709:
before the move, for edits i she'd made on the un-suffixed title, just before the deletion. (Otherwise, i could only explain how Pam's revisions got back in the history of the unsuffixed title by giving up my recollection of what actions get recorded in a page's deletion log, or supposing that someone agreed with my concern about PamD's revisions, and restored them using methods that i understand stopped having reasons for their use about three years ago. The choice among these is, for a stubborn editor,tougher than you are likely to imagine.)
764:
expect i'll manage to convince you on the changes). I'll also look at PamD's deleted revisions, which IIRC were for the Dab page, but apply them in a separate edit, at least if there's anything i missed. In any case, perhaps those revisions should be restored, since their deletion was apparently at best an oversight. Don't hesitate to leave something here about any concerns you see. (Written before my most recent posts, but i overlooked saving it until final cleanup of windows!)
469:
36:
167:
105:
395:
638:
another page. You seem to have been active long enuf .that you could have moved the Dab page to the unsuffixed title, replacing the historyless redirect. But presumably you felt the need to get rid of the historyless redirect, bcz you were used to making moves to non-existent pages, and you thot that
746:
My issue abt the speedy is purely procedural and not content related, and i think no one probably screwed up: PamD's edits precluded the speedy you requested, but my guess is that the admin checked that you were only editor and deleted, but her edits snuck in between the check and the deletion. (My
763:
I've now looked at your relocated version of the Dab, and you went in a pretty good direction. I'm folding what i had done into your most recent version, with adjustments for the equal disambiguation (which i hadn't decided to pursue but support) and i'll save it without prejudice to yours (tho i
708:
Well, the simplest interpretation of that is: In the fast moving situation where 3 editors (you, me, and PamD) were overlapping edits in working on the content of the Dab, and two others were facilitating you in moving the page, i got confused and took the two edits on the Dab text that PamD made
643:
look like a non-existent page's edit page, you could move anything you wanted to it. Actually, by blanking the rdr page, you gave it its first edit, and foreclosed your option of making the second move/rename without help. But your blanking resulted in a speedy-deletion request, which was quickly
249:
deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with
Knowledge's policies and guidelines.
729:
BTW, the way to make this work w/o Edit
Conflicts is to compose in a blank window, but not start your edit of the section we are all editing until you are ready to cut and paste your whole next message from there to here and immediately save.
185:
infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of
644:
acted upon by an admin, and when you tried again (as it happens, fewer than 14 seconds after the deletion), you succeeded as a result of the deletion, which again gave you a page that had (since the deletion) not been edited.
512:
to do that when you move a disambig page, but it's usually a good idea to. If you do this though, you probably don't need to worry about links in talk page archives and such, just articles. Happy editing!
634:) a "historyless redirect", a misleading term for a page that contains redirect markup put there by the move tool, but has never been edited; its edit history page shows only one entry, describing a move
592:
now a functioning disambiguation page and does not need to be deleted! If the suggestion about speedly deletion is still out there perhaps we can close the matter and keep the page in being. thanks
120:
358:
Thank you very much for presenting me with a
Citation Barnstar. This is the first barnstar I have ever been awarded, and it really made my day when I saw it. Thanks once again! --
684:
I see that you have also been working in the last hour relating to Dab'n of James
Humphreys (and i think two of your edits make the speedy deln out-of-process. I just wrote on
533:
You and i seem to be working simultaneously on the disambiguation of "James
Humphreys". Please talk to me abt whether you are done and if not what you intend next with it.
825:
796:
Missed seeing your response; seems yours weren't caught in the deletion part of the maelstrom after all, and your changes IMO fared well in the collaboration. Thanks.
123:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
201:
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow
Knowledge to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include
441:
Sorry, the message was automated and is not appropriate. But I believe we should delete a page completly or at lease leave the content. What do you think?
324:, as it may be a common typo - it may not survive a proposed deletion, but I'm in favor of have more redirects until Knowledge gets a better search engine
54:; specifically, it has no content, other than external links, categories, "see also" sections, rephrasing of the title, and/or chat-like comments.
405:
828:: the Je.. entries, or the J... ones, or (a few weeks ago, when there were 50 or so) the H... thru L... entries. Right now there are 500, tho. .
51:
782:
I never saw a speedy, just did some tidying up and have done a bit more just now - no particular interest in any of the JHs, just dropped by.
210:
622:
Well, no. Besides misinterpreting what i said, i think you're still confused about the problem you had. You succeeded in moving
627:
241:
205:
the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the
521:
70:
608:
OK fine, thanks. I saw your note to PamD and I agree - the speedy deletion is no longer relevant. the page is ok now
688:; perhaps we should make an effort to keep all discussion of this there for now; would you be willing to chime in?
291:
was created in addition to the former article. I didn't intend to delete on notability grounds, but on repetition.
58:
116:
47:
321:
288:
284:
235:
174:
160:
112:
819:
630:
because no page with the suffixed title existed. But when you move a page you leave behind (in this case at
417:
119:. I do not feel that this article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at
66:
65:. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our
493:
182:
62:
400:
329:
296:
214:
135:
698:
609:
601:
593:
543:
374:
340:
306:
265:
255:
145:
86:
17:
220:
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding
413:
412:
for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative
409:
519:
43:
468:
844:
803:
771:
754:
737:
716:
695:
673:
651:
640:
631:
623:
589:
577:
557:
540:
225:
77:
550:
I may have gotten straight re the related deletion, but plz mention how that figures in.
787:
663:
325:
292:
131:
35:
479:
448:
427:
363:
251:
239:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
178:
126:
514:
177:
requesting that it be speedily deleted from
Knowledge. This has been done under
166:
104:
840:
799:
767:
750:
733:
712:
691:
669:
647:
573:
553:
536:
847:
806:
791:
783:
774:
757:
740:
719:
676:
654:
617:
580:
567:
560:
523:
456:
435:
382:
367:
348:
333:
314:
300:
273:
259:
153:
139:
94:
80:
25:
443:
422:
359:
394:
206:
566:
You answered on my talk (but let's converge here for now, along with
408:
has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the
57:
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our
467:
245:
explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for
165:
103:
34:
121:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/James humphreys (lawyer)
486:
747:
edits, on the other hand, were still in prepartion!)
209:, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at
85:
I trust this page will survive in its current form!
815:edits to the pages on my last few days' contribs;
826:Category:Disambiguation pages in need of cleanup
179:section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion
181:, because the article appears to be a blatant
236:the page that has been nominated for deletion
8:
508:hey no problem. bte, you don't necessarily
100:AfD nomination of James humphreys (lawyer)
818:whether there are more than 15 pages at
406:Talk:Richard Humphreys (philanthropist)
31:Speedy deletion of "Francis Humphrys"
7:
213:for more details, or ask a question
211:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
71:guide to writing your first article
812:Nor i: What i look at each day is
528:
14:
320:I don't see any reason to delete
144:Page now redirects appropriately
50:, as it meets one or more of the
588:Howdy! Thanks for your message
416:. You may also wish to read the
393:
639:if you made the edit page for
628:James Humphreys (UK politician)
474:Hello, Familytree101. You have
207:GNU Free Documentation License
115:, an article you created, for
1:
570:). I'm copying your contrib.
480:User talk:IRP#James Humphreys
457:22:48, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
436:22:47, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
383:11:04, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
489:at any time by removing the
52:criteria for speedy deletion
848:09:29, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
807:09:09, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
792:07:48, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
775:08:55, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
758:01:30, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
741:01:25, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
720:08:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
699:01:06, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
677:01:20, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
655:08:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
618:01:13, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
602:01:02, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
581:01:11, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
561:00:57, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
544:00:55, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
524:00:11, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
368:12:49, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
349:07:21, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
334:01:16, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
315:04:32, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
301:04:13, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
283:My intention was to delete
274:04:31, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
260:04:11, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
154:04:04, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
140:03:51, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
95:21:53, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
81:21:43, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
26:21:27, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
867:
398:Welcome to Knowledge. The
322:Richard Humphreys(writer)
190:, but not as a source of
173:A tag has been placed on
129:of receiving this notice?
16:Welcome to my talk page!
613:
529:Dab'n of James Humphreys
378:
344:
310:
289:James Humphreys (lawyer)
285:James humphreys (lawyer)
279:James Humphreys (lawyer)
269:
196:say it in your own words
194:. This part is crucial:
175:James Humphreys (lawyer)
161:James Humphreys (lawyer)
149:
113:James humphreys (lawyer)
90:
21:
820:Category:Disambiguation
686:User talk:Familytree101
418:introduction to editing
67:introduction to editing
472:
170:
108:
46:, has been tagged for
39:
471:
373:You're most welcome!
169:
107:
38:
203:on the external site
63:inclusion guidelines
42:A page you created,
159:Speedy deletion of
61:and any applicable
487:remove this notice
473:
305:No problem Thanks
171:
109:
40:
590:James Humphreysis
452:
431:
130:
111:I have nominated
858:
517:
500:
498:
492:
453:
450:
446:
432:
429:
425:
403:
397:
264:Tag now removed
231:
230:
224:
124:
59:content policies
44:Francis Humphrys
866:
865:
861:
860:
859:
857:
856:
855:
703:
662:I left this at
641:James Humphreys
632:James Humphreys
624:James Humphreys
605:
531:
515:
506:
501:
496:
490:
484:
465:
449:
444:
428:
423:
399:
391:
356:
281:
228:
222:
221:
164:
125:Do you want to
102:
33:
12:
11:
5:
864:
862:
854:
853:
852:
851:
850:
834:
833:
832:
831:
830:
829:
823:
816:
810:
809:
797:
780:
779:
778:
777:
765:
760:
748:
744:
743:
731:
726:
725:
724:
723:
722:
710:
701:
689:
682:
681:
680:
679:
667:
664:User talk:PamD
660:
659:
658:
657:
645:
586:
585:
584:
583:
571:
564:
563:
551:
546:
534:
530:
527:
505:
502:
483:
466:
464:
461:
460:
459:
420:. Thank you.
390:
387:
386:
385:
355:
352:
337:
336:
280:
277:
163:
157:
101:
98:
32:
29:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
863:
849:
846:
842:
838:
837:
836:
835:
827:
824:
821:
817:
814:
813:
811:
808:
805:
801:
795:
794:
793:
789:
785:
781:
776:
773:
769:
762:
761:
759:
756:
752:
745:
742:
739:
735:
728:
727:
721:
718:
714:
707:
706:
705:
704:
702:
700:
697:
693:
687:
678:
675:
671:
665:
661:
656:
653:
649:
642:
637:
633:
629:
625:
621:
620:
619:
615:
611:
610:familytree101
607:
606:
604:
603:
599:
595:
594:familytree101
591:
582:
579:
575:
569:
565:
562:
559:
555:
549:
548:
547:
545:
542:
538:
526:
525:
522:
520:
518:
511:
503:
495:
488:
481:
477:
470:
462:
458:
455:
454:
447:
440:
439:
438:
437:
434:
433:
426:
419:
415:
411:
407:
402:
396:
389:November 2008
388:
384:
380:
376:
375:familytree101
372:
371:
370:
369:
365:
361:
353:
351:
350:
346:
342:
341:familytree101
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
318:
317:
316:
312:
308:
307:familytree101
303:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
278:
276:
275:
271:
267:
266:familytree101
262:
261:
257:
253:
248:
244:
243:
242:the talk page
238:
237:
227:
218:
216:
212:
208:
204:
199:
197:
193:
189:
184:
180:
176:
168:
162:
158:
156:
155:
151:
147:
146:familytree101
142:
141:
137:
133:
128:
122:
118:
114:
106:
99:
97:
96:
92:
88:
87:familytree101
83:
82:
79:
74:
72:
68:
64:
60:
55:
53:
49:
45:
37:
30:
28:
27:
23:
19:
18:familytree101
685:
683:
635:
597:
587:
532:
509:
507:
476:new messages
475:
451:/talk to me/
442:
430:/talk to me/
421:
414:edit summary
404:you made to
392:
357:
338:
304:
282:
263:
246:
240:
233:
219:
202:
200:
195:
191:
187:
172:
143:
110:
84:
75:
56:
41:
15:
494:newmessages
401:recent edit
234:the top of
188:information
76:Thank you.
78:Lunchscale
568:User:PamD
504:Re: links
499:template.
326:Editor437
293:Editor437
287:, since
192:sentences
183:copyright
132:Editor437
485:You may
354:Barnstar
339:OK fine
252:justinfr
117:deletion
48:deletion
410:sandbox
127:opt out
516:Thingg
463:Notice
247:speedy
226:hangon
841:Jerzy
800:Jerzy
768:Jerzy
751:Jerzy
734:Jerzy
713:Jerzy
692:Jerzy
670:Jerzy
648:Jerzy
574:Jerzy
554:Jerzy
537:Jerzy
788:talk
784:PamD
614:talk
598:talk
510:have
379:talk
364:talk
345:talk
330:talk
311:talk
297:talk
270:talk
256:talk
215:here
150:talk
136:talk
91:talk
69:and
22:talk
666:.
626:to
478:at
445:abf
424:abf
360:Jll
232:to
217:.
839:--
798:--
790:)
766:--
749:--
732:--
711:--
690:--
668:--
646:--
636:to
616:)
600:)
572:--
552:--
535:--
497:}}
491:{{
381:)
366:)
347:)
332:)
313:)
299:)
272:)
258:)
229:}}
223:{{
198:.
152:)
138:)
93:)
73:.
24:)
845:t
843:•
822:;
804:t
802:•
786:(
772:t
770:•
755:t
753:•
738:t
736:•
717:t
715:•
696:t
694:•
674:t
672:•
652:t
650:•
612:(
596:(
578:t
576:•
558:t
556:•
541:t
539:•
482:.
377:(
362:(
343:(
328:(
309:(
295:(
268:(
254:(
148:(
134:(
89:(
20:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
