111:( 71:.

Index

User:English Truth
Steve uncles
Bishonen
talk
17:28, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Teahouse
Bishonen
talk
19:08, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
English Democrats


WP:MINOR
Ammodramus
talk
15:58, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑