User talk:Erik/Archive 26 - Knowledge (XXG)

6113:, articles should generally be based on secondary sources, and we use primary sources to "make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts". The common example of this is using the film itself as a source for a plot summary. In this case with the genre discussion, I would not put the primary source (the official website) above secondary sources because I think genre classification is subjective. The policy says to include only objective content from primary sources. Like I said, I think it is best to defer to secondary sources that write about the film in prose and follow their lead. I think providing a few options on the talk page (I'm thinking "supernatural buddy cop film" as one possibility) so we can resolve the matter. 6574:, disambiguation terms are used to organize topics that have the same article title. It is only an incidental design of the system that in a Knowledge (XXG) article, the disambiguation term is displayed on such equal grounds with the article title of the given topic. I think the displaytitle can be used to de-emphasize the disambiguation term. It does not have to be gray, it could just be smaller than the title itself. While it was not originally designed for such use, I do not think that should prevent attempts to reuse features in new ways. Text formatting and table coding have been used for new purposes in presenting information. A new approach has to start somewhere. 5827:, I see what you're saying. The problem is that to go ahead and list all the names defeats the purpose of the film infobox—to summarize information. I think we can do better than a laundry list of names, to use a different rule of thumb that can make sense here. It could be the top four names especially since Lofland is a no-name actor, or the top four names in the "Cast" section. I think some reviews pretty much name these latter four as the general stars in the movie, but I'll have to check. Do you think there's a way to bring down the number of names in a way that makes sense for this film? 846:. Not sure why we should be following the on-top edits of a User blocked for his extreme xenonymophobic views. Was mentioning this nonsense only this morning with a Romanian editor following an attempt to Britishize a Romanian feminist writer. It's just very old and very tiring, and even more tiring now that (the odd Romanian case excepted) its so totally focussed on Vietnamese (which is what Labattblueboy meant, Vietnamese are the exception to the way we treat other Latin alphabet foreigners). I just wish someone would have a go at 2867: 1013:

controller - an agent for the Reds: "Why don't you pass the time by playing a little solitaire?" When he comes upon the Queen of Diamonds, she is unexpectedly called away and takes the card as a precaution. Jocelyn, however, finds Raymond in the study and is reunited with him - she is coincidentally (and improbably!) dressed as the Queen of Diamonds - the most appealing costume possible for him! After embracing, they depart to elope, and leave behind her card costume.

4207:

do you think it's possible that we have grounds to shut it down under the guideline I cited in the RM (do not have multiple requests on one page)? I'm not entirely sure of that guideline's remit, but it could prove helpful as a last resort... All of this pales into insignificance when you look at the number of new contributors putting in their tuppence to both the new RM, and the results of the old one. I feel a bit like an old man shouting "get of my lawn!"

451:

In general, "Accolades" is the most appropriate catch-all term, but "Awards" can still work if everything under it are really awards. Examples of non-award accolades would be something like being on AFI's Top 100. I would say not to press the issue and work on other aspects of the article. If there are additional disputes, start a discussion on the film article's talk page. I've watchlisted the article so I can weigh in. Hope you've been well! :)

5887: 31: 2698: 4516: 1855:

collaborations mean that people put American/French/Canadian/Spanish in the lead sentence. That becomes meaningless junk. As for talking with other editors, remember to focus on the content whenever possible, even to the point of overlooking personal barbs. And don't forget to relax in the editing process; some weak wording lingering in a Knowledge (XXG) article for a short time is not the end of the world. :)

3096:(I was going to put this on your talk page, but I saw that you commented here.) Hi, Anthony. Regarding your comment at WT:FILM, I'm unfortunately hard-pressed to commit to a collaboration. I've tried a few times with other members of WikiProject Film, but the collaborative spirit just isn't there. Our preferences and interests are just too different most of the time. One time, I planned to collaborate on the 2605: 2133: 4833: 3620: 1663: 1009:

dressed with a tall stove-pipe hat and fake beard as Abe Lincoln. He excuses his desecration: "It's all right, it's Polish caviar." Mrs. Shaw, who appears as Little Bo Peep (or Mother Goose?), reaches out with her long staff and pulls his arm - an apt metaphor for her controlling nature. Raymond, who is costumed as a Spanish gaucho, is extremely nervous about meeting his long-lost girlfriend.

3540:, for example. I admit that the community is not quite consistent with what wording to put in the template, but if that concise wording is okay for the film poster in a Featured Article, it can be reused. Also, I thought that guidelines recommend resizing poster images to 300 pixels wide when uploading, but I cannot find mention of that right now. I suppose you're okay in that regard! 2788: 2728: 2922: 1901: 1604: 5761:

you. Again, I'm very sorry for being so disrespectful, but I was really angry and I just had to take it out on someone, and you were unfortunately the one caught in the heat ray. I'm real sorry and I feel ashamed, I should know much better. If you'll ever forgive me, I'll be very happy. Thanks Erik-- sorry for all of that and thanks for your support. :)

3160:, but there is something to shoot for. For what it's worth, the more appropriate film articles for you may be those not really covered in books, but more in periodicals like film journals of those of related subject matter. (EDIT: I say this because I can retrieve electronic copies and send them to you, as I've done in the past with some other editors.) 6497:, which isn't good for Knowledge (XXG) nor the MPAA. I'm wondering if you might have time to look at what I've proposed and, if okay, move it over into the article? If you have feedback and it's minor, could I suggest moving the draft over into the article and then work on making adjustments, in order to get the plagiarism issues resolved? Thanks! 3039:, so I can see some value in identifying them. As for actors in the last paragraph, there are blue links, so there could be some value there. There's no obvious cutoff when it comes to identifying cast members, but it may be more appropriate here because there are numerous adaptations with the same characters being recast repeatedly. 6172:

insufficient for determining the genre. For example, if the official website said one genre but all secondary sources say it is this other genre, then we would follow the latter per Knowledge (XXG)'s policy. We need to build a local consensus based on how secondary sources describe the film when reporting on it.

5661:

should remain is because two films already exist, with a third confirmed by Josh Hutcheson, saying he's filming it Late 2013/Early 2014. What is the point in deleting it anyway? There is no harm in letting it continue to exist, seen as two films exist and a third is in pre-production. Just let it be,

4206:

Hopefully. Until then, we just have to deal with the flood of new editors and IP contributors. Interestingly, I've suggested to the RM instigator multiple times (in both the RM, and on his talk page) that he should withdraw the request, but he hasn't heeded my advice. If the Admins can't do anything,

563:

Okay then. Thanks. It's always thoughtful if I seek your opinion about this matter since I was only trying to help the IP understand certain rules and explain my motives and come up with a basic compromise as well, even though the IP says that he has been here for 6-7 years and says that he knows the

4728:

if you want additional opinions. However, I recommend writing notices neutrally. I don't think there was a need to mention the block; the focus can be on the content. Is there a valid argument or not for using quotation marks? That's all that needs to be asked, and we can put aside editorial conduct

3464:

I just commented at the AfD! :) Ah, familiar territory for us, isn't it? I think it comes back to not clearly defining the topic. It's not art (in being a work of fiction), and it's not quite history because the coverage is in anticipation of art as part of the news cycle. I recall us disagreeing on

2337:

I've messaged MisterShiney. In the meantime, let's not edit the "Top Critics" scores out of film articles. There's no rush to get the content off Knowledge (XXG). :) Let's go through with the WT:FILM discussion and see what everybody says. Sometimes if you run into resistance, it's good to just stop

1854:

I don't know what you think is so funny. Sometimes it's possible for an editor to get caught up in the rules; it happens to me too. The guidelines try to advise for the majority of circumstances, but we have to figure out how to best apply them. This is not an uncommon occurrence; some multinational

1276:

and any related articles, which would cause his username to be considered promotional. The difference between him and Emma, though, was that he was up-front about it, took the time to read and understand Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines, intended to abide by them, and treat his COI seriously,

999:

Raymond's vicious, overly-smothering mother - sitting next to a bust of Lincoln and in front of a fireplace portrait of Lincoln - sabotages his relationship and potential marriage plans with the daughter of one of his step-father's political foes - she labels Jocie "a Communist tart." She interprets

3469:

as a place to merge because I think the majority of the coverage that has been done is because his name is attached. You know how I prefer to structure: starting plans out as a section under whatever was the reason for reporting (director, book, etc), and with crossing the threshold, there can be a

3262:

Hi Erik, thank you for your answer. I think that the award has an excellent notoriety... I think the sources are very reliable, and above all HitFix and Filmweb. Sources from different countries (Italy, Poland, USA, United Kingdom etc...) indicate international fame... Not only, I asked help in the

2453:

would be the first step. One does not have to involve an admin to resolve a dispute; an admin is just an editor with a few extra tools. It is really about starting dialogue, and it can be tough to accomplish that when opposing parties want the article to show or not show specific information before

532:

I personally do not think the plot summary needs much attention. Such sections are never immutable, where the other sections, once you write and expand them into strong, well-cited passages, tend to be permanent. It may help to add more content to the article body in general, especially to indicate

450:

The editor is probably referring to this passage, "Any edit that is not disputed or reverted by another editor can be assumed to have consensus," meaning that's the way it has been for a while. I don't think it really applies anyway since the article has not gotten much good attention historically.

6542:

I killed it because it is using arcane syntax features which should be only used in templates, overriding the standard enforced by Infobox film, and was only implemented in the four articles of yours out of the entire Knowledge (XXG), while it should be implemented either nowhere or everywhere for

5760:

Hello, I'm sorry for being a real jerk. I really am, I was just angry with going around the internet and finding out that Zilla's being vandalised everywhere, and discovering that someone created two Wikis trying to take down Wikizilla, and I just had very little temper and I just spewed it out on

4602:

Hi Erik, I noticed that the info box does not list the November 16, 2012 wide release date on the Lincoln (2012 film) page. Disney is a client of my employer, so while I don't edit Disney-related Knowledge (XXG) articles, I would like to propose a change to add the missing wide release date to the

3370:

Hi, George. I can provide general feedback, but unfortunately I do not have an interest in working on this topic. I'm happy to try to access any resource that may be available online but behind paywalls, but I think this is an article that needs a significant overhaul to be up to par with the most

2518:

So it has been 24 hours since the last comment (mine) was added to the "Top Critics" discussion and I am wondering how one is supposed to know when a discussion is over. Also, how is one supposed to know what the outcome of a discussion is? It looks like people contributing have just been happy to

1568:

We will have to disagree on the level of detail appropriate for the relevant sections. You may be interested in certain Wikias that exist outside of Knowledge (XXG); some of them are about fictional universe and go into a lot of detail. One of my favorites is Wookieepedia; it definitely has detail

1339:

Yes, it is a reliable source; I've referenced it before. Still, I don't think such contributions are valid because keeping them justifies their promotional efforts. Films have numerous reviews, and we can only include a sample set of them in any given article. It is best for an objective editor to

469:

Thanks for your comments and helpful advice, Erik. I have been doing very well! Also, I was concerned about the plot section as well, since I find it to be accurate, but I felt that it may need to be rewritten and I was trying to help clean up the plot summary's grammar as clearly indicated in the

113:

I accidentally uploaded an image without provoiding any copyright tags...and I am quite afraid that I will get in trouble for my mistake...since Knowledge (XXG) is very serious about image uploading. Here is the file: File:Rescue-logo.jpg If you could point me towards how to fix my mistake, then I

6048:

And I just finished cleaning it up the best I could. Looks like the director actually wrote the article so I tried to make it as NPOV as possible. There really wasn't a serious NPOV issue so I am not sure why the tag was at the top of the article in the first place (again, tags drive me CRAZY!!).

4795:

I'm no fan of template creep, but the grouping of templates are all collapsed. It's possible that a reader would skip over the collapsed DreamWorks template to see what films Rob Letterman directed. Not to mention that the DreamWorks template does not identify the films' directors either. I think

3443:

resulted in my writing the article on the film. While I still think a strong case can be made that this unmade film has enough notability to merit an article under NFF, a merge and redirect (as a searchable title) to the novel would serve the project,and I would be willing to undertake the merge.

2398:

Hi there, feel that under the neutrality of Erik, I should point out that I didn't complain, I just asked for an admin to take a look at your recent edits. Didnt call you a vandal, just asked them to take a look to see if there was justification for your edits considering that you edited an essay

1756:

Cool! Well it did twig you were into film reference material by your lists and I was wondering why nobody has done this sort of thing before. If you can add the urls to google books often half the books are viewable or the covers can be seen and they can be checked out on Amazon. Its sort of then

815:

I've dealt with foreign-language film titles that have had them, and actor/filmmaker articles to a lesser extent. I don't recall commenting on a Vietnamese-language topic before, though. Let me know if there is a difference. Labattblue seemed to indicate this, which I understand, but I think that

312:), I figured I would give a generic heads-up on these talk pages to let you know. I don't necessarily know how nominating and apportioning responsibility goes out for these sorts of things, but for what it's worth, I'll follow the review and make any amendments that the reviewer finds necessary. — 215:

Long time, no talk. :) Hope you're well. I've been informed, by Knowledge (XXG), that they're about ready to move my WORLD-FAMOUS (picture fireworks n' stuff) photo of the "Vesper cocktail" to the Wikimedia Commons. It's my photo and I took it and I wanna do it but I have no idea how to do this.

6283:

discussions because there were older requested moves that failed because some editors thought that these films "deserved" the ambiguous term of "(film)" in their titles despite lesser-known films of the same name having articles on Knowledge (XXG). Now the consensus is overwhelmingly in favor of

3074:

article. I'm not sure I understand you correctly about your offer in looking for books for the article, though. You offered to provide a list of potentially useful books for me, and to look for them for me, but the problem is, I have no idea what's in them, and what part in them I can cite, so I

5519:

Maybe. I think what we should do is discuss how the cast should be ordered in the cast section if they are in alphabetical or by appearance in the end credits. What I also suggest what we should discuss is how to discuss the issue of how we should set up the order of actors in the cast section.

3977:

You know what, I've often wondered why I see a variety of ways of phrasing the numbers and you raise a very valid point in regards to budget and gross. I think, if another user wants it that way, who am I to not let them have it? Only various films, I'll use my way, but I won't do so if there's

995:

Senator Iselin is reflected off the glass covering a portrait of Lincoln - juxtaposing the ghostly-thin, anti-Communist with a stalwart American from another era, as he fixes himself a drink. As a spineless puppet, Senator Iselin complains to his wife that he can't keep the number of Communists

919:

Erik, I see this a s serious issue. When you have a film, like Last Ounce of Courage, that has gotten nothing but terrible reviews from "professionals", but nothing but praise from audiences, how do you reflect this in articles? It seems illogical to allow the comments and aggreate ratings of

1012:

The scene in the study between Raymond and his mother begins with a close-up of a black bust of patriotic father figure Abraham Lincoln - one of many such witty image compositions and motifs in the film (visually linking Iselin to Honest Abe). Raymond's mother divulges that she is his American

1008:

The celebration opens with images of American patriotism gone mad - there is a closeup of an American flag - a hand reaches out and defaces the flag with a trowel-like shovel. It scoops up the caviar from the star pattern onto a cracker to be devoured. The hand belongs to Johnny Iselin, who is

564:"system" as well as indicated in the discussion, despite his limited command of English. On another note, I am going to add the themes section as well in the article and also, the reception section needs to be heavily rewritten as well, with box office records and commentary from film critics. 5155:

Hello, Erik. You were recently involved in a discussion on the RS noticeboard. I've been mediating this dispute, and I thought I'd let you know that one of the editors has put forward a proposed resolution. I'd just like to notify you of this opportunity to build consensus. The proposition in

1503:

Hello Erik, and thank you for your kind remark. Yes, I am both frustrated and angry. Your peers behave like ignorent idiots. I agree my contribution wasn´t at all suitable for the Plot-section, but instead of moving it to a proper section and elaborating it, they deleted it. The Alien-story's

381:

I shared my thoughts. James Bond is a different figure from superheroes since he is more defined through the films than through the comics. So I can see why the different topics seem the same. Still, I think the content should come first, and we can always regroup the content based on what is

6171:

I'm saying that facts are objective and genre classification is subjective. In most cases, the consensus among everyone (the filmmakers, the independent sources, us editors) can easily agree on a genre. Here, that's not quite the case here, so what I am saying is that the official website is

1046:

a home invasion and the plot does later revolve around them as Graham tries to get into the Tooth Fairy's head by staking out the victims' homes and going over his actions. (Also thanks for helping source the article way back; you vanished before it got promoted but your help was important).

5419:

When the ending credits are alphabetical or by appearance, then the poster and/or the title credits should be used as long as two criteria are met: these credits are not alphabetical and they do not bill a prominent actor last. Otherwise, the order should be decided through discussion.

6518:. Betty Logan and Tbhotch each have a slightly different take, so a third opinion would be helpful. If you have time, do you think you might head over there to take a look and, if what I've proposed as a solution seems reasonable, move the section over into the article? Thanks! 6269:

What do you mean by "people are searching for under Prometheus film"? The goal of disambiguation is to differentiate topics that share the same term. In the case of films, if there are two films that share the same term, they should be disambiguated from each other. The Titan

6254:

I disagree, the film is clearly the thing people are searching for under Prometheus film, not a 15 year old film that didn't have an article until today. As for the FAC, renaming the article has broken the Wikiquote and Media portals on the page which I've only just noticed.

6026:, it's not a problem. :) There are so many individual film articles on Knowledge (XXG), and it can be difficult to check the notability for the portion that seems suspect. If you ever have any film-related questions in the future, feel free to drop me a line or post at 841:

As regard the current wording of WP:DIACRITICS I'm just a bit tired of having the same conversation 100x. It's an old chestnut, every single Frenchman who gets his name Britishized on en.wp has that current wording of "WP:DIACRITICS" cited, but it's been edit-warred,

2984:). Perhaps you could do the same for the main cast members -- they could have their own side table with prose discussing them (since some characters like Cosette/Marius or the Thénardiers can be grouped). That would mean two side tables, if that's palatable at all. 920:"critics" in froma page, like Rotten Tomatos, but no comments or ratings from audiences....the only difference here is one is paid, the other is not....the opinion of one person of a film should not be more important that the opinion of 1000's or tens of 1000's. 4779:

Do you really think the template is useful navigation when 2 of the 3 films are already on another template (the DreamWorks one)? That seems like a bad case of template creep to me. Oh look, one unique link on this template, it's totally useful for navigation!

2173:, respectively, until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussions. The nominations will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussions focus on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. 6005:

Withdrawn. Thanks for pointing out the policy. I vented a little bit about notability tags so I feel a little better now. Thanks for clarification. If we had that type of communication on a regular basis, I believe that AfD consensus would be easier to reach.

3213:

It looks like a good start! I will want to check the sources for reliability to see if this award is notable. My initial impression was that it did not quite cross the threshold. I'm busy tonight but hope to weigh in this weekend. In the meantime, I recommend

1573:

fictional universe too. As for Rachaf, I'm not familiar with that matter. In any case, I hope you'll reconsider your perspective of the editors, who are like you in wanting to share knowledge with readers. There are just different methods and thresholds.

5806:

Those are the names featured on the lower portion of the poster. I don't believe it's correct to narrow the names down to the four at the top because that would result in Jacob Lofland being omitted and Lofland plays one of the film's major characters.

1195:) who have a personal name attached to their organization. That's fine as long as it's clear the name belongs to an individual. The real problem with Emma is refspamming and cluelessness about COI. If she keeps it up without discussing on talk pages or 422:

but when I tried to search for a discussion regarding a possible consensus, I unfortunately could not find any discussion about this matter. I was only trying to seek advice from other project members on how to improve the article as a whole, but I was

2107:

Erik, just a reminder that your DYK quid pro quo review is still not done, and it's been three weeks without an update on the review template. We hope to hear something from you soon there, and in any case, no later than a week from now. Many thanks.

4556:

Hi Erik! Thank you for reviewing my DYK nomination! I just wanted to let you know that I didn't respond to your comment because I was away for a couple of days and now I see that the hook was promoted yesterday without the change you suggested... ^^

3636:

regarding a pesky little I. At the end of the day, it may not have been resolved but we all did work together to try and get it sorted, even if we did feel at times we were banging our heads on our desks and calling our computer screens idiots.

2752:

Aw shucks. :) Thank you for your kind words, and it is good to be back somewhat. ("Real" life always beckons...) I've enjoyed working alongside you; I can always expect good insight from you in discussions. I wish you a festive holiday as well!

2403:

so that it reflected your views on the topic and then proceeded to make edits based on this. It was the only place that I knew of to make admins aware of edits. As for the "Threat of being blocked" that was a warning of being involved in an

6274:

is the primary topic here. Everything after that has to be disambiguated, meaning that they are secondary topics. The point of the move is to ensure an enduring organization of these secondary topics on this encyclopedia. I referenced the

3846:

Hey, hope you are well. Ever since the transfer all my things have changed. My editing options arnt the same and I no longer recieve emails when a page is changed even though I still have the option ticked and everything. Any thoughts...?

2544:

be edited to reflect this. You wrote, "We can modify the 'Top Critics' bullet under 'Limitations' to indicate not to use it." Betty Logan, who also has participated in the discussion over the last few days agreed, writing "covering it at

4796:

template creep is more of a problem with producer and screenwriter templates because there can be multiple people credited for either (which sets up for potential bloat). That's far less likely with film director templates, I think.

4443:

So far a 7x expansion. Started as a 302 characters (48 words) "readable prose size" stub and it was a snap to bring it so far up to 2186 characters (356 words) "readable prose size" start class. Want to help out with a suitable DYK?

5461:

I think if movies that have end credits listed by appearance and by appearance, they should not be included because it will create confusion among readers. As for the other ones, that should be discussed in the general discussion.

353:

regarding the "X in film" concept and what it is and isn't supposed to be. I appear to be trying to explain the concept to some closed minds and an explanation from others may help loosen the thinking processes slightly! Thanks -

5970:

respectively. In your search engine, I see that it is 9,120 results versus 15,900 results respectively. I think you should report that comparison, but I was searching for what was most common in English-language sources overall.

5851:

I think the best way to narrow it down would be to include five names- McConaughey, Sheridan, Shepard, Lofland, and Witherspoon. That way, we get both the four names on the poster and the top four actors from the ending credits.

2454:

having any kind of dialogue. When neither party can concede even temporarily, the situation escalates. So dispute resolution is about dialogue, starting with the two editors, then including others as necessary. I also think that

6384:, but it just didn't take. I think he needs to browse our film articles to comprehend how Knowledge (XXG) can be far more encompassing than other sources (other than databases, of course). Funnily enough, it led to me creating 5486:

That is what Bluerules is saying. :) None of us want to follow any ordering that is alphabetical or by appearance. It is a matter of following ordering that is by prominence. Hopefully we can figure out some pointers for that.

4977:. I'm backlogged with articles I'm drafting. I encourage you to work on the draft article. The linked category in the draft article lists other unfinished films that can be added to the first table. Thanks! I'm going to invite 3008:. I have been looking at that conversation and dipping in and out occasionally. Why are they notable enough to be mentioned in the cast section when they are all played by "nobodies" who have no star credits before this film? 175:

of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

2170: 3995:

I noticed that you've kept it my way, for now, which I do prefer, as it shows exact totals, which I care about. Some care about. I don't know if I want to keep doing that because I don't want to offend anyone else's style.

2176:

Users may edit the articles during the discussions, including to improve the articles to address concerns raised in the discussions. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion templates from the top of the articles. –

2519:

have their say and now have wandered off to other things, but (as you might suspect) I would like to edit some pages as a result of this discussion, so I'd like to know how I will know when we are at that point. Thanks.

1507:

It's as important as Titanics size and position on earth, 270 meters long and resting in the north Atlantic 4 000 meters deep. Without that information, Titanic's just another sunk boat somewhere. It carries the story.

946:

films making ridiculous amounts of money despite being critically reviled. :) We can try to look for reliable sources that talk about the people who went to the movie. The problem with user ratings is that it is not a

5009: 4604: 3150:, I am in the States and have access to a really good library, so I can get my hands on most of everything related to the film. The problem is that the incentive is not there. I'd rather do something like work on 1504:

location in space, Zeta2 Reticuli, was extremely carefully chosen by Ridley Scott among millions of star systems, because of it´s proximity to earth and it´s newly discovered disc of debris surrounding the star.

837:

Film names, as I recall, they are either in English (normally) or in French/Czech with full accents in the rare cases when they haven't been internationally released. So not an area where diacritics arise I take

5702:

films. In short, I think the precedent is to have three actual films before having a film series article that can aggregate content. I will put it up for AfD, and we can see what the consensus turns out to be.

2166: 4929: 951:

poll. Maybe the people who really liked the film tended to be the ones who voted, where the ones who thought otherwise did not bother. That's part of why we do not use IMDb user ratings. Maybe we can do a

4101:

While I don't think that my comment was too uncivil, I am always open to being more friendly, and I have refactored my post so that it is less "bitey" and more educational. Let me know what you think. --

3558:

OK cool. Well I have just resized the image so it is below 300 in width. Most of the wording in the template I used form Star Trek Into Darkness and others I had seen. So hopefully that will be fine :)

853:

Yeay I know, I'm evidently cheesed off with the subject, hence dumping on your talk page not on the RM. Frankly whatever with the Ho Chi Minh Prize. If you really want to move it go ahead and close it.

3440: 3429: 996:

straight in the Defense Department: "I mean, the way you keep changing the figures on me all the time. It makes me look like some kind of a nut, like an idiot." She holds up a newspaper and proclaims:

5686:, it would be premature to have an article about a third film due to uncertainty of actual production. I have put together a few film series articles and have seen discussions on others. For example, 3874:

I do not see any change to my login yet. I do not get emails about changes, either, so I'm not familiar with that. Sorry! :( Maybe if the change does happen for me, I can review and provide feedback.

180: 171: 2980:

Happy holidays to you too! :) I looked at the discussion, and I'm not quite sure what to recommend. One possibility that comes to mind is putting Les Amis de l'ABC in a side table (like you see at

6204:

Was there a discussion I missed about this move? Prometheus the 2012 film is clearly the primary topic and the other is disambiguated, and you did it while it's in the middle of a FAC nomination.

4881: 3079:, I simply can't access an English book physically. Wouldn't it be easier just to have to join us in the article, and then you provide whatever statements you can provide from offline sources? 6236:

from just "(film)" to ("19XX film") based on this determination that disambiguated topics are not primary. It should not be a controversial move and should not affect the FAC process either.

4666: 4640:

You might remember my proposal about 2 years ago to split actors and actress categories, Consensus was strongly against for gender equality or something wasn't it. Can you at least inform

3743:

I'm sorry for putting unsourced version in the page, but there has been lots of killer toys all over TV series and movies. Don't these version have any source of their own? I don't think "

2310: 5729: 5289: 5072:

Hello Erik. Thanks for your post at the film project talk page. You might already be aware of it but in case you aren't I wanted you to know that the conversation is also ongoing here

3949:

Hi, it was a problem with the way the content was included. I've updated the infobox to mention both names, though I'm not sure what the best way to present the "themes" bit would be.

2540:. In short, 23 months ago four editors contributed to a discussion about using RT's "Top critics" scores. All four agreed that they should not be used. One editor (you) suggested that 1309:. It seems to be a notable review site with reviews written by notable critics. Probably best not to be hasty about removing references to it even if they were added by a COI editor. ~ 5416:

Anyways, to answer your questions- I believe the infobox should be based on the poster. I consider it to be a separate entity from the cast section and different rules apply to it.

4615:

I'd really appreciate it if you could help me out in making this change. Thanks very much, and please let me know if there is any other way I can help to facilitate this alteration.

3465:

this in the past, but I do not think that the level of detail on such plans for a film is warranted compared to when a film is actually made. As I mentioned at the AfD, I suggested

3139:, I've listed articles with upcoming anniversaries that can help serve as a goal to get Featured Article status and to have it on the main page. That kind of target can motivate me. 3808: 1477: 1473: 4227:

to get the RM discussion closed. I'm telling my friends about this XKCD posting now... haha. I'm part of webcomic history! Sort of! I didn't contribute as many kB as most of you.

2711:

At this wonderful time of year, I would like to give season’s greetings to all the fellow Wikipedians I have interacted with in the past! May you have a wonderful holiday season!

688:

in chronological order, including pre-production, design, and also, I am planning to extensively the music section as well. However, we may have to remove some websites that fail

5690:

is up for deletion, but I am arguing to keep it due to the grouping of three films. I think a good way to compare that film series to this one is to look at Box Office Mojo. The

4605:

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2012/11/steven-spielberg-and-daniel-day-lewis-speak-with-abcs-diane-sawyer-in-their-only-joint-television-interview-about-the-movie-lincoln/

6493:. I'm especially keen to get this section moved over into the article sooner rather than later, since the current "History" section has quite a bit of material plagiarized from 293: 2099: 1609: 4127:

Hi, I've created a nice quiet page about the possibility of enforcing a break from debating Star Trek into Darkness. Would you mind taking a look, and giving your opinions?

1515:, Chefrens true egyptian name. Your peers couldn´t find this in lesser and ordinary english speaking encyclopedias/references, deemed it not important, and it was deleted. 1272:

is an interesting read, involving admins and a bureaucrat eventually deciding the name was OK and unblocked him, thereby setting the precedent. His intent was to edit only

367: 6554:

should really come after the 'D' part, especially we're talking about multiple articles... this is just an unnecessary disruption to make twelve changes instead of four.

4974: 3717:

Hi. I am cleaning up old messages from my Talk Page, that I had not tended to as of yet. Sorry for the delay. Belated thanks for your help in the above matter. Thanks!

2537: 1277:

making only minor maintenance edits as needed and for anything else he'd propose it on the talk page. That's the sort of COI editor I don't mind having around here. ~

3288: 880:

Very kind and collegial of you to alert me to a post in which I was discussed without my knowledge. I appreciate having had the change to respond! Much regards,

6079:, what are the thoughts on using the official website as a source for basic facts such as genre of the film? But not about this film, but films in general. -- 3118:, for which I've already done some research. (I find it easy to do research but do not quite have enough time to tackle actual article work.) The problem with 895:

I wish you opened your statement more amicably. I don't think it is a good opening to suggest that the editor was up to no good for asking for help elsewhere.

2260:

and threatened with being blocked. If you could post a message to editor "MisterShiney" pointing out the validity of the edit I would appreciate it. Thanks.

6341: 4528:

For all your effort in trying to maintain some form of order in the aftermath of xkcd-gate. Nobody killed anybody, which I see as something to be proud of.

2739:

Also best wishes for your 2013 and happy editing whenever possible :-) Your return to editing here is one of the best things that happened all year. Cheers

2153: 4188:. It will elevate the capitalization attention beyond Knowledge (XXG). The filmmakers can comment, linguists can comment, etc. Perhaps the end is near. :) 6515: 6490: 6321: 5900: 470:

article's history and in the WT:FILM discussion. Once again, please accept my apologies for what I have done. By the way, I am working on the article in

4610: 2959:

Also, in addition to the above notice, I want to wish you Happy Holidays as well! Keep up the good work, as usual, Erik! All the best for the new year,

1340:

choose the reviews for that sample set that best assess a film's qualities (or lack thereof). It looks like Emma has stopped after your final warning.

502:

Also, just so you are aware, we are trying to come up with a compromise in the plot section's ending regarding San and Ashitaka, as recently discussed

4264: 375: 5157: 5073: 3932:? The film's music credits should read: Music by Halli Cauthery, Themes by Harry Gregson-Williams. This is verifiable in print in the film's reviews. 1757:

like having a film library on here.. Yeah potentially we could have hundreds of pages like this, I think its great for film studies and research.♦

4303:

If you don't mind, I restored the section heading to point to the WP:AN discussion. I've already posted the WP:ANI discussion a couple of times.

5330:

to "Iron Man (film franchise)" or "Iron Man in film" in order to discourage the article currently about the films from becoming a duplicate of

2400: 2148: 418:. I am also concerned that an IP who edits the article claims to have a consensus regarding the use of "awards" vs. "accolades" (as indicated 3677:. Hello. Are you the head of the Knowledge (XXG) Film Projects? If so, I have a question for you. If not, do you know who is? Thanks. ( 6486: 6317: 5358:. Wish the request was not made, but would like to see the move completed before shaping the article accordingly. I have a starting draft at 5270: 2968: 2950: 2938: 2553:

was never modified nor was there any further discussion of so doing that I could find. I worry that the same thing could be happening again.

1917: 1016:--johncheverly (talk) 7:25 pm, Today (UTC−4)johncheverly9/21/12/7:23pm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johncheverly (talk • contribs) 701: 649: 573: 515: 487: 440: 359: 3292: 681: 139:

for it. Just fill in the specifics as they apply to the image in question, as sticking the template in without filling it in isn't enough.

726:

Erik, re Gladiator, thanks, does nicely. Your user name, you must have got it pretty early for such a simple and relatively common name.

2825:, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. 2579: 2520: 1192: 5619:

because there has been dispute of cast orders there too in the past and yes, I'll be waiting for the invitation on that subject on the

1675:

Much appreciate your work on the bibliography of film encyclopedias and service to film reference and films on wikipedia as a whole. ♦

263:

He hasn't edited since November and I emailed him to see if he just quit but no response. I wonder if we'll ever know where he went. --

3128:

to bring it up to snuff in time for its 10th anniversary. I got it displayed on the main page of Knowledge (XXG) for the anniversary.

3103: 2926: 2002: 1840: 1378: 742: 3076: 6233: 6137:

Thats cool. So would you say that as a basic descriptive statement of fact, using the official website for a genre would be fine? --

4704:

so I'd prefer to get an experienced film article editor to look at this and wait for Lugnuts to be unblocked before doing an RFC. -

3708: 2554: 2476:

Thanks. I'll bear that in mind next time. I will admit, all I saw as an IP user removing content and changing long standing essays.

2371: 2314: 2261: 533:

to the editor that you want to add value and not change things for the sake of changing things (which I suspect is what he thinks).

1735:

Do you realize what you've done? :P I really like compiling this kind of information, and you've opened the floodgates for me. :)

355: 2142: 927: 834:

Hi, thanks for this reply. Sorry to alarm you with the "timing" thing. You're right, should be careful how one says these things.

350: 3106:), but the other editor bailed. In general, I tend to personally work on articles about films of relatively limited scope, like 2195:

Hi Erik, it seems you do some great work on films on wikipedia. Currently, there is a deletion debate on the award winning film

1632: 6489:

article into place. I'm not sure if you've seen, but I've posted a proposal for a new version of the "History" section over at

5616: 1714: 685: 471: 6543:

visual consistency (feel free to start a discussion about it, but personally I don't care). See also the recent discussion at

6284:

enforcing such distinctions. If you remain unconvinced by that, you can undo the move, and I'll go ahead with a move request.

5662:

even if it does not have a third film release yet, it is still informative to the reader and does no harm by existing. Thanks

4128: 4010:

Before we do that, I want to see if you agree with something like this. $ 35,000,000+. If not, your way works for the budget.

2450: 1106: 5687: 4900:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

3400: 2653: 2028: 1439: 2409: 1540:, as has already been explained) that it wasn't necessary a second time. Pardon my "ignorence" in avoiding redundancy. :/ 5559:

s give a quick rundown. As for your last statement, are you asking about how to set up the discussion? We would have it at

1150: 1129: 6447:) and things seem not to be getting through to him so far. Maybe being overturned in the AFD will have tempered him some. 4073:

Maybe I will watchlist it again if silence truly does ensue over the capitalization issue until new evidence surfaces. :)

3928:

Hello. I am curious as to why you re-edited out the correction I made to the composer credit for the film title The East (

1718: 4839: 4029: 4015: 4001: 3983: 2087: 1640: 6414:

was so against standing consensus, it was somewhat surprising. I do hope he takes advice and seeks advice from others.

5945:

I mean with "quote" "The world of Apu" and "Apur Sansar"! It sometimes gives better results than Google News search! --

3470:

definite topic that blossoms to be worked with. If nothing ever happens, then the section can remain mostly unchanged.

2458:

is active enough that if you run into film-related concerns, you can post there and get help from one of the regulars.

2157: 1222:, it can be considered a promotional username. In any case, I redacted my username statement and encouraged looking at 395: 5161: 4024:

No need for a discussion. Your way works for budget, but being specific with gross may work, if that's okay with you.

3793: 3722: 3682: 2031:) appears to be a sockpuppet doing the same thing, so I'm undoing these solicitations until the account gets blocked. 330: 6514:

Hi Erik, There's been some discussion about my proposed changes to the "History" section of the MPAA article over at

6353:

that one. The nominator comments make it appear he may have a MAJOR misunderstanding of inclusion criteria for film.

4611:

http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/12-new-lincoln-photos-as-film-heads-towards-wide-release-wide-acclaim-20121115

4865: 4851: 1266:

In fairness, my warning was time-stamped after that edit, so I'm going to keep watching before using the ban-hammer.

6583: 6401: 6293: 6260: 6245: 6209: 6181: 6122: 6054: 6039: 6011: 5980: 5836: 5787: 5741: 5712: 5580: 5496: 5446: 5371: 5359: 5238: 5185: 5132: 5101: 4901: 4887: 4805: 4738: 4583: 4473: 4371: 4312: 4290: 4236: 4197: 4159: 4082: 3958: 3883: 3592: 3549: 3533: 3479: 3380: 3247: 3169: 3048: 2993: 2901: 2877: 2843: 2762: 2674: 2467: 2347: 2294: 2229: 2040: 1864: 1784: 1744: 1701: 1618: 1583: 1451: 1390: 1349: 1257: 1235: 1162: 1088: 965: 904: 825: 771: 611: 542: 460: 414:

to GA status, but there are some concerns regarding whether we should use the cast members in the lead section per

391: 110:

Hi, Erik. I understand that you, being a long term member to Knowledge (XXG), could help me with a problem I have.

38: 6075:

Hey, I respect your opinion, you are an established editor with a good reputation. As to what is going on over on

1113: 6423: 6362: 5766: 5389: 5355: 5343: 4641: 4491: 4464:

I don't know if I would be good at researching it. Are you just using Google Translate to implement the sources?

4453: 3829: 3695:

Erik's currently on a WikiBreak right now. If you have a general question, you could consider dropping a line at

3453: 2810: 1181:

The username isn't a violation; you may want to retract that comment. We have precedent with other users such as

97: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 3937: 2405: 2282: 5213: 5017: 4701: 4693: 4534: 4213: 4174: 4137: 2642:. Mainly just keep watching it! And try and work out why so many different user names are tinkering with it! — 2370:

I agree again. So long as MisterShiney does not get me blocked, I'm happy to discuss the matter further first.

506:. I have already requested Betty Logan to weigh in on this as well. Any ideas or suggestions for a compromise? 3296: 3193: 2583: 2083: 202: 6229: 5628: 5525: 5467: 5331: 5036: 4053: 4025: 4011: 3997: 3979: 3633: 3532:

Congrats on the milestone! :) You do not need a lot of detail in the file description page, though. Look at

2524: 2076: 1636: 1269: 1186: 859: 806: 791: 334: 3933: 3781: 2558: 2217: 1828: 923: 730: 6146: 6088: 5568: 5564: 5205: 5048: 4832: 4574:

My pleasure! No worries about the lack of change; the article itself was great work. Congrats on the DYK!

4530: 4389: 4340: 4209: 4170: 4133: 3901: 3856: 3718: 3678: 3646: 3568: 3514: 3408: 3322: 3084: 3017: 2485: 2421: 1996: 1878: 1836: 1797: 1372: 1023: 738: 503: 475: 230: 133: 119: 6027: 5620: 5560: 5410: 4725: 3696: 2817:, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a 2575: 2455: 2278: 2249: 407: 6381: 6256: 6221: 6205: 6050: 6023: 6007: 5893: 5886: 5658: 4917: 4844: 4645: 4434: 3757: 3704: 3268: 3201: 3152: 2873: 2375: 2318: 2265: 2253: 2204: 2113: 1801: 1800:. It needs a lot of verification and seems to get some traffic so needs to be watched by a few people.♦ 1758: 1722: 1676: 6431:

I do too, he's been badgering for page moves on titles currently disambiguated by their capitals (like

4897: 2866: 2814: 1992: 1368: 942:

If there is no report from CinemaScore, then box office figures tend to be our gauge. For example, the

4982: 2196: 6416: 6373: 6355: 5762: 5667: 5382: 5336: 5327: 5303: 4484: 4446: 4421: 3822: 3446: 2803: 1520: 1128:

This is one of a group of geography titles IIO moved. This notification due to your participation in

931: 6110: 5695: 4938: 3502:. Can you just give the fair use a once over and check that it's ok please? Thanks. It can be found 415: 6559: 6523: 6502: 6457: 6329: 5950: 5936: 5913: 5873: 5857: 5812: 5425: 5209: 5115: 5081: 5013: 4952: 4674: 3358: 2744: 2716: 2018: 1905: 1550: 1429: 1057: 193: 149: 1248:. I'm not finding a transition to being a seasoned editor that uses multiple sources very likely. 758:! As for my user name, it was actually already registered, but nobody was using it. I was able to 6385: 6316:

Hi Erik, Thanks again for your advice on my proposed rewrite of the film ratings section for the

5928: 5624: 5612: 5521: 5463: 5266: 5258: 4622: 4562: 4061: 3499: 3232: 2964: 2946: 2934: 2647: 2252:. Sorry for misreading you (disputing/disrupting). I have just been warned on my talk page here: 2022: 1913: 1485: 1433: 1408: 1315: 1283: 1205: 1182: 1137: 885: 855: 802: 787: 697: 645: 569: 511: 483: 436: 3503: 759: 5334:? This wouilkd also entail a cleaning up of other redirects so as to better serve the readers. 3892:

Hmmm never mind, seems to have corrected itself. I just now need to revisit all the pages lol.

2208: 6139: 6106: 6081: 5041: 4970: 4382: 4333: 4107: 3894: 3849: 3639: 3561: 3537: 3507: 3433: 3404: 3339: 3318: 3222: 3136: 3080: 3010: 2478: 2414: 2010: 1967: 1940: 1874: 1832: 1614: 1019: 734: 411: 289: 278: 269: 253: 226: 115: 6350: 4891: 3317:

Hi Erik, what do you think about the article? I hope you have a positive opinion about it...

2550: 2546: 2541: 2199:. If you had a moment, it would be great if you offered you support for the article. Thanks! 1532:

This particular "ignorent idiot" felt that since the information you added to the plot for

5204:

Hello, as you have not participated in this discussion, would please review the proposal at

4913: 4269: 3700: 3699:

or consider asking one of the project's members who work on foreign films. --Happy editing!

3399:

Hi Erik, thank you for your constructive comment. Can I ask you a question about sources of

3264: 3238:

templates for the links. Please nudge me if I have not responded by the end of the weekend!

3197: 2220:. Please avoid spamming or campaigning. I will not be able to weigh in at the AfD. Regards, 2200: 2109: 2054: 1979: 1844: 1000:

his romance as dangerous to her own plans, and maternally 'brainwashes' him to give her up:

847: 6551: 6544: 5683: 5323: 4224: 3215: 1472:

Hello, Erik. This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion is taking place at

1223: 1196: 953: 5725: 5679: 5663: 5300: 4990: 4875: 4758: 4712: 4417: 3789: 3763: 2818: 2697: 2622: 2257: 1516: 816:

there are good points made about how English-language reliable sources mention the topic.

326: 6411: 5552:

One possible rule of thumb if that happens is to use other sources. Some reviews such as

4921: 3817: 3816:

I think that the one reliable source supports a reasonable redirect, but not independent

1963: 1772: 689: 4515: 2813:

is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes

6579: 6571: 6555: 6519: 6498: 6448: 6397: 6377: 6325: 6289: 6241: 6177: 6118: 6035: 5976: 5959: 5946: 5932: 5909: 5853: 5832: 5824: 5808: 5783: 5737: 5708: 5576: 5492: 5442: 5421: 5367: 5234: 5181: 5128: 5111: 5097: 5077: 4948: 4801: 4734: 4670: 4579: 4469: 4367: 4308: 4286: 4232: 4193: 4155: 4078: 3954: 3879: 3674: 3588: 3545: 3475: 3376: 3354: 3243: 3189: 3165: 3044: 2989: 2897: 2839: 2822: 2758: 2740: 2712: 2670: 2639: 2618: 2463: 2343: 2290: 2225: 2036: 1860: 1780: 1740: 1697: 1625: 1579: 1541: 1447: 1386: 1345: 1253: 1231: 1158: 1084: 1048: 961: 900: 821: 767: 607: 538: 456: 387: 184: 140: 47: 17: 6485:

Hey Erik, Thanks again for your help getting the "Film rating system" section of the

5262: 4978: 4943: 4618: 4558: 4057: 3769: 3751: 3205: 2960: 2942: 2930: 2643: 2082:

You look to still be a film expert - you think you can get them to give it a rest? --

1909: 1481: 1403: 1310: 1278: 1200: 1133: 881: 693: 641: 565: 507: 479: 432: 5035:

Hello, there is currently a discussion in place re the title of "Pacfic Rim" on the

2604: 2574:

I'm not sure if you are around, so I have added the same questions I asked above to

6389: 5563:. I think that we should wait a few days or so because there are a couple of cases— 4859: 4658: 4103: 3619: 3436: 3349: 1936: 1821: 1662: 1621:. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with 1537: 1306: 984: 264: 246: 4607: 3075:

can't tell you what I need nor can I read them and make use of them. As I said on

2309:

Sounds good to me. I should also add, editor "MisterShiney" has now complained at

1149:

I'll have to recuse myself from this more general discussion. I only commented at

4884:. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 3263:

wikipedia live help chat where, they told me that the sources are very reliable.

3035:

Some of the actors mentioned are those who were involved in stage productions of

2536:

One more thought while I wait for your reply: I just discovered this discussion:

5409:

I've been pretty busy at the moment, but I'll raise the issue of cast orders at

4131:, and please feel free to invite anyone you feel would add to the conversation. 3774: 3420: 2178: 2050: 1975: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

6587: 6563: 6527: 6506: 6466: 6426: 6405: 6365: 6333: 6297: 6264: 6249: 6213: 6185: 6156: 6126: 6098: 6058: 6043: 6015: 5984: 5954: 5940: 5917: 5861: 5840: 5816: 5791: 5770: 5745: 5716: 5671: 5632: 5584: 5529: 5500: 5471: 5450: 5429: 5392: 5375: 5346: 5308: 5274: 5242: 5217: 5189: 5168: 5136: 5118: 5105: 5084: 5058: 5021: 4994: 4956: 4809: 4787: 4762: 4742: 4716: 4678: 4650: 4626: 4587: 4566: 4539: 4494: 4477: 4456: 4425: 4399: 4375: 4350: 4316: 4294: 4273: 4240: 4218: 4201: 4179: 4163: 4142: 4113: 4086: 4065: 4033: 4019: 4005: 3987: 3962: 3941: 3911: 3887: 3866: 3832: 3797: 3726: 3712: 3686: 3656: 3596: 3578: 3553: 3524: 3483: 3456: 3412: 3384: 3362: 3326: 3300: 3272: 3251: 3192:. I invite you to tell my what do you think about my example of the page here: 3173: 3088: 3052: 3027: 2997: 2972: 2954: 2905: 2881: 2847: 2766: 2747: 2727: 2719: 2678: 2657: 2587: 2562: 2528: 2495: 2471: 2431: 2379: 2351: 2322: 2298: 2269: 2233: 2181: 2117: 2091: 2058: 2044: 1983: 1944: 1921: 1882: 1868: 1806: 1788: 1763: 1748: 1727: 1705: 1681: 1644: 1587: 1559: 1524: 1489: 1455: 1413: 1394: 1353: 1320: 1288: 1261: 1239: 1210: 1166: 1141: 1092: 1066: 1027: 969: 935: 908: 889: 863: 829: 810: 795: 775: 746: 705: 653: 615: 577: 546: 519: 491: 464: 444: 339: 271: 257: 234: 158: 123: 6444: 6440: 6324:. If you have a chance, could you take a look and see what you think? Thanks! 6271: 6225: 5997: 5110:

You are welcome. Always glad to have your input at any conversation at WikiP.

5074:

Knowledge (XXG):Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Box Office Mojo and Boxoffice.com

4986: 4871: 4754: 4705: 3785: 3347:

I have raised issues in the talk page; join in discussion. Or you may improve

3124: 3108: 2981: 2613:

To you and yours, Have a Merry ______ (fill in the blank) and Happy New Year!

1603: 313: 305: 301: 297: 5611:

We should also settle for other cases on some other film articles; including

3289:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for creation/International Online Film Critics' Poll

6575: 6436: 6432: 6393: 6285: 6237: 6173: 6114: 6031: 5972: 5828: 5779: 5733: 5704: 5572: 5488: 5438: 5363: 5230: 5177: 5124: 5093: 4797: 4730: 4575: 4465: 4363: 4304: 4282: 4228: 4189: 4151: 4074: 4052:

As an involved editor, you're invited to keep an eye on new developments at

3950: 3875: 3584: 3541: 3471: 3466: 3372: 3239: 3161: 3114: 3098: 3040: 2985: 2893: 2835: 2787: 2754: 2666: 2614: 2459: 2339: 2286: 2221: 2171:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of films featuring home invasions

2032: 1974:

in your edit summary. Could you please explain why you did this? Thank you.

1856: 1820:

Without sounding insensitive to the other guy, but your last comment on the

1776: 1736: 1693: 1575: 1443: 1382: 1341: 1249: 1227: 1154: 1080: 957: 896: 817: 763: 603: 534: 452: 383: 309: 410:

and see what your opinions are on this matter. I am trying to help improve

5778:

Appreciate that. :) No worries about it. I'm glad we could come to terms.

3978:

already a certain format laid out before I arrive on the page. Take care.

3188:

Hi Erik, thank you a lot for your comment in the the discussion about the

431:, and a further explanation from you may help solve this matter. Regards, 5039:, that if you could swing by and provide some input that would be great. 1072:

Thanks for the confirmation. :) And congratulations on its promotion and

1476:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is

5437:

That sounds like a good start. Look forward to the general discussion!

5010:

WT:WikiProject Film/Comic book films task force#Iron Man's armor (film)

1569:

you won't find on Knowledge (XXG). I'm sure there is something for the

3156:

for its 100th anniversary in 2015; it would be a tougher project than

2578:. They should be simple enough ones for someone to be able to answer. 2167:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of films featuring diabetes

5294: 4930:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured article review/Jurassic Park (film)/archive1

3745: 1003: 990: 6494: 6228:

is (as it lacks a disambiguation term). There were similar moves at

5257:

I need a little help here: I am having a conversation with an IP at

4692:

Hi Erik. If you have time will you please look at the discussion at

4603:

info box. Here are a few sources supporting this proposed addition:

4168:

Exactly my point. I'm off to try and drain the atlantic with a mug.

2017:. If you endorse that addition, then you can restore it. Currently, 3929: 6376:, I really tried to explain the policies and guidelines to him at 5092:

Hello! I did not know that was going on. Thanks for the heads-up!

1273: 801:

It would help to know your level of familiarity with the subject.

4482:

Checking with friends who are fluent in reading other languages.

1218:

It seems like as long as she only makes contributions related to

6076: 4150:

Oh, crap. I just saw the new RM discussion. Here we go again...

2834:

Thank you very much, Michael! Happy holidays to you as well. :)

680:

Anyway, I have been expanding upon the critical reception in my

4184:

You know, there's a silver lining here as a result of the XKCD

1692:

My pleasure! You definitely called out to the right editor. :)

5259:

Talk:Spirited Away#Spirited Away is Religion animation(SHINTO)

4827: 4696:. The opposing editor - Lugnuts - is currently blocked again. 1466:

Notice of Biographies of living persons noticeboard discussion

786:

Can I ask, have you ever commented on a diacritics RM before?

692:, apart from Nausicaa.net. Thoughts or ideas on improvements? 351:

Talk:James Bond (film character)#Yet another deletion process.

25: 4667:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured article review/Halloween II/archive1

2538:

Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Film/Archive_8#Rotten_Tomatoes

956:

to see what coverage there is about audiences for this film.

684:

as well to include critical reviews and am trying to get the

406:

Hi. I was wondering if I could ask for a comment from you on

5903:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

5885: 4856:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 3498:

I just uploaded my first image! (yay). Have added it to the

3135:

s 10th anniversary would have been that same year, 2009. At

2603: 2311:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrator intervention against vandalism

1442:) is another account involved in soliciting the periodical. 980:

INFO TO SUPPORT THE ADDITION OF A LINCOLN SUBTEXT SECTION.

6410:

I'm sure he meant well, but his personal interpretation of

5730:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Journey (film series)

5229:

tomorrow, though I'd recommend asking someone else. Sorry!

5225:

Hello, I've been too busy today to be able to take a look.

5123:

Thank you for your kind words. :) Hope you are doing well.

4882:

Template:Did you know nominations/Solomon Northup's Odyssey

2914:

Discussion at Talk:Les Misérables (2012 film)#Cast billing

2549:

should be sufficient". At that point the discussion ended.

2152:

are suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

1775:

will be excellent to mine for the film genre bibliography.

349:

Hi Erik, I wonder if I could ask for a comment from you at

5261:, but he doesn't understand me. Can you step in and help? 2216:

Hello, thank you for your kind words. However, please see

4265:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators'_noticeboard#XKCD_alert...

3809:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Machine Head (film)

1474:

Knowledge (XXG):Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard

1402:

Blocked for 3 months. She can still edit by logging in. ~

1042:

Yeah, it seems like a decent fit. The film's first scene

4973:

persuaded me to begin a draft article in my user space:

4185: 2140:

Discussions are taking place as to whether the articles

4937:

The FAR is relisted, so join in discussion. Meanwhile,

4697: 4669:

is relisted, so join in for fresher, newer comments. --

4359: 2014: 1959: 1245: 1118: 843: 428: 424: 419: 6049:

Anyways, cleaned up and tags removed. Thanks again. --

2075:

I see you noticed the struggle to get user ratings on

294:

four contributors with 50 or more edits in the history

1893:

Discussion at Talk:Marvel Studios#Request for comment

4880:

The nomination discussion and review may be seen at

4700:. He does have a history of aggressive behaviour as 2399:

without consensus based on a couple of editors on a

1424:

I reviewed a couple of film articles that reference

3122:is that there's no appealing deadline. I worked on 2100:

Template:Did you know nominations/Sea Shadow (film)

1610:

Template:Did you know nominations/Sea Shadow (film)

1428:and noted their similar citation format. Turns out 598:Did you get my email with a list of references for 5208:, determine a consensus and close it. Thank you.-- 4694:Talk:Shock Troops (film)#.22Presented by.22 credit 3439:did not exist. And my defending its retention in 4975:User:Fantr/List of abandoned and unfinished films 179:To unsubscribe, please remove your name from the 5899:Message added 10:51, 10 May 2013 (UTC). You can 1511:Another battle I lost was the one about pharaoh 985:http://www.imdb.com/media/rm977372160/tt0056218 429:promptly apologized and explained my intentions 6320:article. I've now posted a revised version on 4608:http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0443272/?ref_=sr_1 4267:because there was already a discussion there. 165:WikiProject Film's January–February Newsletter 5894:Talk:The_World_of_Apu#Requested_move_2013_May 4596:Proposed addition to Lincoln (Film 2012) page 2005:) had added external links and references to 1717:. If you could help build it up over time at 976:Manchurian Candidate/Lincoln Subtext Research 8: 4724:I commented. You can post future notices at 3632:In particular for the ongoing discussion on 3070:Thank you for answering my call for help on 3061:To make sure that I understand you correctly 2927:Talk:Les Misérables (2012 film)#Cast billing 2285:. I'll message them to weigh in at WT:FILM. 5380:I like how that is developing. Quite nice. 5298:? Your input would be much appreciated. ~*~ 4753:Thanks! I've added another comment, btw. - 3196:. What do you think about it? Best wishes, 164: 5728:, I have put the article up for AfD here: 5684:the notability guidelines for future films 5008:This is a neutral request for comments at 3102:articles (and outlined a lot of resources 2925:You are invited to join the discussion at 2892:Thank you! :) Merry Christmas to you too! 2692: 1904:You are invited to join the discussion at 1771:Yep, sounds like a great initiative. BTW, 850:'s name instead of picking on foreigners. 4848:was updated with a fact from the article 4686:Quotation marks in "presented by" credit. 2785: 2154:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 2049:Thanks for the reply & for the info. 6310:Following up about film ratings for MPAA 6224:, the film is not a primary topic. Only 5571:—that I think should settle down first. 4862:chose to shoot the 1984 television film 4729:and build consensus with others' input. 3930:http://en.wikipedia.org/The_East_(film)) 5892:Hello, Erik. You have new messages at 5657:The resason i believe that the article 5354:There is a request to move the article 3401:International Online Film Critics' Poll 3190:International Online Film Critics' Poll 3182:International Online Film Critics' Poll 2256:for removing "Top Critics" scores from 1906:Talk:Marvel Studios#Request for comment 474:and have offered some additional ideas 6392:, whom I've never heard of before. :) 4964:List of abandoned and unfinished films 3371:recent Featured Articles about films. 2149:List of films featuring home invasions 1873:Yeah I agree. I'll keep that in mind. 427:(which I did not intend to do), and I 114:would really appreciate it. Thank you 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 6318:Motion Picture Association of America 5206:Talk:Iron Man's armor#Merger proposal 4104:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 3077:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Film 2872:Merry Christmas Erik, enjoy yourself 7: 5694:films have their own franchise page 1536:was already present in the article ( 6550:Also, I'd say that the 'R' part of 5698:, but there is not one for the two 4358:Worth reiterating here what I said 3287:Hi Erik, I've moved the page here: 2277:Let's centralize the discussion at 1538:Alien (film)#Spaceships and planets 2638:You asked how you could help with 2451:Knowledge (XXG):Dispute resolution 2281:. You didn't have to start one at 2165:The articles will be discussed at 1619:step 3 of the nomination procedure 1004:http://www.filmsite.org/manc3.html 991:http://www.filmsite.org/manc2.html 983:"The Manchurian Candidate" (1962) 425:accused of wikilawyering by the IP 106:Question about an image I uploaded 24: 6234:Talk:Independence Day (1996 film) 6030:. We're pretty responsive there. 4818:DYK for Solomon Northup's Odyssey 2512:Question about WT:FILM discussion 2125:Articles for deletion discussions 4831: 4514: 3618: 3112:. A future potential project is 2941:) 19:41, 27 December 2012 (UTC) 2920: 2865: 2786: 2726: 2696: 2143:List of films featuring diabetes 2131: 1899: 1661: 1602: 1305:Addendum. We have an article on 29: 5962:, I did do that. :) I searched 5617:The Incredible Burt Wonderstone 3428:When I opined for retention in 3137:User:Erik/Sandbox#Anniversaries 1715:Bibliography of film: film noir 5688:The Santa Clause (film series) 4874:where the kidnapped black man 4225:WP:ANI#Star Trek into Darkness 2009:all over Knowledge (XXG). For 1814:I like you....you're exciting! 1789:21:36, 28 September 2012 (UTC) 1764:21:32, 28 September 2012 (UTC) 1749:21:28, 28 September 2012 (UTC) 1728:21:21, 28 September 2012 (UTC) 1706:17:02, 28 September 2012 (UTC) 1682:15:55, 28 September 2012 (UTC) 1490:19:59, 29 September 2012 (UTC) 1354:01:39, 25 September 2012 (UTC) 1321:22:31, 24 September 2012 (UTC) 1289:22:13, 24 September 2012 (UTC) 1262:22:02, 24 September 2012 (UTC) 1240:22:00, 24 September 2012 (UTC) 1211:21:55, 24 September 2012 (UTC) 1167:14:11, 27 September 2012 (UTC) 1142:14:00, 27 September 2012 (UTC) 1093:18:33, 24 September 2012 (UTC) 1067:18:31, 24 September 2012 (UTC) 1028:00:32, 22 September 2012 (UTC) 970:11:46, 22 September 2012 (UTC) 936:22:57, 21 September 2012 (UTC) 909:19:51, 20 September 2012 (UTC) 890:19:49, 20 September 2012 (UTC) 864:20:45, 18 September 2012 (UTC) 830:20:39, 18 September 2012 (UTC) 811:16:48, 18 September 2012 (UTC) 796:16:36, 18 September 2012 (UTC) 776:11:25, 17 September 2012 (UTC) 747:06:47, 17 September 2012 (UTC) 706:01:59, 15 September 2012 (UTC) 654:20:13, 14 September 2012 (UTC) 616:20:05, 14 September 2012 (UTC) 578:20:02, 14 September 2012 (UTC) 547:18:17, 14 September 2012 (UTC) 520:17:52, 14 September 2012 (UTC) 492:03:09, 13 September 2012 (UTC) 465:02:30, 13 September 2012 (UTC) 445:01:19, 13 September 2012 (UTC) 396:15:24, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 376:10:19, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 1: 6479:Updates for "History" at MPAA 6140: 6082: 5042: 4957:00:07, 25 February 2013 (UTC) 4922:00:02, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 4383: 4334: 3895: 3850: 3640: 3562: 3508: 3301:19:48, 29 December 2012 (UTC) 3273:11:53, 29 December 2012 (UTC) 3252:23:47, 28 December 2012 (UTC) 3206:16:14, 28 December 2012 (UTC) 3174:18:47, 29 December 2012 (UTC) 3089:18:42, 29 December 2012 (UTC) 3053:00:36, 29 December 2012 (UTC) 3028:00:31, 29 December 2012 (UTC) 3011: 2998:00:15, 29 December 2012 (UTC) 2973:00:08, 29 December 2012 (UTC) 2955:19:41, 27 December 2012 (UTC) 2906:16:25, 25 December 2012 (UTC) 2882:03:01, 25 December 2012 (UTC) 2848:16:24, 23 December 2012 (UTC) 2767:19:01, 22 December 2012 (UTC) 2748:18:54, 22 December 2012 (UTC) 2720:18:54, 22 December 2012 (UTC) 2679:13:44, 22 December 2012 (UTC) 2665:Sure, I will take a look. :) 2658:13:43, 22 December 2012 (UTC) 2623:02:06, 22 December 2012 (UTC) 2588:23:09, 21 December 2012 (UTC) 2563:14:39, 21 December 2012 (UTC) 2529:23:19, 20 December 2012 (UTC) 2496:22:23, 17 December 2012 (UTC) 2479: 2472:21:40, 17 December 2012 (UTC) 2432:21:29, 17 December 2012 (UTC) 2415: 2380:21:25, 17 December 2012 (UTC) 2352:21:23, 17 December 2012 (UTC) 2323:21:19, 17 December 2012 (UTC) 2313:that my edits are vandalism. 2299:20:58, 17 December 2012 (UTC) 2270:20:55, 17 December 2012 (UTC) 2188: 2182:05:56, 25 November 2012 (UTC) 1719:Bibliography of film by genre 1615:Did You Know nominations page 5413:when I have more free time. 4810:21:44, 7 February 2013 (UTC) 4788:21:19, 7 February 2013 (UTC) 4763:20:28, 4 February 2013 (UTC) 4743:20:06, 4 February 2013 (UTC) 4717:19:53, 4 February 2013 (UTC) 4679:15:10, 4 February 2013 (UTC) 4651:00:14, 3 February 2013 (UTC) 4644:than I'm not making it up?♦ 4627:22:28, 31 January 2013 (UTC) 4588:19:33, 31 January 2013 (UTC) 4567:19:24, 31 January 2013 (UTC) 4540:10:21, 31 January 2013 (UTC) 4495:03:09, 31 January 2013 (UTC) 4478:02:47, 31 January 2013 (UTC) 4457:02:11, 31 January 2013 (UTC) 4426:23:55, 30 January 2013 (UTC) 4400:20:58, 30 January 2013 (UTC) 4376:20:46, 30 January 2013 (UTC) 4351:20:44, 30 January 2013 (UTC) 4317:13:54, 30 January 2013 (UTC) 4295:13:53, 30 January 2013 (UTC) 4274:13:52, 30 January 2013 (UTC) 4241:13:50, 30 January 2013 (UTC) 4219:13:47, 30 January 2013 (UTC) 4202:13:42, 30 January 2013 (UTC) 4180:13:30, 30 January 2013 (UTC) 4164:13:23, 30 January 2013 (UTC) 4143:12:49, 30 January 2013 (UTC) 4114:12:10, 30 January 2013 (UTC) 4087:00:49, 29 January 2013 (UTC) 4066:00:40, 29 January 2013 (UTC) 4034:06:40, 29 January 2013 (UTC) 4020:21:03, 28 January 2013 (UTC) 4006:07:38, 27 January 2013 (UTC) 3988:15:16, 26 January 2013 (UTC) 3963:21:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC) 3942:21:17, 23 January 2013 (UTC) 3912:19:16, 23 January 2013 (UTC) 3888:12:50, 23 January 2013 (UTC) 3867:10:39, 23 January 2013 (UTC) 3833:00:30, 22 January 2013 (UTC) 3798:18:40, 17 January 2013 (UTC) 3727:23:52, 13 January 2013 (UTC) 3667:Question about foreign films 3657:14:39, 10 January 2013 (UTC) 2804: 2702: 2234:23:06, 3 December 2012 (UTC) 2209:22:54, 3 December 2012 (UTC) 2118:16:33, 1 November 2012 (UTC) 2092:18:12, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 2059:22:19, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 2045:20:27, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 1984:20:10, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 1945:15:50, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 1922:16:59, 13 October 2012 (UTC) 1883:21:57, 11 October 2012 (UTC) 1869:18:21, 11 October 2012 (UTC) 1845:18:15, 11 October 2012 (UTC) 6388:and becoming curious about 6147: 6089: 5049: 4390: 4341: 4325:Star Trek into Darkness.... 3902: 3857: 3647: 3597:14:32, 9 January 2013 (UTC) 3579:13:39, 9 January 2013 (UTC) 3569: 3554:12:45, 9 January 2013 (UTC) 3525:10:58, 9 January 2013 (UTC) 3515: 3484:05:42, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 3457:05:35, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 3413:20:56, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 3385:20:39, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 3363:04:07, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 3327:20:33, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 3018: 2725: 2703: 2486: 2422: 2248:Thanks for your comment on 1822:Taken 2 talk page genuinely 1807:10:49, 7 October 2012 (UTC) 1645:00:49, 6 October 2012 (UTC) 1588:11:32, 3 October 2012 (UTC) 1560:10:53, 3 October 2012 (UTC) 1525:05:48, 3 October 2012 (UTC) 1456:13:07, 2 October 2012 (UTC) 1414:22:37, 1 October 2012 (UTC) 1395:22:00, 1 October 2012 (UTC) 1153:since it was film-related. 1030:johncheverly9/21/12/8:30pm 292:for GA and since there are 6605: 5393:00:12, 29 April 2013 (UTC) 5376:02:49, 25 April 2013 (UTC) 5360:User:Erik/Iron Man in film 5347:01:35, 25 April 2013 (UTC) 5309:10:18, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 5275:22:53, 19 April 2013 (UTC) 5243:18:46, 19 April 2013 (UTC) 5218:12:43, 19 April 2013 (UTC) 5190:18:39, 16 April 2013 (UTC) 5169:18:08, 16 April 2013 (UTC) 5137:15:46, 12 April 2013 (UTC) 5119:15:23, 12 April 2013 (UTC) 5106:15:17, 12 April 2013 (UTC) 5085:15:07, 12 April 2013 (UTC) 5059:12:37, 31 March 2013 (UTC) 5022:12:33, 29 March 2013 (UTC) 4223:Drew, I made a request at 3536:from the Featured Article 3534:File:Changeling poster.jpg 3006:Stalk Page Stalker comment 2695: 2218:Knowledge (XXG):Canvassing 2156:or whether they should be 1813: 1607:Hello! Your submission of 1099:Buon Ma Thuot diacritic RM 640:Yes, I did. Thanks again, 340:04:52, 8 August 2012 (UTC) 5288:Could you take a look at 4995:21:32, 1 March 2013 (UTC) 4866:Solomon Northup's Odyssey 4852:Solomon Northup's Odyssey 4642:User talk:Johnpacklambert 4513: 4095:re: September Eleven 1683 3971:"Broken City" box office. 3617: 3216:WP:REF#Repeated citations 2792: 2707:Season's Greetings, Erik! 2408:and about to go over the 1660: 1596:Incomplete DYK nomination 272:13:53, 6 March 2012 (UTC) 258:11:53, 6 March 2012 (UTC) 235:10:13, 6 March 2012 (UTC) 203:00:38, 4 March 2012 (UTC) 159:23:51, 2 March 2012 (UTC) 124:23:48, 2 March 2012 (UTC) 6588:01:42, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 6564:11:20, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 6528:17:40, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 6507:22:09, 17 May 2013 (UTC) 6467:02:50, 16 May 2013 (UTC) 6427:02:41, 16 May 2013 (UTC) 6406:02:13, 16 May 2013 (UTC) 6366:01:53, 16 May 2013 (UTC) 6334:20:09, 13 May 2013 (UTC) 6298:22:45, 12 May 2013 (UTC) 6265:22:11, 12 May 2013 (UTC) 6250:20:30, 12 May 2013 (UTC) 6214:20:27, 12 May 2013 (UTC) 6186:16:27, 11 May 2013 (UTC) 6157:16:00, 11 May 2013 (UTC) 6127:16:55, 10 May 2013 (UTC) 6099:14:19, 10 May 2013 (UTC) 6059:16:43, 10 May 2013 (UTC) 6044:13:25, 10 May 2013 (UTC) 6016:12:39, 10 May 2013 (UTC) 5985:11:39, 10 May 2013 (UTC) 5955:11:34, 10 May 2013 (UTC) 5941:11:33, 10 May 2013 (UTC) 5918:10:51, 10 May 2013 (UTC) 5862:21:35, 10 May 2013 (UTC) 5841:00:07, 10 May 2013 (UTC) 5176:Thanks for the note! :) 4896:and it will be added to 3194:User:PassionFilm/sandbox 2705: 2597: 6230:Talk:Psycho (1960 film) 5817:23:51, 9 May 2013 (UTC) 5792:03:57, 8 May 2013 (UTC) 5771:03:08, 8 May 2013 (UTC) 5746:14:15, 8 May 2013 (UTC) 5717:15:28, 7 May 2013 (UTC) 5672:15:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC) 5633:23:43, 2 May 2013 (UTC) 5585:23:12, 2 May 2013 (UTC) 5530:23:05, 2 May 2013 (UTC) 5501:22:02, 2 May 2013 (UTC) 5472:21:15, 2 May 2013 (UTC) 5451:19:36, 2 May 2013 (UTC) 5430:19:32, 2 May 2013 (UTC) 5332:Iron Man in other media 5322:So which of us will be 4902:Did you know? talk page 4817: 4709:(formerly fanthrillers) 4054:Star Trek into Darkness 3713:01:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC) 3687:17:36, 4 May 2011 (UTC) 3634:Star Trek into Darkness 2242:Looking for assistance. 2077:Atlas Shrugged: Part II 1935:Don't forget your QPQ! 1270:User talk:Mark at Alcoa 602:? Wanted to make sure. 5890: 5872:Talkback message from 5569:Gettysburg (1993 film) 5565:The Dark Knight (film) 4773:Template:Rob Letterman 4550:The Oranges (film) DYK 4416:Sure thing, Erik ;3 -- 2608: 1798:List of film accidents 1721:this would be great.♦ 1151:Talk:Hồ Chí Minh Prize 1130:Talk:Hồ Chí Minh Prize 6382:User talk:Darkstar1st 5889: 5659:Journey (film series) 5651:Journey (film series) 4522:The Civility Barnstar 4435:September Eleven 1683 4056:and its talk page. -- 3758:From Beyond the Grave 3626:The Teamwork Barnstar 3153:The Birth of a Nation 2856:Some baklava for you! 2607: 2254:User talk:99.192.91.3 1669:The Teamwork Barnstar 1617:is not complete; see 915:Last Ounce of Courage 208:Vesper Cocktail photo 42:of past discussions. 5328:Iron Man (franchise) 5198:Request for closure 4129:You can find it here 3583:Yep, you're golden. 2338:and start dialogue. 1962:edit you've removed 1796:Erik can you mother 408:WT:FILM#Cast in lead 345:"X in film" articles 5002:Request for comment 4941:to fix the article 4505:A barnstar for you! 4331:My Head hurts! lol 3609:A barnstar for you! 3181: 2197:Let's Make Lemonade 2189:Let's Make Lemonade 1970:article, and wrote 1652:A barnstar for you! 1199:, I'll block her. ~ 478:. :-) Best wishes, 6495:the MPAA's website 6386:A Field in England 6322:the MPAA Talk page 5964:"the world of apu" 5901:remove this notice 5891: 5613:Olympus Has Fallen 4878:worked in slavery? 4858:... that director 4257:moved your comment 4026:Obi-WanKenobi-2005 4012:Obi-WanKenobi-2005 3998:Obi-WanKenobi-2005 3980:Obi-WanKenobi-2005 3737:Message from D3323 3444:Shall we discuss? 3432:an article on the 2805:Michael Q. Schmidt 2609: 2084:Lenin and McCarthy 2013:, the IP did that 1952:Removal of content 1637:DYKHousekeepingBot 1478:Michael Fassbender 1244:She just promoted 1114:Buôn Ma Thuột city 1038:and home invasions 954:search engine test 754:My pleasure about 686:production section 402:WT:FILM discussion 172:January 2012 issue 6592: 6567: 6562: 6539: 6532: 6510: 6482: 6475: 6463: 6454: 6369: 6346: 6337: 6313: 6306: 6217: 6201: 6194: 6163: 6131: 6102: 6072: 6065: 6019: 6002: 5993: 5921: 5906: 5881: 5878: 5868: 5845: 5820: 5803: 5796: 5774: 5757: 5750: 5721: 5675: 5654: 5647: 5597: 5540: 5509: 5478: 5455: 5433: 5406: 5399: 5350: 5319: 5312: 5285: 5278: 5254: 5247: 5221: 5201: 5194: 5172: 5152: 5145: 5088: 5069: 5062: 5037:Article Talk Page 5032: 5025: 5005: 4998: 4967: 4960: 4934: 4924: 4909: 4908: 4907: 4895: 4824: 4821: 4814: 4791: 4776: 4769: 4747: 4720: 4689: 4682: 4663: 4654: 4637: 4630: 4599: 4592: 4570: 4553: 4546: 4545: 4544: 4508: 4501: 4460: 4440: 4429: 4413: 4406: 4354: 4328: 4321: 4299: 4277: 4272: 4260: 4253: 4146: 4124: 4121:Enforcing a Break 4117: 4098: 4091: 4069: 4049: 4042: 3991: 3974: 3967: 3945: 3925: 3918: 3870: 3843: 3836: 3813: 3803: 3801: 3784:comment added by 3740: 3733: 3719:Joseph A. Spadaro 3691: 3679:Joseph A. Spadaro 3670: 3663: 3662: 3661: 3612: 3605: 3538:Changeling (film) 3528: 3495: 3488: 3460: 3434:James Dalessandro 3425: 3416: 3396: 3389: 3366: 3344: 3340:Talk:Halloween II 3335: 3309: 3279: 3256: 3209: 3185: 3178: 3142: 3092: 3064: 3057: 3031: 3002: 2976: 2917: 2910: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2859: 2852: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2780: 2773: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2690: 2683: 2661: 2635: 2628: 2625: 2610: 2601: 2598:Season's tidings! 2594: 2568: 2532: 2515: 2508: 2440: 2390: 2360: 2329: 2303: 2273: 2245: 2238: 2212: 2192: 2185: 2161: 2137: 2128: 2121: 2104: 2095: 2072: 2065: 2011:Cinema of Nigeria 1987: 1972:"Removed refspam" 1968:Cinema of Nigeria 1966:content from the 1955: 1948: 1932: 1925: 1896: 1889: 1850: 1848: 1831:comment added by 1817: 1810: 1793: 1767: 1753: 1731: 1710: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1655: 1648: 1599: 1592: 1564: 1556: 1547: 1528: 1500: 1493: 1469: 1462: 1418: 1412: 1398: 1364: 1329: 1319: 1297: 1287: 1214: 1209: 1178: 1171: 1144: 1132: 1063: 1054: 926:comment added by 750: 733:comment added by 600:Princess Mononoke 412:Princess Mononoke 290:Black Swan (film) 279:Black Swan (film) 199: 190: 181:distribution list 155: 146: 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 6596: 6568: 6558: 6540: 6533: 6511: 6483: 6476: 6464: 6459: 6455: 6450: 6419: 6370: 6358: 6347: 6338: 6314: 6307: 6281:Independence Day 6257:Darkwarriorblake 6222:Darkwarriorblake 6218: 6206:Darkwarriorblake 6202: 6195: 6164: 6155: 6153: 6144: 6132: 6103: 6097: 6095: 6086: 6073: 6066: 6051:FoolMeOnce2Times 6024:FoolMeOnce2Times 6020: 6008:FoolMeOnce2Times 6003: 5994: 5922: 5907: 5904: 5883: 5880: 5869: 5846: 5821: 5804: 5797: 5775: 5758: 5751: 5722: 5676: 5655: 5648: 5598: 5558: 5541: 5510: 5479: 5456: 5434: 5407: 5400: 5385: 5351: 5339: 5320: 5313: 5286: 5279: 5255: 5248: 5222: 5202: 5195: 5173: 5166: 5153: 5146: 5089: 5070: 5063: 5057: 5055: 5046: 5033: 5026: 5006: 4999: 4968: 4961: 4935: 4926: 4911: 4885: 4840:21 February 2013 4835: 4828: 4826: 4823: 4815: 4792: 4785: 4783:Ten Pound Hammer 4777: 4770: 4748: 4721: 4690: 4683: 4664: 4655: 4648: 4638: 4631: 4600: 4593: 4571: 4554: 4547: 4538: 4537: 4518: 4511: 4510: 4509: 4502: 4487: 4461: 4449: 4441: 4430: 4414: 4410:12 Years a Slave 4407: 4398: 4396: 4387: 4355: 4349: 4347: 4338: 4329: 4322: 4300: 4281:Cheers, thanks. 4278: 4268: 4261: 4254: 4217: 4216: 4178: 4177: 4147: 4141: 4140: 4125: 4118: 4110: 4099: 4092: 4070: 4050: 4043: 3992: 3975: 3968: 3946: 3934:F65748689920106A 3926: 3919: 3910: 3908: 3899: 3871: 3865: 3863: 3854: 3844: 3837: 3825: 3814: 3804: 3800: 3778: 3741: 3734: 3692: 3671: 3664: 3655: 3653: 3644: 3622: 3615: 3614: 3613: 3606: 3577: 3575: 3566: 3529: 3523: 3521: 3512: 3496: 3489: 3461: 3449: 3426: 3417: 3397: 3390: 3367: 3345: 3336: 3310: 3280: 3257: 3237: 3231: 3227: 3221: 3210: 3186: 3179: 3143: 3134: 3093: 3065: 3058: 3032: 3026: 3024: 3015: 3003: 2977: 2924: 2923: 2918: 2911: 2889: 2874:Darkwarriorblake 2869: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2853: 2831: 2806: 2790: 2783: 2782: 2781: 2774: 2736: 2730: 2723: 2709: 2700: 2693: 2691: 2684: 2662: 2636: 2629: 2627: 2612: 2602: 2595: 2569: 2565:(=99.192.87.126) 2533: 2516: 2509: 2494: 2492: 2483: 2441: 2430: 2428: 2419: 2401:single film page 2391: 2361: 2330: 2304: 2274: 2246: 2239: 2213: 2193: 2186: 2163: 2139: 2135: 2134: 2129: 2122: 2105: 2096: 2073: 2066: 1988: 1956: 1949: 1933: 1926: 1903: 1902: 1897: 1890: 1851: 1847: 1825: 1818: 1811: 1804: 1794: 1768: 1761: 1754: 1732: 1725: 1711: 1689: 1679: 1665: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1649: 1630: 1624: 1606: 1600: 1593: 1565: 1557: 1552: 1548: 1543: 1529: 1501: 1494: 1470: 1463: 1419: 1406: 1399: 1365: 1330: 1313: 1298: 1281: 1215: 1203: 1179: 1172: 1146: 1127: 1126: 1121: 1078: 1064: 1059: 1055: 1050: 938: 749: 727: 690:reliable sources 372: 364: 338: 321: 267: 249: 200: 195: 191: 186: 156: 151: 147: 142: 138: 132: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 6604: 6603: 6599: 6598: 6597: 6595: 6594: 6593: 6538: 6481: 6458: 6449: 6417: 6356: 6345: 6312: 6200: 6151: 6138: 6093: 6080: 6071: 6001: 5905: 5898: 5877: 5802: 5800:Mud explanation 5763:493Titanollante 5756: 5653: 5556: 5405: 5383: 5337: 5318: 5284: 5253: 5200: 5162: 5151: 5068: 5053: 5040: 5031: 5004: 4966: 4939:do not hesitate 4933: 4876:Solomon Northup 4820: 4781: 4775: 4688: 4662: 4646: 4636: 4598: 4552: 4533: 4529: 4507: 4485: 4447: 4439: 4412: 4394: 4381: 4345: 4332: 4327: 4259: 4212: 4208: 4173: 4169: 4136: 4132: 4123: 4112: 4108: 4097: 4048: 3973: 3924: 3906: 3893: 3861: 3848: 3842: 3823: 3812: 3779: 3764:The Great Gabbo 3739: 3669: 3651: 3638: 3611: 3573: 3560: 3519: 3506: 3494: 3447: 3424: 3395: 3343: 3235: 3229: 3225: 3219: 3184: 3132: 3063: 3022: 3009: 2982:Panic Room#Cast 2921: 2916: 2858: 2819:Merry Christmas 2779: 2689: 2634: 2600: 2514: 2490: 2477: 2426: 2413: 2258:Stargate (film) 2244: 2191: 2136: 2132: 2127: 2103: 2071: 1958:Hi there. With 1954: 1931: 1900: 1895: 1826: 1816: 1802: 1759: 1723: 1713:Seems to work, 1677: 1654: 1628: 1622: 1598: 1551: 1542: 1499: 1468: 1177: 1175:Emmafilmcomment 1117: 1101: 1076: 1058: 1049: 1040: 978: 921: 917: 878: 784: 762:it for myself. 728: 724: 416:WP:MOSFILM#Lead 404: 371: 368: 363: 360: 347: 324: 315: 288:I'm nominating 283: 265: 247: 242: 210: 194: 185: 167: 150: 141: 136: 130: 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 6602: 6600: 6591: 6590: 6537: 6534: 6531: 6530: 6480: 6477: 6474: 6473: 6472: 6471: 6470: 6469: 6378:Talk:Kill List 6344: 6339: 6311: 6308: 6305: 6304: 6303: 6302: 6301: 6300: 6199: 6196: 6193: 6192: 6191: 6190: 6189: 6188: 6162: 6161: 6160: 6159: 6149: 6130: 6129: 6091: 6070: 6067: 6064: 6063: 6062: 6061: 6000: 5995: 5992: 5991: 5990: 5989: 5988: 5987: 5943: 5897: 5884: 5876: 5870: 5867: 5866: 5865: 5864: 5844: 5843: 5801: 5798: 5795: 5794: 5755: 5752: 5749: 5748: 5720: 5719: 5652: 5649: 5646: 5645: 5644: 5643: 5642: 5641: 5640: 5639: 5638: 5637: 5636: 5635: 5596: 5595: 5594: 5593: 5592: 5591: 5590: 5589: 5588: 5587: 5539: 5538: 5537: 5536: 5535: 5534: 5533: 5532: 5508: 5507: 5506: 5505: 5504: 5503: 5477: 5476: 5475: 5474: 5454: 5453: 5404: 5401: 5398: 5397: 5396: 5395: 5317: 5314: 5283: 5280: 5252: 5249: 5246: 5245: 5210:TriiipleThreat 5199: 5196: 5193: 5192: 5150: 5149:Mediation note 5147: 5144: 5143: 5142: 5141: 5140: 5139: 5067: 5064: 5051: 5030: 5027: 5014:TriiipleThreat 5003: 5000: 4965: 4962: 4932: 4927: 4906: 4905: 4836: 4819: 4816: 4813: 4812: 4774: 4771: 4768: 4767: 4766: 4765: 4746: 4745: 4687: 4684: 4661: 4656: 4635: 4632: 4597: 4594: 4591: 4590: 4551: 4548: 4543: 4542: 4525: 4524: 4519: 4506: 4503: 4500: 4499: 4498: 4497: 4438: 4431: 4411: 4408: 4405: 4404: 4403: 4402: 4392: 4343: 4326: 4323: 4320: 4319: 4298: 4297: 4258: 4255: 4252: 4251: 4250: 4249: 4248: 4247: 4246: 4245: 4244: 4243: 4122: 4119: 4102: 4096: 4093: 4090: 4089: 4047: 4046:Neutral notice 4044: 4041: 4040: 4039: 4038: 4037: 4036: 3972: 3969: 3966: 3965: 3923: 3920: 3917: 3916: 3915: 3914: 3904: 3859: 3841: 3838: 3811: 3805: 3773:" are part of 3738: 3735: 3732: 3731: 3730: 3729: 3675:User talk:Erik 3668: 3665: 3660: 3659: 3649: 3629: 3628: 3623: 3610: 3607: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3571: 3517: 3493: 3490: 3487: 3486: 3423: 3418: 3394: 3391: 3388: 3387: 3342: 3337: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3331: 3330: 3329: 3308: 3307: 3306: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3293:95.252.231.213 3278: 3277: 3276: 3275: 3255: 3254: 3183: 3180: 3177: 3176: 3141: 3140: 3062: 3059: 3056: 3055: 3037:Les Misérables 3020: 3001: 3000: 2915: 2912: 2909: 2908: 2885: 2884: 2870: 2857: 2854: 2851: 2850: 2827: 2826: 2823:Happy New Year 2799: 2798: 2793: 2791: 2778: 2775: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2732: 2731: 2724: 2710: 2701: 2688: 2685: 2682: 2681: 2640:The Day (film) 2633: 2630: 2599: 2596: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2567: 2566: 2513: 2510: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2488: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2424: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2302: 2301: 2243: 2240: 2237: 2236: 2190: 2187: 2130: 2126: 2123: 2102: 2097: 2070: 2067: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 1953: 1950: 1930: 1927: 1894: 1891: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1824:made me lol. 1815: 1812: 1792: 1791: 1752: 1751: 1709: 1708: 1685: 1684: 1672: 1671: 1666: 1653: 1650: 1635:. Thank you. 1597: 1594: 1591: 1590: 1563: 1562: 1498: 1495: 1467: 1464: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1417: 1416: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1267: 1176: 1173: 1170: 1169: 1124: 1123: 1100: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1039: 1032: 977: 974: 973: 972: 916: 913: 912: 911: 877: 874: 873: 872: 871: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 844:like this etc. 839: 835: 783: 780: 779: 778: 723: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 708: 667: 666: 665: 664: 663: 662: 661: 660: 659: 658: 657: 656: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 587: 586: 585: 584: 583: 582: 581: 580: 554: 553: 552: 551: 550: 549: 525: 524: 523: 522: 497: 496: 495: 494: 403: 400: 399: 398: 369: 361: 346: 343: 282: 276: 275: 274: 241: 238: 209: 206: 166: 163: 162: 161: 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 18:User talk:Erik 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 6601: 6589: 6585: 6581: 6577: 6573: 6570: 6569: 6566: 6565: 6561: 6557: 6553: 6548: 6546: 6535: 6529: 6525: 6521: 6517: 6513: 6512: 6509: 6508: 6504: 6500: 6496: 6492: 6488: 6478: 6468: 6465: 6462: 6456: 6453: 6446: 6442: 6438: 6434: 6430: 6429: 6428: 6425: 6424: 6421: 6420: 6413: 6409: 6408: 6407: 6403: 6399: 6395: 6391: 6387: 6383: 6379: 6375: 6372: 6371: 6368: 6367: 6364: 6363: 6360: 6359: 6352: 6343: 6340: 6336: 6335: 6331: 6327: 6323: 6319: 6309: 6299: 6295: 6291: 6287: 6282: 6278: 6273: 6268: 6267: 6266: 6262: 6258: 6253: 6252: 6251: 6247: 6243: 6239: 6235: 6231: 6227: 6223: 6220: 6219: 6216: 6215: 6211: 6207: 6197: 6187: 6183: 6179: 6175: 6170: 6169: 6168: 6167: 6166: 6165: 6158: 6154: 6152: 6145: 6143: 6136: 6135: 6134: 6133: 6128: 6124: 6120: 6116: 6112: 6108: 6105: 6104: 6101: 6100: 6096: 6094: 6087: 6085: 6078: 6068: 6060: 6056: 6052: 6047: 6046: 6045: 6041: 6037: 6033: 6029: 6025: 6022: 6021: 6018: 6017: 6013: 6009: 5999: 5996: 5986: 5982: 5978: 5974: 5969: 5965: 5961: 5958: 5957: 5956: 5952: 5948: 5944: 5942: 5938: 5934: 5930: 5926: 5925: 5924: 5923: 5920: 5919: 5915: 5911: 5902: 5895: 5888: 5882: 5875: 5871: 5863: 5859: 5855: 5850: 5849: 5848: 5847: 5842: 5838: 5834: 5830: 5826: 5823: 5822: 5819: 5818: 5814: 5810: 5799: 5793: 5789: 5785: 5781: 5777: 5776: 5773: 5772: 5768: 5764: 5753: 5747: 5743: 5739: 5735: 5731: 5727: 5724: 5723: 5718: 5714: 5710: 5706: 5701: 5697: 5693: 5689: 5685: 5681: 5678: 5677: 5674: 5673: 5669: 5665: 5660: 5650: 5634: 5630: 5626: 5625:BattleshipMan 5622: 5618: 5614: 5610: 5609: 5608: 5607: 5606: 5605: 5604: 5603: 5602: 5601: 5600: 5599: 5586: 5582: 5578: 5574: 5570: 5566: 5562: 5555: 5551: 5550: 5549: 5548: 5547: 5546: 5545: 5544: 5543: 5542: 5531: 5527: 5523: 5522:BattleshipMan 5518: 5517: 5516: 5515: 5514: 5513: 5512: 5511: 5502: 5498: 5494: 5490: 5485: 5484: 5483: 5482: 5481: 5480: 5473: 5469: 5465: 5464:BattleshipMan 5460: 5459: 5458: 5457: 5452: 5448: 5444: 5440: 5436: 5435: 5432: 5431: 5427: 5423: 5417: 5414: 5412: 5402: 5394: 5391: 5390: 5387: 5386: 5379: 5378: 5377: 5373: 5369: 5365: 5361: 5357: 5353: 5352: 5349: 5348: 5345: 5344: 5341: 5340: 5333: 5329: 5326:and move the 5325: 5315: 5311: 5310: 5306: 5305: 5302: 5297: 5296: 5291: 5281: 5277: 5276: 5272: 5271:contributions 5268: 5264: 5263:Lord Sjones23 5260: 5251:Spirited Away 5250: 5244: 5240: 5236: 5232: 5228: 5224: 5223: 5220: 5219: 5215: 5211: 5207: 5197: 5191: 5187: 5183: 5179: 5175: 5174: 5171: 5170: 5167: 5165: 5159: 5148: 5138: 5134: 5130: 5126: 5122: 5121: 5120: 5117: 5113: 5109: 5108: 5107: 5103: 5099: 5095: 5091: 5090: 5087: 5086: 5083: 5079: 5075: 5065: 5061: 5060: 5056: 5054: 5047: 5045: 5038: 5028: 5024: 5023: 5019: 5015: 5011: 5001: 4997: 4996: 4992: 4988: 4984: 4980: 4976: 4972: 4963: 4959: 4958: 4954: 4950: 4946: 4945: 4944:Jurassic Park 4940: 4931: 4928: 4925: 4923: 4919: 4915: 4903: 4899: 4893: 4889: 4883: 4879: 4877: 4873: 4868: 4867: 4863: 4861: 4855: 4854: 4853: 4847: 4846: 4845:Did you know? 4841: 4837: 4834: 4830: 4829: 4825: 4811: 4807: 4803: 4799: 4794: 4793: 4790: 4789: 4784: 4772: 4764: 4760: 4756: 4752: 4751: 4750: 4749: 4744: 4740: 4736: 4732: 4727: 4723: 4722: 4719: 4718: 4714: 4710: 4707: 4703: 4702:outlined here 4699: 4698:Block history 4695: 4685: 4681: 4680: 4676: 4672: 4668: 4660: 4657: 4653: 4652: 4649: 4647:Dr. ☠ Blofeld 4643: 4633: 4629: 4628: 4624: 4620: 4616: 4613: 4612: 4609: 4606: 4595: 4589: 4585: 4581: 4577: 4573: 4572: 4569: 4568: 4564: 4560: 4549: 4541: 4536: 4532: 4527: 4526: 4523: 4520: 4517: 4512: 4504: 4496: 4493: 4492: 4489: 4488: 4481: 4480: 4479: 4475: 4471: 4467: 4463: 4462: 4459: 4458: 4455: 4454: 4451: 4450: 4437: 4436: 4432: 4428: 4427: 4423: 4419: 4409: 4401: 4397: 4395: 4388: 4386: 4379: 4378: 4377: 4373: 4369: 4365: 4361: 4357: 4356: 4353: 4352: 4348: 4346: 4339: 4337: 4324: 4318: 4314: 4310: 4306: 4302: 4301: 4296: 4292: 4288: 4284: 4280: 4279: 4276: 4275: 4271: 4266: 4256: 4242: 4238: 4234: 4230: 4226: 4222: 4221: 4220: 4215: 4211: 4205: 4204: 4203: 4199: 4195: 4191: 4187: 4183: 4182: 4181: 4176: 4172: 4167: 4166: 4165: 4161: 4157: 4153: 4149: 4148: 4145: 4144: 4139: 4135: 4130: 4120: 4116: 4115: 4111: 4105: 4094: 4088: 4084: 4080: 4076: 4072: 4071: 4068: 4067: 4063: 4059: 4055: 4045: 4035: 4031: 4027: 4023: 4022: 4021: 4017: 4013: 4009: 4008: 4007: 4003: 3999: 3994: 3993: 3990: 3989: 3985: 3981: 3970: 3964: 3960: 3956: 3952: 3948: 3947: 3944: 3943: 3939: 3935: 3931: 3921: 3913: 3909: 3907: 3900: 3898: 3891: 3890: 3889: 3885: 3881: 3877: 3873: 3872: 3869: 3868: 3864: 3862: 3855: 3853: 3839: 3835: 3834: 3831: 3830: 3827: 3826: 3819: 3810: 3806: 3802: 3799: 3795: 3791: 3787: 3783: 3776: 3772: 3771: 3770:House of Evil 3766: 3765: 3760: 3759: 3754: 3753: 3752:Dead of Night 3748: 3747: 3736: 3728: 3724: 3720: 3716: 3715: 3714: 3710: 3706: 3702: 3698: 3694: 3693: 3690: 3688: 3684: 3680: 3676: 3666: 3658: 3654: 3652: 3645: 3643: 3635: 3631: 3630: 3627: 3624: 3621: 3616: 3608: 3598: 3594: 3590: 3586: 3582: 3581: 3580: 3576: 3574: 3567: 3565: 3557: 3556: 3555: 3551: 3547: 3543: 3539: 3535: 3531: 3530: 3527: 3526: 3522: 3520: 3513: 3511: 3505: 3501: 3491: 3485: 3481: 3477: 3473: 3468: 3463: 3462: 3459: 3458: 3455: 3454: 3451: 3450: 3442: 3438: 3435: 3431: 3422: 3419: 3415: 3414: 3410: 3406: 3402: 3392: 3386: 3382: 3378: 3374: 3369: 3368: 3365: 3364: 3360: 3356: 3352: 3351: 3341: 3338: 3328: 3324: 3320: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3313: 3312: 3311: 3302: 3298: 3294: 3290: 3286: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3281: 3274: 3270: 3266: 3261: 3260: 3259: 3258: 3253: 3249: 3245: 3241: 3234: 3224: 3217: 3212: 3211: 3208: 3207: 3203: 3199: 3195: 3191: 3175: 3171: 3167: 3163: 3159: 3155: 3154: 3149: 3145: 3144: 3138: 3131: 3127: 3126: 3121: 3117: 3116: 3111: 3110: 3105: 3101: 3100: 3095: 3094: 3091: 3090: 3086: 3082: 3078: 3073: 3068: 3060: 3054: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3034: 3033: 3030: 3029: 3025: 3023: 3016: 3014: 3007: 2999: 2995: 2991: 2987: 2983: 2979: 2978: 2975: 2974: 2970: 2969:contributions 2966: 2962: 2961:Lord Sjones23 2957: 2956: 2952: 2951:contributions 2948: 2944: 2943:Lord Sjones23 2940: 2939:contributions 2936: 2932: 2931:Lord Sjones23 2928: 2913: 2907: 2903: 2899: 2895: 2891: 2890: 2883: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2868: 2864: 2863: 2855: 2849: 2845: 2841: 2837: 2833: 2832: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2812: 2811: 2808: 2807: 2801: 2800: 2797: 2796:Holiday Cheer 2794: 2789: 2784: 2777:Holiday cheer 2776: 2768: 2764: 2760: 2756: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2746: 2742: 2738: 2737: 2729: 2722: 2721: 2718: 2714: 2708: 2699: 2694: 2686: 2680: 2676: 2672: 2668: 2664: 2663: 2660: 2659: 2655: 2652: 2649: 2645: 2641: 2631: 2626: 2624: 2620: 2616: 2606: 2589: 2585: 2581: 2580:99.192.75.232 2577: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2564: 2560: 2556: 2552: 2548: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2534: 2531: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2521:99.192.87.126 2511: 2497: 2493: 2491: 2484: 2482: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2469: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2452: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2433: 2429: 2427: 2420: 2418: 2411: 2407: 2402: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2381: 2377: 2373: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2341: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2284: 2280: 2276: 2275: 2272: 2271: 2267: 2263: 2259: 2255: 2251: 2241: 2235: 2231: 2227: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2214: 2211: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2198: 2184: 2183: 2180: 2174: 2172: 2168: 2162: 2159: 2155: 2151: 2150: 2145: 2144: 2124: 2120: 2119: 2115: 2111: 2101: 2098: 2094: 2093: 2089: 2088:Complain here 2085: 2080: 2078: 2068: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2027: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2004: 2001: 1998: 1994: 1990: 1989: 1986: 1985: 1981: 1977: 1973: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1951: 1947: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1928: 1924: 1923: 1919: 1918:contributions 1915: 1911: 1910:Lord Sjones23 1907: 1892: 1884: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1853: 1852: 1849: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1834: 1830: 1823: 1809: 1808: 1805: 1799: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1769: 1766: 1765: 1762: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1733: 1730: 1729: 1726: 1720: 1716: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1690: 1683: 1680: 1674: 1673: 1670: 1667: 1664: 1659: 1651: 1647: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1627: 1620: 1616: 1612: 1611: 1605: 1595: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1572: 1567: 1566: 1561: 1558: 1555: 1549: 1546: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1530: 1527: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1509: 1505: 1496: 1492: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1480:. Thank you. 1479: 1475: 1465: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1438: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1415: 1410: 1405: 1401: 1400: 1397: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1377: 1374: 1370: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1343: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1322: 1317: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1290: 1285: 1280: 1275: 1271: 1268: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1216: 1213: 1212: 1207: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1191: 1188: 1184: 1183:Mark at Alcoa 1174: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1147: 1145: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1122: 1120: 1119:Buon Ma Thuot 1115: 1110: 1108: 1103: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1075: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1065: 1062: 1056: 1053: 1045: 1037: 1033: 1031: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1005: 1001: 997: 993: 992: 987: 986: 981: 975: 971: 967: 963: 959: 955: 950: 945: 941: 940: 939: 937: 933: 929: 925: 914: 910: 906: 902: 898: 894: 893: 892: 891: 887: 883: 875: 865: 861: 857: 856:In ictu oculi 852: 851: 849: 848:Chloë Sevigny 845: 840: 836: 833: 832: 831: 827: 823: 819: 814: 813: 812: 808: 804: 803:In ictu oculi 800: 799: 798: 797: 793: 789: 788:In ictu oculi 781: 777: 773: 769: 765: 761: 757: 753: 752: 751: 748: 744: 740: 736: 732: 721: 707: 703: 702:contributions 699: 695: 694:Lord Sjones23 691: 687: 683: 679: 678: 677: 676: 675: 674: 673: 672: 671: 670: 669: 668: 655: 651: 650:contributions 647: 643: 642:Lord Sjones23 639: 638: 637: 636: 635: 634: 633: 632: 631: 630: 629: 628: 617: 613: 609: 605: 601: 597: 596: 595: 594: 593: 592: 591: 590: 589: 588: 579: 575: 574:contributions 571: 567: 566:Lord Sjones23 562: 561: 560: 559: 558: 557: 556: 555: 548: 544: 540: 536: 531: 530: 529: 528: 527: 526: 521: 517: 516:contributions 513: 509: 508:Lord Sjones23 505: 501: 500: 499: 498: 493: 489: 488:contributions 485: 481: 480:Lord Sjones23 477: 473: 468: 467: 466: 462: 458: 454: 449: 448: 447: 446: 442: 441:contributions 438: 434: 433:Lord Sjones23 430: 426: 421: 417: 413: 409: 401: 397: 393: 389: 385: 380: 379: 378: 377: 373: 365: 357: 352: 344: 342: 341: 336: 332: 328: 323: 319: 311: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 287: 280: 277: 273: 270: 268: 262: 261: 260: 259: 255: 251: 250: 240:Are you there 239: 237: 236: 232: 228: 223: 220: 217: 213: 207: 205: 204: 201: 198: 192: 189: 182: 177: 174: 173: 160: 157: 154: 148: 145: 135: 134:Non-free logo 128: 127: 126: 125: 121: 117: 111: 105: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 6549: 6541: 6536:Displaytitle 6484: 6460: 6451: 6422: 6415: 6390:Ben Wheatley 6361: 6354: 6348: 6315: 6280: 6276: 6203: 6148: 6142:MisterShiney 6141: 6107:MisterShiney 6090: 6084:MisterShiney 6083: 6074: 6004: 5968:"apu sansar" 5967: 5963: 5908: 5879: 5805: 5759: 5699: 5692:Santa Clause 5691: 5656: 5553: 5418: 5415: 5408: 5388: 5381: 5342: 5335: 5321: 5299: 5293: 5287: 5256: 5226: 5203: 5163: 5156:question is 5154: 5071: 5050: 5044:MisterShiney 5043: 5034: 5007: 4971:Clarityfiend 4969: 4942: 4936: 4910: 4869: 4864: 4860:Gordon Parks 4857: 4850: 4849: 4843: 4822: 4782: 4778: 4708: 4691: 4665: 4659:Halloween II 4639: 4617: 4614: 4601: 4555: 4521: 4490: 4483: 4452: 4445: 4442: 4433: 4415: 4391: 4385:MisterShiney 4384: 4342: 4336:MisterShiney 4335: 4330: 4262: 4126: 4100: 4051: 3976: 3927: 3903: 3897:MisterShiney 3896: 3858: 3852:MisterShiney 3851: 3845: 3840:A bit random 3828: 3821: 3815: 3780:— Preceding 3768: 3762: 3756: 3750: 3744: 3742: 3672: 3648: 3642:MisterShiney 3641: 3625: 3570: 3564:MisterShiney 3563: 3516: 3510:MisterShiney 3509: 3497: 3452: 3445: 3427: 3405:Robert Hardy 3398: 3350:Halloween II 3348: 3346: 3319:Robert Hardy 3187: 3157: 3151: 3147: 3129: 3123: 3119: 3113: 3107: 3097: 3081:Anthonydraco 3071: 3069: 3066: 3036: 3019: 3013:MisterShiney 3012: 3005: 3004: 2958: 2919: 2809: 2802: 2795: 2706: 2704: 2650: 2637: 2611: 2517: 2487: 2481:MisterShiney 2480: 2423: 2417:MisterShiney 2416: 2247: 2194: 2175: 2164: 2147: 2141: 2138: 2106: 2081: 2074: 2025: 2007:Film Comment 2006: 1999: 1993:204.19.162.2 1971: 1957: 1934: 1898: 1875:MisterShiney 1833:MisterShiney 1827:— Preceding 1819: 1795: 1755: 1712: 1668: 1608: 1601: 1570: 1553: 1544: 1533: 1512: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1471: 1436: 1426:Film Comment 1425: 1375: 1369:204.19.162.2 1366: 1307:Film Comment 1220:Film Comment 1219: 1189: 1180: 1125: 1112: 1104: 1073: 1060: 1051: 1043: 1041: 1035: 1020:johncheverly 1018: 1015: 1011: 1007: 1002: 998: 994: 988: 982: 979: 948: 944:Transformers 943: 922:— Preceding 918: 879: 785: 755: 735:Brunswicknic 729:— Preceding 725: 599: 420:in this edit 405: 348: 317: 285: 284: 245: 243: 227:TabascoMan77 224: 221: 218: 214: 212:Hi, Erik... 211: 196: 187: 178: 170: 168: 152: 143: 116:Monkeys 9711 112: 109: 78: 43: 37: 6342:early close 5927:Please try 5403:Cast orders 5160:. Regards, 5029:Pacific Rim 4985:to join. - 4983:Betty Logan 4914:Crisco 1492 4892:quick check 3775:Killer toys 3701:Nehrams2020 3430:August 2010 3421:1906 (film) 3265:PassionFilm 3198:PassionFilm 3067:Dear Erik, 2687:Merry Merry 2555:99.192.70.9 2372:99.192.91.3 2315:99.192.91.3 2262:99.192.91.3 2201:Yohowithrum 2110:BlueMoonset 1803:Dr. Blofeld 1760:Dr. Blofeld 1724:Dr. Blofeld 1678:Dr. Blofeld 1631:, or ask a 1367:Please see 1079:s as well! 382:available. 36:This is an 6445:field trip 6441:Field Trip 6272:Prometheus 6226:Prometheus 6198:Prometheus 6111:WP:PRIMARY 5998:Booked Out 5947:Tito Dutta 5933:Tito Dutta 5910:Tito Dutta 5874:Tito Dutta 5732:. Thanks, 5726:Frogkermit 5680:Frogkermit 5664:Frogkermit 5076:. Cheers. 4888:here's how 4872:Deep South 4418:Bartallen2 4109:reply here 3818:notability 3218:and using 3158:The Matrix 3148:The Matrix 3130:The Matrix 3125:Fight Club 3120:The Matrix 3109:Panic Room 3072:The Matrix 2615:FWiW Bzuk 2283:WT:MOSFILM 1929:Sea Shadow 1517:Stringence 1074:Eraserhead 928:66.87.0.99 472:my sandbox 306:User:Fsm83 302:User:Bbb23 298:User:Koavf 286:Nominating 98:Archive 30 90:Archive 28 85:Archive 27 79:Archive 26 73:Archive 25 68:Archive 24 60:Archive 20 6572:Matma Rex 6556:Matma Rex 6520:MPAA Kyle 6516:Talk:MPAA 6499:MPAA Kyle 6491:Talk:MPAA 6437:kill list 6433:Kill List 6349:Happy to 6326:MPAA Kyle 5929:this tool 5854:Bluerules 5825:Bluerules 5809:Bluerules 5422:Bluerules 5316:Question: 5112:MarnetteD 5078:MarnetteD 4949:George Ho 4671:George Ho 4634:Actresses 3467:Brad Bird 3441:July 2012 3393:RE: IOFCA 3355:George Ho 3233:Cite news 3115:25th Hour 3099:Kill Bill 2741:MarnetteD 2713:MarnetteD 1633:DYK admin 1036:Manhunter 949:bona fide 756:Gladiator 310:User:Erik 219:Help? :) 6584:contribs 6418:Schmidt, 6402:contribs 6357:Schmidt, 6294:contribs 6246:contribs 6182:contribs 6123:contribs 6040:contribs 5981:contribs 5837:contribs 5788:contribs 5742:contribs 5713:contribs 5581:contribs 5497:contribs 5447:contribs 5384:Schmidt, 5372:contribs 5338:Schmidt, 5239:contribs 5186:contribs 5133:contribs 5102:contribs 4979:SchroCat 4898:DYKSTATS 4806:contribs 4739:contribs 4619:Jbettigo 4584:contribs 4559:Sofffie7 4531:drewmunn 4486:Schmidt, 4474:contribs 4448:Schmidt, 4372:contribs 4360:at WP:AN 4313:contribs 4291:contribs 4237:contribs 4210:drewmunn 4198:contribs 4171:drewmunn 4160:contribs 4134:drewmunn 4083:contribs 4058:Tenebrae 3959:contribs 3922:The East 3884:contribs 3824:Schmidt, 3794:contribs 3782:unsigned 3767:", and " 3593:contribs 3550:contribs 3480:contribs 3448:Schmidt, 3381:contribs 3291:. Best, 3248:contribs 3223:Cite web 3170:contribs 3049:contribs 2994:contribs 2902:contribs 2844:contribs 2815:WikiLove 2763:contribs 2675:contribs 2654:contribs 2644:RHaworth 2468:contribs 2406:Edit War 2348:contribs 2295:contribs 2230:contribs 2041:contribs 2029:contribs 2019:Ethelbug 2003:contribs 1865:contribs 1841:contribs 1829:unsigned 1785:contribs 1745:contribs 1702:contribs 1584:contribs 1482:Favonian 1452:contribs 1440:contribs 1430:Mslifkin 1404:Amatulić 1391:contribs 1379:contribs 1350:contribs 1311:Amatulić 1279:Amatulić 1258:contribs 1236:contribs 1201:Amatulić 1193:contribs 1163:contribs 1134:Kauffner 1089:contribs 966:contribs 924:unsigned 905:contribs 882:Tenebrae 826:contribs 772:contribs 743:contribs 731:unsigned 612:contribs 543:contribs 461:contribs 392:contribs 356:SchroCat 314:Justin ( 225:-- Matt 222:Thanks! 6452:GRAPPLE 6028:WT:FILM 5951:contact 5937:contact 5931:too! -- 5914:contact 5700:Journey 5621:WT:FILM 5561:WT:FILM 5554:Variety 5411:WT:FILM 5290:the FAC 4870:in the 4726:WT:FILM 4186:posting 3709:contrib 3697:WT:FILM 3500:article 3228:and/or 2632:The Day 2576:WT:FILM 2551:WP:RTMC 2547:WP:RTMC 2542:WP:RTMC 2456:WT:FILM 2279:WT:FILM 2250:WT:FILM 2158:deleted 1964:sourced 1937:Abyssal 1613:at the 1545:GRAPPLE 1107:Discuss 1052:GRAPPLE 682:sandbox 266:Peppage 248:Lugnuts 188:GRAPPLE 144:GRAPPLE 39:archive 6552:WP:BRD 6545:WP:VPT 6277:Psycho 6109:, per 5682:, per 5295:Ra.One 4380:Done. 4270:NE Ent 3746:Asylum 2821:and a 2179:Zntrip 2051:Amsaim 1991:Sure! 1976:Amsaim 1513:Rachaf 1224:WP:COI 1197:WP:RSN 989:Dude, 876:Thanks 722:thanks 308:, and 6412:WP:NF 5304:Bhatt 5301:Ankit 5227:Maybe 5164:m.o.p 4987:Fantr 4755:Fantr 4706:Fantr 4362:. :) 3807:inre 3786:D3323 3437:novel 2069:Atlas 1626:db-g7 1571:Alien 1534:Alien 1497:Alien 1274:Alcoa 1246:again 760:usurp 281:as GA 16:< 6580:talk 6576:Erik 6560:talk 6524:talk 6503:talk 6487:MPAA 6398:talk 6394:Erik 6380:and 6374:Dude 6351:snow 6330:talk 6290:talk 6286:Erik 6279:and 6261:talk 6242:talk 6238:Erik 6232:and 6210:talk 6178:talk 6174:Erik 6119:talk 6115:Erik 6077:RIPD 6069:Hey, 6055:talk 6036:talk 6032:Erik 6012:talk 5977:talk 5973:Erik 5966:and 5960:Tito 5858:talk 5833:talk 5829:Erik 5813:talk 5784:talk 5780:Erik 5767:talk 5738:talk 5734:Erik 5709:talk 5705:Erik 5696:here 5668:talk 5629:talk 5615:and 5577:talk 5573:Erik 5567:and 5526:talk 5493:talk 5489:Erik 5468:talk 5443:talk 5439:Erik 5426:talk 5368:talk 5364:Erik 5356:here 5324:bold 5307:~*~ 5267:talk 5235:talk 5231:Erik 5214:talk 5182:talk 5178:Erik 5158:here 5129:talk 5125:Erik 5116:Talk 5098:talk 5094:Erik 5082:Talk 5018:talk 4991:talk 4981:and 4953:talk 4947:. -- 4918:talk 4802:talk 4798:Erik 4759:talk 4735:talk 4731:Erik 4713:talk 4675:talk 4623:talk 4580:talk 4576:Erik 4563:talk 4535:talk 4470:talk 4466:Erik 4422:talk 4368:talk 4364:Erik 4309:talk 4305:Erik 4287:talk 4283:Erik 4233:talk 4229:Erik 4214:talk 4194:talk 4190:Erik 4175:talk 4156:talk 4152:Erik 4138:talk 4079:talk 4075:Erik 4062:talk 4030:talk 4016:talk 4002:talk 3984:talk 3955:talk 3951:Erik 3938:talk 3880:talk 3876:Erik 3790:talk 3761:", " 3755:", " 3749:", " 3723:talk 3705:talk 3683:talk 3673:To: 3589:talk 3585:Erik 3546:talk 3542:Erik 3504:here 3492:Hey, 3476:talk 3472:Erik 3409:talk 3377:talk 3373:Erik 3359:talk 3353:. -- 3323:talk 3297:talk 3269:talk 3244:talk 3240:Erik 3202:talk 3166:talk 3162:Erik 3146:For 3104:here 3085:talk 3045:talk 3041:Erik 2990:talk 2986:Erik 2965:talk 2947:talk 2935:talk 2898:talk 2894:Erik 2878:talk 2840:talk 2836:Erik 2759:talk 2755:Erik 2745:Talk 2717:Talk 2671:talk 2667:Erik 2648:talk 2619:talk 2584:talk 2559:talk 2525:talk 2464:talk 2460:Erik 2376:talk 2344:talk 2340:Erik 2319:talk 2291:talk 2287:Erik 2266:talk 2226:talk 2222:Erik 2205:talk 2169:and 2146:and 2114:talk 2086:| ( 2055:talk 2037:talk 2033:Erik 2023:talk 2015:here 1997:talk 1980:talk 1960:this 1941:talk 1914:talk 1879:talk 1861:talk 1857:Erik 1837:talk 1781:talk 1777:Erik 1773:this 1741:talk 1737:Erik 1698:talk 1694:Erik 1641:talk 1580:talk 1576:Erik 1521:talk 1486:talk 1448:talk 1444:Erik 1434:talk 1409:talk 1387:talk 1383:Erik 1373:talk 1346:talk 1342:Erik 1316:talk 1284:talk 1254:talk 1250:Erik 1232:talk 1228:Erik 1206:talk 1187:talk 1159:talk 1155:Erik 1138:talk 1085:talk 1081:Erik 1034:Re: 1024:talk 962:talk 958:Erik 932:talk 901:talk 897:Erik 886:talk 860:talk 822:talk 818:Erik 807:talk 792:talk 768:talk 764:Erik 739:talk 698:talk 646:talk 608:talk 604:Erik 570:talk 539:talk 535:Erik 512:talk 504:here 484:talk 476:here 457:talk 453:Erik 437:talk 388:talk 384:Erik 254:talk 231:talk 169:The 129:Use 120:talk 5754:Hey 5292:of 5282:FAC 5066:FYI 5012:.-- 4838:On 4786:• 4263:To 3777:. 2929:. 2410:3RR 1908:. 1381:). 838:it? 6586:) 6582:| 6547:. 6526:) 6505:) 6439:, 6404:) 6400:| 6332:) 6296:) 6292:| 6263:) 6248:) 6244:| 6212:) 6184:) 6180:| 6125:) 6121:| 6057:) 6042:) 6038:| 6014:) 6006:-- 5983:) 5979:| 5953:) 5939:) 5916:) 5860:) 5839:) 5835:| 5815:) 5790:) 5786:| 5769:) 5744:) 5740:| 5715:) 5711:| 5670:) 5631:) 5623:. 5583:) 5579:| 5528:) 5499:) 5495:| 5470:) 5449:) 5445:| 5428:) 5374:) 5370:| 5362:. 5273:) 5269:- 5241:) 5237:| 5216:) 5188:) 5184:| 5135:) 5131:| 5114:| 5104:) 5100:| 5080:| 5020:) 4993:) 4955:) 4920:) 4912:— 4890:, 4842:, 4808:) 4804:| 4761:) 4741:) 4737:| 4715:) 4677:) 4625:) 4586:) 4582:| 4565:) 4476:) 4472:| 4424:) 4374:) 4370:| 4315:) 4311:| 4293:) 4289:| 4239:) 4235:| 4200:) 4196:| 4162:) 4158:| 4085:) 4081:| 4064:) 4032:) 4018:) 4004:) 3986:) 3961:) 3957:| 3940:) 3886:) 3882:| 3820:. 3796:) 3792:• 3725:) 3711:) 3707:• 3689:) 3685:) 3595:) 3591:| 3552:) 3548:| 3482:) 3478:| 3411:) 3403:? 3383:) 3379:| 3361:) 3325:) 3299:) 3271:) 3250:) 3246:| 3236:}} 3230:{{ 3226:}} 3220:{{ 3204:) 3172:) 3168:| 3087:) 3051:) 3047:| 2996:) 2992:| 2971:) 2967:- 2953:) 2949:- 2937:- 2904:) 2900:| 2880:) 2846:) 2842:| 2765:) 2761:| 2743:| 2715:| 2677:) 2673:| 2656:) 2621:) 2586:) 2561:) 2527:) 2470:) 2466:| 2412:. 2378:) 2350:) 2346:| 2321:) 2297:) 2293:| 2268:) 2232:) 2228:| 2207:) 2160:. 2116:) 2090:) 2079:. 2057:) 2043:) 2039:| 1982:) 1943:) 1920:) 1916:- 1881:) 1867:) 1863:| 1843:) 1839:• 1787:) 1783:| 1747:) 1743:| 1704:) 1700:| 1643:) 1629:}} 1623:{{ 1586:) 1582:| 1523:) 1488:) 1454:) 1450:| 1393:) 1389:| 1352:) 1348:| 1260:) 1256:| 1238:) 1234:| 1226:. 1165:) 1161:| 1140:) 1116:→ 1111:– 1091:) 1087:| 1044:is 1026:) 968:) 964:| 934:) 907:) 903:| 888:) 862:) 828:) 824:| 809:) 794:) 782:Hi 774:) 770:| 745:) 741:• 704:) 700:- 652:) 648:- 614:) 610:| 576:) 572:- 545:) 541:| 518:) 514:- 490:) 486:- 463:) 459:| 443:) 439:- 394:) 390:| 374:) 366:• 320:vf 316:ko 304:, 300:, 256:) 244:? 233:) 183:. 137:}} 131:{{ 122:) 94:→ 64:← 6578:( 6522:( 6501:( 6461:X 6443:/ 6435:/ 6396:( 6328:( 6288:( 6259:( 6240:( 6208:( 6176:( 6150:✉ 6117:( 6092:✉ 6053:( 6034:( 6010:( 5975:( 5949:( 5935:( 5912:( 5896:. 5856:( 5831:( 5811:( 5782:( 5765:( 5736:( 5707:( 5666:( 5627:( 5575:( 5557:' 5524:( 5491:( 5466:( 5441:( 5424:( 5366:( 5265:( 5233:( 5212:( 5180:( 5127:( 5096:( 5052:✉ 5016:( 4989:( 4951:( 4916:( 4904:. 4894:) 4886:( 4800:( 4757:( 4733:( 4711:( 4673:( 4621:( 4578:( 4561:( 4468:( 4420:( 4393:✉ 4366:( 4344:✉ 4307:( 4285:( 4231:( 4192:( 4154:( 4106:| 4077:( 4060:( 4028:( 4014:( 4000:( 3982:( 3953:( 3936:( 3905:✉ 3878:( 3860:✉ 3788:( 3721:( 3703:( 3681:( 3650:✉ 3587:( 3572:✉ 3544:( 3518:✉ 3474:( 3407:( 3375:( 3357:( 3321:( 3295:( 3267:( 3242:( 3200:( 3164:( 3133:' 3083:( 3043:( 3021:✉ 2988:( 2963:( 2945:( 2933:( 2896:( 2876:( 2838:( 2757:( 2669:( 2651:· 2646:( 2617:( 2582:( 2557:( 2523:( 2489:✉ 2462:( 2425:✉ 2374:( 2342:( 2317:( 2289:( 2264:( 2224:( 2203:( 2112:( 2053:( 2035:( 2026:· 2021:( 2000:· 1995:( 1978:( 1939:( 1912:( 1877:( 1859:( 1835:( 1779:( 1739:( 1696:( 1639:( 1578:( 1554:X 1519:( 1484:( 1446:( 1437:· 1432:( 1411:) 1407:( 1385:( 1376:· 1371:( 1344:( 1318:) 1314:( 1286:) 1282:( 1252:( 1230:( 1208:) 1204:( 1190:· 1185:( 1157:( 1136:( 1109:) 1105:( 1083:( 1077:' 1061:X 1022:( 960:( 930:( 899:( 884:( 858:( 820:( 805:( 790:( 766:( 737:( 696:( 644:( 606:( 568:( 537:( 510:( 482:( 455:( 435:( 386:( 370:@ 362:^ 358:( 337:☯ 335:M 333:☺ 331:C 329:☮ 327:T 325:❤ 322:) 318:a 296:( 252:( 229:( 197:X 153:X 118:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index