388:? I'd like to look at and probably restore them. I've been frustrated repeatedly by articles containing dead links, and links to content that changed - for example, when someone says something online and then wants to take it back. If you'd rather webcite not be used in such situations (e.g. to document, and archive as evidence, a website's privacy policy and a page on the site that shows that they violate that policy) please let me/your users know. It seems that was not part of the original vision for the tool, but I find it fantastically useful for that purpose. (I'd even be interested in providing support for such use.) I think WebCite (or at least a mention of web archiving tools in general) needs to be mentioned up in the "Citations for world wide web articles" or " Links and ID numbers" sections and I think it's frequently underused and haven't seen it overused.--
687:
464:" – the WebCite-archived pages were all working fine before the site went down. Have you received reports of anyone else experiencing this problem? If so, is there anything that can be done about it, or is the only solution to re-archive the web pages? I am concerned about this, because obviously the reliability of WebCite (which I think fills a pressing need) is in question if there is an irretrievable loss of archived pages each time a server goes down. — Cheers,
800:
the data dump in detail - is there a file with all links, or would we have to parse them? If so, the task would be more realistic if a volunteer could write a script that extracts all the links and builds a database with the citation elements like cited author name, cited article title, cited URL, citing URL (=citing
Knowledge article), perhaps citing article title, citing section within that article etc in columns. --
1010:
136:
financial gain, in these areas. An overly strict interpretation of the COI policy may be counterproductive in assuring the accuracy and quality of articles in
Knowledge. Most "experts" and scientists working in a narrow field have "indirect" conflicts of interest, because they have done a lot of work in that field, so that any contribution in Knowledge could be misconstrued as self-promotion. The recent
922:
699:
481:
How can we "rearchive" pages whose links are now expired? Preserving those links was what WebCite was supposed to do; now that WebCite has lost them they are apparently gone forever. If we had known this was going to happen, we could have preserved the information in a way that was actually reliable.
799:
I am not sure it makes sense to go back and retrospectively archive these links, as they may have changed since they were first cited. I believe the better strategy might be be to start a WebCitebot and going forward archive all new links prospectively. But, we will look into it. I haven't looked at
538:
Being as Eysen hasn't been active on
Knowledge since February, I personally feel this is the wrong way to go about contacting him and that this user Talk page is the wrong place to discuss this matter. I think you should contact him via WebCite or via e-mail (link on his userpage or link on WebCuite
428:
So basically my question is 1) should I use the XML method to improve performance on the server or does it not really matter? and 2) if you want me to use the XML method could the server code easily be modified to also return the shorter URL? Regardless of what method you choose, it is more or less
56:
While I agree you are one of the best folks to help facilitate webcite adoption here at wikipedia, you should remove yourself from any further editing of articles about yourself or your business. Best of luck! Stick around and help us improve the encyclopedia. Feel free to drop any questions my
135:
policies - I agree and will in the future avoid edits in these fields as well as on my own bio. On the other hand, these are the fields I am (academically) working on, and my primary concern is the accuracy of the articles on
Knowledge. In my defense, I have no financial interests, for personal
74:
I want to apologize for overly aggressive opposition to your efforts in offering WebCite as a valuable service to the wikipedia community. I did a poor job of distinguishing between edits to mainspace articles in the encyclopedia and edits to policy articles. There is no doubt that edits to
52:
Despite initial aversion, I think a service such as webcite is likely a good idea for wikipedia to seriously consider. However, a path to such a recommendation will require time and discussion in the community. This would be a major adoption for such a large body of information.
432:
Also, all their any rate limits you want me to set on the script? E.g. no more than 1 archive request every 5 seconds or something like that. I don't anticipate a rate limit causing my script to fall behind the rate needed to keep up with
Knowledge.
455:
Hi, Eysen. Although WebCite seems to be back online, I was distressed to find that a number of web pages that I archived prior to the site going down for server migration appear to have been lost. See, for instance, the articles
818:. This dump contains little else however other than the page id and URL that is linked. If all you want to do is see the format you may want to look at another smaller project, like the english wikisource/wikibooks/wikinews. --
726:
and letting us know we can use WebCite. I must apologize for my comments in that conversation that WebCite was not up to the task. I was obviously wrong. I'm sorry. Again, thank you very much for everything. -
185:) 05:07, 10 December 2008 (UTC) In fact, I know of administrators who regularly edit articles where they have an admitted COI (and not just to deal with issues like vandalism or BLP) without any excuse! --
291:
814:
Well there is the raw wikitext available as well as the pagelinks table which contains all the links of the current version of the page. Documentation on the external links table is available
140:
investigation on the accuracy of
Knowledge vs Encyclopedia Britannica found that very few scientists/experts actually contribute to Knowledge, and I am not sure if that is a good thing. --
778:
Is there any thing you could do on webcite's end to go and archive every link in the dump, then it would just be a matter of adding the links to wikipedia articles. (Dump is available
328:
has been nominated for deletion on the grounds that you, as the primary author, appear to be the subject of the article. Knowledge strongly discourages autobiographical articles (see
103:
and should be avoided by you in the future. However, I can see how this guideline should be less stringent in policy related issues. I'm glad a few other editors have jumped in at
892:
887:
723:
351:
I tried to summarize thi sarticle a little . I suggest you put the prev. version not here, but on a subpage; that is what is usually done as a way of dealing with an Afd.
41:
Your webcite idea is interesting, but your approach here deserves some re-thinking. Based on your username and edit history, I assume you hold close relations with a
605:
These problems probably had to do with a server move during the time - all snapshots should be restored. And yes - email is a far better way of contacting me. --
211:
FYI, I noticed some misconfigurations of your mail server that were causing deliverability problems; emailing jcordiner with the details and suggested fixes.--
275:
107:. I'll try to help or stay out of the way in crafting recommendations and help documentation for archiving web sources. Best of luck, particularly with
960:
Ive requested a list of all the urls that you currently have archived, I may be able to integrate that information a lot easier than querying your site.
893:
http://com.nytimes./2004/11/29/international/europe/29cnd-ukra.html?hp&ex=1101790800&en=93f5ca7f542c1962&ei=5094&partner=wikipedia
888:
http://nytimes.com/2004/11/29/international/europe/29cnd-ukra.html?hp&ex=1101790800&en=93f5ca7f542c1962&ei=5094&partner=wikipedia
1071:
713:
414:
to add a citation. I read the documentation and see that I can have it return XML instead through use of the returnxml parameter.
149:
By all means, encourage any academic friends to participate ;). Glad you found the links useful. Drop a line if you need help.
1075:
46:
1050:
706:
You have been identified as a valued contributor and your efforts are appreciated. We are honored to present you with the
585:
310:
264:
265:
Wikipedia_talk:Citing_sources#Proposal_for_policy_on_freely_available_sources_--_encouraging_open_content_.26_open_access
244:
1063:
1021:
999:
298:
1017:
1003:
393:
1067:
941:
230:
Looking through your edits, it doesn't seem like you are filling out edit summaries. Could you please do so? See
389:
974:
248:
231:
815:
712:
and we thank you for donating your time, expertise and effort to
Knowledge. Keep up the good work. Thanks. (
634:
425:
format. I'd prefer to link to the shorter version if I had the choice, but obviously its not a big deal.
384:
Can you reply here (I'm watching this page) with a diff link to the edits you made that are mentioned here:
283:
410:
The programming for WebCiteBOT is coming along nicely & I'm about to implement the part where it calls
548:
487:
332:. My recommendation is that you create a sub-article on your user page, and transfer the content there.
986:
907:
738:
656:
978:
902:
1097:
333:
1079:
441:
385:
367:
686:
823:
787:
667:
642:
593:
505:
801:
757:
606:
141:
370:
states that user pages are not to be directly linked to the encyclopedia pages proper. Regards
1087:
1046:
623:
544:
483:
325:
306:
271:
80:
42:
982:
730:
497:
240:
32:
1093:
574:
216:
190:
182:
961:
437:
371:
329:
157:
119:
104:
65:
1033:
819:
783:
722:
Thanks very much for WebCite. And a BIG thank you for joining in the conversation at
663:
638:
589:
501:
132:
100:
76:
18:
951:
522:
465:
302:
782:). Keep in mind this includes duplicates so a check for that needs to be added. --
292:
here (Knowledge:WikiProject_Clinical_medicine/Writing_medical_articles#References)
418:
1032:
While all constructive contributions to
Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be
461:
457:
287:
235:
108:
96:
637:. Perhaps you could review it for clarity and comprehensiveness? Thank you. --
570:
562:
518:
212:
186:
178:
169:
that states that someone can't edit articles where they have a COI; COI is a
267:. The proposal will need a bit a revision-- as is clear by the comments.
153:
115:
61:
877:
521:") are also not accessible any more. This is a serious problem. — Cheers,
973:
A much smaller wiki that would be easier to experiment with would be the
872:
353:
92:
88:
1086:
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the
386:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Citing_sources/Archive_14#WebCite
630:
558:
540:
422:
279:
84:
22:
908:
http://com.orlandosentinel.www./sns-ap-us-obit-arthur,0,3740045.story
862:
903:
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/sns-ap-us-obit-arthur,0,3740045.story
857:
177:
that there should be such a policy, but currently there isn't one.--
557:
The problem seems to have been addressed (completely, or in part);
1101:
992:
966:
827:
809:
791:
765:
748:
698:
671:
646:
614:
597:
578:
552:
539:
or elsewhere), and feel this situation should be discussed on the
532:
517:
I have just noticed that pages that I archived back in 2008 (see "
509:
491:
475:
445:
397:
374:
357:
336:
314:
253:
220:
194:
160:
144:
122:
68:
411:
586:
Knowledge talk:Citing sources#Apparent loss of data by WebCite
1008:
920:
417:
The downside I see is that it only gives the archive URL in
779:
1074:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
1056:
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing
934:
290:). Stuff on writing medical articles for Knowledge is
174:
1039:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
724:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject
External links/Webcitebot2
49:
is a must before further editing here at wikipedia.
929:Hello, Eysen. Check your email – you've got mail!
774:Archiving Every Link in the January 15, 2011 Dump
363:User page linked directly to encyclopedia proper
45:, the inventor of . If so, a close reading of
652:Also, you might be interested in placing this
419:http://www.webcitation.org/query?id=1234567890
921:
38:has some nice starting points for new users.
8:
500:. It is hit and miss, but worth an effort.--
111:related issues. Thanks for all your work.
28:Welcome to wikipedia! If you haven't yet,
696:
684:
278:. Among other things, you'll find a few
839:
629:I have completed an essay on how to use
1045:notice, but please explain why in your
878:http://org.journowiki./User_talk:Amgine
756:You're welcome. Apology accepted :-) --
873:http://journowiki.org/User_talk:Amgine
342:The result of the AfD was keep. --IRDT
7:
1090:of each individual file for details.
559:http://www.webcitation.org/5bdrUhyYu
423:http://www.webcitation.org/1aB2cD3eF
977:, which has an external links dump
1034:deleted for any of several reasons
1024:because of the following concern:
863:http://org.journowiki./User:Amgine
14:
1059:{{proposed deletion/dated files}}
1042:{{proposed deletion/dated files}}
858:http://journowiki.org/User:Amgine
697:
685:
451:Apparent loss of data by WebCite
1028:unused, low-res, no obvious use
1018:File:JMIR Publications logo.png
1004:File:JMIR Publications logo.png
421:format rather than the shorter
412:http://webcitation.org/archive
47:Knowledge:Conflict of interest
1:
993:14:24, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
967:20:28, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
828:05:14, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
579:00:34, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
561:(archived in '08 and used in
263:I left some more comments at
259:Open content/sources, CLINMED
254:02:32, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
221:05:07, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
195:00:20, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
99:etc. were inappropriate as a
937:at any time by removing the
810:19:36, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
792:09:47, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
766:19:40, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
749:19:30, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
672:04:06, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
647:01:56, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
615:19:21, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
543:Talk page rather than here.
358:04:36, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
337:01:45, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
315:23:03, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
165:For the record, there is no
161:01:47, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
145:19:47, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
131:Thanks for pointing out the
123:08:07, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
69:21:52, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
1078:allows discussion to reach
584:This is being discussed at
398:18:21, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
270:You are welcome to drop by
1117:
1070:exist. In particular, the
446:04:20, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
375:16:16, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
234:for more details. Thanks!
1102:01:00, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
1064:proposed deletion process
598:21:59, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
553:08:29, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
533:05:06, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
510:21:59, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
492:23:27, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
476:16:39, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
975:simple English Knowledge
805:
761:
709:Valued Contributor Award
693:Valued Contributor Award
610:
297:Any case, I hope to see
232:Knowledge:Edit summaries
635:Knowledge:Using WebCite
1030:
1013:
926:
284:User:Samir (The Scope)
1026:
1022:proposed for deletion
1012:
925:You have new messages
924:
837:An example would be:
390:IReceivedDeathThreats
380:Fixing Citing sources
1076:files for discussion
1051:the file's talk page
981:, only 35K in size.
274:and hang-out at the
207:WebCite email issues
133:conflict of interest
101:conflict of interest
678:Thanks for the help
662:on your userpage.--
368:Knowledge:User page
1068:deletion processes
1014:
935:remove this notice
927:
403:WebCite/WebCiteBOT
175:recently suggested
1000:Proposed deletion
991:
913:
912:
720:
719:
326:Gunther Eysenbach
313:
252:
81:Gunther Eysenbach
43:Gunther Eysenbach
1108:
1091:
1061:
1060:
1044:
1043:
1011:
989:
985:
958:
956:
950:
946:
940:
923:
840:
745:
733:
701:
689:
682:
681:
661:
655:
530:
525:
498:Internet Archive
473:
468:
429:the same to me.
320:AfD notification
305:
301:in the future.
238:
37:
31:
1116:
1115:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1085:
1072:speedy deletion
1058:
1057:
1041:
1040:
1009:
1007:
987:
964:
959:
954:
948:
944:
942:You've got mail
938:
932:
776:
743:
739:
731:
680:
659:
653:
633:for Knowledge:
627:
526:
523:
469:
466:
453:
405:
382:
365:
349:
322:
261:
228:
209:
35:
29:
26:
12:
11:
5:
1114:
1112:
1082:for deletion.
1062:will stop the
1006:
997:
996:
995:
970:
969:
963:
931:
919:
915:
911:
910:
905:
900:
896:
895:
890:
885:
881:
880:
875:
870:
866:
865:
860:
855:
851:
850:
847:
844:
835:
834:
833:
832:
831:
830:
775:
772:
771:
770:
769:
768:
741:
718:
717:
703:
702:
695:
690:
679:
676:
675:
674:
626:
621:
620:
619:
618:
617:
582:
581:
555:
515:
514:
513:
512:
452:
449:
404:
401:
381:
378:
364:
361:
348:
345:
344:
343:
321:
318:
260:
257:
227:
226:Edit summaries
224:
208:
205:
204:
203:
202:
201:
200:
199:
198:
197:
173:. I actually
126:
125:
25:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1113:
1104:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1089:
1083:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1054:
1052:
1048:
1037:
1035:
1029:
1025:
1023:
1019:
1005:
1001:
998:
994:
990:
984:
980:
976:
972:
971:
968:
965:
953:
943:
936:
930:
918:
917:
916:
909:
906:
904:
901:
898:
897:
894:
891:
889:
886:
883:
882:
879:
876:
874:
871:
868:
867:
864:
861:
859:
856:
853:
852:
848:
845:
842:
841:
838:
829:
825:
821:
817:
813:
812:
811:
807:
803:
798:
797:
796:
795:
794:
793:
789:
785:
781:
773:
767:
763:
759:
755:
754:
753:
752:
751:
750:
746:
736:
735:
734:
725:
715:
711:
710:
705:
704:
700:
694:
691:
688:
683:
677:
673:
669:
665:
658:
651:
650:
649:
648:
644:
640:
636:
632:
625:
622:
616:
612:
608:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
599:
595:
591:
587:
580:
576:
572:
569:accessible.--
568:
564:
560:
556:
554:
550:
546:
542:
537:
536:
535:
534:
531:
529:
520:
511:
507:
503:
499:
495:
494:
493:
489:
485:
480:
479:
478:
477:
474:
472:
463:
459:
450:
448:
447:
443:
439:
434:
430:
426:
424:
420:
415:
413:
408:
402:
400:
399:
395:
391:
387:
379:
377:
376:
373:
369:
362:
360:
359:
356:
355:
346:
341:
340:
339:
338:
335:
331:
327:
319:
317:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
295:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
276:doctors' mess
273:
268:
266:
258:
256:
255:
250:
246:
242:
237:
233:
225:
223:
222:
218:
214:
206:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
168:
164:
163:
162:
159:
155:
152:
148:
147:
146:
143:
139:
134:
130:
129:
128:
127:
124:
121:
117:
114:
110:
106:
102:
98:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
77:Web archiving
73:
72:
71:
70:
67:
63:
60:
54:
50:
48:
44:
39:
34:
24:
20:
16:
1088:page history
1084:
1066:, but other
1055:
1047:edit summary
1038:
1031:
1027:
1015:
928:
914:
836:
777:
729:
728:
721:
714:more details
708:
707:
692:
657:User WebCite
628:
583:
566:
545:Softlavender
527:
516:
484:Softlavender
470:
454:
435:
431:
427:
416:
409:
406:
383:
366:
352:
350:
324:The article
323:
296:
282:docs there (
269:
262:
229:
210:
170:
166:
150:
137:
112:
58:
55:
51:
40:
27:
983:LeadSongDog
732:Hydroxonium
462:Han Sai Por
458:Choor Singh
299:more of you
288:User:Dlodge
109:Open access
97:Open access
1094:FastilyBot
988:come howl!
624:WP:WebCite
563:Tang Da Wu
519:Tang Da Wu
334:YechielMan
272:WP:CLINMED
1080:consensus
1020:has been
1016:The file
957:template.
849:el_index
438:ThaddeusB
372:Mayumashu
249:E-mail me
241:Talk Page
171:guideline
17:welcome,
1092:Thanks,
933:You can
820:nn123645
784:nn123645
664:Blargh29
639:Blargh29
590:Blargh29
502:Blargh29
496:Try the
436:Thanks,
245:Contribs
93:Link rot
89:Citation
899:125461
631:WebCite
541:WebCite
460:" and "
407:Hello,
330:WP:AUTO
303:Nephron
105:WP:CITE
85:WebCite
33:welcome
23:WebCite
1049:or on
869:22306
854:22306
846:el_to
843:el_id
236:Nwwaew
167:policy
138:Nature
57:way.
19:WP:COI
884:1168
802:Eysen
758:Eysen
607:Eysen
571:Elvey
213:Elvey
187:Elvey
179:Elvey
142:Eysen
1098:talk
979:here
824:talk
816:here
806:talk
788:talk
780:here
762:talk
668:talk
643:talk
611:talk
594:talk
575:talk
549:talk
524:Jack
506:talk
488:talk
467:Jack
442:talk
394:talk
280:T.O.
217:talk
191:talk
183:talk
154:here
116:here
62:here
1002:of
962:ΔT
952:YGM
947:or
588:.--
528:Lee
471:Lee
354:DGG
347:fix
247:) (
243:) (
1100:)
1053:.
1036:.
955:}}
949:{{
945:}}
939:{{
826:)
808:)
790:)
764:)
747:)
716:)
670:)
660:}}
654:{{
645:)
613:)
596:)
577:)
567:is
565:)
551:)
508:)
490:)
444:)
396:)
294:.
286:,
219:)
193:)
95:,
91:,
87:,
83:,
79:,
36:}}
30:{{
21:,
1096:(
822:(
804:(
786:(
760:(
744:O
742:3
740:H
737:(
666:(
641:(
609:(
592:(
573:(
547:(
504:(
486:(
456:"
440:(
392:(
311:C
309:|
307:T
251:)
239:(
215:(
189:(
181:(
158:♠
156:…
151:∴
120:♠
118:…
113:∴
66:♠
64:…
59:∴
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.