1238:
better. I worried that the article will fail in the first effort, and then maybe on the second round we can get there. My son is going away for 3 weeks July 18 (to see his mom, he's 3), so I'll have time during the day before I work to make some bigger contributions to the article. It's hard right now with him interrupting me all the time! :-) I'm glad to see the effort some are putting into the article, but the size has grown over 10 KB! Oh well. Have a good rest of your vacation! :-)
314:
286:
795:, running up to 1992 and then onwards to all the divisions that exist now, and separate pages for corps and squadrons etc exactly on the RAF model, not combined pages. I've got access to masses of information - I'll send you a copy of Feskov et al 2004 if you want to interpret the Russian - and on aircraft numbers, I've got access to all the recent back issues of the Military Balance, plus of course there's globalsecurity.org and others available too.
31:
1287:
and I will be for a couple of years (working and studying at the same time do take a lot of my free time ...) However, I'll try to pop in now and then and give you a hand with any articles you guys think they need a good work-over. It's better that you coordinate this thing because I won't have much time for other issues than editing. Anyway, I'll be glad to help wherever and whenever possible. Thanks again and enjoy your vacation!
328:
1672:
272:
258:
244:
356:
370:
342:
1500:
that to each of the sections to answer some of the concerns in the FAC feedback. I'm also going to try to add stuff about espionage and such to each of the sections for the same reason, rather than having a section for espionage. Ugh. I hate how large the article is, but I can't seem to do a whole lot to shrink it down. So it looks like this is still a work in progress.
300:
1756:
and BTR 50/60/70/80/90s for the wheeled. So it depends what you count as in store, and in what condition. If you want to change the figures, go ahead, but remember to reference the change properly and remove the old reference totally, otherwise we'll have
Warfare.ru numbers appearing to come from the IISS. Cheers
1001:
Truman, the Stalin article is a more general focus on world events, taken in a
European then Asian context as it relates to the CW. The CW article does not really have much to say about what happened with Asia. I can see how Stalin would have thought himself surrounded...anyway...here's my (minimal) effort:
1172:
1771:
Of course - I totally agree. That 23,000 is total in store and also being used, and should only be understood that way. I doubt now that any T-55s remain in any line units expect perhaps some Bases for
Storage of Weapons and Equipment, for example. As I said, feel free to change the numbers, but make
1755:
and
Warfare.ru use different counting rules. IISS Military Balance 2008 lists 23,000 MBT, 250-300 T-90 by the end of 2008, 4500 T-80, 9500 T-72L/M, 3000 T-72, 4000 T-64A/B, 500 T-62, and 1,200 T-55. Then there's 15,140+ BMDs and BMPs, and 9,900 tracked and wheeled APCs. BTR-Ds, MT-LBs are the tracked
1499:
Hey...it seems that the FAC is going down in flames, so I went ahead and rewrote the "Containment" section, and broke it down into two pieces (so far): Europe and Asia. I also tidied up the prose a little bit, too. I'll be working on adding some sub-sections like "Culture and Media" or something like
1286:
Thanks, Eurocopter, it's good to edit here again! ;) First of all, congratulations for all the good articles you wrote. You did a hell of a job, especially in the field of
Romanian military history. Kudos to you! Secondly, sorry for not being here to help you guys, but I've been pretty busy lately...
1034:
I don't blame you on changing your mind. My biggest complaint is that this whole section is way too big in comparison to the rest of the article. And now its grown even bigger to give it more balance. I cut out a few things in my sandbox that I did, and reworded a few things. Maybe I'll have a chance
1000:
Hey
Eurocopter, I'm trying (without much success, I'm afraid) to integrate some material from the Stalin article into the "Containment" section. One of the problems is that many of the things in the Stalin article aren't referenced, and another is that while the CW article really does focus a lot on
1263:
No finding any books at the book store, so I'll hit the library to see what I can find. Meanwhile, have a look at my CWSandbox to see what I've done with the containment section. I'm about half done, but it's coming along. It will be a major rewrite of what's there now. Let me know what you think.
1689:
status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient
468:
page, and wondered if you might be able to improve this in any way, or at least have access to more sources. The
Romanian article has more info, but appears to use the same (uncited/non-footnoted) sources. At any rate, I didn't see any edits from you on the page history, so I thought you might be
1519:
Eurocopte Tigre, I think it is a shame the "Transylvania" page has no link to
Michael The Brave in its history chapter. Romania and Transylvania relations are not properly represented. You were very active in Michael The Brave page, you should do it! I dont think I am Romanio-centrist to ask for
753:
Thanks for all your hard work on adding the strategic bomber and transport regiments to this page. However one thing you did for readability, at least in my browser, doesn't help; the extra title lines, which display out of line after each section break. Would you mind if I removed them until we
1237:
I'm going to the book store today to see what I can find. Should be fun! And yeah, there's a little bit of some edit warring going on with that lead paragraph, and then the "dubious" tag...I sorta worried that it would happen that people would see the FAC and make the article worse, rather than
1098:
Hi, thanks for completing my comments. I see you have done wonderful things with the article, and I thank you. I don't think I can fully support the article *yet* because of a discussion that has just gotten underway at the talk page. Anyway, the Cold War is a really interesting topic and I am
919:
You closed this review premature. So far there were comments about what needs to be done to improve the article, but there was not yet a reply by
Yannismarou who nominated the article for review. In such cases you should first ask whether there was work in progress before closing the review.
565:
of policy pages we have here, specifically WP:RS and WP:V. A much better response would have been an explanation of why it doesn't meet our criteria. It is easy to forget that some people haven't been around here as long as we have and don't know all the lingo, or even our basic standards.
813:
corps, until 1998, with the Air Forces' divisions, which is inaccurate from a historical perspective, not to mention that there may be also Air Forces corps yet to discover (there have been a lot of disbandments, if you check out the pre-92 lists on vad777's site or the old issues of AFM)
444:
Hi, I noticed that you closed the A-class review on the Erich
Hartmann article. I assume that the consensus was that the article meets the A-class criteria. My question is who updates the Erich Hartmann talk page and elevates the article to A-class status? Thanks so much.
525:
141:
article, which have eventually passed the A-class review. Since then I have been steadily expanding the article (my goal is to FA it one day), but in recent days a content dispute is threatening to destabilize this article; your comments would be much appreciated
1748:- it's not there. My source, Feskov's 'The Soviet Army during the period of Cold War' does not list it as a Guards formation, and the reference in the 2008 War article does not list the full name of the formation. I would guess that it is not a Guards formation.
1150:
Hi - I think this article should be of some interest to you. I could only find one real reference, but if you have more to add (like details of where precisely the forts are, or particulars of their design, or a photo), by all means go ahead and expand.
693:
Yes, I think it'd be the first re-review (at least since the original set was done when the review process first started). I think we're just going to have to accept that an article going through a review is in an undetermined level on the scale.
207:
and you are cordially invited to participate. This time, the task is housekeeping. As ever, there are awards galore, plus there's a bit of friendly competition built-in, with a race for bronze, silver and gold wikis! You can sign up, in advance,
581:
I saw your reply on the assessment page and it was appreciated. I interpreted your first comment as being bitey and dismissive of the request for help which is why I commented on it. To me, it was obvious that the user was not privy to the
1118:
Dear Eurocopter, you are a member of Wikiproject Military History, and I would like to notify you that a new Wiki has been made for Military History. If you are interested in participating in this project, please follow the following
1625:
of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank
1332:
of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank
659:
of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank
418:
of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank
113:
of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank
1073:
Oh, and I am glad to see the containment section shrink! It's been a complaint of mine for a while, I just haven't had the energy to pare it down the way I did with the background and post WWII sections. So, thanks for doing this!
777:, and an independent squadrons one later on. I think you'll probably find there's a list of divisions of the USAF somewhere, even if only a category. Would you also mind putting a source on that figure for Backfire numbers? Cheers
1550:
898:
if you have the map - and I will insert the military part (troops, movements and so on) it is possible. Designing a map is to much work (and currently there is much to do in my job). let me knwo what maps you have in mind.
414:
109:
1621:
1328:
586:
that we have all become accustomed. My post boiled down to asking for a bit more tact when dealing with the newbies those who request re-assessment and try and help them to understand the culture round here a bit more.
655:
1359:
491:
1099:
available to help out with anything on the page if you need me. I know a lot about the Cold War period of the mid-to-late 1970s to 1991, so please let me know if you need any assistance. Thanks and best,
1830:
Sorry, I am so stupid, I saw Russian userboxes, that one which shows u come from Romania I missed. I cannot belive... But still, we are also "ortodox brothers" :),so Hello my Romanian friend...--
883:
Hi Noclador, would it be possible for you to edit maps, therefore make battle maps if I provide you a model and all the informations? I can send you a model through email if you want.. Cheers, --
634:
Just thought I'd ask if you were interested in joining the WikiProject. People have their names on it, but aren't very active, as far as I can tell. Of course, I'm guilty of this, too!
1582:
1649:
Hi Eurocopter tigre, you mentioned something with maps back in June... I'm swamped with work and am unsure if I had already respond you... Anyway - what maps do you need? --
1693:
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following
939:
The user wanting to add the montage is pretty insistent, and I've added what I can, but another editor adding $ .02/€.02 worth of comment would be a good thing. Thanks!
856:
Hello. In light of the fact that it is the first book the U.S. government ever went to court to censor before its publication(!), I was hoping you could help improve the
791:
Thankyou Eurocopter but would you mind if I changed the titles? All these formations have lots of lineage to Soviet corps, divisions, and squadrons, so I'd rather have
980:
Would you also mind commenting at the RfC on the Infantry divisions 1917-1957? Be good to get some more input there so we can bring the discussion to a close. Regards
561:
My bitey comment was left because "Again, it does not meet by far criteria No.1." did not seem to be welcoming to me. It was obvious that the user wasn't aware of the
1136:
770:
1706:
734:
Thanks for the assessment - but I'm slightly curious as to why you've marked it as a no for structure? There's a lead, and sections, what's missing?
285:
1702:
861:
313:
1422:
e din anul 2008, ceea ce inseamna ca desi probabil e planificata transformarea brigazii intr-un regiment, deocamdata brigada 69 e inca brigada.
1722:
1530:
857:
850:
1387:
Im attempting to create a List of naval air arm engagments during world war on my user page, do u have any good sites that would help me?
774:
1791:
1777:
1761:
985:
970:
833:
819:
800:
792:
782:
759:
607:
1049:
I don't have any access to the works cited in this article at this point. I guess I'll have to invest in a few of these books. Cheers!
1690:
information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
809:
No problems with Sov/Rus delineation, but can we separate corps and divisions? What you do there if you keep them together is mix the
603:
1563:
327:
628:
94:
1745:
1002:
683:
I'd guess that the easiest way to go about it would be to put it up for another A-Class review (to consider both questions).
89:
84:
72:
67:
59:
1144:
1786:
Personally, I'd stick with the IISS data, maybe adding the context as per my above statements. But do as you wish...
888:
613:
Hi! I have a feeling these two will interest you - they're certainly in need of expansion, if you are so inclined.
38:
1850:
1534:
1505:
1269:
1243:
1227:
1079:
1054:
1040:
1025:
1010:
947:
739:
639:
1671:
209:
196:
925:
271:
257:
1485:
450:
243:
1526:
299:
507:
499:
1352:
1559:
1370:
1125:
884:
1710:
1685:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the
965:. Also, as above, see what you think of my changes at the Russian corps and divisions article. Regards
355:
1835:
1816:
369:
341:
1681:
1501:
1303:
1265:
1239:
1223:
1075:
1050:
1036:
1021:
1006:
943:
869:
735:
713:
if you wouldn't mind seeing if it now comes up to the quality expected of a B-Class article. Cheers!
635:
618:
47:
17:
1597:
1187:
1730:
1605:
1104:
921:
695:
684:
544:
1831:
1812:
1654:
1634:
1481:
1341:
1311:
1292:
904:
718:
668:
446:
427:
143:
122:
1451:
De asemenea uite un batalion care a fost in Brigada 1 Logistica iar acum in Brigada 4 LOGISTICA.
1190:
articles through A-Class and Peer Reviews, during the period March-May 2008, please accept this
583:
562:
1411:
Salut. Am vazut ca ai inceput din nou sa lucrezi la RoLF Structure, si m-am apucat si eu. Uite
1864:
1195:
503:
215:
171:
153:
1476:
754:
figure out how we can line them up properly (I'm sure there are experts round here to help)?
495:
1555:
1396:
1363:
1120:
474:
398:
393:
Wow i agree with ut thoughts about Kosovo and Russia. I dislike NATO and US bases in Europe.
1716:
1787:
1773:
1757:
1253:
1152:
981:
966:
865:
829:
815:
796:
778:
755:
728:
614:
592:
571:
1520:
Mihai Viteazul being mentioned as part of Transylvanian heritage. You may contact me at
1854:
1726:
1601:
1100:
540:
524:
438:
1871:
1839:
1820:
1795:
1781:
1765:
1734:
1658:
1638:
1609:
1568:
1538:
1509:
1489:
1400:
1377:
1345:
1315:
1296:
1273:
1258:
1247:
1231:
1209:
1157:
1108:
1083:
1058:
1044:
1029:
1014:
989:
974:
951:
929:
908:
892:
873:
837:
823:
804:
786:
763:
743:
722:
698:
687:
672:
643:
622:
596:
575:
548:
510:
478:
454:
431:
402:
229:
185:
160:
126:
1650:
1630:
1337:
1307:
1288:
900:
714:
664:
484:
423:
138:
118:
1585:
is really the appropriate place to be having an extended discussion, I've started a
828:
Good point. I won't split it immediately, but add a few more before I do so. Cheers
1860:
1586:
149:
1391:
Actually I kind of gave up on it, if your still interested reply to this message--
1699:
Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged
1521:
1392:
470:
394:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1583:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history/Assessment#Requests for assessment
810:
588:
567:
1459:
1686:
1420:
710:
1430:
469:
interested in the aircraft if you hadn't seen the page before. Thanks. -
204:
1549:
There is some disagreement about citation style. Please write your idea
1362:, I think you should know that the World War II Portal is now featured.
1590:
1322:
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)
962:
465:
408:
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)
1615:
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)
649:
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)
492:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history/World War II task force
103:
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)
1596:'s talk page in regard to whether or not it is within the scope of
1811:
Just to say hello to my Russian freind. Greetings from Serbia!:)--
214:. I look forward to seeing you on the drive page! All the best, --
1468:
La Brigada 61 Vanatori de Munte (Divizia 4) uite un batalion nou.
1752:
1171:
25:
860:
article as part of an effort to make it worthy of becoming a
1670:
1419:
3 sunt din Brigada 69 Artilerie Mixta (divzia 4-a). Linkul
963:
http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Moreschi#Block_of_Mrg3105
539:
Thanks for reverting all that vandalism on my talk page :)
1121:
http://www.militaryhistorywiki.scribblewiki.com/Main_Page
1772:
sure to change the IISS ref to a warfare.ru ref. Cheers
1694:
961:
Hi Eurocopter, you may (or may not) wish to comment at
942:
PS Thanks for all your work on the Cold War article.
1383:
List of naval air arm engagments during world war II
1721:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
775:
List of Aviation Divisions of the Russian Air Force
793:List of Aviation Divisions of the Soviet Air Force
1186:In recognition of your contribution in improving
1849:You forgot to update the MILHIST templates at
1252:I'll certainly do my best - have a good time!
1358:Since you are one of the coordinators at the
769:Thanks Eurocopter. The precedent for this is
292:Tireless Contributor Barnstar (1000 articles)
8:
771:List of Wings of the United States Air Force
1035:to see it tonight after I get out of work.
1667:Image source problem with Image:MLI-84.jpg
494:, could you lend me some arbitration on a
996:Integration of Stalin into the CW article
522:
191:News! Tag & Assess 2008 is coming ...
1302:OK, Eurocopter, I'll have a look at the
1629:This has been an automated delivery by
1336:This has been an automated delivery by
663:This has been an automated delivery by
422:This has been an automated delivery by
320:Working Man's Barnstar (3000 articles)
239:
117:This has been an automated delivery by
1705:. If the image is copyrighted under a
1222:I hope you're having a good vacation!
1169:
935:Please comment on the Cold War montage
334:Barnstar of Diligence (4000 articles)
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1861:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
150:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
7:
915:A-class review of Greco-Persian Wars
858:The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence
851:The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence
709:Hi there. I've expanded the lead of
629:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Cold War
24:
1719:after 14:56, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
1180:The Content Review Medal of Merit
533:The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
137:In March you've commented on the
1170:
1020:Absolutely! Permission granted.
523:
368:
354:
340:
326:
312:
298:
284:
270:
256:
242:
29:
133:A-class review of Armia Krajowa
1746:List of guards units of Russia
1723:Media copyright questions page
1163:Milhist reviews March-May 2008
1003:User:Hires_an_editor/CWSandbox
490:As one of the coordinators of
1:
1857:with completed B-checklist.--
1441:Batalionul 316 Asigurare Date
1192:Content Review Medal of Merit
773:, so I would rather create a
464:Tigre, I just ran across the
1703:criteria for speedy deletion
278:Three Stripes (600 articles)
1872:20:41, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
1840:16:45, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
1821:10:01, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
1796:14:48, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
1782:17:38, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
1766:18:00, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
1735:14:56, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
1474:Batalionul 26 "Avram Iancu"
1145:Fortifications of Bucharest
1887:
1715:the image will be deleted
1659:22:52, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
1639:01:11, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
1005:. Tell me what you think?
862:featured article candidate
403:11:10, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
264:Two Stripes (400 articles)
230:11:10, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
186:10:00, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
1610:22:41, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
1569:02:15, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
1539:09:10, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
1401:11:35, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
1176:
1158:04:53, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
1109:18:05, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1084:16:54, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1059:16:52, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
1045:20:42, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
1030:15:45, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
1015:14:44, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
990:16:13, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
975:04:00, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
952:14:07, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
930:10:45, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
909:14:55, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
893:12:34, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
874:14:13, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
838:01:02, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
824:22:59, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
805:21:59, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
787:10:11, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
764:01:25, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
744:11:50, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
723:18:21, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
529:
516:Can you believe that guy?
250:One Stripe (200 articles)
161:01:45, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
127:01:11, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
1711:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use
1581:Since I don't feel that
1510:01:43, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
1490:14:14, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
1435:Batalionul 315 Artilerie
1378:21:21, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
1346:18:40, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
1316:12:54, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
1297:07:18, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
1274:04:36, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
1259:14:33, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
1248:14:13, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
1232:13:22, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
1210:02:10, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
699:20:47, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
688:19:31, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
673:00:34, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
644:18:08, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
623:22:46, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
597:21:42, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
576:17:49, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
549:15:14, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
511:09:45, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
479:02:06, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
306:Chevrons (2000 articles)
1675:Image Copyright problem
1457:Batalionul 43 Transport
1428:Batalionul 317 Logistic
1360:World War II task force
1218:Good to see you pop on!
455:09:07, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
432:00:46, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
1751:2. Equipment numbers.
1676:
1515:Michael The Brave link
195:Milhist's new drive –
1851:Lithuanian–Soviet War
1740:Russian Ground Forces
1679:Thanks for uploading
1674:
1114:Military History Wiki
1094:Cold War comments FAC
199:Tag & Assess 2008
42:of past discussions.
1545:Battle of the trench
1304:Romanian Land Forces
362:Second place overall
18:User talk:Eurocopter
1353:Portal:World War II
957:May wish to comment
376:First place overall
348:Third place overall
1701:, as described on
1677:
811:Air Defence Forces
749:Aviation Regiments
1744:1. 19th MRD. See
1641:
1541:
1529:comment added by
1348:
1306:article. Cheers,
1257:
1215:
1214:
1205:
1201:
1156:
675:
608:Academia militară
557:Assessment issues
554:
553:
434:
384:
383:
225:
221:
181:
177:
129:
100:
99:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1878:
1869:
1867:
1707:non-free license
1682:Image:MLI-84.jpg
1628:
1567:
1524:
1523:Mutumesc! Radu
1437:Şimleu Silvaniei
1374:
1367:
1335:
1256:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1188:Military history
1174:
1167:
1166:
1155:
1133:
1131:
1128:
662:
527:
520:
519:
502:? Many thanks!
421:
415:April 2008 issue
372:
358:
344:
330:
316:
302:
288:
274:
260:
246:
236:
235:
227:
223:
219:
183:
179:
175:
158:
156:
116:
110:March 2008 issue
81:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
1886:
1885:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1877:
1876:
1875:
1870:
1865:
1859:
1847:
1828:
1809:
1742:
1669:
1647:
1622:July 2008 issue
1617:
1579:
1554:
1547:
1531:125.162.168.178
1517:
1502:Hires an editor
1497:
1409:
1385:
1372:
1365:
1356:
1329:June 2008 issue
1324:
1284:
1266:Hires an editor
1240:Hires an editor
1224:Hires an editor
1220:
1196:
1165:
1148:
1139:
1129:
1126:
1124:
1116:
1096:
1076:Hires an editor
1051:Hires an editor
1037:Hires an editor
1022:Hires an editor
1007:Hires an editor
998:
959:
944:Hires an editor
937:
917:
881:
854:
751:
736:David Underdown
732:
729:Charles Symonds
707:
681:
651:
636:Hires an editor
632:
611:
559:
518:
488:
462:
442:
410:
391:
378:
377:
373:
364:
363:
359:
350:
349:
345:
336:
335:
331:
322:
321:
317:
308:
307:
303:
294:
293:
289:
280:
279:
275:
266:
265:
261:
252:
251:
247:
216:
203:– goes live on
193:
172:
168:
159:
154:
148:
135:
105:
77:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1884:
1882:
1858:
1855:Sejny Uprising
1846:
1843:
1827:
1824:
1808:
1805:
1803:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1741:
1738:
1668:
1665:
1663:
1646:
1643:
1627:
1616:
1613:
1578:
1572:
1546:
1543:
1516:
1513:
1496:
1493:
1479:
1478:
1470:
1469:
1464:
1462:
1461:
1453:
1452:
1447:
1445:
1444:
1438:
1432:
1424:
1423:
1408:
1407:Ro Land Forces
1405:
1404:
1403:
1384:
1381:
1355:
1350:
1334:
1323:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1283:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1250:
1219:
1216:
1213:
1212:
1183:
1182:
1177:
1175:
1164:
1161:
1147:
1142:
1135:
1115:
1112:
1095:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1061:
997:
994:
993:
992:
958:
955:
936:
933:
922:Wandalstouring
916:
913:
912:
911:
880:
877:
853:
848:
847:
846:
845:
844:
843:
842:
841:
840:
750:
747:
731:
726:
706:
703:
702:
701:
680:
677:
661:
656:May 2008 issue
650:
647:
631:
626:
610:
604:Muzeul militar
601:
600:
599:
558:
555:
552:
551:
536:
535:
530:
528:
517:
514:
487:
482:
461:
458:
441:
439:Erich Hartmann
436:
420:
409:
406:
390:
387:
386:
385:
382:
381:
380:
379:
375:
374:
367:
365:
361:
360:
353:
351:
347:
346:
339:
337:
333:
332:
325:
323:
319:
318:
311:
309:
305:
304:
297:
295:
291:
290:
283:
281:
277:
276:
269:
267:
263:
262:
255:
253:
249:
248:
241:
192:
189:
167:
164:
147:
134:
131:
115:
104:
101:
98:
97:
92:
87:
82:
75:
70:
65:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1883:
1874:
1873:
1868:
1862:
1856:
1852:
1844:
1842:
1841:
1837:
1833:
1825:
1823:
1822:
1818:
1814:
1806:
1804:
1797:
1793:
1789:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1779:
1775:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1763:
1759:
1754:
1749:
1747:
1739:
1737:
1736:
1732:
1728:
1725:. Thank you.
1724:
1720:
1718:
1712:
1708:
1704:
1700:
1696:
1691:
1688:
1684:
1683:
1673:
1666:
1664:
1661:
1660:
1656:
1652:
1644:
1642:
1640:
1636:
1632:
1624:
1623:
1614:
1612:
1611:
1607:
1603:
1599:
1595:
1594:
1588:
1584:
1577:
1573:
1571:
1570:
1565:
1561:
1557:
1552:
1544:
1542:
1540:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1522:
1514:
1512:
1511:
1507:
1503:
1494:
1492:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1477:
1475:
1472:
1471:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1460:
1458:
1455:
1454:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1442:
1439:
1436:
1433:
1431:
1429:
1426:
1425:
1421:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1414:
1413:5 unitati noi
1406:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1382:
1380:
1379:
1376:
1375:
1369:
1368:
1361:
1354:
1351:
1349:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1331:
1330:
1321:
1317:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1282:Welcome back!
1281:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1255:
1251:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1217:
1211:
1208:
1206:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1184:
1181:
1178:
1173:
1168:
1162:
1160:
1159:
1154:
1146:
1143:
1141:
1140:
1138:
1132:
1122:
1113:
1111:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1093:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1004:
995:
991:
987:
983:
979:
978:
977:
976:
972:
968:
964:
956:
954:
953:
949:
945:
940:
934:
932:
931:
927:
923:
914:
910:
906:
902:
897:
896:
895:
894:
890:
886:
878:
876:
875:
871:
867:
863:
859:
852:
849:
839:
835:
831:
827:
826:
825:
821:
817:
812:
808:
807:
806:
802:
798:
794:
790:
789:
788:
784:
780:
776:
772:
768:
767:
766:
765:
761:
757:
748:
746:
745:
741:
737:
730:
727:
725:
724:
720:
716:
712:
704:
700:
697:
692:
691:
690:
689:
686:
678:
676:
674:
670:
666:
658:
657:
648:
646:
645:
641:
637:
630:
627:
625:
624:
620:
616:
609:
605:
602:
598:
594:
590:
585:
580:
579:
578:
577:
573:
569:
564:
563:alphabet soup
556:
550:
546:
542:
538:
537:
534:
531:
526:
521:
515:
513:
512:
509:
505:
501:
497:
493:
486:
485:RAF Tempsford
483:
481:
480:
476:
472:
467:
459:
457:
456:
452:
448:
447:MisterBee1966
440:
437:
435:
433:
429:
425:
417:
416:
407:
405:
404:
400:
396:
388:
371:
366:
357:
352:
343:
338:
329:
324:
315:
310:
301:
296:
287:
282:
273:
268:
259:
254:
245:
240:
238:
237:
234:
233:
232:
231:
228:
226:
213:
212:
206:
202:
201:
200:
190:
188:
187:
184:
182:
165:
163:
162:
157:
151:
145:
140:
139:Armia Krajowa
132:
130:
128:
124:
120:
112:
111:
102:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
80:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1848:
1829:
1810:
1802:
1750:
1743:
1714:
1698:
1692:
1680:
1678:
1662:
1648:
1620:
1618:
1592:
1580:
1575:
1548:
1518:
1498:
1495:Cold War FAC
1480:
1473:
1463:
1456:
1446:
1440:
1434:
1427:
1412:
1410:
1386:
1371:
1364:
1357:
1327:
1325:
1285:
1221:
1197:
1191:
1179:
1149:
1134:
1130:ṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ
1117:
1097:
999:
960:
941:
938:
918:
882:
855:
752:
733:
708:
682:
679:Re: Question
654:
652:
633:
612:
560:
532:
504:Neddyseagoon
489:
463:
443:
413:
411:
392:
217:
210:
198:
197:
194:
173:
170:Good man! --
169:
136:
108:
106:
78:
43:
37:
1525:—Preceding
36:This is an
1788:Buckshot06
1774:Buckshot06
1758:Buckshot06
1598:WP:MILHIST
1587:discussion
1443:"Guruslău"
1254:Biruitorul
1153:Biruitorul
1137:Review Me!
1123:. Cheers,
982:Buckshot06
967:Buckshot06
885:Eurocopter
866:Loremaster
830:Buckshot06
816:Buckshot06
797:Buckshot06
779:Buckshot06
756:Buckshot06
615:Biruitorul
95:Archive 10
1727:Megapixie
1695:this link
1687:copyright
1602:Bellhalla
1101:Happyme22
711:Eric Bols
705:Eric Bols
541:Parsecboy
90:Archive 9
85:Archive 8
79:Archive 7
73:Archive 6
68:Archive 5
60:Archive 1
1717:48 hours
1651:noclador
1631:BrownBot
1527:unsigned
1338:BrownBot
1308:Mentatus
1289:Mentatus
901:noclador
715:Skinny87
665:BrownBot
584:WP:EIEIO
424:BrownBot
205:April 25
166:Op En TF
119:BrownBot
1845:Forgot?
1713:) then
1645:Maps???
496:WP:NPOV
389:i agree
39:archive
1832:Vule91
1813:Vule91
1556:Seyyed
1482:Dapiks
1393:EZ1234
1366:Beware
696:Kirill
685:Kirill
498:point
471:BillCJ
466:IAR 95
460:IAR 95
395:EZ1234
1866:talk
1826:Sorry
1709:(per
1373:ofdog
1204:AVIES
1119:link.
589:Woody
568:Woody
224:AVIES
180:AVIES
155:talk
16:<
1853:and
1836:talk
1817:talk
1792:prof
1778:prof
1762:prof
1753:IISS
1731:talk
1655:talk
1635:talk
1626:you.
1619:The
1606:talk
1600:. —
1593:Czar
1576:Czar
1551:here
1535:talk
1506:talk
1486:talk
1397:talk
1342:talk
1333:you.
1326:The
1312:talk
1293:talk
1270:talk
1244:talk
1228:talk
1200:OGER
1194:, --
1105:talk
1080:talk
1055:talk
1041:talk
1026:talk
1011:talk
986:prof
971:prof
948:talk
926:talk
905:talk
889:talk
879:Maps
870:talk
864:? --
834:prof
820:prof
801:prof
783:prof
760:prof
740:talk
719:talk
669:talk
660:you.
653:The
640:talk
619:talk
593:talk
572:talk
545:talk
508:talk
500:here
475:talk
451:talk
428:talk
419:you.
412:The
399:talk
220:OGER
211:here
176:OGER
144:here
123:talk
114:you.
107:The
1591:SS
1589:on
1574:SS
1553:.--
1415:.
1127:Ṝέđ
146:.--
1838:)
1819:)
1807:Hi
1794:)
1780:)
1764:)
1733:)
1697:.
1657:)
1637:)
1608:)
1537:)
1508:)
1488:)
1399:)
1344:)
1314:)
1295:)
1272:)
1246:)
1230:)
1107:)
1082:)
1057:)
1043:)
1028:)
1013:)
988:)
973:)
950:)
928:)
907:)
899:--
891:)
872:)
836:)
822:)
803:)
785:)
762:)
742:)
721:)
671:)
642:)
621:)
606:,
595:)
574:)
547:)
506:-
477:)
453:)
430:)
401:)
125:)
64:←
1863:|
1834:(
1815:(
1790:(
1776:(
1760:(
1729:(
1653:(
1633:(
1604:(
1566:)
1564:c
1562:-
1560:t
1558:(
1533:(
1504:(
1484:(
1395:(
1340:(
1310:(
1291:(
1268:(
1242:(
1226:(
1202:D
1198:R
1103:(
1078:(
1053:(
1039:(
1024:(
1009:(
984:(
969:(
946:(
924:(
903:(
887:(
868:(
832:(
818:(
799:(
781:(
758:(
738:(
717:(
667:(
638:(
617:(
591:(
570:(
543:(
473:(
449:(
426:(
397:(
222:D
218:R
178:D
174:R
152:|
121:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.