Knowledge

User talk:Etaripcisum

Source đź“ť

161: 129: 249: 22: 77:
on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit
286:
My apologies, but that accusation is rather vague; were you referring to my edit on “Knowledge”? If so, please elaborate as I’m very new to editing and don’t know a lot of the rules yet. Thank you.
133: 36:. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the 45: 212: 193: 37: 201: 53: 205: 57: 262: 169: 113: 65: 301:
Yes, I was referring to that edit. No, we're not stupid and we know you're trying to play a game. Stop it.
186: 182: 178: 137: 70: 49: 48:
for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant
33: 287: 132:
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
109: 257: 197: 41: 145: 87: 306: 272: 218: 160: 74: 141: 83: 302: 268: 82:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 44:
among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See
248: 21: 228: 310: 295: 276: 236: 149: 117: 91: 211:
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
105: 101: 29: 215:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: 73:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three 159: 20: 200:. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek 100:
you have reached 4RR. Did you even look at the article on
136:
regarding a possible violation of Knowledge's policy on
97: 64:
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being
204:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 56:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary 185:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to 134:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring 40:to work toward making a version that represents 104:? It describes legalisms in no way relevant to 80:even if you don't violate the three-revert rule 123:Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion 8: 32:shows that you are currently engaged in an 192:During a dispute, you should first try to 7: 14: 247: 127: 69:—especially if you violate the 28:Your recent editing history at 1: 237:21:31, 27 December 2017 (UTC) 194:discuss controversial changes 173:from editing for a period of 150:21:29, 27 December 2017 (UTC) 118:21:28, 27 December 2017 (UTC) 92:21:19, 27 December 2017 (UTC) 311:23:52, 14 January 2018 (UTC) 296:19:10, 14 January 2018 (UTC) 277:18:49, 14 January 2018 (UTC) 260:Knowledge again, you may be 327: 213:guide to appealing blocks 187:make useful contributions 291: 265:without further notice 164: 25: 223:Your reason here ~~~~ 163: 24: 263:blocked from editing 66:blocked from editing 202:dispute resolution 181:and violating the 165: 54:dispute resolution 26: 183:three-revert rule 71:three-revert rule 318: 251: 233: 226: 140:. Thank you. 131: 130: 326: 325: 321: 320: 319: 317: 316: 315: 284: 245: 240: 239: 231: 216: 209: 206:page protection 190: 157: 128: 125: 110:Just plain Bill 58:page protection 19: 12: 11: 5: 324: 322: 314: 313: 283: 280: 244: 241: 210: 191: 167:You have been 166: 158: 156: 153: 124: 121: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 323: 312: 308: 304: 300: 299: 298: 297: 293: 289: 281: 279: 278: 274: 270: 266: 264: 259: 255: 252:This is your 250: 242: 238: 235: 234: 224: 220: 214: 207: 203: 199: 195: 188: 184: 180: 176: 172: 171: 162: 155:December 2017 154: 152: 151: 147: 143: 139: 135: 122: 120: 119: 115: 111: 107: 103: 99: 94: 93: 89: 85: 81: 76: 72: 68: 67: 61: 59: 55: 51: 47: 43: 39: 35: 31: 23: 17:December 2017 16: 285: 261: 254:only warning 253: 246: 243:January 2018 229: 222: 179:edit warring 174: 168: 138:edit warring 126: 95: 79: 63: 62: 27: 288:Etaripcisum 50:noticeboard 258:vandalize 256:; if you 198:consensus 196:and seek 98:this edit 42:consensus 38:talk page 282:Question 221:|reason= 175:24 hours 142:Favonian 106:quantity 102:property 84:Favonian 78:warring— 52:or seek 34:edit war 30:Quantity 303:ElKevbo 269:ElKevbo 219:unblock 170:blocked 75:reverts 96:With 307:talk 292:talk 273:talk 230:Neil 177:for 146:talk 114:talk 88:talk 267:. 227:. 60:. 46:BRD 309:) 294:) 275:) 225:}} 217:{{ 189:. 148:) 116:) 108:. 90:) 305:( 290:( 271:( 232:N 208:. 144:( 112:( 86:(

Index

Stop icon
Quantity
edit war
talk page
consensus
BRD
noticeboard
dispute resolution
page protection
blocked from editing
three-revert rule
reverts
Favonian
talk
21:19, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
this edit
property
quantity
Just plain Bill
talk
21:28, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring
edit warring
Favonian
talk
21:29, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Stop icon with clock
blocked
edit warring
three-revert rule

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑