1759:
that you don't really think very highly of any of the work that I do, even if you claim you "appreciate it". In the end this comes of (to me at least) as an example of one editor thinking they know the only right way and trying to force that without anyone asking them to. You're pretty much the only person I've come across that's taken such an issue to the content I've added and felt they needed to be hidden away until you or someone likeminded could fix it in the style that you like. Much like you said to me, I'm not going to try to hinder you form turning more articles into drafts but I don't like it and I don't see the benefits from it. Again, sorry if my work looks that bad to you and I hope my future work won't be as bothersome, but I can't change how I function and I'm not about to give up the joy I get from editing
Knowledge (XXG) my way, and I really don't see the harm in it so unless more people feel I'm being disruptive or am having a negative impact I think I'll go on to do things the way I work. I don't agree that what I'm going is poor conduct.
1778:
someone really cares about the article that they will work on it and improve it. It's not saying "this is bad and has to go to AfC," it's just an easy way to keep track of stuff that needs to be touched up. I also move stuff to draft because I may not have the energy or time at the present moment to improve it, but I will when I do have the time as I did at JJ. I also am sure to tag stuff I move with the comics WP draft class so that I can keep track of it that way as well. I wouldn't say that I "keep track" of your edits, but like I said you do have a habit of leaving poorly-formatted tables and blank sections in articles. That's different than a stub that is just lacking information in general.
319:"To efface the PJI's history of virulent anti-LGBT campaigning": PJI was founded 20 years ago and most of their casework is based on First Amendment and religious freedom issue such as prayer in schools, In God We Trust, proselytizing, Christian Bible clubs at public schools, etc. You cited UNDUE. Ironically, for the article to be DUE, this work with regards to the First Amendment and religious freedom must be covered in the article. In other words, your blanking of the article created inbalance. Your statement "devotes much time and energy" is let's just say an exaggeration.
1746:
off. It's clear that you have a bias against how I edit and I'd like to see some motivation for that beyond the fact that you think it looks ugly and incomplete, all articles are works in progress and beyond the fact that there are some empty headings sometimes where is the big harm? Where is the guideline that says that it's ok move a bunch of obviously notable subjects away from the mainspace and just leave them there (again, unless you intend to fix all of them yourself you're essentially leaving them in the
466:
2747:
294:
phrasing) only mentioned the PJI in a passing context as well. To efface the PJI's history of virulent anti-LGBT campaigning, to which it devotes much time and energy, especially when the bulk of the "biased sources" I cited came from newspapers and the PJI's website itself, is unacceptable. Perhaps there is some middle ground to be found, but the article in its previous state falls far short of
Knowledge (XXG) standards concerning hate groups.
31:
312:"indiscriminate listing of cases...only mentioned the PJI in a passing context": in a legal article when an attorney represents a litigant the entire case, as well as its precedents if any, becomes relevant for the article of the attorney. Since PJI represented the litigant, that makes the case relevant to this article, thus not indiscriminate. For an example of how representing a litigant makes the case relevant see
1742:
advice you to quit doing that because it just makes the encyclopedia lesser and makes fewer people aware of the content. And again, how is putting the articles into draft space better than just working on them in mainspace? You still havn't explained that to me in any good way. How do more people get the chance to work on an article that's tucked away in the sites hidden depts that almost no one ever visits?
1256:
3389:
1375:
1110:
1695:
they're bad and remove them from mainspace for weird and poor reasons that as far as I know are just based on your own feelings on them. Again, are you going to fix every single one of them and make sure to put them back? And by what personal standard do you judge them to be "complete" Would it be better if I just ignored to put in the sections at all? Do you remove all stubs you see?
1455:
3586:
3433:
2911:
2638:
2595:
2027:
193:
2259:
1511:
1329:
635:
362:
3020:
3057:
The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at
2080:
with claims of "MCNY does not hold copyright on digital images. No other assertion of copyright." or "No assertion of copyright in publication." Failure to assert copyright by a museum or repository does not make an image "free": copyright is general held by the original creator and in the U.S. it is
1709:
I respect where you come from, but you can't proffer your disability as an excuse for poor conduct. It's one thing to leave stubs up--that's not what the issue is here. I'm talking about articles that are legitimately incomplete--like with headings with no text underneath. If that's how you prefer to
881:
Thank you for your prompt answer, and also for reviewing the page a second time. However - I still don’t understand: Why you say that (for instance) my
Cotterill and Eglen (2018) reference is a non-independent source? I never even heard of these two guys until I saw their article - and the journal
3132:
have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not
2175:
does not bear upon the images' underlying copyright: the publisher may well have acquired permission from the rights holder or museum, as is the case in most commercial publications. And note you can't change licenses to CC-BY because only the copyright holder can choose the license. The easiest way
1881:
back to the mainspace. I strongly disagree that articles should be moved to draftspace solely because they are incomplete, especially one year after they were created. We have a ton of stubs that are incomplete in the mainspace and that is fine. The article as it is is not violating any of
Knowledge
1745:
I also never accused you of being malicious (I think most of the time you've been nice to me, if a bit dismissive of my ways) just that you clearly don't respect the way I like to do things based on your own POV and that you self-admited that you think that I "have a pattern" that you've kept track
1176:
Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins
1066:
It wouldn't surprise me but since we can't know that, we can say for sure that they reverted me once and you once. So the next one will be three and the one after a violation of the WP:3RR bright line. Of course my hope as it seems to be yours is that they take heed and improve their editing. Best,
2180:
published, check for valid copyright notice, and then, subsequent renewal after the required legal period. Demonstrable failure on either of those would make a good case for PD. The default assumption should be that something is in copyright unless there is credible evidence to the contrary. It is
2143:
The problem is that
Knowledge (XXG) hardly qualifies as "personal use": it's not just a website, or school project, and posting material here violates non-commercial use: when material is posted it can immediately be viewed, downloaded, and reused by anyone in the world, for any purpose, including
1802:
I've said it a bunch of times: Moving incomplete articles to draft is common procedure. It gets incomplete articles out of mainspace, provides an easy way of tracking articles to improve, and shows which articles have editors that care about them and want to improve them. As per the table comment,
1758:
As far as the JJ article goes, there is no timelimit on
Knowledge (XXG), and the stuff that you added could have just been added while it was an article so why not just do that? And the fact that you keep saying "keep doing that if you want to, I can't stop you" just makes a good case for the fact
928:
Thank you again - I guess my main problem is not that the Legéndy citations are automatically unreliable but that there are too many of them. Well - that is an easy one to remedy: I can remove them altogether from the "is best known for" section (and replace them with third-party references), and
1777:
I think that I can succinctly say the following: Personally (from new page reviewing), if an article is incomplete (by which I mean large swathes of blank content, not a stub), I move it to draft first. That's a good way of getting half-finished stuff outside of the mainspace as well as seeing if
904:
I am going to be going on a research trip shortly so I will likely not respond as quickly, so I will say this. The larger issue, and the reason why the page has not been approved has little to do with whether or not one source is or is not reliable. The problem is the self-published nature of the
1787:
None of my tables are ever poorly formated, at the worst they're not all filled out. And again, I don't feel like you've done a good job at adressing my points very well. You've yet to explain to me how putting somehting in a draft really helps it at all, you keep saying it does but none of your
1754:
I just don't see the logic in how the articles are different from stubs. That makes less than zero sense to me, why don't you just remove the heading if they bother you and you think a full stub would be better? I'm sorry, I don't mean to come off as obtuse but I just don't grasp why it would be
1694:
article you even removed a bunch of stuff I had on each individual issue for no good reason. It's the same thing as the
Punsiehr article, how does it ever help to remove a bunch of sources. Makes. No. Sense. You say it isn't personal but you still clearly go around and follow my articles and say
1522:. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at
1340:. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at
646:. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at
1741:
And I don't have own issues, I have an issue with people straight up just removing stuff from the site and putting them in limbo for no good reason completly based on their own feelings. Can you cite some guidelines that says that it's wrong to work on articles the way I like to? If not the I'd
1517:
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files)
1335:
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files)
641:
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files)
2085:
publication that determines when an image falls into public domain. Subsequent republication or posting of the image does not change initial copyright unless copyright is explicitly renewed or the rights are transferred or explicitly released into the public domain or under a free license. See
911:
Self-published sources and other published sources of dubious reliability may be used as sources in articles about themselves ... so long as the material is neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim does not involve claims about third parties does not involve claims about events not
1750:
that someone will one day take an interest in them). All it does it make me potentially forget about them because I keep track of articles by checking navboxes and categories and searching for them in the searchbar, something which can't be done with drafts, I'm sure tons of other people find
800:
Dear
Edzedek24 — I am aware of the added responsibility associated with COI editing, and it is true that 10 out of my 15 inline references are self-published - however, the rest are reliable third-party references, and they do meet WP:RS. (I listed some of them when I responded to the last
1488:, this is old news, but it would be SO nice if you'd stop trying to browbeat editors into submission. And if you would stop using the word "censorship" so inappropriately. We're a website here, writing up interesting things--Etzedek was hardly preventing someone from using their free speech.
293:
The page's sourcing was a joke. Not only did many of the sources not match up with the prose they were cited in context of (for example, only including PJI on a list with no other context), but many of the sources, especially with the indiscriminate listing of cases (which contained non-NPOV
2165:"Permission to use an image is based on the rights stated on the invoice or permission form. No image may be distorted in any way, whether by rotation, inversion, change of proportion, color alteration, superimposition, animation or any other method without prior approval from the Museum"
2197:
to explaining the article subject, etc. I hate to see good images deleted, so I suggest you ask the community at the
Commons Copyright Village Pump for possible more legal loopholes, but I fear that with existing documentation the images just won't stand up to a challenge. All the best,
1180:
Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active
918:
10 out of 15 (at last count, I may be mistaken) qualifies, in my opinion as the primary basis of the article. Another editor may feel differently, but after reviewing the article again, and brushing up on the autobiography/COI policy, I'm still a firm no on the article at this point.
528:
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right may be revoked by an administrator.
1212:
will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial
1727:
Furthermore, with the JJ article, you hadn't edited it since
October of last year, and it was in dire need of updating in any case. If you want to put the table of issue reception in, again I can't stop you. I just think that long tables creep into indiscriminate list territory.
2133:
If this means I need to update the templates from PD to CC BY 3.0 or fair use, let me know. With regard to the image from the book, I have gone back and checked the sourcing and am confident that image remains in the public domain as it was published without a copyright notice.
2549:
to learn how to do Harvard referencing for your book sources. That way, you can print a short list of book sources in a bibliography, and the notes would each consist of a few words and automatically direct to the bibliography. If you need help on that, drop me a line. Best,
1917:
If you want to move articles back to the draftspace that have already been reviewed and been in the mainspace for awhile just because they need to be expanded, I highly recommend you at least start a discussion somewhere first because such moves are extremely controversial.
3264:: Is requesting revdel complicated and time consuming? This script helps simplify the process. Just have the Copyvio source URL and go to the history page and collect your diff IDs and you can drop them into the script Popups and it will create a revdel request for you.
2541:
3. Cited hook. You only provided the cite on the nomination template. I added the cite to the lead, which is the only place this hook fact appears. That surprised me; I think you should say that it was the first further down in the article, and move the cite there.
1714:. You're a fairly experienced editor, so I feel that I shouldn't have to say that you don't own your articles. I also resent the accusation that this is personal--that's ludicrous. I improve articles as I find them. In this case, I was doing article assessments for
3140:
If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear
1622:
OK, I messed up the redirect. Mistakes happen. I gleaned that from the edit summary, there was no need to leave me an entire paragraph for that. Thanks for the pointers on DABs. I don't do a lot of work on those types of pages so I wasn't aware. But, then again,
1282:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
3548:
2840:
865:. The sources on the page itself, as before, do not credibly indicate notability due to the overwhelming level of non-independence of the sources. Hence the much higher level of scrutiny. The article needs more verifiable third-party references. Sorry, but
3092:
1056:
Are they only two away? That was the second time by WikiClock today that they had removed the redirect, but I could be wrong. I have a sneaking suspicion that they're also the IP that removed the redirect earlier so I suppose we'll see what happens.
2801:, thank you so much (or should I say...vielen Dank)! I'm glad to see the running around has been noticed. Fortuitous that you should award this today, as I just got notified of my scholarship acceptance to attend the North American WikiConference!
2810:
I like these coincidences, enjoy! - This was due at least 2 days ago, but never before has it happened that three articles that I reviewed for DYK appeared one day, and then all three by users not called precious so far. I look for one a day ;)
3529:
1807:
I removed from the JJ article. The columns are far too wide for the amount of text that is put in them and it disrupts the structure of the article. That's what I mean by poorly formatted. Not filled out is different--that's easier to manage.
1519:
1337:
643:
1831:
Also, I hope you take the time to upload the images again that you're going to get deleted since they can't stay in the draft. Since I live in Europe and risk having my rights to upload copyrighted images soon I might not be able to do it
3077:
1170:
704:
which I edit regularly... is there a reason for that? I've put references from each of her comics appearances and the page currently has 22 references. I'd love more information on what you're looking for in terms of citation. :) Thanks!
3186:
is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at
821:“ . . . the Poisson surprise method is one of the most widely used burst detection methods since its development over thirty years ago (398 citations as of June 2018) and is still commonly used for analysing bursting activity . . .”
3340:
You were the one that reverted my edit. I engaged in BRD, and instead of discussing it with me you just call me annoying? Don't cover up the fact that you haven't been able to offer a solid rationale for reverting my edits by being a
2426:
Thank you for your suggestions on how to improve the Rachel Zoll Knowledge (XXG) article. Please examine the latest version to see if it meets notability requirements in your opinion. Please consider removing the deletion template.
275:
PJI is a legal organization so it naturally contains summaries of court cases. You removed this well sourced content and replaced it with trivia from a biased source. That is not how Knowledge (XXG) works. Not in the slightest. –
1673:, it was off mainspace for about a day, maybe not even that, and it's much improved for it. It's nothing personal, I think moving these articles that have incomplete or empty sections to drafts helps ensure a better end product.
1474:
from editing Knowledge (XXG). Content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Removing high-quality, verified sources such as Los Angeles Times, San Francisco Chronicle, The Washington Post is disruptive.–
1646:
Do you think that moving these articles that I have made to drafts actually help them get better? Moving them to drafts does nothing but make less people aware of them and less accessible. Unless you intend to fix them all by
3254:: Creates a scrolling new pages list at the left side of the page. You can change the number of pages shown by adding the following to the next line on your common.js page (immediately after the line importing this script):
2847:
I think you're probably right to go with the character's surname, Date. With works of fiction we use whatever is the character's common name in those works (as opposed to non-fiction biographies which almost always use the
829:, a well-known contributor to psychology and neuroscience (with two Knowledge (XXG) articles devoted to him), cites the Legéndy (1967) brain capacity estimate in a 1976 paper (my ref. 6), right up-front in the Introduction.
582:
I'm not sure if this will impact your decision, but I'd like to mention that Kudpung reversed their decision and granted me NPP rights after conversing. I feel that I have a pretty good grasp of policies thus far. Thanks,
2159:"In some cases, the Museum owns only the physical object and does not assume copyright ownership... clearing copyright and any other rights that may be vested in an image is entirely the responsibility of the researcher."
1751:
articles that way too, as a matter of fact I think most people do, so again how does putting them into limbo like that make people more likely to find them and improve them? Tons of drafts stay drafts for years and years.
1191:
Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the
742:
Hi there. we are trying our best to write this in a way that is not promotional, we simply want a page. Can you please explain exactly what is wrong with the page? or what should we do to get this approved? - Pooktwo
2127:
or for study. Each image must be accompanied by the following credit line: / Museum of the City of New York. . If the image will be posted online, please provide a link back to the catalog record in the collections
3247:
into an empty line, now you can install all other scripts with the click of a button from the script page! (Note you need to be at the ".js" page for the script for the install button to appear, not the information
2892:
No, I very much appreciate the feedback. I'm kind of just going off of my general copy-editing background, and am still working at mixing in the MOS stuff, as you noted. Thanks for your suggestions and kind words!
1710:
work, fine, I can't stop you. But if you're going to put articles together and leave them unfinished, you should really do that in draftspace. As a side note, I'm not a fan of the way you talk about articles that
1286:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
3290:
to the next line on your common.js, the prompt will pop up automatically if a page has no Wikiproject templates on the talk page (note: this can be a bit annoying if you review redirects or dab pages commonly).
1737:
I'm not using my ADHD as an excuse, it's just an explanation. And it's not much of a disability by the way, my mind just works differently and I wouldn't be able to do a lot of stuff I enjoy if I didn't have
3090:
predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's
2170:
What this boils down to is that the Museum restricts use beyond personal, and simply does not claim copyright of material it does not have rights to. And similarly, the inclusion of images in Mendes (2015),
2449:
The deletion template cannot be removed unless I withdraw the nomination (which I won't unless the consensus changes). The page isn't encyclopedic, and is just a list of accolades with excessive citations.
1279:
1526:, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
1344:, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
650:, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the
2870:
I did some minor ce for these points and a little for conciseness. But I'm being picky, for a C-class article your copy edit was plenty thorough. Please let me know if you have any questions. –
2773:
305:"sources not match up with the prose they were cited": I checked half of the article and the sources state that PJI represented a litigant in the particular legal matter. Sourcing is verified per
1882:(XXG)'s policies. Yes, new articles are sometimes moved back to draftspace during by new page reviewers if they are sorely lacking, but this article is not sorely lacking, nor is it a new page.
374:
1669:
Trek, I appreciate the good work and dedication you have to your work on here, but you have a pattern of leaving incomplete articles up that isn't acceptable. Since I think you're referring to
3115:
3128:
Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they
785:. If the page does not meet those guidelines, as it's done twice, (for copyright, unambiguous promotion, and no indication of significance), then the page will be deleted again. Cheers,
681:, thanks for accepting my first article on the English Knowledge (XXG). I'm truly humbled to see my contributions are being taken quite serious with you. Til next time, stay blessed!--
3301:
1224:
1214:
84:
333:
Your comments and behavior betray your bias and POV. Such as removing the LA Times and replacing it with Youtube. Are you here to build an encyclopedia or to push an LGBT agenda?
773:
as they were the admin who deleted the page. However, I will say that you cannot "simply have a page," your organization or product must meet notability guidelines as laid out
3212:
provides a lot of the same functionality as the page curation tools, and some reviewers prefer to use the Twinkle tools for some/all tasks. It can be activated simply in the
2952:
1150:
Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
382:
524:
Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.
3629:
3478:
2608:
322:" falls far short of Knowledge (XXG) standards concerning hate groups": Knowledge (XXG) has no "standards" concerning hate groups. In any event PJI is a well established
2685:
805:
did not answer my response, and has since then deleted it.) The following supporting remarks are meant to go with the three "best known for" items in my introduction:
1427:
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
1690:, how does it conceivably ever help to remove a subject from the mainspace? I don't buy that the way you like to do thing helpp in the mildest, in the case of the
2220:
Hi Etzedek24, thanks for withdrawing the speedy delete on the Krentz article—needed just a bit more than two minutes to add more sources & justification. ;) -
2034:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
1581:
or redirected to a similar disambiguation page. If the original title still redirects to the new one, then the disambiguation was for nothing in the first place.
200:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
508:
518:
You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
3075:
now has a new "Articles for Creation" option which will show drafts instead of articles in the feed, this shouldn't impact NPP activities and is part of the
1390:
1368:
1268:
499:
1302:
HI. I'm here to urge you to take a little time to improve this page. Thake a look at my comment at AfD. That bill is sufficient impact to make this a
3648:
if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
3497:
if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
2971:
if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
2704:
if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
3277:
2087:
1400:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply
3101:
1518:
normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
1336:
normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
642:
normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to
3396:
for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
2534:
2145:
2858:
Foreign words generally get italics. The guideline is that foreign loanwords not common in everyday non-specialized English should be italicized (
1566:
727:
I'll give it a once over again and see what I remember--I think it was the Other versions/In other media sections that I was referring to. Cheers,
2855:) which essentially places punctuation on the outside of the quotation unless it is actually part of the quotation. This also applies to titles.
2753:
385:
or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
3251:
2481:
I don't want to be on bad terms with you. I'm sorry if I was very rude during our last interaction. I know I have problems with overreacting.
128:. Normally, there needs to be discussion at an article's Talk page before initiating an Rfc, and just wanted you to know that I listed it at
3383:
2375:
Whoops, I didn't think that I actually clicked patrol on that page. I was going through sources and must have done it accidentally. My bad.
2021:
187:
3623:
3309:
1459:
3645:
3494:
2968:
2701:
1718:
and came across the articles. None of this is malicious. If I put an article in draftspace, it shoots up the priority list for improving.
2348:
2237:
No problem. If it were me, I'd make the page in userspace and then move it to main once I've gotten sources and notability criteria in.
1569:. And if you do move a page because disambiguation is needed (i.e. there are other articles with the same name), as you did when moving
1396:
In accordance with our policy that Knowledge (XXG) is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
981:
page did not credibly indicate the subject's notability and read more like a resume than an encyclopedic entry, thus, it was deleted. --
1565:
for "more specific link" when no other page with the same title exists. For comics, the specific naming conventions can be found here:
2073:
1169:
which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at
1531:
1349:
655:
552:
3236:
2621:
2035:
3191:. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.
2569:. If the images are indeed ineligible, they must be removed before the DYK hook hits the main page. I have opened a discussion at
2123:"Researchers may use, free of charge, copies of low-resolution images from the Collections Portal for non-commercial use, such as
1971:
Nice work on this article. I have a couple print sources that might be useful to expand it some more (A Wertham-centric issue of
3217:
3023:
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
2326:
3305:
2095:
370:
2836:
2723:
2225:
2176:
to prove Public Domain for post-1923 works (and it is not always easy) is to find a book or periodical where the images were
1682:
Since when do you need to make a perfect article each time? You can make stubs if you feel like it as long as the subject is
1263:
1247:
239:
83:
992:
592:
All good, I'd still recommend spending a bit of time at both places though. Good luck and thanks for joining the project. —
2120:
I appreciate your vigilance with regard to these images, and I will be updating the ones from the MCNY. Per their website,
853:
Thanks for reaching out to me. However, I still stand by my declination. I reviewed the page a second time, and agree with
758:
66:
3593:
3440:
3280:: Creates links next to the title of each page which show up if it has been previously deleted or nominated for deletion.
2918:
2645:
2149:
1686:. This is how I like to work, I work in periods of spurts, it's part of my ADHD, if you don't like it you can add to the
1523:
1341:
647:
491:
480:, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
334:
3267:
2408:
2069:
2017:
2010:
1849:. Also, have you made sure to remove all the redlinks from navboxes and such since redlinks aren't meant to be on those?
1471:
1272:
1030:
Thanks for resorting the redirect. I saw your warning on their page and a heads up that they are two reverts away from
556:
495:
3100:
There are a number of coordination tasks for New Page Patrol that could use some help from experienced reviewers. See
2945:
2279:
1504:
1233:
610:
596:
577:
563:
327:
313:
929:
remove about half of them, in a similar way, from the rest of the text - would that make the page more acceptable?
486:. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encylopedia. If you have not already done so, you
3649:
3635:
3498:
3484:
3397:
3330:
3160:
3133:
appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at
2972:
2958:
2705:
2691:
1670:
1292:
883:
814:
38:
3368:
2995:
2006:
172:
3416:
3227:
is worth turning on. It allows you to easily add, remove, and change categories on a page, with name suggestions.
3039:
2221:
2162:"Reproductions of objects in the Museum's collections may be licensed for personal, scholarly or commercial uses"
2077:
1574:
1463:
1322:
956:
628:
559:
and participating in some discussions to gain experience and learn policies for a while before applying again. —
1209:
3240:
2054:
1984:
251:
235:
1156:
already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.
678:
338:
2606:
has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
1196:' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.
3261:
2669:
2617:
2344:
2318:
1193:
887:
810:
451:
3183:
3086:
As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically,
2091:
1428:
746:
3164:
2816:
2786:
963:
3179:
3168:
1467:
1397:
378:
3598:
3445:
3326:
2923:
2650:
2203:
2103:
1878:
1311:
1288:
152:
3134:
2570:
906:
890:). I am confident that if you examine the article you will agree that it meets the WP:RS criteria.
3610:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was
3457:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was
2935:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was
2662:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was
3561:
3412:
3407:
3283:
3271:
3072:
3059:
3035:
3030:
2364:
1166:
978:
481:
3209:
3153:
3142:
1401:
1120:
1081:
Oh, doy. It's MORE than three. It's been a long day. I did open a sock investigation just to check.
866:
782:
381:
and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please
3661:
3510:
3213:
2984:
2050:
2045:
1980:
1923:
1908:
1887:
1605:
1527:
1345:
1072:
1039:
651:
477:
394:
386:
47:
17:
3547:
for copy edits totaling between 1 and 3,999 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the
3342:
3224:
1715:
1624:
1431:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
1386:
750:
306:
129:
2875:
2757:
2717:
2613:
2335:
2306:
1872:
1755:
better to draftify them since I rarely see any of the drafts that I've come across get worked on.
701:
521:
If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
447:
220:
160:
137:
3014:
2746:
778:
426:
everted by another editor, the next step, if you continue to think the edit is necessary, is to
326:
group. The closest example is ironically SPLC. The listing of cases in PJI is analogous to this
2939:
2930:
2859:
2812:
2798:
2782:
2682:
in New York City, one of the first to provide low cost psychiatric services to black patients?
2603:
2578:
2555:
2512:
2486:
2467:
2434:
2031:
1944:
1854:
1837:
1822:
1793:
1764:
1700:
1652:
1013:
999:
974:
959:
934:
895:
844:
833:
754:
710:
618:
534:
465:
197:
103:
3163:. Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed
3087:
2186:
1628:
1152:
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly
3618:
3613:
3605:
3470:
3452:
3393:
2761:
2599:
2566:
2402:
2368:
2199:
2115:
2099:
1570:
1562:
1539:
1493:
1439:
1357:
1307:
686:
663:
125:
121:
3354:
And reverting the edit where you were taken to task on your lack of rationale? Bad form...
3175:, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
3149:
2949:, served three years in prison for manslaughter, and was murdered a year after his release?
2546:
2538:
1711:
1578:
1382:
1031:
862:
858:
832:
In regard to helicons: my contributions are incorporated in the Knowledge (XXG) article on
774:
512:
411:
3552:
2765:
2678:
2673:
2657:
2527:
802:
551:
I see you were turned down by Kudpung for the NPR user right, I'd suggest heading over to
201:
3188:
3172:
3010:
2148:), with the exception of non-free material, which is tightly restricted, as explained in
1554:
439:
148:
1462:. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to
476:" user group (probationary 3 months), allowing you to review new pages and mark them as
3657:
3506:
3460:
3355:
3346:
3286:: A fantastic tool for adding WikiProject templates to article talk pages. If you add:
2980:
2894:
2843:. It's a huge improvement to the article. I just want to give you a little feedback:
2802:
2499:
2451:
2385:
2376:
2238:
2135:
1995:
1934:
1919:
1904:
1883:
1865:
1809:
1779:
1729:
1719:
1674:
1632:
1617:
1601:
1082:
1068:
1058:
1051:
1035:
982:
920:
870:
826:
786:
728:
584:
390:
366:
295:
261:
3632:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page
3481:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page
2955:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page
2688:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page
2887:
2871:
2713:
2665:
1597:
857:. This article is at the intersection of several highly scrutinized areas, including
216:
211:
156:
133:
3665:
3570:
3514:
3420:
3358:
3349:
3334:
3313:
3043:
2988:
2897:
2879:
2820:
2805:
2790:
2727:
2625:
2612:
and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
2582:
2559:
2516:
2502:
2490:
2471:
2454:
2438:
2413:
2388:
2379:
2353:
2285:
2241:
2229:
2207:
2138:
2107:
2058:
1998:
1988:
1948:
1927:
1912:
1891:
1858:
1841:
1826:
1812:
1797:
1782:
1768:
1732:
1722:
1704:
1677:
1656:
1635:
1609:
1543:
1520:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing
1497:
1479:
1443:
1361:
1338:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing
1315:
1296:
1239:
1085:
1076:
1061:
1043:
1017:
985:
967:
938:
923:
899:
873:
848:
789:
762:
731:
714:
690:
667:
644:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing
622:
602:
587:
569:
538:
455:
398:
345:
298:
280:
264:
256:
Your talk page is a public space. If you don't want warnings posted on there, don't
243:
224:
164:
141:
107:
3403:
3388:
3026:
2574:
2551:
2508:
2482:
2463:
2446:
2430:
2189:. We cannot add images just because they make an article look nicer: there must be
2041:
1976:
1940:
1898:
1850:
1833:
1818:
1789:
1760:
1696:
1664:
1648:
1593:
1485:
1476:
1009:
930:
912:
directly related to the source there is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity
891:
840:
722:
706:
614:
530:
342:
288:
277:
207:
99:
3639:
3488:
2962:
2695:
1846:
1116:
498:. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the
98:
Thank you for your work on the Weidner Center For The Performing Arts article! --
3118:, which summarizes existing RfCs or RSN discussions about regularly used sources.
2181:
possible that some of the images may qualify for fair-use, provided they satisfy
2098:
is a good place to ask any questions about particular images or sources. Cheers,
2068:
However, I have concerns about some of your claims of Public Domain status, e.g.
1008:
have your sandbox deleted by placing the {{Db-userreq}} template on the page. --
3585:
3432:
3379:
3372:
3006:
2999:
2910:
2772:, for gnomish tasks and for copy-editing as a member of GOCE, - Zed, you are an
2637:
2397:
2299:
1535:
1489:
1435:
1353:
682:
659:
404:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2367:, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on
2156:
also makes several other statements that cast doubt on the free use of images:
2769:
2594:
2537:. I'd just like to note that the hook fact must be sourced in the article per
1631:
me in the future. If I messed something up I will see it in the edit summary.
1577:, then the original title that wasn't specific enough should be turned into a
1177:
to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
854:
770:
183:
176:
3233:
also adds a bunch of very useful links for diagnosing and fixing page issues.
3230:
3528:
2363:
Hi, I'm JJMC89. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed,
977:, you have posted your sandbox link. That cannot be deleted. However, your
3005:
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
3464:
1558:
2258:
2026:
1510:
1381:
Hello, Etzedek24. It has been over six months since you last edited the
1328:
634:
192:
3152:
or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear
1589:
1369:
Draft:List of 100 oldest colleges and universities in the United States
700:
Hey there! I noticed you put a citation-improvement banner on the page
3019:
1115:
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on
2852:
2153:
1280:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Schofield/Rothschild shootings
2462:
Thanks for letting me know you views of the additions to the page.
1434:
Thanks for your submission to Knowledge (XXG), and happy editing.
3171:
userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as
3062:), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.
2498:
As long as you know your own shortcomings, no hard feelings here.
809:
In reference to the “Poisson surprise” test: Cotterill and Eglen (
1391:
List of 100 oldest colleges and universities in the United States
2862:). So anime and katana are common and fine without italics but
3304:
to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
3102:
Knowledge (XXG):New pages patrol/Coordination#Coordinator tasks
3054:
Hello Etzedek24, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
1227:
to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
1142:
Hello Etzedek24, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
886:) is highly respectable, as is the affiliation of the authors (
3116:
Knowledge (XXG):Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources
1128:
Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. (
1104:
377:, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on
25:
3182:
userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally
1509:
1373:
1327:
633:
464:
3239:: Installing scripts doesn't have to be complicated. Go to
3258:(Recommended 20, but you can use any number from 1 to 50).
1557:. It isn't necessary to (further) disambiguate pages like
1267:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to
3551:. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions!
3114:
A new summary page of reliable sources has been created;
494:, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the
3148:
Articles that have been created in contravention of our
2533:
Hi, I just promoted your hook and one of the images to
2313:
Thanks for your informative new article on True Comics.
2275:
Thanks for your recent work patrolling new articles. —
1804:
1585:
1402:
1261:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
1130:
257:
2309:
just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
442:. During the discussion, the article remains in the
3628:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
3477:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
3245:
importScript( 'User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js' );
2951:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
2684:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
1600:. There should only be one blue link per entry etc.
1034:. Regardless hopefully they take your advice. Best,
373:
appears to have added premature information about a
234:
Please stay off my talk page in the future, thanks.
3199:
List of other useful scripts for New Page Reviewing
2953:
Template:Did you know nominations/Bob Wood (comics)
2851:
Knowledge (XXG) uses the logical quotation system (
2294:
A page you started (True Comics) has been reviewed!
914:
the article is not based primarily on such sources.
3630:Template:Did you know nominations/Herron Gymnasium
3479:Template:Did you know nominations/Real Fact Comics
1530:if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
1348:if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
1165:New features are shortly going to be added to the
654:if you have any questions, or you can ask them at
472:Hi Etzedek24. Your account has been added to the "
3626:, was demolished and replaced with a parking lot?
2686:Template:Did you know nominations/Lafargue Clinic
3216:. There are also a lot of options available at
2094:on Wikimedia Commons for more information. The
825:In reference to the brain capacity estimation:
153:Talk:Giovanni Gentile#Gentile = not a socialist
132:to get some feedback about that point. Cheers,
2317:To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's
3549:GOCE September 2018 Backlog Elimination Drive
1470:. If you continue in this manner, you may be
515:not aware that they are doing anything wrong.
8:
2835:Hi Etzedek24! Thanks for your copy edit of
438:to re-revert it, which is the first step to
1567:Knowledge (XXG):Naming conventions (comics)
1306:. But page will need improvement. Cheers!
3278:User:Writ Keeper/Scripts/deletionFinder.js
3194:
2565:I just noticed your discussion above with
2384:Or rather it was marked when I PROD'd it.
2216:Speedy deletion nomination of David Krentz
744:
3602:was updated with a fact from the article
3449:was updated with a fact from the article
3104:for more info to see if you can help out.
2927:was updated with a fact from the article
2654:was updated with a fact from the article
1817:You say that but back it up with nothing.
1269:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
341:then you will probably be topic banned.–
328:Southern_Poverty_Law_Center#Notable_cases
314:Southern_Poverty_Law_Center#Notable_cases
2038:for things which need to be addressed.
204:for things which need to be addressed.
3463:'s earliest known published work was a
3156:might also be draftified at discretion.
2768:, for work on articles for GA, such as
2752:Thank you for quality articles such as
2125:illustrating a school paper or website,
1131:
3049:NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018
2754:Weidner Center for the Performing Arts
2030:. The article is close to meeting the
196:. The article is close to meeting the
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
3252:User:TheJosh/Scripts/NewPagePatrol.js
2081:the date and copyright notice in the
1625:I'm not obliged to memorize policies.
1532:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Non-free content
1350:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Non-free content
656:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Non-free content
7:
3624:National Register of Historic Places
3270:: Creates a "Page Curation" link to
3167:). Note that if you do not have the
3159:The best tool for draftification is
2359:I have unreviewed a page you curated
2088:Copyright rules in the United States
432:iscuss it on the article talk page,
3223:In terms of other gadgets for NPR,
1549:Moving pages per naming conventions
796:Re: "Draft: Charles Rudolf Legéndy"
260:articles. It's really that simple.
2589:DYK nomination of Herron Gymnasium
2074:File:WerthamLafargueConference.png
92:The WikiProject Wisconsin Barnstar
24:
3237:User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js
2268:The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
2036:Talk:Midnighter (2015 comic book)
1278:The article will be discussed at
1096:NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018
3584:
3527:
3459:... that science fiction writer
3431:
3387:
3214:gadgets section of 'preferences'
3018:
2909:
2745:
2636:
2593:
2545:Also, you may want to check out
2257:
2150:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content
2025:
1458:Please stop. Knowledge (XXG) is
1453:
1254:
1108:
504:. In addition, please remember:
360:
191:
82:
29:
2146:Reusing Knowledge (XXG) content
1979:). I'll see what I can dig up.
1712:you have contributed greatly to
955:Is this eligible for deletion?
371:Template:Milwaukee Bucks roster
369:. Your recent edit to the page
3515:00:01, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
3421:08:42, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
3359:03:38, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
3350:03:13, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
3335:03:11, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
3314:23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
3288:rater_autostartNamespaces = 0;
3123:Moving to Draft and Page Mover
3044:15:01, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
2989:00:02, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
2898:19:42, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
2880:20:46, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
2837:Date Masamune (Sengoku Basara)
2821:16:45, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
2806:16:38, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
2791:06:51, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
2728:00:02, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
1975:and a collection of essays by
1264:Schofield/Rothschild shootings
1248:Schofield/Rothschild shootings
951:Is this eligible for deletion?
905:majority of the sources. From
230:How not to use Knowledge (XXG)
1:
3220:after you install the gadget.
3218:the Twinkle preferences panel
3078:WMF's AfC Improvement Project
2626:18:36, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
2604:Did You Know nominations page
2583:20:58, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
2560:20:53, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
2517:16:22, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
2503:15:37, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
2491:12:55, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
165:09:52, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
142:05:52, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
3666:00:01, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
3543:This barnstar is awarded to
3268:User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js
2841:September copy-editing drive
2070:File:LafargueParishHouse.png
2018:Midnighter (2015 comic book)
2011:Midnighter (2015 comic book)
817:(my ref. 13) write, in part:
3571:20:10, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
3400:to appear in Did you know.
2740:Wisconsin basketball comics
2539:WP:DYK#Eligibility criteria
2472:19:09, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
2455:15:18, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
2439:21:58, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
2414:02:16, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
2389:02:49, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
2380:02:46, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
2354:18:43, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
2286:21:13, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
2242:00:16, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
2230:23:18, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
2208:03:58, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
2139:02:53, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
2108:02:36, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
2059:02:03, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
1999:19:44, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
1989:19:39, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
1949:10:39, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
1928:04:34, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
1913:03:58, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
1892:03:57, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
1636:05:15, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
1610:04:22, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
1544:17:10, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
1505:File:WerthamGordonParks.png
1498:01:52, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
501:new page reviewer talk page
375:reported sports transaction
337:Because if you are here to
108:00:48, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
3681:
3520:September 2018 drive bling
3306:MediaWiki message delivery
3274:up near your sandbox link.
3161:User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js
2943:, co-creator of the comic
2831:Copy edit of Date Masamune
2598:Hello! Your submission of
1788:claims combat my concerns.
1480:10:40, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
1444:14:54, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
1362:17:18, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
884:Journal of Neurophysiology
815:Journal of Neurophysiology
346:10:40, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
299:16:13, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
281:09:21, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
265:16:12, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
244:09:18, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
225:06:00, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
120:Just a heads-up about the
3644:, and it may be added to
3533:
3526:
3493:, and it may be added to
3150:paid-editing-requirements
3013:-status according to the
2967:, and it may be added to
2904:DYK for Bob Wood (comics)
2700:, and it may be added to
2263:
2256:
2187:non-free content criteria
2173:Under The Strain of Color
2078:File:LafarguePlayroom.png
1859:19:21, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
1842:11:02, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
1827:11:00, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
1813:02:14, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
1798:02:09, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
1783:02:05, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
1769:01:47, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
1733:01:03, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
1723:00:57, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
1705:00:44, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
1678:00:33, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
1657:00:28, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
1575:The American Way (comics)
1464:Pacific Justice Institute
1323:File:ECStoner Gordons.jpg
1316:04:54, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
1297:05:07, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
1240:00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
1160:New technology, new rules
1086:00:14, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
1077:00:12, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
1062:00:06, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
1044:00:04, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
1018:11:50, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
957:User:Strawberrian/sandbox
939:00:42, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
924:22:17, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
900:19:33, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
874:21:58, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
849:17:04, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
790:18:16, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
763:18:03, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
732:14:13, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
715:13:53, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
691:06:04, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
668:17:12, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
629:File:DeadpoolvGambit1.jpg
490:read the new tutorial at
461:New page reviewer granted
456:16:35, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
271:Pacific Justice Institute
88:
81:
3579:DYK for Herron Gymnasium
3426:DYK for Real Fact Comics
2024:has been placed on hold
1994:Appreciate it, Argento!
1271:or whether it should be
986:16:31, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
968:15:56, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
813:), in a recent paper in
623:01:50, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
603:01:56, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
588:01:50, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
570:22:06, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
553:WP:Articles for deletion
539:01:47, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
399:17:43, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
324:Christian legal advocacy
190:has been placed on hold
3262:User:Primefac/revdel.js
2631:DYK for Lafargue Clinic
2609:your nomination's entry
2305:Knowledge (XXG) editor
888:University of Cambridge
3650:Did you know talk page
3499:Did you know talk page
2973:Did you know talk page
2706:Did you know talk page
2315:
2280:Insertcleverphrasehere
2096:Copyright Village Pump
1514:
1466:, will be regarded as
1378:
1332:
1234:Insertcleverphrasehere
638:
611:Insertcleverphrasehere
597:Insertcleverphrasehere
578:Insertcleverphrasehere
564:Insertcleverphrasehere
509:Be nice to new editors
469:
383:cite a reliable source
3402:Message delivered by
3321:stay off my talk page
3025:Message delivered by
2676:helped establish the
2311:
2040:Message delivered by
2032:good article criteria
1879:Love Is Love (comics)
1513:
1383:Articles for Creation
1377:
1331:
637:
468:
206:Message delivered by
198:good article criteria
42:of past discussions.
3284:User:Evad37/rater.js
3272:Special:NewPagesFeed
3143:conflict of interest
3060:Special:NewPagesFeed
2298:Thanks for creating
2222:Ferahgo the Assassin
1367:Your draft article,
1210:the monthly magazine
1167:Special:NewPagesFeed
811:Cambridge University
769:You want to talk to
252:Magnacartalibertatum
236:Magnacartalibertatum
147:I responded to your
3646:the statistics page
3495:the statistics page
3382:you nominated as a
2969:the statistics page
2866:should get italics.
2702:the statistics page
2419:Rachel Zoll article
2250:A Barnstar for you!
2020:you nominated as a
1579:disambiguation page
1524:WP:Image resolution
1403:edit the submission
1389:page you started, "
1342:WP:Image resolution
679:Etzedek24/Archive 1
648:WP:Image resolution
335:WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS
186:you nominated as a
18:User talk:Etzedek24
3537:The Minor Barnstar
3467:to the comic book
3325:you are annoying.
3009:you nominated for
2946:Crime Does Not Pay
2774:awesome Wikipedian
2758:Philadelphia Sphas
2664:... that in 1948,
2191:no free equivalent
1515:
1379:
1333:
1208:The next issue of
1146:June backlog drive
702:Medusa (DC Comics)
696:Medusa (DC Comics)
673:A Boy from Tandale
639:
557:WP:Requested moves
474:New page reviewers
470:
420:old edit has been
3643:
3576:
3575:
3492:
3441:20 September 2018
3410:
3316:
3297:
3296:
3256:npp_num_pages=20;
3033:
2966:
2963:Bob Wood (comics)
2931:Bob Wood (comics)
2919:17 September 2018
2860:MOS:FOREIGNITALIC
2699:
2646:12 September 2018
2423:Hello Etzedek24:
2412:
2339:
2330:
2325:Learn more about
2291:
2290:
2282:
2048:
1236:
1228:
1140:
1139:
1127:
1126:
993:talk page stalker
801:declination, but
765:
749:comment added by
599:
566:
379:anonymous sources
214:
113:
112:
72:
71:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
3672:
3640:Herron Gymnasium
3633:
3622:, listed on the
3619:Herron Gymnasium
3614:Miami University
3606:Herron Gymnasium
3588:
3566:
3557:
3531:
3524:
3523:
3489:Real Fact Comics
3482:
3471:Real Fact Comics
3453:Real Fact Comics
3435:
3401:
3394:Talk:E.C. Stoner
3391:
3327:John from Idegon
3299:
3289:
3257:
3246:
3195:
3024:
3022:
2956:
2913:
2891:
2762:Real Fact Comics
2749:
2689:
2640:
2600:Herron Gymnasium
2597:
2400:
2352:
2337:
2324:
2278:
2261:
2254:
2253:
2119:
2039:
2029:
1938:
1903:fixing my ping.
1902:
1876:
1869:
1668:
1621:
1584:Also, regarding
1571:The American Way
1563:Inhuman (comics)
1457:
1456:
1423:
1422:
1417:
1416:
1411:
1410:
1405:
1376:
1289:John from Idegon
1258:
1257:
1232:
1222:
1135:
1133:
1112:
1111:
1105:
1101:
1100:
1055:
1003:
996:
726:
595:
581:
562:
492:New Pages Review
475:
389:. Thank you. –
364:
363:
292:
255:
205:
195:
126:Giovanni Gentile
116:Giovanni Gentile
86:
79:
78:
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
3680:
3679:
3675:
3674:
3673:
3671:
3670:
3669:
3655:
3654:
3594:12 October 2018
3589:
3581:
3564:
3555:
3522:
3504:
3503:
3436:
3428:
3413:Fish and karate
3408:Fish and karate
3406:, on behalf of
3376:
3323:
3318:
3293:
3287:
3255:
3244:
3200:
3189:Requested Moves
3051:
3036:Fish and karate
3031:Fish and karate
3029:, on behalf of
3003:
2978:
2977:
2914:
2906:
2885:
2833:
2779:
2778:
2766:Lafargue Clinic
2750:
2735:
2711:
2710:
2696:Lafargue Clinic
2679:Lafargue Clinic
2674:Fredric Wertham
2658:Lafargue Clinic
2641:
2633:
2591:
2531:
2528:Lafargue Clinic
2479:
2421:
2365:Pratibha sharma
2361:
2334:
2296:
2252:
2218:
2193:, they must be
2113:
2066:
2044:, on behalf of
2014:
1969:
1967:Lafargue Clinic
1932:
1896:
1870:
1863:
1662:
1644:
1629:policy linkspam
1615:
1592:, particularly
1551:
1508:
1454:
1451:
1420:
1419:
1414:
1413:
1408:
1407:
1406:and remove the
1374:
1372:
1326:
1259:
1255:
1252:
1243:
1129:
1109:
1098:
1049:
1028:
997:
990:
979:Susumu Matsuura
953:
822:
798:
740:
720:
698:
675:
632:
615:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง
575:
546:
531:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง
496:deletion policy
473:
463:
444:status quo ante
408:
361:
358:
286:
273:
249:
232:
210:, on behalf of
202:Talk:Jack Kirby
180:
149:reliable source
124:you started at
118:
77:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
3678:
3676:
3590:
3583:
3582:
3580:
3577:
3574:
3573:
3540:
3539:
3534:
3532:
3521:
3518:
3461:Harlan Ellison
3437:
3430:
3429:
3427:
3424:
3375:
3371:nomination of
3365:
3364:
3363:
3362:
3361:
3322:
3319:
3295:
3294:
3292:
3291:
3281:
3275:
3265:
3259:
3249:
3241:your common.js
3234:
3228:
3221:
3206:
3205:
3202:
3201:
3198:
3193:
3192:
3176:
3157:
3146:
3138:
3125:
3124:
3120:
3119:
3111:
3110:
3106:
3105:
3097:
3096:
3095:for more info.
3083:
3082:
3068:
3067:
3052:
3050:
3047:
3002:
2998:nomination of
2992:
2915:
2908:
2907:
2905:
2902:
2901:
2900:
2868:
2867:
2856:
2849:
2832:
2829:
2828:
2827:
2826:
2825:
2824:
2823:
2744:
2742:
2737:
2736:
2734:
2731:
2670:Richard Wright
2642:
2635:
2634:
2632:
2629:
2590:
2587:
2586:
2585:
2530:
2525:
2524:
2523:
2522:
2521:
2520:
2519:
2478:
2475:
2460:
2459:
2458:
2457:
2420:
2417:
2394:
2393:
2392:
2391:
2360:
2357:
2295:
2292:
2289:
2288:
2272:
2271:
2264:
2262:
2251:
2248:
2247:
2246:
2245:
2244:
2217:
2214:
2213:
2212:
2211:
2210:
2200:--Animalparty!
2168:
2167:
2166:
2163:
2160:
2131:
2130:
2129:
2100:--Animalparty!
2065:
2062:
2051:Fearstreetsaga
2046:Fearstreetsaga
2013:
2009:nomination of
2003:
2002:
2001:
1981:Argento Surfer
1968:
1965:
1964:
1963:
1962:
1961:
1960:
1959:
1958:
1957:
1956:
1955:
1954:
1953:
1952:
1951:
1915:
1894:
1844:
1829:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1772:
1771:
1756:
1752:
1743:
1739:
1725:
1643:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1588:, please read
1550:
1547:
1507:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1450:
1447:
1385:submission or
1371:
1365:
1325:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1253:
1251:
1246:Nomination of
1244:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1205:
1204:
1198:
1197:
1188:
1187:
1183:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1162:
1161:
1151:
1148:
1147:
1138:
1137:
1125:
1124:
1113:
1099:
1097:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1027:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1004:Followup: you
952:
949:
948:
947:
946:
945:
944:
943:
942:
941:
838:
837:
830:
820:
819:
818:
797:
794:
793:
792:
739:
736:
735:
734:
697:
694:
674:
671:
631:
626:
608:
607:
606:
605:
548:Hi Etzedek24,
545:
542:
526:
525:
522:
519:
516:
483:New Pages Feed
462:
459:
410:Please review
407:
402:
357:
354:
353:
352:
351:
350:
349:
348:
339:WP:NOTADVOCATE
331:
320:
317:
310:
272:
269:
268:
267:
231:
228:
179:
175:nomination of
169:
168:
167:
117:
114:
111:
110:
95:
94:
89:
87:
76:
73:
70:
69:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3677:
3668:
3667:
3663:
3659:
3653:
3651:
3647:
3641:
3637:
3631:
3627:
3625:
3621:
3620:
3615:
3609:
3608:
3607:
3601:
3600:
3595:
3587:
3578:
3572:
3569:
3568:
3567:
3560:
3559:
3558:
3550:
3546:
3542:
3541:
3538:
3535:
3530:
3525:
3519:
3517:
3516:
3512:
3508:
3502:
3500:
3496:
3490:
3486:
3480:
3476:
3473:
3472:
3468:
3466:
3462:
3456:
3455:
3454:
3448:
3447:
3442:
3434:
3425:
3423:
3422:
3418:
3414:
3409:
3405:
3399:
3395:
3390:
3385:
3381:
3374:
3370:
3366:
3360:
3357:
3353:
3352:
3351:
3348:
3344:
3339:
3338:
3337:
3336:
3332:
3328:
3320:
3317:
3315:
3311:
3307:
3303:
3285:
3282:
3279:
3276:
3273:
3269:
3266:
3263:
3260:
3253:
3250:
3242:
3238:
3235:
3232:
3229:
3226:
3222:
3219:
3215:
3211:
3208:
3207:
3204:
3203:
3197:
3196:
3190:
3185:
3184:page swapping
3181:
3177:
3174:
3170:
3166:
3162:
3158:
3155:
3151:
3147:
3144:
3139:
3136:
3131:
3127:
3126:
3122:
3121:
3117:
3113:
3112:
3108:
3107:
3103:
3099:
3098:
3094:
3089:
3085:
3084:
3080:
3079:
3074:
3073:New Page Feed
3070:
3069:
3065:
3064:
3063:
3061:
3055:
3048:
3046:
3045:
3041:
3037:
3032:
3028:
3021:
3016:
3012:
3008:
3001:
2997:
2993:
2991:
2990:
2986:
2982:
2976:
2974:
2970:
2964:
2960:
2954:
2950:
2947:
2944:
2942:
2941:
2934:
2933:
2932:
2926:
2925:
2920:
2912:
2903:
2899:
2896:
2889:
2884:
2883:
2882:
2881:
2877:
2873:
2865:
2861:
2857:
2854:
2850:
2846:
2845:
2844:
2842:
2838:
2830:
2822:
2818:
2814:
2809:
2808:
2807:
2804:
2800:
2797:
2796:
2795:
2794:
2793:
2792:
2788:
2784:
2777:
2775:
2771:
2767:
2763:
2759:
2755:
2748:
2743:
2741:
2732:
2730:
2729:
2725:
2722:
2719:
2715:
2709:
2707:
2703:
2697:
2693:
2687:
2683:
2681:
2680:
2675:
2671:
2667:
2666:Ralph Ellison
2661:
2660:
2659:
2653:
2652:
2647:
2639:
2630:
2628:
2627:
2623:
2622:contributions
2619:
2615:
2614:Jo-Jo Eumerus
2611:
2610:
2605:
2601:
2596:
2588:
2584:
2580:
2576:
2572:
2568:
2564:
2563:
2562:
2561:
2557:
2553:
2548:
2543:
2540:
2536:
2529:
2526:
2518:
2514:
2510:
2506:
2505:
2504:
2501:
2497:
2496:
2495:
2494:
2493:
2492:
2488:
2484:
2476:
2474:
2473:
2469:
2465:
2456:
2453:
2448:
2445:
2444:
2443:
2442:
2441:
2440:
2436:
2432:
2428:
2424:
2418:
2416:
2415:
2410:
2407:
2404:
2399:
2390:
2387:
2383:
2382:
2381:
2378:
2374:
2373:
2372:
2371:. Thank you.
2370:
2366:
2358:
2356:
2355:
2350:
2346:
2342:
2341:
2331:
2328:
2327:page curation
2322:
2320:
2314:
2310:
2308:
2307:Doomsdayer520
2303:
2302:, Etzedek24!
2301:
2293:
2287:
2284:
2283:
2281:
2274:
2273:
2270:
2269:
2265:
2260:
2255:
2249:
2243:
2240:
2236:
2235:
2234:
2233:
2232:
2231:
2227:
2223:
2215:
2209:
2205:
2201:
2196:
2192:
2188:
2184:
2179:
2174:
2169:
2164:
2161:
2158:
2157:
2155:
2151:
2147:
2142:
2141:
2140:
2137:
2132:
2126:
2122:
2121:
2117:
2112:
2111:
2110:
2109:
2105:
2101:
2097:
2093:
2089:
2084:
2079:
2075:
2071:
2064:Public Domain
2063:
2061:
2060:
2056:
2052:
2047:
2043:
2037:
2033:
2028:
2023:
2019:
2012:
2008:
2004:
2000:
1997:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1990:
1986:
1982:
1978:
1974:
1966:
1950:
1946:
1942:
1936:
1931:
1930:
1929:
1925:
1921:
1916:
1914:
1910:
1906:
1900:
1895:
1893:
1889:
1885:
1880:
1874:
1867:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1856:
1852:
1848:
1845:
1843:
1839:
1835:
1830:
1828:
1824:
1820:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1811:
1806:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1795:
1791:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1781:
1776:
1770:
1766:
1762:
1757:
1753:
1749:
1744:
1740:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1731:
1726:
1724:
1721:
1717:
1713:
1708:
1707:
1706:
1702:
1698:
1693:
1692:Jessica Jones
1689:
1685:
1681:
1680:
1679:
1676:
1672:
1666:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1654:
1650:
1641:
1637:
1634:
1630:
1627:Please don't
1626:
1619:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1607:
1603:
1599:
1598:MOS:DABPIPING
1595:
1591:
1587:
1582:
1580:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1564:
1560:
1556:
1548:
1546:
1545:
1541:
1537:
1533:
1529:
1525:
1521:
1512:
1506:
1503:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1487:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1478:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1448:
1446:
1445:
1441:
1437:
1432:
1430:
1425:
1404:
1399:
1394:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1370:
1366:
1364:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1330:
1324:
1321:
1317:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1284:
1281:
1276:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1265:
1249:
1245:
1242:
1241:
1238:
1237:
1235:
1226:
1216:
1211:
1207:
1206:
1203:
1200:
1199:
1195:
1194:move to draft
1190:
1189:
1185:
1184:
1179:
1175:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1163:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1155:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1134:
1122:
1121:MediaWiki.org
1118:
1114:
1107:
1106:
1103:
1102:
1095:
1087:
1084:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1060:
1053:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1025:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1001:
994:
989:
988:
987:
984:
980:
976:
972:
971:
970:
969:
965:
961:
958:
950:
940:
936:
932:
927:
926:
925:
922:
917:
915:
908:
903:
902:
901:
897:
893:
889:
885:
880:
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
872:
868:
864:
860:
856:
851:
850:
846:
842:
835:
831:
828:
824:
823:
816:
812:
808:
807:
806:
804:
795:
791:
788:
784:
780:
776:
772:
768:
767:
766:
764:
760:
756:
752:
748:
737:
733:
730:
724:
719:
718:
717:
716:
712:
708:
703:
695:
693:
692:
688:
684:
680:
672:
670:
669:
665:
661:
657:
653:
649:
645:
636:
630:
627:
625:
624:
620:
616:
613:, see below.
612:
604:
601:
600:
598:
591:
590:
589:
586:
579:
574:
573:
572:
571:
568:
567:
565:
558:
554:
549:
543:
541:
540:
536:
532:
523:
520:
517:
514:
510:
507:
506:
505:
503:
502:
497:
493:
489:
485:
484:
479:
467:
460:
458:
457:
453:
449:
448:Beyond My Ken
445:
441:
437:
436:
431:
430:
425:
424:
419:
418:
414:. When your
413:
406:
403:
401:
400:
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
355:
347:
344:
340:
336:
332:
329:
325:
321:
318:
315:
311:
308:
304:
303:
302:
301:
300:
297:
290:
285:
284:
283:
282:
279:
270:
266:
263:
259:
253:
248:
247:
246:
245:
241:
237:
229:
227:
226:
222:
218:
213:
209:
203:
199:
194:
189:
185:
178:
174:
170:
166:
162:
158:
155:. Cordially,
154:
150:
146:
145:
144:
143:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
115:
109:
105:
101:
97:
96:
93:
90:
85:
80:
74:
68:
65:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
3656:
3617:
3611:
3604:
3603:
3599:Did you know
3597:
3591:
3563:
3562:
3554:
3553:
3544:
3536:
3505:
3474:
3469:
3458:
3451:
3450:
3446:Did you know
3444:
3438:
3384:good article
3378:The article
3377:
3324:
3298:
3129:
3076:
3066:Project news
3056:
3053:
3004:
2979:
2948:
2938:
2936:
2929:
2928:
2924:Did you know
2922:
2916:
2869:
2863:
2834:
2813:Gerda Arendt
2783:Gerda Arendt
2780:
2751:
2739:
2738:
2720:
2712:
2677:
2663:
2656:
2655:
2651:Did you know
2649:
2643:
2607:
2592:
2544:
2532:
2480:
2461:
2429:
2425:
2422:
2405:
2395:
2369:my talk page
2362:
2336:
2332:
2323:
2316:
2312:
2304:
2297:
2277:
2276:
2267:
2266:
2219:
2194:
2190:
2182:
2177:
2172:
2144:commercial (
2124:
2092:Hirtle Chart
2082:
2067:
2022:good article
2016:The article
2015:
1977:Mark Evanier
1972:
1970:
1747:
1691:
1687:
1683:
1671:this article
1645:
1594:MOS:DABENTRY
1583:
1553:Please read
1552:
1516:
1460:not censored
1452:
1433:
1426:
1415:{{db-draft}}
1395:
1380:
1334:
1303:
1285:
1277:
1262:
1260:
1250:for deletion
1231:
1230:
1221:
1202:The Signpost
1201:
1153:
1149:
1141:
1029:
1005:
1000:Strawberrian
975:Strawberrian
960:Strawberrian
954:
913:
910:
852:
839:
799:
745:— Preceding
741:
699:
676:
640:
609:
594:
593:
561:
560:
555:and over to
550:
547:
527:
500:
487:
482:
471:
443:
440:edit warring
434:
433:
428:
427:
422:
421:
416:
415:
409:
387:my talk page
359:
323:
274:
233:
188:good article
182:The article
181:
119:
91:
60:
43:
37:
3398:nominate it
3386:has passed
3380:E.C. Stoner
3373:E.C. Stoner
3135:WP:DRAFTIFY
3007:E.C. Stoner
3000:E.C. Stoner
2567:Animalparty
2507:Thanks man.
2300:True Comics
2154:rights page
2152:. The MCNY
2116:Animalparty
1877:I've moved
1308:E.M.Gregory
1117:Phabricator
1026:Bwflannigan
907:WP:YOURSELF
827:Donald Hebb
738:FoldingCoin
511:. They are
405:Strasserism
365:Hello, I'm
36:This is an
3636:here's how
3485:here's how
3465:fan letter
3180:Page Mover
3169:Page Mover
2959:here's how
2770:Jack Kirby
2692:here's how
2338:DOOMSDAYER
2178:originally
1939:Thank you.
1449:April 2018
1421:{{db-g13}}
1409:{{db-afc}}
1186:Editathons
585:Etzedek24
296:Etzedek24
262:Etzedek24
184:Jack Kirby
177:Jack Kirby
151:issue at
3658:Alex Shih
3612:... that
3545:Etzedek24
3507:Alex Shih
3356:Etzedek24
3347:Etzedek24
3243:and copy
3165:like this
3093:talk page
2981:Alex Shih
2937:... that
2895:Etzedek24
2848:surname).
2803:Etzedek24
2714:Cas Liber
2500:Etzedek24
2477:About us.
2452:Etzedek24
2386:Etzedek24
2377:Etzedek24
2319:talk page
2239:Etzedek24
2195:essential
2136:Etzedek24
1996:Etzedek24
1973:Alter Ego
1935:Bennv3771
1920:Bennv3771
1905:Bennv3771
1884:Bennv3771
1866:Etzedek24
1847:Like this
1810:Etzedek24
1805:the table
1780:Etzedek24
1730:Etzedek24
1720:Etzedek24
1716:WP:COMICS
1675:Etzedek24
1647:yourself.
1633:Etzedek24
1618:Bennv3771
1602:Bennv3771
1586:this edit
1528:bot owner
1468:vandalism
1429:this link
1398:mainspace
1346:bot owner
1181:reviewer.
1171:this page
1083:Etzedek24
1069:Barkeep49
1059:Etzedek24
1052:Barkeep49
1036:Barkeep49
983:Etzedek24
921:Etzedek24
871:Etzedek24
787:Etzedek24
729:Etzedek24
652:bot owner
478:patrolled
391:Sabbatino
367:Sabbatino
307:WP:VERIFY
258:vandalize
130:WP:AN/RFC
67:Archive 2
61:Archive 1
3345:, John.
3231:MoreMenu
3015:criteria
2940:Bob Wood
2888:Reidgreg
2872:Reidgreg
2864:jinbaori
2839:for the
2733:Precious
2724:contribs
2509:★Trekker
2483:★Trekker
2349:Contribs
2128:portal."
2090:and the
2083:original
1941:★Trekker
1851:★Trekker
1834:★Trekker
1819:★Trekker
1790:★Trekker
1761:★Trekker
1697:★Trekker
1649:★Trekker
1559:Wikirank
834:helicons
759:contribs
747:unsigned
356:May 2018
217:Hawkeye7
212:Hawkeye7
157:Mathglot
134:Mathglot
75:Barnstar
3404:Legobot
3210:Twinkle
3027:Legobot
2602:at the
2575:Yoninah
2552:Yoninah
2464:Heron10
2447:Heron10
2431:Heron10
2185:of the
2042:Legobot
1899:*Treker
1832:myself.
1688:article
1684:notable
1665:*Treker
1590:MOS:DAB
1472:blocked
1424:code.
1273:deleted
1119:and on
1010:Dolotta
931:OAKS222
892:OAKS222
867:not now
841:OAKS222
751:Pooktwo
723:Nyssane
544:NPR/AfC
513:usually
289:Lionelt
208:Legobot
100:Dolotta
39:archive
3565:apolis
3392:; see
3343:rancor
3225:HotCat
3173:CSD R2
2853:MOS:LQ
2672:, and
2571:WT:DYK
2547:WP:SRF
2535:Prep 4
2398:JJMC89
2076:, and
1873:Treker
1642:Drafts
1536:RonBot
1490:Drmies
1486:Lionel
1477:Lionel
1436:Hhkohh
1354:RonBot
1032:WP:3RR
863:WP:BLP
859:WP:COI
781:, and
707:Nyssie
683:Muddyb
677:Hello
660:RonBot
412:WP:BRD
343:Lionel
278:Lionel
3367:Your
3248:page)
3130:might
3109:Other
2994:Your
2799:Gerda
2005:Your
1748:hopes
1738:that.
1555:WP:NC
1418:, or
1387:Draft
1213:team
1154:1,400
1132:Purge
855:Bradv
803:Bradv
771:Bbb23
171:Your
16:<
3662:talk
3556:Mini
3511:talk
3417:talk
3331:talk
3310:talk
3302:here
3178:The
3088:ORES
3071:The
3040:talk
2985:talk
2876:talk
2817:talk
2787:talk
2764:and
2718:talk
2618:talk
2579:talk
2556:talk
2513:talk
2487:talk
2468:talk
2435:talk
2345:Talk
2226:talk
2204:talk
2104:talk
2055:talk
1985:talk
1945:talk
1924:talk
1909:talk
1888:talk
1855:talk
1838:talk
1823:talk
1803:see
1794:talk
1765:talk
1701:talk
1653:talk
1606:talk
1596:and
1540:talk
1494:talk
1440:talk
1393:".
1358:talk
1312:talk
1304:keep
1293:talk
1225:here
1215:here
1073:talk
1040:talk
1014:talk
964:talk
935:talk
896:talk
861:and
845:talk
783:here
779:here
775:here
755:talk
711:talk
687:talk
664:talk
619:talk
535:talk
488:must
452:talk
395:talk
240:talk
221:talk
161:talk
138:talk
104:talk
3616:'s
3592:On
3439:On
3411:--
3300:Go
3154:COI
3034:--
2917:On
2644:On
2340:520
2333:---
2183:all
2049:--
1573:to
1561:or
1223:Go
1006:may
973:Hi
909:: "
435:not
215:--
122:Rfc
3664:)
3652:.
3638:,
3596:,
3513:)
3501:.
3487:,
3443:,
3419:)
3369:GA
3333:)
3312:)
3042:)
3017:.
3011:GA
2996:GA
2987:)
2975:.
2961:,
2921:,
2878:)
2819:)
2811:--
2789:)
2781:--
2776:!
2760:,
2756:,
2726:)
2708:.
2694:,
2668:,
2648:,
2624:)
2620:,
2581:)
2573:.
2558:)
2515:)
2489:)
2470:)
2437:)
2396:—
2321:.
2228:)
2206:)
2106:)
2072:,
2057:)
2007:GA
1987:)
1947:)
1926:)
1911:)
1890:)
1857:)
1840:)
1825:)
1796:)
1767:)
1703:)
1655:)
1608:)
1542:)
1534:.
1496:)
1442:)
1412:,
1360:)
1352:.
1314:)
1295:)
1275:.
1229:—
1136:)
1075:)
1042:)
1016:)
966:)
937:)
898:)
869:.
847:)
777:,
761:)
757:•
713:)
689:)
666:)
658:.
621:)
537:)
454:)
446:.
397:)
242:)
223:)
173:GA
163:)
140:)
106:)
3660:(
3642:)
3634:(
3509:(
3491:)
3483:(
3475:?
3415:(
3329:(
3308:(
3145:.
3137:.
3081:.
3038:(
2983:(
2965:)
2957:(
2890::
2886:@
2874:(
2815:(
2785:(
2721:·
2716:(
2698:)
2690:(
2616:(
2577:(
2554:(
2511:(
2485:(
2466:(
2433:(
2411:)
2409:C
2406:·
2403:T
2401:(
2351:)
2347:|
2343:(
2329:.
2224:(
2202:(
2118::
2114:@
2102:(
2053:(
1983:(
1943:(
1937::
1933:@
1922:(
1907:(
1901::
1897:@
1886:(
1875::
1871:@
1868::
1864:@
1853:(
1836:(
1821:(
1792:(
1763:(
1699:(
1667::
1663:@
1651:(
1620::
1616:@
1604:(
1538:(
1492:(
1438:(
1356:(
1310:(
1291:(
1217:.
1192:'
1173:.
1123:.
1071:(
1054::
1050:@
1038:(
1012:(
1002::
998:@
995:)
991:(
962:(
933:(
916:"
894:(
882:(
843:(
836:.
753:(
725::
721:@
709:(
685:(
662:(
617:(
580::
576:@
533:(
450:(
429:D
423:R
417:B
393:(
330:.
316:.
309:.
291::
287:@
254::
250:@
238:(
219:(
159:(
136:(
102:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.