Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:EurekaLott/Archive09

Source đź“ť

1513:. He does have a userbox that suggests he's probably a minor, not that that means anything in itself re competence. Anyway, I am concerned about his reversion of my reversion (which I took the trouble to explain both on the article's talk page and his talk page) for nonsensical reasons and with a bogus edit summary and also about his failure to communicate (including blanking my two perfectly civil messages from his talk page). A quick glance through his contributions shows he's been slapping maintenance on articles all over the place—almost randomly, as far as I can tell—and changing the date on tags other editors have placed. I foresee a block if this continues, but is there any chance you could try to have a quiet word with him in the meantime? I did see one or two nominally constructive edits he'd made, so he may be redeemable. 208:; ) the other content is more for giving me an idea of formatting and a place to hold some rough notes, bits of information and ideas. Basically, am I going off on a tangent, and the content is not suitable for a wiki article. If so that’s fine, and I’ll start playing Solitaire as I’m getting sick of Tetris. If the general idea is sound then I have no problems in spending a bit more time attempting to put more content together, with the hope that more experienced editors will then duly rip it apart in order to bring it up to Knowledge (XXG) standards, and perhaps add further information, before even considering the remote possibility of replacing the existing article. Basically I’m not so arrogant as to attempt this alone. ; ) 333:, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Knowledge (XXG) administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community 31: 62: 186:
costume, music, special effects etc. But did include a fascinating piece on what accents the actors used. ; ) I also noticed that at one point it was proposed as a possible featured article!? I spend quite a bit of time on the computer due to work, but there’s also periods when I’m sitting playing Tetris waiting for print jobs to finish. So a while back I started looking at essentially rewriting the article from the bottom up.
997:, but I wanted to mention that I chose the bare citation code for the PD special section over the "cite news" template in order to de-emphasize the date of the page because I wanted to draw attention to the various articles listed there, which of course have different dates, rather than to the page itself. Therefore I made the form of the link look more like a general external link than a news one. Not cool per MOS? 721:, suddenly the wikilink to Depend undergarments disappeared and subsequently, so did my edit. I tried to "anchor" the statement with a relevant and verifiable reference source that the actress was the first celebrity to undertake promotion for an undergarment ... and then came the reverts. Can you check it now to see that things work out. At present, we now have two articles that are exactly the same: 475: 432: 514:, but since he's stopped editing for some hours, I don't expect there to be cause for an immediate block; we'll have to wait for tomorrow for him to get his third block in two months. What's more, he's also disrupting other languages; I had to leave a note for Bosnian admins, and I've found confusing bits such as 1235:
I noticed that you moved this article. I agree that we don't need two copies, but it was initially moved by a rogue user without a registered name. Because the rivalry encompasses more than just basketball, it shouldn't be specific to basketball. It's the other basketball page that needs to be moved,
880:
Hello! I see that you declined speedy deletion on the above article to preserve the article's history. Is there any way to delete this redirect page, which is not only an unlikely search term but is misspelled? (It should be Legionnaires, not Legionnaries) If nothing else, can we move the redirect to
211:
BTW. I realise interest in the B5 article is low, for various reasons. I’ve approached yourself (and two others) as I noticed you’ve edited the thing a number of times over the last year or so, and appear to know what the hell your doing. ; ) But if I’m barking up the wrong barge poll, please let
1170:
There's no mess. Only you oppose this name and page move. Sources confirm that the title will be "Into Darkness". Why go through all this drama? If all you are waiting for is Paramount to come out and say so, hold your breath, its just a matter of time. Otherwise sources are now calling this film by
487:
Eureka, is there some way to remove that 80's king band as to not have them affiliated with one another? The hatnote is so annoying.... or could you at least rename the 80's king band to something else? like king group...or king rock band... don't care as long as its not king band.. HELP!:) It's not
185:
Hi, I was hoping you could provide some advice on something that I’m toying with. Quite a while ago I was looking at the Babylon 5 article and noticed it was rather long while, a little surprisingly, at the same time didn’t really include any information on various production elements such as the
1448:
If you're gonna undo completely reasonable and useful improvements, you're gonna have to come up with a rationale that (a) trumps reasonableness and usefulness, and (b) is itself fully explained. Your "contribution" ticked neither of those boxes; it just cast a slur on an excellent edit. One can
1255:
on September 16. We should have only one copy of the article, and that's the one that has its full article history attached. Because there's clearly disagreement about the page title, I moved it back and started a requested move discussion. In the future, if another user performs a page move with
444:
I'm trying to edit the KING (band) page and get it to pop up as the first thing you see in Knowledge (XXG) when you type in king band without caps lock. Any idea how to do that? Thing is KING (band) is about to release a rap pop album and it's going to be a pretty big thing here in the UK so I'm
407:
was, at some point, moved or merged with Greater Cleveland, and given that it may be necessary to establish the distinction between the two with separate Knowledge (XXG) articles, I was wondering how we can free-up the name 'Northeast Ohio' from it's current status as a re-direct so that it can
337:, were it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students. 1012:
I don't think it's a big deal either way, however, with the exception of the recent article at the top of the page, every other linked article was posted in early May. Do you think it would make sense to add a link to the paper's ongoing coverage (perhaps
910:
and prevents it from appearing in the search box. There was an article in place there for about seven months, so we should probably retain the redirect. If you think it would be helpful, you could create a second redirect at the correct spelling. -
1271:
This article definitely meets the guide lines for speedy deletion. It's an uninformative stub of a non notable song with no citations! I know you probably love Yes, but so do I. Also don't want their non notable and poorly wirrten articles to stay
357:
The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and
1332:
Thank you for calling my attention to the guidance on citing one's own work. I have a new book out, which adds new ideas and information to my field. I will limited cites to very specific issues in "the marketplace of ideas."
1308:
as an alternative use -or variety- in some countries) to the Spanish word in the article; thus we will be able to see -other than having the article more tidy- what the primary universal source for Spanish lexicon says
1295:
article. The references to the RAE Dictionary at the article are all dead ends. I tried to correct them without any success. I kindly request you to correct all the three references (they are all in the Dictionary;
212:
me know. If you know of anyone else who may be interested in passing an eye over what is being put together, or who may have access to printed reference material, that would be most appreciated as well. Cheers.
958:. Because the redirects at the misspelling and in the Knowledge (XXG) namespace are a recent creations, I think they should be safe to delete. I'll move the merged article back to its original location. - 1505:'s edits at that article. EurekaLott, I see you have the mop, so I hope you'll forgive me for leaving a quick note here instead of jumping through the hoops at ANI tonight. I think there may be a 351:
All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
1407: 1184:
All the sources are blogs and rumor sites. There's been no official confirmation of any kind. This may well be the correct title, but that does not excuse the premature page move. --
189:
I’m no editor and can’t write for toffee (obviously), I also don’t have access to any of the print publications which could provide useful information. Could you take a look at the
290: 859:
Hi. I suspect that you're misinterpreting the guideline, but we can attempt to obtain community consensus if you think it would help. Please feel free to nominate the template at
1405:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 680: 518:
in the Spanish Knowledge (XXG). I've gotten to the point with him that I believe an indefinite block to be necessary, so I've started a section to that effect at WP:ANI.
239:
article, which as we know is the same building. I can't move the one (200 Public Square) to the correct title with its new name until the other one is deleted. Thanks
334: 258:
shouldn't be moved, because while Huntington moved its offices into the building and bought signage rights, they didn't purchase the building's naming rights (see
354:
All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
786:
Now it looks like the original article is being considered for deletion. Maybe I should wait to find out what will occur before removing the new article. FWiW
1463:
Hi there. There were no problems with your edit. If you look at my edit summary, I was attempting to undo well-intentioned but counterproductive edits by
753:
article shouldn't exist, and has twice redirected the page to other targets, and now we have a second version of the article that you just created. As a
363:
Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at
994: 348:
Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
445:
trying to put as much stuff together as I possibly can and want to make it really easy to fans to find them. Any help would be much appreciated.
510:
Thank you for the warning. I rolled back everything (except a few redirect creations) and left a uw-delete4 warning for blanking pages such as
367: 1467:. It looks like I also unintentionally nuked most of your edit in the process. I think that I've fixed that now. Sorry about the confusion. - 1412: 511: 676:
First, I have revised the category preface in many small ways. Take it as a dozen separate suggestions. This is how I would say it today.
840:
apply. All HSG needs to do is find other reliable sources making the exact same statements as to genealogy, but until then, the use of
1584: 1558: 366:(to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name 683:. This may or may not be useful but Category talk is so uncommon, I have learned since then, that I feel compelled to notify you. 1381: 1349: 907: 289:). This article is currently being considered for deletion. Please consider providing input at the article's discussion page: 197:
sections that I’ve typed up in this sandbox. There rough (and incomplete) but should give an idea of the direction I’m taking
1034: 155: 150: 145: 140: 135: 130: 125: 115: 110: 105: 100: 95: 90: 85: 80: 254:
The articles refer to two different buildings. They're both tagged with their coords, so you can easily see the difference.
1401: 587:). My intent was to post on that user's talk page. Could you, as an administrator, please tell me how to address this? 232: 1229: 955: 921: 874: 947: 925: 686:
For what it's worth, I believe the FCC (Cleveland Forest Citys) is the only NABBP club that I retained on my watchlist.
652: 601: 307: 900: 673:
Hi, I am writing promptly just in case this is useful and you are passing through all of the NABBP player categories.
548:. It was my first page merge, and I had no clue what to do with the talk pages. i'll know next time :) Thanks again! 951: 38: 807: 813:
The relative page is BMW Zagato Coupe not BMW Z4 Zagato Coupe see articles on Autocar.co.uk and Evo.co.uk Thanks
165: 1588: 1365:
Thanks for correcting the template on my talkpage. I was having very slow internet as well as computer speed.
757:, the article lacks its attribution history, and probably should be deleted. If you agree, you can tag it as 679:
Second, when I worked on categories a few years ago, I commonly made some report on Category talk pages. See
1562: 1438: 1277: 639: 588: 413: 294: 244: 1580: 1554: 1551:
as he did on Saturday Night Live recently so a few people (like me) might come looking for the reference.
1506: 1337: 235:
for the Huntington Bank Building. It contains misinformation, and as well is a stub compared to the larger
1445:? It was fully explained in the edit summary, and was a completely reasonable and useful improvement. 580: 1118: 754: 564:
Glad I could help. You did all of the heavy lifting—I just mopped up a bit afterwards. You did good. -
1510: 1502: 1464: 924:, with or without a redirect? Would that retain the article history? (A better article title would be 1533: 1518: 1420: 1384: 1345: 946:
I believe I misread the article history. I think I see what happened now. The article was created at
47: 17: 489: 448: 1177: 1102: 726: 711: 493: 452: 279: 1486: 1455: 1273: 1212: 1189: 1160: 972: 937: 886: 746: 638:
Oh, I've used that template many times before. I wasn't sure it applied in this case. Thanks.
409: 285: 240: 171: 1241: 1079: 1030:
Nah, it appears that any article with that tag will appear on the special section page anyway.
849: 818: 556: 523: 255: 236: 217: 259: 1537: 1126: 1042: 1002: 771: 761: 619: 545: 390: 167: 61: 1014: 860: 1541: 1514: 1468: 1416: 1368: 1341: 1318: 1257: 1199: 1137: 1018: 959: 912: 864: 778: 626: 565: 263: 1577:
Dude doesn't even know about the great Cena/Lewis feud of 2011. Do you even lift, bro?
1256:
which you disagree, please simply move the page back instead of edit warring over it. -
1545: 1536:
page. I don't doubt that it was spam as you suggest, but the page ought to redirect to
1252: 1172: 1095: 929: 836:
originality of research or presentation, then the "telephone directory" exemption does
791: 734: 1592: 1566: 1522: 1488: 1471: 1457: 1424: 1390: 1353: 1322: 1281: 1260: 1245: 1216: 1202: 1193: 1179: 1164: 1140: 1130: 1107: 1083: 1046: 1021: 1006: 976: 962: 941: 915: 890: 867: 853: 822: 795: 781: 738: 698: 660: 629: 609: 568: 558: 527: 497: 456: 417: 394: 315: 266: 248: 221: 1481: 1450: 1208: 1185: 1156: 968: 933: 882: 694: 169: 1237: 1075: 845: 814: 718: 549: 519: 213: 1136:
I shared some half-formed thoughts. I hope I didn't make things more confusing. -
1449:
only wonder at the agenda of someone who does that. Care to explain yours? --
1122: 1038: 998: 400:
How does one go about freeing up a name for an article that was previously used?
386: 374: 364: 330: 46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1548: 1314: 1060: 967:
Thanks for figuring this out. I was puzzled about the article history too. --
832:
You might wish to ask someone who will tell you the difference - if there is
1066:
I don't think a merge is the best thing to do, but please take a look here:
787: 730: 1117:
I think you could contribute usefully to the discussion recently opened at
690: 373:
If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at
200: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1292: 541: 750: 722: 707: 1198:
Thanks for letting me know. Responded on the article's talk page. -
828:
Genealogies in a copyrighted book are not telephone directory lists
1067: 515: 474: 431: 379:
Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.
1033:
I agree that things like this are no big deal, as I've mentioned
950:
and remained there for months. A few days ago, it was moved to
1155:
and formally ask that you clean up the mess you have made. --
172: 55: 25: 844:
from a book is a pretty clear copyright violation. Cheers.
408:
become available for use as an article name again. Thanks.
181:
Thinking of doing something potentially monumentally stupid.
1501:
Thank goodness someone else noticed what was going on with
1480:
Cool. Sorry if I reacted a tad too hastily. Thanks. --
717:
Wow, don't know what's happening here but as I was editing
291:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles_for_deletion/The_Really_Big_Show
1442: 1152: 584: 625:, and an administrator will speedy delete the page. - 227:
Two articles for same building, one with wrong info...
681:
Category talk: Cleveland Forest Citys (NABBP) players
928:
but I see that page already exists as a redirect to
1313:on these. Thanks in advance and all the best. -- 777:, and try editing the original article again. - 669:Category:Cleveland Forest Citys (NABBP) players 615:I deleted the page. In the future, you can use 540:Just wanted to say thanks for helping me merge 376:. I will be more than happy to speak with you. 345:Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes. 447:Thank you & regards from rainy London;( 8: 201:http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Minsk59/sandbox 488:like they care... they don't exist anymore 995:Brecksville-Northfield High Level Bridge 989:Brecksville-Northfield High Level Bridge 863:if you would like to pursue deletion. - 1068:http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Golden_set 341:So a few things about the interviews: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 7: 1402:Category:Cleveland Indians templates 1396:Category:Cleveland Indians templates 1291:Concerning your intervention on the 1121:. It's about US metro areas, etc. -- 993:Thanks for improving on my edits on 745:It looks like we have two problems. 512:Category:Lists of tallest structures 1207:Thank you for clearing that up. -- 1151:I'd like to draw your attention to 1059:Hi, thanks for trying to help with 1017:) to the external links section? - 956:List of famous Spanish Legionnaries 922:List of famous Spanish Legionnaires 875:List of famous Spanish Legionnaries 24: 920:What if we moved this article to 881:the correct spelling? Thanks - -- 908:Category:Unprintworthy redirects 473: 430: 277:You have contributed to article 60: 29: 1437:In what sense could my edit to 1304:as an alternative spelling and 1323:11:09, 30 September 2012 (UTC) 1282:00:56, 29 September 2012 (UTC) 1261:14:08, 23 September 2012 (UTC) 1246:05:23, 23 September 2012 (UTC) 1217:15:04, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 1203:12:51, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 952:Knowledge (XXG):Spanish Legion 842:extensive copyrighted material 1: 1593:23:38, 28 December 2012 (UTC) 1567:01:46, 18 December 2012 (UTC) 1523:05:44, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 1489:04:59, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 1472:04:57, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 1458:20:39, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 1194:23:48, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 1180:23:28, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 1165:23:08, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 418:14:54, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 1425:04:00, 30 October 2012 (UTC) 1391:17:54, 27 October 2012 (UTC) 948:List of Spanish Legionnaires 926:List of Spanish Legionnaires 808:The name of BMW Zagato Coupe 579:I created the user page for 395:18:24, 9 February 2012 (UTC) 316:22:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 1540:(which itself redirects to 1532:Hey, I see you deleted the 1354:14:29, 1 October 2012 (UTC) 1141:04:29, 16 August 2012 (UTC) 1131:19:08, 15 August 2012 (UTC) 896:Hi. I tagged the page with 749:apparently thinks that the 267:16:26, 9 January 2012 (UTC) 249:13:50, 9 January 2012 (UTC) 231:Eureka, see my post on the 222:02:00, 5 January 2012 (UTC) 1609: 661:00:20, 20 April 2012 (UTC) 630:13:45, 19 April 2012 (UTC) 610:07:35, 19 April 2012 (UTC) 528:01:55, 25 March 2012 (UTC) 498:19:16, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 457:18:44, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 1413:Categories for discussion 1251:The article was moved by 1113:Requested move discussion 1108:05:39, 12 July 2012 (UTC) 1093:Good point, restored now 1084:01:10, 11 July 2012 (UTC) 977:21:29, 23 June 2012 (UTC) 963:21:23, 23 June 2012 (UTC) 942:19:32, 23 June 2012 (UTC) 916:19:20, 23 June 2012 (UTC) 891:17:58, 23 June 2012 (UTC) 569:04:18, 2 April 2012 (UTC) 559:17:32, 1 April 2012 (UTC) 472: 429: 329:My name is Jonathan Obar 1230:Indiana–Kentucky rivalry 1047:14:01, 9 July 2012 (UTC) 1022:18:23, 8 July 2012 (UTC) 1007:13:53, 8 July 2012 (UTC) 868:21:41, 9 June 2012 (UTC) 854:21:30, 9 June 2012 (UTC) 823:21:00, 30 May 2012 (UTC) 796:03:18, 13 May 2012 (UTC) 782:22:51, 12 May 2012 (UTC) 739:22:40, 12 May 2012 (UTC) 699:00:54, 11 May 2012 (UTC) 575:User page creation error 1439:Florence Foster Jenkins 1430:Florence Foster Jenkins 1236:not this one. Thanks.-- 206:Ignore everything else. 1443:"botched edit attempt" 1015:articles with this tag 1119:Talk:Statistical area 42:of past discussions. 1408:the category's entry 954:and subsequently to 18:User talk:EurekaLott 1434:Hey, EurekaLott. 906:, which adds it to 727:Depend undergarment 712:Depend undergarment 581:User:Juliemccormick 280:The Really Big Show 1300:as the main term, 901:r from misspelling 755:cut and paste move 747:User:Alan Liefting 286:Rizzo on the Radio 91:July–December 2006 1583:comment added by 1557:comment added by 1497:A larger problem? 1415:page. Thank you. 1357: 1340:comment added by 1147:Page move blunder 503: 502: 463: 462: 325:Dear EurekaLott, 256:200 Public Square 237:200 Public Square 178: 177: 86:January–June 2006 54: 53: 48:current talk page 1600: 1595: 1569: 1538:cigar box guitar 1511:User:Rosscoolguy 1503:User:Rosscoolguy 1484: 1465:User:Rosscoolguy 1453: 1441:be considered a 1389: 1377: 1373: 1356: 1334: 1175: 1105: 1098: 905: 899: 776: 770: 766: 760: 657: 649: 644: 624: 618: 606: 598: 593: 554: 546:Picardy (region) 477: 470: 469: 438:Hey there Eureka 434: 427: 426: 423:Hey there Eureka 385:Jonathan Obar -- 312: 304: 299: 173: 64: 56: 33: 32: 26: 1608: 1607: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1578: 1575: 1552: 1542:cigar box banjo 1534:cigar box dobro 1530: 1528:cigar box dobro 1499: 1482: 1451: 1432: 1398: 1387: 1375: 1371: 1366: 1363: 1335: 1330: 1289: 1269: 1233: 1173: 1149: 1115: 1103: 1096: 1091: 1057: 991: 903: 897: 878: 830: 811: 774: 768: 764: 758: 715: 671: 653: 645: 640: 622: 616: 602: 594: 589: 577: 550: 537:Hi EurekaLott, 535: 508: 506:Tsuchiya Hikaru 468: 425: 402: 323: 308: 300: 295: 275: 262:in Crain's). - 229: 183: 174: 168: 69: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1606: 1604: 1574: 1571: 1546:Paul McCartney 1529: 1526: 1498: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1475: 1474: 1431: 1428: 1397: 1394: 1385: 1362: 1359: 1329: 1328:Citing Oneself 1326: 1288: 1285: 1268: 1267:Mood for a Day 1265: 1264: 1263: 1253:User:Nuggets56 1232: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1148: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1114: 1111: 1090: 1087: 1056: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1031: 1025: 1024: 990: 987: 986: 985: 984: 983: 982: 981: 980: 979: 930:Spanish Legion 877: 872: 871: 870: 829: 826: 810: 805: 803: 801: 800: 799: 798: 714: 705: 703: 670: 667: 666: 665: 664: 663: 633: 632: 583:in error (see 576: 573: 572: 571: 534: 531: 507: 504: 501: 500: 484: 483: 478: 467: 464: 461: 460: 441: 440: 435: 424: 421: 405:Northeast Ohio 401: 398: 362: 360: 359: 355: 352: 349: 346: 340: 328: 322: 319: 274: 271: 270: 269: 228: 225: 182: 179: 176: 175: 170: 166: 164: 161: 160: 159: 158: 153: 148: 143: 138: 133: 128: 123: 118: 113: 108: 103: 98: 93: 88: 83: 75: 74: 71: 70: 65: 59: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1605: 1596: 1594: 1590: 1586: 1585:68.227.91.153 1582: 1573:Some admin... 1572: 1570: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1559:68.174.97.122 1556: 1550: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1527: 1525: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1496: 1490: 1487: 1485: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1473: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1456: 1454: 1446: 1444: 1440: 1435: 1429: 1427: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1409: 1404: 1403: 1395: 1393: 1392: 1388: 1382: 1380: 1379: 1360: 1358: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1327: 1325: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1294: 1286: 1284: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1274:Mrmoustache14 1266: 1262: 1259: 1254: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1231: 1228: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1201: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1178: 1176: 1171:this name. -- 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1146: 1142: 1139: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1112: 1110: 1109: 1106: 1101: 1099: 1088: 1086: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1070: 1069: 1064: 1062: 1054: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1023: 1020: 1016: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1004: 1000: 996: 988: 978: 974: 970: 966: 965: 964: 961: 957: 953: 949: 945: 944: 943: 939: 935: 931: 927: 923: 919: 918: 917: 914: 909: 902: 895: 894: 893: 892: 888: 884: 876: 873: 869: 866: 862: 858: 857: 856: 855: 851: 847: 843: 839: 835: 827: 825: 824: 820: 816: 809: 806: 804: 797: 793: 789: 785: 784: 783: 780: 773: 763: 756: 752: 748: 744: 743: 742: 740: 736: 732: 728: 724: 720: 713: 709: 706: 704: 701: 700: 696: 692: 689:Good luck. -- 687: 684: 682: 677: 674: 668: 662: 658: 656: 650: 648: 643: 637: 636: 635: 634: 631: 628: 621: 614: 613: 612: 611: 607: 605: 599: 597: 592: 586: 582: 574: 570: 567: 563: 562: 561: 560: 557: 555: 553: 547: 543: 538: 532: 530: 529: 525: 521: 517: 513: 505: 499: 495: 491: 486: 485: 482: 479: 476: 471: 465: 459: 458: 454: 450: 443: 442: 439: 436: 433: 428: 422: 420: 419: 415: 411: 410:Ryecatcher773 406: 399: 397: 396: 392: 388: 383: 380: 377: 375: 371: 369: 365: 356: 353: 350: 347: 344: 343: 342: 338: 336: 332: 326: 321:MSU Interview 320: 318: 317: 313: 311: 305: 303: 298: 292: 288: 287: 282: 281: 273:Input request 272: 268: 265: 261: 257: 253: 252: 251: 250: 246: 242: 241:Ryecatcher773 238: 234: 226: 224: 223: 219: 215: 209: 207: 203: 202: 198: 196: 192: 187: 180: 163: 162: 157: 154: 152: 149: 147: 144: 142: 139: 137: 134: 132: 129: 127: 124: 122: 119: 117: 114: 112: 109: 107: 104: 102: 99: 97: 94: 92: 89: 87: 84: 82: 79: 78: 77: 76: 73: 72: 68: 63: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 1579:— Preceding 1576: 1553:— Preceding 1531: 1500: 1447: 1436: 1433: 1406: 1400: 1399: 1369: 1364: 1336:— Preceding 1331: 1310: 1290: 1287:Help request 1270: 1234: 1153:this comment 1150: 1116: 1094: 1092: 1074: 1071: 1065: 1058: 992: 879: 841: 837: 833: 831: 812: 802: 719:June Allyson 716: 702: 688: 685: 678: 675: 672: 654: 647:lostpassword 646: 641: 603: 596:lostpassword 595: 590: 578: 551: 539: 536: 509: 480: 446: 437: 404: 403: 384: 381: 378: 372: 361: 339: 327: 324: 309: 302:lostpassword 301: 296: 284: 278: 276: 260:this article 230: 210: 205: 204: 199: 194: 190: 188: 184: 120: 66: 43: 37: 1509:issue with 1469:Eureka Lott 1258:Eureka Lott 1200:Eureka Lott 1138:Eureka Lott 1104:talk to me? 1019:Eureka Lott 960:Eureka Lott 913:Eureka Lott 865:Eureka Lott 779:Eureka Lott 627:Eureka Lott 566:Eureka Lott 382:Sincerely, 331:user:Jaobar 264:Eureka Lott 36:This is an 1544:. Reason: 1515:Rivertorch 1507:competence 1483:Jack of Oz 1452:Jack of Oz 1417:Astros4477 1361:Thank you! 1342:Twilson088 1061:Golden set 1055:Golden set 283:(formerly 1549:plays one 1097:Jimfbleak 490:Tetrapak3 449:Tetrapak3 370:instead. 358:properly. 233:talk page 146:2019–2020 141:2017–2018 136:2015–2016 81:2004–2005 1581:unsigned 1555:unsigned 1350:contribs 1338:unsigned 1209:Scjessey 1186:Scjessey 1157:Scjessey 1089:Prolific 1072:Thanks, 969:MelanieN 934:MelanieN 883:MelanieN 67:Archives 1411:on the 1311:exactly 1306:seviche 1302:ceviche 1298:cebiche 1293:Cebiche 1238:YHoshua 1076:Azylber 846:Collect 819:Robyc73 815:Robyc73 772:db-same 762:db-self 729:. FWiW 620:db-self 552:Accedie 542:Picardy 533:Thanks! 520:Nyttend 214:Minsk59 191:Costume 39:archive 1123:Orlady 1039:Mapsax 1035:before 999:Mapsax 861:WP:TFD 751:Depend 723:Depend 708:Depend 642:Levdr1 591:Levdr1 387:Jaobar 297:Levdr1 1386:Talk」 1315:E4024 1272:up.-- 932:.) -- 481:Hey:) 466:Hey:) 195:Music 16:< 1589:talk 1563:talk 1519:talk 1421:talk 1346:talk 1319:talk 1278:talk 1242:talk 1213:talk 1190:talk 1161:talk 1127:talk 1080:talk 1043:talk 1037::) 1003:talk 973:talk 938:talk 887:talk 850:talk 792:talk 788:Bzuk 735:talk 731:Bzuk 725:and 710:and 695:talk 655:talk 604:talk 585:here 544:and 524:talk 516:this 494:talk 453:talk 414:talk 391:talk 368:HERE 335:HERE 310:talk 245:talk 218:talk 193:and 156:2022 151:2021 131:2014 126:2013 121:2012 116:2011 111:2010 106:2009 101:2008 96:2007 1376:che 1372:ani 1367:··· 1174:JOJ 838:not 834:any 767:or 691:P64 293:. 1591:) 1565:) 1521:) 1423:) 1378:nu 1352:) 1348:• 1321:) 1280:) 1244:) 1215:) 1192:) 1163:) 1129:) 1100:- 1082:) 1063:. 1045:) 1005:) 975:) 940:) 904:}} 898:{{ 889:) 852:) 821:) 794:) 775:}} 769:{{ 765:}} 759:{{ 741:. 737:) 697:) 659:) 623:}} 617:{{ 608:) 526:) 496:) 455:) 416:) 393:) 314:) 247:) 220:) 1587:( 1561:( 1517:( 1419:( 1383:/ 1374:s 1370:V 1344:( 1317:( 1276:( 1240:( 1211:( 1188:( 1159:( 1125:( 1078:( 1041:( 1001:( 971:( 936:( 885:( 848:( 817:( 790:( 733:( 693:( 651:( 600:( 522:( 492:( 451:( 412:( 389:( 306:( 243:( 216:( 50:.

Index

User talk:EurekaLott
archive
current talk page

2004–2005
January–June 2006
July–December 2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015–2016
2017–2018
2019–2020
2021
2022
http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Minsk59/sandbox
Minsk59
talk
02:00, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
talk page
200 Public Square
Ryecatcher773
talk
13:50, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
200 Public Square

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑