279:
to the other article was because I thought that it read better. I came across it when trying to figure out where you were at. That's all. Regarding your initial edit, you deleted everything. There is relevant information about the judges decision. It is now balanced by the addition of other sources. I took nothing away, how can more information be bad?.. The sockpuppet added information that doesn't relate to the sources cited, and a lot of suppositions. I left that. I thought if others are happy, I'll just add for balancing, from verifiable sources. That is NOT spin. No-one else had a problem with my additions for a month. You deleted everything, I feel that that is disruptive. I was not paid for editing, and may have previously misunderstood the guidelines, but apparently one can fix a problem with an article, if it's declared, when I understood I did explain why. Please see my reply. Everything is verifiable, so there is no reason or justification for deleting everything. If you read through you'll see that there was insufficiency in the original artical, with omission, and incomplete information, and inaccurate quotes. I don't understand why you don't think that a reader can understand both sides with the benefit of all the information to hand. I don't want an argument. I'm not familiar with
Knowledge, but I'm actually trying to make good additions. It's a shame you just felt the need to delete it all without leaving the up to date information.
147:
337:
419:
189:
274:"If there is a problem with an article about yourself, a family member, a friend or a colleague, please read Biographies of living persons/Help. If you spot a problem with an article, you can fix it directly, by clicking on the "Edit" link at the top of that page. See the "edit an article" section of this page for more information. "
278:
All additional information is verifiable sources. It is not spin. That is hurtful and untrue. Other editors included in the development of this article clearly were happy for the edits to remain. They are not meant to be disruptive, they add additional information about the judges findings. The edit
21:
Hi
ErraticDrumlin, generally we avoid listing a nationality if there is significant ambiguity with that, for example born in X, represents Y. While there are some different angles for Musah, he was born in and now represents the U.S., so I'd probably go for that if anything. There would no harm in
62:
Consider re-writing the lead as both reference 2 and 5 state there were 15 people altogether onboard, the lead says 6 crew, 10 staff plus their families - this may lead people to believe there were more people on board - Thanks for the in-depth interesting
81:
Thank you for reviewing and for your comments! Yes I'll try and sharpen up the lead a bit more, the sources which say there 15/18 on board were from the day of the crash so were later corrected, so its a bit confusing. But I'll try and
298:
sorry, I just saw your comments in the talk page. The "somehow managed to find them guilty" is a direct quote from Mr Clegg KC who was a central figure in the original trial and successful appeals. It's not a personal commentary
464:
232:
334:
448:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
216:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
22:
excluding the nationality if you feel there is a significant clash with his upbringing and youth football, as it's not relevant to his notability either. There's no hard and fast rules really.
433:
202:
341:
162:
is a
Brilliant article that reveals a history not usually discussed. Well done for putting this together. Brilliant resource for the many suffragettes in Knowledge.
159:
45:
487:
255:
398:
379:
397:
I was being sarcastic!shockingly
Goldster actually sounds like a shit idea and it's CEO!a grease slings creepy old fella!sorry mate
483:
251:
320:
I've had to tell someone about your comments and dominating. It's made me very uncomfortable. It very much feels personal.
457:
225:
90:
469:
237:
364:
349:
325:
304:
284:
104:
402:
383:
129:
445:
213:
167:
121:
Please double check your formatting, organisation, and maths - I've sorted out your various mistakes at
378:
from
Scotland to China and loving Germany!..hi could you tell me more about "Goldster"it sounds great
360:
345:
321:
300:
280:
368:
97:
51:
314:
427:
196:
126:
476:
441:
244:
209:
163:
27:
456:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
224:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
146:
453:
221:
449:
359:
don't know if I've done this correctly, but I've attempted very much to let you know
217:
55:
122:
418:
188:
23:
491:
406:
387:
329:
308:
288:
259:
171:
132:
111:
31:
315:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents
460:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
228:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
437:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
206:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
344:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
353:
473:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
241:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
463:
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
431:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All
231:
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
200:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
444:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
212:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
83:
78:
72:
68:
67:To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with
342:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
60:
37:I have sent you a note about a page you started
354:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/User:ErraticDrumlin
54:, while examining this page as a part of our
8:
183:
71:. Please remember to sign your reply with
160:Suffragette bombing and arson campaign
7:
428:2023 Arbitration Committee elections
197:2021 Arbitration Committee elections
412:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
340:There is currently a discussion at
180:ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
46:1990 Faucett PerĂș 727 disappearance
14:
93:tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
417:
335:
187:
145:
467:and submit your choices on the
235:and submit your choices on the
393:Goldster actually sounds crap!
58:, had the following comments:
1:
492:01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
446:Knowledge arbitration process
407:03:08, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
260:01:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
214:Knowledge arbitration process
112:20:29, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
32:07:55, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
388:00:59, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
352:) 16:12, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
133:22:27, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
89:(Message delivered via the
510:
484:MediaWiki message delivery
369:16:12, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
330:16:06, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
309:19:13, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
289:18:51, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
252:MediaWiki message delivery
144:
481:to your user talk page.
249:to your user talk page.
172:07:28, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
117:Career statistics tables
44:Thank you for creating
65:
41:Hello, ErraticDrumlin
442:Arbitration Committee
425:Hello! Voting in the
210:Arbitration Committee
194:Hello! Voting in the
153:The Original Barnstar
79:{{Re|Joseywales1961}}
69:{{Re|Joseywales1961}}
56:page curation process
138:A barnstar for you!
52:User:Joseywales1961
458:arbitration policy
226:arbitration policy
494:
267:
266:
262:
177:
176:
94:
501:
482:
480:
421:
339:
338:
250:
248:
191:
184:
149:
142:
141:
109:
102:
88:
85:
80:
74:
70:
509:
508:
504:
503:
502:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
474:
422:
414:
395:
376:
361:Beautiful Rosie
357:
346:Beautiful Rosie
336:
322:Beautiful Rosie
318:
301:Beautiful Rosie
296:
281:Beautiful Rosie
272:
242:
182:
140:
119:
105:
98:
39:
19:
12:
11:
5:
507:
505:
465:the candidates
434:eligible users
423:
416:
415:
413:
410:
394:
391:
375:
372:
356:
333:
317:
312:
295:
292:
277:
271:
268:
265:
264:
233:the candidates
203:eligible users
192:
181:
178:
175:
174:
156:
155:
150:
139:
136:
118:
115:
38:
35:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
506:
495:
493:
489:
485:
478:
472:
471:
466:
461:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
438:
436:
435:
430:
429:
420:
411:
409:
408:
404:
400:
399:80.43.237.201
392:
390:
389:
385:
381:
380:80.43.237.201
373:
371:
370:
366:
362:
355:
351:
347:
343:
332:
331:
327:
323:
316:
313:
311:
310:
306:
302:
293:
291:
290:
286:
282:
275:
269:
263:
261:
257:
253:
246:
240:
239:
234:
229:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
205:
204:
199:
198:
193:
190:
186:
185:
179:
173:
169:
165:
161:
158:
157:
154:
151:
148:
143:
137:
135:
134:
131:
128:
124:
116:
114:
113:
110:
108:
103:
101:
95:
92:
91:Page Curation
86:
76:
64:
59:
57:
53:
49:
47:
42:
36:
34:
33:
29:
25:
16:
468:
462:
439:
432:
426:
424:
396:
377:
358:
319:
297:
276:
273:
236:
230:
207:
201:
195:
152:
123:Nathan Trott
120:
106:
99:
96:
87:
77:
66:
61:
50:
43:
40:
20:
470:voting page
238:voting page
164:Victuallers
17:Yinus Musah
454:topic bans
374:"Goldster"
222:topic bans
450:site bans
218:site bans
82:clarify.
63:article!
477:NoACEMM
245:NoACEMM
130:Snowman
100:JW 1961
24:Kosack
127:Giant
488:talk
440:The
403:talk
384:talk
365:talk
350:talk
326:talk
305:talk
285:talk
256:talk
208:The
168:talk
107:Talk
84:~~~~
73:~~~~
28:talk
294:Coi
270:Coi
490:)
479:}}
475:{{
452:,
405:)
386:)
367:)
328:)
307:)
287:)
258:)
247:}}
243:{{
220:,
170:)
125:.
75:.
48:.
30:)
486:(
401:(
382:(
363:(
348:(
324:(
303:(
283:(
254:(
166:(
26:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
